O-2951-9-10ORDINANCE NO. 2951-9-10
' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALLEN, COLLIN
COUNTY, TEXAS, ("CITY") APPROVING A NEGOTIATED RESOLUTION
BETWEEN THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE ("ACSC" OR
"STEERING COMMITTEE") AND ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION
("ATMOS MID-TEX" OR "COMPANY") REGARDING THE COMPANY'S THIRD
RATE REVIEW MECHANISM ("RRM') FILING IN ALL CITIES EXERCISING
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION; DECLARING EXISTING RATES TO BE
UNREASONABLE; REQUIRING THE COMPANY TO REIMBURSE CITIES'
REASONABLE RATEMAKING EXPENSES; ADOPTING TARIFFS THAT
REFLECT RATE ADJUSTMENTS CONSISTENT WITH THE NEGOTIATED
SETTLEMENT AND FINDING THE RATES TO BE SET BY THE ATTACHED
TARIFFS TO BE JUST AND REASONABLE; APPROVING ATMOS MHl-TEX'S
PROOF OF REVENUES; EXTENDING THE RRM PROCESS FOR TWO CYCLES
AND ADOPTING A NEW BRM TARIFF; RATIFYING THE SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT, INCLUDING COST RECOVERY FOR A STEEL SERVICE LINE
REPLACEMENT PROGRAM; ADOPTING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; DETERMINING
THAT THIS ORDINANCE WAS PASSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT; REQUIRING
DELIVERY OF THIS ORDINANCE TO THE COMPANY AND THE STEERING
' COMMITTEE'S LEGAL COUNSEL; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Allen, Collin County, Texas ("City") is a gas utility customer of Atmos Energy
Corp., Mid -Tex Division ("Atmos Mid -Tex" or " Company"), and a regulatory authority with an interest in
the rates and charges of Atmos Mid -Tex; and,
WHEREAS, the City is a member of the Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC" or "Steering
Committee"), a coalition of approximately 148 similarly situated cities served by Atmos Mid -Tex that have
joined together to facilitate the review of and response to natural gas issues affecting rates charged in the
Atmos Mid -Tex service area (such participating cities are referred to herein as "ACSC Cities"); and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the agreement settling the Company's 2007 Statement of Intent to
increase rates, ACSC Cities and the Company worked collaboratively to develop a Rate Review Mechanism
("RRM") tariff that allows for an expedited rate review process controlled in a three year experiment by
ACSC Cities as a substitute to the current GRIP process instituted by the Legislature; and,
WHEREAS, the City took action in 2008 to approve a Settlement Agreement with Atmos Mid -Tex resolving
the Company's 2007 rate case and authorizing the RRM Tariff; and,
WHEREAS, the 2008 Settlement Agreement contemplates reimbursement of ACSC Cities' reasonable
expenses associated with RRM applications; and,
WHEREAS, on or about March 15, 2010, Atmos Mid -Tex filed with the City its third application pursuant to
' the RRM tariff to increase natural gas base rates by approximately $70.2 million, such increase to be effective
in every municipality that has adopted the RRM tariff within its Mid -Tex Division; and,
WHEREAS, ACSC Cities coordinated its review of Atmos Mid-Tex's REM filing by designating a
Settlement Committee made up of ACSC representatives, assisted by ACSC attorneys and consultants, to
resolve issues identified by ACSC in the Company's REM filing; and,
WHEREAS, the Company has filed evidence that existing rates are unreasonable and should be changed;
and,
WHEREAS, independent analysis by ACSC's rate expert concluded that Atmos Mid -Tex is able to justify an
increase over current rates of $21 million; and,
WHEREAS, Atmos Mid -Tex has commenced a program to replace steel service lines based on a relative leak
repair risk analysis; and,
WHEREAS, the Steering Committee has entered a Settlement Agreement ("Exhibit C" to this Ordinance)
with Atmos Mid -Tex to: (1) increase base rate revenues by $27 million; (2) extend the REM process, with
modifications for an additional two cycles and to thereafter require the filing of a system -wide Statement of
Intent rate case on or before June 1, 2013; and (3) in the interim to allow current recovery of incremental
direct costs of the steel service line replacement program in rates set via this ordinance and in future RRMs;
and,
WHEREAS, the ACSC Executive Committee, as well as ACSC lawyers and consultants, recommend that
ACSC members approve the attached rate tariffs ("Exhibit A" to this Ordinance), which will increase the
Company's revenue requirement by $27 million; and,
WHEREAS, the attached tariffs implementing new rates and Atmos Mid-Tex's Proof of Revenues ("Exhibit
B" to this Ordinance) are consistent with the negotiated resolution reached by ACSC Cities and are just,
' reasonable, and in the public interest; and,
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the parties that if the City determines any rates, revenues, terms and
conditions, or benefits resulting from a Final Order or subsequent negotiated settlement approved in any
proceeding addressing the issues raised in the Company's Third REM filing would be more beneficial to the
City than the terms of the attached tariff, then the more favorable rates, revenues, terms and conditions, or
benefits shall additionally accrue to the City; and,
WHEREAS, the negotiated resolution of the Company's REM filing and the resulting rates are, as a whole,
in the public interest.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALLEN,
TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. The findings set Forth in this Ordinance are hereby in all things approved.
SECTION 2. The City Council finds the existing rates for natural gas service provided by Atmos Mid -Tex
are unreasonable and new tariffs and Atmos Mid-Tex's Proof of Revenues, which are attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibits A and B, arejust and reasonable and are hereby adopted.
SECTION 3. Atmos Mid -Tex shall reimburse the reasonable ratemaking expenses of the ACSC Cities in
processing the Company's rate application.
' SECTION 4. The Settlement Agreement, attached as Exhibit C, which includes in addition to resolution of
the Third RRM: (1) extension of a modified REM process; (2) requirement that Atmos Mid -Tex file a
system -wide Statement of Intent rate case on or before June 1, 2013; and (3) current recovery of incremental
direct costs for a steel service line replacement program, is hereby ratified.
Ordinance No. 2951-9-10, Page 2
SECTION 5. To the extent any resolution or ordinance previously adopted by the Council is inconsistent
with this Ordinance, it is hereby repealed.
' SECTION 6. The meeting at which this Ordinance was approved was in all things conducted in strict
compliance with the Texas Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code, Chapter 551.
SECTION 7. If any one or more sections or clauses of this Ordinance is adjudged to be unconstitutional or
invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remaining provisions of this Ordinance and
the remaining provisions of the Ordinance shall be interpreted as if the offending section or clause never
existed.
SECTION 8. If the City determines any rates, revenues, terms and conditions, or benefits resulting from a
Final Order or subsequent negotiated settlement approved in any proceeding addressing the issues raised in
the Company's Third RRM filing would be more beneficial to the City than the terms of the attached tariff,
then the more favorable rates, revenues, terms and conditions, or benefits shall additionally accrue to the City.
SECTION 9. A copy of this Ordinance shall be sent to Atmos Mid-Tex, care of David Park, Vice President
Rates and Regulatory Affairs, at Atmos Energy Corporation, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1862, Dallas, Texas
75240, and to Geoffrey Gay, General Counsel to ACSC, at Lloyd Gosselink Rochelle & Townsend, P.C.,
P.O. Box 1725, Austin, Texas 78767-1725.
SECTION 10. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage with rates authorized by
attached Tariffs to be effective for bills rendered on or after October 1, 2010.
DULY PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALLEN, COLLIN
COUNTY, TEXAS, ON THIS THE 28ra DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2010.
APPROVED:
4QL
StephelfTerrell, MAYOR
1
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
Peter G. Smith, CITY ATTORNEY Shelley B. Georg , TRMC, CITY SEC41ETARY
Ordinance No. 2951-9-10, Page 3
F
ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
MID-TEX DIVISION
RATE SCHEDULE:
R— RESIDENTIAL SALES
APPLICABLE TO:
All Cities except the City of Dallas and all unincorporated areas
EFFECTIVE DATE:
Bills Rendered on or after 1 010112 01 0
Application
Applicable to Residential Customers for all natural gas provided at one Point of Delivery and measured
through one meter.
Type of Semi"
Where service of the type desired by Customer is not already available at the Point of Delivery, additional
charges and special contract arrangements between Company and Customer may be required prior to
service being furnished.
Monthly Rate
Customers monthly bill will be calculated by adding the following Customer and Md charges to the
amounts due under the riders listed below:
Charge
Amount
Customer Charge per Bill
$ 7.15 per month
Commodity Charge — All Mcf
$2.5246 per Mcl
' Gas Cost Recovery. Plus an amount for gas costs and upstream transportation costs calculated
in accordance wnh Part (a) and Part (b), respectively, of Rider GCR
Weather Normalization Adjustment: Plus or Minus an amount for weather normalization
calculated in accordance with Rider W NA.
1
Rate Review Mechanism: Plus or Minus an amount for rates as calculated in accordance with
Rider FIRM.
Franchise Fee Adjustment: Plus an amount for franchise fees calculated in accordance with Rider
FF. Rider FF is only applicable to customers inside the corporate limits of any incorporated
municipality.
Tax Adjustment. Plus an amount for tax calculated in accordance with Rider TAX_
Surcharges: Plus an amount for surcharges calculated in accordance with the applicable nder(s).
Agreement
An Agreement for Gas Service may be required.
Notice
Service hereunder and the rates for services provided are subject to the orders of regulatory bodies
having jurisdiction and to the Company's Tariff for Gas Service_
EXHIBIT A
Ordinance No. 2951-9-10, Page 4
I
ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
MID-TEX DIVISION
RATE SCHEDULE:
C—COMMERCIAL SALES
APPLICABLE TO:
All Cities except the City of Dallas and all unincorporated areas
EFFECTIVE DATE:
Bills Rendered on or after 10/0112010
Application
Applicable to Commercial Customers for all natural gas provided at one Point of Delivery and measured
through one meter and to industrial Customers with an average annual usage of less than 3,000 Mcf
Type of Service
Where service of the type desired by Customer is not already available at the Point of Delivery, additional
charges and special contract arrangements between Company and Customer may be required prior to
service being furnished.
Monthly Rate
Customees monthly bill will be calculated by adding the following Customer and Mcf charges to the
amounts due under the nders listed below:
Charge
Amount
Customer Charge per Bill
$ 13.91 per month
Commodity Charge - All Mcf
$ 1.0796 per Mcf
Gas Cost Recovery: Plus an amount for gas costs and upstream transportation costs calculated
in accordance with Part (a) and Part (b), respectively, of Rider GCR.
Weather Normalization Adjustment: Plus or Minus an amount for weather normalization
calculated in accordance with Rider WNA.
Rate Review Mechanism: Plus or Minus an amount for rates as calculated in accordance with
Rider RRM.
Franchise Fee Adjustment: Plus an amount for franchise fees calculated in accordance with Rider
FF. Rider FF is only applicable to customers inside the corporate limits of any incorporated
municipality.
Tax Adjustment Plus an amount for tax calculated in accordance with Rider TAX.
Surcharges: Plus an amount for surcharges calculated in accordance with the applicable nder(s).
Agreement
An Agreement for Gas Service may be required.
Notice
Service hereunder and the rates for services provided are subject to the orders of regulatory bodies
having jurisdiction and to the Company's Tariff for Gas Service.
EXHIBIT A
Ordinance No. 2951-9-10, Page 5
I
ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
MID-TEX DIVISION
RATE SCHEDULE:
I — INDUSTRIAL SALES
APPLICABLE TO:
All Cities except the City of Dallas and all unincorporated areas
EFFECTIVE DATE:
Bills Rendered on or after 1 0101 /201 0
Next 3,500 Mill
Application
Applicable to Industrial Customers with a maximum daily usage (MDU) of less than 3,500 MMBtu per day
for all natural gas provided at one Point of Delivery and measured through one meter. Service for
Industrial Customers with an MDU equal to or greater than 3,500 MMBtu per day will be provided at
Company's sole option and will require special contract arrangements between Company and Customer.
Type of Service
Where service of the type desired by Customer is not already available at the Point of Delivery, additional
charges and special contract arrangements between Company and Customer may be required prior to
service being furnished.
Monthly Rate
Customer's monthly bill will be calculated by adding the following Customer and MMBtu charges to the
amounts due under the riders listed below:
Charge
Amount
Customer Charge per Meter
$ 450.00 per month
First 0 MMBtu to 1,500 MMBtu
$ 0.2750 per MMBtu
Next 3,500 Mill
$ 0 2015 per MMBtu
All Mill over 5,000 MMBtu
$ 0.0433 per MMBtu
Gas Cost Recovery: Plus an amount for gas costs and upstream transportation costs calculated
in accordance with Part (a) and Part (b), respectively, of Rider GCR.
Rate Review Mechanism: Plus or Minus an amount for rates as calculated in accordance with
Rider RRM.
Franchise Fee Adjustment Plus an amount for franchise fees calculated in accordance with Rider
FF. Rider FF is only applicable to customers inside the corporate limits of any incorporated
municipality.
Tax Adjustment: Plus an amount for tax calculated in accordance with Rider TAX.
Surcharges: Plus an amount for surcharges calculated in accordance with the applicable nder(s).
Curtailment Overpull Fee
Upon notification by Company of an event of curtailment or interruption of Customer's deliveries,
Customer will, for each MMBtu delivered in excess of the stated level of curtailment or interruption, pay
' Company 200% of the midpoint price for the Katy point listed in Plaits Gas Daily published for the
applicable Gas Day in the table entitled "Daily Price Survey.'
EXHIBIT A
Ordinance No. 2951-9-10, Page 6
I
ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
MID•TEX DIVISION
RATE SCHEDULE:
I—INDUSTRIAL SALES
APPLICABLE TO:
All Chios except the City of Dallas and all unincorporated areas
EFFECTIVE DATE:
Bills Rendered on or after 10101/2010
Replacement Index
In the event the "midpoint' or "common' price for the Katy point listed in Platts Gas Daiy in the table
entitled "Daily Price Survey' is no longer published, Company will calculate the applicable imbalance fees
utilizing a daily price index recognized as authoritative by the natural gas industry and most closely
approximating the applicable index.
Agreement
An Agreement for Gas Service may be required.
Notice
Service hereunder and the rates for services provided are subject to the orders of regulatory bodies
having jurisdiction and to the Company's Tariff for Gas Service.
Special Conditions
' In order to receive service under Rate I, Customer must have the type of meter required by Company.
Customer must pay Company all costs associated with the acquisition and installation of the meter.
1
EXHIBIT A
Ordinance No. 2951-9-10. Page 7
I
ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TE%DIVISION
Line
No.
SUMMARY OF CURRENT AND PROPOSED RATE STRUCTURE
TEST YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2009
(2010 RRM SETTLEMENT PROPOSAL)
Proposed
(Beginning
Description Current Oct 1)
(a)
16)
(d)
1
Rate R
2
Customer Charge per month
$7.00
$7.00
3
4
Consumption Charge per MCF
$2.2647
$2.5246
5
2008 RRM True -up per MCF
$0.0000
$0.0000
6
2009 RRM True -up per MCFO$
0060w
0000
7
Total Consumption Charge per MCF
$2.2707
$2.5246
6
Rate C
9
Customer Charge per month
$13.50
$13.50
10
11
Consumption Charge per MCF
$0.9825
$10796
12
2008 RRM True -up per MCF
$0-0000
$0.0000
13
2009 RRM True -up per MCF
$0.0052
SO.0IX70
14
Total Consumption Charge per MCF
$0.9877
$1.0796
15
Rate 18 T
16
Customer Charge per month
$425.00
$450.00
17
18
Consumption Charge per MMBTU:
19
First 1,500 MMBTU
$0.2496
$0.2750
20
Next 3,500 MMBTU
$0.1820
50.2015
21
Over 5,000 MMBTU
$0.0390
$0.0433
22
2008 RRM True -up, per MMBTU:
23
First 1,500 MMBTU
50.0087
$0.0000
24
Next 3,500 MMBTU
S00064
$0.0000
25
Over 5,000 MMBTU
50-0014
$0.0000
26
2009 RRM True -up per MMBTU:
27
First 1,500 MMBTU
50.0000
$0.00D0
28
Next 3,500 MMBTU
50.0000
$0.0000
29
Over 5,000 MMBTU
$0.0000
$0 .0000
30
Total Consumption Charge per MMBTU
31
First 1,500 MMBTU
50.2583
$0.2750
32
Next 3,500 MMBTU
$0.1884
$0.2015
33
Over 5,000 MMBTU
50.0404
50.0433
EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No. 2951-9-10, Page 8
I
F
ATMOS ENERGY CORP.. MID-TEX DIAS40N
CUSTOMER IMPACT OF PROPOSED RATES COMPARED TO CURRENT RATES
TEST YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31. 2009
(2010 FIRM SE EMENT PROP03ALI
Line Pmsp.aw.
No. Oa*cmpnon Raw bma.a
Ia( (b)
1 Raw R
2 CorwOmp9M Grunge per MCF
3
Change TOM Cumem Raw
502539
4
alling UMIs Qon 5peaeie0 PencO
75.W%MD
5
Total Charge In Base Revenue
51%934,212
6
Asscclate6 ReYMUe Tames
51.490.4431
T
TOQ1 R * IMP=
521A24,613
5
Numcer Y BIW ten SpeOI Penoo
1]267.740
9
N:"age Impact W Dil
$1.24
10
Raw C
11
Conal p--Jw Change l'Rr MCF
12
Change TOM Current Raw
50.0919
43
&Iling Units Ta SpeaTeO Penm
49,==O
14
Total Change In Base RevenUe
54.547.0 O
15
PbKdaw6 Revemm T.,
SM%%6
16
TOUT Race Imp=
54,587,026
17
Number al Bl% Ita npeclT. dP MM
J*i5A36
18
N arage Impact per all
SJ.36
19
Rates MT - Customer Changs
20
Customer Change
21
Change imm Current Raw
525.00
M
Blling Unhhs •a SpeotRO PenW
10.965
23
TOMI Change In Base Revenue
5274.E25
M
ASSoclawa Re:Mue Thies25
0533
211
TOW Rase Imp=
52-'SAE761
M
Raw* IBT- let black
2]
COmmMpmh Change per MCF
26
Change TOM CUnem Rale
30.0167
29
1511ing Units Tx SFecMe01OuIW
10.597.655
30
Total Change In Bane Revenue
5177.01
31
AssocI Revenue T..$13236
32
Tow; Rase IMP=
S190.256
M
R.N. MIT -Ind black
34
Cou mpJon Charge per MCF
35
change Tom COMM Raw
50.0131
36
auing Untie Ta spetlT40 FeMW
10.791216
37
TOUT Change In Base Re.YOUe
$141.297
38
OSSOO teC Re'lehue Tales1s
GMA
39
TOM? Ra.e Impact
$351.862
40
Rates 14T -&A block
41
Coasumppm Charge per MCF
42
Change Tom Cunem Raw
SoM9
d3
B11mg JnllsT 0peobe0 PenoO
16.,285.623
44
Total Charge In Baa Revenue
33].655
45
Aaccl.teO Re:Mue Tait.
3131
46
Total Rase Impact.
551.218
47
Rates IST - Total
M
TOW R311e IMP=
SE66.FA4
49
NUROer V Elie W SpiI FFlIW
1D.MS
59
A':erage ImpaOt pen all
562.68
51
52
Total Change In Ba*e Revenu.
$25.121.880
53
Total Raw Impact (Inc, Rev. Tama)
1127.00.142
EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No. 2951-9-10, Page 9
EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No. 2951-9-10, Page 10
ATMOS ENERGY
CORP.-
MID -TU
DIV131ON
'
AVERAGE BILL
COMPARISON -OCTOBER 1.2010
TEST YEAR
ENDING DECEMBER
31, NO
meemzio+D
—ansa en
cuwwr
a..sa n.p
a
wr
uzmr •
awun Ma
sarranr rw,
N+v
x
Da+.n
rmu¢r,e.y.
+cr
ussw
I+r
U
AbGCnnNa
.S
NmA
sma
eral
PIEW
nr,
xn„
n Mrceue+Nr
wswr
a
ua.+..nme•
mm
w..arme.v.
cr
man
am
wllMa
r�
cr
Nem .
asr
n
m+we Me
vz
cr
x
mart -
m
a
i
s.1CYl
)'pm
m w.�+.Y
sa+er
n
Dwm -
s
n
n)mu'gne.p
yr
cr
uvla .
Mxa[n Mt
Nmm .
W.+xnlwee
ux
cr
x
aew .
x
ml�iRtl�pu
cuww,
nwaeev
V
N]fm
a
r..m,ae.p
w+v
mam .
+D
tl
Cwigmtly
wN
m➢YY •
Hm
ImrreCRMt
.t
IWwa Me
],0.'
wN
F
mMl
M
rW
m
r�� tivP
WUWntl.4
I!a
IDSM
p,�.sa pip
Ip]
wN
Wa+!
]W
wN
NOY
'AC6el
lav
wN
F
IDem
+w
)wzl�
ulv
m
mrevx ewry
cunan
rewmrD
auwe
ura,., ep
)mm
m
n..n..��.>
wN
mm •
r�e.p
IIDt
wN
ID+W
]IDs
m
v
wN
IDvm,
vm
mmea
+.+n..a.�•.Y
mma
+
ew.vr .
sra.+. ev.
sam
w..Ne,a.p
ID]na .
fw'eW �.p
+D
_wN
NA+E
Ia9
n
wN
mD,a
]N
wN
F
IDam
N
EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No. 2951-9-10, Page 10
I
1
n
ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION
CUSTOMER IMPACT OF PROPOSED RATES COMPARED TO CURRENT RATES
(STEEL S ERVICE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM)
Line
Prospective
No.
Description
Rate Increase
(a)
(h)
1
Rate R
2
Monthly Customer Charge
3
Change from Current late
50.15
4
billing UnIG tow Specilled Period
17,287;740
5
Total Cr,3rye In Base Revenue
52,593,161
6
Associated Revenue Taxes
51931880
7
Total Rale Impact
52,787,041
8
Numoer of Bl1sfor Spedlvd Period
17287,740
9
kweinitpe Impact per all
$0.15
10
Rate C
11
MontnlyCustomHCharge
12
Change from Current Rate
$0.41
13
ailing Units for Sped -52d Period
IA45A36
14
Total Change In Base Revenue
$592,529
15
Associated Revenue Tabs
$44,308
16
Total Rale impaa
5636,937
17
Number if Bits for Specified Period
1,445A36
18
Average Impact per Flit
$0.44
19
2D
Total Change In Bass Revenue
$3,185,790
21
Total Rata Impact )Inc. Rev. Taxes)
53A23,979
22
EXHIBIT B
Ordinance No. 2951-9-10, Page 11
SETTLEMENT AGREE\IENT BETWEENATMOS ENERGY CORP., 11111-TEX
'
DIVISION AND ADIOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, this settlement agreement is entered into by Atmos Energy Corp's Mid -
Tex Division and Atmos Cities Steering Committee ('ACSC") whose members include the
Cities of Abilene. Addison. Allen. Alvarado. Angus. Anna. Argyle. Arlington, Bedford,
Belhuead.. Benbrook. Beverly Hills. Blossom, Blue Ridge. Bowie, Boyd, Bridgeport,
Brownwood, Buffalo. Burkbrmett, Burleson. Caddo Mills, Carrollton, Cedar Hill. Celeste,
Celina. Cisco, Cleburne, Clyde. College Station. Colleyville, Colorado City. Comanche,
Coolidge, Coppell, Corinth. Corral City. Crandall. Crowley, Dalworthington Gardens, Denison,
DeSoto, Duncanville. Eastland, Edgecliff Village. Emory. Eris, Euless, Everman. Fairview.
Facers Branch. Fannersville, Fate. Flower Mound. Forest Hill, Fort Worth, Frisco, Frost.
Gainesville, Garland, Garrett. Grand Prairie, Grapevine, Haltom City, Harker Heights. Haskell.
Hewitt, Highland Park. Highland Village. Honey Grove, Hurst. Imva Park, Irving, Justin.
Kaufirn, Keene. Keller, Kemp, Keredale. Kerrville, Killeen. Knr. Lakeside. Lake Worth.
Lancaster, Lewisville, Lincoln Park. Little Elm. Loren, Malakoff, Mansfield, McKinney,
Melissa Mesquite. Midlothian. Murphy, Nocona. North Richland Hills, Northlake. Oakleaf.
Ovilla, Palestine, Pantego, Paris, Parker, Pecan Hill, Plano. Ponder, Pottsboro, Prosper. Quitman,
Red Oak. Reno (Parker County), Richardson, Richland, Richland Hills, Roanoke. Robinson,
Rockwall, Roscoe. Rowlett. Sachse. Saginaw, Seagoville, Shenrmn. Snyder. Southlake.
Springtoum. Stamford. Stephenville, Sulphur Springs, Sweetwater, Temple, Terrell. The Colony,
Tyler. University Park. Venus. Vernon, Waco.. Watauga. Waxahachie. Westlake. Whitesboro.
White Settlement. Wichita Falls. Woodway, and Wylie.
WHEREAS our March 15, 2010, Atmos Sled with the ACSC Cities an application.
hereafter referred to as the 2010 RRM filing, to adjust rates pursuant to Rider RRM - Rate
Review Mechanism: and
' WHEREAS. ACSC has hired experts mid lawyers to analyze the rates proposed by
Antos Energy Corp.'s. Mid -Tex Division ("Atmos" or `Company') in its 2010 RRM filing: and
[l
WHEREAS, the Settlement Agreement resolves all issues between Amos and ACSC
("the Signatories') regarding the 2010 RRM filing, which is currentlypending before the .4CSC
Cities, in a manner that the Signatories believe is consistent with the public interest, mrd the
Signatories represent diverse interests. and
WHEREAS, the Signatories believe that the resolution of the issues raised in the 2010
RRM filing can best be accomplished by each ACSC City approving this Settlement Agreement
and the rates. temrs and conditions reflected in die tariffs attached to this Settlement Agreement
as Exhibit A:
NOW. THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements and covenants
established herein, the Signatories. through their undersigned representatives, agree to the
following Settlement Terms as a means of fully resolving all issues between the ACSC Cities
and Atmos involving the 2010 RRM filing:
EXHIBIT C
Ordinance No. 2951-9-10, Page 12
Settlement Tetras
' 1. Upon the execution of this Settlement Agreement, Atmos and the counsel for the
ACSC cities will recommend that an ordinance or resolution be adopted to approve
this Settlement Agreement and implement the rates. terms and conditions reflected in
the tariffs attached to this Settlement Agreement as Exhibit A. (Attachment A to the
Ordinance ratifying this Agreement). Said tariffs should allow Atmos an additional.
prospective $27 million in annual revenue by implementation of rates shown in the
proof of revenues attached as Exhibit B. (Attachment B to the Ordinance ratifying this
Agreement). The uniform implementation of gas rates, terms and conditions
established by this Settlement Agreement shall be effective for bills rendered on or
after October 1, 2010.
In an effort to streamline the regulatory review process. Atmos and ACSC have agreed
to renew the Rate Review Mechanism ("Rider RRM") for a period commencing with
the Company's April 1. 2011 filing trader this mechanism for the calendar year 2010.
effective August 15, 2011. and concluding upon the implementation of new. final rates
established pursuant to the general rate case that Atmos will file on or before June 1.
2013. Rider RRM provides for an annual rate adjustment to reflect changes in billing
determinants, operating and maintenance expense. depreciation expense, other taxes
expense, and revenues as well as changes in capital investment and associated changes
in gross revenue related taxes. The revised RRM tariff is included in Exhibit A.
3. Notwithstanding the RRM rate adjustments that will occur pursuant to paragraph 2 of
' this Settlement Agreement, Atmos and ACSC agree that on or before June 1. 2013,
Atmos shall file a general. system -wide rate case for the Mid -Tex Division. Dining
the pendency of the general rate case, Atmos and ACSC agree that rate adjustments
associated with the RRM filing for calendar year 2011 shall be implemented on
August 15, 2012, and shall remain in effect until the earlier of either the issuance of a
foal order by the Railroad Commission of Texas in the general rate case to be filed on
or before June 1, 2013, or the entry of an agreed upon order resolving all issues
involved in the general rate case. The adjustments made or requested in the 5's year
RRM shall not be considered precedent during the general rate case.
Atmos and ACSC further agree that for the period commencing March 1. 2010
through September 30. 2012, Atmos will expand its existing steel service line
replacement program to complete the replacement of 100.000 steel service lines within
its Mid -Tex Division during this period. Atmos and ACSC agree that a risk-based
approach should be adopted to allow replacement of the highest priority steel service
lines within this time period. Atmos agrees to provide the ACSC cities with quarterly
reports providing the number and location of the lines replaced during the quarter.
Atmos agrees to coordinate with ACSC member cilia to minimize disruption to cities'
tights of way without compromising the safety of residents of the cities.
5. Atmos and ACSC agree that costs incurred to replace steel service lilies prior to
October 1, 2010 shall be included in the RRM rate adjustment calculation for the 2010
' calendar year, and shall not be subject to or included in the rate cap limitations set
forth in subsection IV (a) -(b) of the Rider RRM tariff.
Ordinance No. 2951-9-10, Page 13
6. Atmos and ACSC agree that the projected incremental direct costs incurred to replace
' steel service lines on or after October 1. 2010 shall be separately identified and shall
not be subject to or included in the rate cap limitations set forth in subsection N (a) -
(b) of the Rider RRM tariff. Atmos and ACSC further agree that such projected direct
incremental costs incurred to replace steel service lines after October 1, 2010, shall be
separately calculated and recovered as a discrete component of customer charges in the
Company's annual RRM filings as set forth below:
Atmos and ACSC agree that Atmos shall be entitled to separately adjust rates for
the Rate Effective Period as defused in the Rider RRM tariff to allow recovery of
the projected annual revenue requirement associated with direct incremental costs
to be incurred in connection with a steel service line replacement program, that
are not otherwise included within the RRM cost of service, including a return on
equity of 9.0% within the overall weighted cost of capital applied to net
investment (net plant additions, less accumulated depreciation and accumulated
deferred income taxes), depreciation expense and applicable taxes:
b. Atmos and ACSC further agrec that the capital structure used to calculate the steel
service line replacement rate adjustment will be the actual Evaluation Period (as
defined in the Rider RRM tariff) ratio of long-term debt and equity. with an
equity percentage not to exceed 50%;
c. Rate recoveryassociated with a steel service line replacement program shall occur
through an adjustment to the Residential and Commercial customer charges.
' Current year recovery factors as of October 1. 2010 shall be $0.15 for residential
customers and $0.41 for commercial customers. The rates will be adjusted
annually. however. Atmos and ACSC agree that in no case will the per customer
monthly cost recovery factors attributable to a steel service line replacenment
program exceed $0.44 for residential customers or $1.22 for commercial
customers, either prior to or during the pendency of the general rate case Atmos
will file on or before June 1. 2013.
d. Atmos and ACSC further agree that any per customer amount attributable to cost
recovery for a steel service line replacement program shall be subject to review by
the regulatory authority in a subsequent Evaluation Period as defined in the Rider
RRM tariff and all incremental costs associated with a steel service lux
replacement program shall be subject to a prudence/reasonableness review in the
general rate case to be filed by Atmos on or before June 1, 2013.
7. With respect to the Company's annual RRM filings. Atmos agrees to pay all
reasonable and accessary expenses of each entity having original jurisdiction that are
incurred to review the Company's annual RRM filings. Atmos farther agrees that in
calculating the proposed rate for any Rate Effective Period. the Company shall not
include: (1) any external legal. expert. or consultant costs to prepare and,'or provide
supportive information related to its filing: or (2) reimbursements to original
jurisdiction entities.
' 8. Notwithstanding paragraph 7 of this Settlement Agreement, Atmos and ACSC agree
that in the event of an appeal of an original jurisdiction entity's decision regarding a
proposed RRM adjustment recovery of rate case expenses shall be determined
3
CXHHH'IC
Ordinance No. 2951-9-10, Page 14
according to Chapters 103 and 104, TEX. UID.. CODE ANN. Further, in the event of
' such appeal(s). Atmos shall recover any reimbursement made to the original
jurisdiction entity through a surcharge to all customer rates that are subject to the
Commission's jurisdiction in that proceeding or proceedings that might be joined
therewith. regardless of whether such renubuusements are made during the initial
review period or appeal period.
9. The ACSC Cities agree that they will not challenge the legal basis of the rates, terms.
and conditions reflected in Exhibit A, or any annual RRM adjustment that is
implemented pursuant to Rider RRM.
10. Atmos and the ACSC Cities further agree that the express terns of the Rider RRM me
supplemental to the filing. notice, regulatory review, or appellate procedural process of
the ratemaking provisions of Chapter 104 of the Texas Utilities Code. If the statute
requires a mandatory action on behalf of the municipal regulatory authority or Atmos.
the paries will follow the provisions of such statute. If the statute allows discretion on
behalf of the municipal regulatory authority, the ACSC Cities agree that they shall
exercise such discretion in such a way as to implement the provisions of the RRM
tariff. If Atmos appeals an action or inaction of an ACSC City regarding an RRM
Sling to the Railroad Commission. the ACSC Cities agree that they will not oppose the
implementation of interim rates or advocate the imposition of a bond by Atmos
consistent with the RRM tariff. Atmos agrees that it will make no Slings on behalf of
its Mid -Tex division under the provisions of TEX. UTD.. CODE ANN. ss 104.301 while
the Rider RRM is in place. hr the event that a regulatory authority fails to act or enters
' an adverse decision regardiug the proposed annual RRM adjustment, the Railroad
Commission of Texas shall. pursuant to the provisions of the Texas Utilities Code.
have exclusive appellate jurisdiction to review the action or inaction of the regulatory
authority exercising exclusive original jurisdiction over the RRM request. In addition.
the Signatories agree that this Settlement Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver
of the ACSC Cities' right to initiate a show cause proceeding or the Company's right
to file a Statement of Intent under the provisions of the Texas Utilities Code.
11. Atmos and ACSC further agree that the ordinance or resolution adopting this
Settlement Agreement shall include a provision authorizing Atmos to establish
regulatory asset account(s) for costs related to working gas in storage. Atmos and
ACSC further agree that the language authorizing these regulatory asset account(s)
shall be the same as that set forth in the 4m Ordering Paragraph (Page 10 of 11) of the
Final Order Nunc Pro Tunc issued by Railroad Commission of Texas in GUD No.
9869 on February 23, 2010. This language states as follows:
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Atmos shall be allowed to establish a
regulatory asset for the ad valorem taxes related to working gas in storage.
In addition, Atmos shall be allowed to establish a regulatory asset for (1)
the costs associated with Accumulated Deferred Income Tax for UNICAP
Section 263A. (2) the WACOG to FIFO change, and (3) an amount equal
to the rate of rennin approved in this RRM Proceeding for the
Accumulated Deferred Income Tax items related to working gas in
' storage. Atmos shall record these amounts in Other Regulatory Assets
(Account 182.3). These deferred items shall be considered, along with the
EXHIBIT C
Ordinance No. 2951-9-10, Page 15
investment in working gas, for consideration and possible inclusion in
rates for Atmos Pipelive-Texas in that entity's next filed rate case. If the
Commission determines that such deferred items aro not properly included
in the rates of Atmos Pipeline — Texas, the items shall be further deferred
until the next Atmos Mid -Tex rate case filed after the final decision in the
Atmos Pipeline Texas rate case for inclusion with the working gas
investment in the Atmos Mid -Tex mates.
12. Antics and ACSC agree that each ACSC city should approve this Settlement
Agreement and adopt an ordinance or resolution to implementfor the ACSC Cities the
rates, terms, mid conditions reflected in the tariffs attached to this Settlement
Agreement as Exhibit A. as well as the regulatory asset authorization language
discussed in paragraph 12 of this Settlement Agreement.
13. The Signatories agree that the terms of the Settlement Agreement are interdependent
and indivisible, and that if any ACSC city enters an order that is inconsistent with this
Settlement Agreement, then any Signatory may withdraw without being dcevcd to
have waived any procedural right or to have taken any substantive position on any fact
or issue by virtue of that Signatory's entry into the Settlement Agreement or its
subsequent withdrawal. If any ACSC city rejects this Settlement Agrcencm, then this
Settlement Agreement shall be void ab initio and counsel for the ACSC Cities shall
thereafter only take such actions as are in accordance with the Texas Disciplinary
Rules of Professional Conduct.
' 14. The Signatories agree that all negotiations, discussions and conferences related to the
Settlement Agreement are privileged, inadmissible, mid not relevant to prove any
issues associated with Atmos' 2010 RRM filing.
15. The Signatories agree that neither this Settlement Agreement nor any oral or written
statements made during the course of settlement negotiations may be used for any
purpose other than as necessary to support the entry by the ACSC Cites of an
ordinance or resolution implementing this Settlement Agreement.
16. The Signatories agree that this Settlement Agreement is binding on each Signatory
only for the purpose of setting the issues set forth herein and for no other purposes.
and. except to the extent the Settlement Agreement governs a Signatory's rights and
obligations for future periods, this Settlement Agreement shall not be binding or
precedential upon a Signatory outside this proceeding.
17. The Signatories agree that this Settlement Agreement may be executed in multiple
commterparts and maybe filed with facsimile signatures.
EXHIBIT C
Ordinance No. 2951-9-10, Page 16
U
1
Agreed to this _ day of August, 2010.
ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION
By
Jolm A. Paris
President, Mid -Tex Division
EXHIBIT C
Ordinance No. 2951-9-10, Page 17
Agreed to this day of August 2010.
ATTORNEY FOR ATMOS TEXAS MUNICIPALITIES, WHOSE MEMBERS INCLUDE
THE CITIES OF ABILENE. ADDISON, ALLEN, ALVARADO. ANGUS. ANNA, ARGYLE,
ARLINGTON.. BEDFORD. BELLMEAD, BE\BROOK, BEVERLY HILLS. BLOSSOM,
BLUE RIDGE, BOWIE. BOYD. BRIDGEPORT, BROWNWOOD. BUFFALO.
BURKBURNETT, BURLESON. CADDO MILLS. CARROLLTON, CEDAR HILL.
CELESTE, CELINA. CISCO, CLEBURNE, CLYDE, COLLEGE STATION, COLLEYVE.LE.
COLORADO CITY, COMANCHE. COOLIDGE, COPPELL, CORINTH. CORRAL CITY.
CRANDALL. CROWLEY. DALWORTHINGTON GARDENS. DENISON. DESOTO,
DUNCANVILLE, EASTLAND. EDGECLIFF VILLAGE, EMORY. ENNIS. EULESS,
EVERMAN, FAIRVIEW, FARMERS BRANCH, FARMERSVILLE, FATE. FLOWER
MOUND. FOREST HILL. FORT WORTH, FRISCO, FROST. GAINESVILLE, GARLAND.
GARRETT. GRAND PRAIRIE. GRAPEVINE. HALTOM CITY. FARKER HEIGHTS,
HASKELL. HEWITT. HIGHLAND PARK, HIGHLAND VILLAGE. HONEY GROVE,
HURST, IOWA PARK. IRVING, JUSTIN. KAUFMAN. KEENE. KELLER KEMP.
KENNEDALE, KERRVILLE. KILLEEN, KRUM. LAKESIDE, LAKE WORTH,
LANCASTER LEWISVILLE, LINCOLN PARK. LITTLE ELM, LORENA, MALAKOFF.
MANSFIELD, MCKINNEY, MELISSA. MESQUITE. MIDLOTHIAN, MURPHY, NOCONA.
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. NORTHLAKE, OAKLEAF. OVILLA, PALESTINE.
PANTEGO, PARIS, PARKER PECAN HILL. PLANO, PONDER, POTTSBORO. PROSPER.
QUITMAN, RED OAK. RENO (PARKER COUNTY), RICHARDSON, RICHLAND,
RICHLAND HILLS, ROANOKE, ROBINSON, ROCKWALL, ROSCOE, ROWLETT.
SACHSE. SAGINAW, SEAGOVILLE. SHERMAN. SNYDER, SOUTHLAKE.
SPRINGTOWN, STAMFORD, STEPHENVILLE, SULPHUR SPRINGS, SWEETWATER-
TEMPLE. TERRELL, THE COLONY, TYLER UNIVERSITY PARK. VENUS. VERNON,
WACO. WATAUGA. WAXAHACHIE. WESTLAKE. WHITESBORO. WHITE
SETTLEMENT, WICHITA FALLS, \VOODWAY, AND WYLIE
By:
Geoffrey Gay'
" Subject to approval by ACSC City Councils
EXHIBIT C
Ordinance No. 2951-9-10, Page 18