Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - Planning and Zoning Commission - 2015 - 09/15 - RegularSeptember 15, 2015 I. Action taken on the Planning & Zoning Commission items by City Council at September 8, 2015, regular meeting, attached. Consent Agenda (Routine P&Z business. Consent Agenda is approved by a single majority vote Items may be removed for open discussion by a request from a Commission member or member of staff) 2. Approve minutes from the September I, 2015, regular meeting. 3 Capital Improvement Program CIP Status Report. Motion: Upon a motion by 1" Vice -Chair Mangrum, and a second by Commissioner Platt, the Commission voted 5 IN FAVOR, and 0 OPPOSED to approve the Consent Agenda. IThe motion carried. ;1_ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting September 15, 2015 CITY OF ALLEN ATTENDANCE: Commissioners Present: Jeff Cocking, Chair Shirley Mangmm, 1" Vice -Chair John Ogrizovich Michael Orr Stephen Platt, Jr. Absent Ben Trahan, 2"d Vice -Chair Luke Hollingsworth City Stall Present Bo Bass, AICP, Director of Community Development Shawn Poe, Assistant Director of Engineering Madhuri Kulkami, Planner David Dodd, City Attorney Call to Order and Announce a Quorum is Present. With a quorum of the Commissioners present, Chairman Cocking called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers Room at Allen City Hall, 305 Century Parkway Director's Report I. Action taken on the Planning & Zoning Commission items by City Council at September 8, 2015, regular meeting, attached. Consent Agenda (Routine P&Z business. Consent Agenda is approved by a single majority vote Items may be removed for open discussion by a request from a Commission member or member of staff) 2. Approve minutes from the September I, 2015, regular meeting. 3 Capital Improvement Program CIP Status Report. Motion: Upon a motion by 1" Vice -Chair Mangrum, and a second by Commissioner Platt, the Commission voted 5 IN FAVOR, and 0 OPPOSED to approve the Consent Agenda. IThe motion carried. September 15, 2015 Regular Agenda 4. Preliminary Plat — Consider a request for a Preliminary Plat for 9.979± acres situated in the David Wetzell Survey, Abstract No 977, City of Allen, Collin County, Texas; generally located south of Main Street and east of Greenville Avenue. (PP -7/6/15-43) [Parkview Lane] Ms. Madhuri Kulkarni, Planner, presented to the Commission. She stated the item is a Preliminary Plat for Parkview Lane The property is located on the south side of Main Street and between Greenville Avenue and Jupiter Road. The property is currently zoned PD -120 TH. Surrounding zoning includes SC to the north, SC and PD -19 MF to the east, CF and R-3 to the south, and CF, R-3 and SC to the west Ms. Kulkarni stated that the property was rezoned for a Planned Development for Townhomes in June 2015 Preliminary platting is the next step in the development process. The plat shows 9.98± acres, with 91 single-family lots and 12 open space lots. There are two primary access points into the site — one on Greenville Avenue and one on Jupiter Road. Ms. Kulkami pointed out that the Preliminary Plat boundary does not include the Bre lane, access, and utility easement on the northwestern portion of the property, which is consistent with the Concept Plan This northwestern area will be subsequently replatted and incorporated into Lot 2R (Walgreens) The Preliminary Plat has been reviewed by the Technical Review Committee, is consistent with the PD Concept Plan, and meets the requirements for the Allen Land Development Code. Chairman Cocking asked the City Engineer if the deceleration lane on Jupiter Road is completed or pending Mr Shawn Poe, Assistant Director of Engineering, stated that the deceleration lane is still pending and will be reviewed in the construction plan stage Motion: Upon a motion by Commissioner Platt, and a second by Commissioner Orr, the Commission voted 5 IN FAVOR, and 0 OPPOSED to approve the Preliminary Plat for 9.979± acres generally located south of Main Street and east of Greenville Avenue for Parkview Lane. 5. Public Hearing — Conduct a Public Hearing and consider a request to amend the Development Regulations of Tract M of Planned Development No. 92 and adopt a Concept Plan and Building Elevations for 3.76± acres situated in the Francis Dosser Survey, Abstract No. 280, City of Allen, Collin County, Texas; located at the northeast corner of Stacy Road and Watters Road. (Z-6/16/15- 41) [Stacy Village] Ms. Madhuri Kulkami, Planner, presented to the Commission She stated the item is a public hearing and a PD Amendment for Stacy Village. The subject property is located on the northeast corner of Watters Road and Stacy Road, and currently zoned PD -92 for Shopping Center. Surrounding zoning includes PD -92 R-7 to the north and the east, PD - 86 SC to the south, and PD -43 GO to the west. September 15, 2015 The original PD for this entire site was adopted in 2004. It was subsequently amended in 2004 and 2012. The most recent PD amendment adopted a Concept Plan, which showed four lots for retail, restaurant, and office uses. The PD also adopted elevations and development regulations The original PD addressed uses, screening, and driveway access. In this request, the applicant is proposing to revise the concept plan and the building elevations for the development of this property This concept plan shows 3.76± acres and shows the area being divided into two lots. Lot I is 2.7± acres and will include an approximate 21,600 square foot building which is for retail and restaurant uses. Lot 2 is about one acre and includes an approximately 9,900 square foot building to be used for medical office use Detention is required for this site — it was shown on the northern side of the property on the original ordinance, and is now located on the eastern side of the property Access on the site has not changed. There are still 3 access points — two (2) on Stacy Road and one (1) on Watters Road. The stacking depths are reduced on the access points to accommodate the development, and in lieu, there will be two right - turn lanes (one on Stacy Road and one on Watters Road). Perimeter screening has not changed as well, and consists of an existing retaining wall and a 6 5' masonry screening wall. In addition, there is an l l' space along the eastern and northern sides for additional landscaping such as trees and shrubbery Staff believes that the screening with additional landscaping is still a fair trade to demolishing the existing screening and building an 8' masonry wall. The building architecture is changing from the original ordinance to the elevations Ms. Kulkami presented Both buildings (Lots 1 and 2) will be one story and will consist of brick, stone, and stucco Ms. Kulkarni then presented the development regulations. These included a change in the language from the original ordinance regarding Drive -Through to state "Tract M" instead of "Lot I" (which may be constructed in association with a use other than a restaurant) as well as a stacking depth to be as shown on the Concept Plan. Commissioner Platt commented that a drive-through does not seem feasible on either of the lots according to the Concept Plan. He asked if the development intends to have a drive-through Ms. Kulkarni stated that the intent is to not have a drive-through for a restaurant use If the developers want to fit a drive-through, it would be open to a use other than a restaurant use. Commissioner Platt stated the way that the Concept Plan is drawn, the development does not seem suitable for a drive-through. Chairman Cocking asked what the process would be if the developers want to do a drive-through. Ms. Kulkami stated that a drive-through is permitted with this Concept Plan and the PD. When the developers submit a Site Plan, they will show it on there. This will most likely affect the western side of Lot 2, but said she does not think it will be major enough to go back and revise the Concept Plan. Mr. Bass stated that the configuration would have to be in substantial conformance with the Concept Plan. If the drive-through affects circulation, access points, or creates traffic issues, it would come back through the zoning process. He stated that staffs understanding is that there is no intention of putting a 1 drive-thru and it is not designed for such September 15, 2015 Commissioner Ogrizov,ch said that he wanted to clarify that the developers could potentially do a drive- through for a non -restaurant. Ms Kulkami answered yes. Commissioner Ogrizovich asked for examples. Ms. Kulkami stated that the drive-through could be for a pharmacy or dry-cleaners Commissioner Ogrizovich asked where the drive-through would be located to not significantly change traffic patterns. The applicant, Moshe Golan, 5164 Village Creek Drive, Plano, TX, stated he is the property owner and developer He said they currently don't have any plans to have a drive-through and are not considering it. If it will happen, they will have to make changes in the plans Commissioner Ogrizovich said that with the original zoning, quite a few neighbors from the north were quite concerned about the drive-through. Is it possible to bar a drive-thru restaurant? Mr. Bass said that that provision would be more clearly worded than what the commissioners have seen in the case report to specifically prohibit drive-through restaurants from this entire site. The things that would be taken into consideration for a potential drive-through would be queuing. He suggested that based on this current design, if something changed, it would come back through this process. t Chairman Cocking opened the public hearing Mr. Dave Linberg, 2206 Thombury Lane, Allen, TX, commented that he looked through the original design with the peaked roof and asked why that architectural style was not followed since the surrounding neighborhood is an upper scale area with many multistory homes. Chairman Cocking closed the public hearing Ms. Kulkami stated that the applicant submitted elevations that were similar to elevations across the street. The elevations submitted showed flat roofs, which was acceptable to staff. Chairman Cocking commented that this developer has also developed the other side of Stacy Road The elevations will match and provide continuity along that portion of Stacy Road. Motion: Upon a motion by Commissioner Platt, and a second by I" Vice -Chair Mangrum, the Commission voted 5 IN FAVOR, and 0 OPPOSED to approve to amend the Development Regulations of Tract M of Planned Development No. 92 and adopt a Concept Plan and Building Elevations for Stacy Village. Executive Session (As Needed) As authorized by Section 551.071(2) of the Texas Government Code, this meeting may be convened into closed Executive Session for the purpose of seeking confidential legal advice from the City Attorney on any agenda item listed herein. September 15, 2015 IAdjournment The meeting adjourned at 7 18 p.m. These mir4tes�p/4d this day of QCALi6Y 2015. . WA i' Madhuri Kulkami, Planner 1 September 15, 2015 • Director's Report from 9/8/2015 City Council Meeting The request to adopt an Ordinance to amend the Development Regulations of Planned Development No. 108 and adopt a Concept Plan and Building Elevations relating to 8.142± acres, generally located on the southeast comer of the intersection of Raintree Circle and Junction Drive for the Alders at Twin Creeks, was tabled to the October 13, 2015, City Council meeting. 0