Loading...
O-698-5-86ORDINANCE NO. 6 9 8- 5- 8 6 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ALLEN, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ALLEN, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, SO AS TO ESTABLISH PERMANENT ZONING, TO -WIT: "PD" PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 369 ON THE FOLLOWING -DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND: APPROXIMATELY 100.2 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF THE FRANCES DOSSER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 280, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS, LOCATED NORTH OF STACY ROAD AND WEST OF U.S. 75; PROVIDING FOR A LAND USE MAP AND AREA AND USE REGULATIONS: PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($19000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Allen, and the governing body of the City of Allen, in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas and the ordinances of the City of Allen, have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all the property owners generally and to all persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, and in the exercise of its legislative discretion, have concluded that the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance should be amended: NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE THE CITY OF ALLEN, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Allen, Texas, as heretofore amended, be and the same is hereby amended by amending the Zoning Map of the City of Allen on a 100.2 acre tract of land described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes to give the following described tract of land the following zoning classification, to -wit: That the area be and the same is hereby zoned as "PD" Planned Development No. 36. Ordinance No. 698-5-86 - Page 1 SECTION 2. That the Land Use Map and Area and Use Regulations approved as described as Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes shall be adhered to in its entirety for the purposes of development of "PD" Planned Development No. 36. SECTION 3. That all ordinances of the City of Allen in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall be, and the same are hereby, repealed; provided, however, all other provisions of said ordinances not in conflict herewith shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. That the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto shall be used in the manner and for the purposes provided for as approved by the attachment of Exhibit "B". SECTION 5. That any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Allen, as previously amended, and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine not to exceed the sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) for each offense. SECTION 6. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional or invalid by any judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality or invalidity shall not affect any other remaining phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance; and the City Council hereby declares it would have passed the remaining portions even though it had known the affected parts would be held unconstitutional. SECTION 7. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage and publication in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the City of Allen, and it is accordingly so ordained. Ordinance No. 698-5-86 page 2 DULY PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALLEN, TEXAS, ON THE 1 s DAY OF May 1986. APPROVED: Donald P. Rodenbaugh, Mayor ATTEST: Marty Hendrix, Ci Secretary A ROVED AST FORM: A. Don Crowder, City Attorney Ordinance No. 698-5-86 _ Page 3 Attachment to: Ordinance 698-5-86 Adopted May 1, 1986 "Exhibit B" PLANNED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SANDISON TRACT TRACT 1 "GO" GARDEN OFFICE DISTRICT REGULATIONS 1. Purpose: This district is intended for low rise office uses not dependent upon retail trade or retail traffic for their operation. This district is designed to permit the location of offices of any profession, trade, or service near their clients and minimize the effect upon residential and commercial areas. The heights set- back, sign controls, and parking regulations are intended to allow flexibility in design and maintain aesthetics and neighborhood qual- ity. 2. Use Regulations: a. Professional Administrative Offices where services are provid- ed only and no chattels or goods are offered for sale on the premises, including but not limited to doctors, dentists, at- torneys, architects, engineers, insurance, real estate, and similar offices. b. Clinics. C. Office Buildings. d. The incidental retail sale of food, beverages, and other con- venience items or services is permitted to the occupants of offices, as long as these items are not advertised and offered for sale to the general public. e. Accessory buildings and uses customarily incidental to any of the above uses. f. Such uses may be permitted under provisions of Section 2.06, Specific Use Permits. 3. Height Regulations: The maximum height for the main building shall be two (2) standard stories, but shall not exceed thirty (30) Attachment to: Ordinance 698-5-86 Adopted May 1, 1986 "Exhibit B" feet in height. In no event, however, shall any building exceed one (1) standard story when located within one hundred, fifty (150) feet of any property zoned for residential purposes. 4. Area Regulations: a. Size of Yards: (1) Front Yards: (a) There shall be a minimum front yard having a depth of not less than one hundred (100) feet adjacent to any street with a right-of-way of one hundred (100) feet or more. (b) There shall be a minimum front yard having a depth of not less than twenty-five (25) feet adjacent to any street with a right-of-way less than one hun- dred (100) feet. (c) Lots having double frontage shall provide the required setback from both streets. (2) Side Yards: (a) There shall be a minimum side yard for each side of the lot or tract on which any single building or building complex is constructed of fifty (50) feet. (b) On corner lots the required front yard setback shall be provided on both streets and such required yard may not be used for parking purposes. (3) Rear Yards: No rear yard is required, except that a rear yard of not less than fifty (50) feet in depth shall be provided upon that portion of a lot abutting or across a rear street form an "R" District. 2 Attachment to: Adopted May 1, "Exhibit B" (a) Ordinance 698-5-86 1986 (b) Lot Coverage: In no case shall more than fifty (50) percent of the total lot area be covered by the combined area of the main buildings and accessory buildings. Floor Area Ratio: The ratio of total floor area of all buildings to total land area shall be a maximum of .5:1. TRACT 2 "IT" INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY DISTRICT REGULATIONS 1. Purpose: This district is characterized by development of indus- trial parks for the purpose of light distribution, processing, and manufacturing. The regulations in this district are intended to provide for a campus type of development for building sites to accommodate land uses on tracts of four acres or more. 2. Use Regulations: a. Office buildings. b. Electronics products manufacturer. C. Apparel or related manufacturer. d. Light fabrication and assembly. e. Printing establishments. f. Distribution center (no outside storage). g. Uses similar to the above listed uses provided activities con- ducted observe the requirements of all City Ordinances. h. Such uses as may be permitted under the provisions of Sec- tion 2.06, Specific Use Permit. 3. Height Regulations: The maximum height for i the main building) shall be three (3) standard stories but shall not exceed forty-five (45) feet in height provided that any building or portion thereof' may be erected above said limit if set back from all street lines and required yard lines is one (1) foot for each one (1) foot of its 3 Attachment to: Ordinance No. 698-5-86 Adopted May 1, 1986 "Exhibit B" f. Distribution center (no outside storage). g. Uses similar to the above listed uses provided activities con- ducted observe the requirements of all City Ordinances. h. Such uses as may be permitted under the provisions of Sec- tion 2.06, Specific Use Permit. 3. Height Regulations: The maximum height for the main building shall be three (3) standard stories but shall not exceed forty-five (45) feet in height provided that any building or portion thereof may be erected above said limit if set back from all street lines and required yard lines is one (1) foot for each one (1) foot of its height above said limit. In no event, however, shall any building exceed thirty (30) feet in height when located within two hundred (200) feet of any property zoned for residential purposes. 4. Area Regulations: a. Size of Yards: (1) Front Yard: (a) There shall be a minimum front yard having a depth of not less than one hundred (100) feet adjacent to any street with a right-of-way of one hundred (100) feet or more. (b) There shall be a minimum front yard having a depth of not less than fifty (50) feet adjacent to any street with a right-of-way less than one hundred' (100) feet provided that any building or portion of a building greater than forty-five (45) feet in height must be set back from the property line one (1) foot for each one (1) foot above such limit with a maximum setback of two hundred (200) feet re- gardless of the height of the building. (c) Lots having double frontage shall provide the required setback from both streets. 4 Attachment to: Ordinance 698-5-86 Adopted May 1, 1986 "Exhibit B" (d) No parking storage or similar uses shall be allowed in required front yards in District "IT". (2) Side Yards: (a) There shall be a minimum side yard for each side of the lot or tract on which any single building or building complex is constructed of twenty-five (25) feet provided that any building or portion of a building greater than forty-five (45) feet in height must be set back from any side street, alley, or "R" District, one (1) foot for each one (1) foot above such limit with a maximum setback of one hundred (100) feet regardless of the height of the building. (3) Rear Yards: There shall be a minimum rear yard of twenty-five (25) feet except that a rear yard of not less than fifty (50) feet in depth shall be provided upon that portion of a lot abutting or across a rear street or alley from an "R" District, however, any building exceeding forty-five (45) feet in height must be set back one (1 ) foot for each one (1) foot above such limit, with a maxi- mum setback of one hundred (100) feet regardless of the' height of the building. I (a) Lot Coverage: No requirement except that required by establishment of yards or landscaping require- ments. (b) Floor Area Ratio: The ratio of total floor area of all buildings to total land area shall be a maximum i of 1.2. (4) Lot Area: Minimum four (4) acres. 5 Attachment to: Ordinance No. 698-5-86 Adopted May 1, 1986 "Exhibit B" 5. Building Regulations: a. Type of Materials: All main building exteriors shall be con- structed of stone, brick, tiles, cement, concrete, or similar materials. TRACTS 3 i "LI" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT REGULATIONS 1. Purpose: This district is characterized by development of indus- trial parks for the purpose of light distribution, processing, and manufacturing. The regulations in this district are intended to preserve a light industrial nature particularly with regard to ar- chitecture, aesthetics, noise, odor, dust, and other noxious con- ditions. 2. Use Regulations: a. Office buildings. b. Electronics products manufacturer. C. Apparel or related manufacturer. d. Light fabrication and assembly. e. Printing establishments. f. Distribution center (no outside storage). g. Uses similar to the above listed uses provided activities con- ducted observe the requirements of all City Ordinances. h. Such uses as may be permitted under the provisions of Sec- tion 2.06, Specific Use Permit. 3. Height Regulations: The maximum height for the main building shall be three (3) standard stories but shall not exceed forty-five (45) feet in height provided that any building or portion thereof may be erected above said limit if set back from all street lines 6 Attachment to: Ordinance No. 698-5-86 Adopted May 1, 1986 "Exhibit B" and required yard lines is one (1) foot for each one (1) foot of its height above said limit. In no event shall any building exceed thirty (30) feet in height when located within two hundred (200) feet of any property zoned for residential purposes. 4. Area Regulations: a. Size of Yards: Yards: There shall (1) Front Yard: side yard for (a) There shall be a minimum front yard having a depth ing of not less than one hundred (100) feet adjacent to of twenty-five) any street with a right-of-way of one hundred any building or (100) feet or more. (b) There shall be a minimum front yard having a depth street, alley of not less than fifty (50) feet adjacent to any' (1) foot for each one street with a right-of-way less than one hundred (100) feet provided that any building or portion of a building greater than forty-five (45) feet in height must be set back from the property line one (1) foot for each one (1) foot above such limit with a maximum setback of two hundred (200) feet re- gardless of the height of the building. (c) Lots having double frontage shall provide the required setback from both streets. i (d) No parking storage or similar uses shall be allowed, in required front yards in District "LI". (2) Side Yards: There shall be a minimum side yard for each side of the tract or lot on which any single build- ing or building complex is constructed of twenty-five) (25) feet provided that any building or portion of a building greater than forty-five (45) feet in height must be set back from any side street, alley or "R" District one (1) foot for each one (1) foot above such limit with 7 Attachment to: Ordinance No. 698-5-86 Adopted May 1, 1986 "Exhibit B" 5. a maximum setback of one hundred (100) feet regardless of the height of the building. (3) Rear Yard: There shall be a minimum rear yard of twenty-five (25) feet except that a rear yard of not less than fifty (50) feet in depth shall be provided upon that portion of a lot abutting or across a rear street or alley from an "R" District, however, any building exceeding forty-five (45) feet in height must be set back one (1 ) foot for each one (1 ) foot above such limit, with a maxi- mum setback of one hundred (100) feet regardless of the height of the building. (a) Lot Coverage: No requirement except that required by establishment of yards or landscaping require- ments. (b) Floor Area Ratio: The ratio of total floor area of all buildings to total land area shall be a maximum of 1:1. Building Regulations: a. Type of Materials: All main building exteriors shall be con- structed of stone, brick, tiles, cement, concrete, or similar materials. 8 Attachment Adopted May "Exhibit B" to: Ordinance No. 698-5-86 1, 1986 L.A. SEARS TRACT 1 TRACT 2 GO "" IT GARDEN OFFICE INDUSTRIAL TECHNOL60Y- s 9.7 AC. - 18.2 AC. OAROARADD , J — J W ATT FRS yjy ` < TRACT 3 v LI Uj LIGHT INDUSTRIAL - r 72.3 AC. LAND USE SUMMARY ` TRACT USE • ACRES 1 Carden Office 9.7 Ac. 2 Industrial Technology 18.2 Ac. 3 Light Industrial 72.3 Ac. N co 7 / m 2 Y K .r STACY ROAD ... DOYLE a. STACY CITY OF ALLEN, TEXAS OWNER: ZONING REQUEST BETSY J.T. DUNKIN l ASSOCIATES, INC. BUSH SANDISON X�. Attachment to: Ordinance No. 698-5-86 Adopted May 1, 1986 "Exhibit B" CURRENT LAND USE AND I THOROUGHFARE PLAN CITY OF ALLEN, TEXAS /��,s0-z I RIDCx�vr�w DR. r.P r.......... I �l Q / HP) ,5'ACY F KRji� R�lGC.\, FP GG -J-T- DUNKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC Urban Planning Landscape Architecture Attachment to: Ordinance No. 698-5-85 Adopted May 1, 1986 "Exhibit B" TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS BETSY BUSH TRACT -- ALLEN, TEXAS MARCH 1986 INTRODUCTION This study involves the traffic impact analysis of a 100.2 acre tract of land located in Allen, Texas, described as the Betsy Bush Tract. • This analysis estimates the relative level of daily traffic generated by the proposed uses of the site and the resulting impact on the existing or proposed street system in the immediate vicinity of the site. In late 1985, Jones-Friebele Consulting Engineers, Inc. performed a similar traffic impact analysis on a 180 acre site adjacent to the tract currently under study. The analyses performed for both tracts are identical in methodology and assumptions. This report also presents results aggregated for the two tracts. DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA The proposed development is located in the northern portion of the City of Allen, Texas, south of SH 121 and west of US 75. Besides these two principle facilities, streets planned to serve the immediate area include: * Stacy Rd. -- Six/Eight-lane divided (future) * Ridgeview Dr. -- Six -lane divided (future) +� Watters Rd. -- Six -lane divided (future) These facilities are depicted relative to each other in the attached Figure 1. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The 100.2 acre tract is proposed for the following development types, land areas and coverages: Garden Offices Industrial Tech. Lignt Industrial JONES-FRIEBELE Consulting Engineers Inc. 9.7 acres 1:1 FAR 18.2 acres 1:2 FAR 72.3 acres 1:1 FAR 1 Attachment to: Ordinance No. 698--5-86 Adopted May 1, 1986 "Exhibit B" TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Analysis of traffic impacts resulting from the development of the site involves the specific steps of Trip Generation, Trip Distribution and Trip Assignment. Trip Generation involves estimates of the numbers of vehicle trips, on a daily basis, that could be expected to occur as a result of the type of land uses proposed. Characteristics of various land uses throughout the country have been studied and reported in the Informational Report of the Institute of Transportation Engineers titled Trip Generation (Third Edition). These information have been used in this study. Trip Generation The proposed development, as submitted for the City of Allen's consideration, is estimated to generated a total of 25,402 vehicle trip -ends, daily. The trip generation results for each proposed land use is shown in the attached Table 1. Three other scenarios of trip generation have been developed for comparative purposes. The first of these comparisons involves the trip generation characteristics of the site if the proposed land uses were developed at the maximum intensity (FAR) currently allowed in the City's Ordinances. Table 2 shows that such a scenario would result in approximately 27,567 daily trip -ends or 8.5 percent greater than the development intensities requested. Table 3 presents the scenario of resulting trip generation based on, the minimum amount of surface parking required for the requested developments. This scenario represents a practical limit on the trips generated by the proposed development unless multi-level parking structures were constructed. Tables 4-A and 4-B presents a rather complicated scenario whereby the 100.2 acre tract has been assumed to be developed exactly to the levels described in the most recent Comprehensive Plan. The City's land use plan has envisioned various relative amounts of commercial, office and industrial development in Neighborhood Unit #11, which this tract is within. Proportioning the 100.2 acre tract by the amounts of the stated land uses in the 378 acre Neighborhood Unit 411 results in the acreage of uses shown in Table 4-B. These land uses were then assigned the trip generation characteristics in the standard manner. Total resulting trips generated by the land uses proposed in the City's comprehensive Plan would be 36,764 per day, or 44.7 percent greater than the levels generated by the requested development. It should be noted that the trips generated for the proposed development and the resulting assignment have not been reduced for "internally satisfied" trip purposes although some amount of internal satisfaction could be expected. JONES - FRIEBELE Consulting Engineers Inc. Attachment to: Ordinance•No. 698-5-,86 Adopted May 1,.1986 "Exhibit B" Trip Distribution and Assignment Distribution of the traffic levels forecast for the requested 100.2 acre Betsy Bush development (as presented in Table 1) has been accomplished in the same manner as the earlier analysis involving the 180 acre Bryan Bush Tract. The resulting traffic distributions were then assigned to the surrounding street network and compared to the plannned characteristics of the roadway network to support the estimated traffic levels. Figure 1 depicts the traffic assigned to the various roadway segments for the 25,402 daily trips from the Betsy Bush Tract. Table 5 presents the roadway segment projected volumes for the Betsy Bush Tract compared to the planned capacity of the roadways. This Table shows that the Betsy Bush Tract would utilize between 3.3 and 32.8 percent of the various roadway segment's capacity Cat Level of Service 'C'). The capacity figures are based on the NCTCOG figures published in April, 1984 with Level 'C' volumes being 80 percent of the published Level 'E' daily service volumes. The aggregate impacts of both the 100 acre Betsy Bush Tract and the 180 acre Bryan Bush Tract are shown schematicaly in Figure 2 and tabulated in Table 5 which also compares the aggregate estimated roadway traffic volumes to the projected roadway capacities. In all cases, the impact of the total development traffic generation characteristics is well below the Level 'C' capacity. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The proposed 100 acre development was found to produce approximately 25,400 vehicle trip -ends daily. The resulting distribution and assignment of these vehicle trips to the surrounding roadway system were found to produce relatively minimal impact with expected daily traffic volumes for this development and those developments in the immediate area which are known to be within a design level of service. JONES - FRIEBELE Consulting Engineers Inc. Attachment to: Ordinance No. 698-5-86 Adopted May 1,.1986 "Exhibit B" Gross Tract Proposed Use Acres I Garden Office 9.7 2 Industrial Tech 18.2 3 Light Indust. 72.3 TOTAL 100.2 JONES-FRIEBELE Consulting Engineers Inc. TABLE 2 MAXIMUM ALLOWED FAR Trip Generation BETSY BUSH TRACT -- ALLEN, TEXAS FAR Coverage 1 11 422,532 SF 1 s1 792,792 SF 1 tl 31149,388 SF ITE Land Pct. Use Daily Daily AM PM Code Trips Total Trips . Trips 713 61042 21.9% 845 858 110 41329 15.7% 680 935 110 17,196 62.4% 31496 3,716 27,567 100.0% 51221 5,510 Attachment to: Ordinance No. 698-5-8 Adopted May 1, 1986 "Exhibit B" TABLE 1 PROPOSED Development Plan Trip Generation BETSY BUSH TRACT -- ALLEN, TEXAS ITE Land TOTAL 100.2 JONES-FRIEBELE Consulting Engineers Inc. Pct. Daily Daily AN PM Trips Total Trips Trips 61042 23.8%. 845 858 21164 8.5% 440 468 17,196 67.7% 31496 31716 25,402 100.0% 41781 5,042 Gross Use Tract Proposed Use Acres FAR Coverage Code 1 Garden Office 9.7 1 :1 422,532 SF 713 2 Industrial Tech 18.2 1 :2 396,396 SF 110 3 Light Indust. 72.3 1 :1 3,149,388 SF 110 TOTAL 100.2 JONES-FRIEBELE Consulting Engineers Inc. Pct. Daily Daily AN PM Trips Total Trips Trips 61042 23.8%. 845 858 21164 8.5% 440 468 17,196 67.7% 31496 31716 25,402 100.0% 41781 5,042 Attachment to: Ordinance No. 698-5-86 Adopted May -1, 1986 "Exhibit B" Gross Tract Proposed Use Acres 1 Garden Office 9.7 2 Industrial Tech 18.2 3 Light Indust. 72.3 TOTAL 100.2 JONES-FRIE=BELE Consulting Engineers Inc. TABLE 3 MINIMUM REQUIRED PARKING Trip Generation BETSY BUSH TRACT -- ALLEN, TEXAS 18,140 100.0% 3,549 31758 ITE Land Pct. Use Daily Daily AM PM FAR Coverage Code Trips Total- Trips Trips 1 12.75 1531581.SF 713 21196 12.1% 307 312 1 11.35 587,253 SF 110 31206 17.7% 652 693 1 :1.35 21332,880 SF 110 12,738 70.2% 21589 21'753 18,140 100.0% 3,549 31758 Attachment to: Ordinance No. 698-5-86 Adopted May 1, 1986 "Exhibit B" w W rz � U) C7 4-) H Q) Cr. co JONES—FRIEBELE Consulting Engineers Inc. Attachment to Ordinance No. 698-5-86 T Adopted May 1, 1986 :i "Exhibit B" - ' TABLE 4-A ALLOCATION OF SITE AREA TO PLANNING AREA Acreage of Bush Tract in Unit (i11 = 100.2 or 26.5% of Unit #11 (A) -- From Table 21, page 36, City of Allen Comprehensive Plan (B) -- Portion of Bush Tract in Neighborhood Units, by land use (C) -- Relative proportion of Bush Tract proposed land uses to total neighborhood unit plan. Neighborhood Unit N11 TABLE 4-B Acres Acres of % Site Land Allocated Site in of Use Unit 11 Unit 11 Alloc. (A) (B) (C) RES.-LDR 0 0 0.0% RES. -MDR 0 0 0.0% RES. -HDR 0 0 0.0% COMM - 8 0 0.0% OFFICE 92 9.7 10.5% INDUS 264 90.5 34.3% PSP 14 0 0.0% TOTAL 378 100.2 26.5% Acreage of Bush Tract in Unit (i11 = 100.2 or 26.5% of Unit #11 (A) -- From Table 21, page 36, City of Allen Comprehensive Plan (B) -- Portion of Bush Tract in Neighborhood Units, by land use (C) -- Relative proportion of Bush Tract proposed land uses to total neighborhood unit plan. TABLE 4-B TRIP GENERATION NEIGHBORHOOD UNIT 11 Acreage Coverage Rate Trips RES.-LDR 0.0 0 DU 10.0 Per DU 0 RES. -MDR 0.0 0 DU 10.0 Per DU 0 RES. -HDR 0.0 0 DU 6.1 Per DU 0 COMM 2.1 73,900 GSFLA 66.7 Per KGSFLA 4,929 OFFICE 24.4 1,062;311 GSF 14.3 Per KGSF 15,191 INDUS 70.0 3,048,370 GSF 5.46 Per KGSF 16,644 PSP 3.7 TOTAL 100.2 36,764 JONES - FRIEBELE Consulting Engineers Inc. Attachment to: Ordinance No. 698-5-86 Adopted May 1, 1986 "Exhibit B"_ TABLE 5 STREET CAPACITY IMPACTS Betsy Bush Tract Only JONES-FRIEBELE Consulting Engineers Inc. (A) (B) (C) Future Site Street Traffic Volume/ Capacity Projected Capacity Street/ Section (VPD) (VPD) Ratio Stacy Rd. SH 121-Ridgeview 46,400 31467 0.075 Ridgeview-Watters 46,400 41391 •0.095 Watters -US 75 461400 91002 0.194 Watters Rd. SH 121-Ridgeview 33,600 51449 0.162 Ridgeview-Site 33,600 11,025 0.328 Site -Stacy 33,600 71158 0.213 South of Stacy 33,600 31074 0.091 Ridgeview Dr. West of Stacy 33,600 1,118 0.033" Stacy -New Road 33,600 11118 0.0333 New Road -Watters 33,600 19613 0.046 Watters -US 75 33,600 31963 0.118 Column (A): Daily capacity of the planned facility at Level of Service 'C' Column (8): Site daily traffic volumes assigned to the street section. Column (C): Ratio of Column (B) to Column (A) JONES-FRIEBELE Consulting Engineers Inc. Attachment to: Ordinance No. 698-5-86 Adopted May 1, 1986 "Exhibit B" TABLE 6 AGGREGATED STREET CAPACITY IMPACTS Bryan and Betsy Bush Tracts Column (A): Daily capacity of the planned facility at Level of Service 'C' Column (B): Site daily traffic volumes,assigned to the street section. Column (Ch Ratio of Column (B) to Column (A) JONES-FRIEBELE Consulting Engineers Inc. (A) (B) (C) Future Site Street Traffic Volume/ Capacity Projected Capacity Street/ Section (VPD) (VPD) Ratio Stacy Rd. SH 121-Ridgeview 46,400 12,179 0.262 Ridgeview-Watters 461400 15,110 0.326 Watters -11S 75 46,400 18,185 0.392 Watters Rd. SH 121-Ridgeview 331608 12,685 0.378 Ridgeview-Site 33,600 19,352 0.576 Site -Stacy 33,600 15,485 0.461 South of Stacy 33,600 79293 0.217 Ridoeview Dr. West of Stacy 33,600 5,763 0.172 Stacy -New Road 33,600 6,211 0.185 New Road -Watters 33,600 11,402 0.339 Watters -()S 75 33,600 14,843 0.442 Column (A): Daily capacity of the planned facility at Level of Service 'C' Column (B): Site daily traffic volumes,assigned to the street section. Column (Ch Ratio of Column (B) to Column (A) JONES-FRIEBELE Consulting Engineers Inc. n 0 0 FIGURE 2 mBryan B m cn Betsy B m W Aggrega m r m S n 11 t-Ei P �ro a N• rt 0 Cr m N• sl (t :3:� w rt rt O 00 m CITY OF ALLEN ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS YEAR ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION �Q DRAWING(S) LOCATED HERE IN THE FILE, WERE FILMED ON A (nu er) 35MM MICROFILM ROLL. THE ORIGINAL ROLL WAS DUPLICATED, AND THE DUPLICATE ROLL LOADED INTO MICROFILM JACKETS. The 35mm microfilm jackets for the entire year are filed at the end of all 16mm microfilm jackets for that year. All 16mm and 35mm jackets are consecutively numbered. 1AC O `675 680 L.A. SA! 690 666 I� TRACT OFFICE 9.7 AC. 000011, i oe*00 D cc U 4 660 CITY OF ALLEN,,, TEXAS r� X X Ac. 6 7 0 72.3 Ac. 10.2 ►fie. i f 1AC O `675 680 L.A. SA! 690 666 I� TRACT OFFICE 9.7 AC. 000011, i oe*00 D cc U 4 660 CITY OF ALLEN,,, TEXAS r� X X Ac. 18.2 Ac. 72.3 Ac. 10.2 ►fie. i f X X f i 680 I DOYLE B. STACY OWNER: 675 IF -Am T-jw 9-- Mr A w rill rA,j r - -1 & -09 I wlr� ts mm USE Office Industrial Technology Light industrial Attachment to Ordinance No. 698-5-86 Adopted May 1, 1986 "Exhibit B" ACRES 91.7 Ac. 18.2 Ac. 72.3 Ac. 10.2 ►fie. i f f i 680 I DOYLE B. STACY OWNER: 675 IF -Am T-jw 9-- Mr A w rill rA,j r - -1 & -09 I wlr� ts mm USE Office Industrial Technology Light industrial Attachment to Ordinance No. 698-5-86 Adopted May 1, 1986 "Exhibit B" ACRES 91.7 Ac. 18.2 Ac. 72.3 Ac. 10.2 ►fie. J.T. DUNKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. URBAN PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE