HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - City Council - 1988 - 05/09 - WorkshopALLEN CITY COUNCIL
CALLED - SPECIAL WORKSHOP SESSION
MAY 9, 1988
Present:
Joe Farmer, Mayor
Council Members:
Rex Womack
Jerry Wilson, Mayor Pro Tem
Bobby Glass
Jim Wolfe
Jim Pendleton
Absent:
Jack Pennington
City staff:
Jon McCarty, City Manager
Marty Hendrix, City Secretary
Charlotte Smith, Finance Director
Guests:
Lewis L. McLain, Jr., Administrative & Fiscal Consulting Services, Inc.
Bob McLain, Administrative & Fiscal Consulting Services, Inc.
With a quorum of the Council Members present, the Called - Special
Workshop Session of the Allen City Council was called to order by Mayor
Farmer at 7:04 p.m. on Monday, May 9, 1988, in the Council Chambers of the
Allen Municipal Annex, One Butler Circle, Allen, Texas.
Workshop Session: Presentation by
Lewis McLain, with Administrative
& Fiscal Consulting Services, Inc.,
on Updated Water & Sewer Rate Information (Agenda Item II)
Mr. Lewis McLain distributed to the Council handout information showing
rate increase considerations, which included information on the recommenda-
tions that impact the fiscal years of 1987 - 88 and 1988 - 89; and information
entitled "Revenue Bond Refunding Analysis as of May 1, 1988."
Mr. McLain then began his review of those documents which included
items that had been proposed at the workshop session held on April 18th:
1. Adjusting the water loss assumption from 25% to 20% in 1987
thru 1988 and from 20% to 10% in 1988 to 1989.
2. Raising the sewer ceiling to 14,000 gallons.
3. The critical adequacy test in 1987-88 is the 1.20 legal debt
coverage test.
4. Lowering the G & A charge or funding all capital out of
Capital Recovery Fees will not affect the coverage test.
5. If a ratio of 1.25 for the legal rate coverage test is met, if
the ceiling on sewer is raised to 14,000 gallons, and if the
water loss assumption is changed to 20%, then there would
only be a need for a 25% rate increase to be effective by the
end of May 1988.
ALLEN CITY COUNCIL
CALLED - SPECIAL WORKSHOP SESSION
MAY 9, 1988 Page 2
Workshop Seasinn: Presentation by
Lewis McLain, with Administrative
& Fiscal Consulting Services, Inc.,
on Updated Water & Sewer Rate Information (cont'd) (Agenda Item II)
6. The alternative of adjusting the goal of meeting the legal
rate debt coverage test for 1987-88.
7. To view a needed rate increase as effecting the next twelve
months, not to be concerned with the coverage test at the
end of the fiscal year 1988.
8. The rate increase would only then be 14.92%. The debt
coverage test would not be met for FY 87-88, but would be
met 12 months from now.
9. In order to meet the test by the end of FY 88-89, there
would be a need to raise rates an additional 25% a year from
now. Then a 5% rate increase would not be needed for 1989-
90.
Mr. McLain then reviewed the figures shown on a chart of the North
Texas Municipal Water District Water Purchase -- Changes in Water Loss. He
then advised of the recommendations that will impact the fiscal year of 1987
- 88 and 1988 - 89.
There was discussion by the Council on the removal of the $140,524 0£
interest accrued to the Beltz Outlet Mall per the contract and how it will
effect the rate increase. There was further discussion on the general time
frame for the debt restructuring to be presented by Mr. McLain.
Mr. McLain explained to the Council the disadvantages of debt restruc-
turing for their water and sewer revenue bonds.
Mr. McLain then reviewed with the Council the "Revenue Bond Refunding
Analysis as of May 1, 1988", beginning with the key terms to consider. Those
terms included refunding versus advance refunding, partial refunding versus
full refunding, call dates versus maturity dates, refunded bonds versus
refunding bonds, escrow agent versus paying agent, state and local govern-
ment securities (SLGS) versus open market securities, credit enhancements,
underwriting fees, other issuance costs, present value versus future value,
arbitrage limits, net interest costs (NIC) and true interest costs (TIC), bond
indenture, and defeasance.
Mr. McLain then reviewed with the Council the reasons for refunding the
city water and sewer revenue bonds, the objectives of this refunding, key
assumptions to consider, an overview of the process, and the conclusions.
There was considerable discussion by the Council on this proposal for the
refunding of the water and sewer revenue bonds debt.
There was further discussion on the options that were available to the
Council at this time and discussion on the Beltz Outlet Mall contract, how it
can be shown in the figures, and how this effected the proposed rate
increase.
The Council reviewed again with city staff and Mr. McLain the major
points to be considered. Those were:
1. Adjusting the water loss assumption from 25% to 20% in
1987 - 88 and from 20% to 10% in 1988-89.
2. Raising the sewer ceiling to 14,000 gallons.
3. To view a needed rate increase as effecting the next twelve
months, not be concerned with the debt coverage test at the
end of the fiscal year 1988.
ALLEN CITY COUNCIL
CALLED - SPECIAL WORKSHOP SESSION
MAY 9, 1988 Page 3
Workshop Session: Presentation by
Lewis McLain, with Administrative
& Fiscal Consulting Services, Inc.,
on Updated Water & Sewer Rate Information (cont'd) (Agenda Item II)
4. Move forward with the debt refinancing.
There was further discussion on how the proposed 13.4% rate increase
was determined and what factors were involved in order to achieve that.
There was discussion on the timing of rate increases and at what time during
the year those increases should be implemented. Mr. McLain suggested that
they should occur on January 1st or October let.
There was discussion as requested by Councilman Womack on certain
figures that were presented in the original study document that was dis-
tributed prior to the workshop session held on April 18, 1988.
City Manager McCarty advised of the water loss situation experienced on
the Jupiter Road Water System and how the city intended to resolve this
problem so that all of the water passing through the city's meter will be
accounted and paid for.
In further discussion, Mayor Farmer suggested that the proposed
alternatives be reviewed by the Council and that they meet two tests. Those
tests were, is the alternative reasonable and what was the net effect of it.
The Council reviewed and discussed the water loss assumption from 25%
to 20% in 1987 - 88 and from 20% to 10% in 1988 - 89 with city staff and
asked the City Manager if he had any concerns in this assumption. Mr.
McCarty expressed his concerns with the figures proposed for the next fiscal
year of 1988 - 89 and whether they could be met. In conclusion, it was the
consensus of the Council to go forward with this assumption as presented.
The Council reviewed and discussed the raising the sewer ceiling to
14,000 gallons. It was pointed out how this increase will appear in the
customer's bill and that it would be shifting the cost of the water to the
sewer costs. In conclusion, it was the consensus of the Council to eliminate
this item from consideration in the assumptions for the rate increase.
Mr. McLain pointed out to the Council that this would bring the rate increase
up to 14.92%. Of that figure, the rate increase for 1987 - 88 would be 13.34%
and 1.58% for next fiscal year.
The Council then reviewed and discussed changing the time frame for the
debt coverage factor test. This would mean considering the time frame from
May 31st rather than September 30th. The results of this change would
mean that the city would not meet its debt coverage factor for FY 1987 - 88,
but would meet it for next year.
In further discussion, City Manager McCarty discussed with Mr. McLain
how this revision in the proposed rate increase from the original 31% down to
the 15% would be justified in the study in order to satisfy the bond rating
agencies.
In the conclusion on the discussion on changing the period for the debt
coverage test, it was the consensus of the Council to go forward with
changing the time frame from September 30th to May 31st.
There was review and discussion on the last assumption, that being
whether or not to go forward with the debt refinancing. There was
considerable discussion on the refinancing of the bonds, how the interest
rates could change, the advantages and the disadvantages and how to use the
break even basis.
In the conclusion on the discussion on whether to go forward with the
debt refinancing, it was the consensus of the Council to not go forward with
ALLEN CITY COUNCIL
CALLED - SPECIAL WORKSHOP SESSION
MAY 9, 1988 Page 4
Workshop Session: Presentation by
Lewis McLain, with Ad®nistrative
6 Fiscal Consulting Services, Inc.,
on Updated Water 6 Sewer Rate Information (cont'd) (Agenda Item II)
that at this time, however, work should be done by city staff in order to get
ready to do the refinancing if the bond market opens up and the interest
rates are favorable.
There was further discussion on the Beltz Outlet Mall contract and the
status of it.
City Manager Jon McCarty advised the Council that there would be two
additional items included in the proposed water and sewer rate ordinance to
be considered by the Council. He advised that those items were the situation
involving the Jupiter Road Water Supply System and to clarify in more detail
the city's position as it relates to clogs in sewer lines and what action will
be taken by the city.
Discuss Schedule for Public Hearing
and Consideration of Water and Sewer
Rate Adjustment (Agenda Item I11)
The city staff advised the Council that an ordinance would be prepared,
based upon the discussions held at this meeting, for their consideration at the
Council meeting to be held on Thursday, May 19, 1988, and that a public
hearing would be held at that time on the rates.
There was discussion on this public hearing by the Council and how it
was to be conducted.
Items of Interest to the Council (Agenda Item IV)
City
Manager Jon McCarty advised
the Council of the results of a bid
opening
held on the
infrastructure for
the municipal complex site and that
this item
would also
be placed on the Council's agenda for May 19.
Adjournment
(Agenda Item V)
MOTION: Upon a motion made by Councilman Womack and seconded by
Councilman Glass, the Council voted six (6) for and none (0)
opposed to adjourn the called - special workshop session of the
Allen City Council at 9:35 p.m. on Monday, May 9, 1988. The
motion carried.
These minutes approved on the 19th day of MAY , 1988.
APPROVED:
twe J96 Farmer, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Marty Hendrix, CEIC, CITY SECRETARY