Loading...
O-2145-3-03ORDINANCE NO. 2145-3-03 ' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALLEN, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS, ADOPTING THE 2002-2022 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 1616-7-95; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A REPEALING CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the governing body of the City of Allen recognize the value of a Comprehensive Plan to guide the growth and development of the community; and, WHEREAS, the Citizen's Survey was a major resource tool in the development of the 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing(s) on December 3, December 17, 2002, and continued until January 7 and again until January 21, 2003, and again until February 4, 2003, and recommended that the City Council adopt the 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Allen held a public hearing on January 28, 2003, and continued the public hearing until February 11, 2003, and determined that the interests of the city were best served by adopting the 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALLEN, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan, dated December 2002, is hereby adopted in its entirety. SECTION 2. The Land Use Plan, adopted as a part of the 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan, does not constitute zoning regulations or establish zoning district boundaries. SECTION 3. The City Council directs that all boards, commissions and the city staff utilize the information contained within the 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan as a guideline upon which to base development decisions and to disseminate that information to all interested parties. SECTION 4. From and after the effective date of this ordinance, Ordinance No. 1616-7-98 is hereby repealed. SECTION 5. Should any word, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance, be adjudged or held to be void or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of said ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 6. All ordinances of the City of Allen, Collm County, Texas, in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed; provided, however that all other provisions of said ordinances not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. DULY PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALLEN, COLLIN ' COUNTY, TEXAS, ON THIS THE 11 m DAY OF MARCH, 2003. APPROVED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter G. Smith, CITY ATTORNEY 24--a7av Stephen Terrell, MAYOR ATTEST: �� SLelley B. Geo , TRMC, CI SECRETARY Ordinance No. 2145-3-03, Page 2 11sion s o J -?o rv� Nom, o CITY OF ALLEN 4'/ ��' I�ki�or�OOr'S Department of Planning & Development March 11, 2003 CITY OF ALLEN 2002-2022 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN City Council Steve Terrell, Mayor Kenneth Fulk, Mayor Pro Tem Debbie Stout Ross Obermeyer Bill Petty Susan Bartlemay Jeff McGregor City Manager Peter H. Vargas Planning & Zoning Commission Gary Caplinger, Chair Alan Grimes, First Vice -Chair Robin Sedlacek, Second Vice -Chair Kenneth Harvey Gary Stocker Darion Culbertson Robert Wendland Department of Planning & Development Marina Sukup, Director ORDINANCE NO. 2145-3-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALLEN, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS, ADOPTING THE 2002-2022 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 1616-7-98; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABHdTY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A REPEALING CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the governing body of the City of Allen recognize the value of a Comprehensive Plan to guide the growth and development of the community; and, WHEREAS, the Citizen's Survey was a major resource tool in the development of the 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing(s) on December 3, December 17, 2002, and continued until January 7 and again until January 21, 2003, and again until February 4, 2003, and recommended that the City Council adopt the 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Allen held a public hearing on January 28, 2003, and continued the public hearing until February 11, 2003, and determined that the interests of the city were best served by adopting the 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALLEN, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS, THAT; SECTION I. The 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan, dated December 2002, is hereby adopted in its entirety. SECTION 2. The Land Use Plan, adopted as a part of the 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan, does not constitute zoning regulations or establish zoning district boundaries. SECTION 3. The City Council directs that all boards, commissions and the city staff utilize the information contained within the 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan as a guideline upon which to base development decisions and to disseminate that information to all interested parties. SECTION 4. From and after the effective date of this ordinance, Ordinance No. 1616-7-98 is hereby repealed. SECTION 5. Should any word, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance, be adjudged or held to be void or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of said ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 6. All ordinances of the City of Allen, Collin County, Texas, in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed; provided, however that all other provisions of said ordinances not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Pace OVERVIEW................................................................................................................................ i 1. BACKGROUND Location............................................................................................................................... 1.1 HistoricContext................................................................................................................... 1.1 CommunityVision............................................................................................................... 1.1 History......................................................... 1.2 2. STATISTICS AND FORECASTS Population........................................................................................................................... 2.1 Income................................................................................................................................ 2.3 Age...................................................................................................................................... 2.3 Race& Ethnicity................................................................................. 2.6 3. LAND USE Neighborhood Planning Districts........................................................................................ 3.1 1998 Plan.................................................................................................................. 3.1 LandUse 2002.................................................................................................................. 3.1 FutureLand Use................................................................................................................. 3.4 Futureland Use Map.......................................................................................................... 3.6 Priorities and Implementation Strategies............................................................................ 3.8 3.1 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ExistingLand Uses.............................................................................................................3.1.1 TrafficCirculation................................................................................................................3.1.3 Standards for CBD Collectors.............................................................................................3.1.3 Proposed Street Extensions...............................................................................................3.1.4 Intersection Improvements..................................................................................................3.1.4 AlleyImprovements.............................................................................................................3.1.4 Parking......................................................................................................3.1.5 SidewalkSolutions..............................................................................................................3.1.5 Trails& Linkages.................................................................................................................3.1.6 Transit................................................................................................................................. 3.1.6 Water& Wastewater...........................................................................................................3.1.7 ExistingStreets .............. --................................................................................................. 3.1.7 NewStreets.........................................................................................................................3.1.8 Priorities & Implementation Strategies................................................................................3.1.10 4. TRANSPORTATION Allen's Relationship to Regional Transportation System .................................................... 4.1 Existing Conditions - Roadways......................................................................................... 4.1 ThoroughfarePlan.............................................................................................................. 4.2 Thoroughfare Design Standards......................................................................................... 4.3 TrafficModel Overview....................................................................................................... 4.4 FutureRoadways................................................................................................................ 4.4 Transit.................................................................................................................. 4.9 BicycleTransportation........................................................................................................ 4.9 Alternative Transportation & Recreational Trials................................................................4.10 Pedestrian Circulation ............. _.......................................................................................... 4.11 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan CitizenSurveys .................................................................................................................. 4.12 Priorities and Implementation Strategies ............................................................................ 4.13 5. NEIGHBORHOODS & HOUSING 9.1.1 Existing Housing Inventory ................................................................................................. 5.1 HousingForecast ................................................................................................................ 5.4 Housing Needs - Special Populations .......................................... ..................................... 5.5 Neighborhood Preservation ................................................................................................ 5.5 CitizenSurvey .................................................................................................................. 5.5 Priorities and Implementation Strategies ............................................................................ 5.8 6. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 9.2.2 Employment& Industry....................................................................................................... 6.1 Opportunities & Challenges ................................................................................................ 6.6 CitizenSurvey .................................................................................................................. 6.6 Priorities and Implementation Strategies ........................................................................... 6.7 7. ENVIRONMENT Geologyand Topography ................................................................................................... 7.1 Soils...... .............................................................................................................................. 7.3 Climate................................................................................................................................ 7.5 BiologicalFeatures ............................................................................................................. 7.6 Vegetation........................................................................................................... ............... 7.7 Wildlife................................................................................................................................. 7.11 PollutionPrevention ............................................................................................................ 7.21 Priorities and Implementation Strategies ............................................................................ 7.23 S. URBAN DESIGN Streetscapes................... .............................................................................................. 8.1 Concept.................................................................................................................. 8.4 OuterZone ..................................................................................................... ............ 8.6 ApproachZone .................................................................................................................. 8.10 CoreZone .............................................................................. ................................... 8.15 Central Business District..................................................................................................... 8.21 CatalystProjects ................................................................................................................. 8.25 Allen Historic Village ........................................................................................................... 8.25 CitizenSurvey .................................................................................................................. 8.26 Priorities and Implementation Strategies ............................................................................ 8.28 9. COMMUNITY FACILITIES & SERVICES 9.1 Government Formof Government .............................................................................................. 9.1.1 E -Government .................................................................................................... 9.1.1 CitizenSurvey .................................................................................................... 9.1.2 Priorities and Implementation Strategies ............................................................... 9.1.3 9.2 Public Safety Police.................................................................................................................. 9.2.1 Patrol......................................................................................................... 9.2.1 Investigative Services ............................................................................... 9.2.2 CrimePrevention .......... .......... ................................................................ 9.2.2 AnimalControl ............ ............................................................................. 9.2.3 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan MunicipalCourt .........................................................................................9.2.3 CP T E D...................................................................................................... 9.2.4 CitizenSurvey...........................................................................................9.2.4 Priorities and Implementation Strategies ..................................................9.2.5 9.3 Public Safety Fire......................................................................................................................... 9.3.1 FireStations..............................................................................................9.3.1 Selected Statistics.....................................................................................9.3.3 FireInvestigation.......................................................................................9.3.3 Fire Prevention and Education.................................................................9.3.3 The Juvenile Firesetter Intervention Program ..........................................9.3.3 Emergency Medical Services...................................................................9.3.3 Emergency Preparedness........................................................................9.3.3 Priorities and Implementation Strategies ..................................................9.3.4 9.4 Parks & Recreation....................................................................................................... 9.4.1 Inventory of Existing Facilities ................................................................................9.4.4 Standards and Guidelines.....................................................................................9.4.13 CitizenSurvey........................................................................................................9.4.15 Priorities and Implementation Strategies...............................................................9.4.18 9.5 Solid Waste..................................................................................................................9.5.1 Solid Waste Collection...........................................................................................9.5.1 Recycling................................................................................................................9.5.2 EnvironmentalEducation.......................................................................................9.5.3 IllegalDumping......................................................................................................9.5.3 HazardousWaste..................................................................................................9.5.3 CitizenSurvey........................................................................................................9.5.4 Priorities and Implementation Strategies...............................................................9.5.5 9.6 Public Works StreetConditions...................................................................................................9.6.1 Street Signs, Signals and Markings.......................................................................9.6.1 Drainage and Flood Control...................................................................................9.6.1 Priorities and Implementation Strategies...............................................................9.6.2 9.7 Utility Service................................................................................................................9.7.1 Water..................................................................................................................9.7.1 Wastewater............................................................................................................ 9.7.15 Priorities and Implementation Strategies...............................................................9.7.17 9.8 Building Inspections & Code Compliance.....................................................................9.8.1 Priorities and Implementation Strategies...............................................................9.8.1 9.9 Libraries and The Arts...................................................................................................9.9.1 Library..................................................................................................................9.9.1 TheArts..................................................................................................................9.9.2 CitizenSurvey........................................................................................................9.9.4 Priorities and Implementation Strategies ...............................................................9.9.5 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan 9.10 Social Services ........................................................................................................... 9.10.1 Allen Community Outreach .................................................................................... 9.10.1 Allen Community Alliance ...................................................................................... 9.10.3 Allen Ministenal Alliance ........................................................................................ 9.10.3 State Attorney General .......................................................................................... 9.10.3 Collin County Committee on Aging ........................................................................ 9.10.3 SamaritanInn ......................................................................................................... 9.10.3 Texas Workforce Commission ............................................................................... 9.10.3 SeniorCitizens ....................................................................................................... 9.10.4 Hope's Door ........................................................................................................... 9.10.4 CitizenSurvey........................................................................................................ 9.10.4 Priorities and Implementation Strategies ................................................. ............. 9.10.5 9.11 Educational Facilities & Services................................................................................. 9.11.1 CitizenSurvey........................................................................................................ 9.11.4 Priorities and Implementation Strategies ............................................................. - 9.11.4 10. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT 11. IMPLEMENTATION APPENDIX "A" — Survey 10.1 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Maps, Tables and Figures Maps Em 1.1. Location .............................................................................................................. 1.1 2.1. Percent Population under 5 years ...................................................................... 2.4 2.2. Percent Population over 18 ................................................................................ 2.4 2.3. Percent Population Age 20-24 ........................................................................... 2.5 2.4. Percent Population Age 25-44 ........................................................................... 2.5 2.5. Percent Population Age 45-64 ........................................................................... 2.6 2.6. Percent Population 65 and older ........................................................................ 2.6 2.7. Ethnicity — Percent Asian ................................................................................... 2.7 2.8. Ethnicity— Percent African American ................................................................. 2.7 2.9. Ethnicity — Percent White/Anglo (includes Hispanic) .........................................2.8 2.10. Ethnicity — Percent Hispanic ........................................... ........ ......................... 2.8 3.1. Neighborhood Planning Districts ........................................................................ 3.1 3.2. Existing Developed Acreage — Use Subdivision Map ........................................3.4 3.3. Future Land Use .......... ..................................................................................... 3.6 3.1.1. CBD Existing Land Uses ................................................................... ................ 3.1.2 3.1.2. CBD Street Classifications ................................................................................. 3.1.3 3.1.3. CBD Sidewalks .................................................................................................. 3.1.6 3.1.4. Infrastructure improvements .............................................................................. 3.1.7 3.1.5. CBD Subdistricts ................................................................................................ 3.1.8 3.1.6. CBD Design Districts .......................................................................................... 3.1.9 4.1. Thoroughfare Plan ............................................................................................. 4.2 4.2. Alternative Transportation/Recreational Trail Plan ............................................4.10 6.1. Technology District ............................................................................................. 6.6 7.1. Topography ....... ................................................................................................ 7.2 7.2. Soils ................................................................................................................... 7.4 7.3. Vegetation ..................................................................... .................................... 7.8 7.4. Wildlife ................................................................................................................ 7.10 8.1. Existing Street Hierarchy ................................................................................... 8.4 8.2. The Outer Zone .................................................................................................. 8.6 8.3. The Approach Zone ........................................................................................... 8.10 8.4. The Core Zone ................................................................................................... 8.16 8.5. McDermott/Main Ceremonial Drive ....................... ............................................ 8.20 8.6. Allen Historic Village .......................................................................................... 8.26 9.3.1. Existing and Proposed Fire Station .... ..................... ......................................... 9.3.2 9.4.1. Park Master Plan ................................................................................................ 9.4.8 9.4.2. Private Recreational Facilities ............................................................................ 9.4.12 9.7.1 Future Water Improvements .................................................................... : ......... 9.7.3 9.7.2. Wastewater Collection System Capital Improvement Plan ...............................9.7.16 9.11.1 Schools and Districts ......................................................................................... 9.11.2 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Tables Peale 2.1. Demographic Profile ........................................................................................... 2.1 2.2. Ten Year Maximum Population Estimates .........................................................2.2 2.3. Ten Year Actual Populations ............................................................................. 2.2 2.4. Build -out Forecast .............................................................................................. 2.3 2.5. Comparative Population Estimates .................................................................... 2.3 2.6, Percentage Household Income .......................................................................... 2.3 3.1. Comparative Acreage & Development ............................................................... 3.1 3.2. Developed Acreage 2002 .................................................................................. 3.2 3.3. Percentage of Developed Land by NPD 2002 ...................................................3.3 3.4. Ultimate Development ...................................................................... : ................. 3.7 3.5. Relationship of Zoning Districts to Land Use Plan Categories ..........................3.10 4.1. Thoroughfare Design Standards ........................................................................ 4.3 4.2. Thoroughfare Design Standards ........................................................................ 4.4 4.3. Thoroughfare Improvement Plan ....................................................................... 4.5 4.4. Summary of Regional Trails ............................................................................... 4.11 4.5. Allen Trail Loops ................................................................................................ 4.11 4.6. Citizen Survey - Commute to Work .............................................. ........ ........... 4A2 4.7. Citizen Survey - Utilization of Mass Transit ......................................................4.13 5.1. Trends in Housing Types ................................................................................... 5.1 5.2. Housing Tenure .................................................................................................. 5.2 5.3. Typical Residential Value ................................................................................... 5.3 5.4. Ten -Year Estimate of Single Family Residential Construction ..........................5.4 5.5. Reasons for not selecting next home in Allen ....................................................5.5 5.6. Percentage Factors in Choice of a Home ..........................................................5.5 5.7. Square Footage of"next home ......................................................................... 6.6 5.8. Housing Need in Percentage ............................................................................. 5.6 5.9. Choice of Neighborhoods .................................................................................. 5.7 6.1. AEDC Projects........................................................................................ .......... 6.5 6.2. ACDC Projects ................................................................................................... 6.7 6.3. ACDC Funding Preferences .............................................................................. 6.8 6.4. Support for Additional Development .................................................................. 6.8 6.5. Citizen Support for allowing Alcohol Sales (1997) .............................................6.9 7.1. Summary of Species .......................................................................................... 7.6 7.2. Trees in Allen ..................................................................................................... 7.9 7.3. Reptiles in Grasslands... .................................................................................... 7.11 7.4. Birds in Grasslands .................................................................... ....................... 7.12 7.5. Mammals in Grasslands .................................................................................... 7.14 7.6. Reptiles in Forestlands.. .................................................................................... 7.15 7.7. Birds in Forestlands ........................................................................................... 7.15 7.8. Mammals in Forestlands ............................................ ....................................... 7.17 7.9. Reptiles in Wetlands .......................................................................................... 7.17 7.10. Birds in Wetlands ............................................................................................... 7.18 7.11. Mammals in Wetlands ........................................................................................ 7.18 7.12. Fish in Waterbodies ........................................................................................... 7.19 7.13. Reptiles in Waterbodies ..................................................................................... 7.20 7.14. Birds in Waterbodies .......................................................................................... 7.20 8.1. Citizen Survey .................................................................................................... 8.26 8.2. City Control of Design ............... ........................................................................ 8.27 9.1.1. Citizen Survey - Voting ............................................................................... ... -.9.1.2 9.2.1. Citizen Attitudes toward Crime ............................................................... ........... 9.2.5 9.2.2. Citizen Rating of Animal Control ........................................................................ 9.2.5 9.3.1. Selected Statistics .............................................................................................. 9.3.3 9.4.1. Summary of City Park Facilities/Acreage..........................................................9.4.4 9.4.2. Inventory of Parks & improvements ................................................................... 9.4.5 9.4.3. School District Recreational Facilities ................................................................ 9.4.9 9.4.4. Inventory of Private Recreational Facilities ........................................................9.4.10 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan 9.4.5. Park Land Requirements and Standards ........................................................... 9.4.13 9.4.6. Park Facilities Requirements ............................................................................. 9.4.14 9.4.7. Citizen Survey -Percentage Most Frequently Used Facilities ..........................9.4.15 9.4.8. Citizen Survey- Percentage Most Frequently Used Programs ........................9.4.15 9.4.9. Citizen Survey- Percent Support for additional Park land by Type ..................9.4.16 9.4.10. Citizen Survey - Percent Support for New Facilities .........................................9.4.16 9.4.11. Percentage of Respondents attending events in other Cities ............................9.4.17 9.4.12. Participation in Organized Programs ................................................................. 9.4.18 9.6.1. Street Conditions ................................... ....................... .................................... 9.6.1 9.7.1. Water Consumption Data ................................................................................... 9.7.1 9.7.2. Customers and Average Consumption .............................................................. 9.7.1 9.7.3. Ten Year Additional Consumption Forecast without Conservation ...................9.7.2 9.7.4. Water Distribution Facilities ............................................................................... 9.7.2 9.7.5. Water Lines - Existing ....................................................................................... 9.7.4 9.7.6. Water Lines - Future ......................................................................................... 9.7.12 9.7.7. Facilities - Existing and Future .......................................................................... 9.7.14 9.7.8. Wastewater Basin Data ..................................................................................... 9.7.15 9.7.9. Basin Population Summary ............................................................................. -.9.7.15 9.9.1. Survey - Library Activity ..................................................................................... 9.9.1 9.9.2. Survey - Library Rating Guide ...... .............................. ..................................... 9.9.1 9.9.3. Survey- Facility Attendance ............................................................................. 9.9.4 9.10.1. Survey - Opinions on Social Services ............................................................... 9.10.4 9.11.1. AISD Enrollment.. .................................... ............ .......... ........ - ....................... 9.11.1 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Figures PAN 2.1. Population Trends .................................................................................................... 2.2 4.1. Citizen Survey-Commute....................................................................................... 4.12 5.1. Trends in New Single Family Construction .............................................................. 5.2 5.2. Citizen Survey ........................................................................................................... 5.7 5.3. Perceptions of Trash and Litter Collection ............................................................... 5.7 6.1. Non Residential Building Permits ...................... ...................................................... 6.1 6.2. Gross sales by Industry............................................................................................ 6.1 6.3. Retail Sales by Industry ............................................................................................ 6.2 6.4. Gross Sales by Major Industries ............................................................................... 6.2 6.5. Unemployment ......................................................................................................... 6.3 6.6. Consumer Price Index .............................................................................................. 6.3 6.7. Sales Tax Receipts ................................................................................................... 6.3 8.1. Outer Zone Intersection ............................................................................................ 8.7 8.2. Outer Zone Parkway ................................................................................................. 8.8 8.3. Outer Zone Landscape ............................................................................................. 8.8 8.4. Riparian and Trail Zone ............................................................................................ 8.10 8.5. Approach Zone Intersection .. ................................................................................... 8.11 8.6. Light Standards ..... .................................................................................................. 8.12 8.7. Approach Zone Parkway .......................................................................................... 8.13 8.8. Approach Zone Landscape ...................................................................................... 8.14 8.9. Icon...........................................................................................................................8.16 8.10. Core Zone Intersection ............................................................................................. 8.17 8.11. Core Zone Parkway .................................................................................................. 8.18 8.12. Core Zone Landscape .............................................................................................. 8.19 8.13. Core Zone Landscape .............................................................................................. 8.20 8.14. Existing Shoebox Light Standard ............................................................................. 8.21 8.15. Altered Light Standard .............................................................................................. 8.21 8.16. CBD Intersection ...................................................................................................... 8.22 8.17. The Allen Star Gateway ............................................................................................ 8.23 8.18. The Allen Star Gateway ............................................................................................ 8.24 8.19. Citizen Survey- Appearance of Properties .............................................................. 8.27 9.2.1. Traffic Incident .......................................................................................................... 9.2.2 9.2.2. Citations .................................................................................................................... 9.2.2 9.2.3. Part I Crimes against Persons .................................................................................. 9.2.3 9.2.4. Part I Crimes against Property ................................................................................. 9.2.3 9.2.5. Part 11 Offenses .......................................................................................................... 9.23 9.2.6. Calls for Animal Control ............................................................................................ 9.2.4 9.2.7. Cases filed in Municipal Court .................... ................................................... ......... 9.2.4 9.4.1. Allen Station Park Concept Plan .......................................................... __ ............... 9.4.3 9.4.2. Citizen Rating of Park Maintenance ......................................................................... 9.4.17 9.4.3. Citizen Rating of City Parks .................................................... ................................. 9.4.17 9.5.1. Tons of Solid Waste Landfilled ................................................................................. 9.5.1 9.5.2. Tons of Recycled Materials ......... ............................................................................ 9.5.2 9.5.3. Per household Recycling by Month .......................................................................... 9.5.2 9.5.4. Citizen Rating of Garbage Collection Services ........................................................9.5.4 9.5.5. Rating Brush & Large Item Pick-up .......................................................................... 9.5.4 9.9.1. Library Activity .......................................................................................................... 9.9.1 9.9.2. Library Volumes ........................................................................................................ 9.22 9.9.3. Volumes per 1000 Library Cardholders .................................................................... 9.9.2 9.11.1. Citizen Survey - Rating of AISID ............................................................................... 9.11.4 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Overview Allen's Vision for the Future The 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan developed during 2002 reflects the City's commitment to comprehensive, coordinated and continuous planning practice. The process provides for periodic updates at intervals of three years and a comprehensive reevaluation every five years. While the 2002- 2022 Comprehensive Plan is a new plan, it builds on the work of previous plans and the policies of the City Council. The dedication and hard work of the Planning & Zoning Commission, the City Council and many members of the public included articulating a vision for the future: "The City of Allen is dedicated to providing efficient quality services by working in partnership with its citizens, neighborhoods, and businesses to enhance the quality of life and to create a safe, healthy, vibrant community in which to live, work, play and visit." The U.S. Census Bureau's decennial Census results in 2000 correspond closely with the estimates of the North Central Texas Council of Governments and the City's own estimates. During the period between Census counts (1990-2000) the City of Allen experienced unprecedented growth in its residential population as well as an expansion in its commercial base. An increase in the diversity of its population has accompanied its overall growth, and the population is more mature with a median age of 31.4 years. Household size has declined from 3.11 persons/household to 3.07 persons per household. An estimated population of 97,938 is projected for the City at the time of full development. Median household income increased significantly since the 1990 Census to $78,924 with per capita income increasing to $28,575. Land Use The City continues its commitment to stable residential neighborhoods with residential development over 90% builtout during the next five years. During this period of rapid growth, the City has nevertheless acquired significant dedication of floodplain land and continues to maintain these properties in their natural state, while utilizing the areas as linear parks and greenbelts. Land use planning has followed traditional planning theory in establishing single-family residential uses as the most protected category, buffered by increasingly intense uses of townhome, multi -family and garden office, while commercial activity is limited to areas along major transportation arterials, and concentrated at major intersections. Commercial development has remained stable, with increasing possibilities arising from imminent improvements along S.H. 121. In accordance with local priorities, residential development has not been permitted within 1,200 feet of S.H. 121. Significant changes in the zoning in transitional areas should be accompanied by an amendment to the Future Land Use Plan. CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD) Single-family residential uses have declined in number, and the quality of housing has deteriorated as a result of expansion of the regional roadway system (U.S. 75 and McDermott Drive) and policies forbidding new single-family residential development. Nevertheless, the condition of most residential properties ranges from fair to good. New commercial development is generally limited to low-density single -story retail and office located on small tracts. The majority of this development is concentrated along Allen Drive north of Main Street and includes professional offices and medical supply and service. Parking remains an issue for commercial and institutional uses on Main Street between the railroad tracks and Allen Drive. Off-street parking has generally been provided in all commercial development since the CBD was established in 1983. Improving the street system in the CBD plays a significant role in the downtown revitalization process. Currently, McDermott Drive is the only access road from the east and the west sides of the City going to the CBD. Although Cedar Drive connects the CBD area north to Exchange Parkway, the capacity of Cedar Drive is limited because of the sharp curves, and improvements to Allen Drive will eliminate the unsafe curve. Internal circulation within the CBD area will be improved with the construction of St. Mary Drive from Allen Drive to SH 5. 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Overview Sidewalks should be constructed throughout the CBD of sufficient width to encourage pedestrian traffic and extension of the trail system utilized to improve access to other parts of the community. To improve the CBD experience, careful attention should be paid to design elements of sidewalks, street lighting and landscaping, as well as to the provision of amenities for the pedestrian, including benches, drinking fountains and trash receptacles. To spur reinvestment in the CBD, it is anticipated that reconstruction of local streets and utilities needs to be a priority. The City's ability to plan for the financing and coordination of construction will improve the marketability and desirability of the CBD as a commercial destination. Transportation The City has made significant progress in the implementation of the Thoroughfare Plan since 1998 with completion of McDermott Drive, Alma Drive, West Bethany Drive, West Stacy Road, and S.H. 5. The community's investment in its roadway system also requires that it protect roadway capacity to maintain a Level of Service (LOS) "C." The capacity of thoroughfares is reduced by poorly controlled intersecting roadways, driveways and alleys. Maintaining capacity is accomplished through median and marginal access control, requirements for mutual access easements on private property developed for non- residential purposes, through roadway design and intersection improvements. The City has also made an additional commitment to developing alternative modes of transportation, including bicycle routes and recreational trails. The implications for a regional trail system have the potential of expanding access well beyond the corporate boundaries. During the Citizen Survey conducted in the summer of 2002, over 60% of respondents supported rail transit, although less than 25% felt it "Likely" that they would ride a bus if provided. Over 70% of respondents reported that they would be "Very Likely" to "Somewhat Likely" to use transit for special events, while over 50% of respondents believed that the City should join DART, with 46.5% supporting the use of sales taxes (City, AEDC and ACDC) to support funding for transportation. NEIGHBORHOODS & HOUSING Residential neighborhoods are the core of the community. The continued integrity of these neighborhoods is a very high priority. Homeownership is a key element in preserving older neighborhoods, as is a commitment to code enforcement and property maintenance. Allen's older neighborhoods are generally 25 to 30 years old, with smaller residential units typical of a suburban bedroom community where housing was most affordable. More recent developments and increases in disposable income have resulted in low-density single-family detached housing catering to a relatively affluent population. Aesthetics, environmental preservation and neighborhood amenities are the most signifcent characteristics of new development in 2002. While this trend is generally antithetical to widely touted principles of "smart growth," examples of various new urbanism concepts are currently under development. Their form returns to the more traditional grid, incorporating public open space in a formal pattern, but carefully limiting undesirable traffic. Allen's residential neighborhoods are generally centered around neighborhood elementary schools, and are combined with neighborhood parks where reasonable to do so. An important part of planning these neighborhoods has been the requirement to provide linkages between the neighborhoods by both local streets and a system of trails and greenbelts linking parks and schools. It is probably these amenities that are most lacking in the older subdivisions. Allen's reputation as a prestige community, bolstered by an excellent public school system is, however, at odds with the community's desire to provide a wide range of housing types, including "affordable" housing. It is for this reason that the preservation of the older neighborhoods, characterized by smaller homes and lots, is considered a high priority. It will be necessary to continue to upgrade infrastructure in several of these neighborhoods. The City should evaluate options to increase the levels of homeownership and to encourage the establishment of homeowner associafions in areas where none exist. Continued emphasis on code compliance and property maintenance is recommended. Attached and multi -family housing is a clear alternative to expensive single-family detached housing where shared property maintenance may increase affordability. To the extent that the supply of this type 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Overview of housing is market-driven based on a regional demand, the City may encourage the preservation of existing units and the creation of new units in higher density mixed use developments. The City should assist in the development of neighborhood associations in neighborhoods where none exist. A plan for the preservation of each neighborhood should be established in conjunction with that group. Even though older neighborhoods do not have common areas for maintenance that require fees, the formation of homeowner associations would create neighborhood cohesion and the mechanism for communication and assistance in resolving neighborhood issues. Homeownership should be encouraged. Two homeownership programs sponsored by the Department of Housing & Urban Development are directed toward assisting professional police officers and teachers, provided they remain in the home for at least three years. The City may wish to consider other forms of assistance for prospective purchasers in targeted residential redevelopment areas. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Recent years have seen the growth of economic development as a legitimate function of city government in partnership with the private sector. Economic development for jobs, for needed goods and services for residents, and for tax base to sustain the community have become so visible and important that communities can no longer afford to leave them to chance. Allen's efforts have been directed toward influencing the quality, mix and level of economic units and offering incentives to lure industry and commerce into Allen. The strength of the Allen economy can be seen in the diversification that has occurred since 1990, and through the efforts of the Allen Economic Development Corporation (AEDC) and the Allen Community Development Corporation (ACDC). The city has benefited from 24 new major industries along with the development of major retail centers including the Allen Premium Outlets, Allen Central Market and Twin Creeks Village. The City's diversification has attracted other services including Presbyterian Hospital - Allen and the Hilton Hotel. Many improvements provided through the ACDC have resulted in an increase in the economic welfare of the City. ENVIRONMENT Geological formations, topography, soils and climate define many of the communities characteristics, including plant and wildlife diversity. Preserving the sensitive ecological system through pollution prevention activities is a high priority. URBAN DESIGN In a rapidly urbanizing area, it has been important for the City to retain its individual identity and character in a visual manner. The Streetscape Image Study provides a framework for utilizing transportation corridors as identity markers, guiding residents and visitors toward the City center to create a uniquely "Allen" experience. Both roadways and the many creeks are utilized to create an image through the use of plantings, pavement treatments, street lighting and public accoutrements. COMMUNITY FACILITIES & SERVICES Government. The City's many Boards and Commissions provide a diversity of ideas and the basis for participatory activity guiding the City's future and development. Providing responsive service and transparent policies continues to be of primary importance. Technology now provides additional avenues to provide service, disseminate information and solicit feedback from the community. A continued commitment to making full use of available technology will allow for effective and efficient local government operations. Community Policing The City has committed to the precepts of Community Policing as a philosophy and an organizational strategy that allows the police and residents to work closely together in new ways to solve the problems of crime, fear of crime, physical and social disorder, and neighborhood decay. The Police Department has met many new challenges resulting from the City's expansive growth, and continues to formulate positive responses to its community responsibilities and external threats. Its many programs have been successful in creating community awareness and active citizen participation in neighborhood safety. 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Overview Fire Advanced planning has left the Allen Fire Department well equipped to meet the challenges of growth. The regional growth in the area provides expanded opportunities for interlocal cooperation to ensure that present and future needs of the community are met, particularly in handling external threats and emergencies. Employee training and development continues to be a high priority. Parks & Recreation Parks and open space is central to Allen as a unique place. The City currently exceeds lands to meet the needs of its curent population, but has continued challenges to meet the needs of a build -out population and the standards of operational excellence already established in a sustainable manner. Cooperative partnerships with county and regional recreational interests are expected to provide opportunities for continued growth of the park system. Solid Waste Collection The City should continue to contract with a reliable, efficient, environmentally -minded waste hauling firm for solid waste and recycling collection services. It is recommended that efforts continue to expand recycling, to provide educational opportunities to the citizens of the community through outreach programs, to eliminate illegal dumping and to divert household hazardous waste from the waste stream. Streets The condition rating of the majority of streets in new subdivisions and arterial roadways constructed within the last ten years is excellent, although a few older neighborhoods should be reconstructed within the near future. A systematic means of maintenance should be established to retard deterioration in all roadways and maximize the community's investment in its infrastructure. The City follows the national guidelines outlined in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices which includes traffic signs, pavement markings, and traffic signals. Drainage and Flood Control A Drainage Utility Fee offsets the costs of gutter repair, street sweeping and regular mowing of low lying and detention areas and to correct drainage issues. These measures are expected to become increasingly important in the City's efforts to comply with the requirements of the Texas Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit. Heavily wooded areas along major streams are generally left in a natural state for environmental reasons, and the City's requirement for the dedication of the fully urbanized floodplain has avoided adverse impacts on local drainage with few exceptions. Potable Water Water is supplied and wastewater treated by the North Texas Municipal Water District. The City is responsible for water distribution and wastewater collection. The City's goal is to maintain a Superior Water Supply rating from the Texas Commission on Environmental Duality. The City should continue to seek alternatives to the use of potable water for irrigation in anticipation of future regional shortages. Wastewater Wastewater treatment and trunk collection lines are provided by the North Texas Municipal Water District. The District's planning process provides for expansion of the system to meet the needs of the community at full development. Building & Code Compliance The importance of building inspections in ensuring community safety will continue beyond the period of rapid growth. As the City reaches maturity, environmental health and code enforcement activities are expected to become increasingly important. 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Overview Library The new Allen Public Library is expected to meet the needs of the community at full development, although the traditional medium of books and periodicals will compete with electronic media with library patrons. Continued participation in the regional library system will be important if the volume and diversity of community interests is to be met, as well as increasing outreach activities. The Arts Allen provides a venue for a surprising number of arts -related activities for its size, including the Allen Philharmonic Symphony Orchestra and the Allen Symphony Chorus, The Allen Arts Alliance and Arts Guild provides financial support and volunteers for many arts organizations and events. The Arts of Collin County is a group of citizens representing the Cities of Plano, Allen, Frisco, and McKinney, working to provide an arts facility that would serve all four communities in Collin County. The study has indicated that a site of 80 to 100 acres would successfully isolate the facilities from adjacent land uses, provide ample parking and space for future facilities, and set the arts hall in a naturalistic setting befitting a centerpiece project for Collin County. Social Services As the City matures, social services become more important in maintaining a high quality of life. The Ministerial Alliance, the Allen Community Outreach program, the Senior Citizen programs, and such State support services as the State Attorney General's Child Support Office and the Texas Workforce Commission provide services in Allen proper. Other services are provided through Collin County with programs such as Hope's Door (Women's Shelter) and the Samaritan Inn. EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES & SERVICES The City of Allen is located within four school districts: the Allen Independent School District (AISD), McKinney Independent School District (MISD), Lovejoy Independent School District (LISDS) and the Plano Independent School District (PISD). School age children living within the boundaries of these districts attend schools provided by the Districts. Children living in LISD also attend grades 7-12 in AISD schools. There is no residential development located in the portion of MISD that is within the city of Allen. The Collin County Community College District (CCCCD) includes all of Allen. The administrative office are located in the Spring Creek Campus and satellite campuses are located in Plano, McKinney, and Frisco. CCCCD's Allen campus at the Allen High School is home of the Center for Teaching, Learning and Professional Development (CLTPD). As the community matures, cooperation and joint planning for facilities and maintenance with all districts should be a high priority. IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES The 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan is a policy guide and the Allen City Council is primarily responsible for its implementation, either directly through Council action or through delegation to appointed Boards and Commissions or City Staff. Clearly the Council's ability to implement many strategies will be circumscribed by persons and events over which the City has little direct control. In this case, it is incumbent on community leaders to collaborate and coordinate its activities in the manner that serves the best interests of its citizens. 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan BACKGROUND Location The City of Allen is located in Collin County, Texas along US 75 approximately 15 miles north of IH 635 and is included as part of the Dallas Primary Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (PSMSA). Map 1.1 Location Historic Context The City was incorporated in 1953 and obtained home rule status in 1979 with a Council/Manager form of government. AComprehensive Plan was prepared for the City in the 1970's, but was never adopted. The fret Comprehensive Plan adopted by the City in 1985 was subsequently updated in 1992 and 1998. Each of these plans was used to guide the city's development over the years, and each is responsible for building the foundation of the present city. This Plan builds on that foundation. It seeks to incorporate the vision of its present residents in its future, much as the vision of earlier citizens created the Allen of 2002. Community Vision The City of Allen is dedicated to providing efficient quality services by working in partnership with its citizens, neighborhoods, and businesses to enhance the quality of life and to create a safe, healthy, vibrant community in which to live, work, play and visit. 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan HISTORY Author. Tom Keener, Cir, of Allen Library Prior to the arrival of the European and American immigrants into the Allen area, Caddo and Comanche Indian tribes inhabited the region. The Wichita confederacy of the Caddo tribe occupied much of the Red River and upper Trinity River Valleys. Caddo Indians were primarily agricultural and supplemented their livelihoods with hunting and fishing. They had a well-developed sign language, and highly cultivated cultural and political systems. Early explorers were greeted with the gracious hospitality of the Caddo. In contrast, the Comanche were a fence nomadic people who rode from the plains into the area, and were feared by both the Caddo and early settlers alike. The Indian tribes migrated westward as the early settlors entered the area and were eventually removed to the Indian territory to the north of the Red River. One of the last known conflicts between the early settlers and the Indians took place in 1844 along Rowlett Creek near the current railroad crossing when members of the Muncey, Jameson, and Rice families were killed during a raid. An historic marker is erected along S.H. 5 near Rowlett Creek to commemorate this event. Immigrants of European descent began arriving into the Allen area in the early 1840's. The principal means of access were the Texas Road and the Central National Road that were constructed by the Republic of Texas. The Texas Road followed what is currently Preston Road in western Collin County and the Central National Road originated in downtown Dallas and traveled through southeastern Collin Co. to Fort Gibson near Paris. A stage line ran from Bonham to McKinney and went south to Allen and Plano. It forded Rowlett Creek where S.H. 5 now crosses. Six to eight foot timbers were stuck into the ground every hundred yards so that the immigrants would know they were on the right path. The posts were peeled to the white bark to enhance their visibility. Land grants were given by the Republic of Texas as an inducement for settlers to come to the frontier, and one of those grants was the Peter's Colony which covered much of north central Texas including parts of Allen. It was in the Peters Colony that the infamous Hedgcoxe wars took place. The dispute centered around a compromise law that was enacted by the State legislature which gave the Peters Colony owner, the Texas Emigration and Land Company, certain rights for the disposition of property in the Colony. The Attorney General for the state of Texas, Ebenezer Allen, for whom the city of Allen is named, delivered an opinion which upheld the law. On July 25, 1852, a contingent of armed men raided the offices of the Peters Colony land agent, Henry Hedgcoxe, near McKinney and stole the files, books, and maps and forced him to leave the colony. The conflict was resolved when the legislature in special session amended its earlier law. By this act, colonists were able to secure their claims with the land office, and settlement of the area proceeded. The county's first grist mill was opened in Allen by the Wetsel family. Some of the early settlers were W.N. Bush, W.O. Matthews, J.M. Gibson, Geo. Mountcastle, James Spradling, G.W. Ford, and W.P. Yeary. The tremendous growth that took place in the 1840's and 1850's came to a grinding halt with the onset of the War between the States. Collin County overwhelmingly voted against secession, but once the state elected to secede by popular vote, the citizens were loyal to the Confederacy. Soldiers from the area began preparing for the war with practice drills at home. As the war continued, it was not uncommon for Confederate soldiers to bring their horses back for rest and grazing, help harvest the crops, and return to the battlefield after the harvest. Captain William Quantrill, who ran renegade and commando -type operations into Kansas, Ken- tucky, and Missouri from camps in Collin and Grayson Counties is known to have traveled through Allen and camped near Bethany Lakes. William N. Bush of Allen enlisted as a private in the Confederate army and was later promoted to Captain. His horse was shot from under him in Springfield, Missouri, and he was wounded at Pleasant Hill, Louisiana. He later served as county 1.2 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan commissioner and sheriff of Collin County. There was never military action in Allen, but letters of correspondence between soldiers and their loved ones demonstrate the sacrifices and support that local citizens gave to the troops. After the soldiers returned home, there would be two events that would drastically after the future of Allen—the railroad and telegraph. The Houston and Texas Central Railroad was constructed through Allen in 1872. The railroad facilitated the transport of people and agricultural products as well. The railroad needed water approximately every seven miles and Allen, as well as the towns of Plano, Richardson, and McKinney, were included in its regular stops. Its economic impact can be seen in the drastic increase in Collin County agricultural output from 1870-1900. Com, cattle, and cotton were among the chief products. The introduction of the railroad meant the concomitant construction of the telegraph which enhanced the exchange of communication and information with the rest of the country. The first train robbery in Texas took place in Allen on February 22, 1878 when Sam Bass and his associates pillaged the train and its crew. Allen was a short ride from their hideouts in the Elm Trinity brush lands. A member of the Bass gang, Tom Spotswood, entered Tom Newman's saloon (which was on the southeast comer of Main Sl. and the rail fine, Allen was wet until 1902) in the late aftemoon and asked when the southbound train arrived in Allen. They hid until Train No. 4's headlight glowed from the north at eight o'clock that evening. Four masked men approached the train platform and abducted the agent. While the train's wheels were slowly coming to a stop, two of the gunmen leaped onto the Sam Bass engine and astonished the engineer and fireman. The other two gunmen hastened to the baggage and express car, where the Texas Express Company's messenger, Jim Thomas (a cousin of the frontier marshal Heck Thomas), had just thrown open the door to transact business. Y .R3y�l: f1 eT __ __ Train Depot The gunmen ordered Thomas to come out or he would be shot, but he exhibited chivalrous defiance. The gunmen tried to enter the express car, but were met with an unexpected fusillade that tore off the hat of one of the gunmen. The two outlaws jumped under the car and then retreated to the platform, where the other pair of gunmen were holding the agent, engineer, and fireman. They took their captives and withdrew to the end of the baggage car where the engineer 1.3 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan pleaded with Thomas to surrender. He again demonstrated breve resistance and refused. Consequently, the gunmen had the engineer drive the engine backwards to loosen the coupling pin and separate the express and baggage car from the train. The engineer was then ordered to drive the engine forward 60 feet. The gunmen took the oil can and doused the express and baggage car and ignited it into a pyrogenic display. The engineer reiterated his request for surrender, but Thomas would only comply k the gunmen promised not to kill him. The gunmen promised not to kill him and the fire was extinguished. Thomas was ordered to open the safe and remove the parcels that contained approximately $1500. Towns along the Central route were frightened and excited about this event, which was a prelude to a series of train robberies by the Bass gang. Captain June Peak of the Texas Rangers was assigned the responsibility to capture the Bass gang. Sam Bass was later killed in Round Rock, Texas, after a monotonous pursuit by the Rangers. Churches and schools flourished in this period. They were simple structures that were often built of logs. Services were often conducted by circuit rider ministers that rode on horseback to many kxal congregations. In the hot summer, services were held outside. Several denominations often used the same building. The Baptist church was organized in 1878 and the Christian church was established in 1886. The Cottonwood School opened in 1865 with Mr. Owen Matthews as the instructor, the Bethany School opened in 1877 with G.F. Matthews as the instructor, and the Mustang School opened in 1851. The school was named for the wild mustangs that roamed in the area. These horses were probably descendants of renegade horses that belonged to early Spanish explorers. George Mountcesde opened a store in 1876 and W.P. Yeary established a barber shop in the same year. In 1908, the Texas Traction Company (Interurban) bulk an electric railway through Allen, which further enhanced passenger transportation to surrounding communities. The original station is still standing and an historic marker has been erected to commemorate the important contribution of this railway to Allen's history. Families and young adults would often have an evening outing by taking a round trip to Sherman or Dallas from the Allen station. Glimpses of the gilded age began to appear in Allen with the construction of the Baccus and Green houses (now located at the comer of Main and Bonham). A bank was opened, and the Allen Telephone Exchange began operation around the tum of the century. It was privately operated by local families until it was sold to Southwestern Bell in 1956. The exchange was located in the second floor of the existing Woodman's Hall, and because it offered an excellent view of the downtown area, local citizens would ring the operator to ascertain if a spouse or friend could be seen from the window. If so, the caller might ask the operator to relay a message to them. Prosperity came to a temporary end in 1915 when the town suffered from a devastating fire that destroyed most of the business district between the interurban tracts and the Railroad. Allen remained an agricultural community during the world wars and depression era. Two diesel - operated cotton gins were constructed and operated until they closed in the 1950's. Allen lost five citizens in the world wars who gave the supreme sacrifice of their lives - John Floyd in World War I and Joseph Holley, Marcel Cain, Rudd Mann, and Charles Jeans in World War 11. The interurban closed in 1948 and the importance of agriculture to the economic base of Allen began to diminish after the Second World War. The population declined to 400 in 1950. A lumber yard was opened after the Second World War. The town was officially incorporated in 1953 with Virgil Watson as the first Mayor. Similar in importance to the construction of the railroad almost a century before was the completion of U.S. 75 through Allen in 1960. Citizens could work at nearby companies because of the access and convenience of the highway. The relocation of high technology companies to the North Dallas and Richardson areas in the 1960's drastically increased employment opportunities for Allen's citizens, and the population rose to 8,324 in 1980. The 1990 census indicated a population of 19,198, and in 2000 it was 43,561. 1.4 2002-2022 Compfehensim Plan 2. STATISTICS AND FORECASTS 2002 Population The U.S. Census Bureau's decennial Census results in 2000 correspond closely with the estimates of the North Central Texas Council of Governments and the city's own estimates. During the period between Census counts (1990-2000) the City of Allen experienced unprecedented growth in its residential population as well as an expansion in its commercial base. An increase in the diversity of its population has accompanied its overall growth as illustrated in the following table: TABLE 2.1. DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE - 1990 2000 % Change Population 19,198 43,561 1269 Total Housing Units 6,173 15,227 146.7 Average Population/Household 3.1 3.07 (1.28) Ethnicity White 93.2% 87.1% (6.1) Hispanic Origin (of any race) 4.4% 7.0% 2.6 Black 3.2% 4.4% 1.2 Asian/Pacific Islander 3.7% - Other 3.6% 4.2% 0.6 Age of Population 0-17 35.7% 34.9% (0.8) 18-24 7% 5.5% (1.5) 25-44 44.3% 40.6% (3.7) 4584 10.3% 16.2% 5.9 65 8 Over 2.7% 2.8% 0.1 (Average) Median Age (in years) (26.5) 31.4 - Households by Type Total Households Family households (families) Mamed-couple families Other family Female head of household Nonfamily households Householder Living Alone Householder over 65 Living Alone 5,896 5,048 4,466 154 428 848 714 134 14,205 12,045 10,598 - 1,054 2,160 1,694 230 140.9 138.6 137.3 - 146.3 1547 1373 716 Average Household size 3.11 3.07 Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census 2.1 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Trends in population are indicated on Figure 2.1. Figure 2.1. Population Trends Sousa: Department of Planning 8 Development Population Forecast 2002-2022 The population forecast by the City of Allen for the 20 -year planning period is compared with forecasts by other agencies, including the NCTCOG and the Texas Water Development Board on Table 2.5. The city has forecast a maximum population of 97,938 persons. Table 2.3. adjusts this number for an approximate housing occupancy of 97% for single family detached housing and 95% for multifamily. Build -out is expected to occur prior to the end of the 2022 forecast period. Table 2.2. Ten -Year Maximum Population Estimate Source: Depadmeni of Planning 8 Development Population is forecast based on the number of housing units. Single-family units under construction are generally complete within four months from the date the permit is issued. Forecast numbers shown on Table 2.2 assume a maximum population for each period, since no vacancy rate was applied. Table 2.3. Ten -Year Actual Population Estimate Ocw enc 2002 1 2003 1 2004 1 2005 1 2006 1 2007 1 2008 2009 T2010 F2011T20121 97% F Population 51,7 56,34 60, 64,81 68, 71,08 73,474 75,411 77,13 78,41 79,3 F Population 7, 8,07 11,961 13,837 15,01 15,010 15,010 15,01 15,01 15,01 15,01 Total 59, 64,41 72, 78,657 83,094 86,099 88,484 90,421 92,149 93,426 94,40 Source: Depadmeni of Planning 8 Development Population is forecast based on the number of housing units. Single-family units under construction are generally complete within four months from the date the permit is issued. Forecast numbers shown on Table 2.2 assume a maximum population for each period, since no vacancy rate was applied. Table 2.3. Ten -Year Actual Population Estimate Ocw enc 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 97% SF 5019 54 853 68.70 62.87 66.041 68,956 71,269 73.1 74,82578 OB 77 011 95% MF 8982 7887 11382 1314 1426 14.26014,260142 14,26014 14 Total 57 174 82 31 70,091 —.-IJ 80301 83,21 ____9 87,4-1 89 90 323 91 27 Source: Depadmeni of Planning 8 Development 2.2 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Table 2.4. Build -out Forecast Build -out Population % 97% Occupancy Single-family 83,678 85.4 95% Occupancy Multi -family 14,260 148 Total 97,938 100.0 Source Dwartmenl of Planning B Development Table 2.5. Comparative Estimates 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2025 2030 City 1,940 8,314 19,315 43,561 89,084 97,938 97,938 97,938 NCTCOG 1,940 8,314 19,315 43,554 - - 89,050 - TVJDB $150,000-$199,999 0.5 18,309 44,000 80,000 106,300 - 117,000 Income Income information from the U.S. Census, published in July 2002, is compared with data from the previous Census on Table 2.6. TABLE 2.6 Percentage Household Income Comparison 1990 1999 Under $10,000 2.7 12 $10,000-$14,999 2.8 1.1 $15,000-$19,999 8.3 3.6 $20,000-$24,999 11.9 59 $25,000 - $49,999 28.1 11.6 $50,000$74,999 34.3 22.5 $75,000-$99,999 8.9 22.2 $100,000-$149,999 24 22.3 $150,000-$199,999 0.5 6.0 $200,000 or more n/a 32 Median Household Income $47,869 $78,924 Median Family Income $49,984 $82,787 Per Capita Income $16,040 $28,575 Source: US Census Age The age distribution provided by the 2000 Census and shown on Table 2.1 indicates that while the percentage of persons under the age of 18 has remained about the same, the adult population is older. Distribution of that population within the City is illustrated graphically in the following maps (2.1.1 through 2.1.6.). 2.3 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan MAP 2.1 Percent Population under 5 Years Map 2.2. Percent Population over 18 Years �� rir�rrr aw �rw T 11 A Map 2.2. Percent Population over 18 Years 2.4 11 2.4 2002.2022 Comprehensive Plan Map 2.3. Percent Population 20-24 Years Map 2.4. Percent Population 25-04 Years 2.5 Ali Map 2.4. Percent Population 25-04 Years 2.5 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Map 2.5. Percent Population 45-64 Years Map 2.6. Percent Population 65 Years and Over 2.6 r t A Map 2.6. Percent Population 65 Years and Over 2.6 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Race & Ethnicity The increased diversity of the population shown by the population data does not fully explain the concentration of ethnic groups within the city. Maps 2.7 through 2.10 show the location of major ethnic and language groups by Census block. Map 2.7. Percent Asian Population. Map 2.8. Percent Black/African American A Map 2.8. Percent Black/African American 2.7 ��r I 2.7 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Map 2.9. Percent White/Anglo Map 2.10. Percent Hispanic. IswcwM no �� s A 1 r ` Map 2.10. Percent Hispanic. w IswcwM no �� s A w 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan 3. LAND USE Neighborhood Planning Districts The City has divided its total area into 31 Neighborhood Planning Districts (NPD) illustrated on Map 3.1. Information concerning individual NPDs is summarized on Table 3.2.. Map 3.1. Neighborhood Planning Districts W 1I.3017 The 1998 Comprehensive Plan included an unsceled Land Use Map. Calculations were based on gross acreage and made no allowance for floodplain areas that cannot be developed. Tabular summaries included in that Plan do not always correspond to the map, which has made comparison between the present and eariier Plan difficult, particulady in distinguishing between low (LDR) and medium (MDR) density residential uses. Land Use 2002 Existing developed land uses are shown on Map 3.2. The map shows property that has been platted for specific uses as of January 1, 2002. Residential property, while platted, may not be fully developed. Table 3.1. summarizes the acreage and percentage of development by land use compared with data from earlier Plans. Table 3.1. Comparative Acreage and Development 1998-2002 Source: Department of Planning S Development 3.1 LDRIMDR HDR Commercial Retail Office Industrial PubhU Quasi PuNic Greenbelt Total 1999 5429. Mae 442.W 20.10 30390 1,044.20 7,373. % 73.8 18% 6.0% 0.3% 4.1% 142% 0.0% 100.0 2002 584187 207.89 541.69 180.66 34121 1,175. 70.89 8359.2 % 69.9% 2.5% 6.5% 2.2% 4.1% 14.1% 0.8% 100. Source: Department of Planning S Development 3.1 2002-2022 Comprahans/m Plan Table 3 2. shows the acreage of developed land by NPD. Source: Department of Planning B Development 3.2 Table 3.2. 2002 Developed Acreage Estimate NPD LDRIMDR Commeraal HDR Recall Office Industrial Publid Quasi Public Greenbelt Tata] 1 00 OW ON 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.DO 0.0 2 00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ooo ON 0.0 3 0.0 0.001 0.00 0.00 000 61.89 000 61.8 4 00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.Oc 5 0.0 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.30 0,001 1.301 8 109.8 oOd ON 0.00 0.00 1.62 0.00 111.4 7 428.5 31,04 18.34 000 0.00 41.40 0.00 519. 8 214.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4O.M MIN 255. 9 61.9 0.00 0.00 0.0 ON 3.48 0.56 88.0 10 0.0 0.00 0.00 ON O.w ON ON 0. 11 0.0 0. n.w 000 0.00 69.23 0.00 148.0 12 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 15.28 0.00 15.2 13 134.1 0.00 0.56 7.31 10,00 22.13 OoD 174.1 14 155.2 0.00 149 5.7 ON 8.96 9.97 178.4 15 659.1 ON 0 DO 0.00 000 10.89 35. 705.3 16 210.9d NMI 37.5 0.00 o.od 31.86 0. 349. 17 0.00 O.Od 53.3 0.00 0.0 30.79 0.01 84.11 18 420.94 0.001 56.9 0.00 0.0 65.77 0. 543.6 19 "7.29 0.001 9.3 000 0.0 53.37 0.00 509. 20 M7.22 0.001 19.35 0.00 0.0 76.68 0.00 433.2 21 90.25 0.00 6.6 0.00 0.0 22.86 OOH 1197 22 168.04 0.00 8.72 0.00 0.0 2122 9.01 207. 23 0.00 0,00 42.0 U.86 0.0 14931 0.01 119.8 24 109.65 000 61.6 U57 89.49 44.4 0.00 382.7 25 520.62 48.55 2871 4.35 0.0 142.79 4.2 7492 26 645.89 ON 1 o.od 0 87.43 4.6 739.7 27 0.00 0.0 0. 0.00 0. 15.31 0.0 15.31 28 0.00 ON 0. 17.71 231, 15.16 0.00 264.31 29 767N 29.05 33.35 0.00 0.2 65.64 7.85 903. 30 246.820.35 0. 0. 13.31 0.0 280.5 31 1 1130 29.7 6272 1512 0.0 19841 0.0 419.0 Total 51841.8 207.8 541.8 180. 341.21 1,17&09170.88 8,359. Source: Department of Planning B Development 3.2 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan The percentage of ultimate development actually developed within each NPD is summarized on Table 3.3. Source: Department of Planning 8 Development 3.3 Table 3.3. 2002 Percent Developed Acreage ND LDR84DR HDR Comnlerci Retail Office Industrial Public/ Quasi Public GreeMeMt Total 1 No Na 0. O.W% Na Na 0. O.On 2 Na Na 0 0.00% No Na Na 0. 3 Na No 0 0.00% No 100.00% Na 29.64 4 Na Na Na No No We 0.00% 0.00 5 Na No Na 0.00% No No No 6 14.21 No 0.00% 0.00% No 1.53% 0.00% 7 100.00 100. 100.00% Na No 10000% No 8 79.58% Na 0.00% No No 7].99 No 9 10.10% 0. 0.00% 0 Na /.71 1.80% 10 No Na 0.00% 0. No 0.00 0.00% d43.39 11 Na No96.49% 0.00% Na 100.00% We 12 0.00% N 0.00% Na Na fi5.49 Na 13 100.00% 0. 0.21% 100.00% 9.83 100 0.00% 14 49.51 0,001% 2.85% 100.00% NB 3312 100. 15 86.1 N 000 We No 100.00% 10000% 85.59 16 100. 73. ]231 0.00% No 100.00% Na 61]7 17 No N40. 0.00% No 912]% No 2996 18 100.00% N5724 No No 100.00% Na 92.74° 19 75.67% No 29.15%1 Na I Na 1 34.66% No 65.63 20 49.18% 0. 43.42% No No 92.39% No 52.29 21 59.87 Na 100.00% O.W% No 86.87% Na 63.33 22 66.50% No 24.06% 0. No 100.00% 100.00% 60.79 23 Na No 71.90% 9194% No Na 0.00% 80.40 24 100.00% 0.013% 100.00% 9632% 100.0096 100.00% NoM92,75 25 9388 100.00% 63.35 36.05% Na 100.00% 93.326 87.73 Ne 528 Na Na 100.00% 100027 0. NB No 0.00% No No 0028 No Ne No 100.00% 80.98% Ne No29 9975 100.00 87. 0.00% 100.00% 100.00 100.30 ]8.20 Na 73.]8 Na Na25.38 Na31 81.28% 100.00 60.23% 32.11% Na 6888%NaTotal ]0.12% ST.J1Y.28.]9 7.3 69.73 71.52% J Source: Department of Planning 8 Development 3.3 m V Q a m n 0 v v m c y X W N M n m 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Estimates of future land use form the basis of infrastructure planning. The forecast of future land use was predicated on the following assumptions: a. General i. Developed property and property in advanced stages of development planning should correspond to land use classifications and zoning under which the development is authorized. ii. Undeveloped property without current development plans should be classified in accordance with the highest and best use based on the best information available. In some cases, the current zoning appears improper. The Future Land Uses identified in the Comprehensive Plan were the basis of forecast where property remains undeveloped. For example, areas north of Ridgeview Drive should be considered only as non-residential. Tracts surrounding arterial hubs may be identified as 'Commercial/Retail" rather than'Office.' iii. The FEMA 100 -year floodplain was utilized to establish developable acreage. In the future, it would be preferable to establish the fully urbanized floodplain for this purpose. iv. The categories of future land use generally follow those utilized in the Capital Improvement Plan Impact Fee Study. v. PartdGreenbeft includes both public and private open space as well as parks and floodplain areas. b. Multi -family Development I. Property zoned MF12 was assumed to develop at the rate of 12 dwelling units/developable acre. ii. Property zoned MF18 was assumed to develop at the rate of 16.5 dwelling unks/developable acre. c. Single-family Residential I. Lots with building permits issued are assumed to be developed. ii. Subdivisions with filed final plats will develop at 80% of the June 2001 rate for as long as undeveloped lots remain. Lot takedown may extend beyond the ten-year planning period. Hi. Subdivisions with approved preliminary plats will develop at the same rate as those phases for which a final plat has been fled. iv. Preliminary plats are the basis for lot counts where no final plat has been filed. Several of these projects are of significant size: Waterford, Lost Creek and parts of Twin Creeks. v. Developers with more than one subdivision will develop at an equivalent rate in all similar subdivisions. vi. Unzoned areas identified for Low Density Residential development west of US 75 will develop at a standard R-5 density of 3.2 dwelling units/acre. East of US 75, additional residential development will be at a rate of 3.51 dwelling unfts/acre. vii. Subdivisions designed for the high end of the market will develop at a more measured rate than mid -market products. viii. Property currently developed has been reconciled with the records of Building and Code Compliance. 3.5 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan d. Non -Residential Development It is almost impossible to predict non-residential takedown by tract. The maximum non-residential takedown in a single year was 245 acres in 2000. To date, within this fiscal period, the takedown for this type of development is 83 acres. A conservative estimate is between 100 and 150 acres annually. The residential density of any individual tract will be established by the zoning on the tract. Based on the forecasted and actual land uses, the average net density of residential population in each NPD has been calculated based on net residential acreage (including high density residential), and does not include Flood plain or park acreage, thereby overstating actual density. Table 3.4 - Ultimate Development -Net Developable Acres 2001 NPD LDRI5IDR HDR Net Residential Unarn mial Density Retail OI6os Industrial Publid Quasi Pudic Greenbelt Total Groes Acreage 1 0 0 00 94.64 303.02 0 0 441 402.07 450 4 2 0 00 171,31 111.85 0 0 0 283.15 325.] 3 0 00 64.14 823 6189 0 208.82 208. 4 0 00 a 1M.M a 17.37 161.42 201. 5 0 00 0 357.12 0 130 0 358.4 3M.4- 6 77328 28 20.29 6.89 0 10592 52.30 958.66 1,237.] 7 1 428.571 31.01 3. 18.341 0 0 41.40 0 519.34 537.301 8 26969 1 3 32.30 01 U.511 354M 354. 9 439.61 112 2. 5.67 MOM 73.79 35.0 712.27 746.4 10 0 0. 182 26 430.84 7.94 48 625.92 680. 11 0 0. 81.66 97.39 6923 24828 248.2 12 138.41 35.8 8. 237.61 0 0 23.33 435.24 497.5 13 134.18 MY 4. 266.05 7.31 103.8 22.13 2.3] 571.60 605. 14 313.57 9.81 2. 52.20 5.75 2101 8.9 411.18 401.5 15 765.54 2.5, 1230 0 10.69 35.50 824.07 821.0 16 210.92 94. 6.6 51.91 176.89 31. 0 566,38 602.8 17 a 131. 115.61 33.7 280.71 280.71 18 420.90 3.2 99. 0 65. 5852 610. 19 591.14 3 318 0 153.97 ]]] M. 20 685.68 15. 41 44. 0 0 83.00 828.50 958.3 21 150.75 2. 6.8 5.34 0 26.38 0 189.12 189.1 22 252.] 13.d 3. 38.23 7. 0 21,22 9.08 340.60 369.7 23 0.0 58.5 68. 0 14.93 7.26 149.10 159. 24 109. 8.3 1.6 61. 70.1 99.4 44.44 0 393 74 403.7 25 554.54 48.5 5.3 0.5.31 12. 142.79 4. 807.8 876. 26 736 21 3. 34. 0 87.43 4 862 863.21 27 132 3 0 210.90 15.31 11. 369. 587. 28 0. 0 1771 285.7 15.18 318. 375.1 29 769. 29. 4. 49.71 25.7 0.2 65. 7.8 947. 1,018.7 30 315.78 3. 27.5 0 52.44 395.81 4283 31 139.06 29] 6. 104.1 47.09 0 297.63 617. 680.1 Tobi All 6,3J1.66 362.7 3.7 2,022.2 2,451.13 488.36 1,643.09 205. 15,608.1 18,858. %TO - 53.7% 2.3 13.0 158% 3.2% 10.6% Source: Department of Planning 8 Development While the city has experienced unprecedented growth in all sectors, residential development is expected to be almost complete within the next five years. In 2002, only five large tracts of land remain 3.7 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan undeveloped within the corporate boundaries. Land use within these tracts is expected to follow the proposed future land uses of previous Comprehensive Plans. Future Land Use is shown on Map 3.3. and summarized on Table 3.4. It should be noted that the Future Land Use Map does not constitute zoning regulations nor establish zoning district boundaries. Land use planning has followed traditional planning theory in establishing single-family residential uses as the most protected category, buffered by increasing intense uses of townhome, multi -family and garden office. Specific provisions in the Allen Land Development Code require additional distance separation and screening between residential and non-residential uses. Commercial activity is limited to areas along major transportation arterials, and concentrated at major intersections. Significant changes in the zoning in transitional areas should be accompanied by an amendment to the Future Land Use Plan. As an example, the City has determined that residential development north of Stacy Road should be permitted only if accompanied by the development of a golf course. In the event that this area is rezoned for residential uses, the future land uses in the surrounding areas should be re- evaluated and the Future Land Use Plan amended accordingly. Priorities and Implementation Strategies Priority: Development of well-planned, stable residential neighborhoods throughout the city. Implementation Strategies: i. Protect residential development from more intense, intrusive land uses, with higher densities located closest to major arterials or commercial centers. ii. Residential development should continue to be predicated on the neighborhood concept. A residential neighborhood should be bounded by major arterial streets, and may consist of a number of properties or subdivisions. Retail, commercial, or office development should be limited to the intersections of the major streets as necessary to serve the needs of the neighborhood. Multifamily units, retirement housing, or housing for the elderly should be located in close proximity to the commercial areas where services and facilities are conveniently available. iii. Elementary school and park facilities should be centrally located to the neighborhood, with residential uses designed around the facilities. Elementary schools should not be located adjacent to major thoroughfares. Middle schools should be located in areas where traffic and school activities do not intrude substantially on the residential neighborhood and should require access to one or more collector streets. Secondary Schools and most institutional uses considered public or semipublic, such as churches, should be located along the major thoroughfares, with secondary access to collectors. iv. Residential uses should be buffered from unnecessary traffic congestion and cut -through traffic should be minimized by design. v. Maintain and strengthen partnerships with homeowner associations to effect code compliance. vi. Where deficient, bring residential subdivision infrastructure up to present city standards as funding may allow. Residential infrastructure includes alleys, street lighting, sidewalks, drainage, streets, and utilities. Separate plans articulate these proposals in greater detail. e.g. Water Master Plan, Wastewater Master Plan, etc. vii. Maintain Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) review of neighborhood design to improve security. viii. Residential subdivisions should be adequately connected to adjacent neighborhoods by transportation and pedestrian ways to reinforce the larger community. ix. Multi -family density should not exceed 18 units/developable acre and 350 units per individual development. There should be no more than two complexes in a district, with individual complexes separated from one another by other land uses or natural or man-made features. BE 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Priority: Encourage environmentally sensitive non-residential development within designated areas. Implementation Strategies: i. Concentrate local retail commercial in nodes rather than allowing strip development. it. Prohibit residential development within 1,200 feet of SH 121 and north of Ridgeview Drive. iii. Encourage the development of high intensity non-residential uses along SH 121 and US 75. iv. Encourage redevelopment of the Central Business District, allowing for mixed use development where designated. v. Maintain standards for non-residential uses in the development of all city projects. Priority: Preserve floodplain areas in their natural state, utilizing these areas as greenbelts and trail corridors. Implementation Strategies: i. Provide public access to greenbelts adjacent to neighborhoods by requiring single -loaded streets adjacent to floodplain, trail easements, alternate means of access or a combination of these. ii. Continue to require the dedication of Floodplain areas (fully urbanized flow) to the City of Allen. iii. Institute erosion control regulations and require reforestation for public and private projects. 3.9 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Categories and Zoning. Table 3.5 shows the general correlation between proposed future land uses and zoning districts. It should be noted that the Comprehensive Plan does not constitute zoning regulations or establish zoning district boundaries. The City's zoning ordinance is cumulative which allows less intense development in zoning districts which would permit much more intense uses, such as office uses in Commercial Corridor zoning districts. The Future Land Use Map depicts preferred uses rather than maximum allowed within individual zoning districts. TABLE 3.5. RELATIONSHIP OF ZONING DISTRICTS TO LAND USE PIAN CATEGORIES land Uel Zoning Districi Max Density Min. Lot Size Min. Dwelling In Category (DWAae) in Sq. Fast Sq. Feet VLDR AaAgdculturelOpen Spars N/A WA R-1 Single Family Residential Estate 1.0 40,000 2,400 R-1.5 Single Family Residential Estate 1.5 30,000 2,400 R-2 Single Family Residential Estate 21 18,000 2000 LDR R-3 Single Family Residential 30 12,000 1,800 R4 Single Family Residential 3.6 9,000 1,400 R-5 Single Family Residential 4.6 7,500 1,200 MDR R-6 Single Family Residential 5.2 6,000 1,200 R-7 Single Family Residential 02 5,000 1,000 2F -Duplex 9.6 8.000 1,000 TH- Townhouse 10.8 DU/A 10.8 3,300 1,000 HDR MF -12 Muldfamily 12 12,000 500 MF -18 Multifamily 18 14,000 500 Com/Ratell Local Retail, Light Commercial, Shopping Center, General Business, Condor Commercial CF Community Facility Office Office, Garden Once OfficaBT Once, Garden Once, industrial Technology Industrial Light Industrial, Industrial Technology Greenbelt Any Mixed Use CBD, PD �VLDR - Very Low Density Residential. Estate residential and neighborhoods on large lots that average no more than hyo units per we LDR - Lav Derain, ResidentialTraditional mix of single-family homes hating densities of 21 to 5.0 units per acre. MDR - Medium Density Residential Single-family residential includes duplexes, townhouses, duster homes, patio homes and garden homes with densities ranging from K2 to 11.9 units per acre HDR- Hioh Density Residential Apartment/condominium residential development with densities ranging from 121018 units per acre. SJR - CommenciaMeta1l: Retail, office and business technology uses concentrated along freeways and arterial roatlaays. 0 - 0111c : Office development allowing retail uses incidental to once development I - Ind trio l 41) Gen..Ilv light itl stri hxaxddisftibution andb technology 'thaut outside Wrens. Mixed Use: Mixed-use area of offices, recall, sendces, medium to high density residences and public buildings. Development should Include Pedestrian circulation and amenities to meet the requirements of Me individual development CF-Canmun8v Facilities Public and private parks and institutional uses including schools, churches, hospitals, mnvalescant and enlisted living centers and government facilities, including buildings. G.Gmnbel! Floodplain and marginal land adjacent tc the fully urbanized floodplain, usually dedicated to Me city, where development is generally limited to Units or parking. 3.10 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan 3.1 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT Central Business District Land uses in the CBD include scattered residential, small commercial and a significant amount of institutional development including the Municipal Complex, the U.S. Postal Service, the City Cemetery and several churches. Approximately 40% of the land within the CBD is vacant and an additional 20% is seriously underutilized, in part because of inadequate infrastructure, less costly undeveloped land elsewhere, the incompatibility of some existing land uses, and poor traffic circulation patterns. A lack of readily available parking and the lack of coherent design and development requirements exacerbate the challenges of meaningful redevelopment of the Allen CBD. The CBD Redevelopment Plan adopted in December 2000 is realistic in its implementation schedule but will require a long -tens commitment of both public and private resources. Continued compromise and cooperation between all partners, and the continuous re-evaluation and refining of strategies will be necessary. PURPOSE The CBD purposes identified through the community workshops articulate the desire that the CBD be established as a focus for community activities. They include: A Point of Identity Urban Residential Uses Parades and Civic Activities A Worship Center A Gateway to Allen Station Park Dining Destination A Pedestrian Experience An Area for Senior Citizens A Reason to Go to the Area A Government Center A Cultural Center Trailhead to City Hike and Bike Trails Historic Preservation Specialty and Boutique Shopping A Downtown Park An Area Supportive of the Small Business Environment Unlike large urban centers established as financial hubs or catering to strictly commercial or entertainment interests, the purposes identified dictate redevelopment at a more human scale, where the interests of the residents in passive parks, leisure dining and social, religious and civic interests converge, and commercial activities support rather than dominate. Existing land Use Existing land uses are documented on Map 3.1.1. They reflect the transitional character of a large portion of the CBD, with significant amounts of undeveloped or underdeveloped land, and adjacent incompatible uses. The quality of the street and pedestrian system linking these uses ranges from excellent to non- existent. The railroad right -0f -way owned by the Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) divides the CBD. Parts of Ash Street north of Main Street and Austin Street are located on property owned by DART. 3.1.1 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Map 3.1.1 Existing Land Use Single-family residential uses have declined in number, and the quality of housing has deteriorated as a result of expansion of the regional roadway system (U.S. 75 and McDermott Drive) and policies forbidding new single-family residential development. Nevertheless, the condition of most residential properties ranges from fair to good. New commercial development is generally limited to low-density single -story retail and office located on small tracts. The majority of this development is concentrated along Allen Drive north of Main Street and includes professional offices and medical supply and service. During the boom years of the early to mid 1980's, there was considerable redevelopment within the CBD. This came to an abrupt halt with the recession of the late 1980's. Beginning in the early 1990'x, construction of office development was seen along McDermott Drive. The condition of most commercial development ranges from fair to good. Institutional uses include the Municipal Complex, the U.S. Post Office, the Health 8 Human Services Building, the former offices of the Building & Code Compliance Department of the City of Allen, the Senior Citizens Center operated by the City of Allen, the First Christian Church, First Baptist Church, St. Mary Baptist Church, Moore's Memorial Sanctuary located at St. Mary and Cedar, and the Inheritance Assembly of God Church located on Cedar between Main Street and McDermott Drive. The number of churches located in the CBD has declined from nine to five in recent years. Institutional uses also include soccer fields located south of Cottonwood Creek on St. Mary Drive. Parking is an issue for commercial and institutional uses on Main Street between the railroad tracks and Allen Drive. Off-street parking has generally been provided in all commercial development since the CBD was established in 1983. 3.1.2 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Traffic Circulation Improving the street system in the CBD plays a significant role in the downtown revitalization process. Currently, McDermott Drive is the only access road for people from the east and the west sides of the City going to the CBD. Although Cedar Drive connects the CBD area north to Exchange Parkway, the capacity of Cedar Drive is limited because of the sharp curves. Because Cottonwood Creek fortes a natural barrier between Greenville Avenue (SH 5) and the CBD area, there is presently no connection between the CBD and Greenville Avenue north of McDermott Drive, and because US 75 also represents significant impediments to access, there are currently only two access points between the CBD and the areas west of US 75, i.e. the McDermott Drive underpass and the Allen Drive overpass at US 75. The intersections on McDermott Drive between US 75 and SH 5, both signalized and unsignalized, are presently operating at a Level of Service (LOS) D and E during peak periods. Additional development in the CBD area is expected to reduce service at these intersections to an unacceptable level. An alternate route that diverts a portion of the traffic from McDermott Drive should be established. Property west of SH 5 and east of Cottonwood Creek is only partially developed, but does not permit the extension of a roadway from the CBD to SH 5 south of the Cottonwood Creek apartment complex, leaving the east extension of St. Mary Drive as the only possible alternative to connect the CBD and SH 5. The extension of St. Mary Drive west to Allen Drive will improve the alignment on Allen Drive by eliminating the reverse curve on Allen Drive. The driveway from the Allen Medical Building should be reconfigured to connect to the proposed extension of St. Mary Drive. The development of any light rail line system is likely to require an elevated section over Cottonwood Creek, facilitating the construction of easttwest connections at St. Mary Drive and Coats Drive. (See Map 3.1.2. for Street Classification Systems. See also Map 4.1. inset for CBD Thoroughfares.) Standards for the CBD Collectors In certain areas of the CBD, the acquisition of additional right-of-way, may be both difficult and undesirable. As a result, it is recommended that the standard established for the CBD be a fifty foot (50'- 3 1.3 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan 0") right-of-way with a variable pavement section. The width of the paving section should depend on on - street parking and the need for wider sidewalks. It is recognized that additional ROW may be required for Intersection improvements. Proposed Street Extensions The classification of streets in the CBD is illustrated on Map 3.1.2. The classification system detemrines both the requirement for right-of-way and the paving width. While the CBD was originally laid out as a grid, the presence of the railroad and interurban railway resulted in many streets remaining either unimproved or actually being discontinuous. A summary of street extensions follows. 1. Allen Drive north of MCDemrott should be improved from Main Street to U.S. Highway 75 as a primary CBD axis. Pedestrian connections should also be strongly emphasized in this corridor. The curve in Allen Drive should be eliminated and replaced with a traffic circle or'roundabout'. 2. Bonham should be improved from Belmont to Boyd with a transition from commercial to local residential status between Boyd and Coats. 3. Ash Street should be developed as a modified collector to an intersection with the proposed west extension of St. Mary Drive to Allen Drive. A "Modified Collector' requires a wider paving section (37 feet) in a constrained right-of-way. 4. St. Mary Drive should be extended west to Allen Drive and east across Cottonwood Creek to S.H. 5. The entrance to the Eric Vita Medical Building should be reconfigured. This extension should be considered either in conjunction with a commitment to DART or a regional light rail system, which would permit a grade separation as the rail line bridges Cottonwood Creek, or as an at -grade crossing which would permit earlier development in conjunction with the development of the Library/Auditorium. Should it be necessary to eliminate another at -grade crossing, it is recommended that the crossing on Belmont Drive be eliminated. Belmont is located between McDermott Drive and Main Street, which will provide adequate access. 5. Coats Drive should be extended across the railroad right-of-way. Coats is presently constructed as of a 45 -toot section with concrete curb and gutter between Ash Drive and Cedar Drive. Expansion of the paving section to 37 feet should be considered in conjunction with redevelopment. 6. Dogwood should be improved to boulevard status from Main Street to Coats. In the vicinity of Cottonwood Creek, Dogwood will provide infrastructure and access to property proposed for development as urban high-density mixed use residential as well as access to the proposed "Historic Village." Construction of a traffic circle or "roundabout" at the intersection of Coats and Dogwood would provide an aesthetic terminus for high density residential property. This project should be undertaken in partnership with private sector development of the mixed-use residential property. Intersection Improvements 1. The First Christian Church located on the northwest comer of Allen Drive and Main Street was constructed seven feet inside the public rightof-way, making the necessary improvement of the intersection more difficult. 2. The irregular intersection of Bonham at Belmont should be corrected. 3. The intersection of St. Mary Drive and Allen Drive should be designed in conjunction with the extension of St. Mary. Alley Improvements Belmont should be downgraded to a service alley from U.S. 75 to Bonham, but should be improved as an alley from Bonham to Anna Street to provide access to parking within Design District No. 2. Other unimproved alleys should be improved to provide access to parking at the rear of commercial structures. 3.1.4 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Parking Generally, small tracts within the CBD are insufficient in size to provide adequate on-site parking. As a result, small parking areas should be scattered throughout the CBD, ideally within 400 feet of retail and commercial development. Off-street parking should be located to the rear of all structures and should be screened from view. Along Main Street within Design District No. 1 the following alternatives should be considered: 1. A public off-street lot on City property should be considered behind the former Central Fire Station; 2. Driveway entrances onto Main Street between Allen Drive and Austin Street should be eliminated to increase parallel parking and/or on -street angle parking within the present right-of-way. Angle parking should be considered within the center of the street between Allen Butler, although this would require reducing the number of travel lanes; Drive and 3. A portion of the Transportation Corridor should be developed for parking, including Austin Street. 4. Shared parking should be required as a part of public projects, including the Library/Auditorium and a DART or other transit station; and shared parking agreements with institutional uses such as First Baptist Church should be encouraged. Pedestrian and Bicycle Linkages Sidewalk Solutions Sidewalks should be constructed along all streets in conjunction with roadway construction or reconstruction. In order to encourage pedestrian activity, it is essential that sidewalks be wider than those found in residential neighborhoods, but that adequate provision also be made for planting trees and landscaping. Structures should be set back only as far as required to provide for adequate sidewalks and should generally be built to that line, except in Design District No. 2, where a 20 -foot front yard setback and rear and side yard setbacks should be maintained to preserve the character of the original town. Sidewalks in Design District 2 should be five feet in width and located five feet from the curb within the street right-of-way. Sidewalks along Allen Drive and Cedar Drive should be a minimum of 12 feet in width with a five-foot parkway strip. All other sidewalks should be a minimum of eight feet in width with a five- foot parkway strip. All structures should be set back even with or behind the sidewalk. Map 3.1.3. illustrates the approved sidewalk widths. 315 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Map 3.1.3. CBD Sidewalks Sidewalk design should be uniform on both sides of any street. In Design District No. 1, no curb cuts should be permitted on Main Street to improve pedestrian circulation. Access to parking should be from side and rear alleys only. Trails and linkages Trails within the floodplain are an integral part of the pedestrian system in the CBD and should be extended to connect with other regional and local systems. They also form part of the bicycle access and should be incorporated as a requirement of new development. TRANSIT While the necessity for transit appears remote to many individuals Irving in Allen today, increased pressure on regional arterials and deteriorating air quality can be expected to make convenient transit access increasingly desirable. The existence of a transportation corridor linked to a regional system (DART) would provide a significant boost to transit -oriented development, and the CBD is the desirable location for a station within Allen. The options for a fixed guide -way transit system include light and commuter rail. Light rail is generally more environmentally acceptable, but would require replacement of the existing heavy rails, while commuter rail in theory could be adjusted to meet the requirements of existing trackage. The choice of systems has various implications that extend beyond the scope of this study, including the means of locomotion, train length, timetables, access, connectivity with other systems and modes of transportation, the feasibility of grade separating key intersections and reconstruction of rail across Cottonwood Creek. 3.1.6 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Ideally, the system would not require grade separation, minimizing the visual impact on the CBD and surrounding areas while providing easy access for commuters and visitors to the community, although an elevated section could provide additional opportunities for surface parking. The ideal location for a station would be north of Main Street, situated in such away that the requirements for dedicated parking could be met through parking shared with the Library/Auditorium. The station site could also provide an important trail head within the CBD to encourage the use of bicycles as an alternative means of transportation. WATER AND WASTEWATER Infrastructure should be designed to meet the requirements of planned land use for potable water supply, water for fire protection and for wastewater collection. In some areas, old water supply and wastewater collection systems should be replaced to avoid the problems that are to be anticipated as the system continues to age. Utility improvements should be undertaken in conjunction with street construction or re- construction where possible as shown in Map 3.1.4. Recommended Infrastructure Improvements. Map 3.1.4. Recommended Infrastructure Improvements ga El �nIN f �I Recommended improvements are summarized as follows: EXISTING STREETS Proposed Improvements Street Segment Street Sidewalks Water Wastewater R -O -W Needed Allen 2 Main to Ola 37' 6(west) 8' 6' Yes - 60' Anna 2 Fire Station to Coats 31' S. 6" Ash McDermott to End 37' 8' 8" 6" Yes -60' Astor Main to Dogwood 31' 4' 8" Yes - 50 Belmont 1 US 75 to Bonham 20' 8" 6" Bonham 2 Belmont to Boyd 37' 8' 8" 6" Yes - 60' Bonham 3 Boyd to Costs 31' S' 6" Boyd US 75 to Austin 37' 8' 8" 6" Butler 2 Boyd to Coats 37' 8' Coats 1 Allen to Butler 37' 8' 6" Coats 2 Ash to Cedar 8' Coats 3 Cedar to End 37' 8' 8" 8" Fortis McDermott to Belmont 8" 6" Main 1 US 75 to Allen 37' 8' 8" 6" Yes - 60 St. Mary 1 Cedar to End 37' 8' 8" Yes - 60' 3.1.7 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan NEW STREETS - Proposed Improvements Street Segment Street Sidewalks Water Wastewater R -O -W Needed Belmont 3 Bonham to Anna 20' 5' 8" Costs Butler to Ash 37' 8' 8" 6- Yes -60' Coats 5 Ash to Cedar 3T 8' Dogwood Main to Coats 2-25' 8' W SL Mary2 Allen to Cedar 3T 8' B.. Yes -60' SL Mary 3 End to Bridge 3T 8' B.. Storm drainage will be incorporated into the design of streets as rural cross-sections are replaced with curb and gutter. The natural channel of the tributary to Cottonwood Creek along the northern boundary of the CBD just west of Cedar Drive and east of the railroad right-of-way was filled and an artificial channel constructed. A flood study should be conducted to evaluate the effects of this construction in conjunction with the possible replacement of the culvert under the railroad tracks which appears to impede upstream flood flaws. The results of the study should be forwarded to the Federal Emergency Management Agency with the application for a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR). In 2000, the City adopted additional zoning regulations in the CBD (See Map 3.1.5.): L� Central Business District '-"'- SubdistrictZontae f `d I rc V - o� n wr in.n0. a.nc. u.ntu uour "SAL .k . �i Map 3.1.5. Central Business District Zoning Subdistricts 31.8 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Conceptually, these zoning subdistricts will permit more mixed use development, development supported by infrastructure and transportation improvements. Zoning classifications are summarized as follows: Mixed use Residential/Retail: High density residential with first floor retail and service uses should be established adjacent to Cottonwood Creek with direct access to transportation and recreation systems. Parking should be screened from the street or structured. Shared parking should be encouraged. Office: Office uses should be located along transportation arterials including McDermott Drive and U.S. 75. Office uses adjacent to existing residential development should be required to provide setbacks from residential uses. Office/Retail: A combination of office and retail uses should be encouraged at the center of the CBD. Retail uses will be supported by the proximity (within walking distance) of office uses. Retail: Retail uses should be located at the center of the CBD with adequate free parking and pedestrian amenities. Retail uses to be encouraged are specialty uses Institutional: Institutional uses, including the Municipal Complex, Postal Service and religious institutions support retail uses and should be designed to reinforce redevelopment of the CBD through the investment in infrastructure and transportation linkages. Institutional/Office: A combination of institutional and office uses establishes a requirement sensitive to the design requirements of both. Medical Office & Supply/Service: Low intensity medical offices and sales/service uses associated with medical practice permits development adjacent to single-family residential subdivisions that does not infringe on traditional uses within those subdivisions. Transportation Corridor: The transportation corridor permits only uses which support transportation and transit uses, including parking and fixed guideway transit and trail systems. Design Districts: Design Districts have been established to regulate the design requirements associated with areas of particular historic or other sensitivity to establish a context for existing structures or to establish requirements for in -fill or new development. (See Map 3.1.6.) An area east of Cedar Drive south of St. Mary Drive has been set aside for the relocation of historic structures on property committed to the preservation and maintenance of the structure. The development plan for the "Historic Village' is included in Section 8. Urban design. The historic structures should be adequately buffered from existing athletic field uses. Relocation of historic bridge structures to provide access across Cottonwood Creek or within the confines of the park should be considered. High activity lighted park uses (soccer fields) adjacent to St. Mary Drive should be relocated in the future to areas closer to suburban residential development with adequate parking and replaced with more passive uses sensitive to adjacent Historic Village and high density residential development. Non -conforming uses will continue to exist for as long as the use continues uninterrupted. Loss of legal non- conforming status will require the use to conform to adopted regulations. A neighborhood park should be established on the southwest comer of McDermott Drive and Cedar. 3.1.9 Map 3.1.6. — Design Overlay Districts 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Priorities and Implementation Strategies Priority:. Provide for sympathetic redevelopment in the Central Business District (CBD) for low to medium density uses, including office, retail, restaurants, service and employment uses, and high density residential uses. Implementation Strategies: i. Improve vehicular circulation patterns in the CBD to support the redevelopment. ii. Encourage the incorporation of street level facade treatments to entice pedestrian interest. iii. Encourage outdoor dining and seating facilities where appropriate. iv. Existing residential subdivisions adjoining the CBD should be buffered from the unwarranted impacts of redevelopment. V. A viable transportation corridor should be maintained along the DART right-of-way to preserve the City's options for fixed guide -way transit. vi. Upgrade infrastructure to allow highest and best land use. vii. Institutional uses should be designed to act as catalysts for redevelopment. viii. A sympathetic context should be established for histodc properties. 3.1.10 2002.2022 Comprehensive Plan 4. TRANSPORTATION Allen's Relationship to the Regional Transportation System. Allen is located on US 75 (Central Expressway) between Plano and McKinney. State Highway 121 has been identified as a future expressway corridor linking Allen with the Dallas/Ft. Worth Airport and the McKinney Airport. Existing Conditions - Roadways The City's thoroughfare system has evolved from a loosely defined network of State highways, Farm to Market (FM) roads and County roads maintained by Collin County. The majority of these roads were two- lane asphalt or gravel lanes built along section and property lines with sharp ninety -degree curves. Following urbanization, the number of roads in Allen meeting this description continues to decline. In 1985, the City adopted a Thoroughfare Plan consisting only of major arterial streets based on the 1984 North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) transportation model and the Collin County Thoroughfare Plan. Under the 1985 plan, major roadways were classified as major and minor arterial roadways. Major (6 -LD) east to west arterial roadways consisted of Chaparral Road, Hedgcoxe Road, Bethany Drive, McDermott Dnve/Main Street, Exchange Parkway/Rowlett Road, Stacy Road and Ridgeview Drive. Major north to south roadways consisted of FM 2551/Angel Parkway, Allen Heights Drive, Jupiter Road, SH 5, US 75, Watters Road, Alma Drive and Custer Road. In the 1992 Plan, minor revisions to the thoroughfare system included the extension of FM 2551 as a six - lane divided road to Stacy Road, and the inclusion of Malone Road as a two-lane undivided thoroughfare (between Chaparral Road and Main Street). Minor realignments were also proposed on various streets north of Stacy Road including the interchanges with SH 121. Finally, the extension of Rowlett Road, west of Alma Drive was deleted. In 1998, the Plan showed a system of collectors for the first time. The purpose of a secondary or collector system is to distribute traffic from local residential streets to the major arterial system. Secondary roadways or collectors are designed to provide access to major and minor thoroughfares and to limit cul -through traffic movements. The secondary system or collector should serve as an access route to schools, local parks/playgrounds and community services. These roadways should be designed to reduce traffic speeds through residential areas. The precise alignment and classification of proposed collectors will be determined based on adjacent land uses and traffic demand. The Thoroughfare Plan shown on Map 4.1. establishes an efficient roadway system designed to limit traffic congestion, and to provide adequate access and circulation within the community at full development. The roadway classification system follows the hierarchical tautology established by the Texas Department of Transportation and the NCTCOG, providing connectivity to adjacent communities. It also provides for a secondary collector system that distributes traffic onto major and regional arterial roadways. While signifcant progress in the implementation of the Thoroughfare Plan has occurred since 1998, it is anticipated that additional work will be completed during the 2002-2022 planning period, based on State and community priorities and the availability of resources. The Thoroughfare Design Standards shown on Tables 4.1. and 4.2. govern design of roadways in the City of Allen. 4.1 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan My any depending upon field Situation At LauN d Service E Design Level d Service should as C. A Parnal ndoded median apening may nd approved by Me City EWMe a, Provided Me distance Eetrveen Me fianded opening and any adjacent opening b M least 400leet s Apprwel d individual median aaeniios is subject 0 sale geomeMFJaMHt mid billy aanditipns as detemaned W was City EW,neer P-Pnndpel Medal M-MincrAMnal D-DieMad U -Undivided C -Coy Yer R-Reecasial r-Rurd, 4.3 Ta01e 4.1. TItO14WGHFARE DESIGN 6TANOMDB SIGN ELEMENTS PBD RD MBD M4D MRl C4U C2U R2U All ROSS SECTION SHEET 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 A NUMBER OF LANES e a 6 4 4 4 2 2 2 S LANE WIDTH F 12 12 12 12 12 11 18 15 12 C RIGHT-OF-WAYWIDTH- MIDBLOCK 120 150 120 90 70 70 00 60 70 C RIGHT-OF-WAYWIDTH - INTERSECTION (PT) 140 184 140 11D BD S0 72 NA NA 'Oli HOURLY SERVICE VOLUME PER LANE 800 725 700 700 625 550 500 NA NA PER FACILITY 4.800 5,800 1 4.200 2,000 2,500 1 2.200 1 a25 NA NA DAILY SERVICE VOLUME 46,000 551500 40,200 25,800 24,000 21,000 7900 800 600 E DESIGN SPEED MPH 4530 4550 40-60 4045 3540 3540 3035 25-W 20-30 F MAKIMUM GRADE % 1-5 58 5-6 53 57 SB 50 88 eb G MINIMUM HORIZONTAL CURVATURE CENTERLINE RADIUS 1,400 1,050 1,050 1,050 850 050 600 NA NA H STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE 475 475 475 400 325 325 200 200 200 MINIMUM MEDMN WIDTH 27 17 17 17 NA NA NA NA NA J) MIN. MEDIAN OPEN SPACE(FTY1 900 900 660 330 NA NA NA NA NA K)VERTICALCLEARANCE 17 17 P 16 18 16 16 10 10 LIMINIMUM DRIVEWAY SPACING F 330 330 250 220 220 100 44 H M M) MINIMUM VERTICAL CURVE (FT) 1,H0 1,440 1,440 1,H0 %0 800 BW NA NA My any depending upon field Situation At LauN d Service E Design Level d Service should as C. A Parnal ndoded median apening may nd approved by Me City EWMe a, Provided Me distance Eetrveen Me fianded opening and any adjacent opening b M least 400leet s Apprwel d individual median aaeniios is subject 0 sale geomeMFJaMHt mid billy aanditipns as detemaned W was City EW,neer P-Pnndpel Medal M-MincrAMnal D-DieMad U -Undivided C -Coy Yer R-Reecasial r-Rurd, 4.3 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan 6 I (NxA G (NxA) F 1 PKWY N4ANP5 eauxEs PKWY. I- IHIHI 1� F - Traffic Model Overview. The North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) completed the first traffic model for Allen in 1984. This model was used for the 1985 Comprehensive Plan and its update in 1992. In 1998, the City implemented a computer-based transportation model (TranPlan) which developed base line (year 2000) and forecast scenario for the year 2020. The model assesses land use changes and determines the effect of development on the existing and proposed thoroughfare system. The model applies regional demographic characteristics and roadway information to projected land uses within the City in order to estimate traffic volumes on individual segments. Traffic survey zones (TSZ) incorporated in the model correspond closely with the city's Neighborhood Planning Districts (NPDs) . Future Roadways. The Thoroughfare Plan (Map 4.1) shows the future expansion of the roadway system detailed on Table 4.3. during the next ten (10) years, based on the 2002 Impact Fee Study. This table also evaluates the 2002 Level of Service (LOS) on individual segments. Priority should be given to improving roadways with 4.4 Table 4.2.Th2m Mare Dxi nSWrd!Wa N A L B C D E F G S T ST. it No. of 1 Thur. I No. or L Ln. Nominal Min. Nominal Paying Mln. Ston a Tnnab. TYPE Thm. Lana LM WldM Metllan MW4. P S flon ROM Lan th Len b Lxx Wdtft Lanz FL Wid.iFt.1 I WId.R. Wid FL WIdIFt WIdFt Ft. FL STREET CROSS-SECTION STANDARDS AT INTERSECTIONS No 8 12 2 11 28 6 9 118 140 225 150 PBD 8 12 2 11 28 a 9 140 164 225 150 MSD 6 12 2 it 28 6 9 116 140 225 150 WD d12 1 11 17 6 11.5 81 110 225 150 M4U 4 12 1 12 0 0 10 W 80 200 150 M d 12 1 12 0 0 10 80 80 1 50 100 C2U 2 12 1 12 0 0 12 M 80 150 75 STREET CRGS&SECTION STANDAROS AT MIDSLOCK No 6 12 0 NA 27 27 105 72 120 NA NA PBD 0 12 0 NA 2] 17 18.5 W tso r1A NA MBD 6 12 0 NA 17 17 Iss ]2 120 NA NA WD d 12 0 NA 17 17 125 x 80NA NA M4U d 12 0 NA 0 0 11 48 ]0 NA NA M d 11 0 NA 0 0 11 x 70 NA r4A C2U 2 18 0 NA 0 0 12 36 80 NA rLA Traffic Model Overview. The North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) completed the first traffic model for Allen in 1984. This model was used for the 1985 Comprehensive Plan and its update in 1992. In 1998, the City implemented a computer-based transportation model (TranPlan) which developed base line (year 2000) and forecast scenario for the year 2020. The model assesses land use changes and determines the effect of development on the existing and proposed thoroughfare system. The model applies regional demographic characteristics and roadway information to projected land uses within the City in order to estimate traffic volumes on individual segments. Traffic survey zones (TSZ) incorporated in the model correspond closely with the city's Neighborhood Planning Districts (NPDs) . Future Roadways. The Thoroughfare Plan (Map 4.1) shows the future expansion of the roadway system detailed on Table 4.3. during the next ten (10) years, based on the 2002 Impact Fee Study. This table also evaluates the 2002 Level of Service (LOS) on individual segments. Priority should be given to improving roadways with 4.4 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan a LOS of "D' or worse. Local roadway expansion and extensions are financed through County participation, developer contributions and impact fees. Expansions of state and federal roadway facilities receive some or all funding through TxDOT and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) funding, with some City and County funding. In areas that are fully developed, roadway expansion may also be financed through General Obligation bonds. The community's investment in its roadway system also requires that It protect roadway capacity. The capacity of thoroughfares is reduced by poorly controlled intersecting roadways, driveways and alleys. Maintaining capacity is accomplished through median and marginal access control, requirements for mutual access easements on private property developed for non-residential purposes, through roadway design and intersection improvements. Table4.3 Tan -Year Thoroughfare losrovemerd Plan BOUNDARY PARTICI ARTERIALEXISTING CITY PATION LENGTH 2002 PARTICIPATION by (FT) LOS FROM TO Others Allen Chaparral Main (FIR To baa 6lane Heights 2170) divided roadway 2lanes (SB) Build 1 inside lane to Chaparral (South PL) (ohdsitle) (SB) and 1 traffic 3,100 B signal 1 b Bethany Pada Place FM 2170 4lanes Build 2inside lanes 7,700 D (South PL) (outside) one each direction - Main (FM Stacy (FM To be a 4lane 2170) 2766) tlhlded roadway 2a Exchange Ten Oaks 2lanes (NB) 1 Build 1 lane (SB) 250 A South PL lane 58 2b South of Shelbom Stacy (FM 2786) 2lanes (NB) Build 2lanes (SB) 1.500 A Alma Hedgcoxa SH 121bi,.,,e To ba a 6lane dwided headway South ofBuild 1 inside lane 3a Hetlgcoxe Suncreek (SB) and 1 traffic 1,900 B si he 3b Tatum Build 2 inside lanes 1450 B Sougeek one each direction 3o -i Tatum Bel Airone Build 2 middle lanes 2.700 D each direction 3o-2 Tatum Bel Airone Build 2 oulslde lams 2,700 D each direction 3tl Bel Air Exchange 4 lanes Build2 inside lanes - 6,800 C outside one each tliredion 3e Wrgsley (Glendover RMgeview 3lanes NB) 2 Build l outside lane 1,500 B North PL lanes (BB) (SB) 3f Ridgeview SH 121 4lanes Build 2 outside lanes 2,00 B inside - one each direction Angel FM 2170 Stacy To be a 6lane divided roadway 48-1 FM 2170 Clear Build 4lanes -2 SB 1,800 Wines and 2 NB 4a-2 FM 2170 Clear Build 2 inside lanes - 1 600 Wines om each direction 4.5 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Table 4.3 Tan -Year Thoroughfare Improvement Plan BOUNDARY PARTICI ARTERIAL E%ISTINO CITY PATION lF-NO7N Mg3 PARTICIPATION by (Pt) LOS FROM TO OIMn Developer 4b Clear Muir Weods - Build 4lanes-3 SB build 1800 Springs and 1 NS lanes _ NB ac Muir Woods Oak Tree 4lanes Build 2 inside lams- 2'300 A outsitle ore each direction Build 4lanes - 2 SB 4d-1 Oak Tree Exchange - and 2 NB and 1 traffic ]00 C signal 4d-2 Oak Tree Exchange - Builtl 2lanes-ane ]00 C each direction 4e-1 Exchange NMiGsl�ing 2laws (SB) Build 2lanea (NB) 400 B (outside) 4o-2 Exchange WTispering 2 lanes (SB) Build 2 lanes -1 insitle lam SB 11 400 B Glen (outside) lam NB 41 WTispering Stacy slams Build 2 inside lams - Glen outside oneeac cirection 4.950 B Ordway Make PM 2551 To be a 6lane dlvlded roadway New 6lane divided County Sa Alma Watters - roadway 3lam pays 5,900 - Branch bridge and l traffic $2,425,00 si nal 0 Wintersre Build 2 inside lanes - 56 US ]5 (4olaws dde) one each direction 1,250 B and / taf c, signal Mien 4 lanes Build 2 inside lama - So1 US ]5 Heights (outside) one each direction 11,600 E and soundv211s Sul Allen Malone 4lanes Build 2 inside lams- Heights outside one each direction Maxwell 21ams New E lam divide! New, 50 Malone Greek Or (asphatl) and t traffic s nal x Build 4lanes - 1 $475K 5e �_ ply FM 2551 2Ia. (EB) inside lam EB 13 G'� uti ams WB on Chaparral SH 5 Allen To be a 6 lane Heights divided roadway, 6a Rosewood Brook Ridge Build 2 lanes and 2 Developer lane bridge Malone FM 2551 To be a 4lane tlhldad roadway 6b Malone FM 2551 - Build 4lanes and 1 2,700] tra0¢ si nal Cholaea Sbey SX 121 To ba a 6 lane Boulevard divided roe" ]a Stacy North of 3lanes (NS) Build3lanes (SB) Outlet Mall antl 1 taific si nal North of 2 lams New 6 lane divided ]b Outlet Mall SH 121 (grave0 roodway and 1 traffic nal 4.6 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Tab1e4B Tan -Year Thorou Mare lm rovement Plan BOUNDARY PARTICI ARTERIAL EXISTING CITY PATRON LENGTH 2002 PARTICIPATION by (FT) LOS FROM TO others Exchange SH 121 Angel Pkwy To be a 6 Zane Parkway divided roadway Be SH 121 Ridgeview - Build 6lanes- 2,100 - Build 4 lanes -3 lanes Bb Ridgeview West of 2lanes WB y I Inside lane EB 5,000 _ Two Creeks 4 bridge lanes and 1 traffic si nal West of Watters Bo -1 Twin Branch 41ares Build 2 inside lanes - 5,100 B Cheeks Creek ore each direction wafters wafters Build 4lanes -two 8,2 Branch Road 2lanes each direction and 1 2,800 D Creek bai0c signal WindsorBuiltl 2 inside lanes - Sc -3 Road US 75 4lanes one each direction 3,100 B and f traffic signal Bill SH 5 Tim0eibend 2lanes (EB) Build 2lanes (Al 4,600 D and f traffic signal Bill SH5 Timberbend 2lanes (EER Build 2lanes -ore Developer 4,600 D each direction Be T.beibend Angel Pkwy 2lanes (EB) Build 2 inside lanes - Developer 2,800 D one each direction Angel CityI To be a 4lane Pkwy divided roadway 9a Angel Pkwy City Limit New 4lane divided 2,950 roadwa FM 2551 Sorts City Main (FM To W a 6 Mm Limit 2170) divided roadway Build 3lanes (SB) of South City Main (FM 2lanes new w Eln divide t0a Limits 21701 (asphalt) roadway traffic TxDOT 9,600 D signals and street lights and sidewalks Hedges. CNebr Akm To be a 6 lam divided roadway 11a Custer East School 2lanes (WB) Build 1 inside lane 2'700 C ProvatlY (M) with median 11b East School Property Longwood! - Build 3 lanes (WB) 2,050 E itc Longwood Alma 2lanes (VVB) Build l inside lam 2,850 C (WB) Main (FM SH 8 FM 2551 To be a 6lane 2170) divided roadway Allen FM 2551 2lanes New 6 lane divided TxDOT- 5,900 F Hei his (asphalt) mad Custer US 75 To be a Elam t tlivided Medway Twin Creeks Builtl4lanes-1 Custer West 2lanes (EB) insitle lane EB 13 3.550 B Property (outode) lams WB 3lam ne bridge 4.7 2002.2022 Comprehensive Plan Table4.3 Tan -Year Thorou hiaro lm rovement Plan BOUNDARY PARTICI ARTERIAL EXISTING CITY PATCH LENGTH 2002 PARTICIPATION by (FT) LOS FROM TO O61ers Tvnn CrackWesl Twin Creeks New6lanedivided 13b East- roadway 6lane 3,200 Property Property bridge and 1 traffic Twin Line signal Twin Creeks East New 8 lama ne divided 13c Property Alma- roadway and 1 traffic 3,500 U. signal Winders Build 4lanes -7 13tl Alma Branch - Inside tare EB / 3 2,250 A lanes WE 13e Watters Brair Cental - New b lane divided!Developer roadway and 6lam Developer - Branch bdtl e for Build 4lanes -1 13f Bray Stacy - inside lane EB f 3 1,000 A Central lanes WB and 1 traffic si nal 13g Stacy US 75 New 6 lane divided 11900 roadway SH5 Chaparral Stacy (I'M To boa Elam 2]86) Wined roa0wey City pays for street his Exchange Stacy (FM 2lanes lights, rreatan, TxDOT 5,900 E 2]86) (asphalt) sidewalks, and utility relocation Stacy Road SH 121 SH S To be a 6lane =ay divided 2lanes Build 3lanes of new 15a US ]5 SHS (asphalt) 6lane divided! TxDOT 4,650 E roadway SH5 East City To be a 4Ism Limit Line dNMad roadway Build 2lanes of new 16a SH 5 Allen 2lanes 4lane divided TxDOT 2,250 E Heights roadway and 1 traffic si nal Allen Build 2lanes of new TXDOT i6b Heights Angel Pkwy 2lanes 4lane divided Developer 2,650 D roadway Build 2lanes of new 16c Angel Pkwy East City2lanes 4lane tlhd0ed TOOT 3,850 D Lima Line roadway and 1 VaiBc si nal Watters Bethany SH 121 To be a B lana =1 divided Reiuree 1]a Bethany Circe Vanes Build 2 inside lanes - 10,80(1 B NOM) one each direction RCirclee of 1]D Circe Waterford - Build B lanes - 3 NB 1,300 NOM Trade Tails and 35B 8 of New 6 lane divided 17c Waterford! BE 121 - roadway and 2 traffic 6,700 Trails signals 4.8 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Transit Currently Collin County Area Rural Transit (CCART) provides service to McKinney and Plano on appointment basis. The service is available to all citizens on a fee for service basis. Expansion of this service in conjunction with a regional system such as DART should be considered. The former Union Pacific Railway line from Plano to Sherman running through Allen was acquired by Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) in 2001. In the City of McKinney, the line remains in active use as a freight line, while in neighboring Plano the line has been converted to light rail. Actual DART light rail service to Plano will be available in 2003, where a bus system is also in operation. Extension of the light rail and bus system from Plano to McKinney is currently under study by the NCTCOG and is included in Mobility 2025. The study will evaluate ridership potential, financing, origination and destination analysis as well as environmental impact. The existing thoroughfare system and the location of Cottonwood Creek will require careful study which may require grade separation at critical locations, including arterial roadways and creek crossings. The opportunities for co -location of other modes including bicycle and pedestrian facilities should not be ovedooked. Phase II of the feasibility study should also address the type of station and facilities that will be needed to provide access to transit patrons, whether bus or light rail, including parking, multi -modal transfer points and assess opportunities for shared resources. Extension of light rail transit to Allen, if feasible, will provide an alternative mode of transportation intended to relieve roadway congestion on regional arterials as well as addressing regional air quality challenges. Bicycle Transportation. In 2001, the City adopted a Consolidated Alternative Transportation/Recreational Trail Plan shown here as Map 4.3. It also included trail design standards in the Allen Land Development Code. The trail system includes both on -street and off-street trails. Off-street trails are considered primarily mufti -purpose recreational trails, while designated on -street bicycle routes utilize the concept of "bicycle friendly" streets as an alternative to dedicated bicycle lanes. The designation of "bicycle friendly" streets as bicycle routes requires the careful selection of residential collectors with low to moderate traffic volumes linking strategic destinations, where a combination of signage and on -street parking control permits the safe operation of bicycles. The consolidated system creates necessary links without which neither alternative transportation nor the recreational trail system would function most efficiently to provide access to schools, work, and shopping. The system is integrated with the regional trail system adopted by Collin County and has connective links to systems in Fairview, McKinney, and Plano. The Six Cities Trail Plan identifies the Rowlett Creek corridor as the critical connection between cities since Cottonwood Creek, Watters Branch, and Mustang Branch eventually connect to Rowlett Creek. The terminus points for the Rowlett Creek Trail am Eldorado Parkway in McKinney on the north end and Lake Ray Hubbard on the south end. Future planning efforts may eventually designate the continuation of this trail to Lake Texoma. The on -street system will be identified by signage, and as various routes are fully implemented, it may be necessary to restrict on -street parking in certain areas. A significant portion of the recreational trail system will be financed and constructed by private interests as development occurs. Other financing sources include State Transportation Enhancement Program (STEP) and Texas Department of Parks 6 Wildlife funds. 4.9 AL1 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Table 4.4. SUMMARY OF REGIONAL TRAILS Trail Description Total Trail Trail Length in Allen Facilitates access to both sides of US 75 at Rowlett 14 miles Length Creek , Allen Dr, Exchange Parkway, and Stacy Rowlett Creek Terminus points are SH 121 and 22 miles 5.25 miles Rowlett Creek Loop Rowlett Creek on the north and 9 miles adjacent cities Rowlett Creek and US 75 on the south Watters Branch Loop Provides access to future rail corridor and CBD and is Watters Branch Terminus points are Watters Branch a north/south corridor 3.55 miles Cottonwood Creek Loop Creek and SH 121 on the north and 7 miles a CBD connection It also allows for a connection to Rowlett Creek near 75 on the south Mustang Branch. Cottonwood Creek Terminus points are Cottonwood 5.1 miles Creek and SH 121 on the north and Cottonwood Creek and Chaparral Road on the south. Mustang Branch Terminus points are Stacy Road and 4 miles Allen Heights on the north and Cottonwood Creek near Chaparral on the south A major design concept in the Consolidated Alternative Transportation/Recreational Trail Plan is the creation of a city-wide loop system (Allen Parkway Loop) that is comprised of smaller loops—Rowlett Creek Loop, Watters Branch Loop, and Cottonwood Creek Loop (See Table -4.5.). Natural geographic features such as creeks and major thoroughfares constitute the boundaries of these loop systems. Table 4 5 Allen Trail Loops Trail Features Trail Length Allen Parkway Loop Facilitates access to both sides of US 75 at Rowlett 14 miles Creek , Allen Dr, Exchange Parkway, and Stacy Road, and Ridgeview Dr. Rowlett Creek Loop Provides north/south corridor and vital connection to 9 miles adjacent cities Watters Branch Loop Provides access to future rail corridor and CBD and is 10 miles a north/south corridor Cottonwood Creek Loop Provides access to Watters Branch Loop to allow for 7 miles a CBD connection It also allows for a connection to Mustang Branch. The trail system includes 24 miles of on -street bike routes. Pedestrian Circulation. The basic unit of transportation is the pedestrian. Most of Allen's newer neighborhoods were constructed with sidewalks. In the older parts of the community additional attention should be given to pedestrian access, particularly access to schools and safe school crossings. In older areas that do not have sidewalks, sidewalks should be constructed as streets and roadways are expanded or reconstructed, or as resources become available. Improved pedestrian circulation is considered especially important in the redevelopment of the Central Business District (CBD), along SH 5 (Greenville Avenue), and Exchange Parkway east of SH 5. Conflicts with existing overhead utilities and 4.11 2002.2022 Comprehensive Plan limited rightsof-way represent a challenge to improving sidewalks in these areas Pedestrian access is also a critical element in providing access to transit. Even in areas which presently have adequate sidewalks, additional requirements should be considered to provide for bus shatters and transit stops. Also to be considered are the requirements for streetscape design and landscaping addressed in Chapter 8 Urban Design. Citizen Surveys The US Bureau of the Census reported that 86.1 % of workers over the age of sixteen drove alone to work, with approximately 7.7% carpooling. The median travel time to work was 30 minutes. These findings correlate with the 2002 Citizen Survey which found that 46.3% of households have two working adults. In addition 32.3% of male heads of household and 10.1% of females worked outside the home. Commuting times are illustrated in Figure 41. Source: 2002 Citizen Surrey Table 4.6. shows respondents' employment location. Table 4.6. Respondent Employment Location Work 1-ma0m Male Female len 10.3% 17.0 Ilas 23.6% 11.5 ism 0.7% 0.6 cxinney 2.7% 2.1 ano 16.3% 14.7 lahardson 12.2% 6.2 13.0% 6.6 AppWwble 13.1 34 9 Source: 2002 Citizen Survey Over 60% of respondents supported rail transit, although less than 25% fell it likely that they would ride a bus if provided. The perceived likelihood of utilizing transit to commute, for shopping or to attend special events is shown on Table 4.7. Over 70% of respondents reported that they would be "Very Likely" of "Somewhat Likely" to use transit for special events. Over 50% of respondents believed that the City should join DART, with 46.5% supporting the use of sales taxes (City, AEDC and ACDC) to support funding for transportation. 4.12 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Table 4.7. Respondents Anticipated Utilization of Mass Transit source: zuuz amen survey Priorities and Implementation Strategies. Priority: Develop and maintain an efficient and safe transportation system. Implementation Strategies: i. Maintain the Level of Service (LOS) *C" as the standard design objective for all thoroughfares and arterial roadways, including but not limited to, travel lanes, exclusive turning lanes and signal coordination. ii. Continue to require dedication of adequate rights-of-way as part of the development review process, as well as construction of improvements such as deceleration lanes to improve safety. iii. Continue to coordinate system improvements, including signalization, with the appropriate state agency. iv. Continue to evaluate funding alternatives for mobility enhancement. v. Maintain roadway capacity through control of median and margin access, requiring cross - access easements on non-residential property. vi. Roadway system standards should recognize the implications of land use decisions, and roadway classifications should be reassessed periodically. vii. Seek full implementation of the Thoroughfare Plan. viii. Obtain local control of arterial roadways SH 5, FM 2170, FM 2551 and FM 2786 through negotiation with T%DDT, once improved to urban standards. Priority: Improve school/park zone safety. Implementation Strategies: I. School and park sites should be located on collector streets only. it. Major intersections should be evaluated continuously for safety enhancements. iii. Coordinate with individual school districts to develop a school pedestrian routing plan for each school site and establish a school safety policy that addresses crosswalk standards, signage, and crossing guard protection. Priority: Expand use of other modes of transportation. Implementation Strategies: i. Seek closer relationship with agencies addressing the transportation needs of special populations. ii. Seek full implementation of the Consolidated Altemative Transportafion/Recreational Tmil Plan. iii. Develop light rail transit through DART. 4.13 xm o Very likely 9.4% 33.9% 18.49A 20.9 12A% 35.6 Swiewhat Likely 13.6% 27. 22. 14.3% 23.89A 35.3 of am 15.3% 12.3 17.4 10A% 15.1% 9.9 d Dkely 33.2% 13.4% 21.5% 22.7A 25.2 78 ewr 23.5% 11.5% 15.1 28.3 19.2% 9.3 source: zuuz amen survey Priorities and Implementation Strategies. Priority: Develop and maintain an efficient and safe transportation system. Implementation Strategies: i. Maintain the Level of Service (LOS) *C" as the standard design objective for all thoroughfares and arterial roadways, including but not limited to, travel lanes, exclusive turning lanes and signal coordination. ii. Continue to require dedication of adequate rights-of-way as part of the development review process, as well as construction of improvements such as deceleration lanes to improve safety. iii. Continue to coordinate system improvements, including signalization, with the appropriate state agency. iv. Continue to evaluate funding alternatives for mobility enhancement. v. Maintain roadway capacity through control of median and margin access, requiring cross - access easements on non-residential property. vi. Roadway system standards should recognize the implications of land use decisions, and roadway classifications should be reassessed periodically. vii. Seek full implementation of the Thoroughfare Plan. viii. Obtain local control of arterial roadways SH 5, FM 2170, FM 2551 and FM 2786 through negotiation with T%DDT, once improved to urban standards. Priority: Improve school/park zone safety. Implementation Strategies: I. School and park sites should be located on collector streets only. it. Major intersections should be evaluated continuously for safety enhancements. iii. Coordinate with individual school districts to develop a school pedestrian routing plan for each school site and establish a school safety policy that addresses crosswalk standards, signage, and crossing guard protection. Priority: Expand use of other modes of transportation. Implementation Strategies: i. Seek closer relationship with agencies addressing the transportation needs of special populations. ii. Seek full implementation of the Consolidated Altemative Transportafion/Recreational Tmil Plan. iii. Develop light rail transit through DART. 4.13 2002-2022 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 5. NEIGHBORHOODS & HOUSING Neighborhoods Residential neighborhoods are the core of the community. The continued integrity of these neighborhoods is a very high priority. Homeownership is a key element in preserving older neighborhoods, as is a commitment to code enforcement and property maintenance. Allen's older neighborhoods are generally 25 to 30 years old, with smaller residential units typical of a suburban bedroom community where housing was most affordable. More recent developments and increases in disposable income have resulted in low-density single-family detached housing catering to a relatively affluent population Aesthetics, environmental preservation and neighborhood amenities are the most significant characteristics of new development in 2002. While this trend is generally antithetical to widely touted principles of "smart growth," examples of various new urbanism concepts are currently under development. Their form returns to the more traditional grid, incorporating public open space in a formal pattern, but carefully limiting undesirable traffic. Allen's residential neighborhoods are generally centered around neighborhood elementary schools, and are combined with neighborhood parks where reasonable to do so. An important part of planning these neighborhoods has been the requirement to provide linkages between the neighborhoods by both local streets and a system of trails and greenbelts linking parks and schools. It is probably these amenities that are most lacking in the older subdivisions. Allen's reputation as a prestige community, bolstered by an excellent public school system is, however, at odds with the community's desire to provide a wide range of housing types, including "affordable" housing. It is for this reason that the preservation of the older neighborhoods, characterized by smaller homes and lots, is considered a high priority. It will be necessary to continue to upgrade infrastructure in several of these neighborhoods. The City should evaluate options to increase the levels of homeownership and to encourage the establishment of homeowner associations in areas where none exist. Continued emphasis on code compliance and property maintenance is recommended. Attached and multi -family housing is a clear alternative to expensive single-family detached housing where shared property maintenance may increase affordability. To the extent that the supply of this type of housing is market-driven based on a regional demand, the City may encourage the preservation of existing units and the creation of new units in higher density mixed use developments. Existing Housing Inventory The number and type of housing units fors the basis of population estimates between the decennial Census periods. Increasing urbanization establishes a greater need for higher density housing, a trend that is reflected in both Census and city estimates shown on Table 5.1. Housing units estimated for 2002 include those that are permitted for construction. Source: U.S.Bureauofthe Census 5.1 Table 5.1 Trends in Housing Types 1970 1980 1990 2000 2002 (est) -ousim Type Or % ! % M % Y % • % single Family 57 94.5 2, 95.9 6.674 91.8 15,61 $99% 16,51 843 Muni-family 2 4.4 1 3.9 590 8.1 1,7 101 2,9] 15.3 obile Home 1.1 03 7 01 0.0 00 Total 61 100.0 2.80 100.0 7.271 100.0 1]37 100.0 19,49 1000 Source: U.S.Bureauofthe Census 5.1 2002-2022 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Figure 5.1. Illustrates trends in permitting construction of new single-family detached housing. Figure 5.1 Trends in New Single Family Construction Source: Building B Code Compliance Equally important in assessing housing and neighborhood trends is information concerning the proportion of rental housing and housing vacancies. Table 5.2. provides a comparison between 1990 and 2000 Table 52. Housing Tenure 1 1 2000 .pied Housing Units 5, 17,20 I 27 -sonorous" Owner Occupied Housing Units 1 12,1 1 1, 1 1 Homeowner Vacancy rate 1 1 1 1 1 28.30 r Occupied Pe rsonslHousehoid �`11�111111111 1 1 31 Renter Occupied perso"Hourrehold 3. 2.8 Source: Building B Code Compliance Equally important in assessing housing and neighborhood trends is information concerning the proportion of rental housing and housing vacancies. Table 5.2. provides a comparison between 1990 and 2000 Table 52. Housing Tenure 1880 1 2000 .pied Housing Units 5, 17,20 scant Housing Units 27 1,02 Owner Occupied Housing Units 4,40a 12,1 Renter Occupied Units 1, 2,03 Homeowner Vacancy rate 3.00% 1.80 Rental Vacancy rate 4.40 28.30 r Occupied Pe rsonslHousehoid 3.11 31 Renter Occupied perso"Hourrehold 3. 2.8 SolRce: Us, Bureau of the Census 5.2 Census data. The high vacancy rate In rental units is probably attributable to new multi -family, units either under construction or just opening at the time the Census was taken. The decline in renter -occupied populationthousehold is significant 2002-2022 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Housing Costs The relatively high cost of housing in Allen may be traced to market demand for relatively low density housing and the desirability of public schools in Allen (Table 5.3). Table 5.3 Typical Residential Value NPD Land Improvements Total 1 Na Na ry, 2 Na Na IV 3 Na Na N 4 Na Na N 5 Na Na rd 6 40,5 130,053 170,55 7 78,859 167,710 249,58 8 44,550 164,732 209 28 9 44,550 118,048 160,59 10 we Na N 11 Na nfa N 12 44,550 118,048 160,59 13 48,600 155 466 204, 14 30,780 97,476 128,2 15 43,286 131,705 174,991 16 44,550 241,180 285,71 17 We Na N 18 34,000 136,081 170081 18 27,000 115,240 142,24 20 79,901 104,410 184,311 21 55,665 213448 269,11 22 52,167 155,139 207,30 23 We we Na 24 41,250 121,522 182,772 25 38,833 119,872 158,50 26 34,040 107,464 141,524 52,187 155139 207.30 Na We Na 32,500 112,500 145,0035,200 L29 115,525 151,72Na n/a nla 45187 138,838 180,84 Source: Collin County Appraisal District 5.3 2002-2022 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Housing Forecast The 10 -year forecast for single-family residential development by NPD is shown on Table 5.4. It is anticipated that all single-family residential will be built out prior to 2022, and that the majority will be complete during the next ten years Table 5.4. Ten -Year Estimate of Single Family Residential Construction Source Department of Planning B Development 54 Ad'uste0 SF Build -o Forecast 2002-2012 - HOusina Units g N 6 J d1 1 0 0 Na 00 a 0 0 0 a 0 Na 2 0 0 Na 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 Na 3 0 0 n/a 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 a a Na I a 0 Na 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Na 5 1 0 0 Na 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Na 8 2,32] 258 11.1% 71 124 138 164 1801 168 168 168 158 133 1,73 ]4.80 7 1,360 1,310 96.3% 20 8 0 0 0 0 1,3 10000 8 859 498 58.0% 1 55 54 2 48 3 25 14 0 85 100.00 9 965 32 3.3% 1 185 147 81 59 59 59 5 41 901 93.37 10 0 0 Na 0 0 0 0 0 Na 11 0 0 Na 0 0 0 0 0 0 Na 12 788 0 00% 28 53 66 40 40 40 40 40 38 49.11 13 450 344 784% 7 18 19 0 0 0 0 0 45 100.00 14 805 3 44.2% 4 1 15 70 4 40 40 40 40 76 95.28% 15 2,081 161 78% 391 49] 31 17 82 0 0 0 0 2.061 10000% 16 556 548 986% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 10000% 17 0 0 Wa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 nla 18 1,361 1,361 1000% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,361 10000% 19 2101 1,491 710% 102 72 74 70 70 65 67 60 30 2,101 10000 20 2,658 1,152 43.3% 37 56 25 52 40 40 40 40 1,55 5854 21 439 23 54.0% 1 32 25 25 25 30 25 0 43 10000% 22 761 51 881% 4 30 30 30 30 0 761 100.00 23 0 Na 0 0 0 0 0 Na 24 91 88 96.7% 0 0 3 a 0 0 0 01 d 91 100.00 25 2,477 2 94.8% Id 14 7 20 38 2 0 0 0 0 2,47 10000 26 2589 1,76 681 238 224 1371 41 68 4 35 21 11 0 2.58 100.00 27 426 a 00 841 84 60 6 60 30 30 18 42 100.00 28 0 0 Ne a a 0 0 0 Na 29 3,017 295 96.1 4 11 0 0 0 3,01 100A0 30 1,139 777 68.2 98 30 45 3 2 2 1,13 100.00 31 331 331 100.0 0 0 331 100. otal 27,561 16532 60.0 1,469 1,336 1,372 1 0431 960 762 819 552 408 312 25,36 1 92.03 Source Department of Planning B Development 54 2002-2022 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Housing Needs — Special Populations The percentage of elderly in Allen has remained relatively constant. This population has specialized housing needs: relatively small, low maintenance, in close proximity to shopping and health care. The parking requirements for Independent living housing for the elderly may be adjusted down. Access to transit is highly desirable. Neighborhood Preservation The City should assist in the development of neighborhood associations in neighborhoods where none exist. A plan for the preservation of each neighborhood should be established in conjunction with that group. Even though older neighborhoods do not have common areas for maintenance that require fees, the formation of homeowner associations would create neighborhood cohesion and the mechanism for communication and assistance in resolving neighborhood issues. Homeownership should be encouraged Two homeownership programs sponsored by the Department of Housing & Urban Development are directed toward assisting professional police officers and teachers, provided they remain in the home for at least three years. The City may wish to consider other fortes of assistance for prospective purchasers in targeted residential redevelopment areas. Property maintenance and code compliance remain extremely important in maintaining the quality of older residential neighborhoods. As in many enforcement programs, community assistance in reporting and monitoring violations is extremely important. Citizen Surveys— Housing & Neighborhoods Housing In 1997, the results of the survey indicated that the three most important reasons people moved to Allen were the relatively small size of the community, the quality of the public schools, and the cost of housing. The results on questions of the availability of subsidized Senior and affordable housing were more ambivalent, with only 35% and 40% of respondents respectively in agreement. In 2002, citizens rated new housing developments as "good" to "excellent" (81.7%) and existing residential development "Average" to "Good" (75.1%). The 2002 survey explored additional questions relative to housing choice, with results that both confirmed and expanded the earlier findings, although the questions were framed somewhat differently in each survey. While 58.6% of respondents indicated that they would choose their next home in Allen, those who would not cited the following reasons for that decision (See Table 5.5) Table 5.5. Reasons for not selecting next home in Allen Source: 2002 Citizen survey Table 5.6 identifies the factors considered important in selecting a new home. Table 56 Percentage Factors in Choice of a Home Criteria Very Important Imponsnt Somewhat Important Not Important Floor Plan 750 185 11 03 Lot Sae 49.6 34.8 9.0 1.2 Energy Efficiency 49.6 36A 80 06 ley Entrance 23.5 24.6 18.6 26.8 Street Entrance 16.6 22 19.7 32 5 Unique Architecture 23.1 37.3 243 9.1 Housing Diversity 21.8 1 36 23.5 12.4 2002 Citizen Survey 5.5 2002-2022 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Respondents indicated by 12.9% that their next home would be smaller, with 29.6% the same size and 41.4% larger. The size of respondent's "next home" is summarized on Table 5.7. Assuming that the housing market is reflected in the results of the survey, it would appear that the policy of encouraging a variety of housing sizes in single-family detached housing should be reconsidered. To the extent that there is a strong correlation between dwelling size and affordability, it would appear that affordability should be considered a priority only in the multi -family market. Table 5 7. Square Footage of "next home" Square footage % Under 1,400 19 1,400-2,000 184 2,Om-2,900 29.9 2,601-3,000 224 3,2014,000 15.2 Over 4,000 3.7 Source: 2002 Citizen Survey The perceived need for specialized housing is summarized on Table 5.8. Table 5.8 Housing Need in Percentages Criteria Strong Need Some Need Small Need No Need Assisted Living 194 36.0 20.7 7.4 Retirement Community 164 35.9 23 8.6 Seniors Only Community 10.7 26.4 249 178 Estate lots 9.7 20.9 264 183 Smaller Lot Size 1.5 71 129 63 1 ffordable Housing 16.4 25.5 202 256 2002 Citizen Survey The choice of neighborhoods clearly plays a significant role in selection of housing. Neighborhood factors, including the existence of a Homeowners Association, amenity centers and the location of schools and parks were identified as important by a majority of respondents. Table 5.9. shows the results of the 2002 survey relative to neighborhoods. Table 5.9. Choice of Neighborhoods Criteria Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important eighborhocd Association 10.1 18 241 414 ublic Pools 10.1 17.6 25.5 40.6 eighborhood Amenity Center 11.9 26.6 28.4 265 oration of Schools 34.4 28.1 117 195 Location of Parks 29.8 37.6 17.2 9.6 Survey 5.6 v{grY�'{rYYlKeli51=14.1.111M /211 Neighborhoods In 2002, 86.5% of respondents were satisfied or somewhat satisfied with the City's control of residential development. Factors important in preservation of existing neighborhoods are appearance and code enforcement. The results of the survey are summarized in Figure 5.2. 600 0 500 e 40.0 S 30.0 ¢ 200 0 70.0 00 Fig. 5.2. Citizen Survey �\ac` 01F, p�0��0 ` eoo` ■Code Enforcement ■Neighborhood Appearance Source 2002 Citizen Survey Citizen perception of fresh and litter as a problem remains virtually unchanged since 1997 as shown in Figure 5.3 Concerns about high weeds and unmowed grass shows a shift from almost 65% of respondents identifying it as not a problem and 28% as somewhat of a problem in 1997 to approximately 45% identifying it as not a problem and 43% as somewhat of a problem in 2002. Those identifying this as a serious problem remained fairly constant at under 10% both in 1997 and 2002. This shift from not a problem to somewhat of a problem is almost certainly the result of increasing urbanization within the City. Figure 5.3. Perception of Trash d Litter 70.0% S e0.0% o 40 0% 01997 30.0% 02002 20.0% 10.0% 'ES E 19 z 1oa" 0 n E source'. Citizen Smays 5.7 2002-2022 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Priorities and Implementation Strategies Priority. Provide a diverse range of housing to meet the needs of present and future residents which efficiently utilizes land resources and essential city services. Implementation Strategies: i Continue to maintain and administer strong zoning and building regulations, and property maintenance code enforcement. ii. Plan for a variety of housing densities, including estate residential. iii. Continue to use high density residential and owner occupied medium density residential to buffer single family uses. iv. Support housing for special populations, including assisted Irving and development for senior citizens. v. Encourage variety of architecture, floor plans, and building materials in housing developments. Priority. Development of well-planned, stable residential neighborhoods throughout the city. Implementation Strategies: I. Protect residential development from more intense intrusive land uses, with higher densities located closest to major arterials or commercial centers. ii. Buffer residential uses from unnecessary traffic congestion and minimize cut -through traffic. iii. Maintain and strengthen partnerships with homeowner associations to effect voluntary code compliance. iv. Maintain Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) review of neighborhoods to improve security. v. Residential subdivisions should be adequately connected to adjacent neighborhoods by transportation and pedestrian ways to reinforce the larger community. vi. Multi -family density should not exceed 18 units/developable acre and 350 units per individual development. There should be no more than two complexes in a district. Complexes should be separated and they not be located adjacent to each other and should require separation by other land uses. Priority: Initiate neighborhood preservation activities in target neighborhoods. i. Identify distressed neighborhoods and develop individual plans to preserve neighborhood integrity. ii. Utilize housing assistance programs that are offered by other public agencies to encourage home ownership in target areas. iii. Work to organize neighborhood homeowner associations where none exist. iv. Continue to improve infrastructure in residential areas. Residential infrastructure includes alleys, street lighting, sidewalks, drainage, streets, and utilities. 5.8 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan 6. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Employment & Industry Recent years have seen the growth of economic development as a legitimate function of city govemment in partnership with the private sector. Economic development forjobs, for needed goods and services for residents, and for tax base to sustain the community have become so visible and important that communities can no longer afford to leave them to chance. As an important part of the North Dallas area growth corridor, Allen's efforts have been directed toward influencing the quality, mix and level of economic units and offering incentives to lure industry and commerce into Allen. Still, the market becomes continually more competitive and Allen is marketing itself and its advantages in order to meet its long-range goals. $140,000,000 $120,000,000 4 $100,000,000 a E80,000,000 8 $6010001000 m j $40,000.000 $20,000,000 $0 The gross sales for all major industries have grown from $145,138,329 in 1990 to $1,014,636,237 in 2001, a 600% rate of growth (Figure 6.2) Figure 6.1. Non Residential Building Permits m o 0 Fmum e.2 2m1 cess $mss ui MWI Dl .iml twss.W. Tr ­ The retail sector alone has grown from $77,529,389 in 1990 to $509,231,758 in 2001, a 560% increase. (Figure 6 3) The strength of the Allen economy can be seen in the diversification that has occurred since 1990. The city has benefited from 24 new major industries along with the development of major retail centers including the Allen Premium Outlets, Allen Central Market and Twin Creeks Village. 6.1 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan The city's diversification has attracted other services including Presbyterian Hospital -Allen and the Hilton Hotel. OW., •ul.ow gr at Millions Fl,.. 6.3. 2001 Gmn nelall$alas W ces ory Vol 0$47062,792 Msa6,416.W Os30s96 302 O Beall, Melenals •camral Mere.nel:e o F -d doles Onaemmwa M4,eel6rc asodea • Xomn Fumislnngs •Rees.... ]s121)a0,4e4 0Miw, Resell Figure SA. Grose Sales of Major Industries 6.2 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan The number of employed residents climbed from 10,707 in 1990 to 19,500 in 2001, an increase of 82%. In 2002, the Allen Independent School District employed 1,460 persons, and the City of Allen employed 504. Unemployment has consistently been lower than the Dallas MSA and State levels as shown in Figure 6.5. Figure 6.5 Unemployment Data 8n So 1990 - t1995 )pOD 2002 20012p 40 Annual Annual Annual Nov.% O U.s. 5.6 5.6 4.0 5.3 6.0 •Texas 6.3 6.0 3.4 4.9 6.2 OOallas MSA 5.1 43 3.1 4.8 6.0 OAllen 3.5 3.0 1.8 3.7 5.7 Figure 6.6 Consumer Price Index 200 9 1990 1995 2000 2001 2002 ❑ National 130.7 152.4 172.2 177.4 181.3 ■ DFW 125.11 144.9 164.4 171.5 173.6 Figure 6.7. Sales Tax Revenues FY 1992-2001 514,000,000 512,000,000 $10,000,000 58,000,000 --- $6,000,000 54,000,000 -_..... ®.. The Allen Chamber of Commerce plays an active role in economic development in Allen. The Chamber provides technical assistance to its members, prospective businesses, and citizens. The Chamber had 581 members in 2002. 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 OGty Sales aEconomlc Development (4a) DCommunity Development (4b) The City of Allen plays an important role in economic development through its involvement with the Allen Economic Development Corporation (AEDC), Allen Community Development Corporation (ACDC), Allen Independent School District (AISD), Collin County Community College District (CCCCD), Collin County and the Allen Chamber of Commerce. The City interacts with prospective clients in the planning and engineering process and also establishes the diversification of land use and master planning for the community. A key indicator of the City's 6.3 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan overall economic health and support for additional economic development activities are sales tax revenues. See Figure 6.7. The AISD and CCCCD provide key elements to economic development through their educational support that enhances the skills of the workforce and elevates the quality of life. The Collin County Commissioners Court has also been highly supportive of economic development activity in Allen through the use of incentives and other programs. In 1992, the voters of Allen approved a half -cent sales tax for economic development and the formation of the AEDC. The AEDC is structured as a "4A" corporation under the State of Texas with specific requirements on the use of economic development funds. The corporation's primary mission is to provide new jobs and corporate value on the local tax rolls. This mission is achieved through the recruitment of corporate citizens and retention of existing companies. A five -member Board of Directors appointed by the Allen City Council oversees the activities of the AEDC. In 1993, the AEDC purchased and developed 92 acres into Millennium Technology Park. The success of this project spurred the development of Enterprise Business Park and other areas for industrial and commercial development. Millennium Corporate Center, developed by the AEDC is designed as a first class, mid -rise office product. Allen Station Business Park is designed for office/tech users Allen Commerce Center (96 -acres) and Twin Creeks Business Park (562 acres) are master planned parks, allowing a mix of office, light manufacturing, medical, and retail uses. The business and industries recruited by AEDC as of 2002 have added over four million square feet of industrial, office, office/warehouse space, and retail space in Allen. This translates into $527 million in added taxable value and 5,188 jobs created by the companies as of 2002. (see Table 6.1.). The AEDC will continue to work diligently to retain and attract business and industry that is environmentally sound and that brings significant taxable value and quality jobs to Allen. 6.4 2002.2022 Comprehensive Plan Table 6.1. AEDC Projects as of 2002 Company Type of Facility Square Feet Employees Taxable Value ompmtio Experian iational debt center 300,000 730 It 38,977,812 1993 mon CorpontbNOuest Medical redical equipment vanufacturing 105,000 115 $ 11,208,929 1994 chotronlcs hotomask production 63,000 196 $ 32,945,820 1995 Sunbelt Telecommunications lecemmunicehans uipment/serNces 50,000 52 $ 23,731,302 1996 RCL Enterprises/Color Cynamlce utshshera 340,000 280 $ 17,427,801 1997 FSl international nericanductor menuactunng 162,000 240 $ 18,002,852 1997 ack Henry& Associates n(crmation processing 80,000 15O $ 11,930,332 1998 Mykrolis imo-electronics/gas technology 17eOD0 282 $ 28,198,900 legs )ay Laboratories armaceutical anufacturingldistnbullon 117,000 65 It 5,138,099 1998 C13s/InarCommerclal Business Systema secommunica0ons nanufacturing 102,000 100 $ 5,342,937 1998 Sell Semiconductor unnimmductor menufactunng 60,000 48 $ 9,229,756 1988 kinetic, Inc. leftoonductor manufacturing 35,000 41 S 5,220,686 1999 II Metals Fabricating, ncorporaterl uxtbornized sheet metal aluncation 70,000 36 $ 4,971,799 1999 fiber Systems International ber optic interconnect echnologies 50,000 85 $ 8,000,000 2002 go Telecommunications aml and long distance elephone service 88,000 400 $ 1677,697 1999 Iten Central Market atal 353,000 Na $ 30,795,311 1999 in Creels Village Retail 450,000 we $ 46,866,048 19% IT Entertainment nuffi.nnedia production 70,680 156 It 9.482,368 2000 alsytek istnbMr of computer & office supplies 45,000 350 $ 3,194,142 2000 bra org-haul fiber optics 84,400 160 $ 10,474,162 2000 T&T Wlmless data center 110,000 150 $ 48,888,882 2000 TSIT Internet Dam Center ntemetMeb hosting 110,000 23 $ 14,406,680 2000 risby Han Hospital sp"Wnedical offices 132,000 200 $ 6.624,418 2000 I" Premium Dutiets Recoil 458,000 700 $ 49,014,055 2000 fix, Inc. lecommunic ltions/dam conanumications 98,600 186 $ 15,883,012 2000 icron TechnologyIconouctor memory solutions 45,000 SO $ 2.194,617 2001 Icatel isinbution/assembly 262,000 338 $ 59,359,752 2001 Ilton Hotel olell.m,.ntumcenter 80.000 N/a $ 13,000,000 2002 TOTALS 4,078,880 5,188 Source 6.5 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan ..,feLlnology District #Allen, Texas •uey na. aw fe Jim Wilson Photography Ce 4 �,y,i� Y Pyny � � 1 6.6 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan In 1996 the voters approved the half cent sales tax for creation of the ACDC. A seven -member board appointed by the Allen City Council oversees the activities of the ACDC. The ACDC can use funds for professional and amateur athletics, entertainment and tourism, parks and public spaces, transportation, and other projects that promote new or expanded business enterprises. These "quality of life" issues are paramount to any successful economic development efforts. Since its inception, the ACDC has approved funding and supported projects such as those shown in Table 6.2. Table 6.2. CDC CIP for Years 1997-2001 Description Amount Description Amount CoRcnwood Creek Bridge $66,000 Median BeaWfication Project $150,000 Library CD-ROM System $27,500 Water Park Location Study $30,000 Ub CD-ROM Musk Collection $24,200 Alien USA Celebration 2000 $40,000 Allen Heights Sbeeelghts $55,000 Shadow Lakes Redevelopment $209,000 Allen Station Park 36M Park Trail Planning $60,000 Chamber Office 550,000 SL Maryh Baptist Church Renovation and TEXAS Learning Garden $89,000 Heavy Rescue Vehicle $550,000 Amanda Dunbar Painting $15,000 Collector Sidewalks Project $220,000 Falkland Acquisition (Fission Properly) $174,000 1998 Allen USA Celebration $20,000 Natatorium - Athletic Facilities etc, Is M Computer -Aided Dispatch System $263,118 Civic Center Pima Phase 2 $300,000 Interpretive Monument at AS Park Dam $28,842 Additional Funding for Natatodum $50,000 Portable Electronic Traffic Signs $30,000 Fire & Severe Weather Safety House $40,210 Additional Funds -Allen Heights Stree6ighls $32,000 Bethany Lake Clubhouse Renovation $30,000 Neighborhood Parks -Green & Shadow Lakes $422,000 Boyd Elementary Pavilion $30,000 AAA Sponsorship of Allen Philharmonic $10,000 Ford East Park Renovations $210,000 1999 Alen USA Celebration $30,000 Ford West Playground 560,000 Additional Funds-CollectorSidewalks $185,000 Coftonwood Bend Playground $37,000 Library Materials $60,000 Rend Park Playground $78,800 2 Thermal Image Cameras $50,000 Historic Dam Preservation $2201000 Sponsorship-TAAF Softball Tournament $10,000 Trail System $270,000 Allen Station Hentage Center $280,000 State Highway 5 Sidewalks Phase II $250,000 Public Safety Mobile Data Computers $603,000 Malone Community Park Playground $175,000 Additional Par land for Mien Station Park $195.000 Boyd School (Under -served Perk Areas) $200,000 Add Funding -Collector Sidewalks $165,000 Malone Community Park $1.6M Fire Training Materials $5,500 Hillside Park $100,000 99-W Allen Ars Alliance Funding $109,000 Skry Park Development $400,000 Renovation of Lakeside Clubhouse & Parking $257,000 Alen Station Park Planning $300,000 EMS Reporting System $121,000 Tree Farm $501000 Sewer TV Inspection Truck $901000 New Central Ubrary $600.000 Narcotics Surveillance Vehicle $82,500 Mustang Creek Channel Phase 11 $60,000 When Allen Heights witandscapbg $300,000 Civic Organreation Monument Sign $8,000 Allen ISD Fatuity Literacy Program $44,500 Allen Heritage Guild Historic Village $150,000 Allen Drive Improvements $700,000 Emergency Warning System $150,000 6.7 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Opportunities & Challenges Major factors that will influence business and industry to locate in Allen will be: • Central time -zone location • Proximity to markets • Transportation • Utilities availability • Land availability • Skilled workforce • Right-to-work • Labor costs • Access to educational resources Citizen Survey Citizens were asked to rate both the Allen Economic Development Corporation (AEDC) and the Allen Community Development Corporation (ACDC). While rated positively overall as shown on Table 6.3. the number of respondents unaware of the activities and function of each board is significant, indicating the need for additional publicity concerning their role and activities. • Quality of life • Availability of services • Business climate • Atmospheric climate • Economies of scale due to urban agglomeration • Streamlined permitting and planning process R InQ AEDC ACDC �ery posithas 17.8% 11.8 ositive 27.3% 28.1 omewhat Positive 11.9% 148 Not Positive 3.0% 01 No Opinion 132% 117% Does not know function 237% 252 Table 6 3 Rating the AEDC and ACDC Over 46% of respondents reported being "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" with the types of companies brought to Allen by the AEDC, but 26.6% indicated that they did not know the types of businesses. Similarly, 39.9% of respondents felt that ACDC had contributed positively to the City, but 25.2% did not know what the ACDC does. Questioned about the allocation of ACDC funding, a significant portion of the respondents supported the funding of diverse projects, including the redevelopment of the Central Business District and Library development. Table 6.4. summarizes the responses Table 6.4. ACDC Funding Preferences Citizen's priorities in supporting development activities is summarized on Table 6.5. M. Yes J No I NoOpinion Redevel menl 40.8% 242% 19d mvements37A% 21.9% 1ilities [BD for the Arts 32.2% 293%a tlevelo ment 5].d% 13.8%Chan e' 42% ].6% 245 ' 63 ]% Did not respond to this Question Source 2002 Cozen Survey Citizen's priorities in supporting development activities is summarized on Table 6.5. M. 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Table 6.5. Citizen Support for Additional Development Priorities and Implementation Strategies Priority: Develop an economy that will generate jobs, provide shopping and service opportunities and a strong financial base for Allen Implementation Strategies: i. The city should maintain an aggressive posture recruiting desirable business and industry. ii. Work diligently to strengthen and retain existing business and industry, providing assistance when requested iii. Strengthen Allen's marketplace positioning through marketing, community leadership, and development of strategic alliances. Priority. Encourage diversity in economic development Implementation Strategies: i. Provide for a variety of residential, retail, commercial, office and industrial land uses, including mixed use development that will encourage diversity in the economic base. R. Provide industrial and commercial/office zoned land for future development. iii. Continue to enhance infrastructure development (road thoroughfares, water, sewer, storm drainage) and services as an economic development goal. iv. Emphasize quality and appearance factors in development (site planning, design and architectural quality). v. Continue the fast-track development review process as an incentive for high quality business and industry. vi. Develop balanced housing market to ensure a diverse labor force to meet workforce needs. vii. Support educational programs that enhance the skills, development and education level of both children and adults, to assure a skilled workforce. viii. Encourage and support a mix of entertainment venues to complement workforce and residential development. Priority: Provide for sympathetic redevelopment in the Central Business District (CBD) for low to medium density uses, including office, retail, restaurants, service and employment uses, and high density residential uses. (See CBD for Implementation Strategies) M - 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan 7. ENVIRONMENT A portion of this section is taken from the 1986 Allen Linear Greenbelt Park Study prepared by Albert H. Halff & Associates, Inc. Geology and Topography The strata of rocks which outcrop in the Dallas and Collin County area were all formed during the upper Cretaceous period, which extended from 50 to 135 million years ago.' The formations which surface from west to east across Collin County are the Eagle Ford, Austin Chalk and Taylor Mad. These strata are predominantly of shale limestone, chalk, and mad. The formations dip eastward at regular rates averaging 50 feet per mile and become thinner westward towards the outcrop.2 Eagle Ford shale underlies the entire county and is near the surface in the northwestern part of the county. Austin chalk overlies Eagle Ford shale and consists of alternating beds of chalk, chalky limestone, and seams of marl. This formation is several hundred feet thick and outcrops in numerous locations within Allen. There are a few Austin Chalk (limestone) rock quarries in Allen. These are the only known geologic resources that occur within the region. The surface formations in the Allen area are sediments derived from the weathering process of the parent rock. Along the streams are Quaternary deposits that were laid down chiefly during the Pleistocene era.3 The topography or relief affects soil formation through its influence on drainage, erosion, plant cover and soil temperature. In much of Collin County, the soils have slopes of less than three percent.4 Figure 7.1. illustrates the general topography in Allen. The highest points in Allen are around 720 to 725 feel above mean sea level (MSL) and are located in the central and southwestern corner of the City. The regional slope is to the south-southeast and the lowest point within Allen occurs along Rowlett Creek at elevation 550 MSL. The elevation differential between the highs and lows within the City is about 175 feet. The steepest slopes are eight to ten percent and occur in the transition zones between the flat floodplains and uplands and are associated with the major streams. ' Dallas Geological Society. The Geology of Dallas Count (Dallas, Texas; The Dallas Geological Society, December, 1965) p12 ' Ilad., D 126 ' ILS. Depamment of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Serace. Soil Survey Collin County. Texas In ceocenabon.th Texas Aancultural Experiment Station. June 1969. D.49. Ibid. 7.1 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan I;-' 72 f \ �C F Q IF y 8 ! 72 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Soils The principal soils of Rowlett Creek and its major tributaries consist of the Trinity, Frio, Austin, Altoga, Houston Black, and Lewisville Series. Map 7 1 illustrates the soil types along the floodplain corridors. The following soil descriptions indicate the qualities and suitability for soils found in the study area as described by the Soil Conservation Services Soil Survey for Collin County, Texas.' a. Trinity The Trinity series consist of deep calcareous soils which lie along major streams in floodplains. They are generally found on slopes of less than 1 percent. The surface dark gray clay layer is about 5 inches thick. Underneath it lies a firm dark gray clay layer of about 14 inches containing free lime, and below it a wide layer up to five feet of dark -gray very firm clay The clays are subject to deep cracking during dry periods The Trinity soil has a very low permeability and water slowly penetrates the soil after the cracks close. Small amounts of Frio soils may occur with Trinity soils. Two kinds of Trinity clay are shown on the soils topography map: 1. Trinity Clay, frequently flooded (Tp, lies on the floodplain of Rowlett Creek. The area experiences frequent flooding which leaves behind thin deposits of silty material and litter The surface is irregular and occasionally has partly filled old stream channels or channel scars. Surface run-off is very slow. Although flooding is frequent, the wooded areas offer good wildlife habitats. Because of its limitations due to frequent flooding and its natural scenic and wildlife opportunities, the Trinity soil is best suited for passive recreation such as hiking, bird watching, and conservation areas 2. Trinity Clay, occasionally flooded (To), lies on the floodplain of Rowlett Creek and West Rowlett Creek and at the confluence with Rowlett Creek and Watters Branch. The soil surface occasionally undulates and the average slope is 5 percent. Surface runoff is slow. b. Frio The Frio series consists of deep praine loamy soils lying on slopes of less than 1 percent. The top layer is a dark grayish -brown heavy clay about 6 inches thick underlain by a dark heavy clay loam containing free lime and averaging 20 inches. The layer beneath is about 55 inches of grayish brown clay loam. Frio soils are moderately permeable. Available water capacity and fertility are high. Two kinds of Frio soil characterize the Rowlett floodplain. 1. Frio clay loam, frequently flooded (FO, has a slightly thicker surface area than the typical Frio series composed of about 22 inches of dark grayish -brown friable clay loam containing free lime. Underneath lies a layer of grayish -brown heavy clay loam. The soil is moderately permeable and has slow surface run-off. 2. Frio clay loam, occasionally flooded (Fo), is nearly level averaging 0.5% slope, with a profile similar to the typical field series It has moderate permeability and high available water capacity. 'IMd 7.3 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan J O x ;i it I -J ri LL C. s i 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan c Austin The Austin soils are deep, calcareous, clayey soils that are gently sloping to sloping. In a typical profile, the surface layer is about 16 inches thick and consists of dark grayish -brown, calcareous silty clay. Underneath lies a 14-9nch layer of calcareous silty clay followed by a substrata of pale brown silty clay and lime. This soil's permeability is moderately slow, the moderate available water capacity and moderate to severe erosion potential. Two kinds of Austin soil occur in the floodplain corridor 1. Austin silty clay, 3-5% slopes, eroded (AuC2) has a soil profile similar to the typical profile and Iles on convex slopes. Surface runoff is moderately rapid. The hazard of water erosion Is moderately severe, while available water capacity is moderate and permeability is slow. 2. Austin silty clay, 5-8% slopes, eroded (AuD2) lies on convex slopes. The soil has a thinner column than the typical profile and is calcareous throughout Surface runoff is rapid. The hazard of water erosion is moderate. d. Other Soils Other soils found in the Rowlett Creek floodplain area include. 1. Altoga Silty Clay, 5-8% slopes, eroded (AID2), occurs on uplands and stream terraces and have slopes which are sloping to strongly -sloping and eroded to severely -eroded. Its profile consists of an upper layer of approximately 7 inches of light silty clay underlain with 53 Inches of light silty clay of dark or brownish -gray. Surface runoff is rapid. The hazard of erosion Is severe, permeability is moderately slow, and available water capacity is moderate. 2. Eddy Gravelly Clay Loam, 3-8% slopes eroded (E1D2), occurs on convex ridges and knobs and in areas that slope to natural drainways. The surface layer consists of about 4 inches of gravelly clay loam and free lime with scatterings of chalk fragments underlain by a layer of whitish chalk and grayish -brown clay loam, underlain by chalky limestone. 3. Houston Black Clay, 2-4% slopes, eroded (HOB2), is about 32 inches thick consisting of a surface layer of calcareous clay in small depressions. Underneath lies about 48 inches of light -gray calcareous clay. Surface runoff is moderately rapid and water erosion is moderately severe in sloping areas. 4. Lewisville Silty Clay, 3-5% slopes, eroded, lies in stream terraces and stream slopes. The surface layer is dark grayish -brown, calcareous light silty clay about 11 inches thick underlain by grayish -brown calcareous, firm silty clay. Permeability is moderately slow, available water capacity is moderate, surface runoff is moderately rapid, and the hazard of erosion is moderately severe. 5. Stephen -Eddy Complex, 3-6% slopes, eroded, are primanly composed of Stephen silty clay (70%), Eddy gravelly loam (25%) and other soils which are primarily Austin. They are found on ridgetops or areas sloping to streambeds. Stephen soil is well -drained, has moderately slow permeability, with moderate water capacity. Eddy soil, however, has low water capacity. This soil suffers a moderately severe to severe hazard of erosion. Climate Collin County lies at the northern edge of a humid, subtropical climatic zone The climate is generally mild, with moderate winters and hot summers Dallas, located 15 miles to the south, has a mean annual temperature of 65.5°F, with an average temperature of 85°F in July and 461F in January. The area has an average of 94 days with temperatures above 90°F and 37 days with temperatures below 32°F. The area's mean annual rainfall is 34.5 inches. The heaviest precipitation usually occurs in April, May, and June. The mean annual snowfall is 2.1 inches. The average relative humidity Is 64 percent. The prevailing surface winds are southerly with an average wind velocity of 10.9 miles per hours a Dallas MDmiig News, Texas Almanac antl State Industrial Gude 1976-1977 (Dallas, Texas A. H. Belo Corporation. 1975) pp. 16&177 7.5 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan V*en areas in close proximity to each other experience measurable climatic differences, the localized Conditions constitute microclimates. The major creeks of North Central Texas in association with their surroundings create microclimates, differing somewhat from the region's overall climate. These areas typically experience lower temperatures, wind speeds, and solar -radiation intensities, and a high relative humidity. The primary factors that affect creek microclimates are trees and the streams' side slopes The orientation of a channel side slopes has a great effect on the microclimate. A slope facing south will receive more sunlight, making its microclimate noticeably hotter than that of a slope facing north. The slope facing south will experience more evaporation, while the slope that faces north has a much greater relative humidity. These distinct microclimates on the north and south channel slopes may support different types of fore and fauna. Creek microclimates create a more tolerable habitat, for many life forms and therefore provide a better habitat than that found in the majority of the Allen area Variations in creek microclimates foster a great diversity of species, making floodplain of special ecological value and interest. Biological Features The land use or land Cover directly influences the type and diversity of both plants and animals inhabiting an area. An environmental inventory of the Rowlett Creek basin was prepared by the Corps of Engineers as part of their Expanded Floodplain Study of Rowlett Creek,' based on a literature survey for the entire Rowlett Creek Study area, and was based on land cover/habitat types which are grouped into ten habitat Categories. Much of the study area can be expected to be Inhabited by a wide array of species. The species expected to be found In each land cover/habitat Category is displayed in Table 7.1. Table 7.1. SUMMARY OF SPECIES BY LAND COVERIHABITAT CATEGORY HABITAT CATEGORY PLANTS AMPHIBIANS REPTILES BIRDS MAMMALS FISH TOTAL ANIMALS TOTAL SPECIES Residential, Urban and Parks and Open Spam 62 3 8 32 16 -- 59 121 Cropland 18 2 12 26 9 - 49 67 Grassland 135 6 17 57 17 - 97 232 Confined Feeding 18 1 4 16 6 - 27 45 Forest Land 111 9 31 60 25 - 125 236 Water Bodies 6 12 16 38 2 59 127 133 Barren Land and Stnp Mines -Inactive 33 -- 4 - -- - 4 37 Fence Rowe 121 320 55 14 - 92 213 Wetlands 65 16 22 34 10 - 82 147 Ecotone. 91 3 10 22 20 - 55 146 SourceCorps of Engineers, Fort Wonh District, Rowelt Creek Expanded Floodplain Inlonnation Study. it Collin Texas. 1978. The greater the diversity of species the more desirable the habitat type. Therefore, where acreage supporting a highly diversified population of biota Is replaced by a habitat supporting a less highly diversified population of biota, there is considered to be environmental degradation. The converse of a low diversity -supporting habitat Converted to a higher diversity supporting habitat creates the idea of environmental enhancement. Habitats with the greatest diversity include: forest, grasslands, fencerows, ecotones, wetlands, and water bodies, all of which are found in the floodplains of Allen. 7 U.S Amry Corps of Engineers, RoWelt Creek Expanded Flood Plain In/ommiton Stutly. Volunre Ill Environinenal Consideration Fort Worth District, September 1978, pp. El -1 -E7-86 7.6 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Vegetation Collin County lies in the Blackland Prairie vegetative zone, which encompasses the following categories, classified by geologic features: (1) deep soil prairie, (2) thin soil prairie, and (3) the limestone or clay ravine. Deep soil prairie is composed of heavy calcareous day, which originally supported tall and mid - height grasses. Thin soil prairie is underlain by Austin chalk. The dominant vegetation of the thin soil prairie includes the mid -height and short grasses and a variety of semi -desert and desert herbs. The ravine or floodplain provides the best environment for trees in the Blackland Prairie zone The shade, the concentration of runoff water, and proximity to ground water are the major factors contributing to the growth of small forests in limestone ravines. Streamside vegetation improves the environment of a floodplain. Trees and other plants reduce erosion by shielding the soil from rainfall and reinforcing the bank with their root systems Streamside vegetation provides food and a habitat for many animals. The trees' shade lowers the water temperature and helps reduce excessive algal growth. A survey of vegetation identified tree species, major stand types, and unique vegetation. Map 7.2. shows the major tree stands within the City. Table 7.2. lists the trees which are known to occur in the Rowlett creek watershed. A total of 29 tree species were found in the floodplains of Allen out of a possible 41 species occurring within the basin. In general, the tree species occurring along the creeks are greatly influenced by the soil types. The trees growing along creeks on shallow rocky soils are predominantly cedar elm, red cedar, Bois d Arc, and Shumard oak, while the trees growing in deep alluvial soils are predominantly American elm, pecan, bur oak and sycamore The most impressive woodland in Allen occurs on Rowlett Creek between McDermott Drive and Alma Drive This is the largest intact mature forest in the City, containing a high diversity of trees 100 years old or older. The grassland habitat inventory shows 135 species of plants, which is the largest number of individual plant species of the 10 habitat categories. There are relatively few trees with a large number of grasses and herb species. The fencerow and forest habitats have the second and third greatest number of plant species with the forest containing the greatest number of tree species. 7.7 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Z < O ¢ H W i i= LU W W Id I J ; i iLL 67• � i M I O r, /« i Q F � U -(—A H 7.8 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan TABLE 7 2. TREES OF ALLEN. TEXAS SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME PREFERRED HABITAT Cawa Illinoinensia "not K. Koch Pecan G. F. WL Celtis laewoma Wild. Hackberry, sugarberry G, F, WL Ulmus crassitolia Null. Cedarelm G Machias oomi(era IRC Schmid. Osage orange, Boll Qarc G, F Prunus mexicana Wats. Mexican plum G. F. WL Plums rim Scheele Hag plum G Gleditsia tracanthos L. Honey locust G,F Rhus aromatics Ad Aromatic sumac G, F $dMndus aaponaria L. Var dmmmondll Soapbelry G, WL Salix Bi9@ March. Var. nigra Black willow F, W, %n4- Populus deltoids March. Eastern cottonwood F Ju clans more L Black walnut F, WL uercus macrocaroa Mlchx Buroak F, V& Quercus shumardh Buckl. Shumard red oak F Celtis reticulate Tort. Netlea( hackberry F, WL Ulmus Americana L American elm F Cards Canadensis L. Redbud F ZaMhoxNum clava-hemulis L Pepperbark, Hercules -dub F Melia aoedarachL Chinaberry -tree F Ig decklim Wall Possum -haw F, WL Acer n"undo L. Boxelder F, WL Rhammpus Carolinians Wall. Indian -cherry F, WL Comus dmmmondil C. A. May. Rough -lead dogwood F. WL Dia nin ABibill L. Common persimmon F Fraxinus eemsvlvanica Marsh. Green ash F, WL Fraxmus Americans L. While ask F. WL Soohora ri finis T &G Eves necklace F Platens occidentalis L. Sycamore W, WL G=Grassland Biota F=Forest Blow VO -Water Body Note WL -Wetland Bout 7.9 2002-2022 Comprehensive plan G m y x a fi W LU J 0 Z J . 33 - LL F a i U 7.10 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Wildlife The presence of wildlife is dependent on the quality and quantity of suitable habitat. Of the 10 habitat categories for the Rowlett Basin, as defined by the Corps of Engineers, the water bodies, forest, grassland, fencerow, and wetlands contain the greatest number of animal species." The preservation of diverse habitats adjacent to one another is the major goal in wildlife managements Most of the stream corridors in Allen provide a diverse ecosystem consisting of water, forest, and grassland. This section describes the major wildlife habitats in Allen and lists the possible wildlife occurring within each habitat. Map 7.3. illustrates the major wildlife habitats occurring along the floodplain corridors. a. Grassland The major climax vegetation of the Rowlett Creek watershed is blackland prairie or grassland. It is very likely that the entire watershed, except for the floodplain adjacent to the creeks, was covered by native prairie, There is no known virgin prairie left in Allen.'" The most impressive grasslands within Allen occur along the western side of Rowlett Creek north and south of McDermott Drive. Other notable grasslands occur on the west side of Cottonwood Creek between the Creek and the Southern Pacific Railroad The characteristic species of the existing grassland habitat are wild -rye; little barley; little, big, and silver bluestem; Johnson grass; bur -clover; prairie -tea; snow -on -the -prairie, evening primrose, antelope -horn; phlox; bindweed; verbena; horse -nettle; asters; ragweed; brown -eyed susan; sunflowers; Indian blanket; groundsel; and sow thistle. There are few places on the open grassland within Rowlett Creek watershed that the mentioned species cannot be found. Three species of grasses have been placed on the Texas Organization for Endangered Species (TOES) watchlist: Post arachnifera (Texas bluegrass), Andr000aon aerardi (big bluestem), and Triosacum dactyloides (eastern gamagrass).11 1. Reptiles A few species of amphibians can be expected to occur in grasslands. Both the chorus frogs and toads can be expected to occur close to stock ponds or in moist areas where insect populations are high. Reptiles are much more diverse in the grasslands, with 17 species known from this habitat in Collin and Dallas Counties. One turtle species (the western box turtle), the infamous Texas homed lizard, and two poisonous snake species (the massasauga and western diamondback rattlesnake) are most noteworthy. The other four species of lizards and 10 snake species are common throughout most of Central Texas. Table 7.3. Reptiles Found in the Grasslands SCIENTFIC NAME COMMON NAME auto ounctatus Red -spotted toad Crotalus atrox western diamondback rattlesnake Oohisamus attenuatus Slender glass lizard Cnemido0homs seAlneatus Six -lined nucen nner lamorweais calliaester Prairie king"nake Lamoraoeltis aetulus Common Mingsnake Leedy. Daniel L. Robert M. Maestro, and Thomas M Franklin, Plan uma for VAIBde in Cities and Suburbs, Contract No. 14-16- 0008.20a0, Fish and 1Mldlife Service FV4S/OBS-17/66, January 1978, p 37 Robert Pourers —Sod Conservation Service, personal communication with David Morgan, January 30, 1986 Texas Organization of Endangered Species— Proposed Listing of Endangered and Threatened Plants and Animals. 7.11 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan 2. Birds Diversity of birds If high in the grassland habitat, which is to be expected where both floral and insect diversities are also high. A total of 57 species of birds are known to occur in this type of habitat within Collin and Dallas Counties. A few aquatic types (such as geese, cattle egrets, gulls, and plovers) that have adapted to prairie feeding behavior and are found in this habitat, but most species are seed eaters or feed on insects which are inhabitants of grasslands. A large number of hawks inhabit the prairie, feeding on small mammals dependent on the rich seed supply. The most characteristic birds of the grassland are: marsh hawk, red-tailed hawk, American kestrel, bobwhite, killdeer, mourning dove, roadrunner, kingbirds, scissor -tailed flycatcher, homed lark, Common crow, loggerhead shrike, meadowlarks, blackbirds, grackles, goldfinch, and various sparrows. Two species, the peregrine falcon and the whooping crane are on the Federal rare and endangered species list. These birds have not been spotted in Allen but Could stop over in the area during fall and spring migration" Table 7.4. Birds Found in the Grasslands SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Bulbulcus ibis Cattle egret Cathartes aura Turkey vulture Odragyps atraWs Black vulture booed iamaicensis Red-tailed hawk Buteo hadani Hadan's hark Buleo swainsoni Swamson's hawk Circus cvaneus Marsh hawk Falco soarverius American kestrel Colinus virdlnianus Bobwhite Charaonus vocfferous Killdeer Bartramia lonmcauda Upland plover Zenaidure maaoura Mourning dove Geococcvs califernianus Roadrunner Asb fianneus Short -eared owf Colaotes cater Red -shafted flicker Tvrannus tmannus Eastern kingbird Tvrannus verticalis Western kingbird Muscivora forficate Scissor -tailed flycatcher Eremoohila aloesids Homed lark Himndo mance Barn swallow Procne agga, Purple marlin 13 Nichols,) Hazel Baker, and Steven R. Runnels, A Field List Dallas County Birds. Where and When to Find Them, Dallas Museum of Natural History, 1974. 7.12 2002.2022 Comprehensive Plan SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Come, brechwhvnchos Common crow Mimus oalvcli Mockingbird Lamus ludowcianus Loggerhead strike Passer domesticus House sparrow Somali magna Eastern meadowlark Stumus vulgaris Starling Cassidix mexicanus Great tailed grackle Quiscalus guiscula Common grackle Molothrus ate r Brovm-headed cowbird Snore neon DICkGssel Somus maria American goldfinch Passerculus sandwlchenSla SaVanoah sparrow Ammedmmus savanna um Grasshopper spamow Pooecetes gramineus Vesper sparrow Cho o estes grammacus Lark spanow Spizelle palkde Claycoloredsparrow Si pusilla Field sparrow Melosniza lincolmi Lincoln's spanow Meloso¢a melodic Song spanow Lams argentalus Honing gull Lanus delawarensis Ring -billed gull' Lacus giil Franldinb gull Anelaius hoeniceus RetlMiiged black iM 7.13 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan 3. Mammals The mammals which occur in the grasslands are dominated by rodents with 10 species of mice and rats and two species of rabbits. The only large mammals occurring in the prairie are the coyote and eastern spotted skunk None of the mammals are rare or endangered. Table 7.5. Mammals Found in the Grasslands SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Canis latrans Coyote Peronn"ws mankulalus Deer mouse atAlaaus fllondanus Eastern cottontail Slamonodan hisoitlus Hispid cotton rat PALyUga novemdnctus Nine-bande armadillo Soilooale outonus Eastern spotted skunk Soermaohilus tridecemiineatus Thirteen -lined squire) R41111 rvemws Nm yrel Lexus celitomicus I Celiromia laduabbit b. Forest Land The forestland rivals the prairie in diversity, but covers a much smaller area. The majority of the trees in the city are located adjacent to creeks or in the floodplains. The remainder of the trees occur in molts and planted clusters, resulting primarily from human action. In all probability, nutrients and organic matter are more abundant in the floodplain soils, while the increased moisture of the floodplain can sustain tree growth in this region. The degraded calcareous soils and carbonate rock do not retain water well and thus limit tree growth at higher elevations. Plant diversity Is relatively high, dominated by trees and few grasses. In terms of plant life, the forest land category is really distinctive. There appears to be no rare or endangered plants in this habitat in the region. 1. Reptiles Amphibians are more common in the forest than on the prairie, primarily because the trees are never far from water. Nine amphibian species have been observed in this habitat. The largest number of reptiles from any of the land cover categories can be found in the forest At least 31 species of reptiles, including one turtle, nine lizards, and 21 snakes, are included in the forest. Four poisonous snake species are included; more than were found in the grassland. Numerous ecological niches and the existence of rocky crevices within the Floodplain terraces foster the abundance of reptiles. 7.14 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Table 7.6. Reptiles Found in the Forestlands SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Ambvstoma texanum Small -mouthed salamander Tanagers Carolina Eastern box turde Ennlecasr85glAIM Five -lined skink Lyggsomalaterale Ground skink Netrgtlgn2aty.minos Eastern hognuse snake Ooheatlm aeshvus Rough green snake Diatloohis ounctatus Ringneek snake Agkistrodon contgnrix Copperhead 0 hisaurus adenuatus Slender glass lizard Cnemi Wuhan s seAneatus Six -lined racemnner Lama roneltla calhga-star Prairie kingsnake Lanmrooeltis getulus Common kiigsnake 2. Birds Bird diversity is also very high, providing niches for 60 species. All but nine species are considered perching birds, which is to be expected where resting areas are composed of trees rather than bare ground of the prairie Nearly 30 percent of this high diversity are made up of vireos and warblers, most of which migrate through the trees in search of insects. The only game birds preferring the forests are the wood duck, and woodcock, both relatively uncommon Finches or sparrows are relatively uncommon, also. It is likely that the majority of the listed 60 species of birds can be observed here during migration. Table 7.7. Birds Found in the Forestlands SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Buceohala claroule Common goldeneye Buceohala albeola BuMehead Regulus calendula Ruby -crowned kinglet ACccioiter Stratus Sharp-shinnxi hawk Accioger coaoeni CooWs hawk Philohela minor American woodcock Otus asio Screech M Buboviminianus Great homed osN rix varia Bared owl Asio ohs Long-eared owl Caorimulms caroinesis Chuck -will's -widow Chonleiles tumor Common nighthawk Centums carolinus Redlbellied woodpecker Melaneoas eMhroceohalus Red -bladed woolpeaer Sohvraoiws vanus yellovr-bellied sapsucker Dendroc000s vdlgsus Rairywoodpecker 7.15 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMONNAME Dendromoos oubescens Dawny woodpecker Savomis phoebe Eastern phoebe Contopus wens Eastern wood pewee Cvnuutte crania Blue Jay Parus carolinensis Carolina chickadee Parus bicolor Tufted titmouse Certhia familiaris Brown creeper Thrvnomanes be nckii BeWi 's wren Thrvothorus ludowuanus Carolina viten Toxostoma Mum Brown threasher Turdus mloretonus Robin Hvlmichla outtata Hemkt thrush Hvlmhi&la ustulata Swainson's thrush sudia slalis Eastern bluebird Poliootila naerula Blue -gray gnalcatcher Regulus sabapa Goldencromed kinglet Vireo anseus Whne-eyed vireo Vireo solitanus Solitary vireo Vireo olivaceus Red -eyed vireo Miniotilta vara Black -and -white warbler Dendroice petechia Yellow warbler Dendroica wens Black -throated green warbler Setophaga ruticlla Amencan redstart Puanga rubra Summar tanager Richmandena carcinalis Cardinal Pheucims ludovicanus Rose -breasted grosbeak Linarta cros Painted burling Passerella Mace Fox sparrow Melospiza Georgians Svampspanm 3. Mammals A relatively large number of mammals inhabit the forest. Bats appear, both because of trees for resting and for dens. Larger mammals are more common here than in any other part of the watershed and include opossum, raccoon, mink, two species of skunk, red and grey fox, coyote, bobcat, fox squirrel, and armadillo. 7.16 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Table 7.8. Mammals Found In the Forestlands SCIE"FIC NAME COMMONNAME Eotesicus fuscus Big brawn bat Lasmrus borealis Red ball Meohitis medrda Striped skunk L irL� Bobcat Glaucdmvs urians Eastern flying squirrel Canis latrans Coyote Peromvscus maniculatus Deermouse Svlviladus Alontlanus Eastern cottontail Sidmonodon hisoitlu. Hispid caftan rat Das us novemcindus Nme-banded armadillo Soilodale oumnus Eastern spotted skunk Didelehl3 wrainiana Ovessum Procyon Idler Raccoon Wetlands Wetlands include marshes and permanently damp areas where distinctive vegetation may occur A distinction has been made In listing biota for water bodies and wetlands, assuming that characteristic water bodies' biota actually live In the water most of the time. Typical wetlands, such as low flat floodplains, are extremely important habitats, both for wildlife and for producing nutrients, which nourish water bodies. 1. Amphibians/Reptiles As might be expected, amphibian diversity is high, with at least 16 species suspected to occur in local wetlands. The list includes four species of salamanders, five small frogs, three toads, two frogs, and two species of narrow -mouthed toads. Reptiles are relatively diverse, with 22 species. It is significant that all but one species (a moisture -loving skink) are snakes. Insects are rare and most lizards prefer dryer habitats. Five species of the snakes are poisonous, the largest number for any of the land use categories. Table 7.9. Reptiles Found in the Wetlands SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Ambvstoma lexanum Small-moutred salamander auto oundatus Red -spotted load Ambvstoma tlonnum Tiger salamander Hyla dnerea Green treehog Rana catesbeiana Bullfrog Rana oioiens Leopard hog Maddens dunclatus Ringneck snake Aokishotlon contends Coppemead Lamorooelfis eetulus Common kingsnake Nalnx rhombilem Diamond -backed water snake 717 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan 2. Birds Relatively few bird species, compared to other habitats, seem to prefer wetlands. Almost all of the species are semi aquatic species (28) feeding in or near water. Only six species do not actually wade or enter the water, and these six are never found far from the water's edge Table 7.10. Birds Found in the Wetlands SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Melospaa Georgians Swamp sparrow Lanae amentetus Herring gull Larus delawarensis Ring -billed! gull' Larus oioxcan Franklins gull Anelaius hceniceus Redlwinged blackbird Ardea herodias Great blue heron Florida caerulea Little blue heron Leucaohon Mule Snowy egret Fulice aermicana American coot Menacend alcvon Belled kingfisher Btdorides veriescens Green heron Actite, macularia Spotted sandpiper Trina solitana Solitary sandpiper Totanus melanocleucus Grealer yellows! Ereunetes ousillus Semipalmated santlpiper 3. Mammals Only ten species of mammals might inhabit the wetlands for any length of time. All except the cotton rat are relatively large and, with two exceptions, range in and out of the wetlands. The exceptions are nutria and beaver, both of which also inhabit water bodies. The other eight species range into forests and grasslands. Table 7.11. Mammals Found in the Wetlands SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Slamonodon hisoidus Hispid cotton rat Dasvpus novemcinclus Nine -banded armadillo Spiloaale outorius Eastern spotted skunk Didelphis virwreana Opossum Procvan lotor Raccoon d. Water Bodies As a habitat, water bodies are a sort of catchall for any place containing water such as lakes, ponds, and creeks. The attached list contains numerous plants and animals that live in water, but it should be realized that they all do not live in all water bodies. Water bodies in the Rowlett Creek watershed include stock ponds and creeks that Flow into Lake Ray Hubbard. 7.18 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Fish Although large number of fish, 59 species, are known to occur in this part of the drainage of the Trinity River. 3 Only a few species will be found in the small streams and stock ponds in Allen. The larger fish, such as gar, carp, bass, warmouth, drum, and channel catfish, could easily range into the upper end of Lake Ray Hubbard in the southern end of the watershed and some of these may occur in deep pools of the creeks or in local farm ponds The large number of species of shiners (11) could occur In some of the creeks, and several species were observed during the inspection. The seventeen fish species most likely to occur within Allen, include: threadfin shad, carp, goldfish, golden shiner, red fn shiner, bullhead and fathead minnows, stoneroller, bullhead catfish, tadpole madtom, mosquitofish, largemouth bass, green sunfish, bluegill longear sunfish, and dusky and bluntnose darters. Table 7.12. Fish Found in the Waterbodies SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Doirosom peterense Thmadfin shad tlnus lamlo Carp Cyronnus auratus Goldfish Noteminonus crvsoleucas Golder,.hirer Notes uIrensis Red shinerll Pimeohales viallax Bullhead minnow Pimeohales oromelas Fathead minnow Camoostoma anamalum Stoneroller Pvlodictus olivaris Flathead catfish Notorus avrinus Tadpole madtom Garnihma affinis Mosquitofish Microoterus salmoides Largemouth bass L000mis cvanellus Green sunfish LOOamis macraWiius Bluegill Lioomis meaalods Longear sunfish Perdne sclera Dusky darter Etheostoma chloorsomum Blunlnose defter 2. Reptiles The largest concentrations of amphibians are to be expected in water bodies. At least twelve species are reported from this area, including four salamanders, five tree or chorus frogs, one toad, and two frogs None of these are extremely common, except the leopard and bull frogs. Sixteen reptile species can be listed as inhabitants of water bodies of the watershed, and is dominated by eleven turtle species. The five snake species are listed as water snakes, including the poisonous cottonmouth. The majority of the reptiles are fairly common, except for the mud, musk, and softshell turtles 13 Hubbs, C.L., A Checklist of Texas Freshwater Fishes frevisecO. Texas Parks n Wildiffe DebaMent.Austin Texas, Technical series No. 11 1976 7.19 2002-2022 COnlp/ehensIve Plan Table 7.13. Reptiles Found In the Waterbodies SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Ambystoma texanum Small -mouthed s llamantler Ambvstoma tlarnum Tiger salamander Hyla cinerea Green treefrog Rana catesbeiana But" Rana oioiens Leopard frog Uchelvrba serpentine Common snapping urge Chnsemvs scrota Red -eared slider Adusbcdun oisdvoms Cottonmouth Natrix Mombifera DiamorM-backetl eater snake 3. Birds The birds associated with water bodies are most often seen during migration but on rare occasions white pelicans may drift in from the coast. Most of the twenty-five aquatic species are ducks, and grebes, with the remainder being wading birds or gulls and terns. Table 7.14. Birds Found in the Waterbodies SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Larus amentatus Hering gull 1 -anis delsenuensis Ring -billed gull' Larus oicxcan Franklin's gull Patlilvmbus octlicece Pied -billed! grebe Anas olanrhvnchos Mallard Anas camlicensis Green-wrigec teal Area discos Blue�winged teal Scatula dvceata Shoveler Aythya Americana Redhead ANhya vahl inere Canvasback Avlhvaaffinis lesser scaup Sterna albifions Least tem Chlidonias ner Black tem Ardea herodim Great blue heron Florida caemleaLille due heron Leumohovxthula Snovryegret Fulda aertnicana American coot Meaacenl alcvon Belted kingfisher 4 Mammals Only two local mammal species, the beaver and nutria, can be termed aquatic and both are considered uncommon due to lack of permanent flowing water. 7.20 2002.2022 Comprehensive Plan Pollution Prevention The National Pollution Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES) is part of the implementation of the Clean Water Act designed to control stonnwater run-off from non -point sources. Phase II of the program requires the operators of small (over 50,000 population in an urbanized area) municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4) discharging into the waters of the United States to secure permits not later than March 10, 2003. As a member of the NCTCOG, Allen is obligated to collaborate in securing regional approvals Permits are issued by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and require the development of a plan that includes a minimum of six control measures: a. Public education and outreach: includes pollution prevention education including cooperative efforts targeting schools and businesses b. Public involvementtparticipation: includes community participation in the development and implementation of programs such as recycling and neighborhood clean-up. c. Illicit discharge detection and elimination: control of illegal dumping or direct connections to the storm sewer through enforcement of local ordinances. d. Construction site runoff controls, including Best Management Practices (BMP) for construction sites 1-5 acres in size, plan review and enforcement of local ordinances. e. Post -construction runoff controls, including BMP and enforcement I. Pollution prevention in municipal systems requires efforts to reducepesticides and herbicides and the adverse effects on storm water runoff resulting from municipal operations, such as excess sediment run-off. The City must establish baseline data and identify measurable goals to reduce pollution. Currently the City has existing programs for street sweeping, recycling, composting of yard waste, litter removal, household hazardous waste removal, removal of debris from waterways, and storm sewer maintenance The City has also made investments in repair of curbs, gutters and stone sewers, drainage improvements, stream bank stabilization and erosion control. It is anticipated that enhancement of many of these programs may be required to meet the goals established through the public involvement process. Individual programs are detailed in Community Facilities and Services. Priorities and Implementation Strategies Priority. Preservation of natural resources and ecological habitat. Implementation Strategies I Continue to encourage preservation of mature trees and wooded areas. ii. Provide for reforestation of urbanizing areas. iii. Maintain habitat in forested and riparian areas. V. Maintain creeks in their natural state. V. Prohibit reclamation of Floodplain. Priority. Counteract the adverse effects of urbanization through construction regulations and floodplain management. Implementation Strategies Continue to require on-site detention and erosion control for new development as necessary and use BMP to prevent pollution from entering waterways. Continue to require dedication of the fully urbanized 100 -year floodplain to minimize flood damage and assure maintenance. Priority. Meet or exceed the requirements for pollution prevention activities. Implementation Strategies: Establish baseline data and measurable objectives. Enhance or expand existing programs to meet objectives. 7.21 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan URBAN DESIGN 8. URBAN DESIGN Streetscape Image For several years, the City of Allen has been caught in the enormous northward expansion of that urban zone known as the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex This rapid expansion of residential and commercial development has imposed increasing demand on existing thoroughfares As a result, the City has assumed a "response mode" in an effort to accommodate vehicular trips generated by limited access subdivisions and large-scale retail/office development. Consequently, the thoroughfare plan (meaning the placement of different size thoroughfares/collectors within the city) has been shaped by development rather than development being shaped by the streets. This contemporary condition has physically overwhelmed the historic relationship of downtown Allen to adjacent (and serving) streets. Most of these early streets existed close to the railroad and within the cell of the agricultural grid that generically covers Collin County. The old rural grid became the framework of new development and dominated the former central importance of downtown Allen. As large-scale development in -filled that grid, it forced once black top/gravel/dirt roads to become 4 and 6 lane thoroughfares. As this happened, the central importance of downtown was diminished In addition, the power of US 75 to attract development along its right- of-way only further contributed to the disconnection between downtown and the thoroughfare system that comprises Allen. Development driven street classification has resulted in a thoroughfare plan that has a comprehensible grid form in plan but will be confusing to experience. If streets are only distinguished by type, the result will be a street image that has no clear legibility or sense of particular association with the City of Allen. To establish this needed legibility and sense of place, the streetscape components, which define the street system, must be distinguished by a thematic street character that facilitates recognition of one's location relative to their desired destinations in Allen. Visual "way markers" must be established so that one's sense of position relative to a known point is understood. Portals and gateways must be set in place so that one's entrance into and exit from important areastdistricts are visible. To create a framework of streetscapes that achieves these attributes of legibility, there must be a coherent forth implied by the street structure. Such a structure can be based on one of several approaches: • Street Type • North/South vs. East/West Streets • Street Approaches to an Important Destination A streetscape plan based on identification of street types would only visually amplify the forces that have weakened Allen's sense of center. Street type means Arterial, Principal Collectors, Modified Collectors, etc. Recognition of these distinctions in the streetscape framework would translate the thoroughfare plan into a vertical expression. In so doing the development determents that have generated this plan would now be exerting a form giving influence over one's street experience A Streetscape Plan based on recognition of streets by expressing their cardinal orientation would amplify the linkages between Allen and its surrounding communities over a clear expression of Allen itself. Recognition of the major north/south, east/west streets means recognition of the old agricultural grid that is part of an expansive pattern spreading far beyond the City limits. Recognition of the cardinal orientation of streets as a framework for the streetscape plan means that street identity terminates at an invisible city limit along streets that visually extend into neighboring communities and counties. A Streetscape Plan based on street approaches to important destinations is inherently responsive to indigenous attributes of the community because it structurally recognizes those attributes. The destination -based framework is historically responsive to traditional centers of a town. The destination -based framework promotes a more resident friendly city because it establishes a center and implies a gradient of density that preserves zones for residential use. The destination - 81 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan based framework has a greater legibility because it not only identifies the street but one's position on that street relative to a known point (the destination). The streetscape should be is one based on street approaches to known destinations. The destination ultimately recognized by the street system is the Historic, Civic, and Cultural core of the City of Allen. Such a framework of street improvements will achieve the earlier described attributes of legibility and in so doing create a clear sense of place. An approach and destination based framework will resolve the cognitive confusion of street types generated by earlier development decisions and ultimately bring both the US 75 corridor and the future DART Light Rail Transit (LRT) into a meaningful association with the heart of Allen itself Despite the dramatic changes Allen has experienced in recent years, there is still a significant quantity of undeveloped/ underdeveloped land and opportunity to impact the street system. Proper design of a thematic streetscape can create cognitive clarity to street organization as well as mitigate the tendency of existing development patterns to weaken the importance of Allen's downtown core. Inventory of Existing Street Conditions Implementation of a streetscape framework must harmonize existing street conditions with the overall system implied by that framework Street elements inventoried included • Curb -to -Curb dimension • Street materials • Street light type • Plant types • Presence of sidewalk • Drainage system • Presence of medians • Edge definition • Number of lanes Thirteen street types suggest a pattern shown on Map 8.1. The 13 street types are: • Country Highway — These are 2 -lane to 4 -lane black top roads with paved shoulders, bar ditches, agricultural fences, randomly placed street lights (very sparse), surrounded by open fields and wooded areas. The feeling is agricultural and the context is one of a small road in a spacious setting. • Country Lane— These are 2 -lane blacktop roads with no shoulder but they have bar ditches and randomly placed streetlights (very sparse). These roads are surrounded by open fields and wooded areas. The feeling is that of a black top county road. • Old Agricultural Grid Road — These are gravel top 2 -lane roadways, crossing open fields. There are no streetlights or fronting development. There are some older homes, old agricultural fence and weathered wood fence. • Corporate Drive — These are newer 4 -lane concrete roads with a winding geometry that is clearly intended for a corporate address. There is a thematic street appearance in place. • Major Civic Thoroughfare —These are 6 -lane divided concrete streets that connect major destinations and traverse multiple land uses They are punctuated by major project 8.2 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan entries and significant retail centers There is evidence of civic interest in these streets because of previous landscape and lighting improvements with thematic character. • Conventional Thoroughfare —These are 6 -lane divided concrete streets with uniform appearances that lack specific identity or landmark characteristics They generally utilize lighting such as "cobra head" fixture on galvanized standards. They traverse multiple land uses and connect other thoroughfares and are punctuated by major project entries as well as important retail centers. The general feeling of these streets is that they are extensions of streets, which originate outside Allen and undergo no change in recognition of Allen itself. • Thoroughfare Collector — These are major concrete streets with up to 6 -lanes that serve primarily residential zones. These are older, built -out residential areas where the street has been walled in, thus creating a feeling of separation from the fabric of the community. The walls are comprised of multiple materials, with some wood fence, some thin wall, and some full masonry wall. The older wood fences are often leaning The message of the streetscape is stay out, not come in. These streets connect nonresidential zones through residential zones. • Major Thoroughfare — These are 6 -lane concrete streets that connect destinations of importance, traverse multiple uses, and are lined with "utility clutter." The feeling of these streets is that they are older versions of the conventional thoroughfare (described above). They look like older highways that have been encroached upon by growth of the town they traverse. • Improved Collector— These are newer "theme" collectors with 4lanes of concrete street divided by a median. There is a uniform appearance to the street lighting. These streets are often lined with thin wall and are punctuated by project entry monuments. The feeling is that of a newer residential street traversing newer residential areas. The utilities are buried and the sidewalks meander rather than run straight. • Residential Collector — These are 4 -lane divided concrete streets with many homes siding and some homes fronting. There is no consistent street lighting This is an older area with wood fences and a general mixture of street definitions, but all residential They differ from the thoroughfare collector in that they are smaller in width and therefore more residential in feel. • Parkway —These streets have a winding geometry with heavy landscape/ tree cover They are flanked by undeveloped land and have a thematic streetscape. These streets primarily connect public uses. • 2 -Lane Residential Collector— This is a concrete street traversing generally older residential areas. Many of the street definitions are older and are characterized by deteriorating wood fences. There is some newer development mixed in. 8.3 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Map 8 1. Existing Street Hierarchy AW- �'" tAJ-7-` An important vertical movement can be distinguished, primanly in the eastlwest streets Most of the creekways in Allen run from north to south and create low points for streets that travel east to west. This creates a unique rhythm of movement which should be recognized in the ultimate streetscape plan. Parts of Allen farthest away from its Old Town Core" had a definite low density and open feel. The streets here are ones identified as country highway, country lane, old agricultural grid, 24ane residential collector, and conventional thoroughfare. As one approaches the core area, there is a clear intensification of nonresidential activity. Most of the City's major commercial, civic, and cultural activities fall within a zone bounded generally by civic thoroughfares, major thoroughfares, and a corporate drive. This generally recognizable form reinforces the concept of "Street Approaches to an Important Destination." Concept Analysis of existing land uses illustrates that most of Allen's commercial, civic and culture[ uses are located in a zone generally bounded by Exchange Parkway, Greenville Avenue, Bethany Drive, and a corporate drive that extends from Bethany to Exchange through Millennium Park. This perimeter defines a core zone within which the historic Central Business District is centered. Reinforcement of this existing constellation of land uses by articulation of the boundary containing them creates a clear district that can be called the Core Zone and a clear subdistrict that can be called the Central Business District. 8.4 7 nz AW- �'" tAJ-7-` An important vertical movement can be distinguished, primanly in the eastlwest streets Most of the creekways in Allen run from north to south and create low points for streets that travel east to west. This creates a unique rhythm of movement which should be recognized in the ultimate streetscape plan. Parts of Allen farthest away from its Old Town Core" had a definite low density and open feel. The streets here are ones identified as country highway, country lane, old agricultural grid, 24ane residential collector, and conventional thoroughfare. As one approaches the core area, there is a clear intensification of nonresidential activity. Most of the City's major commercial, civic, and cultural activities fall within a zone bounded generally by civic thoroughfares, major thoroughfares, and a corporate drive. This generally recognizable form reinforces the concept of "Street Approaches to an Important Destination." Concept Analysis of existing land uses illustrates that most of Allen's commercial, civic and culture[ uses are located in a zone generally bounded by Exchange Parkway, Greenville Avenue, Bethany Drive, and a corporate drive that extends from Bethany to Exchange through Millennium Park. This perimeter defines a core zone within which the historic Central Business District is centered. Reinforcement of this existing constellation of land uses by articulation of the boundary containing them creates a clear district that can be called the Core Zone and a clear subdistrict that can be called the Central Business District. 8.4 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan By contrast, the generally undeveloped areas located along the north, east and west edges of Allen comprise a comprehensible district that is non -urban, open, and more pastoral in its appearance. Reinforcement of this appearance by formulation of streetscapes and development standards that preserve these visual qualities only strengthens and amplifies the functional/visual/cognitive importance of the core area. Between the core area and the open edge is a zone that is largely filled in with medium density residential uses This establishes a logical transition from center to edge, which is recognizable in most historic cities and towns. Therefore, visual reinforcement of the sense of connection and gradient implied by the development/land use pattern will complete the quality of townscape by establishing both the sense of movement to the core and movement away from the core. The result of these conditions is a syntax of visual impressions that is comprehensible, legible, and sequential. These visual impressions are separated into clear cognitive zones. These zones are' • Central Business District Zone —This zone includes the historic downtown, the proposed cultural center, and the historic village. Because it is bounded on one side by McDermott Drive, it includes the City Municipal Center. • Central Business District Core Zone — This zone contains a majority of the city's commercial, office, and medical uses This zone is the hub of commercial life in Allen and is therefore identified as the core zone • The approach zone —This is the zone that exists between outer edges and core. East of I -H 75, it is mostly built out with older residential uses. This zone includes McDermott, as well as portions of Bethany and Exchange (east of Greenville) In addition, it includes Allen Heights (between Exchange and Bethany). West of US 75 it is substantially built out with newer residential subdivisions. This sector includes McDermott, a portion of proposed Exchange and a portion of proposed Bethany (west of the corporate drive) as well as Alma. • The Outer Zone— This is the zone of predominantly undeveloped land and unimproved streets. This zone still retains the rural openness that once characterized the Allen Township. This zone includes such streets as Stacy Road and FM 2551, as well as portions of Bethany and Exchange east of Allen Heights. It also includes Custer and the proposed Ridgeview. The streets that connect edge to core are important "image streets" that convey a sequence of approach as one moves from edge to center. To make the street experience comprehensible, the streetscape must clearly identify each of the four zones. To make the street experience legible, the streetscape must imply the relationship between the four zones. To make the street experience sequential, the streetscape must convey a sense of progression and anticipation of approach. Comprehensible: The four zones (CBD, core, approach, and outer zones) should have a streetscape that is typical of each particular area. For example, in the outer zone this streetscape is not so much characterized by the presence of streetscape features, but by the absence of such urbanized additions to the street experience. The streetlights can be higher. The landscaping can be more natural in its arrangement (clustered in drifts rather than aligned in rigid rows). Building set -back (or the perception of setback) should be greater and the use of walls to define developments should be greatly limited, with landscaping and berms performing that function. In the transition zone, residential walls become more common, streetlights become more stylized and closely placed, and landscaping is more uniformly spaced. In the core zone, the stylized streetlights are enhanced with banners and bases, landscaping is again more closely spaced and accented with color (ornamentals), and intersections of the core loop are identified by gateways that signify entrance. In the CBD zone, streetlights and paving patterns become more pedestrian oriented and trees become more powerfully arranged in an alley pattern. In addition, pedestrian 8.5 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan entry portals that make a physical connection to municipal and cultural functions identify comers of this zone. Legible: The characteristic streetscape of the four zones should be comprised of a "palette" of street features that are common to all zones but occur in different levels of spacing or enhancement. In this way one understands that the street experience is an extension and continuation of the preceding experience. For example, the stylized street light characteristic of the approach zone becomes an enhanced stylized streetlight in the core zone. It is the same street standard and fixture, but handled in a different way. Sequence: The visual impression of sequence is implied by degree, intensity, and magnitude Therefore, the sequence of movement from edge to core is conveyed by closer and more organized spacing of landscape enhancements and identity features. A closer spacing of light standards as well as greater scale and more rigid definition of the street corridor also convey sequence. In addition, the introduction of color in landscape and then color in streetscape fixtures gives an added dynamic. Using this conceptual approach, a single street such as McDermott can have a unified but changing street experience that communicates the transition from one zone to another. In this way, clear and organized structure for Allen emerges. This is a structure that rationalizes the inherent confusion of thoroughfare distribution and creates a logical framework that reinforces identification of a center for Allen. The Outer Zone The Outer Zone is that area generally on the outskirts of the City that includes a number of parcels that are yet to be developed and retain their rural characteristics The image is one of wide parkways, rural pastoral roads, and agrarian farmland with low density residential development. The Outer Zone creates a significant buffer area of seemingly undeveloped landscape between the developed areas of the City of Allen and its civic neighbors, namely the cities of McKinney, Fairview, Lucas, Parker, Plano, and Frisco. Left unchecked as Allen continues to build toward the outskirts of town, the streets of the Outer Zone of Allen could simply blend with neighboring municipalities into a seamless sprawl of suburban obscurity. These country roads are remnants of Allen's roots in a rich agricultural heritage. It is essential for the City of Allen to retain its civic identity as a semi -rural community and preserve the visual asset and naturally existing buffer of its rural streetscapes. The Outer Zone (See Map 8.2) is primarily comprised of streets and Map 8 2 The boulevards serving residential land outer Zone uses near the outer reaches of the city limits of the City of Allen Working within the streetscape '{ master plan, these areas serve to- _ create a "(na impression" to city ., - visitors The city limits should be celebrated to announce the entrance - into the City of Allen and aid in - t1 orientation. Most importantly, the and intersection streetstreatments -_ treatments of the outer zone introduce a framework of elements �••, that are utilized in building a hierarchy - ,� , of identity as the image streets approach the CBD Core Zone. The intent of the landscape 00 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan design is to preserve the open country" atmosphere of the pre -development landscape through the Implementation of wide landscape and trail easements and naturalized landscape plantings. This will afford residents an enhanced feel of "life in the country" that Allen is known for, and not allow streets to simply fade into another suburb of Dallas. Gateways The crossing of image streets at the city limits shall be marked with an enhanced street signage program. The outer zone as a whole strives to retain its rural characteristics. Transitional signage creates a subtle gateway at major thoroughfares that clearly marks entrance to the City of Allen. The city logo shall be utilized in the signage design and the form, materials, and graphics of the piece shall echo those of other civic enhancements. The intent is one of greeting that directs one toward downtown. There Is an Important distinction between these intersections for entry into the City of Allen and the intersections listed in the next section. Highway 121 is an important edge for the City, but to line the street (along which only the south side is in the city limits) with six highly enhanced intersections would begin to lessen the impact and function of the intent of these guidelines. The intersection of Highway 121 at Watters is designated as the ceremonial entry because of its function as an approach zone and its use as a direct and efficient route to the Core Zone. • This signage upgrade shall take place where an outer zone street crosses the city limits Intersections Intersections in the Outer Zone introduce visitors to the basic elements of the Allen streetscape framework. Intersections in the Outer Zone set up a e vocabulary of basic design CONCRETE LANDSCAPE elements that is enhanced ,�' EDGE(t•A' WIDTH) through additive design skj y • CHINESE PISTACHIO upgrades as one (FEIdALE) - ii- u approaches the CBD Core _ NEiGISOR The design is simple but cm TURF yields a celebratory - definition to the intersection, -------_- _ claiming it as part of an -OUTER ...' Image Street and therefore LONE on the path to the CBD Core. A 130' radius y:'6gT landscape setback should Figure 8.1 be observed from the 0 outer zone center of the intersection to intersection accommodate the Outer Zone intersection design. Crosswalks should be 17'- O'wide with a Z -O" scoring pattern grid. Crosswalk should remain natural concrete color with a 1'- 6' wide stained concrete band to either side of the crosswalk. The bands should be entirely sandblasted and sawcut at an interval of 3 linear feet to be stained a consistent color throughout the city Outer Zone Parkway Streetscape The Outer Zone Streets welcome visitors with a recollection of the rural characteristics of the City of Allen and strives to preserve the spirit of the city prior to development by preserving an open streetscape and wide parkway. The streetscape planting is random in nature with drifts of trees crossing through the rightof-way and a wide landscape setback. [� Figure 8 Outer Zone Imersemio" 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan - SEE SCREENING SECTION FOR REQUIRED PARKING LANDSCAPE BERMS LOT SCREENING MEANDERING SIDEWALK gig - A o - --------------- agg ---------- ORNAMENTAL TREES\\ TREES IN NATURALIZED DRIFTS. FRAGMENTATEDGES OF REQUIRED OPENINGS IN TREE CANOPY DRIFT. PLANTINGS - SEE GUIDELINES OR DIMENSIONS. Rgure 32 �\ SEE SCREENING SECTION FOR Outer Zone REQUIRED RESIDENTIAL AND Parkway OTHER DEVELOPMENT SCREENING OPTIONS - INCLUDING FENCES AND GREEN SCREEN Existing lighting at intersections is to be preserved. If light fixtures are to be replaced due to wear, they should match the existing "cobra head" fixtures so as to retain the rural character of the outer zone. Figure 8 3 Outer Zone Landscape Existing traffic signal lights should be preserved. If signals are to be replaced due to wear, they should match the existing signal fixtures, if available The recommended landscaping should Include a single now of canopy trees encircling the intersection at a 125'-0" radius from the center of the intersection. Canopy trees should be planted 25'-0" on center and be one of the following species: Chinese Pistachio (Female) (Pistachio chinensis) Bald Cypress (Taxodium distichum) American Sweet Gum (Liquidamber Styracigua) Lacebark/ Drake Elm (Ulmus parvifolia) Trees shall be contained in a mulched bed bordered by a one -foot wide concrete band. Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon) should be established in all areas not covered with paving, shrub, or groundcover. All landscape areas should be irrigated by an automatic system to include tree - bubblers for all canopy and ornamental trees. The landscape setback zone from the right-of-way on either side of designated should be 25 -foot New development of unimproved property and redevelopment of existing properties shall 8.8 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan conform to this setback and landscape guidelines set forth in this section Structures and surface parking will not be allowed within this 25 -foot setback zone Sidewalks should be a minimum of 5'-D" and should meander on tangent arcs at 150' to 250' radii through beans. Just as the creek and trail crossings have enhanced landscape plantings to celebrate the low points of natural topography occurring through the urban fabric, so shall the high points or hilltops along image streets When visitors arrive at a crest they are presented with a long view out ahead and across the city. This naturally rolling topography along east -west streets is unique to the City of Allen and adds a layer of interest to the streetscape experience The recommended median enhancements are • Ascending Banner Po/es — Along the centerline of the median at a high point along the road, five ascending banner poles shall be placed at 25'-0" on center. The heights shall rise in five-foot intervals to top out with an existing light pole in the median. Poles should match cross section and color of existing light poles to achieve uniformity • Banners— Seasonal banners should commemorate civic events or holidays. Banners shall be hung on all four sides of the pole and taper from top to bottom, effectively creating a three dimensional form. • Masonry Pedestal —A masonry pedestal should be constructed at the base of the steel light and banner poles to match other civic identity elements and step in two tiers. • Median Nosings—The ends of all medians should be paved with colored and textured concrete with consistent color and Medians should be bermed with groupings of four ornamental trees planted 50'-0" on center along the centerline of the median where the cross dimension is greater than 23'-0". Where the dimension is less than the required distance, the grouping shall be downsized in quantity to fit the given space. If the cross dimension is less than 8'-0", no ornamental trees should be required. Ornamental trees should be planted 10'-0" on center and contained within a mulched planting bed with green steel edging. White Crape Myrtles (Lagerstroemia indica) are recommended. Parkway canopy trees should be dispersed in naturalized drifts in landscape dedications or easements on both sides of street. DrHte are to be naturalized in form and a minimum size of 150 feet long and of varying widths, spreading into the right of way and through the landscape setback. Gaps in drifts should be 100-150 feet in length, randomly placed at a staggered offset wherever possible. The recommended mix of species is as follows: • 20% Live Oak Quercus virginiana • 20% Red Oak Quercus shumardii • 20% Cedar Elm Ulmus crassifolia • 40% Bun Oak Quercus Macrocarpa Ornamental trees should be placed at the outer edges of canopy tree drifts as if occurring naturally along the edge of a wooded area, maintaining a 2 5:1 ornamental to canopy ratio relationship. 50% should be evergreen and selected from the following: • Oklahoma Red Bud Cercis canadensis "Oklahoma" • Yaupon Holly Ilex vomitoria • Crape Myrtle Lagerstroemia indica • Eastern Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana In order to preserve and celebrate the natural topography of the City of Allen and to increase the public awareness of natural features in the city, sites adjacent to creeks, trails, and bridge/culvert crossings are to be specially enhanced with masonry identity markers and riparian tree plantings on either side of bridges, creeks, or trail crossings, planted in naturalized groves. The following Species are recommended • Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum • Chinquapin Oak Quercus muhlengbergii 00 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan . Pecan Carya illinoiensis Masonry Identity and Signage - In conjunction with the Consolidated Alternative Transportation/Recreational Trails Plan, trails and creeks that cross Image Streets shall be marked with a masonry marker Materials shall echo those of the CBD Core identity features. Signage shall show the name of the creek and /or trail as appropriate for that location. Metal signage shall be legible from vehicular traffic and supported from ascending masonry plinths. Sites for development should be cross-checked with the Plan and the city's Parks & Recreation Department to ensure compliance with required trail development. LOWLAND - LOWLAND Figure 8.4. TREE TREE Riparian and SPECIES BRIDGE A CREEK/ SPECIES Trail Zone TRAIL MARKER RIPARIAN ZONE & TRAIL CROSSING The Approach Zone The Approach Zone guidelines create 'j an identity for the image streets of suburban Allen that is distinctly ti- separate from its civic neighbors and -� from the Outer Zone. The design further organizes standard streetscape elements into an order that reinforces the fact that a visitor is approaching the downtown area of the city. This organization signifies to the visitor a location in the city relative to the CBD. As elements increase in stature, density, and order, the proximity to downtown becomes closer. Residential and commercial developments gain from such an identity streetscape design as designating a property "near' the core, but not "in the country." 8.10 The Approach Zone is a transitional area between the Outer Zone and the Map 83. The -)V Core Zone and is comprised of Approach Zone primarily residential land uses, though • / pockets of retail and other mixed use developments do occur. Although the - fors of this zone are typically .. /" suburban in nature, the goal is to I, elevate the streetscape of these • • streets to serve as an aid in wayfnding through the city and direct visitors toward the Core Zone. (See i Map 8.3) The Approach Zone guidelines create 'j an identity for the image streets of suburban Allen that is distinctly ti- separate from its civic neighbors and -� from the Outer Zone. The design further organizes standard streetscape elements into an order that reinforces the fact that a visitor is approaching the downtown area of the city. This organization signifies to the visitor a location in the city relative to the CBD. As elements increase in stature, density, and order, the proximity to downtown becomes closer. Residential and commercial developments gain from such an identity streetscape design as designating a property "near' the core, but not "in the country." 8.10 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan The Approach Zone builds upon the naturalized plantings and features of the Outer Zone and draws them together in an architectural alignment The more formalized streetscape and architectural elements guide visitors toward downtown and signify the approach to the CBD Core Zone. Portals in the Approach Zone take the form of Civic "Mile Post" Orientation Markers that occur about half way through the zone at the intersection of two important Approach Zone streets These markers provide visitors with a visual landmark that they are indeed on an "image street" that leads to the Core Zone. Their orientation at a major Intersection also announces a change in course for those traveling on the north -south thoroughfares Civic Mile Post Orientation Markers occur at the following intersections • Alma Drive at Exchange Parkway • Alma Drive at the Proposed Bethany Drive Extension • Allen Heights Drive at Exchange Parkway • Allen Heights Drive at Bethany Drive • Watters Road at Highway 121 Intersections in the Approach Zone reflect the design of the Outer Zone and add another layer of complexity in paving color and plant material. Several of the Approach Zone Intersections are upgraded to Civic "Mile Post" treatments. The streets of the Approach Zone build upon the outer zone by organizing the thematic elements Into a more rhythmic pattern, setting a precedence for an even more ordered design sequence in the Core and CBD Zones. In order to denote certain important intersections about midway between the city limits and the CBD, several intersections should serve as "mile post" points, lending a civic presence and further directing visitors toward the CBD. Markers to either side of the roadway should continue the materials and forms of the CBD identity elements Intersections in the Approach Zone should echo the design and forms of the Outer Zone intersections while adding additional hardscape and landscape identity elements This additive process signifies the approach to downtown and increases the awareness of a civic presence as visitors near the heart of the City of Allen. These guidelines shall be enforced on the following intersections: Figure 8.5 Approach Zone CONCRETE LAXDECAPE EocE n'�' wnTH) CHINESE NSTACNIO (FEMALE) rcu aOc ME) TURF DUTER UVENOER CMPE MYRREe ZONE EE GALWoc ORNAMENTALSHRUSSANO GROUNDOUVER PLANTING CHINESEPISTACHIO(FEEWE) !.' ` 8'CA 2VO.0 jrYP.) A 130' radius landscape setback shall be observed from the center of the intersection to accommodate the Approach Zone Intersection design Structures and surface parking should not be allowed within this setback zone. Crosswalks should be 17'-0"wide with a 2'-0" scoring pattern grid, stained a consistent color throughout the city with a 1'-6" wide stained concrete band to either side of the crosswalk. Sidewalks and Trails should connect with crosswalks and handicap -access ramps to provide a safe and fully accessible pedestrian crossing across street 8.11 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Existing square steel light poles should be preserved Any existing "cobra head" type fixtures on telephone pole style poles should be replaced to match the newer square steel poles and fixtures. It is recommended that a "Pole Cap" riser is to be attached to the top of the existing light post so as to lend a more traditional feel to a modem pole. New street lights should be placed along the centerline of the median and should be placed on a masonry pedestal of batter and stone material to match other civic identity elements and should step in two tiers. Figure 8.6. Light Stantlartls Signal lights, signage, and utility boxes are perhaps the most significant hardware along urban and suburban corridors. They are highly visible and, if ill conceived, create a high volume of visual clutter through the streetscape. Multiple poles often occur due to lack of coordination among utility companies. These, combined with infrastructure such as light poles and regulatory signage, amount to a clustering of vertical elements in the landscape, sometimes even blocking other important signage from view. It is recommended that a uniform system of signage and infrastructure placement be established to unify these elements, thereby reducing the amount of visual clutter. A single row of canopy trees shall encircle the intersection 125' from the center of the intersection. Trees should be planted 25'-0" on center. One of the following species should be used within a single intersection: Chinese Pistachio (Female) (Pistachio chinensis) Bald Cypress (Taxodium distichum) American Sweet Gum (Liquidambar Styraciflua) Lacebark/ Drake Elm (Ulmus parvifolia) A single row of ornamental trees planted 8'-0" on center should form an inner ring in front of the canopy trees on the downtown side of the intersection. Lavender "Catawba" or "Muskogee" Crepe Myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica) are recommended. Both downtown corners of the intersection shall have the same cultivar. Ornamental shrub beds shall be planted in front of canopy and ornamental trees, consisting of at least 60% evergreen coverage. Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon) should be established in all areas not covered with paving, shrub, or groundcover. 8.12 2002.2022 Comprehensive Plan Figures] Approach Zane Parkway MEDIAN BERMS ORNAMENES TALTREIN 6:1 SLOPE GROUPINGS AT 35' O.C. WILDFLOWER OVERSEEDING All landscape areas should be irrigated by an automatic system to include tree -bubblers for all canopy and ornamental trees. The Approach Zone parkway streetscape guidelines aligns the elements from the Outer Zone in a more organized manner. The feel is more suburban in character as one departs the rural atmosphere of the outer zone and draws closer to downtown Allen. A 20 -foot landscape setback zone from the right-of-way on either side of designated Approach Zone streets is recommended. Structures and surface parking should not be allowed within the 20 -foot setback zone. Just as the creek and trail crossings have enhanced landscape plantings to celebrate the low points of natural topography occurring through the urban fabric, so shall the high points or hilltops along image streets. When visitors arrive at a crest they are presented with a long view out ahead and across the city. This naturally rolling topography along east -west streets is unique to the City of Allen and adds a layer of interest to the streetscape experience. Recommended median enhancements should continue those recommended in the Outer Zone. Medians should be bermed with groupings of four ornamental trees are to be planted 35'-0" on center along the centerline of the median where the cross dimension is 23'-0" or greater. Where the dimension is less than the required distance, the grouping shall be downsized in quantity to ft the given space. If the cross dimension is less than 8'-0", no ornamental trees should be required. Ornamental trees (While Crape Myrtles (Lagerstroemia indica)) should be 10'-0" on center and contained within a mulched planting bed, A single now of canopy trees is to be planted along both sides of designated Approach Zone streets at 50'-0" on center, 5'-0" off the back of curb between the curb and sidewalk. East-West streets (Bethany & Exchange) should utilize Red Oaks (Quercus shumardii) while North-South streets (Alma, Watters, Greenville, & future connector north of Allen Station Park) should use Live Oaks (Quercus virginiana). 8.13 zu MEDIAN BERMS ORNAMENES TALTREIN 6:1 SLOPE GROUPINGS AT 35' O.C. WILDFLOWER OVERSEEDING All landscape areas should be irrigated by an automatic system to include tree -bubblers for all canopy and ornamental trees. The Approach Zone parkway streetscape guidelines aligns the elements from the Outer Zone in a more organized manner. The feel is more suburban in character as one departs the rural atmosphere of the outer zone and draws closer to downtown Allen. A 20 -foot landscape setback zone from the right-of-way on either side of designated Approach Zone streets is recommended. Structures and surface parking should not be allowed within the 20 -foot setback zone. Just as the creek and trail crossings have enhanced landscape plantings to celebrate the low points of natural topography occurring through the urban fabric, so shall the high points or hilltops along image streets. When visitors arrive at a crest they are presented with a long view out ahead and across the city. This naturally rolling topography along east -west streets is unique to the City of Allen and adds a layer of interest to the streetscape experience. Recommended median enhancements should continue those recommended in the Outer Zone. Medians should be bermed with groupings of four ornamental trees are to be planted 35'-0" on center along the centerline of the median where the cross dimension is 23'-0" or greater. Where the dimension is less than the required distance, the grouping shall be downsized in quantity to ft the given space. If the cross dimension is less than 8'-0", no ornamental trees should be required. Ornamental trees (While Crape Myrtles (Lagerstroemia indica)) should be 10'-0" on center and contained within a mulched planting bed, A single now of canopy trees is to be planted along both sides of designated Approach Zone streets at 50'-0" on center, 5'-0" off the back of curb between the curb and sidewalk. East-West streets (Bethany & Exchange) should utilize Red Oaks (Quercus shumardii) while North-South streets (Alma, Watters, Greenville, & future connector north of Allen Station Park) should use Live Oaks (Quercus virginiana). 8.13 2002.2022 Comprehensive Plan Figure 8.8. In order to preserve and celebrate the natural topography of the City of Allen and to increase the public awareness of natural features in the city, sites adjacent to creeks, trails, and bridge/culvert crossings should be specially enhanced with masonry identity markers and riparian tree plantings. In conjunction with the Consolidated Alternative Transportation/Recreational Trails Plan, trails and creeks that cross Image Streets shall be marked with a masonry marker. Materials shall echo those of the CBD Core identity features. Signage should show the name of the creek and /or trail as appropriate for that location. Metal signage should be legible from vehicular traffic and supported from ascending masonry plinths. Sites for development should be crosschecked with the Plan and the city's Parks & Recreation Department to ensure compliance with required trail development. Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon) should be established in all areas not covered with paving, shrub, or groundcover and all landscape areas should be irrigated by an automatic system to include tree -bubblers for all canopy and ornamental trees. Turf zones should be irrigated with full head-to-head coverage to minimize over -spray onto streets and sidewalks. Turf and shrubs/groundcovers should be irrigated on separate zones and controllers placed away from street so as to be hidden from major pedestrian and vehicular view. 8.14 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Core Zone The Core Zone is that area generally bounded by Greenville Ave., Bethany Drive, Watters Road, and Exchange Parkway, containing the majority of non-residential uses within the City of Allen, and an area that surrounds the CBD Core. The Core Zone is the general destination of the approach streets and the visual culmination of the sequential street experience. Key to its differentiation is the recognition of its "destination" significance by enhancements of the streetscape that give greater accommodation to the presence and safety of pedestrians. The streets of the Core Zone are significantly more "pedestrian friendly" than the other streets of the streetscape hierarchy. Movement in the Outer Zone and the Approach Zone is "directed" movement. The purpose of the Outer Zone and Approach Zone streets are to cognitively establish one's relationship to the core... one's relationship to the destination of the hierarchical system. Therefore, the streetscape enhancement of these non-core zones is to articulate the "path" to the core and create visual messages for vehicular movement on the path. Once in the core, the streetscape changes in several significant ways • Information is part of the streetscape enhancement design • Monumentation is used to articulate a district instead of a portal • Intersection design is geared more to articulation of pedestrian crossing • Texture that can be best appreciated by slower movement is more characteristic of the streetscape design. • Color is more plentiful in the street planting The City of Allen is unique in that it is accessed from both surrounding cities at regular "street level" intersections and from the major highway of US 75. Many visitors enter the city from the US 75 Corridor and effectively bypass the hierarchical additive process from Outer Zone through the Approach Zone to Core. Visitors who enter from the US 75 Corridor are given a much different impression of the city upon arrival than those entering from other streets. The intersection at McDermott and US 75 becomes an important short cut to the "front door" of Allen City Hall and the Core Zone. This provides an opportunity for a Core Zone Identity Icon to further celebrate this intersection Included in the Core Zone Guidelines are requirements for city gateway portal entries along US 75. The Gateway Identity Icons at the north and south City Limits and US 75 celebrate the portal entries into the City of Allen while the Core Zone Identity Icon celebrates arrival at the Core Zone. Opportunities for enhanced civic gateways to the City of Allen along the US 75 Corridor include the following. • North City Gateway Identity Icon at US 75 & City Limits • South City Gateway Identity Icon at US 75 & City Limits 8.15 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan • Core Zone Identity Icon at US 75 and McDermott • The Core Zone Entry Intersections anchor the Core Zone and welcome visitors to the heart of the City of Allen. They aid in orientation and grant visitors their first impression of the Core Zone when arriving through the Outer and Approach zones. The boundary intersections define the edge of the Core Zone and signify arrival. Intersection identity markers should be decidedly civic in nature, celebrating the arrival at the core and echoing the forms and materials of City Hall and other core zone enhancements. The Core Zone Streets are the center of the city's commerce and activity. Its dominance as a hub for shopping, commercial, service, office, medical, and cultural activities creates a diverse array of land uses and slrestscape characteristics. The Core Zone's continuity as a perceivable zone within the city is also important for visitor orientation A cohesive streetscape imagery plan for the zone will also serve to strengthen the visual unity of the diverse land uses along its major corridors. Map 8.4. The Core Zone The Core Zone builds upon the streetscepe elements of the Approach and Outer Zones by further organizing them and tightening the rhythm. Increased furnishings and tree canopy will further announce - the arrival into the city center and create a pedestrian friendly environment, encouraging commerce and activity throughout the Core Zone. At the north and south borders of the City of Allen at US Highway 75, I ryl. Gateway Identity loons should be constructed to welcome visitors to II the City and claim the frontage of the highway for the City of Allen (See Map 8.8.). These icon structures shall be of a size and scale to be perceivable from the highway at highway speeds and reflect the i forms and materials of the CBD Core elements. The City of Allen I i logo should be incorporated into the design and the entire structure shall be up -lit to be fully legible at night. The intent is the celebration of Allen as a destination and claim an address on the much larger US 75 Corridor. The intersection of US 75 and McDermott is the most important entrance to the City of Allen from the 75 Corridor. It is the "express" Figure s s. Icon WP i_ 1 i The Core Zone builds upon the streetscepe elements of the Approach and Outer Zones by further organizing them and tightening the rhythm. Increased furnishings and tree canopy will further announce - the arrival into the city center and create a pedestrian friendly environment, encouraging commerce and activity throughout the Core Zone. At the north and south borders of the City of Allen at US Highway 75, I ryl. Gateway Identity loons should be constructed to welcome visitors to II the City and claim the frontage of the highway for the City of Allen (See Map 8.8.). These icon structures shall be of a size and scale to be perceivable from the highway at highway speeds and reflect the i forms and materials of the CBD Core elements. The City of Allen I i logo should be incorporated into the design and the entire structure shall be up -lit to be fully legible at night. The intent is the celebration of Allen as a destination and claim an address on the much larger US 75 Corridor. The intersection of US 75 and McDermott is the most important entrance to the City of Allen from the 75 Corridor. It is the "express" Figure s s. Icon WP 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan 9.1. GOVERNMENT Form of Government Allen is a home -rule city is governed by a Council of seven members, including the Mayor, in a Council - Manager form of government. All Council positions are elected at -large for staggered terms of three years or until their successors have been elected The City Council appoints to advisory and other Boards and Commissions, including the Planning & Zoning Commission, the Sign Control Board, the Board of Adjustment, the Parks & Recreation Board, and Keep Allen Beautiful, among others E -Government E -Government is the use of information technologies to further the governmental mission, reflected in services ranging from responding to citizens' questions via e-mail, accepting applications for permits, developing internal and external project management systems, to accepting payment for government services over the Internet. The potential for use of these technologies is limited only by the agency creativeness and commitment to service. Practical limitations to E -government include the availability of hardware and software systems, networks, communications, and the capabilities of agency personnel in developing and maintaining data and systems. Over the years, government has lagged behind other sectors of the economy in the implementation of cutting edge technologies Improvements in the portability and systems capabilities of computers, as well reductions in system costs, have made the use of technology increasingly attractive to all levels of government, although attracting and retaining personnel skilled in the use of management information systems will continue to be a challenge The City of Allen has made a commitment to improving the information and/or services available to the community through e -government a www.citvofallen.ora formerly www.ci.allen.tx us. The City's official website contains information updated daily on a wide range of City activities including public meetings, parks activities, public health alerts and capital project information. Shortcuts are available to guide users to particular areas of interest including employment opportunities, development codes and permit requirements, and recreational events. The site also includes useful links to other agencies and sites of interest. b. Interactive Maps. The development of interactive maps hosted by the University of Texas at Dallas (UTD) makes a great deal of information available not only to other departments and public agencies, but also to the public. Digital ortho-photographs, topography, subdivision data, street centerline and parcel information is available in a colorful and user-friendly environment. c. Paperless agenda. Information is provided to the members of the Council and the public concerning all agendas and agenda items. d SCADA. The City of Allen's Water and Wastewater Division has recently initiated the use of a computer oriented SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) system to control and monitor the water and wastewater systems. The SCADA system monitors levels, flows, security, and historical data for the pump stations, ground storage tanks, elevated storage tanks, and sewer lift stations and meters. This system improves the city's ability to provide citizens and businesses uninterrupted water and wastewater services. e. Meter reading The Meter Services Division of Community Services is implementing a meter change -out program from the conventional method of physically opening the meter box and reading the meter to the use of a handheld computer and wand. This wand automatically reads the meter by touching it to a pad mounted on the top of the box. This not only decreases the time for each read and thus reduces manpower requirements, but also will reduce the chance of workplace injuries, and eliminate errors caused by the former key punch method. f. Emergency Planning. The Allen Fire Department is working towards providing its citizens emergency planning guidelines on the City website. Guidelines for preparing for natural and man - 9.1.1 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan made disasters as well as improving Homeland Security are the focus. The City of Allen's Emergency Management Plan would also be available on the website Information about the City's warning siren system and the expansion of recommended actions citizens should take if the system is activated Is planned. g. The Allen Police Department is implementing a Computer Aided Dispatch System (CAD) that supports Police, Fire and EMS along with field reporting in the patrol vehicles. This new CAD system can significantly decrease the amount of time required to dispatch Police, Fire and EMS personnel, and maintain a higher degree of accuracy. This system will validate the call location for accuracy as well as display call information to the units in the Feld. The CAD system can provide responding units with hazardous material, fire hydrant status, and street closure information. In addition, the CAD system will be integrated with our Emergency 9-1-1 system so the callers information from incoming calls will automatically captured reducing the amount of time to enter calls for service into the system. This system will automatically prioritize call sequence based on established parameters and the seriousness of a particular call type. This system will improve the ability of the Police and Fire department to respond to emergency calls for service. h. Human Resource Management. The City of Allen employment application and Police Department employment packet are currently available on the City's website in Adobe format for printing. We anticipate having a Fire application packet online in the future. A summary of employee benefits is also listed on the website for applicants to review i. Automated permit information In time, many building department processes will be available online Permit information and reports, as well as various forms are already published on the web and transactional processes will soon follow. Automated telephone inspection request service has been available for the past four years. Functions such as contractor registration and licensing, payment of permit and inspection fees, and permit applications will eventually be offered online. The limiting factor involved with full online permitting is the documentation required for plan review, however, it is becoming more and more common to receive these documents in electronic format. The City Is presently developing the advance planning to utilize transactional system capabilities. A primary concern in any activity involving scheduling or payments is reliability and security. The scheduling of meeting rooms, utility payments, zoning and plat applications, building permits, and park program registrations are among the services which should be considered for E -government Citizen Survey Fifty-nine percent of respondents did not vote in the May 2002 election. As a follow-up to the question concerning voting, respondents were asked for the reasons that they did not vote. The answers are summarized on Table 9.1.1. Table 9.1.1. Yes Na %Total %Non Voters %Total %Non - Vaters on-mident 11.3% 184% 502% 818 of Re istered 4.6% 75% 57.0% 92.5 o Interest 4.4% 7.2% 57.2% 928 at enough knowted a about caiddmes 259% 420% 35,8% 58 0 ereonal able .bons 8.6% 13.9% 531% 86 1 No not know M an election 4.4% 7.1% 573% 92 9 id not know where a when to vote a4% 87% 561% 91.3 Inconvenient votinglocations 08% 13% 808% 98.7 Inconvenient votingfines 1.0% 16% 606% 984 aliseed with the win,Ci oran 3.5% 57% 581% 94.3 Non-aUen 2.8% 4.5% 588% 95.5 Source 2002 Citizen Survey 91.2 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Priorities and Implementation Strategies. Pnori : Encourage additional E -government services Implementation Strategies I. Implementation Strategy. Continue to update and maintain the Interactive Mapping System through interlocal procurements and agreements. ii. Implementation Strategy Initiate use of on-line billing payments, permits, and park and recreation program registrations. iii Implementation Strategy. Continue investment in labor saving technology. iv. Implementation Strategy. Continue to provide opportunities for city personnel to improve technical skills. v. Implementation Strategy Continue to focus on accurate and updated information. 9.1 3 2002-2022 Conrprahens" Plan 9.2. COMMUNITY FACILITIES & SERVICES Public Safety Community Policing Community Policing is: "both a philosophy and an organizational strategy that allows the police and community residents to work closely together in new ways to solve the problems of crime, fear of crime, physical and social disorder, and neighborhood dewy. The philosophy rests on the belief that law abiding people in the community deserve input into the policing process, in exchange for their participation and support. It also rests on the belief that solutions to contemporary community problems demand freeing both people and the police to explore creative, new ways to address neighborhood concerns beyond a narrow focus on individual crime incidents." The Allen Police Department is managed by the Chief of Police who reports to the City Manager. The responsibilities of the Office of the Chief of Police include, but are not limited to, planning, oversight of operations, internal affairs, and support services. Programs operated from the Office of the Chief of Police include the Chaplaincy Program, established to include death notification, employeetvictim counseling, and spiritual guidance from chaplains receiving training in police regulations, policies, and procedures; Internal Affairs conducts administrative investigations of alleged employee misconduct, inspects departmental operations and compliance with established policies and procedures. 9.2.1 Police Calls for Service 120,000 -- ----._.... _.-.. .. _.----.....-- -------._..._ 2.500 C 100,000 G 2,000 n 80.000 -- _ –. .__.- q 1,500 O V 80,000 -- d 1,000 40,000 – — _ - ___ - _ 'a_ 20.000 - - _ _ _ 500 (i 0 0 tree 1999 2000 2001 2002 O PoliceC h 49,711 89,N 92,570 105,573 108,M �CaIIsl1000 PCP 1,392 1,807 1,783 r 2128 1,899 9.2.1 2002-2022 Comprehanshra Plan Patrol The Patrol Division is the most visible aspect of the Allen Police Department Figure 8.2.1 Traffic Incklenffi and includes Patrol and Traffic. Officers assigned to Patrol work four '.500 - - - - - -- -- - -- - - - --- - 10 -hour shifts and may be assigned during the day, evening or night, '•0°° — — — - - proactive in crime prevention, Directed No Patrols, Park and Walks, and meeting — with citizens about their concems. Directed Patrols increase the visibility ° 1997 +99I 1999 2M 200+ 2002 and accessibility of patrol officers larmarcr 2 o z z + 2 - through routine patrols of "specialmWd „y +9e 141 +ss 12+ as u4 attention" areas. Citizens are mam-wYry Ise NO 925 1,992 9so 952 encouraged to call the police department to request Directed Patrols. The Park and Walks Program encourages officers to exit their patrol cars and walk shopping centers, businesses, parks and neighborhoods. The goal of the program is to meet the citizens in a more personal and relaxed setting. Likewise, citizens are urged to meet the officers who serve them. The Traffic Unit enforces state motor vehicle laws, investigates traffic accidents, and assists with complaints of abandoned and non -working vehicles. The K-9 Unit acts as a deterrent to criminal activity, building searches, area searches, tracking, evidence recovery, criminal apprehension, and drug detection. The Crisis Response Team is comprised of specialty trained tactical officers who are on call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week who respond to situations involving high-risk warrant service, armed or barricaded subjects, hostage situations, and suicidal subjects. 9.2.2 Figure 9.2.2 Citations 20,000 - _.. _.._.. _. ...-. 350 3 300 250 200 0 rj 150 5.000.. 100 g ,.. 50 0 0 u 1998 1999 2000 2001 2,89 �_ZMC ons 4487 ]2059 12,0840] 13+8 1248a_ �cawl.r. pop 199] 2302 - _ The K-9 Unit acts as a deterrent to criminal activity, building searches, area searches, tracking, evidence recovery, criminal apprehension, and drug detection. The Crisis Response Team is comprised of specialty trained tactical officers who are on call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week who respond to situations involving high-risk warrant service, armed or barricaded subjects, hostage situations, and suicidal subjects. 9.2.2 2002-2022 Comprehens/ve Plan PART CRIMES Part I Crimes include serious offenses: Murder, Rape, Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Burglary, Larceny - Theft, and Motor Vehicle Theft. Though Simple Assault is not considered to be a Part I Crime, statistical data of the offense is likewise captured for the purposes of comparing the total of assault -related offenses. Pun &2> v.rtl cnmaa.9.l,uvaml,. PART 11 CRIMES Part II Crimes generally refer to those crimes which include, but are not necessarily limited to: Forgery, Fraud, Stolen Property, Criminal Mischief, Liquor Law violations and Weapons offenses. Asignifcent portion of these offenses relate to stolen property. Figura Ba l Pad I Mmaaagaidst PmpFrty 2.aw i _ 599 ° IM 199. 1. 2000 2WI NL -I on000 a e i e 2 z iau Figum 9.25 Part II aMnra vera ego mo .99 0 ° Ira, Inw m9 vm aom __— .na. PART 11 CRIMES Part II Crimes generally refer to those crimes which include, but are not necessarily limited to: Forgery, Fraud, Stolen Property, Criminal Mischief, Liquor Law violations and Weapons offenses. Asignifcent portion of these offenses relate to stolen property. Figura Ba l Pad I Mmaaagaidst PmpFrty 2.aw i _ 599 ° IM 199. 1. 2000 2WI NL -I on000 a e i e 2 z iau o w.lma 9m I�w Investigative Services---� - _---- The Criminal Investigation Division includes Criminal Investigations, General Investigations, Narcotics Investigations, and Computer Forensics Investigations. The General Investigations Unit investigates unsolved offenses and are responsible for preparingffiling criminal cases with the Collin County District Attorney or other prosecuting agencies, investigating offenses ranging from criminal mischief, auto theft, and burglary to aggravated assault and homicide. POLICE Let 00 NOT CROSS POLICE EINE e0 NOT CROSS PO Crime Prevention The Community Relations Unit is under the supervision of the Support Services Division. It is comprised of three full-time officers, two of whom are stationed at a store front office at the Allen Premium Outlet Mall The Unit provides community education on Workplace Violence, Senior Citizen Crime, Stranger Danger, Crime Prevention, Tobacco Education, Help End Auto Theft (H.E.A.T ), Operation I.D. and Neighborhood Watch. The Community Relations Unit is responsible for the Citizens Police Academy. This program allows citizens and high school students to observe and train in all aspects of law enforcement. Many CPA graduates remain involved with the police department through the Volunteers in Policing (V.I.P.) and Citizens on Patrol (C.O.P.) programs. 9.2.3 Figum 9.25 Part II aMnra vera ego mo .99 0 ° o w.lma 9m I�w Investigative Services---� - _---- The Criminal Investigation Division includes Criminal Investigations, General Investigations, Narcotics Investigations, and Computer Forensics Investigations. The General Investigations Unit investigates unsolved offenses and are responsible for preparingffiling criminal cases with the Collin County District Attorney or other prosecuting agencies, investigating offenses ranging from criminal mischief, auto theft, and burglary to aggravated assault and homicide. POLICE Let 00 NOT CROSS POLICE EINE e0 NOT CROSS PO Crime Prevention The Community Relations Unit is under the supervision of the Support Services Division. It is comprised of three full-time officers, two of whom are stationed at a store front office at the Allen Premium Outlet Mall The Unit provides community education on Workplace Violence, Senior Citizen Crime, Stranger Danger, Crime Prevention, Tobacco Education, Help End Auto Theft (H.E.A.T ), Operation I.D. and Neighborhood Watch. The Community Relations Unit is responsible for the Citizens Police Academy. This program allows citizens and high school students to observe and train in all aspects of law enforcement. Many CPA graduates remain involved with the police department through the Volunteers in Policing (V.I.P.) and Citizens on Patrol (C.O.P.) programs. 9.2.3 2002-2022 Comp►ehens/ve Plan The Police Explorer program was established in calendar year 2000 and allows young people from ages 14-21 to explore the possibilities of a career in law enforcement. Members of Explorer Post 2000 take part in training and volunteer their services to the community. it All three Community Relations officers are Certified Crime Prevention Specialists and are qualified to conduct Home Insurance Inspections for reductions in homeowners insurance premiums. Theses officers are also qualified to conduct inspections at local businesses which can assist in deterring burglaries, shoplifting, and employee theft. They are also trained in Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED), which has its basic premise that the proper design and effective use of the physical environment can lead to a reduction in the incidence and fear of crime, thereby improving the quality of life. The School Resource Officer (S.R.O.) Unit has been established in the Allen Independent School District (A.I S D.), where uniformed officers are assigned to assist in crime prevention. The Community Relations Unit is also responsible for the annual National Night Out event. National Night Out is designed to (1) Heighten crime prevention awareness; (2) Generate support for, and participation in, local anticrime programs; (3) Strengthen neighborhood spirit and police -community partnerships; and (4) Send a message to criminals letting them know that neighborhoods are organized and fighting back. Animal Control The City's animal control shelter is located at the northwest comer of Allen Heights Drive and Bethany Drive, at 770 S. Allen Heights Drive. It is nearing capacity at this time, and expansion should be considered in the near future A second facility should be developed within ten (10) years. Municipal Court The Allen Municipal Court has jurisdiction over all fine -only offenses that have been committed within the Allen city limits. These offenses include Class C misdemeanors, traffic offenses and City ordinance violations. The court collects fines, conducts trials by jury and judge and issues warrants of arrest. The Municipal Judge arraigns prisoners arrested within the city limits in all types of felony and misdemeanor violations and performs other magistrate duties. The Municipal Court is located at One Butler Circle. This location to be determined, with considered department. Figum 9.2.9 Cellsfor Animal Control 0000 2,W 2 sao a 1889 TIMIM Cases Filed In Court 2a,aoo m,dao 5.000 1686 zoos zeal 'z,00z •casae Fred 9A52 ~ 12,756 17A45 17.M0 should be considered a temporary location, with a permanent in for access for parking and proximity to the police 9.2.4 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design Is a derivative of situational crime prevention which has as Its basic premise that the physical environment can be changed or managed to produce behavioral effects that will reduce the incidence and fear of crime, thereby improving the quality of life and enhancing profitability for business. There are four strategies They are: • Territoriality • Natural Surveillance • Activity Support • Access Control Like all situational crime prevention strategies, CPTED has as one of Its primary aims to reduce the opportunity for specific crimes to occur. Where CPTED differs from traditional target hardening strategies is that the techniques employed seek to use environmental factors to affect the perceptions of all users of a given space— addressing not only the opportunity for the crime, but also perceptions of fear on the part of those who may otherwise be victims. Drawing heavily on behavioral psychology, CPTED concepts and strategies take advantage of the relationships which exist between people and their environments. The way we read to an environment is more often than not determined by the cues we are picking up from that environment. Those things which make normal or legitimate users of a space feel safe (such as good lighting), make abnormal or illegitimate users of the same space feel unsafe in pursuing undesirable behaviors (such as stealing from motor vehicles). In practice, CPTED principles can be, and are, used in a wide range of contexts, from social planning to urban design; from community safety to specific security risk management applications. Police Officers certified as Crime Prevention Specialists with special training in CPTED assist the city planners in the development stage of sub -division and neighborhoods. Issues such as lighting, use of space, and landscaping can be designed to discourage criminal activity and to promote a feeling of safety. These officers also use CPTED to assist in established neighborhoods by Improving lighting, rapidly responding to the visual effects of crime (such as graffiti removal), and working with neighborhood associations to instill a sense of security. Citizen Surveys 1997 Survey responses concerning crime are compared with 2002 answers on Table 9 2.1. Table 9.2.1. Citizen Attitudes toward Crime RIME 1997 2002 It should be noted that when asked about choosing their next home in Allen, however, 98.1% of respondents indicated that concern for safety would not be a reason for at a Problem 739% 51.4 424 EGoM Somewhat of a Problem 24.5% 32.5 not choosing a home in Allen. Serious Problem 1.8% 1.4° Source Citizen Surveys Citizen evaluation of Animal Control has shifted somewhat, since 1997 (See Table 9.2.2.), although some of this may be attributed to the manner in which the question was posed. It was noted in the 2002 Survey that 54.7% of respondents felt that Abuselassault crisis assistance programs were needed in Allen. 9.2.5 Table 9.2.2. Citizen Rating of Animal Control Source: Cnzen Surveys 1997 2002 163% 23881.5% 424 EGoM 17.4% 232 Source: Cnzen Surveys 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Priorities and Implementation Strategies Priority. Implement safeguards to reduce chances of a terrorist attack in the city and in the event of an attack have a swift response to prevent further loss of life and increase the chances of suspect apprehension. Implementation Strategies. I. Work closely with all federal, state, county and local law enforcement agencies including, but not limited to, the F B.L. D.E.A, US Postal Service, US Secret Service, and the Texas Department of Public Safety. This strategy also includes continued participation in Inter -Local Mutual Aid Agreements with law enforcement agencies throughout the North Texas area. ii. Develop policies that specifically address acts of terrorism including proper police response, crime scene investigation, mass casualties, and bio -terrorism. in. Continuous training of police personnel in Homeland Security techniques Priority. Continued emphasis on the issue of illegal narcotics in our community through prevention programs, awareness efforts, education, and enforcement. Implementation Strategies: i. Develop new and innovative drug prevention programs to be taught at all levels in all public schools. ii. Increase awareness programs throughout the community utilizing Town Hall Meetings, drug abuse brochures, city web sites, city cable, and other forms of media. iii. Continued education of children and adults related to illegal narcotics through various police sponsored programs such as the Student Police Academy and the Citizen's Police Academy iv. Support and enhancement of the Police Narcotics Unit in their efforts to combat drugs in our community through investigations and enforcement of state and federal laws. Priority. To enhance our community policing efforts throughout the department and the community in an effort to create a strong partnership between citizens, businesses, and the police department in an effort to reduce crime. Implementation Strategies: i. Continued promotion of programs such as Neighborhood Watches, Citizen's Police Academy, Volunteers in Policing, Citizen's on Patrol, Police Explorers and the Student Police Academy. ii. Creation of new programs that enhance the principles of community policing and build a stronger bond between the police and the community we serve. iii. Expansion of the Community Relations Unit whose primary focus will be to reduce crime in the community through education programs, targeted enforcement efforts, safety education, and rapid responses to preventing new tons of crime 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Priority. Implement traffic control strategies to reduce accidents related to excessive speed and careless driving, and injuries caused by not wearing a seatbelt. Implementation Strategies: i Finalize boundary adjustment agreements with adjacent communities to establish clear traffic enforcement/jurisdiction authority and right-of-ways. ii. Continued seeking of grant funding for the purpose of education and enforcement of traffic laws in an effort to obtain voluntary compliance of all traffic laws by motorists. iii. Expansion of the Traffic Unit in an effort to encourage voluntary compliance of all tragic laws. This unit is also responsible for determining the cause of accidents and the determination of areas that need increased enforcement due to an increased accident rate. Priority. Continued and enhanced police services in all Allen Independent School District Schools though the School Resource Officer Programs. Implementation Strategies: i. Continued staffing allocations of police personnel assigned to all AISD schools whose primary job function will be providing a safe learning environment for all students ii. Continued partnership between the police department and the AISD administration. Priority. To enhance the quality of police services provided to the citizens and visitors of Allen. Implementation Strategies: Implementation of new policies, and refinement of current policies, to address changes in the community, and in policing, in an effort to provide the best service possible Enhance police service through continued training of police personnel in new and innovative strategies. Continued training of basic skills for officers. iii. Adoption of accredited policies and procedures and acceptance as an Accredited Law Enforcement Agency through CALEA. iv. Conduct regular surveys of public opinion regarding the perceived needs of the community and the confidence the community has in the police department. This information will assist police officials in changing and adapting to the needs of the community and its perception of the performance of the police department. 9.2.7 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan 9.3. PUBLIC SAFETY Fire The Allen Fire Department is dedicated to the protection of life and property from fire, natural disaster or other emergencies, and the delivery of services in a professional and cost-effective manner. Services include emergency medical, fire suppression, rescue, fire investigations, emergency management, fire code enforcement and fire prevention and education. Fire Stations The City of Allen presently has four fire stations: The new Central Station located at 310 Century Parkway, Station No. 2 at 1100 East Exchange Parkway west of Allen Heights Drive, Station No. 3 at 1021 East Bethany Drive at Heritage Parkway, and Station No. 4 at 615 North Alma Drive, comer of Comanche Drive and Alma Drive. Map 9.3.1. depicts current and potential fire station locations. The following apparatus are located at the fire stations Central Fire Station -310 Century Parkway, Allen, Texas 75013 Truck 1, (Aerial Ladder) 1500 GPM Pumper Medic 1, (MICU) Engine 7, (Reserve), 1500 GPM Pumper Brush 1, (Grass Fire Vehicle) Rescue 1, (Heavy Rescue) Fire & Severe Weather Safety Trailer– (Safety Training for Children) Administrative Units–All are based out of the Central Fire Station Chief 491, Fire Chief Fire Marshal 491, Fire Marshal / (Fire Prevention) Chief 492, Assistant Chief (Operations and EMS) Chief 493, Assistant Chief (Training) Fire Marshal 492, Fire Prevention Specialist EMS 492, EMS Captain (EMS) Station 2--1100 E. Exchange Parkway, Allen, Texas Engine 2, 1500 GPM Pumper Medic 2, (MICU) Station 3--1021 E. Bethany Drive, Allen, Texas Engine 3, 1500 GPM Pumper Medic 3, (MICU) Station 4--615 N. Alma Drive, Allen, Texas Truck 4 - (Aerial Ladder), 1500 GPM Pumper Medic 4, (MICU) There are three fire platoons - A, B. & C Shifts. Allen firefighters currently work 24 hours on and 48 hours off. Fire Administration works 8 a.m. - 5 p m., Monday through Friday. Minimum staffing on first-line Engines and Trucks is three (3) firefighters. Ambulances (MICU) are staffed by two paramedictfirefghters. In addition, the city maintains mutual aid agreements with all fire departments in Collin County. 93.1 {zqy� il'it n" 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Table 9 3.1. Selected Statistics Type of Call FY 2001 FY 2002 Structure Fires 44 45 Other Fires/Calls for Service 885 922 EMS 1402 1813 Hazardous Conditions 181 194 Total Incidents 2,512 2,n4 Shift Fire Inspections 894 1000 Average Fire Response Time 4.25 min 4 40 min Average EMS Response Time 4:05 in 4.10 min Fire Investigation National Fire Protection Association Fire and EMS response standard is five minutes. Additionally, on May 16, 2002, the City entered an automatic assistance agreement with the City of Plano (Resolution 2046-5-02 (R). Pursuant to the terms of this agreement, the first response to calls within designated areas of each city will be by the other. The designated areas are shown on Map 9.3.1.) The investigation of fires is the responsibility of the Fire Marshal. The determination of the muse and origin of fires identifies whether a fire was accidentally or intentionally started Fires determined as ARSON are investigated vigorously and those responsible are prosecuted to the full extent of the law. The investigation of fires can also help to determine public education needs as well as identify trends in defective appliances or other equipment musing fires. Fire Prevention and Education A primary tool in preventing fres is the annual inspection of all commercial properties. Residential inspections are performed on request and are free of charge to all Allen residents. Inspections are performed by shift firefighters under the direction of the Fire Marshal, who is also responsible for enforcement of fire codes, inspections and community education programs. Commercial buildings in excess of 6,000 square feet and all multi -family dwellings must be sprinklered. The National Fire Protection Association curriculum "Learn Not to Burn' is taught in all Allen ISD elementary schools. This program is complemented by fire station tours, fire safety programs and apparatus displays. The Juvenile Firesetter Intervention Program Fire setting by children and adolescents has become a problem of increasing concern to fire departments. National statistics indicate that juvenile fresetters are responsible for significant fire losses, deaths and injuries each year. Recognizing the significance of this problem, the Allen Fire Department has instituted an educational and counseling program in cooperation with mental health professionals. The program attempts to teach children the dangers of fire and how it should be safely used. Contact with fresetters determines which children need to be referred to professional counselors for evaluation and treatment. Emergency Medical Services Eighty percent of Allen firefighters are cross -trained as Paramedics. A Paramedic is permitted to perform advanced life support procedures such as medication administration, cardiac defibrillation, and chest decompressions. The level of service provided by the Paramedics in Allen far exceeds that provided by most fire departments. The Department's ambulances have earned the Mobile Intensive Care Unit designation from the Texas Department of Health because of the advanced level of equipment and training of the Paramedics. All fire apparatus in the Allen Fire Department are equipped with the same level of equipment as the MICUs. This allows any fire department apparatus to promptly respond and begin patent treatment. It further allows the department to operate fewer MICUs than communities not utilizing this approach to service delivery Emergency Preparedness The Fire Marshal is responsible for maintaining the Allen Emergency Management Plan for response to natural and man-made disasters. The Outdoor Warning Siren System is tested at 1:00 p m. on the first 93.3 2002.2022 Comprehensive Plan Wednesday of each month. All firefighters are required to attend 12 hours of Haz-Mat First Responder training along with 20 hours per month of ISO training as well as 20 hours of State Commission approved CE. Priorities and Implementation Strategies Priority: Continue Inter -jurisdictional Cooperation to handle all potential emergencies Implementation Strategies: a. Cultivate and maintain relationships with neighboring communities to share emergency resources when and where appropriate b. Develop Specialty Rescue Team Sharing- Neighboring departments are working together to develop a system to share rarely used but critical specialty rescue team capabilities. The communities of Frisco, Plano, Allen, and McKinney have the opportunity to work together to distribute the expense to equip and train specialty teams such as hazardous materials response, trench rescue, confined space rescue, and swift water rescue. Each community could specialize in one or two of the areas and share their capabilities with their neighbors c. Automatic Assistance Agreements- Neighboring communities can work together to cross city limits to provide the closest appropriate response to an emergency By allowing the closest unit to respond, the receiving community is able to provide the service needed without building and staffing an additional fire station. d. Administrative Resource Sharing- The administrative responsibilities of providing fire and emergency medical services is rapidly increasing in complexity. State and national mandates on safety, incident reporting, exposure tracking, person protective equipment, and training are adding to the administrative requirements. By jointly developing policies and procedures to meet these requirements, area fire departments can lower the impact of these new and ever increase mandates. e. Joint Planning -As neighboring departments increasingly work together to provide cost effective services to their communities, the need to plan fire station locations, equipment purchases, radio compatibility, and other operational needs increases. Priority: Continue employee training and development Implementation Strategies: a. A Fire Department is only as good as its personnel. The AFD is beginning the implementation of a development program for current and future Driver/Operator/Engineers and officers. These programs, based on state and nation fire service programs, will serve to develop incumbents and promotional candidates to their full potential and help insure consistent quality of service from these personnel. The development of personnel goes against traditional fire service practice of on the job training. The old method put personnel in positions of critical importance and hopes they learn as they go. It is more proactive and less risky to develop the personnel prior to placing their promotion to critical positions Priority: Meeting Growth of Organization Implementation Strategies: a. Actively recruit cross -trained candidates. Attracting cross -trained candidates prevents the estimated $40,000 expense and eight months of training to send an employee to paramedic school. Likewise, it eliminates the $28,000 expense and four months of training to send an employee to the fire academy. By actively promoting the department to cross -trained personnel, we can avoid these expenses and immediately put the employee in the field. b. Retain existing employees through well managed compensation and benefit programs c. Retain existing employees through the use of modern management techniques 9.3.4 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan 9.4. COMMUNITY FACILITIES & SERVICES Parks & Recreation Classification of Parks The concept of the future park system takes into consideration the stream valleys, the woodlots, the present park system and future needs of the city as it grows to the west. The major stream valleys—Rowlett Creek, Mustang Branch, Watters Creek and Cottonwood Creek (Allen Station Park"hould be the framework of the parks and open space system. Where possible, major parks should be located along the stream valleys and linked by trails utilizing the greenbelt system. Linkages should be provided to channel users to the major parks and greenbelts. The biennial Allen Parks, Recreation, and Open Space MasterPlan, 2000– 2010 supplements the Comprehensive Plan and provides additional detail concerning the development of the park system and individual parks within the system Allen's parks follow a standard classification system tailored to the size of the community. Pocket Parks. Unfit the early 1980's, small neighborhood parks that were 2 acres or less in size were constructed in some of the neighborhoods (e.g., Hillside Playground and Walden Park). The park plan now discourages the construction of these small sites for reasons of maintenance and efficiency. The city nevertheless realizes the importance of adequate landscaping for these parks. Future planning efforts will encourage retention of small undeveloped parcels by neighborhood associations with appropriate landscaping to promote leisure activities. Neighborhood Parks. Neighborhood parks are the focal point of a neighborhood where residents have the opportunity to meet and socialize. Each neighborhood should have a park that provides both passive and active recreation opportunities. Neighborhood parks should be located in an area that provides for easy access, preferably adjacent to or near a school or greenbelt. These parks should not be located adjacent to major thoroughfares or commercial areas. The neighborhood parks should serve the recreational needs of the area within a one-half mile radius. At full development, Allen should have 20 to 25 neighborhood parks, each 10 to 15 acres in size. Facilities expected in neighborhood parks are: • Accessible play equipment meeting United States Consumer Product Safety Commission standards for children under 5 and older than 5 years of age • Picnic areas with tables, cook grills and trash receptacles, shelters, and drinking fountains • Multipurpose courts for basketball and volleyball, or lighted tennis courts • Level open play area for athletic team practice and "pick-up" games • Landscaping development for beautification and screening • Security lighting and an internal trail system linked to neighborhood sidewalks. Neighborhood parks should be designed to the following criteria: • At least 5 acres in size when adjacent to an elementary school or greenbelt, otherwise 15 acres in size • No more than one-third of the site occupied by active recreational uses; one-third would be buffer area around the park and one-third passive or natural areas • Facilities provided to serve mostly neighborhood needs • Located adjacent to an elementary school or a greenbelt, If possible • Children's play area, picnic tables, benches, and open lawn areas for informal play be designed to meet the needs of the neighborhood • Not used for organized athletic activities, except as days -up practice areas • Serve residential areas within a %mile radius Community Parks. A typical community park serves several neighborhoods and is located within 1.5 to two miles of the majority of its users. Community parks typically contain neighborhood park amenities and additional 9.4.1 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan specialized facilities such as lighted athletic fields not normally found in neighborhood parks. Community parks should provide active and passive uses. The plan provides for five community parks. One future community park should be located along Rowlett Creek, one along Watters Creek, Celebration Park in northeast Allen, and two existing parks, Ford Park East, Ford Park West and Bethany Lakes also serve that purpose. Each park should total not less than 50 acres in size and should be located along major thoroughfares so that traffic intrusion into neighborhoods is minimized. In addition to neighborhood park facilities, community parks normally contain the following: • Lighted competitive athletic facilities such as soccer, softball, tennis, baseball and basketball • Multipurpose trails for walking, jogging, exercise, and transportation • Recreation center, swimming pools, or group meeting facilities • Support facilities such as an internal road system, lighted parking areas, rest rooms, concessions, and security lighting • Landscaping development for beautification and screening • Accommodating facilities for large special events Community parks should be designed to the following criteria. • Serve residential areas within a 1'/: to 2 mile radius • Include 50 acres or more land • Located adjacent to a greenbelt, if possible • Provide adequate on-site parking areas • Have no more than one-third of the site occupied by active recreational uses; one-third would be buffer area; and one-third natural areas Citywide Parks. Citywide parks serve the entire city and are normally 75 acres in size or larger, and may contain specialized attractions such as a nature areas, lakes, historic areas, or botanical gardens, as well as neighborhood and community park amenities. Citywide parks should include natural amenities and be located adjacent to greenbelts and major thoroughfares Programs provided at Citywide parks include events. • Lakes, forests, and nature education facilities • Multipurpose trails • Botanical gardens, arboretum, or related facility • Amphitheater or gathering place for events • Lakes, fishing piers, shelters, and other attractions • Support facilities such as an internal road system, lighted parking areas, rest rooms, concessions, and security lighting Citywide parks should be designed to the following criteria: • Include at least 75 acres of land and preferably 100 acres or more • Include necessary development pertaining to the needs of special activities including athletic complexes, historicallarchaeological and natural preserves, botanical gardens and day camps • Include lakes or water bodies 9A.2 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Figure 9.4.1. Allen Station Park Concept Plan Greenbelt and Linkage Parks. Preservation of greenbelts improves the quality of the urban environment. Greenbelts link neighborhoods, parks, schools, and other points of interest, expanding the perception of space especially when parallel to a street. The design of community, neighborhood, and linear parks should accommodate hike and bike paths. Trails and on -street bicycle lanes should be developed in such a way that major parks and destination points are connected to each other and to residential areas. Cyclists should be afforded reasonable access bike paths near their resi- dence, and cycle to a destination point. Recreational trails and alternative transportation routes has been consolidated into a single plan. Reference Section 4 Transportation. Greenbelt areas should be maintained in their natural state to the extent consistent with maintaining adequate flood control systems. This concept reduces maintenance costs, while providing passive outdoor recreational opportunities. The City should consider conservation easements on floodplain lands and other areas where appropriate. Single4oaded collectors along greenbelts enhances public access to the trail system, as well as providing more effective maintenance. Greenbelt and linkage parks should. • Include landscape development and beautification • Buffer development between residential and higher land use 9.4.3 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan • Provide multipurpose trail systems • Access playgrounds and picnic facilities Greenbelts and linkage parks should be designed to the following criteria: • Primarily be located within the 100 -year fully developed floodplain conditions • Provide a trail, walk, or bicycle paths • Require limited mowing and labor intensive maintenance • Provide links to other recreational areas. Special Use Parks. Park facilities that do not ft into one of the categories above are classified as special use parks. These facilities may be temporary use facilities, not large enough to serve as a community or citywide facility. Inventory of Existing Facilities The number and Acreage of city facilities Is summarized on Table 9.4.1. Table 9.4.1. Summary of City Park Facilifies/Acreage Source: Palls 8 Recreation Depammer t The inventory of all city parks and improvements is shown on Table 9 4.2 and the location of each park is shown on Map 9.4.1. 9.4.4 count Acreage Ty,,e Park Dev Urd. Pocket 3 0 0.9 Neighborhood 14 4 125.9 Community 3 3 2820 Cit Ge 1 0 133.0 5 raal use 3 0 30.0 Facilities 4 0 3.0 Greenbelt 145.5 Total 28 T 720.3 Source: Palls 8 Recreation Depammer t The inventory of all city parks and improvements is shown on Table 9 4.2 and the location of each park is shown on Map 9.4.1. 9.4.4 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Table BA.2.PMN AND FnllL INVENTORY da Pk N. S t y=j Th... g P 4 � _ �N B Pei* CNy�Parka Men Station Pei C 133 1998 Readied Y E Y 22 Y Y 9 Y Communky Pere Bemany takes PeM C 40 1991 Y G Y 1 14 Y 3 Y Y Y 2 Faro Park East Afl b C a 1986 Whapw Y G Y 1 4 Y 6 3 FON Park VhN O 20 1986 Y G 1 10 Y Y 1 14 4 2 1 Y Y y Celsbaboh Pai G 102 2000 N Walbn Blanch Pai C 57 2000 N Esteee Pmerty C 40 2002 N Nalebbomood Parke Bethany Ridge Texas Pai N 46 2001 Coastal Y Y 1 Y Y Cmmnwooe Bend Pei N 5 1909 Y Y County Meadows Pai N 8 1993 Y 8 Y Y Y Day5Pnn9 Natu Texas P.. N 5 2001 BINa Y 1 4 Y Y Y Y Glendoser PaM Soutlrxe N 9 2001 M Y 2 Y 1 Y Y Green PaM Nbet N 5 1888 Texas Y 1 6 Y Y 1 V HeMeps Pei N 3 1999 Big Bend Y Y Y Y Logit Creek Pai N 5 2001 Y 1 6 Y 0 1 1 t 1 Y Reinbee PaM N 5 1997 Y Y Reed PeM H91 N 9 1999 CR V 1 ] Y 9 1 1 1 Shatlow Lakes Red Pei id: N ] 1999 R— Y 1 1 Y SNrY Pai N 9] 1W6 Y 1 4 Y 1 1 Y 9.4.5 0 m ,111111''''11��111111' . a V E fib Sp c -I A �n38 6 z 1»aP.rx m am.a• a E•1•bllsM1etl on < < < lop•tl (YM) .MNMn aeo-aom• •crrtlonal Lontr mpM1ltheater K 6 Nliona i Y k of Plcnk hblr yy laygrountl P � 0 nM D n .tm T.N. (sotl aamr) IkNBik•Tmil. T Ib Btatkna O a K oorr FIaMs )Lk) S' ..r FI.M.)BMN) Baseballlaahball Fl•IM )VO Bn.WIWl bWl R.M. oolb•II FiaMa nnl. capm (LIQ plleyball Court asketballL urt oiler Mockry lank pen A. < .1, Paol I.Ilina Ptr/W.nook lubbau.. anrnr Court 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Table 9.4.3. provides a summary of facilities provided by local school districts which may be available to residents and groups on a limited basis. See also Map 9.4.2. Table 9.4.3. School Facilities SCHOOLNAME $ District r E 2 W ((gg�a1 =A m 4m' c4 LL Allen Hloh School Y AISD 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 Lovren, Center Y AISD 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 Cudis Middle School ly AISD 1 1 1 i 1 Ford Middle School Y AISD 7 1 1 2 1 Ererkson Middle N AISD 7 1 1 2 Andersen Ekmenta Y AISD 1 7 1 1 Bo Elemenbi Y AISD 1 1 7 Green Elements Y AISD 1 1 1 Ken Elements N AISD 1 i 1 Norton Elementan, N I AISD 1 1 1 Reed Sementar, Y AISD 1 1 1 Rountree Bementaiv N AISD 1 1 1 Story Elemerdan, Y AISD 1 1 1 Vaughan Elementary Y AISD 1 1 1 Lost Creek Elemntan, N AISD I I 1 1 1 1 Arbw Lakes Elenientanr N AISD 7 7 T,dnC.k.Elen,e.Ian, I N AISD 7 1 Bolin Eleinerden, Y AISD 1 7 7 1 Beverly Eleinentenr Y PISD 7 7 i Rawr ElemenWry Y PISD 2 2 1 Love oy Elernenhiry Y I LISD II 1 Total 5 T 11 1T 5 18 5 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 <C t: 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Private Recreational Facilities City and school facilities are supplemented by recreational facilities owned and operated by neighborhood associations and multi -family communities but are limited to neighborhood residents and their guests. See Table 9.4.4 for an inventory of these facilities and Map 9.4.2. for their location. Table 9 4 4. Invenfnry of Private Recroatinnal Fenailiee 9.4.10 2002.2022 Comprehensive Nan Table 9.4.4. Inventory of Private Recreational Facilities A significant contribution to the park and open space resources of Allen is the Connemara Land Conservancy Trust which hosts an annual outdoor art exhibit. The Trust includes 76 acres in Plano adjacent to Rowlett Creek, a greenbelt area to which additional area could be added. The Chase Oaks Golf Course is a public course with two holes located in Allen on the north side of Rowlett Creek. 9.4.11 SUBDIVISION = c m E4t U $ 3 a i I m a S rpi S 5 Maple Trails 1 1 Codomwoe Creek 1 1 Wrx4ong Wisp 1 1 Se81els Gate 2 1 1 1 1 1 V 1 Pay, Place T.ho 2 1 i Chapaval TowNmmes 1 1 Wltlxood Village 1 y 1 V Crest Place 2 2 Y 1 V TOTAL M 8 - 1 3 1 1 1 28 A significant contribution to the park and open space resources of Allen is the Connemara Land Conservancy Trust which hosts an annual outdoor art exhibit. The Trust includes 76 acres in Plano adjacent to Rowlett Creek, a greenbelt area to which additional area could be added. The Chase Oaks Golf Course is a public course with two holes located in Allen on the north side of Rowlett Creek. 9.4.11 a N 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Standards & Guidelines The National Parks and Recreation Association (NRPA) maintains the most widely accepted guidelines and standards for park development as published in the 1990 edition of Recreation, Parks and Open Space Standards and Guidelines. NRPA nevertheless recommends that local standards be developed. NRPA and City standards for public pad* land are shown in Table 9.4 5. TABLE9.45 PARK LAND REQUIREMENTS(in acres) CITY AND NRPA STANDARDS NRPA Standard City Standard Plan Year Fadlity Type f1000 Population Build -out 98.000 Population /1000 popula tion Build -out 98,000 Population 2002 Required (Popula5on 55,000) 2002 Actual (Porsuaton 55,000) 2002 Acres Over/ (Under) Addhlond Required! for Wild- uild55.000) out Pocket Parks WA N/A 0 0 0.9 0.9 0 Neighborhood Parka 1262.5 122-245 2.15 211 118 125.9 7.9 85.1 Canty Parks' 504r0 490-784 4A 392 220 282 62 110 Cdyr4tle 5-10 490-980 4.5 441 248 133 (115) Varies Varies N/A WA 30 30 NIA N/A WA WA WA 1455 145.511.3-205 d3MVaries REQUIREMENT 1,102-2,009 1085 1.044 588 7203 134.3 "'Other" indudes floodplain areas Wlizetl as greenbelts and linkage paries 9.4.13 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan The standards for provision of recreational facilities is analyzed in Table 9.4.6. TABLE SAS PARK FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS CITY AND NRPA STANDARDS CM of Alen. Texas NRPA Standee! City Standad Plan Year Faulty Type /1000 populabo a Buildm 98,000 Population /1000 population Build -out 98,000 Papulation 1990 (Actual) Papulation 19,315 2002 (Actual) Population 55,000 Ultimate by City Standard I Over/ (Under) Swmrdrg Pool 0.05 5 03 3 1 2 3 (1) Piano Sites 2.91 285 3.13 350 15 89 350 (261) Hlki glNature TmIW 0.11 ml. 11.1 ml 0.68 67 ml 7 20 mi 67 mi (47 mi) Tennis 0.5 57 0.42 41 6 20 41 (21) Multi -Use Fields Vales 80 031 30 1 4 30 (26) SoSbaMBaseball (Yoram 011 0.35 11 G 34 P 0.20 0.235 20 G 23 P 3 G 1P 13 G 1 P 20 G 23 P (/) (22) Softball (Adult) 0.11 10 0.11 11 3 3 11 (8) Football 0.05 5 0.04 4 2 2 4 (2) Sasser 012 046 12G 45 P 0.26 0.20 25G 20 P 6 2 9G 8 P 25G 20P (16) (12) Basketball 0.08 7 0.14 14 6 9 14 (5) Outdoor Theater •• ^ 0.02 2 0 1 2 (1) Recreation Center 0.04 4 0.041 4 0 1 4 (3) Playttroun is ^ 28^ 6 18 28 (10) Send Volleyball 0.07 7 0 1 7 (6) In-line Hockey 3 003 3 0 1 3 (2) Altema8ve Transpodatron/Rsereational Trail Plan 9.4.14 2002-2021 Coinprehenshre Plan CITIZEN SURVEYS The 1997 Citizen Survey asked a random sampling of the population how often the respondent or a member of their family would use various types of park facilities and programs. The percentage of responses of "Daily" or "Once a week" are summarized as "Often," while usage 2-3 times a month is characterized as "Occasionally." In 2002, respondents were asked how many times the same facilities were actually used. The comparisons are shown on Tables 9.4.7. Source: Allen CWen Surreys Table 9.4.8. examines the reported frequency of respondent use various types of recreational programs. TABLE948 PERCENTAGE MOST FREQUENTLY USED PROGRAMS 1997Would Use' 2002'Adually Used' TABLE 9.4.7. Occasionally Often Occasionally Never Used Children's Recreation 324 PERCENTAGE MOST FREQUENTLY USED COMMUNITY FACILITIES 40 78.0 1997'Would Use' 250 1.4 2002'Actuelly Used 90.5 Facilities Ogen Occasionally Often Ok a Tonally Never Used Recreation Center 28.9 20.8 126 6.2 WA Trails 466 25.5 237 121 422 Indoor Pool 372 29.3 5.2 4.8 734 00door Pod 327 30A 6.0 6.0 74.4 Ball Helots 422 21.6 169 66 642 Tennis Courts 14.0 2A 2.8 2.4 83.3 Basketball Courts 221 19A 3.1 29 822 Parks 43.2 31.7 29.5 17.9 22.3 Hike B Bike Trails 45.5 277 237 12.1 422 Jogging Pags, Exercise 47.8 30.0 184 8.7 579 Golf Course 244 28.1 3.4 4.0 79.2 Natural Open Space 31.5 270 204 11.1 445 IrNine Hockey 12.6 12.6 1.7 0.7 92.2 Source: Allen CWen Surreys Table 9.4.8. examines the reported frequency of respondent use various types of recreational programs. TABLE948 PERCENTAGE MOST FREQUENTLY USED PROGRAMS 1997Would Use' 2002'Adually Used' Program Often Occasionally Often Occasionally Never Used Children's Recreation 324 26.3 57 40 78.0 Teenage Recreation 283 250 1.4 18 90.5 Adult Recreation 184 256 3.4 18 85.5 Senior Recreation 13.8 87 IT) 06 83.4 Source Allen Citizen Surveys Responses to the question concerning the need for additional park facilities and respondent's willingness to pay additional taxes are summarized on Table 9.4.9. and compared with a similar question posed in the 1997 Survey. 9.4.15 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Table 9.4.9. Percentage Response Support for Additional Facilities 1997-2002 Source: Allen Citizen Surveys Support for additional park facilities has clearly declined since the 1997 survey. This opinion is understandable given the level of City commitment to the development of new parks and upgrade of facilities in previously developed parks since 1997. The development of additional active athletic fields received the least amount of support, while support Continues to be highest for the development of greenbelts and passive parks, although those supporting additional athletic fields were more likely to be willing to pay higher taxes than respondents supporting other types of facilities. Respondents were asked which additional facilities should be pursued and how they should be financed. The results of these questions are summarized on Table 9.4.10. Respondents were split on support for these facilities, with the strongest negatives (over 40%) registered against an outdoor amphitheatre, a multi- cultural theatre, a museum, a golf course and a famrdranch heritage center. Those answering "yes" were asked how these facilities should be financed. The "% of Yes" supporting specific financing aRematives is compared (% of Total Survey") with the total number of persons responding to the Survey. Table 94.10. Support for New Facilities 1997 2002 Type of Park Facility Yes No Yes No Vi to pay higher taxes %Yes %Total Survey Greenbelt, Linear Parks 69.5 30.5 49.9 522 36.1 17 7 Passive Parks (hiking, etc) 04 16.6 MA 265 37.9 20.2 AO1ahc Fields 566 43.4 25.3 49.5 41.2 105 Playgrounds 703 29.7 41.0 36.0 39.2 158 Source: Allen Citizen Surveys Support for additional park facilities has clearly declined since the 1997 survey. This opinion is understandable given the level of City commitment to the development of new parks and upgrade of facilities in previously developed parks since 1997. The development of additional active athletic fields received the least amount of support, while support Continues to be highest for the development of greenbelts and passive parks, although those supporting additional athletic fields were more likely to be willing to pay higher taxes than respondents supporting other types of facilities. Respondents were asked which additional facilities should be pursued and how they should be financed. The results of these questions are summarized on Table 9.4.10. Respondents were split on support for these facilities, with the strongest negatives (over 40%) registered against an outdoor amphitheatre, a multi- cultural theatre, a museum, a golf course and a famrdranch heritage center. Those answering "yes" were asked how these facilities should be financed. The "% of Yes" supporting specific financing aRematives is compared (% of Total Survey") with the total number of persons responding to the Survey. Table 94.10. Support for New Facilities Source: 2002 Citizen Survey The percentage of respondents attending these types of facilities in other cities is shown on Table 9.4.11. 9.4.16 Pursue? Support User Fees Support New Taxes Reallocation of Texas Facility Yes No %Yes %Total Survey %Yes %Total Survey, %Yes %Total Survey AboretumlGarden 390% 341% 680% 26.6% 7.1% 2.8% 29.0% 11.3% Outdoor Amphitheatre 341% 408% 683% 233% 11.7% 4.0% 283% 9.7% Small Community theatre 380% 335% 729% 27.7% 9.4% 3.6% 22.8% 87% Children's Community Theatre 34.0% 34.0% 63.0% 216% 12.4% 4.2% 26.8% 9.1% Muni cultural theatre 197% 453% 651% 128% 101% 2.0% 24.3% 48% Museum 24.6% 49.1% 809% 199% 7.3% 18% 146% 36% Golf Course 24.6% 48.9% 80.9% 19.9% 3.6% Teen Center 39.2% 307% 462% 181% 363% 142% Performing Arts Center 34.3% 35.3% 66.3% 22.7% 17.3%1.8%146% 237% 8.1% Nature Center 38.5% 328% 140% 54% 328% 12.6% Famdranch Heritage Center 21.3% 401% 598% 12.7% 28.3% 60% Source: 2002 Citizen Survey The percentage of respondents attending these types of facilities in other cities is shown on Table 9.4.11. 9.4.16 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Table 9.4.11. Percentage of Respondents attending events in other Cities source: zwz u.Wen survey Figure 9.4.2. Compares citizen evaluation of park maintenance in 1997 and 2002. From these statistics, the Community feels that there has been a marked improvement in the maintenance of city parks. Figure 9.4.2. Citizen Rating of Park Maintenance 80.0% Attend leahtyst Other Mmes w Facility Deffnftelv Ukely Not Sure No Likely Never NoretumrGar0en 25.7% 318% 13.8% 18.6% 5.2% Outdoor Amphitheatre 14.6% 1 27.6% 21.1% 23.3% 70% Museum 17.1% 30.2% 17.9% 20.1% 73% ol(Course 14.4% 170% 10.8% 254% 24.3% eet Center 4.7% 12.0% 14.1% 330% 264% source: zwz u.Wen survey Figure 9.4.2. Compares citizen evaluation of park maintenance in 1997 and 2002. From these statistics, the Community feels that there has been a marked improvement in the maintenance of city parks. Figure 9.4.2. Citizen Rating of Park Maintenance 80.0% w `gg 60.0% d 40.0% 01997 p ■2002 2 200% S Excellent Good Ave age (very Gcad) Fair Poor x1997 10.5% 614% 00/ 236% 45% 02002 294% 47.1% 174% 30% 05% Source. Allen Citizen Surveys Citizen rating of the City's parks is shown on Figure 9.4.3. Figure 9.4.3. ClUzen Rating of City parks 60.0% p 40.0% E 20.0% m Y 0.0% a Above Below Average Average Average ONeighborh0od 274% 44.5% 40% Parks O Community Parks 409% 406% 24% ■Citywide parks 510% 270% 1.3% Source 2002 Chosen Survey 9.417 ghborhoo6 Parks mmumty Parks 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Respondent participation, including family, in the organized programs during the last two years is shown on Table 9.4.12. Table 9.4.12. Participation in Organized Programs Participation Last 2 Veers Yes No ISD Community Education 24.2% 75.8% 4ISD Summer Camps 15.1% 84a% Cry of Allen Parks Programs 189% 81 1% City of Allen Athletics 14.0% 860% Allen Spans Association 254% 74.6% Source 2002 Citizen Survey Priorities and Implementation Strategies. Priority: Establish a park and recreation system that meets recreational and open space needs of the entire community. Implementation Strategies: i. Continue development of floodplain land as greenbelts. ii. Preserve major wooded areas. Iii. Assess environmental impact in planning development and maintenance of park land. Iv. Incorporate private recreational and school facilities in planning to meet future needs. v. Continue to require dedication of park land and/or exactions from new residential development. vi. Continue to extend recreational and bicycle trails to link with bicycle routes, parks and greenbelts. vii. Continue to provide organized community recreation for youths, adults and senior citizens. Investigate alternative programming to address the needs of a larger segment of the community. viii. Sponsor initiatives to provide for families that cannot afford to pay for recreational earvlcee. ix Provide varied opportunities for both active and passive recreation. Priodty: Provide a high level of maintenance of park land and facilities. Implementation Strategies: i. Continue to develop standards for park maintenance with consideration of park type and needs of community. ii. Continue landscaping and beautification of parks and medians. Prlonty. Continue to foster cooperative partnerships with county and regional recreational interests. I. Seek completion of regional trail linkages within Allen. it. Continue to support private athletic activities. Priority. Provide safety and security in parks. Implementation Strategies: i Seek public safety department review of park design. ii. Coordinate park security with other city departments. 9.4.18 2002.2022 Comprehensive Plan 9.5. COMMUNITY FACILITIES 8 SERVICES Solid Waste Collection The City of Allen (City) contracts with a private waste collection firm for collection and hauling of solid waste. Solid waste is collected Monday through Friday, with the City being divided into five sections for waste collection. Each section has an assigned collection day, which includes trash, yard waste and recyclables. These are serviced on the same day. CWD collection services begin at 7:00 a.m. The sections also have one bulky waste day each month in which CWD collects up to five large items at each home. Examples of bulky waste are stoves, water heaters, washing machines, and furniture. Bulky waste does not include construction debris, regular household trash, dead animals, tree limbs or trunks, yard waste, or household hazardous waste. CWD and the City work closely with North Texas Municipal Water District (NTMWD), who is responsible for permanent solid waste disposal. The present landfill, located in McKinney, Texas, will be closed in 2003. A new landfill is envisioned to be opened in or near Melissa, Texas, after completion of the state permitting process. The new landfill has at least a 20 -year life expectancy Figure 9.5.1. Tons of Solid Waste Landfilled 50,000 40,000 20,000 - L L] 10,000 0 1997 1998 1999 2000 1 2001 ndfilled 21,454 24,496 28,314 33,462 430.3': 9.5.1 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Recycling Figure 9.5.2. Recycled Materials 2.500 0 2,000 a 1997 1998 1,500 V-- �Comminglcd 1,000 581 574 ♦ Newsprint 500 0 Per Household Recycling by Month 1997 1998 1999 �Comminglcd 312 581 574 ♦ Newsprint 940 1,645 1,826 �Tolal(Tons) 1,252 2,226 2,399 3,000 2,500 2,000 a 0 1,500 1,000 500 2000 20m 0 636 51 1,954 1,750 2590 2,415 Figure 9.5.3. Per Household Recycling by Month 4500 -. -- - - 40.00 _...- /^\` C� '`�—,997 �/ a --1998 2600 1999 20.00 2000 1500 —2001 1000 5 00 000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec The City's yard waste program recycles grass clippings, small brush and vegetation This green waste is hauled by CWD to Acme Materials at the intersection of Highway 121 and Custer Road to be composted. Completed compost is currently provided for pick-up by City residents at Jupiter Park Each resident may have two cubic yards for free each month. Christmas trees are collected each year after the holidays and chipped into mulch that is available at the compost center at Jupiter Park. In 2002, 2500 trees were chipped into 200 cubic yards of mulch for use by the residents. The City of Allen and CWD were awarded the Dallas Corporate Recycling Council 2001 Environmental Award for their outstanding curbside recycling program, as well as the Texas Corporate Recycling Council 2001 State Award for implementing the best green waste recycling program in Texas. Future initiative for green waste may include hauling these materials to the Custer Transfer Station to be chipped up and hauled to the new Melissa landfill to be composted as part of a NTMWD regional composting operation It is likely that after the start of this regional operation, the compost would then be sold to offset operating expenses. This is an important initiative that is intended to divert all yard waste materials from the new Melissa landfill as well as generate a marketable product that can be used to offset overall solid waste operating expenses. 9.5.2 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan The City is taking steps to begin an educational campaign to promote recycling of consumer materials, as well as yard waste, brush, cardboard, and other organic materials. A mandatory apartment/multi-family recycling project began in August 2000 to allow residents of the City with no access to the recycling program a way to divert their recyclables from the landfill. From August 2000 to February 2002, apartment recycling diverted over 70 tons of recyclables from the landfill. The recycling program accepts plastic bottles, numbers 1,2,3,4,5 and 7, aluminum cans, tin food and drink cans, and all colors of unbroken glass bottles and jars, as well as newspapers, phone books, magazines, catalogs, office paper and junk mail. A future initiative may include a more comprehensive cardboard recycling program in order to divert this very recyclable product from our landfill and promote a more environmentally friendly City. Environmental Education The City works closely with CWD and the Keep Allen Beautiful Board (KAB) to provide educational opportunities for Allen Independent School District students. The educational focus on environmental issues begins with the school year, when students are given book covers with an environmental theme. Classroom demonstrations and information follow this distribution, along with art contests in which students are awarded prizes from KAB. Each school year presents an opportunity to focus on one environmental subject that may affect students' quality of life. The 2001-2002 school year focused on recycling; 2002-2003 will focus on household hazardous waste. This very successful educational partnership will continue as the students take the environmental messages home. The educational campaign will profit tremendously when a future Learning Center is established to educate and promote environmental issues. The Learning Center will raise public awareness and change existing attitudes to promote an upward trend in recycling and environmental awareness. The future site of such a building is the primary concern. Suggestions have included a centralized location with space for gardens, composting, classes, and environmental projects. Projects that have been suggested are areas for hands-on learning (in and outside), butterfly/beneficial insect garden, solar -powered greenhouse, demonstration areas for water recovery, home composting, and source reduction. At present, a central location within the older part of the City has been suggested as a suitable site to develop the required outside educational areas. The site would have easy in and out access for buses and large vans. Wth future plans of the City to include renovation and revamping of the old downtown area, a centralized location would be an appropriate place to establish the Learning Center. Illegal Dumping Illegal dumping is addressed by cooperation within the City through the Code Enforcement Division, Police Department, and the Solid Waste and Drainage Divisions. The Solid Waste Division and Drainage Division have two maintenance workers that monitor historically used illegal dumpsites. These workers report illegal dumping activity as well as perform clean up when no information to prosecute is found. The Solid Waste staff works closely with the Collin County Constable's Office— Precinct 3 to investigate illegal dumping and prosecute illegal dumpers. In 2002, as of March, five cases of illegal dumping in Allen have been fled and successfully prosecuted. These consisted of approximately 200 pounds of trash. Other cases of approximately 1000 pounds of illegally dumped trash which did not contain any information that could be used to track the dumper were cleaned up but not prosecuted. Future initiatives may include adding City staff to focus entirety on litter and illegal dumping, as well as expanding the City's current contracted roadside litter collection efforts on US 75. Hazardous Waste To protect the quality of our drinking water, the environment, and quality of life, the City of Allen began a Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Pilot Program on February 1, 2002. This program was initially funded through the Solid Waste Fund for one year, from February 2002 to September 2002. Additionally, a grant was approved through the North Central Texas Council of Governments (COG) in 2002 that will fund this pilot program through September 2003. This will allow two years for the citizens of Allen to be educated in the reasons for implementing such a 9.5.3 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan program, become accustomed to using the program, and see the benefits to the environment and the City by having such a program. After the initial two cost-free years are over, City staff will propose that the program be funded through a small monthly fee of about $0.33 per household which will be collected through the utility bills. The City's HHW program currently operates in conjunction with the City of Piano's Reuse Center and HHW Program by Interlocal Cooperation Agreement (Agreement). This Agreement allows for processing, sorting and reuse of HHW at the City of Plano facility. Items suitable for reuse are issued free of charge to Plano and Allen residents at specified hours at the Reuse Center. The non -reusable HHW collected at the Plano Reuse Center is hauled to the proper disposal facilities by Worldwide Reclamation, Inc. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) monitors the disposal of any hazardous wastes. The HHW Pilot Program also reports to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). As the HHW program grows to meet the demands of the City, a City operated HHW Reuse Center will be built at the proposed Service Center to serve the needs of the City. At present, many industries within the City generate or handle industrial hazardous wastes. These industries are both self -monitored and permitted and monitored through the industrial pretreatment program to prevent industrial waste discharges into the sanitary sewer system. The City and NTMWD jointly operate the industrial pretreatment program subject to the regulatory oversight of the TCEQ The TCEQ has been renamed the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) effective September 1, 2002. The City has an emergency response plan for any hazardous waste spills or emergency situations that may arise at these industries. Citizen Surveys Citizen rating of garbage collection services show a significant change since 1997, although the rating in 1997 did not include "average" as a possible choice as shown in Figure 9.5.4. Figure 9.5.4. Citizen Rating Garbage Collection 600% 500% n 400% 30.0% c 200% 100% 8 00% y LL mj S 9 Q a' Collection of brush and Heavy Items shows similar improvement in Citizen perception as shown in Figure 9.5.5. Figure 9.5.5. Rating Brush & Large Item Pickup 450% $ 400% `0 35.0% n 30.0% 25.0%#M V1797 20.0% II�II�II`1I III�II�'l� X2002 15.0% S 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% � rg LL 9.5.4 2002.2022 Comprehensive Plan Priorities and Implementations Strategies Priority -Solid Waste: Continue to contract reliable, efficient, environmentally -minded waste hauling firm for solid waste and recycling collection services. Implementation Strategies: i. Continue to closely monitor current solid waste collection provider for compliance with City mandates and needs. ii. Continue to audit contractor and NTMWD solid waste tonnages. in. Continue to intercede on citizens behalf when disputes arise with the contracted waste provider. Priority -Recycling: Continue to provide recycling opportunities for the community in order to maximize the amount of material directed to reuse rather than going in the landfill. Implementation Strategies: i. Continue recycling programs for greenwaste and household paper, glass, metal, plastic and aluminum ii Improve citizen participation through educational and awareness campaigns. iii. Continue to monitor, educate and encourage apartment/multi-family recycling. V. Establish a more comprehensive cardboard recycling program in coordination with NTMWD. V. Work with NCTCOG to determine effective means to encourage business recycling. Priority -Environmental Education: Continue to provide educational opportunities to the citizens of the community through outreach programs, school education and contests, and hands-on learning opportunities. Implementation Strategies: Continue to conduct fall and spring environmentally based contests for Allen Independent School District (AISD) students. Continue to offer AISD leachers and students learning opportunities through educational programs offered through Keep Allen Beautiful and City staff. Establish a Learning Center to promote environmentally based educational opportunities Priority -Illegal Dumping: Continue to monitor and eliminate illegal dumping in the City of Allen and Collin County. Implementation Strategies. As the City grows, seek staff positions of dedicated illegal dumping personnel in order to more effectively address illegal dumping issues. Continue to work closely with law enforcement personnel to prosecute illegal dumping. Establish an illegal dumping education program for building and construction contractors as well as local and county law enforcement agencies. Illegal dumping prevention program will also benefit from an educational focus within the school system. Prionty-Hazardous Waste: Continue to divert household hazardous waste (HHW) from the waste stream. M161 2002-2022 Comprehenshre Plan Implementation Strategies: Establish an outstanding HHW program that educates citizens and operates in a manner that encourages residents to continue the program well into the future. Continue Interlocal Cooperation Agreement with Plano Reuse Center to process, sort, reuse and dispose of HHW. iii. When the City designs and builds a permanent City Service Center, construct a City HHW Reuse Center at the facility. Fwd 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan 9.6. Public Works Streets Street Conditions Street condition is evaluated based on six criteria (cracking, base condition, surface condition, drainage, distortion and ride quality) and ranked on a 5 point scale as follows: Excellent Good Fair - Minor repair scheduled Poor - Requires Major work Failed The aggregate scale for each street is a weighted average of these ratings. Percent Total 31% 2.7% 7.1% 17.6% 67.8% 100.0% While the majority of streets in new subdivisions and arterial roadways constructed within the last ten years are urban section roadways with curb and gutter, a few older neighborhoods have rural cross-section asphalt streets with bar ditches. The same is true for alleys in residential neighborhoods, which should also be considered an integral part of the local circulation system. Alleys connect into local streets, and provide access for residents, solid waste collection and utilities. Alleys are not been formally rated at this time, but will be in the future. Street Signs, Signals and Markings Traffic control devices, including street signs, traffic signals and pavement markings, notify road users of regulations and provide warning and guidance needed for the safe, uniform, and efficient operation of all elements of the traffic stream. The City follows the national guidelines outlined in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices for traffic control devices, including traffic signs, pavement markings, and traffic signals. All traffic control devices must fulfill a need; command attention, convey a clear, simple meaning; command respect of road users; and give adequate time for proper motorist response. The City has established inventory schedules for traffic signs, signals, street lights, disposal of household hazardous waste and school zone flashing lights. These inventory systems will be interactively implemented through GIS system. Response to emergency calls for troubled tragic signals and remediation of damaged signs and the replacement of faded slop/speed limit signs and markings are the first priority. Monitoring installation for new subdivisions and maintenance of existing traffic signals/signs/markings throughout the City is continuous, as is coordinating signal timing plans on major thoroughfares Drainage and Flood Control The City has established a Drainage Utility Fee to offset the costs of gutter repair, street sweeping and regular mowing of low lying and detention areas and to correct drainage issues. Heavily wooded areas along major streams are generally leg in a natural state for environmental reasons. The City's requirement for the dedication of the fully urbanized floodplain has permitted this policy without adversely impacting local drainage with a few exceptions. These exceptions are typically found in areas where development incorporated an active stream into residential lots. As urbanization has occurred, the natural erosion process has changed stream F&X Table 9.6.1. Street condition Rallm San ary Type 1.1.9 2-29 3-3.9 41.9 5 Total Arterial 000 083 2.49 33.41 101.98 138,71 Concrete Collector 000 1.39 4.68 15.25 69.18 9050 Local 0.00 0.00 10.61 55.30 198.97 26,183 Collector 248 295 4.08 109 0.00 1060 Asphalt Local 042 963 17.22 123 2.55 3105 Gravel 14.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.04 Total 16.94 148 39.08 106.28 372 68 549 78 Percent Total 31% 2.7% 7.1% 17.6% 67.8% 100.0% While the majority of streets in new subdivisions and arterial roadways constructed within the last ten years are urban section roadways with curb and gutter, a few older neighborhoods have rural cross-section asphalt streets with bar ditches. The same is true for alleys in residential neighborhoods, which should also be considered an integral part of the local circulation system. Alleys connect into local streets, and provide access for residents, solid waste collection and utilities. Alleys are not been formally rated at this time, but will be in the future. Street Signs, Signals and Markings Traffic control devices, including street signs, traffic signals and pavement markings, notify road users of regulations and provide warning and guidance needed for the safe, uniform, and efficient operation of all elements of the traffic stream. The City follows the national guidelines outlined in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices for traffic control devices, including traffic signs, pavement markings, and traffic signals. All traffic control devices must fulfill a need; command attention, convey a clear, simple meaning; command respect of road users; and give adequate time for proper motorist response. The City has established inventory schedules for traffic signs, signals, street lights, disposal of household hazardous waste and school zone flashing lights. These inventory systems will be interactively implemented through GIS system. Response to emergency calls for troubled tragic signals and remediation of damaged signs and the replacement of faded slop/speed limit signs and markings are the first priority. Monitoring installation for new subdivisions and maintenance of existing traffic signals/signs/markings throughout the City is continuous, as is coordinating signal timing plans on major thoroughfares Drainage and Flood Control The City has established a Drainage Utility Fee to offset the costs of gutter repair, street sweeping and regular mowing of low lying and detention areas and to correct drainage issues. Heavily wooded areas along major streams are generally leg in a natural state for environmental reasons. The City's requirement for the dedication of the fully urbanized floodplain has permitted this policy without adversely impacting local drainage with a few exceptions. These exceptions are typically found in areas where development incorporated an active stream into residential lots. As urbanization has occurred, the natural erosion process has changed stream F&X 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan configuration. Presently two areas represent a challenge: the first is located on Cottonwood Creek east of Greenville Avenue, and the second south of Exchange Parkway in Twin Creeks. Other drainage problems such as Mustang Creek and the Ridgemont Drive area either have been, or are in the process of correction: new development is required to provide erosion control and bank stabilization where appropriate. The City provides street sweeping on arterials and collectors on a regular basis. The National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) is expected to add requirements concerning public information and participation, once finalized the City's NPDES permit is approved by TCEO Priorities and Implementation Strategies, Priority: Preserve the City's investment in its infrastructure to maintain an average rating of 3.0 - 3.5. Implementation Strategies: i. Schedule 10% of streets for regular preventative maintenance on an annual basis. ii. Reconstruct asphalt pavement with concrete where pavement section fails. iii. Correct street drainage to preserve pavement. iv. Utilize GIS to maintain street condition rating information. V. Update 25% of all street rating information annually. vi. Develop alley rating data. Priority. Maintain street signs, signals and markers in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and prudent traffic management. Implementation Strategies: i. Establish a regular replacement schedule of 5% of street and traffic regulatory signs annually. ii. Maintain a street sign inventory. iii. Continue to improve signal timing plans on major thoroughfares. iv. Work with Allen Independent School District to improve pavement markings to provide safe pedestrian routes to schools. V. Establish signage criteria for designated bicycle routes. Priority Continue to plan for flood damage prevention and erosion control. Implementation Strategies: I. Review and implement the provisions of the Drainage Best Management Practices Manual currently under development by NCTCOG. ii. Implement NPDES permitting requirements. 9.6.2 2002.2022 Comprehensive Plan 9.7 Public Works Utilities General Water is supplied and wastewater treated by the North Texas Municipal Water District. The City is responsible for water distribution and wastewater collection. The City's goal is to maintain a Superior Water Supply rating from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. The residential buildout population for the City is estimated at 97, 938. Water Historical information on water consumption in the City is summarized in Table 9.7.1. Table 9.7.1. Water Consumption • Aug thm July in 000s of gallons Customer meters are set by City based on the type of usage and requirements of the customer. Table 9.7.2. shows the average number of meters by size during the twelve month period from December 1999 through January 2000 and the average annual consumption billed for each meter size and consumption per Living Unit Equivalent (LUE). Table 9.7.2. Customers and Average Consumption Size Purchased- HrO Billed' Customers Awe, 1989 1,022,862 771,333 6,190 10.465 1990 978,888 867,137 6,675 10.576 1991 934,047 860,232 6,890 10.404 1992 901,718 946,247 7,529 10.73 1993 1,025,975 1,019,704 8,316 10.218 1994 1,247,724 1,297,243 1 8,954 12.073 1995 1.44,542 1,391,269ill 0.58 25 1998 1,935,126 2,089,445409 532,821 2,240 1997 1,830,965 1,927,5852401998 3 16.0 57 2,453,416 2,505,4668481999 39.0 IM1 1.10 2,670,251 2,571,0142922000 L 12 102,0.08 3,331,824 2,947.9214842001 3.17 8' 50.0 3,952,728 3,419,629283 1 373361. .96 • Aug thm July in 000s of gallons Customer meters are set by City based on the type of usage and requirements of the customer. Table 9.7.2. shows the average number of meters by size during the twelve month period from December 1999 through January 2000 and the average annual consumption billed for each meter size and consumption per Living Unit Equivalent (LUE). Table 9.7.2. Customers and Average Consumption Size WEsI Mater Actual Meters Annual Usatte Actual LUES Average Annual Us 9LUE %Total Meters %consumption &a, 1.0 14,45 2,318.245 14,455 160.3 96.08% 7178 34• 1.5 26 3,856 38 102.8Z7 0.17% 012 1 . 2.5 125 102,792 313 nasm 0.83% 318 1.5* 5.0 Be78,838 440 179,177 0.58 2.M 7 8.0 280 532,821 2,240 237,887 1.86 16.49 3 16.0 57 912 39.0 038% 1.10 4• 25.0 L 12 102,0.08 3.17 8' 50.0 56 1 373361. .96 0.02 174 Totall 1 15044 3,230.7421 1884 171414 100.00 100.0 •DecemOer 19991hrough January 2000 in 000s gallons 9.7.1 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Table 9.7.3. shows the forecast levels of additional water consumption over the next ten years, assuming per household consumption remains at current levels. It is recommended that measures be considered to encourage additional water conservation, including an inclined block rate, penalties for over- irrigation, and incentives for xenscape. High levels of water consumption in Allen can be traced to landscape irrigation. Table 9.7.3. Ten Year Additional Consumption Forecast without Conservation Ten Year consumption 2002 2003 1 2004 1 2006 1 2008 I 2007 I 2008 1 2009 1 2010 1 2011 1 Total i le Famliv 291,994 557,371 794.924 975,762 1.143.553 1,280,903 1,390, 1,49037 1,564.3DO 1,818, 111111 1AW8-fami ]05] 298,322 d40,] 49405 494,0 494050 494,0 494,0 4940 494,0 4,270 NonResitlential 48,458 100]82 153,10 205431 258,01 312,857 38122 437,9 /96,83 551,33 2813, TOTAL 411,0 954,4 13927 1,8]5,24 1,89581 2,08],61 2,265,81 2,422 2,552,98 2,684, 18,324751 % 2.26% 5.21% 7.80% 9.19 10.34% 11.30% 123B% 13.22% 13.93% 14.51 100 In OOOs of gallons The City presently owns and operates the facilities shown on Table 9.7.4: Tale 9.7.4 Water DIstAxibon Fautities Pumps Rated (Mcrowem 8 1F g Storage D()ty MGon Stacy Road Pum Station 10 40 3 12 Custer Road Pump Slailm 5 19 1 8 Lucas Pump Station 3 4.5 1 2 Rov4e0 Elevated Stmage 1 2 Hillside Elevated Shane 1 0.5 Custer Road Elevated Sto e 1 1 Bethany Road Elevated Stara e 1 2 Trial1 18 635 5 4 25.5 source t:ammunny aemces uepartment The standard for distribution lines is a minimum of 8 inches for residential areas and 8 inches in commercial development to provide adequate fire protection. The size of trunk lines will vary depending on the size of the area to be served. Existing trunk lines may have additional capacity and are summarized on Table 9.7.5.. Major trunk line improvements which are anticipated are included in the Water Master Plan and summarized on Table 9.7.8. and 9.7.7. and shown on Map 9.7.1. The City should continue to charge impact fees to finance the infrastructure required to serve new development. 9.7.2 ��� \ \ \`� � �. ] �----. ..- �� . � %_�_ [ . � 4� . | - �; '�� �-©\ -- �y � ! .� ( k § � . § ) /�|� � ,•,., !!��| !� ( k § � . § ) a It !' a m• � a a a a a a a y 3 � � • � 3� y u y u �F �i FS m y � 3 � � � 'm 'm m' a L � • • m m � e a O 4i we 2 y F m 3 r `c_ A 0 � N W�• • W A V N fail ^� 0 'n S A • A W w A A A A A A• W A A A r w o y O o $ O e o S n O J + • g M p J i W � 6 D) q N W N W W W W W N W W P A O� •C C C W U V V O• p fWY N V V O q N W � P 0 N 0 N i d H c o N N N A • f•J (N� O fJ N 4N411 W qNq d• O N > Ay m+ qN mN WV �1 mA N WP p pV SNI SNI VO VV VN � ^ ry P•1 pq pq oq S N N '� de de de � 'd £, d F � � � � � i i a a � m m U N e N C U G U G U U N y QAQ O O m I R f l Q SS C C y n S R, o. n i s k im c 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 a t o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m s gg o g � r a a a a a a g jq J J u J� J J J J U q $ a a a a a a C ~ $ N .O � m T3 $ g T• e o LJ O S qq O O qq VV NN O Li: Q_ S O O O O O O i n S n O� m J W W N+ m mT A A J W CT Q q q y 1 1p W 01 m + + W W Up Wy�l W g W q. 8 00 (+J W 1 N W S W U V 41 m P ss m� WJ R m N O9 Y de de D' de de de de DQ iR ;;||||||`■!!!,m!!! ■,,,, . I.,-|.... � Oil #2AA - ■ : „ �!■ r:; ;:!§ § ( �£ i §! ■§i |§§ !!!!§ � ! !! §8i §§§i§| | |!! .■!■■!■ .,§!�`|�, ■■■■�` �|*!«!II■I� , � ! | «ot z �` k .E§!® l,,.,® m!. ■£ 2!5■!i ■§■E !§§§;k � . | I k ®|| _ ag � t�,-��»®,�-,!, ,■■ , ■\��,!!|�|||•-� |;� ||tt|| }� |�||I| MI a- \\K| 9, , ,§;l:;:3333;;;§;; � •'!lIzl'!!|;| �■ Ei. �; .,.,��.�. �� .;. ;�...,... ; ■i!! ■k§ ii 2343■§;;;! � ! ■ !■ ! ®�!!!i!;® _ lit I� p 3; � 3 D D D n m A A A A ➢➢ a m m mim aaaaa �,yy aaaaaa �„«'a='a> a a a a a a= e a Q m o m Q £ n £ Qy B � r S Z W S� N O P P fWil J N Y O d Y P O � Y �3 Y .. r A 0 o m + 1J A + N + N yO Sa a 00 m P S P W J fJ W_ N C_ N Q9 W N O N N Y q 6 4_1 A N q O y_ W q_ P+ O m W yy N ffJJ P W S N 'eR 'd F 'd dF m Y _Y N S S S S S S i 'Z 4 de de fJ de fJ A q " |||'¥!|((|||!| i|\E■� - ¥,,���`'�EE �`�E�;���■�, |'�((E■■ k -||\||(||§§/i;§| ! ■|■k�� |tf§~�| " E|•||I|; ; ! \ . | ` | �E ! E ! 2 E■ 2■ �� ` �§ ■§ �� �) !�� �iq ! 0.q j !k , ; 2 | ■ ■ | | !■ || | #■ 2 !| | | | | | !! |! |!!|!|||;;■:!»||(((� | " � ( |t|||I|§§§§r■■ „ �■■! III IE| �,■ |■■||(||!||•`�`��`�| § |,£�`!.||�|||| �|!| ■|| � ! . | | ! 2§ ■ ! �� ji �� !;§ ■§ ■; ■E � ! FL 2.0 3 X3 X3 C�$ gg 1' 1' ;� S p p; JillG m YYY 3' < �jpR A $S E O3 34 Fs 3Y $ E $ $ a ay r a m 3 5 sk^�^l4^ap;aaa; g fill Y. V W T C � r C 7 3g f v 0 ^.c 3 c C a $ nS e ec c m 0 m C ^n G m m �p U q 0 O qm P U N N mJ N J N$ 4 A Y B_ U N N P A A A p q m fAY 3 ||||����� �f|■m! | ||\!|| E } | b. k E � ! ■ ! ! ; | . ■ ; ! E| "« | § | | k | | | � ! 2 ! � � |`/``|!■(|!||`|° k m;\)|f||||| - !!!!,|!■;;| r | § | § % £ ( K !!§iiii 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Wastewater There are four major drainage basins within the planning area defined by natural topography. Wastewater flows generated from these basins reach the NTMWD sanitary sewer trunk lines at various locations through the City's major collection system, eventually reaching the NTMWD Wilson Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant. Data conceming the basin is summarized in Table 9.7.8. Population and employment forecast by basin is shown on Table 9.7.9. Table 9.79. Basin Summery Table 9.7 8. Wastewater Basin Data BASIN 2002 BASIN Area (Acres) ReskleMlal Office/Comnrerdal Publk/Seo i Public Industrial Greenbelt 8=^'ice Lines Rowlett Creek 3.997 2,881 548 292 23952 476 2x15' Wallen Branch 3256 909 1,270 231 361 485 2x15- Cottamwolcne 4331 1,653 1,747 820 114 197 15--21- Easl Men 5,011 3454 722 492 343 15--24- Population and employment forecast by basin is shown on Table 9.7.9. As a member of NTMWD, the City must contribute to system expansions. NTMWD projects in which the City will participate include expansion of the Wilson Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant, Phase 3 of the 60" —90" Rowlett/Cottonwood Creek Parallel Transfer Sewer, Phase 3 of the Upper Rowlett Creek Force Main and the 36 " Rowlett Creek Section III. City of Allen future wastewater facilities include the US 75 Lift Station and 12 inch Force main, the East Exchange Parkway Sanitary Sewer and the Ola Street 15 inch Sanitary Sewer, replacing an obsolete Irfl station. These projects are shown in Map 9.7.2. 9.7.15 Table 9.79. Basin Summery BASIN 2002 Build-out2022 Residential Populetbn Fnnploymenl Population Residential Population Employment Papulation Rowlelt Creek 14253 1,330 30]52 25206 Waders Branch 3,966 23952 10,721 63061 Cottonwood Creek 13174 31941 19212 76715 East Allen 293]7 9798 37253 36417 Total 80,]]0 6],021 9],938 201,119 As a member of NTMWD, the City must contribute to system expansions. NTMWD projects in which the City will participate include expansion of the Wilson Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant, Phase 3 of the 60" —90" Rowlett/Cottonwood Creek Parallel Transfer Sewer, Phase 3 of the Upper Rowlett Creek Force Main and the 36 " Rowlett Creek Section III. City of Allen future wastewater facilities include the US 75 Lift Station and 12 inch Force main, the East Exchange Parkway Sanitary Sewer and the Ola Street 15 inch Sanitary Sewer, replacing an obsolete Irfl station. These projects are shown in Map 9.7.2. 9.7.15 j L - l Y � � I �■ �. alarm■ �. Ij� �b l i I• ( I �r m k k ■ k I �[ f E$ $ f$ $ 9� Jn j g 3 Q O tD mmm � m1 �z 'sl zd8 $ 5a CO) z Y c 5 Zm � m I 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Priorities and Implementation Strategies. Priority: Reduce per capita water consumption to average per capita municipal usage for other cities within the Metroplex. Implementation Strategies: L Design water rate structure to reduce average and peak demand per capita. ii. Consider penalties for over -irrigation. iii. Create public awareness of xeriscape design alternative and provide incentives. V. Maintain a meter replacement program to replace 10% of residential meters annually. Priority. Maintain City's investment in existing infrastructure and meet demands of growth. Implementation Strategies: I. Implement Water and Wastewater Master Plans, updating as necessary. ii. Implement reliable current technology as it becomes available and cost effective. iii. Continue to utilize impact fees as a means of financing water and wastewater improvements. iv. Fund water and wastewater line replacement at 4% per year. 9.7.17 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan 9.8. Building Inspections 8 Code Compliance Building Inspections and Code Compliance operates under the direction of the Chief Building Official (CBO) The CBO reports directly to the City Manager. Building Inspection The Building Inspection Division provides service in areas such as permit processing, contractor licensing and registration, plan review and field inspection. Adoption of the nation's first common code format in 2002, known as the "International Codes' was an important step in the regulation of built environment. The International codes replace the three model codes, Uniform, Southern and BOCA, which have been utilized throughout the country since the 1920's. Energy conservation in building design and construction is a relatively new area of regulation which is expected to become more important as energy conservation awareness increases. At this time, the Department has three building inspectors who also perform electrical inspection for residential, three plumbing and mechanical inspectors and one commercial electrical inspector. At this point in the city's development, it is unlikely that additional inspectors will be needed, since the city is beginning the natural transition from the regulation of new construction to the maintenance of existing buildings and premises. Single- family permit activity is expected to decrease over the next three years as land for new development becomes more limited. One aspect of this natural change is the multi -family licensing and inspection program has been identified by the City Council as a strategic goal commencing in 2003. Apartment complexes will be inspected annually or semi-annually as a condition of licensing to assure compliance with a minimum housing code, which will also be adopted as early as 2003. Inspections will likely include building, plumbing, mechanical, electrical, fire and health inspectors. Code Enforcement Activity in the code enforcement division is rapidly increasing. Area cities typically employ one code enforcement officer for each 13,000 to 15,000 citizens. This level of staffing allows for proactive enforcement in highly visible areas and reactive, complaint based service to other areas. Between five and six thousand new single-family units will be added in the next five years. As neighborhoods age, more proactive enforcement will be necessary deeper within subdivisions. In addition to an increase in property maintenance violations, zoning violations such as illegal uses and home occupations will grow. The department currently employs three officers and more will be needed in the near future in order to fulfill the Council's strategic goal of enhancing the overall appearance of the City through proactive enforcement of property maintenance codes. Code enforcement officers will also be involved in property maintenance and minimum housing code enforcement for multi -family licensing. Environmental Health Existing functions of the Health Division continue to increase as new facilities such as restaurants, schools, day care centers, public and semi-public swimming pools, and mobile food vendors open. Average restaurant scores have increased from 92 to 95 since 1998. In order to maintain excellent scores, a food handler safety program approved by the city is desirable for all persons who handle food in an establishment. A certification is already in place for managers for such establishments. The Environmental Health Division is likely to become more active in broader health and sanitation functions as the city grows. It is anticipated that the City will become involved with mosquito surveillance and control as issues such as West Nile Virus become more prevalent. Priorities and Implementation Strategies Priority: Maintain building and code inspectional services at levels which assure the continued health and safety of the citizens. Implementation Strategies: L Maintain adequate staffing of inspection and enforcement. Plans Examiners to obtain certification in the International Energy Conservation Code 9.8.1 2002-2022 Comprehensive plan iii. Building inspectors to obtain certification in the International Energy Conservation Code as required by state law to perform energy inspections currently performed by third party inspectors. Priority: Prepare for transition of the inspection function from new development to a maintenance emphasis as structures within the city age. Implementation Strategies: L Adopt a Minimum Housing Code to address deterioration of aging structures. ii. Adopt a multi -family licensing ordinance to facilitate an inspection program. iii. Amend the masonry requirement for new residential structures by requiring 75% masonry (excluding openings). iv. Require the use of low maintenance, durable veneers in residential construction. Priority: Maintain excellent health inspection scores in all facilities through application of the most current regulations, recognition of appropriate staffing levels, and staff development as the number of facilities increase. Implementation Strategies: I. Monitor health inspection workload and add staff in order to limit each inspector to an appropriate number of inspections per day. it. Require a food handler's certification for everyone who handles food within an establishment. iii. Re -assess Environmental Health Ordinance on a regular basis and amend to include various updates in State law and other areas of local public health concern. 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan 9.9. LIBRARY AND THE ARTS Library The Allen Public Library was established in 1967. The library has been at four locations, the first being the Woodmen of the World building on Main Street, the former Central Fire Station, then the senior citizen's building at 102 N. Allen Drive. The current 20,000 square foot facility will be replaced in 2004 with a new 54,000 square foot facility located on North Allen Drive between Coats and St. Mary Drive, and will include an auditorium. A free library card is provided to all Allen residents with proof of residency. The Library collaborates with the Plano Public Library for automated services. The library catalog contains the holdings of Allen, Plano and the Collin County Community College librades. In addition to loaning books, audio and videocassettes, and music Figure 9 9 1 on compact discs, educational and informational Library Activity programming for all ages, including special children's programming is available. Internet access and office software is available to library 400.000 patrons, and meeting rooms may be scheduled 350,000- by non-profit and civic groups. 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 1013,900 50,000 0 Visits to the library Items checked out 01993 019% 02001 The Library hosts a monthly musical series during the fall and winter months and in conjunction with the Allen Arts Alliance is expected to expand cultural activities following the opening of the new auditorium. Program activity at the Allen Public Library is shown on Table 9.9.1.. Table 9.91. Library Activity The adopted standards, Texas Library Association Standards and Guidelines for Texas Public Libraries, are currently under revision and will be considered for approval as revised at the Texas Library Association Conference in Dallas in 2002. The existing standards and how they compare to the Allen Public Library are listed below: Table 9.9.2. Library Rating Criteria 1993 1998 2001 rogrem akentlance 9,433 12,825 14,40 Reference transactions 6.968 14,053 31,]2 n -library materials Use N/A 60.080 101,47 interr-0brary Loan Transactions 180 439 191 en id cal Subscriptions 12 13 15 The Library hosts a monthly musical series during the fall and winter months and in conjunction with the Allen Arts Alliance is expected to expand cultural activities following the opening of the new auditorium. Program activity at the Allen Public Library is shown on Table 9.9.1.. Table 9.91. Library Activity The adopted standards, Texas Library Association Standards and Guidelines for Texas Public Libraries, are currently under revision and will be considered for approval as revised at the Texas Library Association Conference in Dallas in 2002. The existing standards and how they compare to the Allen Public Library are listed below: Table 9.9.2. Library Rating Criteria Source Texas Library Association Standards and Guidelines for Texas Public Libraries 9.91 Adequate Superior Allen Public Library Hourst eek 60 72 61 Library Resources 2/capita 4/capita 1.9/cepita Minimum Space Requirements (.75 s I fl/capita) 41,250 N/A 20,000 54,000 (2004) staffing FTEs 1/2,000 pop. 27.5 1.5/2000 pop 36.6 1/2,933 pop 1875 Source Texas Library Association Standards and Guidelines for Texas Public Libraries 9.91 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Library Volumes 120,000 1.98 100.000 0 1.94 'w 80,000 1.92 0 a 60,000Iso g 40,000 1.88 20,000 1.86 B 0 0 1.84 > 1993 1996 2001 Library Volumes 120,0005.00 i 100,000 d.00 c p 3.00 3 40.000 n . 200 20,000n 0 00on 1993 1996 2001 The Arts Philharmonic Symphony 7Volumes Per 000 Populafian o Volumes +PerCardholder The Library has had some difficulty in increasing the size of its collection to meet State standards on a per 1,000 population as shown in Figure 9.92.. It has been successful in maintaining a relatively constant number of volumes per cardholder as shown in Figure 9 9.3. Figure 9.9.2. Volumes/1,000 Population Figure 9.9.3. Volumes/1,000 Library cardholders The Allen Philharmonic Symphony Orchestra comprises 70 professional musicians led by conductor and music director Chris Xeros'. The orchestra performs on selected Saturday evenings at 8:00 p.m. at the Becky Lowery Freshman Center Auditorium at 601 E. Main Street at Jupiter Road. Season tickets are reasonably priced and available in both preferred and open seating sections. Discounts are available for families and groups, as well as students and seniors. The symphony has been in operation for five years The symphony relies upon the financial support of its patrons. Gifts from generous individuals, businesses, and organizations help fund all aspects of the music enjoyed by the community through the orchestra's performances. Programs offered during the 2002-2003 season included Autumn Overture with featured guest artist Dr Isodor Saslav, Violin; Home for the Holidays featuring the Allen Symphony Chorus; Prelude to Spring with featured r Mr Xeres was born and educated in Dallas, Texas. He attended the Juilliard School of Music, Colorado University, University of Texas at Austin, and earned his Bachelor of Music and Master of Music Education degrees from the University of North Texas He also attended L'Ecole Monteaux in Hancock, Maine. He began his career as a professional violinist and violist with the Chattanooga Symphony, and as an instructor in charge of string pedagogy in the city schools Soon afterward, Mr Xeros returned to the DFW area to teach strung/orchestra in the Dallas Independent School District. He held this post for thirty-five years, winning state and national orchestra honors in 1973 and 1974. In 1962, he founded the well- respected and widely recognized Richardson Symphony Orchestra, and conducted this orchestra for thirty years. Several were conduced at the Morton H. Meyerson Symphony Center. Mr. Xeros was honored by the Sigma Alpha Iota Music Sorority in 1985 for "Outstanding Contributions for Great Music in the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex' In 1990, the University of North Texas Music Division selected Mr. Xeros as an honored alumnus who has made an 'Outstanding Service to Music." nwe 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan guest Dr. Anthony Brittin, French Hom; and Let it "B" which featured a compendium of works by composers whose names start with "B,- ranging from Bach to The Beatles, Symphony Choir The Allen Symphony Chorus was organized in the fall of 2001 to add another dimension to the symphonies repertoire as well as giving singers in the Allen area an opportunity to share their talents. The responsibilities of the chorus have been to join with the symphony on the December concert as well as the Allen U.S.A. July 4th Celebration. In the future the chorus will become a more integral part of the musical resources in this area where they will sing with the symphony and on special occasions give full concerts by themselves Auditions are usually held in the fall of each year. Arts Alliance The Allen Arts Alliance was originally formed as a result of a "Leadership Allen" class project. It was established in 1999, and is composed of seven members. Their background experience includes a vocal performer, an actress, a librarian, an attorney, an information specialist, and a self-employed business owner. The variety of backgrounds has proven valuable in their attempt to maintain their mission statement The mission statement is "To promote, nurture, and celebrate the arts in the City of Allen in such a way that it offers a variety of avenues to enhance the experience of living here." The Alliance budget has included such activities as AIIen USA (a Fourth of July celebration), an art tent for children to "make and take" crafts. Last year over 4000 children participated in this activity TheAllen Symphony has received funds through the Arts Alliance, as well as "Summer Sounds," a free summer evening concert series that runs from May until the end of June. Another concert series is the "Sunday Sounds" project which includes a library concert series offering cultural music and storytelling. The Arts Alliance has provided funds to Allen's elementary schools for the purpose of purchasing unique supplies to enrich student's art education. Future events include a "Heart for Art" event that will encourage the community to give new and gently used art supplies to local schools. A contest was held to solicit a mural to be painted at the new Natatorium The Arts Guild supports the Allen Arts Alliance, with over 100 members volunteering to help with activities within the City. They have plans for a "little theater' and other performing groups. They research grants and support Ablest, the concert series, and the school projects. The Guild and the Alliance, working together, have a passion to bring art to the people of Allen. The Alliance vision includes a need for performance facilities They are supportive of a facility that the surrounding cities could operate together. Many of the programs that the Alliance would like to offer are not possible at this time because there is not a facility large enough to accommodate the performances or the audience Arts of Collin County The Arts of Collin County is a group of citizens representing the Cities of Plano, Allen, Frisco, and McKinney, in an attempt to provide an art facility that would serve all four communities in Collin County. Their vision statement is: "The Arts of Collin County will create an environment where all citizens can share and enjoy in the full diversity and vitality of the arts." They are committed to: • supporting and nurturing non-profit art groups • understanding the needs of arts patrons; • collaboration in arts education • developing a arts facility recognized for its distinctive appearance and outstanding functionality as well as its ability to promote the arts The Arts of Collin County group is recommending a multi -form facility that can accommodate Collin County - based arts organizations as well as high quality touring programs. This would suggest a hall with a maximum rapacity of 2,100 seats that can be sized to 1,200 seats to accommodate smaller users. Their recommendation also includes a 550- to 600 -seat multipurpose hall, two large, multipurpose rehearsal/performance spaces with capacities up to 200, a visual arts gallery; support spaces, including practice rooms, offices, classrooms, 9.9.3 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan catering kitchen, box office and storage, informal outdoor facilities, parking, and an 80- to 100 -acre site with infrastructure and landscaping. After exploring a range of options for the type and site of the location of the proposed facility, the Committee recommended a park -like setting as being most able to accommodate future growth and present the type of project envisioned by the four communities. They have indicated that a site of 80 to 100 acres would successfully isolate the facilities from adjacent land uses, provide ample parking and space for future facilities, and set the arts hall in a naturalistic setting befitting a centerpiece project for Collin County. Citizen Surveys Respondent annual participation in Arts and Community functions is illustrated on Table 9.9.3. Table 9.9.3. Annual Participation in Arts and Community Functions Source 2002 Citizen Survey Priorities and Implementation Strategies. Priority: Provide adequate library space and resources for the community. Implementation Strategies: i. Provide facilities that meet current space requirements and are capable of expansion as future needs require. ii. Continue to develop library collections to meet standards. in Work with Arts Alliance to build music, drama, and visual arts collections. V. Develop bilingual collection for ESL population. V. Strengthen and expand the collections for children, youth, teens and the caregivers of children. vi. Strengthen popular and audiovisual collections and services. vii. Focus on offering reference and information services electronically. Priority. Define and increase outreach services with a focus on service populations who need and desire these services. Implementation Strategies: I. Plan for space for outreach staff as well as programming activities. ii Establish and maintain cooperative partnerships with schools, departments, senior center, social service agencies, Arts Alliance, and area museums. iii. Explore library's role in economic development activities with the City of Allen. Priority: Work on keeping the library continually visible to the community. Implementation Strategies. I. Develop a marketing and public relations plan for the library. ii. Add staff with special skills to support this effort iii Program library space for functions that make the library an inviting, accessible and flexible environment. 9.9.4 1-3 1 3-5 1 5-10 1 Over 10 Never Os Fundion 18.8 4.3 1.6 0.9 ]2 ]% ommunity Fundion 31.3 6.8 2.8 0.8 565% Source 2002 Citizen Survey Priorities and Implementation Strategies. Priority: Provide adequate library space and resources for the community. Implementation Strategies: i. Provide facilities that meet current space requirements and are capable of expansion as future needs require. ii. Continue to develop library collections to meet standards. in Work with Arts Alliance to build music, drama, and visual arts collections. V. Develop bilingual collection for ESL population. V. Strengthen and expand the collections for children, youth, teens and the caregivers of children. vi. Strengthen popular and audiovisual collections and services. vii. Focus on offering reference and information services electronically. Priority. Define and increase outreach services with a focus on service populations who need and desire these services. Implementation Strategies: I. Plan for space for outreach staff as well as programming activities. ii Establish and maintain cooperative partnerships with schools, departments, senior center, social service agencies, Arts Alliance, and area museums. iii. Explore library's role in economic development activities with the City of Allen. Priority: Work on keeping the library continually visible to the community. Implementation Strategies. I. Develop a marketing and public relations plan for the library. ii. Add staff with special skills to support this effort iii Program library space for functions that make the library an inviting, accessible and flexible environment. 9.9.4 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan iv. Make the library's Internet capability, capacity and Web site as important to its visibility as traditional activities. Become a destination place for those seeking enrichment opportunities by developing an ongoing series of entertaining and cultural programs. Priority: Encourage the development of the visual and performing arts in Allen and Collin County i. Cooperate with regional efforts to construct a center for the visual and performing arts H. Encourage the endeavors of local artists and performers and groups. iii. Require public art within all local government projects. Priority: Support community access to the arts Continue the "Summer Sounds" and Philharmonic Symphony series in conjunction with the Public Library and the Department of Parks & Recreation. Provide exposure to local performers and artists through public access programming 9.9.5 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan 9.10. SOCIAL SERVICES Social services are important in maintaining a high quality of life in the City of Allen,. To address the needs of the citizens, Allen has all the necessary organizations available including the Ministerial Alliance, the Allen Community Outreach program, the Senior Citizen programs, and such State support services as the State Attorney General's Child Support Office and the Texas Workforce Commission. Some service functions are met through Collin County with programs such as Hope's Door (Women's Shelter) and the Samaritan Inn. Allen Community Outreach The Allen Community Outreach (ACO) mission is to improve the quality of life through the provision of basic necessities, specialized programs, and independent living skills for families in need. ACO serves the communities of Allen, Fairview, and Lucas. Emergency assistance includes help with rent and utilities, food and clothing, job placement, assistance referral and counseling. Holiday programs benefit families, and school supplies are distributed to more than 180 children. The "Care & Share" Program collects and distributes supplies not available at the Food Pantry. In 2001, 3,483 unduplicated clients were assisted, with 97% of those residing in the Allen community. Citizen volunteers number over 750, with 12,931 hours given to the community during the past year. The following list of services were documented during the 2001 year: • Information & referral 9,187 calls • Rent and Utilhy Assistance 814 • Job Bank Counseling/Placement 90 • Meals -on -Wheels Delivered 5,440 • Individuals screened for food & clothing 3,443 • Client Clothing Vouchers Redeemed 249 families • Children assisted with day care 41 Information and Referral Information & Referral is a primary channel of access to human services in the local community, and an essential community link between people who need services and those who provide them. When in doubt as to where to turn for assistance, ACO's Information and Referral answered 9,187 calls and served 3,483 unduplicated clients in 2001 — up 14% from 2000 (3,358). Clients are often referred to other agencies for additional assistance such as Consumer Credit Counseling, Texas Workforce, Texas Rehabilitation, Lifepath/Northstar Mental Health Services, WIC, Child Care Management, Avenue Counseling, AIDS Services of North Texas, CITY House, Legal Services of North Texas, Visiting Nurses Association, and Turning Point (formerly known as the Rape Crisis Center of Collin County. Client Emergency Assistance with Rent and Utilities ACO provides confidential counseling through an interview with an ACO professional social worker. In 2001, ACO assisted 814 families with rent and utilities assistance — an increase of 20% from 2000 (680). Food and Clothing The Food Pantry In cooperation with the Allen Ministerial Alliance, the Allen Food Pantry is available to families in need of grocery items. ACO provides vouchers for families to pick up a month's supply of food items. The Food Pantry is located at St. Jude's Catholic Church, 1515 N. Greenville Ave. The ACO Upscale Resale Store The ACO Upscale Resale Store grew out of the clothes closet and opened in 1998, The Resale Store offers a service to families in need by providing a place to "shop" for necessities. Vouchers 9.10.1 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan are given to help needy families maybe spent as cash at the ACO Upscale Resale Store located at 801 Main Street (vouchers must be obtained at the ACO office located at 301 W. Boyd). In 2001, 3443 individuals were screened for food and clothing, an increase of 27% from 2000 (2,721). 249 clients redeemed clothing vouchers. Job Placement and Counseling ACO keeps an updated job bank featuring current listings of employment opportunities. Seminars, presentations, and printed materials are also available to help with job counseling, resume writing, job applic dJons, interview skills, job training, and more. In 2001, ACO assisted 90 individuals with job counseling and placement. Affordable Day Care Assistance Proceeds from the ACO Upscale Resale Store have been used to match funds from Texas Workforce Commission to provide affordable daycare for qualified single parents who are working. Holiday Programs Thanksgiving Bread Baskets Thanksgiving boxes are filled with all of the items needed for a traditional Thanksgiving dinner. Children in the community first decorate hundreds and hundreds of boxes. As the boxes are delivered, so are cans and dry good items collected from businesses, churches, and community groups. Christmas Adopt a Child or Senior Area families, individuals, and businesses adopt children, teens, and seniors at Christmastime to -play Santa- and buy items from their wish lists. Gifts purchased are returned to ACO, wrapped by volunteers and given out a week before Christmas. In 2001, 505 individuals were given Christmas gifts. Meals -On -Wheels 8 More ACO's Meals -On -Wheels and More Program serves the homebound residents of Allen, Fairview, and Lucas. Traditionally the Meals -On -Wheels program throughout the area is to serve seniors over the age of 60 who cannot get out to shop or cannot prepare their own meals at home. A wane, nutritious lunch is delivered by a volunteer each weekday around noon. Specially packaged heat -and -eat meals are delivered prior to holidays. ACO's -More' part of the program includes individuals younger than 60, who for whatever reason are homebound or limited in their ability to care for themselves. In 2001, 5,440 meals were delivered. F& Up/Clean Up Projects When a family in need comes to ACO asking for help, volunteers join together to perform minor repairs and maintenance. Volunteer Visitor Program This program offers families and individuals some quality time with a Senior who enjoys a visit and special attention. Youth Scholarships Summertime brings opportunities for children to participate in recreational and education programs and ACO offers scholarships in conjunction with the City of Allen and its summer youth programs to benefit area children whose families cannot afford these programs. Facility Use at ACO There are a number of activities that take place at the ACO offices each month such as low cost immunizations provided by the Collin County Health Department. Allen Community Alliance 9.10.2 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Under the direction of Allen Community Outreach, in 2002 the City of Allen, the Allen Independent School District, the Allen Ministerial Alliance, the Allen Chamber of Commerce and the Allen Community Outreach signed an agreement formalizing the relationship and commitment to working together when resolving human service issues. The Alliance will provide a seamless system of community services as the community prepares for the city's build out. Each entity is committed to meet as a group when issues arise and to pool resources as needed. Allen Ministerial Alliance The churches of Allen have combined in an Alliance to support the social needs of the community. They have sponsored the Food Pantry since 1986 and sponsor special programs for Thanksgiving and Lent and a monthly luncheon for the senior citizens group. In 2001, 2,649 individuals were assisted. During January through April of 2002, the Alliance had assisted 400 families. At this time, the Alliance is meeting once each month at St. Jude's Catholic Church. State Attorney General (Allen Child Support Office) The Allen office of the State Attorney General supports child support services within Collin, Denton, Rockwall, Cook and Kaufman Counties. They have over 8,500 open rases in these counties, and disperse one million dollars per month in child support. Their responsibility includes child support orders, medical support orders, and modification of existing court orders. Collin County Committee on Aging The Collin County Committee on Aging serves all of Collin County, including Allen, Celina, Frisco, Plano, Farmersville, Princeton, and McKinney. They provide Meals on Wheels as well as an information and referral caregiver support program. The Meals on Wheels program prepared and packages meals for lunchtime delivery. Hot lunches are delivered to approximately 425 persons each weekday to eligible seniors age 60 and older. This agency offers CCart_an area transit system for all citizens needing the service with a fixed route in McKinney. Service is also available to all of Collin County on an as -call basis. The cost is $4.00 per ride, or by donation if the client Is over 60 years of age. Samaritan Inn The Samaritan Inn is the only homeless shelter serving all of Collin County. Currently they can accommodate 58 individuals in private beds. The average length of stay is 30 days. Life skill classes are conducted, as well as prayer groups (non -denominational). The Inn has recently purchased a facility from Collin County and plans are being made for the renovation of the building. Once occupied, The Inn will be able to help 116 persons. Computers, and internet services will be available for the adults and children to utilize. There will be a library, play rooms for the children, and a private chapel. Programs are in place to help prevent homelessness and assistance after a resident leaves the program. Every person who seeks assistance is dealt with on an individual basis. The Samaritan Inn is primarily funded through donations, but it is also part of The United Way of Collin County. The goal of The Inn is to help provide a clean, safe place for individuals and families facing the crisis of homelessness and help them return to their conventional lifestyles. Texas Workforce Commission The Texas Workforce Commission maintains an office within the City of Allen. They include support programs such as training for youth, Experience Works (a program for workers over 55 that pays a minimum wage to train in actual work places), the Workforce Investment Act (WIA), that assists persons in finding employment and is funded through the Department of Labor, the Trade Adjustment Act (TAA), a program for workers who were laid off due to jobs being exported, and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). 9.10.3 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan The Allen office serves residents in Allen, Plano and a portion of Frisco. They have served a total of 18,188 persons, and have stated that 4,417 persons obtained employment after receiving services through the office. Senior Citizens Senior Citizens are supported through the City of Allen Parks Department and the Collin County Committee on Aging. They enjoy a monthly luncheon that is sponsored by various private groups. The groups enjoy such activities and programs as a monthly newsletter, monthly luncheons, and workshops on financial and medical topics, art and craft classes, trips and social events. Hope's Door Hope's Door is the only domestic abuse shelter for women in Collin County. It was established in 1985. to offer safe shelter to victims of abuse through the use of community, hotels and its 24-hour crisis line. Since March of 1989 when a permanent facility was established, Hope's Door has provided safe shelter for over 3,486 abused women and their children, and received over 15,703 calls regarding family violence. Currently, Hope's Door provides emergency shelter, food, clothing and other essentials for abused women and their children for up to thirty (30) days. Hope's Door also provides counseling, support and referrals during the shelter stay. Group counseling is provided for victims of abuse who do not need shelter. The shelter includes a 19 -bed emergency facility and operates a 24-hour crisis line. Perpetrators of abuse also utilize the services of Hope's Door. The Battering Intervention and Prevention Program provides intensive specialized group counseling to batterers. During fiscal year 2000-2001, Hope's Door responded to 1,159 calls regarding family violence and housed 301 women and children. Citizen Survey The 2002 Citizen Survey made a particular effort to solicit opinions on social services. Only 45% of respondents know the types of programs operated by Allen Community Outreach. Of these, 27% rated their satisfaction with the work of ACO as "Superior" or "Better than Average; with an additional 11.3% ranking ACO as "Average" Respondent ranking of programs which are needed is illustrated on Table 9.10.1. Table 9.10.1 Priorities and Implementation Strategies Source: 2002 Ci9zen Survey 9.10.4 Yes No Noo Inbn mhol8 Chemical Abuse 49.8% 20.3% 24.0 eenageNeeds 81.8% 13.5 199 Ie Mull Programs 30.0% 34.3% 29.3 'amily Counseling SeMces 55.5% 17.2% 21.9 ental lieallh P rams 461% 22.7% 24.9 hildcare and Latch key rams 59.0% 15.6% 19.8 enior Citizen P rams 59.8% 14.1% 20.8 Unemployment P rams 49.1% 22.5% 22.1 sordable Hwei P rams 38.1% 35.0% 22.5° Lilerac r rams 1 52.8% 20.9% 19.9 Priorities and Implementation Strategies Source: 2002 Ci9zen Survey 9.10.4 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Priori : Assist the community in making high quality social services available for the residents of Allen. Implementation Strategies: I. Provide information and support to all private agencies and individuals in order to meet the human service needs of our community. it. Publish information regarding the services available in appropriate City publications. iii. City representation and coordination of efforts and participation through the Allen Community Alliance. iv. ACO and the City to partnering toward the improvement of older Allen neighborhoods using Community Development Block Grants. v. Partnering with ACO, CDC, and AEDC to educate the business community about ACO and the opportunities for employees to participate in volunteer programs, service opportunities, monthly 'Cara & Share" drives, and special events. City management to participate in the ongoing computer recycling program with Software Etc., along with job bank participation, and pro bono services to better service ACO clients. vi. Partnering to address issues regarding transportation for seniors. vii. Continue to collaborate with ACO and the City Parks & Recreation to assess and address the recreational needs and child care programs in ACO's service areas. 9.10.5 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan 9.11 EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES & SERVICES The City of Allen is located within four school districts: the Allen Independent School District (AISD), McKinney Independent School District (MISD), Lovejoy Independent School District (LISDS) and the Plano Independent School District (PISD). School age children living within the boundaries of these districts attend schools provided by the Districts. Children living in LISD also attend grades 7-12 In AISD schools. There is no residential development located in the portion of MISD that is within the city of Allen. In 2003 residents in LISD and AISD decided against the consolidation of the school districts, although students within LISD are expected to attend Allen schools until LISD is able to offer its own middle and high school curriculum. The location of existing and proposed AISD schools, as well as schools serving Allen residents located In the Lovejoy Independent School District and Plano Independent School District are shown on Map 9.11.1. Plano Independent School District (PISD) PISD is a relatively mature school district with three high schools. Beverly Elementary is a TEA Recognized Elementary School located in southwest Allen north of Hedgcoxe Road These students move to Hendrick Middle School in Plano. Allen Independent School District (AISD) AISD is a Texas Recognized School District, with an Exemplary rating by the Texas Education Agency (TEA) for all schools. Table 9.11.1. shows school enrollments and forecast. Districts seldom get an overall rating of Exemplary, even though every school has an exemplary individual rating, since a rating of Exemplary in every subcategory is required. Table9.11.1 AISDEnrollment AISD currently operates ten elementary schools, two middle schools, a Freshman Center and one high school, as well as a Special Achievement Center. Forecasts indicate a need for eight new elementary and three additional middle schools located in Allen. One additional elementary school will be located in the City of McKinney. Early designation of school sites helps to ensure adequate access and traffic circulation, as well as minimizing development costs. The Board of Trustees for AISD ratified the following site selection criteria in November 2001: 1. School sites should not be located on major thoroughfares; 2. Elementary school sites should be adjacent to a neighborhood park, if a park is required; 3. If a Middle School site is to be located adjacent to a park site, the park site should be an active park and not a passive park that contains a large number of trees and creeks; 4 Elementary schools should be a minimum of 14 acres if the site is rectangular, larger sites are required if the site is irregular in shape. The site should be large enough to provide adequate parking; 5 Middle school sites should be a minimum of 28 acres for middle schools if the site is rectangular, and larger if an irregular shape. The site should be large enough to provide for adequate field space for various outdoor activities and adequate parking; 9.11.1 1998 2001 200 lementary(K-8) 4,850 5,821 7,38 Secondary (7-12) 4,158 5,979 9,22 Total 8,806 11,800 16, 60 Source'. AISD- - Includes LISD AISD currently operates ten elementary schools, two middle schools, a Freshman Center and one high school, as well as a Special Achievement Center. Forecasts indicate a need for eight new elementary and three additional middle schools located in Allen. One additional elementary school will be located in the City of McKinney. Early designation of school sites helps to ensure adequate access and traffic circulation, as well as minimizing development costs. The Board of Trustees for AISD ratified the following site selection criteria in November 2001: 1. School sites should not be located on major thoroughfares; 2. Elementary school sites should be adjacent to a neighborhood park, if a park is required; 3. If a Middle School site is to be located adjacent to a park site, the park site should be an active park and not a passive park that contains a large number of trees and creeks; 4 Elementary schools should be a minimum of 14 acres if the site is rectangular, larger sites are required if the site is irregular in shape. The site should be large enough to provide adequate parking; 5 Middle school sites should be a minimum of 28 acres for middle schools if the site is rectangular, and larger if an irregular shape. The site should be large enough to provide for adequate field space for various outdoor activities and adequate parking; 9.11.1 v gg ..� � A i � � $ O. � y � G O f � N O � � [? Fi O i G �� w �� F 1] ° � � y �. ���g�����g � � �� � p D 4 n r r m z � N_ 0 3 * ��` s �� z � z m * N � O m r Ii r ;; O eS a 9 �A � D_r• N - ao�ll a 0 0 0 N 0 0 N O N O L A m m e 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan 6. Sites should be located in close proximity to storm drainage, water, and sanitary sewer connections; 7. Sites should have topography that maximizes land utilization and safety, and minimizes development costs; 8. Sites should be located on collector streets to enhance both pedestrian and vehicular traffic circulation; 9. Sites should not be located next to alleys that would back to the sides of the school site. This discourages student foot traffic in alleyways; 10 Each school site should have two points of public access. In addition to state required curriculum, ASID provides the following programs: • Head Start —A comprehensive developmental program for children ages three and four whose families meet federal income guidelines • Pre -Kindergarten - A comprehensive developmental program for children age four whose families meet federal income guidelines and/or have limited English speaking proficiency. 93% of current participants do not speak English. • Parents As Teachers — An outreach program for parents of children between birth and three years of age, including teen parents and the parents of children with disabilities. • ESL/Bilingual Education —A program for students with limited English skills. • Learn 'N Play Preschool — This program teaches Kindergarten readiness skills as well as art and music. • Kids Club After School Program is offered at all elementary schools, providing after school activities, as well as programs during spring and fall break and teacher in-service days. • Kids Club Summer Camp offers recreation and enrichment activities as well as field trips and special events for eight of the nine weeks of summer break. • The Athletic Departments offer summer ramps fro the various sports. Schools are designed to accommodate different maximum populations based on grade level. Elementary 850 Middle Schools 1,100 High School 4,200 Freshman Center 1,650 The Collin County Community College District (CCCCd) includes all of Allen. The administrative offices are located in the Spring Creek Campus, and satellite campuses are located in Plano, McKinney and Frisco. CCCCD's Allen campus at the Allen High School is home of the Center for Teaching, Learning and Professional Development (CLTPD) This 10,000 square foot facility has state-of-the-art classrooms and computer labs, and offers credit courses, concurrent classes, continuing education and workforce development training. CTLPD also houses Texas' first community college -based teacher certification program. This program is designed for degreed individuals seeking secondary -level teacher certification. Other institutions of higher education serving the Allen area include the University of Texas @ Dallas (UTD) located in Richardson, Southern Methodist University (SMU) in Dallas, and the University of North Texas (UNT) and Texas Women's University (TWU) located in Denton. Citizen Survey Over 78% of ratings for Allen schools were "good" or "excellent", as shown on Figure 9 11.1. 9.11.3 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan Figure 9.11 1. Citizen Rating of Allen Schools 2002 Citizen Survey Rating 0.5 = 0.4 0.3 c 0.2 01 8 o B&celbnt Good Average Fair Poor Source: 2002 Citizen Survey The location of Schools was identified by 68.5% of respondents as 'Important" or "Very Important" in choosing a residential neighborhood. In addition, 69.8% of respondents agreed with the concept of combining school sites with City parks, while 89.2% supported use of all community facilities for learning programs and educational purposes, and 72.1% supported collaboration with neighboring school districts to provide educational programs. Priorities and Implementation Strategies Priority: Integrate planning for school facilities with community planning to maximize community access and multiple use. Implementation Strategies: • Coordinate facility design with transportation and neighborhood design. • Coordinate the location of new schools with parks and recreational facilities. • Explore joint use facilities with schools for athletics and maintenance of facilities. • Continue to consider higher education facilities and opportunities. 9.11.4 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan 10. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Community Workshops A series of six community workshops were held on January 10, February 14, March 14, April 11, May 9, and June 13, 2002. At each meeting, various elements of the Plan were provided to serve as a basis for discussion. The workshops were held on the first Planning & Zoning Commission meeting of the month, and were aired on the public access channel. Citizen Survey A Citizen Survey was developed and administered by Leadership Allen Class XIII. It was sent to every postal patron in Allen, or 20,567 postal addresses. Of these, 2,723 responses (13.2%) were returned. The results of the survey were recorded and analyzed by the University of North Texas. The results were reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council and incorporated into the final draft of the Plan. The survey, along with a summary review by Leadership Allen Class XIII, is attached in Appendix A. Website Publication The proposed Plan was initially published on the City of Allen website on November 8, 2002, and was available throughout the period of hearings before City Council and the Planning & Zoning Commission. Stakeholder Meetings Meetings with the following community and civic groups were held during the months of December 2002: Public Hearings 1. Public hearings were held before the Planning & Zoning Commission through December 2002 and January 2003. On February 4, 2003, the Planning & Zoning Commission referred the Plan to the City Council with a recommendation for approval. The public hearing was noticed in the Allen American, the official newspaper of the city on November 16, 2002. 2. The public hearing held on January 28, 2003 before the Allen City Council was continued. The public hearing was noticed in the Allen American, the official newspaper of the city on November 16, 2002. 3. The Plan was adopted by a vote of 6 to 0 on March 11, 2003 (Ordinance No. 2145-3-03). 10.1 2002-2022 Comprehensive plan 11. IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES Responsibility for Implementation The 2002-2022 Comprehensive Plan is a policy guide and the Allen City Council is primarily responsible for its implementation, either directly through Council action or through delegation to appointed Boards and Commissions or city staff. Clearly the Council's ability to implement many strategies will be circumscribed by persons and events over which the City has little direct control. In this case, it is incumbent on community leaders to collaborate and coordinate its activities in the manner that serves the best interests of its citizens. Implementation Tools The Plan articulates policy in a general way. In many cases, additional planning will be required to fully assess the policy implications and the costs associated with implementation. Plans which require investment in infrastructure should be identified in the 5 -Year Capital Improvement Plan. The City Council also acts through its regulatory police powers such as those incorporated in its development regulations or through budgetary controls, direct or indirect. Periodic Update Process Preparation of this Plan and its implementation are but one step in the continuous planning process employed by the city. The successful activities and actions of the plan must be continually monitored. New detailed studies of areas of the plan should evaluated and designs prepared, partial updating should be done when the need arises, and the plan revisited every three years. There are four key elements of the planning process: 1. Plan Evaluation The elements of the Plan should be re-evaluated annually for relevance and should be fine-tuned. This analysis should be undertaken in conjunction with the development of the Operating Budget, the 5 -year Capital Improvement Plan and the city's strategic planning activities. The Plan should be amended or adjusted to align with any revised community objectives. 2. Partial Update A partial update should be completed every three years. This update would update pertinent statistical and demographic data and allow for reconsideration of priorities. 3. Major Update A major update should be made at least every five years. 4. Continuous Planning The Comprehensive Plan has identified areas where further study and detailed design would be beneficial: • Neighborhood Preservation studies for target residential areas • Plan for the Arts • Implementation strategies for the redevelopment of aging commercial areas • Long-term plan for financing, staffing, and operations and maintenance for city facilities and equipment. CITIZEN SURVEY (Responses in Percent) 1. How would you rate the following in the City? (Choose one for each item) Quality of new housing developments Quality of old housing developments Quality of schools Enforcement of housing maintenance codes Appearance of neighborhoods Appearance of business properties Excellent Good Avemae Fair Poor 32.6 54.7 10.8 01.5 0_5 04.3 36.7 41.7 13.5 3_7 39.6 50.1 08.0 01.9 0_3 07.9 45.7 30.7 10.1 5�C. 12.8 59.1 21.7 05.7 0_7 15.6 56.1 22.5 05.2 M 2. How would you rate the condition of the following in the City? (Choose one for each item) 7. In choosing your next home, compared to your current house, would it be (a) Smaller 13.6 (b) Same Size 333 (c) Larger 43.8 (d) Don't know 11.2 Not a Somewhat of Serious Problem Problem Problem Trash and litter 66.8 30.3 02.9 Weeds and unmowed grass 47.9 46.0 06.2 Crime 62.9 35.6 01.5 Street conditions 57.8 37.7 04.6 Traffic congestion 43.4 46.4 10.2 Congestion on streets from vehicle parking 45.9 41.0 13.1 3. In choosing your next home, would you buy in Allen? (a) Yes 61.9 (b) No 26.2 (c) No opinion 111. 4. If no, why not? (Choose all that apply) (a) Relocating 12.3 (b) Too long of a commute 7_9 (c) Expense of housing 16.6 (d) Lack of variety of housing 8_1(e) Taxes too high 61.7 (f) Safety concerns 1_9 (g) Other 17.9 5. What is important to you in choosing a neighborhood? (Choose one for each item) Very Somewhat Not Important Important Important Important Neighborhood associations 10.8 19.3 25.7 44.2 Public pools 10.8 18.7 27.2 43.3 Neighborhood amenity centers 12.7 28.5 30.4 28.4 Location of schools 36.7 30.0 12.5 20.8 Location of parks 31-6 39.9 10.2 10.2 Other 78.3 14.1 02.5 05.1 6. What criteria are important to you in choosing a home? (Choose one for each item) Very Somewhat Not Important Important Important Important Floor plan 79.1 19.5 01.1 0_3 Lot size 52.4 36.7 09.5 1_3 Energy efficiency 52.5 30.5 08.4 0_6 Alley entrance 25.1 26.3 19.9 28.7 Street entrance 18.3 24.3 21.7 35.7 Uniqueness of architecture 24.6 39.7 25.9 09.7 Diversity of housing in a neighborhood 23.1 38.5 25.2 13.3 Other 81.9 12.3 02.3 3_4 7. In choosing your next home, compared to your current house, would it be (a) Smaller 13.6 (b) Same Size 333 (c) Larger 43.8 (d) Don't know 11.2 8. Approximately how many square feet would you need in your next home? (a) Under 1400 at,. a (b)1400-2000 sf: 18.9 (c) 2001-2600 sf: 30.6 (d) 2601-3200 sf: 23.0 (e) 3201 to 4000 at,. 15.5 (f) Over 4000 sf: 3_8 (g) Don't know: §.2 9. Do you believe there is a need for the following? (Check one for each item) Strong Small No No Need Need Need Need Opinion Independent/Assisted living centers 19.9 36.8 21.2 7_5 14.6 Retirement communities 16.8 36.7 23.5 08.8 14.3 Seniors only communities 11.0 27.2 25.7 18.4 17.7 Estate Lots 10.2 22.1 27.9 19.4 20.4 Smaller lot sizes 01.5 07.4 13.4 65.8 11.8 Affordable housing 16.8 26.1 20.7 26.3 10.1 10. Would you like to see more funding given to enhancing and beautifying the thoroughfares and entryways into the City? (a) Yes 56.3 (b) No 31.3 (c) No opinion 12.3 11. Are you satisfied with the control of signs in the City? (a) Satisfied 57_7 (b) Somewhat Satisfied 33.7 (c) Not at all Satisfied 05.3 (d) No opinion 03.2 12. Are you satisfied with the control of residential development within the City? (a) Satisfied 46.6 (b) Somewhat Satisfied 40.6 (c) Not at all Satisfied 08.8 (d) No opinion 03.9 13. Are you satisfied with the control of retail development within the City? (a) Satisfied 41.5 (b) Somewhat Safisfied 43.8 (c) Not at all Satisfied 12.1 (d) No opinion 021. 14. Are you satisfied with the control of commercial development within the City? (a) Satisfied 45.6 (b) Somewhat Satisfied 41.4 (c) Not at all Satisfied 08.7 (d) No opinion 04.3 15. Are you satisfied with the control of industrial development within the City? (a) Satisfied 47.7 (b) Somewhat Satisfied 35.1 (c) Not at all Satisfied 06.9 (d) No opinion 10.3 16. How would you rate the services listed below as they are currently being provided? (Check one for each item) Very Good Good Average Not Good Poor Garbage collection 36.7 40.2 17.4 03.6 2_2 Brush and large item collection 19.3 33.7 28.3 13.0 5_6 Recycling programs 27.5 37.5 24.9 06.3 3_8 Water 31.7 46.2 18.9 U2.2 1_0 Sewer and wastewater 30.9 48.1 19.7 01.0 0_3 Animal control 220 44.6 24.3 04.3 1_8 City utility billing service 29.9 47.1 20.1 02.0 0_8 Park maintenance 30.2 48.3 17.9 03.1 9 a City facility maintenance 27.9 51.5 18.8 01.4 0_3 If asked, most people would probably agree that underground utilities (such as electrical, cable, telephone) are much more desirable than overhead lines. However, there is a cost associated with installing them underground. In Allen, that cost for new development is bome by developers. Retrofitting, upgrading, and replacing existing utility lines are not. 17. Do you believe that the City of Allen should require utility companies to place existing lines underground? (a) Yes7`7. (b) No 21.1 (c) Not sure 21.0 18. If yes, who should pay for that cost? (a) Utility company 48.3 (b) City 17.1 (c) Developers 42.8 (d) Other, be specific 9_9 19. If you selected utility company, you could probably expect a rate increase. How much would you be willing to pay for your utilities in the form of an increase in order to have the lines underground? (a) Nothing 58.8 (b)0-5%38.4 (c)6-10%2.7 (d) More than 11%.1 20. How often have you or other members of your household used each of these facilities or programs in the past year? (Check one for each facility, park, or program) Once A 2/3 Times Once A Have Not Daily Week A Month Month Used FACILITIES: Recreation Center 04.9 08.2 06.4 18.1 62.4 Swimming Pool (Indoor) 01.7 03.5 054 13.6 76.2 Swimming Pool (Outdoor) 01.7 04.6 06.3 09.5 77.9 Ball fields (Soccer, baseball, Football, softball) 03.4 14.0 06.9 09_5 66.3 Tennis Courts 0.6 02.3 02.4 08.2 86.5 Basketball Courts 0.7 02.5 03.0 07.7 86.1 PARKS: Parks 09.8 20.8 18.5 27.8 23.1 Hike 8 Bike Trails 09.8 14.6 12.5 19.5 43.6 Jogging Paths/Exercise Circuit 07.66. 11.5 09_1 11.7 60.2 Golf Course 0_5 03.0 04.2 09.7 82.6 Open Space, Natural Environment 09.0 12.3 11.6 20.5 46.6 In-line Hockey Court 0_3 01.5 0_7 01.5 96.0 PROGRAMS: Children's Recreation Programs 01.2 04.7 04.2 08.9 81.0 Teenage Recreation Programs 03.0 01_1 01.8 02.7 94.0 Adult Recreation Programs 0.5 03.2 01.9 QL5.8 88.7 Senior Citizens Recreation Programs 0.4 0.6 0.6 01_5 96.8 21. Do you think that additional parks of the following types are needed in Allen? If necessary, are you willing to pay higher taxes for these amenities? Higher Taxes? Yes No No Opinion Yes No No Opinion Greenbelt linear parks (along creeks, etc.) 52.2 30.4 17.4 36.1 55.1 08.7 Passive parks (hiking, biking, picnicking) 54.4 26.5 14.8 37.9 53.8 08.3 Active parks (ball fields) 25.3 49.5 20.2 41.2 47.8 11.1 Playgrounds 41.0 36.2 18.1 39.2 52.1 08.6 22. How would you rank the following types of parks in the City? Supported With Should be Pursued User Increased Reallocation of Better Current Taxes (a)Arboretum/Garden 39.0 34.1 26.9 68.0 07.1 29.0 Than Below No 68.3 11.7 Average Averaae Averaoe Opinion Neighborhood parks (Suncreek, Cottonwood 63.0 12.4 2�-.8 (e)Multicultural theater 19.7 45.3 35.0 65.1 10.1 Bend, Green Park, etc.) 28.4 46.2 04.2 213 Community parks (Bethany Lakes) 42.1 41.8 02.5 13.6 Citywide parks (Allen Station Park) 53.0 28.0 01.4 17.6 23. What other community facilities should be pursued and how should they be funded? (check all that apply) Supported With Should be Pursued User Increased Reallocation of Yes No No Opinion Fees Taxes Current Taxes (a)Arboretum/Garden 39.0 34.1 26.9 68.0 07.1 29.0 (b)Outdoor amphitheater (15,000+ seating for major events) 34.1 40.8 25.1 68.3 11.7 28.3 (c)Small community theater 38.0 33.5 28.6 72.9 09.4 22.8 (d)Children's community theater 34.0 34.0 ,200 63.0 12.4 2�-.8 (e)Multicultural theater 19.7 45.3 35.0 65.1 10.1 24.3 (f)Museum 24.6 49.1 26.4 60.9 Q7_3 14.6 (g)Golf course 24.6 48.9 26.6 BO.9 07.3 14.6 (h)Teen center 39.2 30.7 30.1 46.2 18.5 36.3 (i) Performing Arts Center 34.3 35.3 Q 66.3 16.7 23.7 Q)Nature Center 38.5 32.8 28.7 14.0 13.7 32.8 (k)Fann/ranch heritage center 21.3 40.1 38.6 59.8 10.0 28.3 II)Other (please explain) 05.0 00.4 00.4 00.3 00.1 24. How likely are you to visit these types of facilities in neighboring cites? Not Not Definitely Likely Sure Likely Never (a)Arboretum/Garden 27.1 33.4 14.5 19.6 05.4 (b)Outdoor amphitheater (15,000+ seating for major events) 15.6 29.5 22.5 24.9 07_5 (c)Small community theater 11.5 25.9 23.0 30.0 09.5 (d)Children's community theater 09.1 19.7 19.8 36.0 (e)Multi-cultural theater 07.0 14.2 24.2 38.3 16.4 (})Museum 18.5 32.6 1913 21.7 07.9 (g)Golf course 15.7 18.5 11.7 27.6 26.5 (h)Teen center 05.2 13.3 ir�.7 36.6 29.2 (i) Performing Arts Center 14.7 27.5 20.7 25.4 11.8 (i)Other (please explain) 60.0 08.0 10.0 11.0 11.0 25. How many times have you attended an arts function in the last year in Allen (ballet, orchestra, theater)? (a) 1 to 3 times 19.3 (b) 3 to 5 times 04.4 (c) 5 to 10 times 01.6 (d) Over 10 times 0_4 (e) Never 74.2 26. How many times have you attended a community function in the last year in Allen (summer sounds, Sunday sounds, etc.)? (a) 1 to 3 times 31.9 (b) 3 to 5 times 06.8 (c) 5 to 10 times 02.8 (d) Over 10 times 0.9 (e) Never 57.7 Founded in 1985, the Allen Community Outreach (ACO) provides a variety of services for the communities of Allen, Fairview, and Lucas. The ACO is a nonprofit organization, funded partly by Collin County United Way, an affiliate of United Way Metropolitan Dallas. However, the majority of support comes from fund-raising events and community activities. ACO also operates the Upscale Resale Shop for additional income. 27. Do you know what types of programs ACO operates? (a) Yes 46.3 (b) No 48.1 (c) No opinion 05.6 28. If yes, are you satisfied with the job ACO is doing? (a) Less than average 1_9 (b) Average 25.0 (c) Better than average 47.5 (d) Superior 12.8 (e) No opinion 12.8 29. Do you believe that the following programs are needed in the City of Allen? Alcohol and chemical abuse programs Teenage needs programs Single adult programs Family counseling services Mental Health programs (such as depression or eating disorders) Child care and latch key programs Single parent programs Senior citizen programs Abuse/assault crisis assistance Unemployment programs Affordable housing programs Literacy programs Other (Please specify) Yes No No opinion 52.9 21.6 25.5 65.1 14.2 20.7 32.1 36.7 31.3 58.7 16.2 23.2 49.1 24.3 26.6 62.5 16.5 20.9 49.6 23.6 26.8 63.1 1� 22.0 58.3 17.5 24.2 52.4 24.0 23.6 38.6 37.4 24.0 56.3 22.4 21.3 28.0 19.6 52.4 30. Do you agree with the continued use of the concept of combining school sites with city parks? (a) Yes 71.3 (b) No 12.3 (c) No opinion 16.5 31. Do you support the current concept of joint use of school/city facilities for learning programs and educational purposes? (a) Yes 90.6 (b) No 2_1 (c) No opinion 7_2 32. Should the Allen Independent School District collaborate with neighboring school districts to provide educational programs? (a) Yes 73.9 (b) No 8_5 (c) No opinion 17.6 33. In the past 2 years have you or a member of your household registered for a class/activity from the following programs? (Check all that apply) AISD Community Education programs 24.2 AISDsummercamps 15.1 City of Allen Parks and Recreation program (exercise, dance, etc.) 18.9 City of Allen Parks and Recreation athletics (softball, volleyball, etc.) 14.0 Allen Sports Association (soccer, baseball, etc.) 25.4 34. Would you like to see more of the following in Allen? (check all that apply) Fast food restaurants (Chicken, hamburger, sandwich) (a) Yes 23.2 (b) No 63.2 (c) No opinion 13.6 Family restaurants (Bennigan's, Cracker Barrel) (a) Yes 82.4 (b) No 12.9 (c) No opinion 44 Fine dining restaurants with clubs (Sullivan's, Pappas) (a) Yes 74.9 (b) No 17.3 (c) No opinion 07.8 Hotels and motels (a) Yes 37.2 (b) No 44.1 (c) No opinion 18.7 Local retail (small neighborhood shopping centers) (a) Yes 56.2 (b) No 32.3 (c) No opinion 11.6 Business support services (office supplies, computer services) (a) Yes 39.9 (b) No 40.4 (c) No opinion 19.7 Corporate Industries (a) Yes 61.8 (b) No 23.2 (c) No opinion 15.0 Business Offices/business operations (a) Yes 64.2 (b) No 19.5 (c) No opinion 16.3 Other (please specify) (a) Yes 49.2 (b) No 17.9 (c) No opinion 32.9 In January 1992 the citizens of Allen passed a citywide half -cent sales tax in support of an economic development corporation. Since its inception, the Allen Economic Development Corporation (AEDC) has been charged with facilitating expansions and relocations of new and existing businesses that in tum will bring additional tax revenue, local spending, and job opportunities to the community. A five -member board of directors, appointed by the City Council, oversees the corporation's operations. 35. Do you believe that the AEDC has contributed positively to the City? (a) Very Positive 1 .22 8.3 (b) Positive 2 (c) Somewhat positive 12.2 (d) Not Positive 3_1 (e) No Opinion 13.6 (f) Don't know what the AEDC does 24.5 36. Are you satisfied with the types of companies that the AEDC has brought to the City of Allen? (a) Very Satisfied 16.8 (b) Satisfied 31.2 (c) Somewhat satisfied 12.9 (d) Not Satisfied 2_0 (e) No Opinion 9_5 (f)(f) Don't know what types of businesses the AEDC has supported/recruited 27.6 In October 1996 the citizens of Allen passed a citywide half -cent sales tax in support of a community development corporation. The Allen Community Development Corporation (ACDC) can use the proceeds from the tax for land, buildings, equipment, and improvements that are suitable for professional and amateur athletics, entertainment and tourism, parks and public spaces, transportation and other projects that promote new or expanded business enterprises. There are seven members on the ACDC Board appointed by the City Council. To date, the ACDC has allocated $20,880,861 through sales tax revenue and bond sales. 37. Do you believe that the ACDC has contributed positively to the City? (a) Very Positive 12.3 (b) Positive 29.4 (c) Somewhat positive 15.4 (d) Not Positive 4_3 (e) No opinion 12.3 (f) Don't know what the ACDC does 26.4 38. Since its inception, a majority of the ACDC budget has gone towards parks and park -related expenditures. Would you like to see more ACDC funding for other activities such as: (a) Central Business District redevelopment activities (landscaping, sidewalks, public art, etc) (b) Entryway Improvements (landscaping, monument signage, etc.) (c) Facilities for the arts (d) Public Library development (a) Other (f) No changes necessary (g) Don't know enough about what the ACDC does (a) Yes 48.3 (b) No 28.7 (c) No opinion 23.0 (a) Yes 44.2 (b) No 33.0 (c) No opinion 22.7 (a) Yes 38.7 (b) No 35.3 (c) No opinion 26.0 (a) Yes 67.0 (b) No 161 (c) No opinion 11� (a) Yes 11.¢ (b) No L (c) No opinion7�.5 (a) Yes 15.9 (b) No 22.0 (c) No opinion 62.2 (a) Yes 36.6 (b) No 13.0 (c) No opinion 50.3 39. How likely would you be to utilize the following types of mass transit if available? (Choose one for each item) Very Somewhat Not Not Likely Likely Sure Likely Never Bus 09.9 14.3 16.1 35.0 24.8 Rail �4.6 27.5 12.5 12.6 11.7 Park and ride facilities 19.3 24.0 18.3 22.6 15.8 40. How likely would you be to utilize mass transit service for the following? (Choose one for each item) 41. If you work outside of Allen, how long is your commute to work? (a) 15 minutes or less 8_6 (b) 15-30 minutes 32.3 (c) 30-45 minutes 22.6 (d) 45-60 minutes 11.4 (e) Over 60 minutes 3_5 (f) Don't commute 21.6 Very Somewhat Not Not Likely Likely Sure Likely Never Commute to work 22.0 15.1 11.2 23.9 27.8 Daily activities other than work (shopping, area attractions) 13.2 24.8 15.8 26.3 20.0 Special events (festivals, sporting events, concerts, cultural events) 36.3 36.2 10.2 07.8 09.6 41. If you work outside of Allen, how long is your commute to work? (a) 15 minutes or less 8_6 (b) 15-30 minutes 32.3 (c) 30-45 minutes 22.6 (d) 45-60 minutes 11.4 (e) Over 60 minutes 3_5 (f) Don't commute 21.6 The Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) currently provides buses and rail transit for a large portion of the Dallas area. It is funded by one cent of the sales tax that is collected by its member cities. If the City of Allen were to join DART, it would necessitate the City allocating an amount equal to one cent of its sales tax for membership (currently about $6,000,000 annually). All of the City's sales tax dollars are currently allocated (one cent to the City, one half cent to the Allen Economic Development Corporation and one half cent to the Allen Community Development Corporation). 42. Should the City join DART? (a) Yes 51.2 (b) No 34.5 (c) No opinion 14.2 43. Although it would require an election, would you like to see a portion of the funding for the AEDC, ACDC, and city sales taxes used for transportation funding? (a) Yes 46.5 (b) No 33.1 (c) No opinion 20.4 44. Do you support? (Check one for each item) Beer and wine retail sales in grocery/convenience stores (a) Yes 64.6 (b) No 31.8 (c) No Opinion 3_6 Beer, wine, liquor retail sales in liquor stores (a) Yes 53.7 (b) No 42.7 (c) No Opinion 3_7 Beer and wine sold in restaurants/clubs without the need for a private club status (Unicard, etc) (a) Yes 75.5 (b) No 21.6 (c) No Opinion 2_9 Beer, wine, and liquor sold in restaumnts/clubs without the need for a private club status (Unicard, etc.) (a) Yes 71.1 (b) No 25.7 (c) No Opinion 3_1 45. Did you vole in the May 2001, City Council election? (a) Yes 39.4 (b) No 60.6 46. If no, why not? (a) Did not live in Allen 18.4 (b) Not registered to vole 7_5 (c) No interest 7_2 (d) Not enough knowledge about candidates running for office 42.0 (e) Unable to vote due to personal obligations 13.9 (f) Did not know there was an election 7_1 (g) Did not know where or when to vote 8_7 (h) Inconvenient voting locations 1_3 (1) Inconvenient voting times 1_6 0) Satisfied with the way the city is being run 5_7 (k) Not a US citizen 4_5 47. What is the total number of people living in your household? (a)19_1 (b)233.0 (c)319.4 (d)426.1 (a)59_6 (f)62.1 (g)70_3 (h)80_1 (i) More than 8001 48. Of these household members, how many are 18 or younger? (a)02_9 (b)140.1 (c)217.9 (d)327.7 (a)48_7 (1)52_3 (g)60_3 (h)7 01 (i)80_1 0)More than 80_0 49. What is the age of the male head of household or husband, whichever applies? (a) 17-24 0_6 (b) 25-29 6_5 (c) 30-34 14.5 (d) 35-3916.6 (e) 40-44 17.4 (f) 45-49 11.3 (g) 50-54 9_2 (h) 55-59 6_2 (i) 60-64 4_3 0) 65 or over 5_8 (k)n/a 7_4 50. What is the age of the female head of household or wife, whichever applies? (a)17 -24_L4 (b)25-299.0 (c)30-3415.6 (d)35-3917.6 (e)40-4416.6 (f)454911.8 (g)50Z4§&. (h)55-596.7 (i)60-641.§ 0) 65 or over 5 1 (k) n/a 51. What is the highest level of education completed by the male head of household/husband? (a) High school graduate or less Z.Q (b) Some college 22.5 (c) College graduate 42.0 (d) Post graduate work 7_1(e) Post graduate degree 21.4 52. What is the highest level of education completed by the female head of household/wife? (a) High school graduate or less 10.6 (b) Some college 30.5 (c) College graduate 37.7 (d) Post graduate work 7_5(e) Post graduate degree 13.7 53. In what city is the male head of householdthusband employed? (a) Allen 11.2 (b) Dallas 25.7 (c) Frisco .7 (d) McKinney 2_9 (e) Plano 17.8 (f) Richardson 13.3 (g) Other 14.1 (h) n/a 1,F3- 54. In what city is the female head of household/wife employed? (a) Allen 18.1 (b) Dallas its (c) Frisco .8 (d) McKinney 2_2 (e) Plano 15.6 (f) Richardson (g) Other 7_3 (h) n/a 37.1 55. Check whichever applies regarding employment outside the home. (a) only female head of household/wife working 10.6 (b) only male head of household/husband working 33.7 (c) both working 33.7 (d) neither working 7_3 56. How long have you lived in the city of Allen? (a) Less than 1 year 13.4 (b) 1-3 years 23.3 (c) 3-5 years 14.8 (d) 5-10 years 21.7 (e) 10 years 8 Over 26.8 57. In which area of Allen do you live? (a) North of FM 2170 (Main/McDermott) and west of US 75 (Central Expressway) 17.4 (b) South of FM 2170 (Main/McDermott) and west of US 75 (Central Expressway) 11.6 (c) North of FM 2170 (Main/McDermott) and east of US 75 (Central Expressway)30.5 (d) South of FM 2170 (Main McDermott) and east of US 75 (Central Expressway) 40.5 58. Are you aware that opportunities exist to serve as a volunteer on various Boards and Commissions within the City of Allen (Planning & Zoning Commission, Parks Board, AEDC, ACDC, etc.)? (a) Yes 49.3 (b) No 39.1 (c) Not sure 10.6 59. Would you be interested in serving on a Board or Commission? (a) Yes 21.2 (b) No 41.5 (c) Not sure 37.3 60. If yes, please contact the City Secretary's Once at 972-727-0106 for information. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council The City of Allen has served as a model for expansion and development. Despite rapid growth over the past decade, the City has successfully controlled expansion and ensured that the infrastructure has maintained pace with the population growth. This success is not by accident, but has been achieved as a result of an extensive process of planning. One of the key components of this planning process is the development of a "Comprehensive Plan." The Comprehensive Plan is a document which clearly lays out the goals, policies and needs, both immediate and anticipated, of the City. The last Comprehensive Plan was developed in 1998 and it was determined that a new Plan would be developed in 2002. One of the key components of the Comprehensive Plan is input from the citizens of Allen. In order to obtain this input, a survey was needed. The members of Leadership Allen Class XIII assumed responsibility for developing and administering this survey as their class project. The project involved developing the survey questions, determining how the survey would be conducted (i.e., phone survey vs. written), distributing the survey, publicizing the project, compiling the results, and summarizing the results. Early in the process the class determined that the survey should be distributed to all citizens of Allen as opposed to just a sample as had been done in the past. Accordingly, surveys were distributed to every postal address in the city. A total of 20,567 copies were distributed of which, 2,723 responses (13.2%) were returned. The survey was submitted to the City Planning Department for use in developing the Comprehensive Plan. The survey, as well as our summary of the results, are included on the following pages. It should be pointed out that the summary discussion does not address all questions in the survey, but rather those items which we consider significant. Additionally, responses to the questions asked are subject to interpretation and the summary represents the opinion of the Class only. Leadership Allen is a program sponsored by the Allen Chamber of Commerce to promote community involvement and to educate program participants on various topics including City Government, Economic Development, Justice and Law Enforcement, Education and Health and Human Services. We respectfully submit the following summary and survey results for use in developing the Comprehensive Plan. We believe and hope that this information will be of significant value in the continued development of this great city. Leadership Allen, Class XIII Robert Boone Jennifer Grimm Kurt Kizer Richie Dodgen Cheryl Hand Jeannie Sargent Andre' DUBos Dave Hamden JoAnn Schleeter Neal Friedman Melody Herring Judy Webster Shelley George David Hoover EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/GENERAL OBSERVATIONS The following items were identified as significant conclusions from the survey. More detailed discussion of these items can be found in the Results section which follows: • Schools continue to rank high, both in quality and the importance of schools in choosing a home. • Crime remains under control. Safety concerns continue to remain relatively low when compared to previous surveys, in spite of the significant growth experienced by the City. • Citizens indicated that taxes are too high. Questions throughout the survey addressing program funding issues consistently indicated a low tolerance for tax increases. The biggest reason why existing residents would not choose their next home in Allen was due to the high tax rate. • Although residents would like to see more "Family" and "Fine Dining" restaurants in Allen, they clearly indicated that there was not a need for any additional "Fast Food" restaurants. • Support for an Arts Facility was split with a number of respondents expressing no opinion. This would suggest that support could be garnered for such a facility, but would probably need to clearly address funding and tax issues as stated above. • A majority of residents support membership in DART and are open to redistribution of existing sales and city tax revenues to pay for that membership. • There is clear support for changes in alcohol sales. Respondents expressed support for changes in alcohol sales in both retail establishments and restaurants. RESULTS Neighborhoods and Housing With respect to neighborhoods and housing in the City of Allen, the majority of the respondents rated the quality of new housing developments and the quality of schools very high. In particular, the quality of schools was rated as good or excellent by nearly 90% of the respondents. Also rated highly was the lack of trash and litter (only 3% of the respondents consider this a sedous problem) and the level of crime (only 1.5% mid crime was a serious problem. The 1997 survey indicated that about 3% felt either somewhat or very unsafe. This is significant because high growth is often accompanied by an increase in crime. Allen seems to have maintained a handle on crime despite its growth. Areas for improvement included the need for better enforcement of housing maintenance codes of which 16% of the respondents rated a s fair or poor. Traffic congestion in general and congestion on streets from vehicle parking in particular were also rated relatively poorly. In both cases, more than half of the respondents felt that congestion was at least somewhat of a problem with 10% and 13%, respectively, indicating that these were serious problems. When asked in choosing your next home, would you buy in Allen, 26% said no. Of those who said no, 62% mid they would not because taxes were too high. The second highest response was expense of housing with 17%. Generally speaking, city services (garbage collection, recycling programs, etc.) were rated highly. In most cases each of the city services listed were ranked average or better by over 90% of the respondents. The two exceptions included "Brush and large item collection" and "Recycling programs" which were rated not good or poor by 19% and 10% of the respondents, respectively. Again, it should be pointed out that these ratings are low relative to the other services identified, but still rank fairly high on an absolute basis (for instance, 65% said that recycling programs were good or very good). Additionally, the rating for "Brush and large item collection" improved significantly as compared to the 1997 survey in which 27% of the respondents rated this service as poor. Recycling programs were not included in the 1997 survey. Parks and Recreation The survey asked whether additional parks were needed in Allen and if citizens were willing to pay higher taxes for additional parks. A majority of respondents indicated that more greenbelt linear parks and passive parks were needed, while most thought additional active parks were not needed. The need for additional playgrounds was close with just slightly more respondents indicating that more were needed (41% yes, 36% no, and 18% had no opinion). In all cases, respondents indicated they were not willing to pay higher taxes. The quality of the existing parks was rated highly with less than 5% of the respondents rating any of the parks below average. Citywide parks (such as Allen Station Park) rated highest in quality with community parks such as Bethany Lakes close behind. With respect to the use of city facilities or programs, the most used facilibes/programs included parks (77%), hike and bike trails (56%), open space/natural environment (53%), and jogging path/exercise circuits (40%). The least used facilities/programs included senior citizens recreation programs (3%), in-line hockey court (4%), teenage recreation programs (6%), and adult recreation programs (11%). Arts When asked how many times have you attended an arts function in Allen, 74% said never, while 58% said they have never attended a community function. With regard to community facilities, support was indicated for pursuing an Aboretum/Garden (39% "yes" responses), small community theater (38%), Teen Center (39%) and a nature center (39%). It should be noted in all cases, support was slight with over 25% of the respondents having no opinion on any of those facilities. Respondents indicated by a significant margin that they did not support pursuing facilities for a museum (49% "no" responses), golf course (49%, or a multi -cultural center (45%). Again, in each case more than 25% indicated no opinion. With respect to funding any facilities, respondents clearly indicated that there was little support for any type of tax increase. The clear majority of respondents indicated that community facilities should be funded with user fees, essentially being self-supporting. As there is currently an effort to build a performing arts center in conjunction with surrounding communities, it's interesting to note that support for such a center is a virtual dead heat. To the question of whether a performing arts center should be pursued, 34% said yes, 35% said no, and 30% had no opinion. With respect to funding, 66% indicated such a facility should be supported by user fees. Again, it seems that support for such a facility could be obtained, but that there is little support for using tax dollars to fund such an endeavor. Social Services Social Services were not addressed in the last survey. The class felt it pertinent to address issues regarding social services. The Allen Community Outreach (ACO) is the only local human services agency in Allen. Due to "downsizing" in the workplace or a medical emergency within their family, ACO is seeing many new clients - not only the continual low-income, generational poor, but also the newly situational poor and the ever-growing population of senior citizens and their changing needs. These are times in which ACO's role is critical. The mission of ACO is to improve the quality of life through the provision of basic necessities, specialized programs, and independent living skills for families in need. When asked do you know what types of programs ACO operates, 46% of the respondents indicated "yes." For those who responded "yes; over 60% felt that ACO was performing better than average or superior. Fewer than 2% thought the ACO was below average. When asked what programs were needed, most programs listed received a majority of "yes" responses. The three exceptions included Single Adult Programs (32% "yes" responses), Affordable Housing Programs (38%) and Mental Health Programs (49%). The highest rated programs included Teenage Needs Programs (65%). Senior Citizen Programs (63%), Child Care and Latch Key Programs (63%) and Family Counseling Services (59%). It should be noted that a significant number of respondents, at Least 20% in all cases, had no opinion. Economic Development Regarding economic development, respondents were asked what types of business establishments they would like to see more of in Allen. The strongest positive responses were for family restaurants and fine dining restaurants to which 82% and 75%, respectively, indicated they would like to see more of these types of establishments. Business Offices, Corporate Industries and local retail establishments also received generally positive responses. There was a clear indication that residents were not interested in additional fast food restaurants and a slightly negative attitude towards more hotels and motels. Both of these categories were supported in the 1997 survey. The Allen Economic Development Corporation (AEDC) was created in 1992 and charged with facilitating expansions and relocations of new and existing businesses that in turn will bring additional tax revenue, local spending, and job opportunities to the community. When asked whether they believed that the AEDC has contributed positively to the City, of those who had an opinion and knew what the AEDC did, 95% indicated that the AEDC contributed positively to the City. Likewise, nearly 97% of the respondents who had an opinion were satisfied with the types of companies the AEDC has attracted. In 1996 the Allen Community Development Corporation (ACDC) was created and given responsibility to use a half -cent sales tax for land, buildings, equipment, and improvements that are suitable for professional and amateur athletics, entertainment and enterprises. When asked whether the ACDC has contributed positively to the city, of those who had an opinion, 93% felt that it has contributed positively to the City. When asked whether they would like to see more of this revenue directed towards other activities, a significant number of respondents (67%) indicated support for using these funds for the development of a public library. Addifionally there was some support for redevelopment of the Central Business District (48%) and entryway improvements (44%), although a significant number of people (23% to each question) expressed no opinion. Again, when asked about funding an Arts facility, there was not a strong opinion, with 39% positive responses, 35% negative and 26% with no opinion. Transportation When asked how likely respondents would be to utilize mass transit facilities if available, nearly 60% said they would not likely or never ride a bus. By contrast, over 62% of respondents indicated that they would be likely to utilize rail service. Responses to Park and Ride services were indifferent. Slightly over 37% of the respondents indicated that they would utilize mass transit for commuting purposes while 52% would not. When asked whether you would use mass transit for special events, including sporting events and concerts, nearly 73% indicated a likelihood to utilize mass transit. Of those responding, 51 % indicated the City should join DART, with 35% indicating we should not join. Respondents were also generally positive to redirecting funds from AEDC, ACDC and the city sales tax to fund such membership. The survey asked how long individuals commuted, just under 15% of the respondent indicated they commuted 45 minutes or longer. Alcohol Sales With regard to alcohol sales in Allen, there were relatively few people who did not have an opinion about this issue. When asked whether they supported beer and wine retail sales in grocery/convenience stores, 65% said "yes" as compared to 53% in the 1997 survey. Additionally, 54% supported beer, wine and liquor retail sales in liquor stores as compared to 30% in 1997. Support for beer and wine sales in restaurants without the need for a "club status" was 76%. When liquor was included in the same question, the support rate dropped to 71 %. This question was not asked in 1997. Clearly, support for alcohol sales has increased over the past five years.