The URL can be used to link to this page

O-2421-7-05ORDINANCE NO. 2421-7-05 ' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALLEN, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION, MID-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION, MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH TIM ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION, MID-TEX DMSION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corporation, Mid -Tex Division, (the "Company") filed with the City of Allen ("City"), a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104.301 for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system; and, WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(6) and 103.001; and, WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Armes' proposed rate increase; and, WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Allen to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ("Commission"), said coalition being known as Armes Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC"), in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and, WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and, WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and, WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed ' by the Company; and, WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law; and, WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates ' that the Company actually decreased per -customer investment in infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and, WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and, WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and, WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corporation's current capital structure, which justifies a lower rate of return; and, WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further over -earning by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and, WHEREAS, in consideration of the city taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALLEN, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS, THAT: ' SECTION 1. The Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its per -customer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the Company's GRIP request would result in overearning by the Company in the year of implementation; and (f) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. SECTION 2. The City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. SECTION 3. The Company, upon submission from ACSC, shall promptly reimburse the reasonable costs associated with the ACSC's activities related to the proposed GRIP Rate Increases SECTION 4. The City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the City's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTION 5. It is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is ' passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. Ordinance No. 2421-7-05, Page 2 SECTION 6. A copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard ' Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Armes Energy Corporation, Mid-Tex Division, Lincoln Center B, 18' Floor, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall take effect immediately from and atter its passage and publication of the caption in accordance with the provisions of the charter of the City of Allen, and it is accordingly so ordained. DULY PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCH. OF THE CITY OF ALLEN, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS, ON THIS THE 12"' DAY OF JULY, 2005. JAPPPPPR-.-(O�yVVEEJ�D: Steph'" hi Terrell, MAYOR APPROVED A/S�TO FORM: ATTEST: t� Peter G. Smith, CWY ATTORNEY Shelley B. Georg C, CITY SUCRETARY Ordinance No. 2421-7-05, Page 3 ATMOS (. energy July 27, 2005 Atmos Energy Corporation 5420 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1823 Dallas, Texas 75240 Richard Reis Tel: 214.206.2860 Director Fax: 214.206.2131 Rates Richard.Reis@AtmosEnergy.com Re: Petition for Review of Municipal Rate Decisions filed with the Railroad Commission of Texas on July 28, 2005 To the Honorable City or Town Council: Attached hereto is a copy of the Armes Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division's (the "Company") Petition for Review of Municipal Rate Decisions ("Petition"), which was filed at the Railroad Commission of Texas on July 27, 2005. The Petition appeals the decision of your municipality regarding the Company's 2003 Annual Gas Reliability Program Rate Adjustment which was filed in accordance with the provisions of Section • 104.301 of the Texas Utilities Code. Section 104.301 provides for an annual adjustment to rates to reflect additional investment made in the gas utility's system for utility service. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Yours truly, 1114L Richard Reis E Atmos Energy Corporation 5420 LBJ Fr ,, Suite 1800, Dallas, S 75240 • GAS UTILITIES DOCKET NO. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF § MUNICIPAL ACTIONS REGARDING § BEFORE THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX § RAILROAD COMMISSION DIVISION'S ANNUAL GAS § OF TEXAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM RATE § ADJUSTMENT § PETITION FOR REVIEW OF MUNICIPAL RATE DECISIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. JURISDICTION................................................................................................................. 1 II. ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM RATE ADJUSTMENT ............................. 2 III. DETAILS OF PROPOSED CHANGES 3 IV. COMMISSION JURISDICTION.......................................................................................4 • V. RATE CASE EXPENSES..................................................................................................4 VI. DISCOVERY........................................................................................:.............................5 VH. NOTICE..............................................................................................................................5 VIII. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE...............................................................................5 RECEIVED R.R.C. OF TEXAS JUL 2 7 2005 W SERVICES DIVISION AUSTIN, TEXAS 0 . GAS UTILITIES DOCKET NO. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF § MUNICIPAL ACTIONS REGARDING § BEFORE THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX § RAILROAD COMMISSION DIVISION'S ANNUAL GAS § OF TEXAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM RATE § Gita IIL`YY�51 sI�Y PETITION FOR REVIEW OF MUNICIPAL RATE DECISIONS TO THE HONORABLE RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS: COMES NOW ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION (hereinafter "Petitioner" or the "Company') and files this Petition for Review (the "Petition") of the action of certain cities and towns in the Company's natural gas utility system (collectively, the "Cities" or, individually, the "City'), denying Petitioner's tariff to implement its Annual Gas Reliability Program Rate Adjustment filed in those Cities. This Petition is filed pursuant to Sections • 103.051 and 103.054 of the Texas Utilities Code (the "Utilities Code"). In support of this • Petition, the Company respectfully shows as follows: I. The Company is a natural gas utility as defined by Sections 101.003(7) and 121.001 of the Utilities Code. The Commission has exclusive appellate jurisdiction over any municipal decision regarding the rates, operations, or services of a gas utility pursuant to Utilities Code § 102.001(6). Pursuant to Utilities Code § 103.055, the Commission's appellate review authority is de novo. The Company is requesting that the Commission exercise its appellate jurisdiction with respect to this Petition. PETMON FOR REv1Ew-PAGE 1 OF 7 0 II. ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM RATE ADJUSTMENT Pursuant to the provisions of Section 104.301 of the Utilities Code, during the week beginning on December 13, 2004, Petitioner filed with each municipality in which the Company provides natural gas service, a proposed tariff to implement the Company's Annual Gas Reliability Program ("GRIP") Rate Adjustment. hi addition, the company filed with the Commission its GRIP rate adjustment tariff for the environs customers on its system. The Company proposed an implementation date of February 15, 2005 for the tariffs. The Company filed the proposed tariff with each incorporated municipality pursuant to the municipality's exclusive original jurisdiction over the Company's distribution rates as set forth in Section 103.001 of the Utilities Code. Certain cities denied the Company's originally proposed tariff in all respects. Atmos appealed those cities' denials to the Commission in GUD Nos. 9567, 9568, • 9569, and 9575, pursuant to Utilities Code Sections 103.051 and 103.055. In an Order dated March 22, 2005 the Commission approved, with certain changes,[ the tariff implementing the Company's GRIP adjustment for its environs and pipeline customers in GUD No. 9560. Further, the Commission approved the relief requested in the aforementioned appeals, subject to the same modifications. In order to reflect the changes the Commission made to the GRIP implementation tariff in GUD No. 9560, starting on April 25, 2005 Atmos filed revised tariffs with the Cities that had suspended indefinitely the originally proposed GRIP adjustment tariff. Attached to this Petition as Attachment 1 is a copy of the filing made after December 13, 2004 with each municipality. The Order required the Company to allocate the revenue to be collected through the interim rate adjustment among the Company's customer classes in the same roamer that the cost of service was allocated among customer classes in the Company's most recent rate case. Order at 4, FOF 34. The Order also required the Company to calculate its flat rate applied in the monthly customer charge by dividing the total revenue per customer class by the number of customer charges per year per customer class. Order at 4, FOP 36. PETITION FOR REVIEW -PAGE 2 OF 7 ® Since the Company filed the revised tariff with the municipalities, certain Cities have denied the Company's request in all respects. The cities from whose actions the Company now appeals are those cities that have previously suspended consideration or implementation of the tariff, but have now acted and denied the rate adjustment in its entirety. The Company files this Petition to have the Commission review the actions of those Cities. Attached to this Petition as Attachment 2 is a list of the Cities that denied the Company's request and the dates of the municipal actions. Attached to this Petition as Attachment 3 is a copy of the Cities' ordinances and/or resolutions denying the Company's request. III. DETAILS OF PROPOSED CHANGES A. Annual Gas Reliability Program Rate Adjustment Beginning April 25, 2005 the Company filed its revised GRIP adjustment tariff with each • of the Cities. Through the Annual Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program Rate Adjustment filed with the municipalities, the Company sought an interim rate adjustment based on the difference between the value of the invested capital for the distribution portion of the Former TXU Gas System as of December 31, 2003 and the value of the invested capital as of December 31, 2002, as approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400. B. Compliance with Rule 7.205 As required by Commission Rule 7.205 (16 TEx. ADMIN CODE § 7.205 (2004)) the Company provides the following information: 1. The proposed tariff and tariff calculations are included as Exhibit W to Attachment 1 2. The proposed Annual Gas Reliability infrastructure Program Rate Adjustment, . with respect to 2003 infrastructure, would result in the following increases to the P=ON FOR REv1Ew-PAGE 3 OF 7 . applicable customer charge or meter charge: Rate R - $0.29 increase to monthly Customer Charge, for a total proposed monthly Customer Charge of $9.29 Rate C - $0.96 increase to monthly Customer Charge, for a total proposed monthly Customer Charge of $16.46 and Rate I and T - $31.85 increase to monthly Meter Charge, for a total proposed monthly Meter Charge of $181.85 3. The proposed change will increase the revenues of the Company by $6,691,224 per year. 4. The proposed change will affect all customers on the Company's system who receive service under Rate R, Rate C, Rate T, or Rate 1. As of December 31, 2004, the Company served 1,343,101 residential customers, 123,032 commercial customers, and 1,527 industrial customers. is 5. The relevant affidavits, reports, and other evidence supporting the Company's proposed Annual Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program Rate Adjustment are included in Attachment 1 to this Petition. IV. COMMISSION JURISDICTION The Company files this Petition with the Commission within the 30 -day period set forth in Section 103.054(b) of the Utilities Code for a de novo appeal of the actions of the Cities: The Commission has jurisdiction over this Petition and authority to approve the Company's proposed Annual Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program Rate Adjustment in the Cities pursuant to Section 102.001(b) of the Utilities Code. V. RATE CASE EXPENSES Pursuant to Commission Rule 7.5530 (16 Tax ADmiN. CODE § 7.5530 (2004)), Petitioner • requests recovery of its reasonable rate case expenses. Petitioner proposes that, after the PUMON FOR REv1Ew-PAGE 4 OF 7 • conclusion of the hearing on the merits in this matter, a short proceeding be convened to take testimony and present evidence from all interested parties on the issue of rate case expenses. VI. DISCOVERY In an effort to reduce rate case expenses and to expedite this proceeding, the Company requests that a limit be placed on discovery in this proceeding. The Company requests that an expedited hearing on discovery matters be conducted to establish all appropriate limitations and timeframes. The Company anticipates that it will file additional appeals as additional municipalities make decisions oa the Company's municipal filings. As additional appeals are taken from municipal actions, all intervening cities, or their representatives, will have the opportunity to review all discovery materials that have previously been supplied by the Company. • VII. NOTICE Simultaneous with the filing of this Petition, Petitioner will deliver, via certified U.S. First Class Mail, a copy of this Petition to the Cities. are: VIII. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The Company's business address and telephone number for the purposes of this filing Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division 5420 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1823 Dallas, Dallas County, Texas 75240 214.206.2860 The Company's authorized representatives are: Richard Reis Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division 5420 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1823 • Dallas, Dallas County, Texas 75240 PETITION Fort REv1Ew-PAGE 5 OF 7 Telephone: 214.206.2860 Fax: 214.206.2131 E-mail: richard.reis@atmosenergy.com ETl Gary D. Compton John K Arnold Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP Suite 300 100 Congress Avenue Austin, Texas 78701 Telephone: 512.305.4877 Fax: 512.391.4877 E-mail: jamold@lockeliddell.com General inquiries concerning this Petition should be directed to Mr. Reis at the above - stated address and telephone number. All pleadings, motions, orders, and other documents filed in this proceeding should be served on Mr. Reis and Mr. Arnold at the above stated addresses. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division • prays that: (1) the Commission set this matter for Hearing; (2) the Commission limit discovery in • this case and issue an expedited discovery schedule; (3) upon Final Hearing, the Commission issue an Order authorizing and permitting Petitioner to place into effect its proposed Annual Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program Rate Adjustment for each of the Cities; (4) the Commission, after a hearing on the merits, will allow the Company and appropriate Intervenors the opportunity to hold a short hearing on the issue of rate case expenses; and (5) the Commission grant to Petitioner such further legal, equitable, and necessary relief to which Petitioner may be entitled. PmrioN FOR REVIEW -PAGE 6 OF 7 • Respectfully s miffed , n By: rl'J'l Ql��Q John Iq Arnold State ar No.24013829 Locxe LIDDELL & SAPP LLP 100 Congress, Suite 300 Austin, Texas 78701-4042 Telephone: 512.305.4877 Facsimile: 512.305.4891 ATTORNEYS FOR ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DMSION CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document has been served via certified U.S. First Class Mail on August 5, 2005, upon a representative of each City. • • PETITION FOR REVIEW -PAGE 7 OF 7 EATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM TARIFF FILING TABLE OF CONTENTS Pleading Tariff and Tariff Calculation Exhibit A - Tariff for Gas Service Tariff Calculation Affidavits Railroad Commission of Texas Interim Cost Recovery and Rate Adjustment Report Earnings Monitoring Report (EMR) -Schedule GRIP -1 Schedule GRIP -1 Railroad Commission of Texas Annual Earnings Monitoring Report Project Report - Schedule GRIP -2 Schedule GRIP -2 0 0 C, J ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX § BEFORE THE RESPECTIVE DIVISION ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY § GOVERNING BODY OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM RATE § ATMOS ENERGY CORP., ADJUSTMENT FOR THE COMPANY'S § MID-TEX DIVISION CITIES AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM § TOWNS ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM RATE ADJUSTMENT FOR THE COMPANY'S TO THE HONORABLE CITY OR TOWN COUNCIL: NOW COMES Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division (the "Company") and, in accordance with Section 104.301 of the Texas Utilities Code, files this Annual Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program Rate Adjustment for the Company's Distribution System, and would show as follows: I. The Company's business address and telephone number are: Atmos Energy Corp., Ivfid- Tex Division, 300 S. St. Paul Street, 8th Floor, Dallas, Texas, 75201, 214.875.6975. H. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES The Company's authorized representatives for service of all pleadings and other documents are: Richard Reis and Douglas C. Walther Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division Atmos Energy Corporation 300 S. St. Paul Street, 8th Floor 5430 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1800 Dallas, Texas 75201 Dallas, Texas 75240-2601 Telephone: 214.875.6975 Telephone: 972.855.3102 Fax: 214.875.3936 Fax: 972.855.3080 E-mail: richard.reis@atmosenergy.cem E-mail: douglas.walther @atmosenergy.com General inquiries concerning the filing should be directed to Mr. Reis at the above - • referenced address and phone number. All pleadings, motions, and other documents filed in this proceeding should be served on both Mr. Reis and Mr. Walther at the above -referenced addresses. • M The Company is making this filing in accordance with the provisions of Section 104.301 of the Texas Utilities Code ("Section 104.301'). Pursuant to Section 104.301, a gas utility that has filed a rate case within the preceding two years may file a tariff or rate schedule that provides for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program interim rate adjustment in the utility's monthly customer charge or initial block rate to recover the cost of changes in the investment in service for gas utility services. On October 1, 2004, Atmos Energy Corporation merged with TXU Gas Company and began operating the natural gas system that was formerly operated by TXU Gas Company (the "Former TXU Gas System'). The distribution portion of the Former TXU Gas System is operated by Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division. This filing applies only to the distribution portion of the Former TXU Gas System that is located inside the corporate boundaries of your city or town and is not applicable to any of the Company's other gas utility facilities. On or about May 23, 2003, TXU Gas Company filed a rate case with your city related to • the Former TXU Gas System located inside the corporate limits of your city, utilizing a December 31, 2002 test year. In that proceeding, it was requested that your city deny the rate request or defer jurisdiction to the Railroad Commission of Texas (the "Commission') so that the Commission could establish system -wide rates for all customers. Such system -wide rates were established by the Commission on May 25, 2004 in the Commission's Final Order in Gas Utilities Docket No. 9400. In this filing, the Company seeks an interim rate adjustment based on the difference between the value of the invested capital for the distribution portion of the Former TXU Gas System as of December 31, 2003 and the value of the invested capital as of December 31, 2002, as approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400. IV. CONTENTS OF FILING The filing includes three primary components. Included in the Section marked "Tariff and Tariff Calculation" are: • (a) the proposed tariff that implements the requested interim rate adjustment labeled as "Exhibit A". The proposed implementation date of the tariff is February 15,2005; • (b) the Company's calculations of the Gas Reliability Infrastructure Tariff Amount. The Tariff Calculation section of the filing also includes schedules showing the computations of the tariff calculation by class of customer; (c) the affidavits of Charles R. Yarbrough attesting to the method and date on which notice will be given, and that of Barbara W. Myers, which verifies that schedules attached to this pleading are true and correct summaries of the Company's books and records related to the invested capital for the Former TXU Gas System; (d) The Texas Railroad Commission's ("Commission's") Interim Cost Recovery and Rate Adjustment Report. Additionally, this filing includes the following schedules: In the section labeled "EMR Schedule GRIP -1" are the Company's calculations in compliance with Section 104.301(1) of the Texas Utilities Code, that demonstrates the Company's earnings during 2003 related to the Former TXU Gas System, and the Commission's Annual Earnings Monitoring Report. • A Project Report, labeled as Schedule GRIP -2, which, in accordance with Section 104.301(e) of the Texas Utilities Code, describes the investment projects completed and placed in service during 2003 and the investments retired or abandoned during 2003. Schedule GRIP -2 also states the cost, need, and customers benefited by the change in investment. V. NOTICE The Company will provide notice of this proceeding to affected customers by bill insert or direct mail within 45 days after filing in accordance with Section 104.301. (Remainder of Page intentionally blank) 0 0 Vi. PRAYER FOR REUEF WHEREFORE, PRENHSES CONSIDERED, the Company respectfully requests that your city either deny the annual gas reliability infrastructure program interim rate adjustment tariff attached hereto as Exhibit "A" or allow the annual gas reliability infrastructure program interim rate adjustment tariff to go into effect by operation of law, and award the Company such other and farther relief to which the Company may show itself to be justly entitled. RespectCiilly submitted, AtmosEnergyCorp., Mid -Tea Division By. gl Douglas C. Walther, Senior Counsel Charles R. Yarbrough, 11 State Bar No. 22130700 Vice President, Rates and Regulatory • Affairs • 0 Certificate of Service The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of this pleading was served on the persons listed below by hand delivery, overnight delivery, or first class mail on this 17th day of December, 2004. C, Mr. Stephen L. Pituer Railroad Commission of Texas 1701 Congress Ave., Ste, 1200 Austin, Texas 78701 512.463.7938 512.463.6684 (Fax) Mr. Lindil Fowler Railroad Commission of Texas 1701 N. Congress Ave., Ste. 1200 Austin, Texas 78701 • 512.463.1985 512.463.6684 (Fax) Mr. Ed Abrahamson Railroad Commission of Texas 1701 N. Congress Ave., Ste. 1200 Austin, Texas 78701 512.463.7022 512.463.6684 (Fax) lvlr. Geoffrey Gay Lloyd, Gosselink, Blevins, Rochelle, Baldwin & Townsend, P.C. I I I Congress Ave., Ste. 1800 Austin, Texas 78767 512.322.5800 512.472.0532 (Fax) W. Jim Boyle Law Offices of Jim Boyle PLLC 1005 Congress, Suite 550 Austin, Texas 78701 512.474.2507 (Fax) 11 Douglas C. Walther, Senior Counsel N 0 EXHIBIT "A" TARIFF FOR GAR SERVICE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION RIDER: IRA -D Infrastructure Rate Adjustment - Distribution APPLICABLE TO: Distribution System of Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division REVISION: 0 DATE: EFFECTIVE DATE: IRA component PAGE: 1 OF t RIDER IRA -D - INFRASTRUCTURE RATE ADJUSTMENT - DISTRIBUTION Applicability Company may implement an adjustment (called'Infrastructure Rate Adjustment- Distribution' or'IRA-D°) to the Customer Charge or Meter Charge contained in Rate R, Rate C, Rate I and Rate T. The Rider IRA -D adjustment will become effective 60 days after the Company files (i) an annual report for Distribution pursuant to Texas Utilities Code (TUC) Section 104.301(e), describing the investment projects completed and placed in service during the preceding calendar year and the investments retired or abandoned during the preceding calendar year, and (ii) an earnings monitoring report pursuant to TUC Section 104.301(f), demonstrating Company's Distribution System earnings during the preceding calendar year. Method of Calculation The IRA -D is determined by applying the appropriate factors for depreciation expense, property taxes, return, and federal income taxes from the Company's last approved rate case for the Distribution System to the change in either Utility Plant Investment or Net Utility Plant Investment, as shown in the table below, from the end of the previous calendar year per book amounts to either (a) the last effective rate case Utility Plant or Net Utility Plant Investment amounts if the test year utilized in such rate case was the second previous calendar year or (b) the end of the second previous calendar year per book Utility Plant or Net Utility Plant Investment amounts. Such amount shall then be allocated to each customer class by multiplying the total IRA -D amount by each class' Capacity Allocation Factor as established in the last approved late case. The individual rate class adjustments for Rate R and Rate C shall be calculated by dividing the result of the above calculation applicable to Rate R or Rate C by the total number of customers in the Rate R or Rate C class, as applicable, during the previous year. The individual rate class adjustments for Rate I and Rate T shall be calculated by dividing the result of the above calculation applicable to Rate I and Rate T by the total number of annual meters served under Rate T and Rate I. Applied to Change in Net Utility Plant Investment Applied to Change in Utility Plant Investment IRA component Factor IRA component Factor Return 8.258% Depreciation 3.539% Property Tax 1.550% Federal Income Taxes 2.738% Notice Service hereunder is subject to the orders of regulatory bodies having jurisdiction and to Companys Tariff for Gas Service. 7J • 0 H LL ry Q 11 m m ro m E_ y E d O m 2 �t U U y my.. O m � 6 O i w » w t7 V H � v a� C N O MZ w r 9 H H O O a n w Oww LL LM m o n o W x O W U < W H m w r m m NO3N go f E E d a a za o 0 U U J Mo 8 L U a � w u a d w t U E 0 a 1- R C 9 R N N N C O m m m 20 m C m O: m K 0 Z.- • c m J Z � n n v m m r Schedule A ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TE)(DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM TARIFF FILING AS OF DECEMBER 31,2003 Tonal Approved Per Book Charge In Line Per OLD 9400 Per Book Adjusted InvsatmMd No. Description At 12/31102 As of 12131103 Adjustments As of 12*1103 Ref (Col.s-Col.b) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) 10 (9) 1 Utility Plant investment $ 1,555,483,296 $ 1,718,007,295 $ (88728,038) $ 1,629.278.257 1 $ 73795,981 2 Accumulated Depredator 571,128,098 623,051,757 :846,085) 612,405,692 1 41.277,696 3 Net U61ity Plant investment $ 884,355,200 $ 1,094,955,538 $ (78,OB1,973) $ 1,016,873,565 $ 32.518,385 4 5 6 Caloulatim of Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program Tariff Filing Amount 7 Return (Sch.A,Ln,3.Col.9)times(SO.B.Ln.1,Col.b) $ 2,685,367 8 Deprecia0on Expense (Bch.A,Ln.1,Col,g)tlmes(SO.B.Ln 6.Col.b) 2,811,375 9 Property-related Taxes(Ad!Valorem) (SO.A.Ln.3,Cd.g)Imes(SO.B,Ln.11,Cd,b) 504.158 10 Revenue-related Taxes 2 - 11 Federal Income Tax (Sch.C,Ln.9,Col.b) 890.324 12 Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program Tariff Filing Amount $ 6.691,224 13 14 Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program Tara Filing Amount limes the Capacity AlbnBm Factors: 16 Rete Schedule R (Sch.A,Ln.12,Cd.g)dome(SN.B.Ln.16,W.b) $ 5.021.777 16 Rete ScIi C (Sch.A,Ln.12 Col.g)Ocoee(Bch.B,Ln.17.Cd.b) 1,247,304 17 Rete Schedules I and T (Sch.A.VI.12,Col.g)Imes(Sch.B.Ln.18,Cd.b) 422,143 18 Total $ 6,891,224 19 20 Total Change In CustomedMeter Charge: 21 Rate Bdledule R (Sch.A.Ln.15,Cd.g)divided by(Bch.B.Ln.22,CoL b)$ 0.31 22 Rata Schedule C (Bch.A,Ln.16,Cd.9)dMded by(Bch.B.Ln.23,Cd.b)$ 0.84 23 Rale Schedubs I and T (SM.A,Ln.17,Cd.g)divided by(SO.B,U.24,Col.b)$ 26.85 24 25 Nolen 26 1. See Workpaper/Schedule A for adjustment details. 27 2. Revenue-related taxes are recovered Ihreugh Rlders TAX and FF. [] i c 0 ! r;. ) ))\ k\� \ } }// 2£| ¥ \/\\ )|!. 0rD ! 0400 woo ;,'5La #!■ K■(- G■§! `§[§ §§16 ! % § y | ! � } °!•, ! ' _ ) ! . § -!. !!! §))! kk f & y. § } }!kk ) pf! ;} )!!! !! ! !2911 -- _�_! [] c - r 0 0 ; . K } \ §/J 7 ! { , $ \ ! 2 ( - "M ) ) _ zwmw !!§tee ) § 7) BSB| §\\�\ \ ) 6 - - §� f})\` 0 ) ) - a!!{) #! 2 § & ��k ° /} ( k E \78 8 ! ! E}�!/! -r r )k-�«E 2�■ %! ! J!|!� , ,»,k§#■ - 5 \7 00 5 } 3.=.�, !�!}|{;; L 0 0 /1 0 H LL ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX § BEFORE THE RESPECTIVE DIVISION ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY § GOVERNING BODY OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM RATE § ATMOS ENERGY CORP., ADJUSTMENT FOR THE COMPANY'S § MID-TEX DIVISION CITIES DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM § AND TOWNS AFFIDAVIT OF CHARLES R. YARBROUGH. II Before me, the undersigned authority, on this date personally appeared Charles R. Yarbrough, II, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed below, and being by me first duly sworn, stated upon oath as follows: 1. "My name is Charles R. Yarbrough, II. I am Vice President of Rates and Regulatory Affairs for Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division and Atmos Pipeline - Texas, a Division of Atmos Energy Corporation, a position I assumed on October 1, 2004, when Atmos Energy Corporation merged with TXU Gas Company. Prior to October 1, 2004, I was Manager, Regulatory Affairs for TXU Gas Company, a position I held since 2002. Prior to that time I was Manager, Regulatory Affairs for TXU Lone Star Pipeline. I have over 25 years' experience in the natural gas utility industry. I am fully competent to make this affidavit, and each statement of fact herein is true of my own personal knowledge." 2. Notice of the filing in this proceeding will be accomplished by bill insert for residential and commercial customers beginning on December 17, 2004 and ending on January • 18, 2005. Notice to industrial and other non-residential and non-commercial customers will be accomplished by direct mail on or before January 18, 2005. Charles R. Yarough, II SWORN AND SUBSCRIBED before me this the 0aday of December, 2004. ` Notary Public, StateofT� • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX § BEFORE THE RESPECTIVE DIVISION ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY § GOVERNING BODY OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM RATE § ATMOS ENERGY CORP., ADJUSTMENT FOR THE COMPANY'S § MH)-TEX DIVISION CITIES DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM § AND TOWNS AFFIDAVIT OF BARBARA W. MYERS Before me, the undersigned authority, on this date personally appeared Barbara W. Myers, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed below, and being by me first duly sworn, stated upon oath as follows: 1. "My name is Barbara W. Myers. I am Regulatory Accounting Manager for Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division and Atmos Pipeline - Texas, a Division of Atmos Energy Corporation, a position I assumed on October 1, 2004, when Atmos Energy Corporation merged with TXU Gas Company. Prior to October 1, 2004, I was Regulatory Accounting Manager for TXU Gas Company, a position I held since 2000. Prior to that time I was Gas Accounting Manager of TXU Gas Company. I have been a certified public accountant in the state of Texas since 1992. I have over IS years' experience in accounting related to natural gas utilities. I am fully competent to make this affidavit, and each statement of fact herein is true of my own personal knowledge." 2. "TXU Gas Company (now Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division and Atmos Pipeline - Texas, a division of Atmos Energy Corporation), keeps its books and records in accordance with the Rules of the Railroad Commission of Texas. Specifically, in accordance with the Railroad Commission Rules applicable at that time, before, after, and during the period from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2003, TXU Gas utilized the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) Uniform System of Accounts for Class A and B Utilities for all operating and reporting purposes, unless authorized to depart from such system of accounts by the applicable regulatory authorities. Pursuant to a change in the Railroad Commission's rules that was effective in early 2004, TXU Gas adopted the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (FERC) Uniform System of Accounts (USOA) prescribed for Natural Gas Companies subject to the Provisions of the Natural Gas Act (as amended from time to time) (FERC USOA) for all operating and reporting purposes, unless authorized to depart from such system of accounts by the applicable regulatory authorities." 3. "I have reviewed the GRIP -1 and GRIP -2 schedules filed in this docket. These schedules we summaries of TXU Gas' books and records for the period between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2003." 61 r Barbara W. Myers v SWORN AND SUBSCRIBED before me this the—day of November, 2004. Dana R. Moore Notary Public, State of Te xo.s aOa, "11c. sole al Texas rEy! Myeamm. wcesmns 0 INTERIM COST RECOVERY AND RATE ADJUSTMENT OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., • MID-TEX DIVISION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS FOR THE Twelve Month Period Ending December 31, 2003 Check one: This is an original submission [ X ] This is a revised submission [ ] • Date of submission : December 17, 2004 6 GENERAL QUESTIONS If additional space is required, please attach pages providing the requested information. 1. State the exact name of the utility. Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division 2. State the date when the utility was originally organized. December 11, 1942 3. Report any change in name during the most recent year and state the effective date. Name changed from TXU Gas Company to Atmos Energy Corp., Lone Star Division effective October 1, 2004; Name change from Atmos Energy Corp., Lone Star Division to Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division is pending in P-5 Department of the Commission. 4. State the name, title, phone number, email address, and office address of the officer of the utility to whom correspondence should be addressed concerning this report. Charles R. Yarborough, II, Vice President, Rates and Regulatory Affairs, 214.875.3613, Charles.yarbrough@atmosenergy.com, 300 S. St. Paul Street Dallas, Texas 75201 5. State the name, title, phone number, email address, and office address of any other individual designated the utility to answer questions regarding this report (optional). Douglas Walther, Senior Counsel, 972.855.3102, douglas.walther@atmosenergy.com, 5430 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1800, Dallas Texas 75240-2601 6. State the location of the office where the Company's accounts and records are kept. 300 S. St. Paul Street, Dallas, Texas 75201 7. IF THIS IS A REVISED REPORT, provide the schedule number, line number, and column designation where each change input data appears. 4 c c [] \\\\\\\\ k \\\\\\\\ { C ! f| \\`#&f»[\ * \ ( ( \ ! \ om EM E22 Q Fa § \ \ ) ) \ / §! cc 0 \ \U t �� k { C ! * \ ( ( \ ! \ om EM E22 Q Fa § \ \ ) IL I • x 3 I a a 2.0 0 o oZo o 0 o zzz z z `n L U w m a a m a °9A n ol w a¢ m zzz Sim � N Q O R N m -2.2 y m Z Z Z Z w o Z E a w � N rrm m r N O N m w a=5 n O�aa w N 0 o m ¢ � m N¢a` n w www w w n m �rvp N m a LL LL Q » www w w a m m m O m x t7 CI O r h �ppl `y A Y1 r fO O m < P w w w N w w Q L W ~ W pa H a Q J i U a Z `m F h U x Y A A J K ¢ C N f Q OF O Z K Z I • FEDERAL INCOME TAX ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION TWELVE MONTH PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2003 4w P CHANGE IN FEDERAL INCOME TAX r$--8-90,3-2-41 IRA -7 YEAR 1 YEAR 2 Description Amount Amount Return on Investment Invested Capital (Rate Base) $ 769,721,018 $ 802,239,383 Rate of Return 8.258% 8.258% Return on Investment $ 63,563,562 $ 66,248,928 Interest Expense Invested Capital (Rate Base) $ 769,721,018 $ 802,239,383 Weighted Cost of Debt 3.173% 3.173% Interest Expense $ 24,425,634 $ 25,457,543 After Tax Income $ 39,137,928 $ 40,791,386 Gross -up Factor 1.538461538 1.538461538 Before Tax Return $ 60,212,196 $ 62,755,978 Federal Income Tax Rate 35% 35% Federal Income Tax $ 21,074,269 1 $ 21,964,592 CHANGE IN FEDERAL INCOME TAX r$--8-90,3-2-41 IRA -7 [] k k�` \ ! - §k�la � °- ; !!, ,�, ! r#!&■■! ; K : ■ §#\ 2q# # ■#»!#!§ �■ # - - �; -■; , �- � , � � \k\ !■! !!||) ,®f! Uku /hi i - i §\ |\wo 22 :,'§|\! )t!/ !!!!!!!! ��- \ I;EE\\7§§■ .��N|§)2 + / !�� ®]$B) ■■■■)k$ / 0 9 [] §}} / SrmE\■7N$ ■NlN7k) & - ° +v##e�K ■ ! ■�•B§■! - -e _ �, ®�� ; ■ - .. / SrmE\■7N$ ■NlN7k) & \ §e ; f \ ( �E` r| _ j\ �) ` ;\ ) !�K $r■ $ \l�fm52 § M.M. E\ W \� {z§ !na \)!§ , | :i 2!§!! \ }\®!( 0 E :,|£!ti!| t} _ \§) !`!!!!` -_ !■ !! _ CL §) �;, _ A 2,S - � .!:!.!!! \)!!!°!#!! )!| - !O!w §/�« § !r«E§\f\)\ §!■■|w§! \\ \ 0 L 0 ! ! H ) _\- !.!\ �,- � )�(k{§{|) |!v v ■|�|s ■! |$| H m�,�® •�! | !!lEi,§«\ §■lBI,§ � ) _\- !.!\ �,- � )�(k{§{|) |!v v m�,�® •�! | !!lEi,§«\ §■lBI,§ � 0 [� 0 \- -) - �).!�} k§)\q !■■B)§)§ .lam \- -) - �).!�} k§)\q !■■B)§)§ 4 :.� ®°�°� ■!:N)■$ ■ �,. { 11 • • J no: O W Q y W � Y X - wwZ W EWFO w O - LL 22 Q • Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division Infrastructure Detail (Cross-reference) Twelve Month Period Ending December 31, 2003 Purpose: The purpose of this schedule is to provide an informative cross reference between the proposed Infrastructure Detail - Additions schedule and the information provided in the Company's "Project Report" included in this filing. The Company's Project Report is being provided in lieu of the "Infrastructure Detail — Additions" schedule. Asset or ID Number: Asset or ID Number is found in the 15t column of each page in the accompanying Project Report. The column is labeled "Project Number". Each project in the Company's systems has a specific project number, unless the project is a type commonly called a "blanket" project, which indicates costs are being incurred of a general nature that are not readily accounted for as relating to a specific project. Project Reason: Project Reason is provided in the 6s' column of each page in the accompanying Project Report. The column is labeled "Purpose of Project". Each project has a specific purpose listed. Project Description: Project Description is provided in the 3'a column of each page in the accompanying Project Report. The column is labeled "Description of Completed Projects Placed in Gas Utility Plant in Service or Retired during 2003". The description provided for each project provided details of what each project was related to, and whether or not it was an addition or retirement. Project Start Date: Project Start Date is not provided. Project Start Dates are not tracked in the Company's system, thus this piece of information is not available. Project Completion Date: Project Completion Date is provided for Additions in the 7`" column of each page in the accompanying Project Report. The column is labeled "Date Placed in Gas Utility Plant in Service". Customers Benefited — Geographical: It is unclear as to the specific purpose of this piece of information, however the Company has provided information in the 5" column labeled "Location" that provides the city or jurisdiction in which the project was physically located. Customers Benefited — NumberlClass: Customers Benefited is provided in the 4v' column of each page in the accompanying Project Report. The column is labeled "Customers Benefited". Total Project Cost Information: The total cost for each project is provided in the 2ntl column of the accompanying Project Report in the column labeled "Cost". WEIGHTED AVERAGE COST OF CAPITAL ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2003 PER MOST RECENT RATE CASE - GUD DOCKET NO. 9400 Per Last Rate Case Docket No. 9400 Investment Percent of Weighted Balance Total Cost Cost 1 Common Equity $ 428,042,237 49.8% 10.00% 4.980% 2 Preferred Stock 16,330,929 1.9% 5.51% 0.105% 3 Preferred Trust Securities 4 Long -Term Debt 415,149,398 48.3% 6.57% 3.173% 5 Short -Term Debt 6 7 Total $ 859,522,564 100.0% 8.258% • Rate of Return 8.258% allowed in Docket No. 9400 C J 0 40 0 ALLOCATION OF INVESTMENT RECOVERY ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION R: 0.750502 GUD 9400 Final Order, Schedule F (D), Line 2, Page 2 C: 0.186409 GUD 9400 Final Order, Schedule F (D), Line 2, Page 2 1 and Rate T: 0.063089 GUD 9400 Final Order, Schedule F (D), Line 2, Page 2 1.000000 R: 0.750502 Tariff Calc., Schedule B, Ln. 16, Col b C: 0.186409 Tariff Cala, Schedule B, La 17, Col b I and Rate T: 0.063089 Tariff Calc., Schedule B, Ln. 18, Col b 1.000000 Recovery Amount R: 0.750502 C: 0.186409 1 and Rate T: 0.063089 6,691,224 Tariff Calc., Sch A, Ln. 12, Col g 5,021,777 Tariff Calc., Sch A, Ln. 15, Col g 1,247,304 Tariff Calc., Sch A, Ln. 16, Col g 422,143 Tariff Calc., Sch A, Ln. 17, Col g • SIGNATURE PAGE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID•TEX DIVISION RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS - INTERIM COST RECOVERY AND RATE ADJUSTMENT REPORT I certify that I am the responsible official of Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division; that I have examined the foregoing report; that to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, all statements of fact contained in the said report are true and the said report is a correct statement of the business and affairs of the above-named respondent in respect to each and every matter set forth therein during the period from December 31, 2002 to December 31, 2003 inclusive. I understand until the issuance of a final order or decision by a regulatory authority in a rate case that is filed after the implementation of a tariff or rate schedule under this section, all amounts collected under the tariff or rate schedule before the filing of the rate case are subject to refund. December 17, 2004 Date ff5are Vice President, Rates and Regulatory Affairs Title Address: 300 S. St. Paul Street, 8th Floor Dallas, Texas 75201 Phone: 214.875.3813 Email address: chades.yarbrough@atmosenergy.com Alternative contact regarding this report: Name: Douglas C. Walther Title: Senior Counsel Address: 5430 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1800 Dallas, Texas 75240-2801 Phone: 972.855.3102 Email address: douglas.walther@atmosenergy.com 0 0 0 ` - ® &k#$(& m ■ \ k#■%«■ ! $NR # ! � 4 l -a•`# ° ) ® .6 Le f ( '�■k#! # # # #!k � 7m§ E { )�!! ƒ !!®» .;l; ; ,!7! 7 L ! .I . I . I I I . I . k $�\)■ �> \ k#■%«■ # � 4 l -a•`# ° ) '�■k#! # # # #!k � E { )�!! ƒ !!®» .;l; ; ,!7! e .22 2 |{ � � )k)k ! §ƒ�) E \ §\ !\k)\} )!/ \ }� . ��kk!/\ /) !}2) !6 -- !!!a!! E;«,• f ` `}|§!! E;!■ 2 |!2) | ))§'i( ! !4!!�!� ! ! . rI L 0 - N CI V 0 0 M m m� :: V V :! !R m �: m W N <NID 1�m m m m m m 0 C C C C C C E E EEE E e r m > > J 7 J O J U UUUUU < Q Q Q Q Q c c m EO E 3 33333 o � U N m N m N N N J N J N p n h Q' n o r pm N tND vm O 0 Ol N i[l 1� l0 OI O t7 r 0 t79 mp Oi DmiNN N p U y tD O) O m O 1m N n_ Opi m � N 0 N N m N m N m s S a .11 -11 O 3 L m O qm m q yC N N Q T C m 9 pJ Wm omw _W U m p k O m E 2= o o E E E o �U m E o m m $ m o 2 > C S O 9 m y E m m + �'m W m O U@ m ~ K W Z E m@@ m H o 000 - N CI V 0 0 M m m� :: V V :! !R m �: m W N | §:■ !\ « «■■k#§ ! « a§§ ■%§ r«k9ak e ! � . ■##._■ ... as 2 ` ! �! §#■ r! ! �� «] �« !§ 7!! !2■n| �! (()( | §w■ §■§.! #■#kmK ! # )f � � |§!! .� a■■ !#i " °#»FB$ a a ; � | !• AM ! ., ; !!• ! � §!!!;m! °)^+|®� |!= !i|| } !j! q27 (� � ASA $! !, � . n u U J m m 9 F o O U p N • t m v o m Ol m N a m vi o a mi o V 0 0 0 n n in o o �� U w m <6 vi o • C O W S U M m N J F o e =O U C �� U w m m n • C O W S U M m N Z W W m n a N o W F N o' W M o m o n o O 0 O E W < E U k W 3 O � U � m N "m .�. .as N o n U v ♦ 6 m Q c m 5 m 0 E N w c m c c F o > > m E m U U d U 1 Z .= N mzl 0 ANNUAL EARNINGS MONITORING REPORT OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., • MID-TEX DIVISION 11[•».10 RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS FOR THE Twelve Month Period Ending December 31, 2003 Check one: This is an original submission ( X ( This is a revised submission [ ] 0 Date of submission: December 17, 2004 4 0 Z� 0O N Sw omro (� O ~ it r mol' W22 UW ou �Zwo LL W p wow a , W< Om ¢ ¢ �nnuQi om`m �p M n vO1i E'im _ t�10 <N�m t0 ON tmD m NIn i2t y tp 00(mp H v N O pPp 0 m Q N Q�' m m N m O w w w w W w w p y C°i'1 N�ftODmh� m m � m m O ' O �1 O OI N Q POJ��r Q 0o N b z � m Q 0 N V w w w w w w w -- 0 U a e � a C N N N N N N N N N N 6 v d O y' 6 [7 O r m 4 O Cl M m e d L 0 V r N YmI O°il O (np � < m t� Nm C ov Q (OnYrNr QmoQ�� o n h r m N f0 N m O N h Nm m d Q v C N A N N �• h O N Q r � N� a N N m Q b O Q N 3 ap 9^ V C d 9 a m ...m ¢ UOS u 9 u= .- —. -.-——— � � � � 0 J � g ¢ OEa E ec�ryram m � vQi fO m� � � m Ym] m W O N a7 Cmml O) ar m mm�NQ� h � m N �O php m ad �^ m enma�m l9 N ppm amL O� ry m ^o mO'm m eHm` r m � tO o w w w w w w f U m a a�9 a ca x m a` a c nw d o LL mm W % d T pCj c p o- {! d *62 mp n y a L — m U c '= d v'a E v m m E 3 EA¢EEc d C z Qp1 N N H C EV C W q a .� xn U V CO U U N u m a U W N C - C 0 d~ G N n d O E Z a O m - p d N 6 d m d O LL O E N d a y D K 6 Z � N J Z Z� 00 N Sw X a W Z N ~ M , ❑ o q � Z W mom W2W U 0 W ozo w ywa� O W J Q N 2 Q Q • W �m m <. E:. c o ry Z Z Z Z Z Z 3V �. HH H a c 3'� m via Q Q Q Q Q Q Z Z Z Z Z Z �Q a o0 0 nc M a n r N d O N Q Q Q Q Q Q a ZZZ ZZZ O F H H H 4 � c L ' p F3."•T a c o. y} Uo i�i N d YI d W a y W W ... yi 000 W `. SIGNATURE PAGE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS -ANNUAL EARNINGS MONITORING REPORT I certify that I am the responsible official of Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division; that I have examined the foregoing report; that to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, all statements of fact contained in the said report are true and the said report is a correct statement of the business and affairs of the above-named respondent in respect to each and every matter set forth therein during the period from December 31, 2002 to December 31, 2003 inclusive. I understand until the issuance of a final order or decision by a regulatory authority in a rate case that is filed after the implementation of a tariff or rate schedule under this section, all amounts collected under the tariff or rate schedule before the filing of the rate case are subject to refund. December 17, 2004 Date ign:m Uce President Rates and Regulatory Affairs Title Address: 300 S. St Paul Street, 8th Floor Dallas, Texas 75201 Phone: 214.875.3613 Email address: charles.yarbrough@atmosenergy.com Alternative contact regarding this report: Name: Douglas C. Walther Title: Senior Counsel Address: 5430 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1800 Dallas, Texas 75240-2601 Phone: 972.855.3102 Email address: douglas.w Ether@atmosenergy.com 0 • 0 N ry W J M W 2 U U) c • E ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 00000{93 (390) D NOF ALL NSIONIERS SYSnM-NUDE FORD94TALWTION, DATEPWCFD PRO.IEG15 PWCED D! GA5 MAHiT@fANCE, AND LY CAS DTILRY PROJECf UTILiTYPWNi UI SERVICE OB CUSFOMFAS REP OF£ACOmcS PWNT O9 NUMBER COST REFRIED DURBVG 20N BBNEFR® LOGTION PURPOSE OF PROJECT SERVICE 00000{93 (390) TOOLSANDEQUIPAffiTT- ALL NSIONIERS SYSnM-NUDE FORD94TALWTION, OC PIIRCHAS- WOHYDRAULIC MAHiT@fANCE, AND SQIlEE2R TOOLS MD STATIC REP OF£ACOmcS Frn`C GROU[DWOFUT 00000569 6j50 HSTALLTOWERLIGHTMOMTOR ALL CUSTOMERS LWAN BUO.DGIGD.A20) Nw U.IPROVEEffNI3 00000683 (nX7) M1RSCd SOUS -UPDATE ALLCUSTOMERS SYSTEM -WIDE UPDATEPRFSSURE Nw PRESSURE CONTROL MONTTORDIG MON[FOR W G FROM PHONE LRS MISCE3IANEOUSOMMOn 00000691 103,]99 ALL CUSTOMERS SYSTEM-WOJE IIPDAIE PHONE SYSTEM Nw PHONE SYSTEM 00000]2] 12,302 TOOLS EEQIJIPMFNT- 5LLCUSTOL4]t3 SY6TA1-WIDE FOR DISTALLAnON, Nw PURCIIASEUTHITYCONBRESSOR MADITENANCE, AND REPMROFFACR. OI OOOOOT{g I8, PROPERTY IMPROVEMENTS- ALL CUSTOMERS BRYAN SERVICE BUDAWGh N. WSTALL3AIRCONDITIOFPo UNI S CENTER U+PROVOM S 000007{] 182,143 PRO ALL CUSTOMERS LOGAltwa T UUMWROU1Gl1.AND JW ACEMRCOF[DOU:NTS- REPLACE AIR CONDTfIOND9G SERVICE PU'ROVEI.IDVTS 00000]48 162990 WoPERTYU.fPROVEMENIS- ALL CUSTOMERS LWAN STREET BUH.DD2G Nw REPWCEROOF SERVICE IEIPROVE6 s OD000949 61,084 PROYER7Y UHPROVEMENTS- ALL CUSTOMERS LOG" STREET BUHAO90ILAND Nw REPWCE SECURITY SYSTEM Smwa CEN II DAPROVE68EME 00000951 30,76) PROPERTYU.PROVEMENIS- ALL COSTOMERS GARLAND BUOADIGILAND N. REPWCE SECURTI'Y SYSTd1 SERNCE U.iPROVEMENTS 00000]52 38,112 PROPERTYNffROVEMENB- ALL NSTOMFRS LOGAN STREET BUHAHJGMND Nw REPWCEPARXUtGLOT SERVICE U.IPROVEMENTS 00000960 7324 PURCHASEOFTRAH.FRFOR ALLCUSTOMERS SYSTEM -WIDE FORWSTAL Mn Dc DAMAGEPREVEMION MAINTENANCEMD RUMROFFACUdTIFS 00000961 4.246 U95TAL MMOFSIWAGE ALL CUSTOMERS ARILENE ErU WOH.A£OD Nw SERVICE CEN ER RdPROVE8ffNT5 0000p762 <146 UJSTALWIION OF SIGNAGE ALL CIISTOLifR3 SAkWCE BUHAUIG MND Nw mRNCE SE CENTFR U.iPROVEMEN'TS OOW0763 3,933 TOOLSADiDEQllH'N1ENT- ALL CUSTOMERS SYSTEM -WIDE FOR WS ION, Nw PURCHASEEQIINOFp 1'FOR R9ASIIIEIiA39CEANT3 "CF, dECTRO£USION OF PLASTIC P@E RFPAHIOFFA 0000096/ 3,638 SYSTE WPROVEMEMB- ALL CUSTOMERS SYSTEM -WIDE OED RFPWCEDAMAGED Nw REPLACERFMOTEIfl.FA4TRY FACO.RffB OOOO m (607) TOOLS EEQUH'MENT- ALL NSTONffRS FOR HISTALWTION, Nw PURCHASEGENERATORSFORGAE MAUGENANCE AND CREWS REPAROFFACO.TTf6S 000009]9 ]-89] PURCHASE OF PORTABLE ALL CUSTOMERSBUU.DWO/LAFID N. BUD.DDIGFORMATEIUALANO ASYS�-�E RBROVEMEMS E IJHMM STORAGE TOOLSANDEQUfPMENT- 00000983 ;155 ALLCUSTOMFRS FOM RNSTANCE.ANDNov PURCHASEGENERATOMFORGAS�R,SREPAHIOFFACRDTES 500007N 50.0{9 TOOLSANDEQUD'MENT- ALLNSTOMERS FOMADRIIdANCE,AND Nw PURCHASE GAS LEAK DETECTION UBh4NTREPAIR OF FACRTTTES 00000788 WWI TOOTS AND EQUJPhD]TT- ALLCUSTOE SYSTFAS-WIDE FORH96 TIOFI Ds FURCH MS STICPBESQU MAMTENANCE•AND TOOLSREPAaOF FACdTTiES Op000A3 919]0 -TOOLSANDE000'M1ffNT- ALL CUSTOMERS SYSTEM -WIDE FOR P`STALLATION, Nw PURCHASETAPPWOG MAINIFNANCF, AND FLUGGU9GvnumI.fENTREPA OFFACH.T 00000796 2,699 TOOLS AND EQUfPNffNT- ALL -CUSTOMERS -SYSTEM -WIDE FORRW�� OFNID. Nw PURCHASE WdDFRGENERATOR C BOUMT REPAROFFACH.T Page 1 of 155 ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 2 of 155 D ON OF COMPLETED DA2EPIAL PROGECTSPL CED W GAS wGASUWIY PROBECT U PLANTWSERVICEOR CUSMME65 PIANTw NUMBER COST RLTBRED DURDTG 200 BENEFEIBD ID( nON PORPOSEOFPROIECF SM"U 00000797 271,646 TOOLSA EQITRMFNT- ALLCUSTONIERS SYSTEM -WIDE FORWSTaL MO)1 Nw PI3RCHASEFRESHAREQU@NRNT MAINTFNANCE,AND FORGASCREWS REPAROFFAC=S OD wl 6.]30 PROPERTYD.IPROVEMENTB- ALL CUSTOMERS WACO SERVICE B=WGa.AMI N. OFFICE CONSTRUCTION CENTER IMPROVENDINB OOW0509 2,853 TOOLSA EQO8'MENf- ALL CUSTOMERS SYSTEM WIDE FORMSTALLATION, N. PURCRASEELECTROFUSION MABTTE63ANCE, AMI PROCESSOR REPAROF FACB.R ES 00000813 5,619 TOOLSANDEQUIPff - ALL CUSTOMERS SYSTEM -WIDE FORMSTALLARON, Nw PURCHASEHORRONTALBORMG MAWTENANCE,AMI MACHINE RFPARi OFFA=DES 00000818 1,305 TOOLSANDEQ131PMENT- ALL CUSTOhffRS SYSTEM -WIDE FOR WSTALLATION, N. PURCHASE6•COMPLBTIONPLUG I MAINTENANCE, AND HOLDER HEPAROFFA=DES 00000824 20,605 SYSTEMISiPROVEM1t.DWTS- ALL CUSIOMER.4 SYSTEM -WIDE UPGRADE COMPRESSOR N. UPGRADE CNOCOMPRESSdt 00000825 2,167 TOOLS AMJ EQUD'MENT- ALL CUSTOMERS SYSTEM -NIDE FOR wSTALLATON, N. PURCHASE GENFRAroRS FOR OAS MAAdROFF CEAND CREWS REPAROFFACRIIffi 00000830 {8,1]1 PROPERTYR.BROVEBRMS- ALL CUSroMERS ABB£NE ILV�S W. RROPERTY SERVICE B.@ROVEMENTS UAFRO 00000831 38,696 BAP PROPERTYO.RROVEMENTS- ALL CUSTOSID35HEB CE B OWG/LAMI N. REPLACEROOF oFFa OAS OFFICE IMPROVEh4M3 00000832 5418) PROPERTY WPROVpI¢NTS- ALLCUSTOEfERS ARLWGTON BUR.DINGR.ATID Nw NSTALL SECURITY SYSTEM ID OVEN s W 839 2173 TOOLSANOEQUIPhRNT- ALL CUSTOMERS SYSTEM -WIDE FORWSTALLAMON, Nw PIIRCUASEGENERATORFORGAS MAINTENANCE, AND CREWS REPAROFFA=ES 00Wp82 40,742 PROFERTYW4PROVEMENTS- ALLCUSTOMRLS LOGAN STREET BUR.DWGh N. R£PLACEROOF SERVICE WFROVFMENTS 00000855 6,000 PROPERTYD.iPROVESWNIS T ALLCUSTOSRRS LOG" STREET BURDINGO.ATID N. A56OCIATEDWRHDLSMANTLING SERVICE WIPROVE8IDTi5 SMRAGEBUBDWGS 00000858 12,000 PROPERTY MROVRMEMR- ALL=TONID55 GREENVRLE BUBDWGA.NID N. CONSTRUCTRBTAWDIOWALL SERVICE U&ROVEM1ffN35 00000859 2,140 PROPERTY R.RROVEMENTB- ALL CUSTOS ARLWGTON BMDWGILANO Nw REPLACEARCONDTITONWO B.B'ROVEMENIE 00000363 4,450 PROPERTY WPROVEI.4RT5- ALL CUSTOMERS WA3W3ACHR BI3dDINGILAND Nw REPLACEARCONDITTONWG GAS OFFICE B ROVEMENIS 00000&76 3,026 TOOLS EQUPM1DNT- ALL CUSTOMERS SYSTEM -WIDE FORINSTALLANON, N. PURCHASEPRELOCATOR MAINTENANCE AND REPPROFFAMMIS 00000&7 101,135 TOOLS MID BQUD'NRTIT- ALL NSTOMERS SYSTFAS-WIDE FORWSTA KDON, Nw PURCHASEOPOCAL MEIHAN6 MAINTENANCEAND DETECTORS REPAR OF FACEITTES 00000883 5,196 TOOLSANDEQUB'MFNY- ALL CUSTOMERS SYSTEM -WIDE FORwSTALLATION, N. PURCHASEHANDTOOLSFOR MAWTFNANCE,AND MARTTQIANCEOFMGH REPAROFFACOlT1E4 PRESSURE MAINS OMOOOBM 4,671 ro SA EQ�- ALLCUSTOMERS SYSTEM -WIDE FORWSTAL VON, Nw FURCHASEY" MHOLEHOO MAINTENANCE, AND BORNO MISSRE REPAROFFACD3TIES 00000894 2,OW PROPERTY O.fPROVEMENTS- ALLCUSTOMERS LUGANSTREBT BUBDWGA.NiD N1ar D13TALLDUCTWORRFOR SERVICE WROVF3AElRS SAFETY AND TRAW WG OFFICES 00000913 (1117) =LSAMIEQ�- ALLNSTOMETLS SYSTEM -WIDE FORNSTALLAMON, Fm PURCHASEEQI3R'MENTFOR MAD3TR3ANCEAND CONFDIED SPACE VEMCLE REPAR OF FACB.IDES 00000914 (1,677) SYSTFMRRROVEBffi4TS- ALL CUSTOARRS SYSTEM -WIDE UPORADE SCADA On INGRADESCADASYS' SYSTEM 00000924 (900) SYSTEM OGROVEIAFNI$- ALLCUSTOMER4 HAMWTON WSTALLANON OR Sep WSTALL 2• MOONEY REGULATOR R1B3ACEMENTOF MFASUREMENTOR REGULATION Page 2 of 155 • c ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 3 of 155 O ON OP p.AlE P1ACED PROJECTS PLACED W GAS aGAS IITDfIY PROJECT U PLANT M SERVICE OR NSTOMERS PLNT LY NUMBER COSF REFOtEDDORiNG2063 BENEFIFED LOCATION PIIBPO.SEOFPROJECF MRYICE 00000935 21,117 PROPERTY0 OVENIDXTS- ALLCOSTOMERS LOGANSTREET BURAB.`GILANLI Nov REPLACE SECURITY SYSTEM SmR a APROVEMEMS 00000936 35,987 PROPERTYI OVII.BiN]M $- ALLCOSToF MORNOJOEB]E BMDOIGILAFOJ Nov REPLACE SENRRY SYSTEM SERVICE BAROVEhB:N3M 3 FORT 00000962 9536 SYSTEM PPROVFMPNIS- ALL CUS70MF3L4 BROWNWOOD WSTAL nON OR Dec UPGRADE MEASURESIENT REPLACEAffiNT OF EQUPMENT MEASUR9.PNTOR REOUL1nON 00000963 9,618 SYSTEM wFROVFA4tJ'B- ALLCIISTOh BROWNWOOD WSTALLAnW OR Da UPGRADEDLSTRICTREGUWITOR REPLACEMENT OF MUM MEASUREMENT OR RFAULAnON 000009M 4,330 PROPERTY DPROVEMENTS- ALL CUSTOMERS MV oSERVICE BITO.DWORAND Nov REPumC coN mO G CEBmR IMPROVELffNTS 00000954 ;Oil PROPERWWPROVEMENTB- ALL CUSTOb DENTON BMDD2GRAND Nov REPLACEARCO=ONO3O SERVICE DPROVEbffN15 WMI24 51550 mwR RmaE SUBD ON ALL CUSTOFRffi5 FORT WORM SYSnM W"MON J. DUETONSTOMFR 009'15288 (918) WSTA AnON OF PPE AFID RESmENTW. FRISCO SYSTEM EX "MDN J. APPURTENANCES-DISTALL 3.155 DIIETONSTObDR FEEFOF 0.'15• PLASnCPPE, I,AO GROWTH FEET OF 2-MMnC PPE, AND 2,850 FEET OF 3 -PLA CPPE, Wml REONBURSFMENTFIIOM REDIIESTWG NSTOMFR 04925812;(3.168) DISTALLATIONOFPPEAND ALL NSTOb COLLEGE SYST EXPANSION Nov APPURTENANCPS-DRVELOPpt MOOR DUE TO CUSTOMER B85TALLED 590FEE1'OF d• OROWIH PLASnCPPE,1,000 FEET OF O.T5' KL rc PPE, MID P18TALL L460 FEET OF Y PLASTIC PIPE FOR TRE mownSYSTFMB.PROVEAffNTb- ALL NSTONPRS SYSTEM -W R ADMBOSTRATIVENEEOS Dm PURCHASE COM1WUIER 00980203n30ISANDBQIIPAIDJT- ALL NSfOMERS SYS9EM-W E FORDISTALFAnOFI, Od PURCI3ASETOOLS MADTIENApCE, ANDROPAROFFAN.INS00981031ROSTA15AnON OF POE AND NMMERCW. DALLAS SYSFEMEXPANS30N Feb TENANCEB-INSTALL;954 DUETONSTOMFR OF2"PLASIICFM WITH GROWTH IREQR@.IDIIRSEMENTFAOM UE9T3NG NSIOMERS OWBIWB (1,3W) OFPP CObD+ID6CW. DALLAS XPANSION SUF tuo PURLAnON L PURTENANCFS-INSTALL 135 DILE TONSTOMER TO ETOF 8• PLABTIC PPE, Wmi iom�O=TOWR GROWTH OIBIIRS OM W9818W (12,&19) MTA I1AnON GF AND COMMOtCW. D@ITON SYSTIDIION Feb S APPURTENANCES - WBTS TML 100 DILE TOMSTO8TOF1Eli 1.OF3' STIC PPE GROWnT FN 3,OW FEET OF 3' PI,ASnCPOE, 3.MF WTIH REI.XIBURSFTOW FROM UFSTINGNSTP8 OW8343> (5,118) OF PPEAND RESmENIIAL FERRIS SYSTEME)PAOMNR Feb APPVRLAnON DUETONSTOMFR DISTIUBUTION FACdITPS, WRH DlS`OUTENAN FACUA XS, GROWTH RSLTID FROM W985126 7A58) AnANO ATION OFP NAII.ffRCW. SFPRIAAN J. BALL Applux TALL DIlETO NSIOM1IDt DMTOEXPA WR DIST&®UHONFACR.om Wml DlSMBENAN FACax GROWm RER.iBi1RSEhffNT FROM RE IIESTDTG NSTONfER M8%16(550) DISTALLAnON OF PPEAND COLLEGE SYSTEM EXPANSION Nev APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER STAnON DUETONSTOMER WSTMLm UM FEET OF 2' �ALLW51V—j GROWTH PLmnc PPE AND 350 FEET OF 0.25' PLASTIC PPE FOR THE Page 3 of 155 • C� 11 ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF RUNG PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 4 of 155 D DAIS PUA PROJECTS PIACEDw GAS WGASDTILFFY PAOJECF Il'IR.1'1'Y FL mSERVICE OR CTISFOm" FL m NUIOBER COST RETTREDDIRING200 BFJAEMIED LOCATION PURPOSEOFPRQJECF SERVICE 00997580 (680) wSFALLATION OF PTE AND RESmENnec ABO.ENE SYSTQAEXPANSION Feb APPURTENANCES-WSTA us DUETOCUSFOMFR =OF 2' PLASNCMAIN, WRH GROWTH REB.IDURSPAtENFFROM RE VESTING C113FOMFR 01960202 1,618 MISCELLANEOUS-FURCIGSE ALLCUSTObE1S SYSTEM-WDE OFFICE EQUB .`t Dx WSCFLLANEOUSEQI3WMENT OIWW52 58,985 SYS IWROYEMERS- ALL CUSIOMEiS SYSFFM-WIDE ADWMSTRATNEN®S Da PURCHASE COMPUTER 0000906A (562) TOOLS AND EQ2IO'bffiNF- ALLCUSIOMERS SYSTEM-WDE FOR wSFA VON, Da REFLACEGENERATORUSEDBY MAwTINANCF,AND GAS CREWS REPAROFFACOIFAS 0000908* (563) TOOLS AND E000A - ALL CUSTOMERS SYSTFM-WDE FORDSTALLATION, Dec REP OENERATORUSEOIBY MAINIENANCF,AND GASCREWS RFPAROFFACI=S OW0909A (7,617) TOOLSAbm EOUDtt.@NF- ALL NSTOMERS SYSFFM-WIDE FORINSFALLATION. Dec REPLACE6F].ECIROFUSION MAO41 MCF, AND TOOLS REPAIROFFAC¢ITIF-4 WIMAW1 2,TJ7 TOOLSANDEQUWMETF- ALL=OMFRS SYSTEM-WDE FORw ALLANON, Nov REPLACE OENERAMRUSm BY MAINFERANCE,AND GAS CREWS REP*IROFPACOTFffB 1OMUG (58.705) NSTALLATIONOFPWEAND COMW.ERCLU. =0 SYSIEMES "%ON Feb APPURTENANCES -INSTALL DUHTOCUSFOMER DLSTIUBMON FACO.RRS, WISH GROWTH REDWURSEMENTFROM IREQMTwO CUSTOMER 11109906 (9,756) LOMMERCW. MMMOI SYSTEMER "MON Feb APPURTENANCES -INSTALL DUETOCUSTO JWTALLATIONOFPTEAND DIET*BU ONFACMXfflS,WRN GROWTH REUDUREEMENTFROM RE UESTDlO CU MW R 1120586 (4,835) w3FALLAITONOFPB'EAND COW.RRCIAI. ORANDPRAIRIE 5YSTFMEEPANSION Feb APPURTIIIANCFS-INSTALL DUETUCUSTOMEt DISRUBUTIONFACO.ITIES, WFFH GROWTH RE3WIHUREFMENFFROM G CUSTOMS 11232330 662,T/8 R60CATIONOFFACB.1TffS- ALL CUSFOh1ERR.5 DESOTO RELOCA'IIONNAVOD Sep FELBC DHON CONFUW/PROPOSm FACO.FfIES DUETO UEMFHIGHWAY PRO= RECONSTRUCTION 11271350 (8,9R) INSTALLATION OF PO• COMwmRCW. GRAND PRAR@ SYSIFMESD'ANSION MDY APP2RIENANCFS-wS DUE iOOR .L DISIRRUTION fACERIES, WIII1 OROATFIWIH AEDIDURSFDfEHTFROM 1410 NSTOMEt 11211862p (41,850) INSTALLATION OFP RESDEN'[IAL '[HECOLONY SYSTFb1FXPMWR Dc STE APPURTENANCES-wS DILE iOCUST08ER DISTIUBIISION FA 4, WFIH . lmoUESIINoFOMIERR GROWTH FROIA RERRIRSEMffl1TFROM 112990W (0.1M) INSTALLATIONOFOF PIM AND COMMEMJAL DESOTO SYSFEMEXPANSION 88ec APPURTENANCFS-M81'ALL DLIE TBNSRIbDR DISTRDUTION FACO.IFIES. WFIH GROWTH REO.RURSEMff}1'FFROM RE UESTINONSTOMER 71413736 (10,630) wSTALLATON OF PIPE AND COhwffitCW. RVINO SYETEMERPANSION Apr APP FS -INSTALL DUETONSTOMER NOON DISTRBUNON iACLLTTIFS, WITH GROWER RED.GIIRSFMETli FROM UESTITOMDR 1111406 (3.106) INSTALLATION nONOOF PO•E AND COIrRff1tCW. GAwE$VO.LE SYSTTOMTO9 J. DUE TONSTOMER DBMEIENANCFS-wsiALL DLSTR®UTION FACO.RmS, WITH GROWTH REMO:NFPROM RE UFSTINommI O CUISTOMEt Page 4 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID -TU DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF RUNG PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 5 of 155 DFS ONO C MP DATEPI m PROJECTSP MDWGAS wCAS U3DJIY PBOJECT UPIWTYPIANTWSERWCEOR CUSTOMERS PIANIw NUMBER COSJ RETUtEDDURWG20R3 BENEFITED LOCATION PORPOSEOFPROJECT SERVICE 11420M0 (1,131) WSTALLAHONOFPREANO COMhRAC4V. CARROUL SYSTFb15%P MON J. APPURTENANCES-DISTALL DU MWSTOARR DISTR B=ONFA®.IFIES, WRN GROWTH REU.IBURSEMENTFROM REQMTNG CUSTOMER 1143609G (I.T39) WSTALLATIONOFPREA RFSmE3913AL IOWA PARE SYSTBMERPANSION Feb APPURhT1010E5- WSTAI.L 33U DUETOCUSTOh FEET0F2-PLASHCMW WITH GROWTH REOABURSEMffNPFROM VESFRIGNOFP R]t 1148434G (4,160) 3NSTALLAHON OF PRTA RESmENTW. MANSFID.D Aup APPURTENANCFS-WSTALL DM TORIRANSION DUE TOOUSTOMER DIS]R®UTION FAW.RIFS, WfIH GROWTH RFROM MUESRS o m uFsrWocusroMER 11998890 ry0je'n WSTALLATION OE O COFU.mtCW. CARROLLTON SYSTEMERPAN310N My MSTE APPURTENANCFS- WSTALL DUEro NSTOMER DISTA®UHON FACR.om WFUI GROWTH REP.BURSF M UESIWG CUSrobmt CUSM 11I989Hi (3,A5) WSTALL.9ANCESPPE CO6AffRCW. CARROLLTON SYSTEN.E%PANSION My L WSTALL DUEro LT33TOMER DISU BENAN FA DISIAIBUTION FACU.ITIPS, WITH GROWTH REMEMFROM REQUPSTWmmi O 11507790 (3,945) WSTALLA PVER CObAftlfCW. ARLWOroN SUEMFXPANBION AX m WSTA NCFS=ES,L DUEroCUSfOMER J�=U DISTRieVHON FACUSFIFS, WFIH DISMBM GROWTH RED.iBURSFMENTFROM RE UESTPIG CUSCOMVR IISSHOG 11,908 WSTALLATION OFPIPE AND RESmENT1AL BRIAN SYSTEMERPANSION len DUE TOOUSTOMER INET DISTES-DEVELOPFA IBUHON GROWTH FACU.R'E9FORTHECOLRANY FA=ESFOR 11549306 (832) LOMARRCW. COPPFII. SUE MEXPANSION May WSTALL "MRTAMMS wnE APPIRiT@7AN DUEro CUSTOMER FA WSTRIBUIION FACUJIIFS, WRH GROWTH REB.MURSEMENTFROM RE GCIRTObffR 116001N3 (29.2s4) wSTALLAHON OP PRE AND DNUSTRIAL DALLA9 SYSTFMERPAN90N Feb DUEroCUSI'OMER DISMBFNANCES-WSMS. D[STR®URON FAm.Im WfIH GROWTH RWUESRSFDiFN'F£ROM UESTWGCUS Ila)WG (10]57) ME INSTALLATION OF PRE AND CONibffRC4U. DENfON SYSTEM EJ(PANSION lm ENANCES-WSFES, DUE TOCUSTOMER DISIRIBUHON FACLLITIES, WHH IXSU GROWTH REB.ffiURS[bR]9'T FROM RE GCUSFOMER 11632960 (I5,131) DISTALLAHON OFNSTA COMMERCIAL PFLUGFAVBIE SUETDCUANS10N Feb APP11RB=NCFS-WSTALL DU6ro OUSFOMER D6TRURSE FACdIiIFS, WHH GROWTH pmuESRSEMENTFROM UESTIMNOffOMFA IIM2920 (19.074) WSTALLATION OF PRE AND COM1AfERCLLL WICHITA FALLS SYSTEM EIRANMON Apr APPURTENANCES-WSTALL pUTTT C[RTOMER D(STRiR ON FACDATRS TO GROWJH SERVE COEO.RRC W. CUSTWER WST RE EROM 1167U 10 (3S6D) TIONS PMP WSTALLATION OF PREAND COLAfERCW. GUNTER SYSIFMEEPANSION Feb DILEro O75TObRJt DISTRms FACD.PTIE9, WHH DISTMENANCFS-W S. GROWTH RED+UESR QOiNFFROM RE VESTING CUSroMFA Page 5 of 155 Ll • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Paga 5 of 155 O OFCOMPI.ETSD DAmEP FF=C ISPLACEDwGAS WGA8O5IIT1Y PRO/ECf 12515]TYPL INSERY10EOR NSTOMEDS P w NUMISER COS! RRTIREDDURINGlm BENE 1) LOCATION PURPOSEOFPROIECS SERVICE 11055M (2,015) R95TALLATIDNOFPMEAND W2R.IDtCLLL DALLAS SYSTEMM"SION Mu APPURTENANCES-wSFALL w5ET0 WSTO DLSTRIB=M FACR,Dw3, W1Tig GROWTH RE MgEMENFFROM RE DF3TING CUSTOMER I IM3150 (3,692) D28TALLATION OF PME AND CORAf cR MCC.wb1EY SYSIFMEXPANSION Feb APFURTFNANCFS-w3TALL DUETOCUsTObffR DLSTRR5UTIONFACUITMS. WEDS GROWTH RER.IDURSEI"O mom UE5MG CUSTOb1FR lITl m (9,118) WgTALLATIONOFPIPEAND WMMRRCIAL ADDISON SYSTII.SEXPANSION Aug APPURTENA m-MSTALL DUETOCUSFOAffiR DISTRDSI NFACRli@S,WEDI GROWTH RFAIOURSEMENTFROM RE NsTobff lITL591G (4,024) wST ATIONOFPR'EAND COD9ffRCW. FFLUGERV M SYSTE4E "SION Mry APPURTENANCES-wSTALL DUETOCUSTO DISTRIBOTIONFACD]TIFS. W OROWIH REO.10UR3EMENFFROM MQMT Wsmb 11966506 (1,099) INSTALLATIONOFFBEAIID CDIAAERCLV. BRIDGEPORT SYSTEM EXPANSION lm APPURTENANCES-MSTALL212 DUETOCIIST016FR FE WTPLASFICME.W GROW RED.IDURSEMFNTFROM IREOMTRJG CUSTOMER 1196691M (5,111) STAONOFPE N COID MGON SDYIgLE Fb wmm-wA MEMORN TGOMRWOEWSSMTFOi SM3ONFA�.W 10INGNSM INRM (1,N9) ONOFPBEAND COMMFRCW. GRANDPRARUE SYMM E%PAN310N Apr MgON FACR3TffS, W!'N2 MG GROWTH2HEFITFROM WSTOMER (Z,015) D15TALLATION OF PR4TA AESIDENTW. GEORGEPOWN SYSIEMEXPANMON Nov L DUEN WSTOMER DISMgENANCFS-DISTALL DLSTRwUTIONF GROWTH (6,3A5) OF wSTALLAITON OF PBE AND COMbffRCW. LW3AN SYS]EMEXPANSION IW dll�30 APPUR] N DUE i0003PObffR DLSTRwUIION FACR.PDFS, W[IH FAmn= GROWTH REDSBURSEMENPFROM RE UFSIWGXOFPMER (3,919) R.9TALLATION OFP COMAfERCW. ADDISON MFXPANSION Fed STS ENANCFS-wSTALL DUETO CUSTOMER DM DI511tID11130N FACRdTff_S. WPFH DISU GROWTH REOWURSEMENTFROM UESTD2IOHOFPbffR (1,250) w3TALLAT(ON OF PR'TA WBO.IDtCM2. MESQUITE SYSIEMF3@ANSION Air AFPUoFrKCFS-wBTALL311 DUE TOCUSTOM14]e FEEFOF 2"PLASTIC WPFH GROWOI om RF3MB[RtSFbffNTFROM RE TMO WSIOMFR 11832166 (b,605] wSTALLATIONOF PD WbR.ffRCW. FORNEY SYSIPMEXPANSION JW L APPU2 NCPS-wSTALL OUE Ib WSTONIDt DISTRwUT10N FACR.RRiS, WITH GROWTH RBQREwwURSEGIDJTFROM UES CUSTOb4R 11851466 (1, -AI) w3TALLAnATION O£PR4E ATID COA4+4ACW. BANoflU BYSTFMEXPANSION AW APPURTRNANCFS-DISTALL 6)0 DUE iONSIOSffR FE£F OF T PLASTICPIPE, WITH GROWDI RF3MBURSEMENTFRQN RE IIESFING WSTOMER II85IOSG (18,535) wKnk ATION OF PIPA WMMERCIAL HALTOM CPIT SY3TEMERPANSION J. APPURTE MET DUE'GRO S b4]t OXFSM=S,L DLS'IRR3UTIONFAFROM WITH GROWTH RFA1BLTiSFMENTFROM RE G WSTOb1FR Paga 5 of 155 c • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 7 of 155 o OF DATE pL m PROJECTS PIACED M GAS W OAS UHI.peY PROJECT UTTLTTYPL INSIU&Wa OR CUSIOHPec PLAN'TW NUMBER COST RESHIED DORWG]0H RENEWTED LOCATION PURPO9QOFPROJECI SERY/CE 11860HG (34,050 SYSFEM IMPROVQ+IDOS- ALLCUSFOh4HS ROUNDROCR FORTRl nON OR JW FORTIFICATIONOFOFFSRE SYSIFMIbiPROVFMEM' MAWS, WFOJ PARTIAL RE0.IDUREFMFNTBY 11922890 (2,625) INSTALLATION OF ME AND CON4.O35CML GRAPEYD9E SYSTEMEKPANSION Dc APPURTINANCFB-INSTALL DUETOCUSTONIER DiSTR =ONFAMMES,W GROWTH REWIDURSQ.4NF FROM RE llEST GCUSTOMER IIH334G (mm) SYSTHMD.IPROVEMENTS- ALL NSTOMERS ROJDON FORTWICATION OR Ape FOR4F1CAT10NOFOFFSITE SYSTEM IIPR0VE84T'T MAWSWISHREIIBE Ni BY VI 11915/IG (2,788) ION AND WSTALLATION OF PRE RESIDENML ROUND ROCK SYSTPM&BANSIGN Da APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUE TOOUSTOFIER WBTALLEDFMMEU40N GROW TH FACRFF�S FOR THE COMPANY 11943]36 49,498 WSTALLATIDN OF P4EAFID RFSIDENML R011ND ROCK SVSTFMEXPANSION Mry APPURTENANCES-DEYGLOPFR DUE TOOUSFOMF]t WSTAEDDISMB=ON GROW FAPFORMEOMN 11959170 (2,]90) WSTLLAnONPIPEND CN RWG VMXANSIO Ds ANm- DUETOCIISTONffR MES. DISTR®UTR4I FACD.TFNS, WITH GROWFH EAffNFFROM REQUESTING VESTINGNOFPU F]t 11961510 (33,390 WSTALLA40N OFPBE AND CONIMERCW. TAYLOR SYSTEMEXPANSION Sep APPURTENANCES-WSTALL DUE TONSTOMFR DISTR®U40N £ACD.Rffi4. WITH GROWTH REQ.®URSEAffN[FROM RE CUSIONiLR 119fiERG 506$08 OCAMOG RELOCAE20'S ALL CUSTOMERS DALLAS RELOCATTONTOAWID Feh PC DIS- REPLACE20'SCN COIffLICFWJPROPOSED O@EDUETO RECONSTRUCDOFP iDOHWAY PROJECT' 11982856 26683 WSTALLATION OFP RESIDENTIAL EUI.FSS SYSTPMFJO'ANSION My STA L APPURTENANCES-WSTALL DUE TOCIBTONIDt DISTR]RIITION FACRI GROWTH 11963986 8,]95 WSTALLATION OF PQ'E AMI COMM1IDtCW. DALLAS SYSTFMEXPANSION Im APPURTENANCFS-WSFALL DUE'Gilo OMER DISTRIBUITIWOFP.iE GROWTH 119H93G (8,'Afi) WSTALA40N OF P@E AND RESIDENTIAL CEIIARPARK SYSFEMEKPANSION Dec DUE POCUSTOb1ER DISMBENANCES-WSI'AI3. DIETAWUIION FACn mcc GROWFN 119939/6 (4,011) WSTALLA40N OF COMMERCW. SFAOOVQ.LE MF]@ANSION J. APPURTENANCES-PISTALL450 INSTaD DUE DIIE]ONSIOMIR FEEFOF 4' PLASTIC IBE, WITH GROWTH RE0.03URSFAIDV'FFROM RE Iff.SIW6CUSTONIER 11991216 (468) WStALLATION OF PD`EAND RESIDENTIAL PFLUGFRVRLE SYSIEMWANSION Aug APPURTENANCES -103 DIR3 T0CUSF01.fER FEEF OF 3'PIA5TIC PIPE. P@E, WITH GROWTH FROM UFSTWG CUSTOMER TOMER 12109630 iJSI OTDOFFA6- DALAS ID RELCPRR Fd AESR® CONICTWIPRGTOD FAdOASAUTOP O]ECT L 121346 (4,30 WATIOH OF PEPE COMMFACW. GRATID PRAQt� SYEIFA1P00• JW NSTA APPURTFNANCES-WSTALL OMICNER DUE TOCUSTOn4R DISTRBUITON FAC6ITff_S. WITH OROWRf REIfBUESEMFMFROM UESTQR'CUSTONIER 13180226 (0) WSTALLATTON OF PIPE RESIDEN'ML BRYAN EYSLPMEtYAN510N J. m5TA L AP57fRIB ANCFS-WSTALL DUET000STO- DISTR®U40N FACIlI'!IlS GROWTH Page 7 of 155 CJ • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Pegs 8 O 155 DMCR D DAi P3ACED PRQ3ECISPLACED W GAB PIGASIRO.RY PR028CT UTDdIY PLANT W SMWV OR C WOMBRB P W N080¢R COST RETIREDDU G20R3 BENRFPPED IACATION PURPOSEDFPROJBCT SERVICE 1220866Ce (763) WSTALLATTON OF PIPE AND COhAR = GRAND PR SYSTEM EXPANSION Sep APPURTENANCES-WSTALL 200 DUETONSTOMER =OF 6-PT.ABTTCP@E AND 150 GROWTH =OF 2' PLASTICP@E WITH REB.IHURSE3JkNIFROM -MQMMGLTJSTO6fER M45570 (32,134) INSTALLATTONOFPWEAND RE4IDENFTAL RENOON SYSTEM EXPANSION Oct APPURTENANCES-WSTALL DwEtt STOM DISTRIBUTION FACdiiffR GROWTH 122gb21G (1900 WSTALLAHONO MEANO COMMERCIAL Mt G SYSTEM EXPANSION N. APPNOTENANCPS- WSTA DUE TOCIJSTOMER DIBTRI ONFA�. WITH GROWDT REErIDURSERIENTFROM RE UESTWOCUSTOKDA 1]308916 (5,883) WSTALLAHON OFP@EAND COMhffliCW. GRROIITON SVS1ANSION Aq APPNtT NCFS-DJSTALL DUE TOMSiOCUSiOMER DISTR®UIION FACR.FfIES, Wl1H GROWDi RER.®UR GE CUS UFRTWGTOMpt 12336520 (982) DISTALLATION OF PBE AND WMMERCW. ARLlltGTON SYSThMEXPANs10N Sep APPURTENANCES-INSFALL DUE TOLIJSTOR10f D6TR®[IIION FACO.ITIES,WTTH OROWIH KER.IBURSE6G;NTFROM CUSTOMER 13N389G (5,033) WSTALLADON OF PIPE RFCIDENTW. BURI3SON SYSIFMEXPANSION J. U ENANCES-INSTALL DllE TOLTJSTOAffR DISTRIDUIIONFACLLITIFS DIS GROWTH /2316236 (31,300) PSTALLATION O£PBEAND RESIDENTW. DALLAS MEXPANSION Nw APPURTENANCFS-LYSTALL DY DUE TOCUST� I'HES DISTALLXTI GROWTH 123805/0 (1A95) NOFF INSTALLATION OFPBE AND COMR¢RCW. CEDARPARK SYSTEMEXPANSION N. APPURTENANCES-LYSIALL DUE iOOUSiOMPTt DISIRBUTONFA�, WITH GROWTH R@iBURSD.ffIV'CFROM G NSTOMFR 12414186 (26,010) D13TALLAR(Ni OPP@EAND RESIDENTIAL DALLAS SYSTPlAEXPANSION N. APPURTENANCFS-RJSTALL DUE iOOIJSTOMFR DISIR®UTION FACLL� GROWDt I241f010 (9,4N) WSTALLATON OF P�AND COEAfERCW- FARMERSVB.LE SYBTFMET@ANBION UP APPURTENANC6-DISTALL DUE TOCIJSTOMER DISTR®UTION FACB.IIIES, WITH GROWTH RE16®URS FROM G c WS .�R 12421RG (1.811) OFP WSTALLATION OFPWEAND RESIDtOJTTAL DALLAS SYSIFMEXPANSION J. APPURTENANCFINSTALL DUE TOCIJSTObffR DISTRD3UliONFACACRIT@S GRO 124/0636 (9933) SYSTEM D.ffROF- ALL NSTOtAER$ IRVWG FORTffIGT[O TIONOR On FORTiF1GT10N 0OF MSOFFSITE MAWS. WRRRER.IDURSO.fENf SYSTEM BdPRO� ETRE UESHNGCUSTO[AER I2M3010 (8jD1) WSlALLAHON OF PPE AND COMMFRCW- TRYING SYSTHMEXPANSION N. R ENANCFS-WSPALL DUETOOUSTORIDt OIBTR®UTION FACRITTFS, WITH DIST OROWIH REB.IDURSFMFM FROM RE UES'IWGCUSIOMER 12135T>G 832 WSTALLAHON OP RESIDENOAL LANGSIFR SYSTQAEXPANSION Aug WSTA WSTALL APPIIRT=ON DUE TO CIJSTOE4R FS- DISTR®OTTON FAW.IIDS GROWTH 12/63690 (3962) WSTALLATION OFPBEAND COMMERCIAL KELETN SYSIFMEXPANs10N Sep APMIRTFNAI.'CFS- INSTALL 510 DUE TOCUSTOMER FEET OF 2'PLABTIC WITH GROWTH om RER.®URSFMENTFROM RE UESIINGCUSTORffR 12465636 134027 RELOGHONOFF PS- ALL CUSTOMERS LAKE DALLAS REIACATIONTOAVOID Apr RELOGTE DISTR®UTIMUITON CONFLICT W/PROPOSm ASARF3ULTOF PROJECT HIGHWAY RECONSTRUCTION HIGD AY Pegs 8 O 155 11 11 ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 9 M 155 DESCR O O TED DA.RM m PRWECIH PLACED W GAS p GM pin. PROOELT UTdFTYPW WSMWY OR COS[083ERS PLWTp NUMBER COST RETREDDIHIQiG2003 BENEFITED TgCATON PURPOSEOFPRO2F.CT SFFYICE 12617RG (7,947) OISTALLATON OF ME AND COLA1PR BURNEF SYSTEM E%MUON Sep APPURTENANCES-MTALL 613 DIIETOCUSTOMER FEETOF Y PLASTIC PMEAND 200 GROWTH FEET OF 1.25' PLASTIC ME, WITH REOIDURSEMENTFROM REQIIESIB4C CUSTOMER 13627970 (4�M) DJSIALLATONOFP@EAN'D COMMER DECATUR SYSTEMF "SION Nov APPURTENANCES-D.'SIALL L060 DmNSTOh63t FFETOF2'ML CP@EWTIH GROWTH REBdBURSEAffNI'FROM iMP CUSTOFffR 12642610 12,4M SYSTEM B.IPROVEBfENTS- ALL CUSTOMERS MFSQUTIE REPLACE AP REPLACE835FEEP OF DiFRAS1RUCNBJi PU W 3'PLASTIC $'I 12fi731fiG $3,$81 n835 FFTOP FA RELOCATEDMMBC RDS- ALT. CUSTOMERS MESQUITE RELOCATONTOAVOD3 Ape RELOCATEDISTR®UIION CONFLICTPROPOS® FACII.I11E4 ASA RFSULTOP PRO= ALLEY WOJFNMG 1268]980 (1}32) DIEIALLATMhI OFPD'EAIID RFSB3ENTW. CEDARPARK SYST146ERPANSION Nw APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUE TONSTOMER O7SIAILEDDISIRIBUTON OROWIII FACB.IT@S FOR THE COMPANY 12717770 I,T/5 DTSTAI2ATON OF P@TA RESmENTAl ARLDJ6TON SYSTFMEI@ANSION hLy APPURBMONFAFS-INSTALL D UE TOOUSTOMER OGSTR C GROWTH 127M55G (10 90) DISTAIBAnOTON OF PHTIPEAND RESmENTAL DALLAS SVSN5N Im S-TA DUOOUSOp DISM®=OXFAR GRO 127336 (6,NI DSTATOOFOEN COMMERCIALHAGM SYSTEMERPANSION Rb APPURTENANCES-DISIAL1190 HH GHIS DIUi TO CUSTOMER F@T'OF 2"PLASTC PIPE WITH GROWHI REDIDURSFMEM FROM RE CUSTOMER 12765560 (33,017) SYRIEMI8IffNTS- ALL CUSTOMERS ARLDJGTON FOR'IWICATONOR Dec FORTIEICAUON TON OFOF OFFSRE SYSTEM D.@ROVEMENf MADIS, WCM REO.@IIRSEM1ffNI BY UEUONOFPPE IDt 12TT2TlG (J,WO) OF PBE AND RE9mFNML GEORGEIDWN SYSTEMEXPANSION Nw JMT"FURLATON APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUE TOCUSIOME0. INSTALLEDDISIR83UTON GROWTH FACdI'OFS FOR TIE COMPANY 12]>l<6G (2b,l%) NSTALLAUONOFPWEA COAAffRCW. IRVpG SYSIEMFXPANSION STAPPURFENANCE4- MBTETSTA 740 DUE TONSIOMER FEELOF4'PIASTC WRH GROWT3 RE0.ffiURSEl4NTFROM om REQMMO 13801326 18,851 SYSTAMNffROVEM14TTIS- ALL CUSTOMERS SYShM-WmE REPLACE My REPLACEDEIE DIFRASTRUCNRE FACMm UNDERGROUND FACdITIES 12838460 (6,613) UISTALWTON OF P@FALL COMMERCW. N>FSQIINE SUETOE�ANSIGN Dec ENANCES-OIStALL DUE TOOUSTOBIDt DISM S, WITH OISTR®UTON FA GROWTH RE0.ffiURSEMEMFROM Fkom UESTOtG CUSTOMER 13870380 2,138 SYSIFM@fl•ROVEMENTS- ALL NSTOMERS GARLAND REPLACE IW RFPLACEDEIFRFAM D7FRASTAUCNRE UNDERGRD CdIT@S 1293174C 33,500 BTSTALLAnOKTON OF P@EAND RE30)ENTW. PFLUGID2VRLE I SYSTEMERWR Im APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUETOCUMSTOMER O7STALLm DISTR® ON GROWTH FACM=FORT@COMPANY 13 71G 8.113 MTALLATONOFPBRAND COM1AfER PLANO SYSIEMEXPANSION OW APPURTENANCES -INSTALL DUETOCUSIOMER DISMBI ON FACdRIES, WITH GROWTH PART W. REO.OI� F ROM REQUESMG Ll15fOMFR Page 9 M 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 10 of 155 DEC OWOFuOBQIEixv DA7YPLACED PROJECE PLACED W GAS MGASIDR.TIY PROJRCI' UTWTYPI.. WSERWUOR CUSFONERS PLA m NIRtlBER COST RETIREDDU G2003 BENRFTTED LOCATION PURPOSEOFIKK= T SERVICE 13102736 9.7V RELOCATIONOFFACBMES- ALL CUSTOMERS DENTON RELOCATIONTOAVOM J. RELOCATEDISTRBJUNON CON£LICTW/PROPOSED ACB.RIESASARESULTOF PROJECT GOVERNMENTAL 131030]0 (158) WSTALLATION OF PIPE ANO REB)ENTW. DESOTO SYSTEM EXPANSION IED APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUETOCUSTOA4]t WSTALLEDDISMB® ON GROWIR FACB.TIIES FEt TBE COMPANY 1315526G 6{,200 WSTALLAMMUP@EAND REIDEN'ML LEAMIFR SYSTEM EXPANSION JW APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUETOCUSFOMER INSTALLEDDJBTR® ON GROWTH FACEIJTES FOR THE COMPANY 13155570 325,153 RML TIONOFFA=ES- ALL CUSTOMERS ROUND ROCX RELOCATIONTOAVOD3 AW REPLACE 6' PLASTIC POE 007018' CONFLICT W/PROPOSED PLASNCMEDUETO PROJECT 6OVERNA@NTAL REQMT 1316532G 25,300 WSTALLAMONOFPREAND RESB)ENTW. BRYAN SYSTEMEJO'mslm Oct APPURTENANCE -INSTALL DUETONSIOM1Ot DISMB® ON£ACMME4 GROWTH 13195380 (43) DISTALLATIONOFPTEAND REB)ENTLLL ROCRWALL SYSTEMS "SION Feb APPURTENANCE-NSTALL DUETOCUSTOMER DISTR MMfACB.TT@S OROWTN 13195560 (42) WSTAL nONOFPTEAND ROCXWALL SYSTEM EXPANSION Feb APPURTENANCE-DSSTALL DUETOC mmER DISMBUTIONFA=ES GROWTH 13222160 10,75/ RELOCATIONOFFAC ES. qLL CUSTMERS DENTON REIACATIONNAWM J. RELOCATEDISTRIBUTION CONFLICTW/PROPOSm FACIUTffSASAREIILTOF PROJECT GO�AL Rm= 1323834G 14,86 WSTALLATION OF PB AND RESH)ENTIAI. SBAGOVELR SYSTFMEXPANSlm Da APPURTENANCE -DEVELOPER DUETONSTOb1ER WSTA DISMB® ON GROWTH FACBREF FOR 7103 COMPANY 13255170 (4,006) DJSTALLATIONUPIPEAND RESmENF1AL DALLAS SYSTEMEXPANSION IED APPURTENANCE-WSTALL DUETOCUSTONffR DIST UDMFACBJJffi GROWTH 13275320 16;M3 REE3CATNJN GF FAM=S- ALL NSTOMERS PLANO ROACATIONTOAWW Mq RELOCATEDISTRIBUIION CONI =W/PROPOSED FACB.=ASAREUI.TOF PROJECT GOVERNMENTAL IJET 13316846 40$00 NSTALLA110NOFPH'EAND HESM TUV. GEORGETOWN SYSh EXPANSION IW APPURTENANCE-DEVE1.oPE DUETOCUSTONJD[ MTALLED DISFRB3UTION GROWTH FACB.IDESFOR3 COMPANY 13383316 6,284 RELOCATION OF FACB.NTES- ALL CUSTOMERS FORT WORTH RELOCATION TO AVOB) t)a REPLACEWPLASTIC DUETO CONFECTWIMMSED RECONSMUCRONOFROADS PROJECT 13397790 19,473 MTALLATIONOFPWE RESIDENCIAL COLLEGE SYSTPM E%PANSION JW APPURTEtJANCE3-DJSTALI. STATION DUETOCUSTOMER DISTRI =U FACBTTES GROWTH U4m4 9;600 RFIOCATIDNOFFAMIDES- ALL CUSTOMERS DENTON RECO MDNTOAVOM Jm RELOCATEDISMB JFION CONFLICT WI PRW FACD-I SASAREULTOF PROJECT GOVERNAIDTTAL UET 13434636 3,119 MSTALLATIONOFPD'E AND COMbffiRCIAL WACG SYSIE3AEXPA mm Feb APPURTENANCE-BJSTALL DUEMO STObffR DISMB TIONFACB.PTIF . WTM GROWJN PART REH.H3IRLSFOgtBTFROM RE IJEST WsmF 13468966 3,900 DJSTALLATIONOFPJPEAI03 REIDENOAL DENTON SYSTEM EXPANSION Oct APPURTENANCE -DEVELOPER DUE TO CUSWWR H4 DLSTRIBU GROW[H FAMCBI'f MES IES FOR THE COOMPW ANY Page 10 of 155 • C, J C� ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2DO3 Page 11 of 155 ESCRIPFI NOF MWU I La DATE PEICFD PRORCFSP CED N GAS w OAS ]IrnrrY PROTECT I1TH.1'1'YPIANTNSGm OR NSRMERS Pm"u COSI REAMCN URNGDIN RENEFITEU IACATON PURPOSEOP PROTECT sERWC¢ U49O 1348J99G (7,111) NSTALLATON OF PPTA NMH.FIlCLIL LEWISVRIE SVSTEMEXPANSION Mar APPURTINANCES-DiSfALL DUE RNSRAD3R DI$'Iit®IJ}ION FACdom WRH GROWFH RER.D3U FROM GWS UESnONNSRMER 1352ll8G 69,182 RELOCATONOFFBMONE4- ALL NSIORPR.S DRYAN RELO A Feb RPlOCATEDISTRIEUTON =W/m CONFLICF W/PROPOSm FACD.ITESASARESULTOF PROJECF FRGHWAY 1353M9O (1j00) ICNNSIRULTION NSTALLATON OF PPE Aim RESmENML DAI.I,A9 SYS'IEMERPANS Jm DUERDUSRMMR Ht DISMBENANCES-WStALL DISTRmVRON FACDJTPS, WFIH GROWTH REQ.IDURSFMEN'FFROM RE UESTNO CUSIORIE0. 13996886 530,176 RELOCATONOFFACD.RPS- ALL NSRMERS FORT WORTH REIOCATONRAVOm Mm RELOCATED1STRmUTON COR -PLIC! W/PROPOSED FAC6RP SUET OF PROJECT HIGT W REWN OND 140m350 (34,200) =N F PIM WSTALLATION OF PIM AND RFSmENI1AL TAnWt STSTFb1ERPANS Feb APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUE TOCUSFOMER INSTALLEDDISTRIRU GROWTH D FACdFFPS FOR THENWRPANY 11018MG 1j57 1NSTALLATONO-D AND RESmINDAI. GRANDPRADUE SYSIEMEXPANSION Mu APPURTENANCES-DEVELDPFR DUE TONSFORIER NSTALLEDT U ORO WDI FACdF11F_S FOKFOR TD3 NWMPANY 0 1/058600 3,886 SYSTEM OPROVEMENT$- COMMFRCW, FORNEY SYSIEIAEKPANSION IW RELOCA3H MHFER DILE TONSFORIER APPROXDdATFLY]]OOFE GROWTl CE CONVFRT4'PLASTIC SERVICE LNE TOMAN.WFIHPARTAL REOrIDURSFA¢NTFAOM 1406726 60D NSTALLATON OF PPEAND RESmENML R011NDROCS SYSTEM E%PANMON Aug APPURTENANCE$ -DEVELOPER DUERNSRM]t wSTALLEDDISTR® OROWTS FACD.TTPS FOR THE WWMPANY 1406736 59,406 NSTALLATON OFPEBAND RESmENTAL ROUND ROCK SnTFMEKPANSION Why APPURTET4ANCE4-DEVELOPER DIIETS wSTALLEDDISIR®UTON GROWTH FACR.RIFS FOR TI@ COMPANY 14125510 60,851 NSTALLATON OF PP ALL NSRMFRS TAYLOR ERPANSION Dec APPURTENANCES-DEVFT.OPER O DUETODUERCUSRMER NSTALLEDT U GRO WTH FACR.tlfCOMPANY OW FORTI$TON 14138586 (tl,100) NSTALLAFOR OF PPEAND D40USTRIAL DPW REGIONAL WY APPURFENANCESCPH%LL3,400 ADPORi DMTOEXPANSION DUERNSTORff.R FEETOF 6' PLASTIC PPE, WITH GROWTH REQ.ffiIIRSEbPNF FROM UEAnONNSTOMER 111MSOG 2M,001 RELOCATEIO'S ACO.TIIE4- ALL NSi0RPE5 DFW REGIONAL RELO=WIM Fd RELOCATE ID' STID.PPE DUER ARPOAT CONFI,ICPW/PROPOSFD PDMD ATERMNAL PROTECT ONMU CONSTRUCTION 14153186 1,516,066 RELOCATON OF FACm1TPS- ALL NSRM1PRS FRESCO RFJACATONRAVOm Jm RFLOCATED6TR®U1TON CONFLICT WYPROPOSED FACO.ITPSAS ULTOF PROIF.CT S NIO81 W AY RECONSTRUCTION 14166616 143$3/ NSTAM.ATON OF PPE AND RPSmENTAl FORTWORTH SVST PJPANSION lm APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER OUE TO S RIER NSTALLEDDIION GRO GROW[H FA W.Ff 1ES FORRTHE COCORPANY 14389496 70,266 RELO ALL NSREPRS DEMON lm MMN 12'FFACFTD lY SPEEL PPE DUE TO CONFLIR W/PROPOSED STREET RECONSTIWCTON STMETM JRELOnONTOAWM PROJECT Page 11 of 155 • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIAB WTY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 12 Of 155 DESCHUMUNOFCOMLETED DATE KAM PR03ECT6 PIACED U9 GAS W GASUlR1TV PROJECT UTH.RP PLA" W SERVICE OR CU5T081FA8 PWMW NU m COST REIIDEDDURU4G20W HENEFTED LOCATION PURPO.SEOFPROJECT SERVICE 14391590 2,M MTALLATON OF P@E ANO RFSmE24TNL WATAUGA SYSTEMMANSION AX ANURTENANCE4-DEVELOPER DUETOCUSTOMER WSTALLED9,166FEETOFP GROWTH PLASTIC ME AND 2,998 FEEF OF I-PLASTICMEFORTHE 1"3MG n2 42 SYSTEM WROV£l.ffiNTS- ALLCUSTOMRS SANGER REPLACE Oct RFPLACEDEIERIORATM DIFRASIRUCTURE UMMGROUNDFAMIMS 1"39800 (148,851) RELOCATIONOFFACH,U - ALL C11S706@R.3 DALLAS RELOCATIONTOAVOM mu RELOCATEDUOO BUMON CONFLICT W/ PROPOSED FAMOUMASAIBSULTOF PROIECF STREET RECONSTRUCTION 1"39800 148,841 RELOCATION OF FACH.ITIES- ALL CUSTOMERS GARLAND RELOCATION TO AVOID M, RFLOCAn D35TRe3UT1ON CONFLICTWIPROPOSED FACHII@SASARESIR.TOF PROBCT STREETRECONSTRUMON 144421&3 ;163,998 RELOCATION OF FACH.TBS- A1.LCUSTOMER3 FORTWORTH RFAOCATONTOAVOH3 Sep RELOCATE DISTRBUTION CONFLICTWIPROP FACD.IT@9 AS A RESULT OF PROBCT STREET I=DNSTRUCITON 1"56690 BB WSTAI3ATIONOFP@EAM CG64+IDI GARLAND SYSTEMMANSION JW APIS/RTTWANCES-DEVELOPER DUETOCUSTOMER WSTALLFD DL4TR®ITHON GROWTH FACO.TBS FOR T TECOMANY 14469480 ojm WSTALLATIONOFP@EAND 003Mf0t F w SYSTEMS ANSION Apr APPURTENANCES- WSTALL DUETOCUST0I.BR DISTRBUTION FACU.ITIFS, WUH GROWTH PARTLU. RENBURSENID£T FROM REQUESTWO CtISTO6BR 1"9880 1,336 WSTALLATION OF PUT AND COEID7E cI GARLATD) SYSTFMERPAN&ON lW APPURTENANCES -P MASEOF DUETOCUSTOABR MTAL DISTRBUTTON GROWTH FACH3TE 1"86656 (6188) WSTALLATONOFP@EAM RESH3EMIAL DALLAS SYSTEM ANSION lm APPURTENANCES-WSTALL DUETOCUST DISIRBUTONFACH OM, WTH GROWTH RED.BURSEMENTFROM RE TESTING CI1STO 1"8673G (6,963) MTALLATION OF PTE ANO RE3H3ENTLll. DAILAS SYSTEM ANSION J. APPIBIENANCFS-NSTALL DUETOCUSTOMER DISTRBVIION FACdT@S, WCIH GROWTH REHdHI1RSEb¢NTFROM REQUESTD4G CUSTOMER 14500290 106,481 WSTALLATIONOFP@EAM RESmENT1AL KAM SYSTEMS/@ANSION lav APPIIRT DUETOOUSIDI.BR WSTAIt DMT[-DEVFIOPER GROWTH FACOWANY CU.T@S FOR FORT COIIB 14519860 14,949 RELOCATION OFFACD.ITIES- ALL CUSIOhmt3 BRYAN RELOCATION Feb WIPOAV00) CONFLICT W/PROPO4D FAMU.ASAI®IJTON FACH.IT@SASAREQMT PROTECT GOVERN6IONCF RE T 14534190 569 RFLOCATON OP FACU.1'I@S- ALL CUSTOAILR3 ARLWOTON ROA Jm FFLOCATEVUBTOMALN Crw/TOAVGD) CONFLICT W/PROPOSED PROTECT CONSTRBSOUETOI.IN.L CONSIRUCIION 1453"30 (6,913) OF P@EAND RE4mF.M1AL ➢ALLAS SYSIFMEJ@ANSHON J. APPURTATON AlP DUETOOUSTOMER DISTRB UTANCFS-WSTALL ACMEA GROWTH 1453W3G 2,451 T[ON WSTAILATONOF P@SAND RESWINi1AI. MCKDIFBY SYSTFASEXPAN810N IID APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DIBTOOUSTOEIDt WSTALLFDDIRTIBUTION GROWTH FACH.T@S FOR TBCOMANY 145392]Tf 3,919 SYSTTM0.=UORANB- ALL CUSTOABPS PALESTNE REPLACE Apr RHPI.ACROUND WFRASIRUCTURE FAMUN UNDERGROUND PACU.IIIES 1/343380 (36,98) WSTALLATON OF PIPE AND RESmEMW. WACO SYITEOCUSTO ION Jm APTIUBU ANCES-WSTALL DUE TOOUSTOhBR DIIIRIRITION FACH,ITff_S GROWTH Page 12 Of 155 11 c • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 13 of 155 DESMIWION OF CO DATEPLACED PRO.IECR PLACED 0 GAS INOA53RWTY PROBECT OiIW'[Y PUNT IN SERVICE OR COSTUMERS P w N ER COSF Ati FB1ED DORDIG20Rl BENEFRED I TION PORPOSEOFPROIECF SERWM 14560160 47 WSTALLATION OF P@ AND RESIDENFIAL ARLINGTON SYSTFMEXPANSION ]m APPNRENANCES-DEVELOPER DOETOCOSTO WSTALLEDDLSTRBMON GROWTH FACB,ITJF_S FOR TRE COLWANY 14566740 00 MSTALLATTONOFPWEAND RESIDENTW. GEORGEJYJWN SYSTEM EXPANSION !m APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DOETOCOSFOADIt WSTALLEDDISTRIBMON GROWFH FA=IESFORTRECOMPANY 14SW57G 3,263 WSTA ATIONOFPR'EAiID RESIDENTIAL ORANDPRAGOE SYSTEM EXPANSION Mer APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUETOCUSTOMEK R43TALLEDWTRBOIION GROWTH FA=IESFORTI EC ANY 145797)G 8,744 RELOCATION OF FACB.RIFS- ALL CUSTOMERS DALLAS RE[, C MONTOAVOD lm RFIOCATEDLSDIBMON CONFLICFW/PROPOSED FA=SSASARESULTOF P0.0JECF ALLEY RFL1lNSI =ON 145SH80 92,952 WSTALLATIONOFP]YEAND RESIDENTW. GRAMPRARJE SYSTEM EXPANSION Oa APPURTENANCES-BISTALL DUETOCOSTO81F3t DTSTRO3UOONFACO mce GROWTH 14611066 58}00 INSTALLATIONOFPBEAND RESIDENTIAL BRUSITYCREEIL SYSTEM EXPANSION Mry APPURTENANCES -DE OPER DUETOCOSTObffh OISTAI EM DISI ON GROWER FACdI FOATHECOMPANY 14611310 7,590 INSTALLATTONOFPMEAND RESIDENTIAL WESTWORTH SYSTEM EXPANSION Aub APPURTENANCES -DE OFER VR3AGE DUETOCUSTOBffR WSTALLED300PEBTOF4' OROWTH PLASTIC PIPE 900 FEET OF 3- FLASTIC PDE, 4,M0 FEET OF T PLASIICPPE, AND 107 SERVICE LR4ESFOATHECOMPANY 14621690 1,853 RELOCAFAOO.TTIFS- ALL CUSTOMERS FLOWER RELOCAIIONTOAVOID Ott RELOCAMTEDISTDISTROJMON MOUND CONFLICf W/PROPOSED FACONSm DUE TO STREEF PROTEGE RECONSTAON 14629540 (33,529) OISTALLAHONON OF PRE AMS RFSIDENML PRISCO EXPANSION Nw APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUETO DUE TOCUSTOMER MSTALI3DISTRIBOTON GROWTH FAESUF FORECOMPANY CG3TI 469 13806 53,000 OISTALLAHON OFOF PIPE ANO ALL CUSTOMERS GRANDP� SYSEXPANSION Dec APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUETOMSTOIR MON Bi=[ESFORT GROWFH OW FACG3T@4 FOR THE COMPANY 14657890 3,453 INSTALLATION OF PIPE AND RESIDENTLLL CARROLLTON SYSTTOCOSTOSlON Mry DUETROWFI MER WSTALENANCERBD OLOPER INSTALLEDDIRTHECOON GROWTH FACR.IIIES FOR THE COMPANY 14659130 I= OF COMMERner. PARIS SYSIPM EXPANSION J. APPURLARON INSTALL APPURTENANCES-B45TALL DUE TOCUSSOMER D4STA®MONP GROWTH 14675940 891 FPIPEIE3 B35TALLATION OFPE ANO RFSIDENSLIL GARLAND SYSfIMEXPANSION Feb DUE TOOOSTOI.ffR MTALEDDISTI BOTIOOPER INSTA N GROWTH FOMECO FACO.IA FORMECOMPANY 1/682930 1,298,1/6 RELOCAHONOF All CUSTOM1>8eS XENNIDALE RELOCATIONTOAVOID On IB=0IN5- OCAI SARR3MON CONFLim0fii ROPOSED S A ACO.RffS PROTECT ECONSTULTOF GHWAT RNOFFAR 14694830 -RFFELIOSS (4,810) ]EIIN RELOCATEDISFFACO.RIES- ALL CUSTOM1B=RS ROCICWALL RELOC Jm RELOCATEDISTR3BMON W/P OPOSE3 CONFLIPROAP OPOSED AF ACD PROTECT' RS NSMOULTOP MON STR�f RECONOF 19695020 (1,160) P INSTALLATION OF PREAND RESIDENTIAL BECTON SYJETO XPANSTON lm APPOR FIOPER DUETOOUSTOMER 0A5 MDCOOBD GROWTH IEDD6TR®MON PACO.IT'IFS FOR THE COMPANY Page 13 of 155 • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 14 of 155 DMC ON OF COMPLE 0.11E P1A6D PROlEC15PLACED M GAS pDlp,lTy PROJECT UTTLTTYPLANTMSE WV OR CUSTOMERS PLAfiTp NUATBER COSF RETMEDDURMG20B BENEFITED 2.06:.ATTON PURPOSEOFPROJRCF 9ERWCE 19699130 2,568 MSTALLATIONOFPBEAND RESmENDAL GLENN HEIOHIE SYSTEM EXPANSION My APPURTENANCE -DEVELOPER DUETOCUSTONiBR MSTALLED DISTRIBUTION GROWTH FACDJTIESFORTHECOl11PANY 19699550 (8,984) MSTALLATION OF PO AND RESmENI]AL DAIJ.AS SYSTEM EXPANSION J. APPURTENANCES-MSTALL DUETOCUSTOM DIEHUBUITONFACRJTIFS GROWTH 14M710 148 MEPALLAMONOFPBEAND REBmENDAL FORT WORTH SYSTEM FJ "SIGN J. APPURTENANCE -DEVELOPS DUETOCUSFOMER MSTALLED DISIR®UDON GROWTH FACMOMFORTHECOMPANY 1470595G 5,M7 BY5FEMO.iPROVEMENTS- ALL CIISTOh PALESTINE REPLACE Apr REPLACE DE ORATED MFRASTAUCIURE UNDERGROUND FACPFIRS 14708820 20,000 MEFALLATION OF PO'E AND COMhP]i XPLFJM SYBTFM EXPANSION Dx APPURTENANCE-WSTALLED DUETOCUSTOME DISFAIBUTIONFACMU GROWTH 14]08950 3,764 WnT AHONOFP@E RESmFNF(AL MANW-D SYSTEM EXPANSION My APPURTENANCE-DEVETAPER DUETOCUSTOMER METALLED DISTRIBUTION GROWTH FACR.TDE FOR THE COMPANY 14]2043G 8,459 WSTAL nONOFPWE COMMERCIAL CARAOLLTON SYSTEM FSP MON Feb APPURTENANCE-DJSFALL DUETOCIISTOAIFLL DISDUBUTION FACPIT@. WI]H GROW PARM REO.mURSFAIEITT EOM RE GCUSTOMER 14R0190 6j>5 MSTALLATON OF PIPE AND COMI.RAtCW. FNVDtONS MTM EXPANSION Apr APPURIEN2.M DEVELOPER DUE TOOUSTOMER METALLED EFOF3' GRO WTH PLASRCPIPEFORTFORTHECOMPANY 19722660 6,189 MSTALLATION OF PO'EAND COMMECIAL SNERMAN SYSTEMEXPANSION JW APPU NCE-D95IALL DUE TOCUSFOMIR DISTRIBUTION FACD.1'IIPS GROWTH 14]26530 1373 ATION OFPDRAND REmENF1AL ARLO9GTON S VS'TPMEXPAN SION My APPUR APPURTIMANCE-DEVELOPER DUE TOOUSTOMER MSTALLEDB G0.0 WD1 PACG.FHFS FORFOR THE COMM COMPANY 14T5590G ij59 RELOCATIONORMUOITIE- ALL NSlOMERS PLANO D RFlOC=W/F J. RDlULT OPO CONFLIMW/PROPOSED FAMOTE FACPR@SASAREULTOF PROTECT' GOV RE 11E5T 1493]250 6,666 AnONFAL ALL CUSTOMERS SANANGELO RFIOCATIONTOAVOm J. WRL L455FEZFACD.IT@9- P5TAL1955 3•PLASTIC CONFLICT W/PROPOSED TOF PR'EASARPbULT OF PROTEGE COM1AffRCW.OEVELOPMFNi 14710520 1,393 MSTALLAT[ON OF POE AMS COMMERCW. NORTR SYETOCUPANSION AW APPU0.TENANCPAR S LL RRMLS DUETOOUSTONP]t METFDS. WRH PAFOR 10.LS GAOW]H REO®UR FOR UETTDONNSTOME om 14]4]800 R% RELOC ALL CII3TONffR3 ROIXWALL RELOCA AVOID Apr MDISFFACRLTIES- RELOCATEDISTRBUTION WI FR CONFLiCTW/PROPOSED FACPpiIE ASAREULT OP PROTECT COMSffRC1ALDEVEi.OP1. 14]4]910 21,006 D MSTALLATION OF POR:AND RFSIDEN'IIAL MCKWNEY SYSTFI6EXPAN510N Dec APPUR]IIIANCE-DEVELOPF38 DUE TOCUSFOMEA DTAU OOW FAWEFOKCOWN 1474fl 26,175 MTATON OFPR AND RFSIDENIJAL MCY3NNEY SYSTTOMSTOWR Da APPURTENANCE -DEVELOPER DUE TONSTOMER METALLED DISTRIBUHON GROWTH FAC FORlNE COI.IPANY 14]S011G 544,2M TI RELOCATION OF FACPI'IpS- ALL CUSIONiFA.4 DALLAS RELOCATIONTOAVOm Apr RHACATEI UTION CONFWCT W/PROPOSED FACG.FfIE3 ASAFEARESULTOF PROJECT ALLEY RECONSTRUCTION Page 14 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Pegg 15 of 165 DFSCRIPFION OFCOMPLETE DATB M.AM PROJECTS PLACED W GAS W GASBRR.STY pROFECf UTILTFYPLAWT SERWCEOR CUSTOMERS PL4NTW N1111®ER COSF RETWPJI DORWG EON BENEFQED LMATION PURPOSLOFPROTECT SERVICE 14753576 590,8)3 RELOCATONOFFAM]TEES- ALLCUSTOhmtS DEMON RELOCATYNMAVOW J. RELOCAMDLSIRIBUTION CONPI=W/PROPOSED FACD1TffSASARESULTOF PROTECT MGH W AY RECONSTRUCTION 147eWG 6.035 WSTALLAMMOFPPEAM COMNIDtC1AL FORTWORTH SYSTEM EXPANSION Feb APPURTENANCES-RW DUETOCUSTOMER DIS BUIIONFACdP .WITH olko R PARTIAL REO.ID� FROM RSQMuSGCUSTOSiSa 14%5WO 1,845 INSTALLATION OF PIPE AND D4DTTSTRIAL DFWREGIONAL SYSTEM EXPANSION LLr APPURTENANCES-➢EVELOPER A➢tPDRT DUETOCUST NEER ➢STA=DIS[RWUTION GROWTH A�S FGR THE COMPANY 1476MG 5,141 INSTALLATION OF ]ME AMI RESmIN111L TROPI3YCLUB STSTEMEXPANSION J. APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUETOCUSFOMER WSTALLEDDISTRIBURON GROWTH FACRITIFS FOR ME W WANT I4MM 49,587 RELO TKWOFFACOT!ffi- ALLCUSTOMER.S FORTWORTH RELOCATION W AVOID bfv RML ATEDISMB=ON mlFL W/PROPOSED FAC]=ESASARE TOF P oma STREET RECONSTRUC➢ON 147T746G 35,078 RELMATONOPFACI.iTFB- ALL CUSTOMERS DALLAS RFLOCATONTOAWM lu1 RELOCATEDISIIRWUDON CONFLICT WI PROPOSED FACT ESASARFSULTOF PROJECT SITBEET REWNSHBUCITON 14783836 145,639 STST II.OROYEMEMS- ALL CUSTOMERS XE MLE REPLACE Oct REPLACEDHFERIORATEDSTEFL INFRASTRUCHJRE PD'EWITHPLASTICPIPE 14783%0 895 WSTALLATONOPPMEAND RESmENTAl ARLINGTON SYSTEMEXPANSION Feb APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUETOCUSTOb1F38 WSTALLEDDISMBUTION GROWTH FAMMESFORT ECOWANY 14796870 3% D4STAI.LATION OF PME AND RESmENFLLL COLLEGE STSTTMEXPANSION Oct APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER STATION DMWCUSTONER MSTALLMDISTJBM0N GROWFH FAMn.FORMECOI.IPANY 16619300 W319 RPIOCATION OF FACI=SS- ALLCUSTOhWAS CARROLLTON RML ATONMAV W J. RFLOCATEDISTRIBUMON COTffLICI W/PROPOSm FACMGMSASARFSIILTOF PROTECT PAV WG AM1 DRAW AGEMO= IW986G (1.880) WSTALLATIONOFPWEAND ALL CUSTOMERS ARLPIGTON SYSTEM EXPANSION 1W APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUEMWSTob1E1t WSTALLM DMMBUTION GROWTT FAN.RIES FOR TIDE C0WANY 16659946 (14) RPLOCATONOFFACDATIFS- ALL WSTOMERS Imes RELOCATONTOAVOM J. RML ATEDISJR®UGON CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FAC ESASARESULTOF PROTECT STREEPRECON[STRUCIION 16660NG 9,560 WSTALLATONOFPPEAND RESmEM1Al BMTON SYSTEM EXPANSION Feb APPURTENANCES -INSTALL DIMMCUSTOMER DISTR®UIJON FAC6TOE5 GROWTH Im"880 1,688 WSTALLATGNOFP]7EAND WMMERCIAI. FORTWORTN SYSTEM EXPANSION Feb APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DIMMCUSTOMPS WSTALLED3.850FFET0F3• 0110 F PLASTIC PH E FORME COMPANY 16671386 8;153 RELOCATION OFFACB.FI'ES- ALL NSMIAERS DALLAS RELOCATIWMAWD Feb RELOCAMDISTREBMW WNFLICFWIPROPOSED FAOA ESASARESULTOF PROTECT PN VDIGANDDRAWAGE PROTECT 1"71M1.105WSTALIATON OF P@EAND RESmENT8A1. OARLMm SYSTEM EXPANSION J. APPURTENANCES-DEVIRAP9t DIRT TOCUSF01rffR INSTALLEDDIRT GROWTH 00W ANY FACRITATOR 16671856 1.094 FMEA INSTALLATON OF PeEAM1 RESmEMW. GARLAtm STSIEMIXPANSION J. DUE TOOUSTOMER WSTAITIIJANC6S-I 01.OPER INSTALLS O15TR®UIION GROWTH PACEITIES FORTHE WSBANY Pegg 15 of 165 11 • • ATMDS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 200.1 Page 18 of 165 DES CO TED M18 PIALTD PROJECTS PLACED IN GAS BIGASNNIY PRO.R.CT UITLITYPLAN SERWMOR NSFOMERS PI.OIT D9 NOJNER COSF RETIRED DU G 2 BENEFFFED LOCATION PURPOSEOFPR02ECF 58RWm 166mm (;5'N) AISFALLAnONoFPIPEAND CONAfrTt ISUeST SYSTEMEXPANSION JW APPIBiTI]UNCES-BJSTALL DUETONSMA DISTR B=NFACD.R6S, WIII[ GROWER PAKT W. RB0.5BURSFDffiTF FROM 16675310 -REQUESIDJGCUSTOhffR (4,067) SYSTEMIEIPROVFAffNIS- ALL CUSTOMERS MCGRE60R REPLACE J. REPLACE250F=OF4-BARB WFMSFRUCFUKE STEEL PIPE W 250 FEET OF V 166]8260 3jU DSTALLATION OF PM AND RFSIDENIW. COLLEYVB.I.E SYSTEMEfo'ANMON JW APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUETOCUSTOMER DISTALLED 7,109 FEEIOF P GRORTH PLABnc PIPEFORTHECOMPANY 1668m9G 4,147 WSTA TIONOFPIPEAND RESmENnAL GARLAND SYSTEM EXPANSION Nw APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DJETONSn1MET INSTALLED DISTKBBU M omO FACDJTJPSFORTBECONIPANY 16681430 2JU7 SYSTEM pIPROVFM@OS- ALLCUSTONiERS SRERMAN REPLACE J. REPLACEDEIHKIORATED INFRASTRUCNRE UNDERGROUND £ACB.ITBS IMMIG 21 DSTALLATIONOFPIPE N RFSmENTIAL KELLEK SYSIEMEXPANSION len APPURTENANCES-DEVELOPFR DUETOCUSIONID2 D35TALLFm3,523FTJfTOFV GROWTH PLASTIC PIPE L565=OF Y PLASTICPBR,11,219FEEFOF2- PL =PIPE,AND3,374FEEFOF R75' PL CPIPE FOR THE 166W58G 2.996 DSTALLAnm OF PIPE AND COMMERCGL PLANO SYSTEMEXPANSION leu APPURTENANCPS-DEVELOPER DIIETOCOSTOBffiR DIS2ALJJm DISTRJBU W GROIVFN FACWTIESFOR=COMPANY 16686616 790 INSTALLAnONOFPIPEAND RFSmEN11AL KELLFR SYSTEM EKFANSION ]m APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUETOCUSTOBffR DSTALLED2,n3FEEFOF2' omO FLAETTCPIFEA 713FEEIOF 0.75' PLASTIC PBT FOR THE lm 2,548 DISFA nwoFPIPEAND RFSIDF4TIAL Im.LER SYSTEMEXPMMON N. APPURTENANCES-DEVFLOPEK DIJETOCUSJOM1fr32 WSTALLED2,1WFUTOF3' GROWDI PLASTICPIPE, 3.750PETTOF2' PLASnCPUT,AND2A15FEETOF 0.75'PLASnCFBEF0Rn 1668880 3,166 WSTA VON OF PIPE AND KELLER SYSTEM EXPANSION Ott APPURTEI4ANCFS-DEVEIAPER DUE TO CUSTOb4T6 A'STALLFD2,561FEEFOF6' GROWD3 PLASnCPBT,330F OFV PLAS'JICPBT,1,850=OF 3- P nCPRT,L5461E OF2' PLASTICPIP$ Atm 1,594 FEEFOF 0.75' PLASTICPn FORTNE 16692240 11,529 B65TALLAUM OF PIPE AND RESIDENTIAL BENBROOK SYSTEM ES "MON My APPURTENANCES -DE PER DUETOCIJSTD NSTALLFm DSTRP3UTION GROWTH FACILFFIPS FOR THE COMPANY 16692520 1,919 WSTALLAMWOFPBTAND RESmF2nTAL SOUITLLAKE SYB EXPAN810N My APPIIRTENANCPS-DEVELOPER INJETOCUSTCMER DiSTALLED 6,160E of 2' GROWTH PLASnC PIPE FOR THE COEB'ANY 16692646 OX9 INSTALLAnO OFPIPEAND RF503ENML JOSINA SYSTEMW"MON On APPURTENANCES-DEVELOPPR DUETOCUSFONIER DSTALLFD DISTR03UDON GROWTH FA�FORTHECONIPANY 16694490 1,901 INSTALLAnO OF FGEAMJ KE9m104TW. FLOWER SYST£MEXPANSION J. APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER MOUND DUETOCUSNMER WSTA MDISTRIBU110N GROWER FACD.InFSFORTRECOMPANY Page 18 of 165 C� • 0 ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2OD3 Page 17 of 165 D�R@ON OF COWLBMV IMTRP m PROJCCTS PLACED M GAS WGASDTLLRT PROBCT IRMYFI MSERWI OR CURCOABRS PL6NTW NUABER COST RRTBEDDMNG2001 RENERTTED IACATJON PORPOSEOFPROJBCT SERVICE 16694580 14USI RELOCAnON OF FACRi - ALL CUS50MFRS DALLAS RELOGnONTOAVOM Ap REIACATEDISTR®UnON CONFl.ILT WIPROPOSED FACD.RNSASARESN.TOF PROTECF 51REEFRECONSIRUMON IM95M 290.452 RELOCAnONOFFACRdTNS- ALLOUSTOh DALLAS RELOCMONTOAVOID Ary RIIOCATEDMMHMON CONFLICT WIPROPo FACdITI MARESULTOF PRONCF ERiH W AY RECONSTRUCTION 16695500 221,665 REL MONOFFACBATNS- AI.LCUCFObNR,S FORTWORTH RELOCAnONTOAVOID My REfACATEDISTWBMON CONPLICFWIPROPOSED FACdnNSa ARESULTOF MO= STAEEF RECONS]RUMON 16696590 130,685 RELOGnON OF FACILITNS- ALLCUSTOI.NRS DALLAS RFLOGnONTOAVOID Aug RELOCAIEDI UTION CONHACFWIPROPOSED FACO.=ASAMMTOF PROTECT NIGW NNSBEMON 16698310W T ATIOMON OF PIPEAND RESIDENTIAL. 10].LHt SYSTEMEXPANSION Jm APPURTENANCES-DEVP3.OPER APFUR DUE TOOUSTOENIt WSTALLEDDISTRB OROWE FAFORHCOWA 16T0 1,131 R OnONOFFN CUSN Hb AOAVOID My MATEDSRBUTION OIaWIPROPOFD FAERAAETOF PROIECF BRIO ONCIINC110N 16710190 624 WSTALLAnAHON OF PIPE AND RFSIDENnAL GRAPEVD53 STSAN310N My APPURTENANCES-DEVFAOPER DUETOCUETOCOSTObNR WSTALLEDT GROWTH 0 FACDTf IPS FORFOR THENWbNANT 1671086G 1,064 INCi'ALLAHON OF PDTi Atm RESIDENTIAL ALI.F]l SYCITOCUnOWR J. APPUATEN PER DUE'G OUCTOb1ER DMC U UMON WSTALLEDFORT GROWTH OW FACB.I FOR THE NMPANY 16714630 366,853 RELOCAMDMMBUMONE5- n ALL CUSTObffRS DENTON RELOGHONTOAVOID 1W RELOGTEDISTR CONFLICT W/PROPOSED UUT FACR.ITIESASARESULT OF PROTECT IDOHWAYRECONSTRUMON 167153713 3,M5 WSTALUnON OF MD RESIDENTIAL SACHSE SYSTTOCUSTOMER Mu DUETOCUSTOb1ER INET EDDME5-DEVELOPER WSTALLEDDISTRIBHITON GROWTH FAC6ITN3 FOR nN COhNANY 16T1 M (17) RELOCAnON OF FACLLI - A CUVOMFRB DALLAS RFlOCAnONTOAVOID !m RELOGTEDJ U`OON CONFLICFWIPROPOSED FACTLRNSASARES TOF PROJECT STRFI:FRENNSTRUMON 16n7D00 1,]S6 WSTALLAMONOFPNEAND RESD3FNGL EULE33 SYSTEM ERPANSION JW APPURIENANCE9-DEVELOPER I DUETONCIOMPR MTALLED 1,567 FEEFOF 2' GROWTH PLASHC PNE FORTHE COMPANY I6T1345G 2,630 INSTALLAHON OF PNE AND RESIDENTNL ROCKWALL SY6TEMEXPANSION Im APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER ]JUETOCUC10hID6 WSTALLIDT MON GROWTH FACR.ITNS FORFOR 133E NMPANY 16TJ331G 4.30 SYSTEMIDNIMVFMET0 NbB.ODtCW. ROYSECFFY STSTANSION Feb UPDATEROYSECItt TOWN DUE TD TOCU NSIOMER PLANT OROWM 16R33ZG (5.470) ALL CUSTOMERS CAOMI Mn�c FORTNAPRO R Aub FORMp.NROVENENIS- FORSIFIG OFOFFSRE SYC5FAI UNROVf3..4I66t MAWS. WH EM1NII'f RS BYRE OCUSGCUSTOMER 1672589G 662 AHON OP PNEANO RESIDEN[W, CEDARPARK SYSTEMEXPANSION ov N. APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUE TOCUSLOMER W3TAW.EDDIRME GROWTH COON PEMPANY FACB.nNVON 16T1888G 1352 OF P WSTALLAnON OF PIPE MD RESIDEPIFUL DEMON SYSTTOEXPANSION lm APPURTENANCES. DEVELOPER DUE'GRO S MER DISMON GROWTH PWST FACD.RNS FOR THE NMPANY ACU FORM Page 17 of 165 • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 18 of 155 OF D B,L3ypypge FROMM PLACED W GAS m GASUX2 V PRO3ECf UTH.TTYPL ESSERVICEOR CUSTOMERS P RI NUMBER COST RETl] EDDURUIGS003 BENRFITY.D S AnON PURPOSEOFFACOEU SERVICE 16112170 1,030 WSTALLAnONOFPBEAND REmENTIAL DOOM SYSTIM EXPANSION Aub APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUETOCUSTOMER INSTALLEDDISTRBUIION GROWER FAM] 1EFORn8ECOMPANY 16)38003 (3) D35TAILAnON OF PIFE AND RESID N DFSOIO SYSTEMEXPANSION Jun APPURTENANCE-ENSTALL DUETOCUSTOMER pISTR®LHON PAC6IT�8, WI]N OROWIH REPBURSEMENI FROM 16740M in WSTALLAMON OF FB AND REmENnAL MANSFBLD SYSTEM EXPANSION Feb APPURTENANCE -DEVELOPER DUETOCUSTONBR WSTALLED DBTRBURON GROWTH FACD.nBSFORTHECOMPANY 1674MW 10,533 MSTALLAnONOPPBBANO RFSDEN'RAL POTESBORO SYSIEMEXPANSION Mry APPURTENANCE-WSTALL DUETOCUSTOM1 DISTRBUIIONFACRRBS. WITH OROW PABL LRE0.BURSEMEMPROM DEVELOPER 16745310 I,785 WSTAUATIONOFFIPEAND RESmENTIN. FORT WORTH SYS)PM EXPANSION Sep APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUETOCUSTOMER WTAL ESSTRBORON GROWTH FACD.ERES FOR THE COMPANY 16741243 3,186 DISTALLAnONOFPTEAbK) RFSmEN[LV. AUSTDT SYSTETS EXPANSION lm APPURTENANCE -DEVELOPER DUETOCUSEONBR WSTALLEDDISTRIBUDON GROWTH FACEITBS FOR nB COMPANY 1674030 231 RFLOCAnONOFFA(=BS- ALL CUSTObffR.S BVWO RELO ONTOAVOH) lW RFLOCATEDISTRBUTION CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FAC ESASARBSULTOF PROTECT STREERECONSTRUCOON 167MUG 90,613 ENSTALLAnON OF PUT AND REmENTTAL LA%ESIDE SYSTFMFXPANMON Afu APPURTENANCE-DISTALL DUETOCUSTO6 DIS7O BUOON FACD.IYIFS GROWPH 16750930 I",T74 RELOCAnON OF FAMMES- ALL CUSTONSPRS DALLAS REIACAnONTOAVOH) Aug RELOCATEDIST mow CONFMCPW/PROPOSED FACd1T3ESASARESULTOF PROJECT BGHWAYRECONSTRUCDON I6755MG ),ID RFLOCVOONOFFACB.RBS- ALL CUSIORBRS SAVOY REI.00AnMMAVOU) Fd RELOCATEDBTRBUTION CONFLICP W/PROPOSED FACE OESASARESULTOF PROJECT CpNABI3C W. DEVELOPMENT 16758606 314 RELOCATION OF FAMMES- ALL NSWWRS BUFFALO RI TIONTOAVOD Feb REIACATEDISIRBUOON CONFLICF WI PROPOSED FAMMESASAREULTOF PROJECT GOVERIABNTAL REQUEST 16758826 12,)58) WSTALLAnONOFFMAND OOMMFRC FRIECO SYSTEM EXPANSION Ape APPURTENANCE-B45TALL DUETOCUSIQ3.433 ESTRBUy ONFACO. WRH GROWTH REDBURSFAHIli FRWrt RE OEnONOUSFOMER 16)59560 920,)82 RELOC ALLCUSlOMERS DALLAS RELOCA Aug TEDISFFACEON REMMESDISfR W/POAVOD CONFWCF3WPROPOSED ESULT FAVD43 ESASAREUOEPR PROTEGE PAVDJJANDN PROTEGE 16)61500 1,)01 OF PEE AFDCOMMERCLV, BJSTALLATION OF MARANK SYSTEM EXPANSION May -MS APPURTENANCE FALL DIB TOOUSFOMER FACU.ITIFS. WITH GROWTH PAKR R PARTIES. FROM GCUSR.SFAO]Tf nAFRO ME 16)6)330 12,3)9 B.IPROVEMENJS- ALLCIISFOMERS MARBLEFALLS FORTIWROVE Ape FORTDTCATIONOF OFTSIIE FORM SYSTEM D.BROVEMENP WITH PARTIAL RMIB. RED.AUAnONOPBY I6M)35G 10,819 WStALLATION OP FIVE AND COM1O.ffRC1AL MARBLE FAILS SYSIFMEXPANSION Apr A[STRES NANCE-DJ DUE'FOClIS50NBR ES DISTRBUI30N FACB.ITIFS GROW[H Page 18 of 155 Ca • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 19 of 166 D ON OF MRIPLE D DATEPWCFD PRO2ECIE PLACED IN GAS W GASDTBITY PRO2F.CT UTHATY PUNT W SERVICE OR CII 0BURS P m WRIBER COSf RETTRF-D D11RD9G M BENEFIlED LOCATION PURPOSEOFPRO.IF-CP 9E WE 167837BG 2,419 WSTALLAHONOFPPEA2m RESME SAMM SYSTEMDPANSION len APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUETOCUSTObfrlt INSTALLED DLS]RBU ON GROWTH FACO SFORTf3PCOAPANY 16783930 811 WSTALLATIONOFPtPE RESmEN[W. MA E SYSTEMS "SIGN lm APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUETOMSTOMER WSTALLEDDISTRIBUHON GROWTH FACO.ITIESFORTHEWWME 167087G (551) WSDLLAHON OF PPE AND RE4mINllAL SACHSE SYSTEMEXPANSION Nw MPURTENANCES-DEVEA DUENCUSTONIFR WSTALLED DMTRJH HO GROWTH FACILITIES FOR THE COMEANY 16783940 3.672 WSTALLATION OF PPE AND RESWEN ENVBtONS SYSTEM EXPANSION AN MPIJRTENANCES-DEVELOPER DUETONSTOAfE18 WSTA MDLSTUDU ON GROWTH FACB.RIESFORTHECOWP 16785OG 593 WSTALI MT OFPPEAtm COhWP]tCLV. TEMELE SYSIEMEXP"Mm Aug APPURTENANCES -INSTALL DUETOCUSTORIER DI8IRDJUHON FACR,Ii1FS GROWTH 16795 G 1,031 WSTALLAHONOFPPEAMI RESmE DE61'TON SYSTEM EK "%N J. APPURTENANANCES-DEVELOPER DUETOMSTOWR WSTALLEDDISTRB ON GROWTH FACB.ITPSFORTHECOWP 167MBG 21,520 SYSTEM B,PROVEMENTS- ALL CUSTOMERS SNEJUMN REPLACE JW RFPLACEDE ORATED WFRASDUCIIIRE IINDEIeGRW FACB.RPS 16796610 4.Wl WSTALLAHON OF PPE Atm COFDdfRCVL WMIE SYSTENE "SIGN Mer MPIIRTENANCFS-WSTML SEl'II.FA®l[ DUETOCUSIOLff.R DISTRWUHONFAW.D .WITH GROWTH PARTW.M@ BURSHI.ENTFROM UESTWaC smdEt 16796800 45,759 RELOCAHONOFFACWITPS- ALL CUSTOMERS DENTON RELOCATION TO AVOM lW RELOCATEDln BMM CONFLICL W/PROPOS® FACD mFS AS A RESULT OF PROTECT' COMSIERCW. DEVELOPM 1679712G 2,453 WSTALLATION OF PPE -AND RESmFITIW. FORNEY SYSTEM EKP MON Feb APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUE'IL3CUSTOMER WSTALLM5,Tl4FEET01`2' GROWD3 PLASHCPPE, I,PM FEETOF 3' PLASHC ME,;6V FEET OF 0.75' PLASHC PPE. Atm 2,431 Mn OF 4'PLASrm PPEFORTHE 16800860 689 INSTALLATIONOf PPE AND B USDUAL BENBl=K SYSTEM EXPANSION Feb MPURTENANCES-DEVELOPER DUETOCUSTORPR WSTALLMDISTRWUTION GROWD3 FACBdI MRTHECOMPANY 16803RG JAB COMbIDeCW. FRESCO SYSTEbf EXPANSOw MPURTFNANCES-INST DUE TONSTOMFA IMSTALLAT[ONOFPM= DLSTRIBUTION FACEITPS, WITH GROWTH PARTLLLRED.®URSEMENTFl m RE UESTDIG CUSTO 16MUG 496 RE TIONOFFACBJTPS- ALL CUSTOMERS DWAY RELOCAHONTOAVOM J. IPTACATEDMTRIB HO CONFLICTW/PROPOSID FACO.ITPSASARESULTOF PROJECT STRPEI'RECONSTRUCIION 16506260 4.539 WSTALLAMWO PPEAMI CONOffRC PLANO SYSTEM EXPANSION APr APPURTENANCES-INSTML DUSMMSTOh DISTRIBUHON FACR.0 .WITH GROWTH ?Mi RED-1R11RSE FROM UESTWG CUSiOMFR 16806336 48 RELOCATIONOFFACMJ - ALL CUSTOMERS COLLEGE RELOUHON TOAVOm JW RELOCATE DISIRIBVCION STATION CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FACDJTPSASAMMTOP PROJECT COMbPR DEVELOPMENT Page 19 of 166 • • 11 ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 20 of 155 0 (M OF UM wm PLACED PROJECTS PWCED W GAS W GASOTII.RY PROJECT UTn.nYPIANPWSERVICEOR CUSTOMERS PWNIW NUMBER COSI REIDBF,DMJRMG2003 BENEFITED I.OB:ATION PBRPOSEOFPRO3ECT SERVICE 16 50 324 INKL TIONOFP@EAND CONEMER EULFSS sysmi EXPANSION FW APPURTENANCES-WSTALL DUETOCIISTOMER D15TRO (W FACILIT .WITH GROWTH PART RE4.ID11RSEMENTFROM GNS OMER 16810236 2,903 INSTALLATION OF PIPE AND REmENnAL HEATH SYSTEM EXPANSION AW APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUETONS WER WSTALLED5,WBFEETOFY GROWTH MMT[CPW 753 FEEL OF O.T5' PLASnC PEE, AND 681 FEEL OF 9' nwsnc PIeE FOR THE COMPANY 168116ZG 10,561 WSTALLATION OFPE COMBffRCW. CLFHURNE sYSTPMEXPANSION ad APPURTENANCE-PURmCHASE OF DIB:iONSTOIHER WSTALLID DISTR®UTION OROWIH FACO.ITTFS 16822396 9,723 WSTALLATION OF PIPE AND COMMERCW. DALLAS SYSTEM} MSKM MY APPURTENANCES-Ol5[ALt DILEMCUMMER DISIR =(MFACRATIE.WRH GROWTH PARTIALREINIB ffi.ffiNTFHOM RE IIETINO CIISTObtrR 16822796 20,253 RML T[ONGFFACdITR?F- ALL NSIObffRS WACO ROACAnmN AVOm Fa RELOCATEDMs UTION CONFMCTW/PROPOSED FAMITTESASARESULTOF PROJECT STREET UE WsTRUCITON 16525666 1,052 WSTALLATI(NOFPWEAND REmFM1AL ROW = SYSTEMEXPANSIGN AW APPURTENANCES-DEVp.GPER MMTONSmbiF38 WSTALLFDDiSTR®IITION GROWTH FACB.InE4 FOR T61E COMPANY R23TA n(NOFPHEAND 1682)516 2m REmFNTIAL HNBST SYSTEMB%P"mw J. APPURTENANCE -DEVELOPER DUETONSYOMER WSTALL1031,092FEETOP2- GROWTH PLASnc PR'E FOR THE COMPANY 16831956 1,995 WSTALLATION OF PIPEAND COMbf©BCIAL DFWREGIONAL SYSTEM EXPANSION Oct APPURTENANCES-WSTALL 26D AEIPORT DUETONSTOMER FEETOF2'PLA =MEP GROWn1 REOIR.ATORSTATION,AND M618R, WDR PAR REOVDI3RSETONTFOR IUM136 4.Sn WSTA TK)NOFPIPO AND REmINIIAL DENION SYSTELJEXPANSIGN mq APPURTENANCE-DEVEIAPER DIRiTONSTONffR WSTALLm DISTRIBUTION GROWTH FACRLT65 FOR THECOMPANY 16851690 3,805 SYSTEMThO'ROVEbfr2f15- ALLCUSTOMERS DENTON REPLACE MW REPLACE DETERIORATED 1NFRASTRUC UNDEKGROUNDFACLLITIES 16855)10 Tin RISTALLAnmoFPR'EAND COME cR TERRELL SYSTEtd EXPANSION Jm APPURTENANCES - WSTALL DUHYO CUsTOMFR DISTRIBUTION FACRJ. WITH GROWTH PARTLLLRFASBIIRBm FROM lRBQMSTWGMWMER 16860010 23}18 SYSTEMD ROVELfrM3- AG.NSTOb HOWE REPLACE lm REPLACE DETERIORATED piFR,LSTItUCIIRUi UNDFRGROW3 FACB.ITIFS 16860510 9,0% WSTALLATION OF PO'E AND NNA1flfCWL KFRRVB.LE SYSTEM F]@ANSION Mer APPURTENANCES- WRTALL DUETONS'fO DLSTR6 =NFACR.nNS. WITH 0110 I PART W. REIFiBURSESR]9T FROM UESTW'O NSTOLWR 16861210 4.161 MSTALLATKMCFPWEAND RESmEHTLLL DESOTO SYST45E%PANSION Feb APPIRITQIANCE-DEVELOPER OI MCUSTO BISYALLFDDInRR1 ON 6RDWTH FACWnOS FORTHEcOMPANY 16863766 11j23 WSTA TKWOFMEAND ALL NSTOMERS ROUND ROCK FORTffIGTION OR Jm APPURTENANCE-MnT L SYSTEM NBPROVEMENT REG TORSTATION,360FEET OFY WSIEELFIP&ANDM00 EEETOFWFLA mc� ----: Page 20 of 155 • C' ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF RUNG PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 21 of 155 ON OFC DAIS PWC PRQIECTS PLACED IN GAS MGA9NWTY PBOIEC[ Ol"RIFYPL4NTAI SERVICE OR CUSFOMERR vLANTIN NM®ER COSI RETIREDDIHIMG20W BENEPI'IT.D LOCATON PUBP08E OF PROJECT' SERVICE 168]15]6 11358 SYSTEM POROVEBIEJTIS- ALL CUSTOMERS CLDTON REPLACE Feb REPLACEf W FEEF OF Y BARE WFRASIRUC111RE STEEL POE WTTR 800 FEET3' 168M4W 200 MSTALL MMOFPOEAND RESIDENTIAL XELLER SYSTIIdF "SIGN J. APPURTIMANCES-DEVELOPER DUETOCUroO MSTALLEDDISTRIBUIJON GROWTH ACdTTIE4 FOR TITS COMPANY 1688099E TIO MSTALLATIW OF POT AND RESIDENTIAL NORW SYSTEM pOAN w Feb APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER RICJdAND DUETOCUSTOMER MSTALLEDI,)]2FELT0F2' HB.LS GROWTH PLASHCPOEFORTHECOWP 1689 M 3,151 REI.00ATIDNOFFACR.UIES- ALL CUSTOMERS CmMMT RELOCATIONTOAVOID Oh RELOCATEDISMBIRON CONFLICTWIPROPOSED FACD.ITOBASARE9ULTOF PROTECT STRFETRFGONSI =lm 168MIG '10.689 RELOCATION OF FACO.TTIE3 RELOCATION W AVOID FW RMA MDIST WEON CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FACD.ITIPS AS ARFSULT OF PROJECT SIREETREWNSTRU=W 1689764E 28,691 RELOCAHONOFFACB.TTOS- ALL CUSTOFIEFS FORTWORTN RPLOGTIONTOAVOID Jm RELOCATEDIS]HIBUHON WNFLICT WIPROPOSED FAC6RGSASARESULTOF PROJEC[ STREET REWNSTRUCIION 1699NIG 5,69] MSTALLATIONOFPOEAND COMb1Eli WAW SYSTFM1 "SIGN Du APPURTENANCPS-INSTALL DUETOWSiU DISMB® ONFACd .WTM GROWTH PARTLtl REB.iBJJRSESff t.Tmom WSTOMER 16NIM 3,1% RELOCATION OF FACBJTOS- ALL CUSTOMERS CISCO RELOCATION TO AWO FW RELOCATEDISIWBUDON CONFWCFWIPROPOSED FAW.TIIESASARESULTOF PROJECT DRAINAGE DITCR CONSTRUCDON lomC 21 MSTAIJ.ATIONOFPOBAND RESIDENTIAL ARLINGTON SYSTEM EXPANSION J. APPURTENANCES-DEVELOPFJT DUETOCUSTOSOR IMTA EDDISIRIBWEON GROWTH FACdO'O'SFORT WMPANY 16907636 11,83 WSTALLATIONOFPOEAND COMMERCW. Aub APPURTENANCES -INSTALL LOW DUETOCUSTOMER FEETOF4"PLASTICPOF.6FEET GROWTR OF B' PLASTIC POE, ANO 2]0 FEET OF 2• PLASTIC POE. WTIH PARTW. RBMIDURSEMFM PROM RE UESJDIG CUSTOMER 16908100 1,083 INSTALLATION O£E W6O.fERC1A1. OpHIWd SYSTEMEXPANSION Aq APPURTA L DUE TOQJSTOM1ffR FA9-MSTWM WSTR®WIUTIONFCdlJ05, WIIR GROWM PART W. RE PIDURSFb1EN1' FROM CUSTOMER 1690956E 4,6T1 INSTALLATION OFPIPE AND RESIDENILV. GRANDPRABUE NSION Maz APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DSYSTTOCU UETOCIJSTONIFR INSTALLm OLSTR®U GROW[H FACBITOSFORTREWWMPANY 16911/7G R DJSTALLATION OF POE AND RESIDENTIAL BRYAN SYSTEME%PANSION Feb APPURTENANCES-DEVFIOPER DUETOWSTOJ.ffR INSTAL RIBUHON GROWTH OR FACdROS FFOR TIB! COMPANY 16912476 607 MSTALLAHON OF PO COMMERCW. SYSTEMEXPANSION Im O APPURTENANC=OFFIOPER STATION mnoN DUE TO NSTOM1ffR MS 4' GROWTH CPWE00FE IW PLASHCP@E AND 100 FEEW PLASDCPOEFOF WMPANY 169221)6 3,STJ INSTALLATION OF PIPEAIBD RESIDENTIAL. EP].LER BYSIFMERPANSION Dec APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUE TOWSTO.AffR INSTALLED 1,23 FEET OF 2" GROWTH PLASTIC POE, 2,M3 FEET OF 3' PLASOC POE, AND 3,566 FEET OF 4•PLASHC POEFOR THE Page 21 of 155 • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS REUTABIUTY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 22 of 155 DESCRUMONOFcowum IATEFIAC® PROJECEPLACEDINGAS MGASDIR.TIY PROSECT 21TR.TTYPLANTNSERWCEOR CUSTOMERS PLANTDI NUMBER COST RERRBDDURIN'GM BENEFT2ED IACATTON PORFOSEOFFROJECT SERVICE 16925730 21,160 RELOCATJONOFFACRFT1bS- qLL CUSTOMERS SNERMAN RELOCATION TO AVOID J. RELOCATEDMTUBUTION NNFLICTW/PROPOSED FACBET@SASARESN.TOF PR mD LTJMA@R DEVFLOPMOJT 169M03G 5,510 WSTALLATONOFP@EAM NFAffA MCRDJNEY SYSTFDI EXPANSION J. APPURTENANCES-BJSTALL DUETONSfOME11 DISUUBUTION FACRIT@9, WTTS GROWTH PARTW REPIBURSFTDNTFROM REQUESTNG CUSTOMER 16926470 ]I OF PPE AND MMENTIAL NORTH SYSTOA EXPANSION De APPURTENANCE -DEVELOPER MI AND DUETOCUno R �NSTALLATION INSTALLED602FEETOF2- BILLS GROWTH FI.A BRAND 840 FETTOF 0. ]S nPLASASTIC P@E FOR THE 169285]0 48,509 INSTALLATION OFP@EAND ALL NSTOhIDt3 KP7rn EORTIFlCAHONOR IW S MTALL 3,521 SYEMO FEET0F6'FLASTICMEAD 2084 FEET OF8'FMECPPE 14.4M16930HG ,4H INSTALLATION OF ME AM BIDIIST1UAt 6RAPEVWE SYSTOAEXPANSION 9sp AFPURTENANCE-PNBCHASE OF TO DUETOMER 5, 800TEETOFINSTALLEDb' OW GROWTH PLASTICPIPE 1b93115G (618) RELOCATION OF FAC6II@S- ALL NSTOhffRS FORT WORTH ROICTJONTOAVOID Mu RFLOCATEDISUIION CONMfLICI W/PROPOSBD FACB.IT@S ASARETILTOF PROTECT STREETRECONSIRUCTON 16931690 135,413 RELOCATIONOFFBUTIONFS- ALL CUSIOR@RS PLANO RELOCATw/mo OID ]m RO.OGTEDISTRH3UIION NNFLIPR W/PROPOSED FAASARESULTOF PRO= TREET S4STAI RECON 169349%0 3,TJ2 OF PJSTALLATION OF P@E AND DENNH SVSfEM EXPANON IW APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUETOOUSTOMER N'STALLEDDIST GROWTH M fACBETIE FOR TNMCONWEIPANY 16938950 28,500 DiSTALLI4" OFPB'MAIJD COM1AffJtCW. WATAUGA SYSTFMEXPANSION Oec APPURTENANCE-PUROHASEOF DUE SOOUST LED DISTR®UTON GROWTH FACT @S FACM 16942660 263 D35TALLATION OFME AND REIDINTW. FORT WORTH SYSE EXPANSION JW APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER TO DUETO A'STALLE BUTIONEMW GROWTH FORT FACB.I FORTfINNMPANY 16942]30 168 A INBTALLAHON RESIDENTIAL FORT WORTH SUETOEXPANSION fm -DEVEL 1 APPIAR OPER DUETROWTOME EDNCEBUT[O 1NSTALLEDDISIRIECO N GROWTH FACBET@SFORTHECOA@ANY 06943110 450 PoSTAILAHON OF PPE AND RESIDENML SOUII3LAKE SYSTMMEXPANSTON JW APPURTENANCE -DEVELOPER DUE TOCUBTOhffR D5 8EOE Y GRWTH LMCMEFORHCO@ANY 1643370 86 PSTATIONOFPEAN RE0ENML LANCASTER SYSTEETEIPANSIDN Jm APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUET @ NSTAD UTION GROWTH FACBSFORTHEO@AN 169M830 2,756 RIIOCAHON OF FACB.1'IiF_S- ALL CIJSTOlAERS IXVING NE[.00AHONTOAVOID M< RELOCA]EDISIAH3UTION CONFLIC[ W/PROPoS® FACBJIIESAS UU PROTECT SIAEET RENNSTRON 169HBHi 2M MEON DISTALLAiION OFOF PH4 AND NMMECWL MCKBJIffY SYSTEME%PANSION leu E-D35TALL DUETROWU4 IDt DISTRIBUTION FACB.T@S, WTH DISTRIBUTION GROWTH PARTLU. RE0.IDURSFT.f ENI' FROM GCUS 1694964663.M H4STALLATJONOPP@E AMEA ND RESIDENMt GRANDPRAIXIE IJec APPURTENANCE -DEVELOPER DUET IDt UISTALLED BTUBUT[ONDUEMMEXPANOON GROWTH ROWT14 FACdTf IES FOR l'HE NMPANY ORTHECQW Page 22 of 155 G • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 23 Df 155 DE6CRRF1 NOFNMPLETED MTE PJACTD PROJECTS PIA MGRS WGASUS PROJECF UTWTYPL TWSERWI OR NSFOMERS PL . NUMBER COSF RETIRED DURING 2003 BENEFITED LOCATION PUlON35EOFPROJECF SERVICE IR53DG 12j30 RELOCATION OF FACB.UDS- ALL NSTOMERS BRYAN RELOCATTONTOAVOm Mm RH.00ATEDIS UT[ON CONFLICFWIPROPOSEO FACILTRESASARFSULTOF PROTECT IBOJI W AY RECONSTAUMON 16956100 1,%1 WSTALLA7[014OFPIPEAND RESmFNT1AL PTUSN SYSTEMEXPAFIRON Jm APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUETONSTObffR INSTALL®DMST ON GROWTH FAMr FOR]HECOMPANY 1695T10G 4,424 WSTALLATIONOFPIMA PFSmEN'ML IffSODUE SYSTA5 m9ANS10N J. APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUETOCUSTOMER WSTALLED DISM[BU110N GROWTH FACOdI16S FOA Tiff COMPANY 169M030 2,157 AHON OF PPE AND RFSmENML £RISCO SYSTEMEXPANSION Apt APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUE TONSTOMEA JINVAPIM D13TALLEDDIST GRWRi O W FACRIlff 3 £OR Tf @ iMCOCOtffwNY I6%589G 2j09 INSTALLATION OFPIP RESIDENTIN, MCICROTEY SYSIPPAETO'ANS10N Jm APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUE iON3ttJMER Oi3TALLEDDISTR®UT[014 GROWTH FACdHT£S FOR TILE COMPANY 17I3]42G 15'mWSTALLATIONOFPTPEAND RESmENTW. ENNIS SYST@d EXPANSION Dec APPUATINANCFS-DEVF].OPER DUETONSTOMER WSTALLEDDI3]RIBUDON GROWTH FACRI FORTHECOMPANY 17133606 m WSTALLATIONO£PIPEAND RESmENTW. MCKDINEY SYSTAIEXPANSION Jm APPURTENANCES-DEVELOPFJt DUETONSTOMER WSTALLEDDISTRIBUTION GROWTH FACR tm'a FOR TEM COMPANY 17149MG (4) RELOC MONOFFACWTIES- ALL NSTOM3]t3 DALLAS RELOCATIONTOAVOID J. RELOCATEDTSIR®MON CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FAW.FF MIAMMTOF PROTECT STAEEFRECONSTAUMON 1715020G 1,454 INSTALLAHONOFPIFE AND RESmFNT1AL GRANOPRAIRff SYSFEMEXPANSION Mm APPURTF 01= -DEVELOPER DUETONSTOM1ffit WSTALLFDDISTR(BUI)ON GROWTH FACD.7NE4 FOR TJff COMPANY 17152966 H WSTALLATIONOFFIF13 N RESmENTW. ELO.ESS SYSTEMEXPANSION J. APARI]ENANCES-DEVELOPER DUETOCUSTOMER WSTALLFD49i FIMOF2- GROWTH PLASHCPffE AND 33 FEET O£ 075'PLASUCPff FORTHE 17156060 111,%3 REL nOFIOFFAC6FF@5- ALLNSTOMJ0E3 CEDARNRL RELO UONTOAVOm Sep RELOCATEDMS UUON CONFLICT W1PA�OSED FACRmPe ASARESULTOF PROffCf SIRPFT RENNSTRUMON 1715607G 4,303 RFLO MN OF FACO.RffS- ALL NSTOFffAS RICHARDSON RELOCATIWTOAVOW Aug RELOCATEDIS MOFI CONFLICT WIPROPOSED FAMFTDSASARE3ULTOF PROJECT STREETRECONSTRUCFION 1715%20 (15,034) INSTALLATION OF PIPE AND RESmENTLLL P£LUGERV SYSIFMEXPANMON J. APPURTENANCES-D13TALL DUETONSFOAffR DIST UT[ON FAM.WTIH GROWITI RFJM1IDUASFMENTFROM UESTWG CUSTOMER 17159%G 2jW INSTALLATIONOFPIP RE4mENTW. SAGWAW SYSTIIAE%PANSION Fsb APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUE TONSTONIEIF WSTALLEDT MON GRO WTH FACEITffCOA@ANY 1]1600]6 3160 INSTALEAnOKFORT)ONTfffOF PffE AND RESmENML FORT WORTH SYSTEXPANSION Feb APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUE To TONSTOAffR Oi3TALLEDT MON GROWTH FACLLI]IESFORFORIHECOI.PANY 17168EI9G 131,399 RELOCATIONOF£ACILUffS- ALL CIIS[Ob1FR5 DALLAS REL My RELOCATEDISTR®UIION IawlToA CONFLICTWIPROPOSED FACB.1TffSASwRE4ULT OF PROJECT PAV (NO AND DRA W AOE PRO]ELT Page 23 Df 155 C J • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID•TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 24 of 155 DESCR�IIM OF COMPLE2ED DATEPI.ACSD PROJECTS PLACED W GAS WGAg VTDITY PROJECT UTHJTY PL W SERWI 0]1 CDSIOMEIS PI.AIH' W NOAWER COST RETRED DU G2041 EENEFRED LOCATION PURPOSEOFPROJECT gER u 1716262G 22,551 SYSTFJN IMPROVEMENTS- ALL CUSTOb DENISON REPLACE ]u REPLACE DEIFRIORAM DORASTRUCTURE UMJERGROUNDFAW.= 17164600 5,914 RELOCATIONOFFAM=- ALL CUS>OMFAS ALLEI RELOCATIONTOAVODJ Jao RECOCATEDSTFUB ION CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FACLLROSASARFSULTOF PROSCI COMMERCW. DEVELOPMENT 1710090,3]0 RF10C MMOFFAOL=- ALL CUSTOMERS LEWISVD.LE RF TICNTOAVOM Da RUO TEDUMIBUTON CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FACD.IIff_SASARESSIILTOF PROJECT IGGHWAYRECONSTRUCITCN 171M136 5]6 PME AND RESSINIIAL DFNTONSYSTFMF "SIGNJ. APPURTENAS-WSTALL DUETOCUSTO JNSTALLAU%01F DISTVIH=GNFACD.H ,W GROW PARTAL RETMBllRSEbSNT FROM UESIPIG CUSTOMER 17166356 22.014 RML TDUMIBCB.ON ALL CUSTOMERS MANSFSLD RELOCATONTOAVOD) May RELOCATEDSO6SUTON CONFWCf W/PROIN)SFD FACB.ITIFSAS AR PRO]ECi STREET UMGNF 17166696 (151) MONOFTRUCIION RELOCAn ALL CUSTOMERS FORT WORTi RELOCATONTOA My DMMACD.ITIES- RELOCATEDL4TR®UTION CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FACASARFSIILTOF PROJECT StSTw DgLTTTWSTALLATON 1]1]024(3 ;039 WSTALLATOI40F POE ANO RISD)IDTTW. bSSON1E SYSTFMEfOANS10N leo APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER OUE TOCUSTObSR W3TALLEODISIRIBUTON GROWRi FA W.ITOS FOR TS COMPANY 17IT98G (20) TONOFFACD.RI6S- ALL CUSIObhRS DALLAS RELOCATIONTOAVOm lW RELOCATEDISIRSUTON CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FACEJIIESASARFSIII.i OF PROJECT PAVWGOPERATONS 17176096 9,742 SYSTMIb=MS- ALL CiJS[OMERS SAVOY REPLACE Fm REPLACEDETERJORAIORATFD WFRAS>RUCHIRE UNDERGROUND FAC6.ITRS 171g7JIG 13,343 RELOCATONOFFACDJTER- ALL CUSTOMERS RICILIROSON OTNAV Au OABDSU ONITPR D FA0AAFT PRCJET GLmmT 171916 3243 WSTAAnON OF PW ANO RESSENIW. ROWLECT SYSTEIAEJOANSION My APPURTA'ANCES-DEVELOPER OUE TONSIOMEA WSTAL GROWTH SFORMEMW FAC6.ITOS FOR TS COMPANY 17191266 (20,421) WSTALLATON OFPOEAND COMMERCIAL SOU3HLAI4: SY50TO=TN310N Mer NCFS_WS[ALL DUETOCUSIJ DLSTR®UTON FA WRN MTRJBE GROWTH FIWMS. REB.iBURSEMENTFROM 'HN0 CUSTOMER 17196596 750 OISTALLATON OFPOEAND RFSmENiIAL REELER 3YSTFME%PAN310N Aug S D1IE TOCUSTOMER 01`D.OPER WSTALLED 130 FEET OF 0.75' oiST 1110 OROWTf PLASTC POE AND 950 FEEL OF 2- PLAS]iCPOEFORTHECObOANY 17196750 1,429 111V ATONOFPOEAND RFSD)LNILLL FORTWORT9 SYST135EIG•ANSION Se APPUR3ENANCE3-DEVELOPER OUETONSTObIDt WSTATJJS DZUIB TON GROWTH FACBJT ES FORTS COMPANY 1]19]066 UW RFIOCATONOFFACE.TIIFS- ALL CUSIOMFli-4 MARBLE FALLS Jas ATONTOAVOM Ap RELOCATEDISIRSUHON CONTACT W/PROPOSED FACUd13 MARESULTOF PROJECT COAAOJIC W. DEVELOPMENT 17202030 81,036 RELOCATONOFFACD.1T1E5- ALL CUSTOMERS TS COLONY RdOCATONMAV06) Feb REI.00AIEDISTRS=H CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FACB.ITIFS AS ARESULT OF PROTECT STRFFTREMISTRUCIION Page 24 of 155 L C� J rIL ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID -TD( DIVISION GAS RELIABILJTY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 25 of 166 DFS ON OF NMPLETED DATE PUCSD PRQIECISPW Ui OAS pGAS UTILTFY PRO U'TD.IIYPLANF RS SESERVICE OR NS[OMERS PLANE R9 NUMBER BETIREDDURING ]ADS BENRFCIED LOGTION PURPoSEOF PROJECT SEFYICE IR0503G 3,05 3,IOS PISTALGTION OF PPE AND RESUIFN'RAL DESOTO SYSTEME%PANSION Feb APPURIENANCd-DEVON DUETONSTOMER DiSTAd GROWTH FORT0 COW FACR.CCRSFORIHECONPANY IROSBBG 4,M8 INSTALLATION OF PPE ATR) NAAP]iCW. MCRDINEY SYSIE3AF3PANSION Mm APPURTENANCFS-Di5TALL DUE TONSTONfF38 DPTR®UEONFACR.FFIES, WRH GROWTH PARTIAL RER.IRURSFAf ENFmOM UESRNG NSTOMER IR11050 32'1,535 Rd ATIONOFFAC6ON Ad N3i0b1ERRS DALLAS ION TOAVOID Feb RELOCATE DISA ME IO CONFl.ICI W/PROPOSED MMT FACPC[PS AS A RESULT OP PROTECT PAVING ANDDRAWAGE PROJECF IR19I9G 13.133 RdOCAT10N OF FACEFl1£S- ALL CUSTOMERS FORT WORTH MO !m FELOGTEDISTRIRUDON WlttmA CONFLICT W/PROPOSm FACR.I AR UMONF PROTECT WO NSTRUCDON 5IREECRFLO 1721931G 90,731 RIRACAUON ACR.ON ALL NSTOMERS LEWISVILLE RdOGT10NttJAVOm Dm RdOCATEDISTRU3I CONFLICFWAPROPOSED F T PROTECT GMAYSASARESULTOF HIGHWAYRECONSTRUCTION ]]E173G 9 ID9P&OVEMFN ALL NSTOMFltS LAKE DALLAS FORTPIGTJONOR J. MTS R EPADAND INS SYSTEM PPROVI]WENT GRAVELFORNEW METER FOR 17322930 33.953 SYSIEMIMPROVEMENTS- ALL NSIDAPRS 0.EBURNE REPLACE JW REPWCE I75 FEET OF CAST D30N DPRASIRUCNRE MADJS WITH 4' PWSTIC PPE 1]335130 I0j03 DgTALWI OF PPEAND COMI.gRCW. NPSOUITE EKPANSION J. APPURTENANCFS-DJSTALL DY DUE To xON3TOLffR DIRBDJUTION FA�. WITH GROW(H PART W.M0.IDUR4EBIEMTmw RE UFSIIlJGCUSFOMER 1'R36330 5,393 WSTALWRON OF PPEAND RESOJATNL WTLP SYSIEMEXPANSION Feb APPURTENANCES -DEVON DUENNSTONIDi Fd3TALLF IRVIION GROW15[ FACTLITPS FOR TFORTHE COMPANY IT1J235G 351.989 RELOCAHONOFFACR.I Ad CUSTOMFItS DAdAS d ONTOAVO My FELOCATEDISIR®ITIION JC MCONFWCT W/PROPoSPD FACR. E4AS A RPSULT OF PROJECF DRAWAGEPRO.IECI' 1T13353G (312) P9TALLAHON OF PPA NN3.43tCW. SAH ANGdO SYSTEMEXPANSION Qt APPURFENANCES-DISTAd TSS DUE TONSTOMER FEETOF2•PLASDCPPE, WIO9 GROWTH AE0.WURSFAtENTFROM UFSTDJOCUST(N.ffR ITJ3360G 26$13 SYS b- Ad CUSTOFPRS BRYAN REPWCE Feb A IFWTOF 4- REPLACE I FODTOP 9' WRAPPED DOTIASIRUCIURE STEd,318FEEl'OF 4"BARE SIEd, AND3M OF6•RARE S WFPECOF4" PLASHC PMB45PPE AND 3N FEHT OF 6• ITii3030 (5,513) INSTALLATION-PPEAND CONAfE19CW. ROIXWAd SYS]EMEXPANSION Mm APPURTETUNCES-WSTALL DUETOCUSTON1Eit DISTR®UTIONFACILIfffS. WRH GROWFH PARTIAL REP.IBUR9EMENT FROM UESTINONSTOMER ITL3305G 310 INSTALWTIONOFPIPEAND COMbiEROAL COPPEd SYSTEME]PANSION FW APPURTENANCES -DE OPER DWTOCUSIOMER INSTALLEDDISTR03VI30N GROWTH FACILI'FfE3 FOR THE COAPANY 17335000 9,348 RdOCAT10NOFFACR.THE9- ALL NSFOb1ERS SHERMAN INSTALLAHONOR JW RdOGTEDISTRICIREOUWTOR REPLACEMENT OF STATION MEASUREMENT OR REGULATION imim 147,832 RELOCATION u FACR.T7033- ALL NSTOMERS DALWS Rd AHONTOAVOID AR RELOCATEDISTR®UIION NNFMCT W/PROPoSED FACR.ITIESASAMMTOF PROJECT ALLEY IAPROVENEITIS Page 25 of 166 Ll c • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MIG-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2D03 Page 26 of ]55 DESCRIPTION OPC D MTEPACED PROJECTS PACED W GAS W GABIJIbPTY PRO3EC£ I1THdFYF1A SERW"OR CUSTOMERS PLANTA IBIIA>BER COSf RRTDIEDDURWG2m BENEFITED LOCATION PURPOSEOFPRO2ECT 6ERV 1Tt360]0 (1,461) SYSTEMEXPANSION Feb DUETOC TOroNFACR2TIE8,WTW N GROWTH ffllTFROM custom R IM7430 II,SM WSTALLATIONOFPPEAND RESmE FELLER SYSTEM EXPANSION Fab APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUETOCUSTomm WSTALLED I,2T)FEEIOF 6' GROWTH PLASTICMT,161 FEET OF Y PLASTIC PPE, AND 195 FEET OF D.75' PLASTIC PPE FOR T F E IT23819G 882 WSTALWTIONOFPPEAND RISIDENML WATAUGA WSTEMEEPANSION S, APPURIINANCES-DEVEIAPER DUETOCUSTONPR WSTALLEDDISTRIBUGON GROWTH £ACOATP_9FORTHECOMPANY IMM50 5D7 WSTALATTONOFPPEAHII RE9mENnee PWNO SYSTEM ANMON Jev APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER D mcu5roA1FJt WSTALLEDDISTR®UTION GROWTH FACB.TIIE9FOR 1T2386]G W3 FFCOMPANY WSTALLAIION OF PU'E AND RESDENML WATAllGA STSTFMEXPANSION Sep APPNRFNANCES-DEVELOPER DUE TOOWTH WSTALLFDDISIR GROWTH Mi COW FACB.[I'@9 FOA 113E COMPANY ITIA0830 55,911 SYSTEM IMPROVFbffNTS- ALL CUSTOMERS SNERMAN REPLACE Lo CE eCO FEET OF EXPOSED 6' @IDRASTRuCJURE DSTR®UTTONM WCREYIL CROSSWG 17241VO 11j99 WSTALLATTON OF PPE AND COMMERCW. GREENVRLE SYSTEM EXPANSION J. APPURTENANCES -INSTALL MS DUETOCUSTO E FEET Of PASIIC PDeE, WTIH GROWTH PARTGL RED+D3URSFMEMF FROM REQUESTING cusm R 1R45DG 3,732 SYSTEM OVFAfENTS- ALL CUSTOMERS VALLEY VB:W REFACE leo RFPLACEDETER[OHATHD WFRASTRUCNRE UNDERGROUNDFACB.TUES 124MIG 475 WSTALLATIONOFPPEAND RFSmENOAi. SYSJEMETPANSION Mq APPURTENANCES -DE OPER DUEroNSIONPR INSTALLED 6]4= OF P GROWTH PLASTTCPPE,1,113 FEET OF 2' PLASTIC PPE, AND 125 FEEL OP D.M"PLASTICPPEFORTHE 11249]60 1,348 RFIOGTIONOFFAMTTPS- ALLCUSTOMERS FORTWORTH R OCATIONTOAVOID Feb RELOCATE DISTR®NITON CONFWCTW/PROPOSED FACDOPSASARFSITLTOF PROPL-t RELOCATION TO AVOID CONE WCT WTIHSETVERLWE I1M004G 145,681 RBLOCAMONOFFACLLTITFS- ALL CUSi06PR.9 DALLAS RELOCATIONTOAVOM Sep RELOCATEDIS UTION CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FACB.RPSASAMULTOF PROJECT STRFFETRECONSIRuCDON IM189G[1,413 RESDENIW. I(EI.LFR SYS[FM EXPANSION lm APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUETOCUSTOAD]l 1��ATIONOFPHTAbD WSTALLmzm FmTOF2- GROWTH P W STIC PJPE, Abm 9M FEET OF D.TVFLASTICPPEFORT 17254100 WSTNLI.AIION OF PPE AND RESDFN'TTAL FLANO SYSTEM FJPANSION Feb APPURTIIJANCES-DEVELOPER DUETOCUSTOAffR WSTALLEDDIBTR®NITON GROW W FACB.ITIES FOR TI@ COMPANY IT255MG C ALLCUSIOhffRS NIESQUTIE COSTS WCURREDW AprREMOWDI OVAURREDWITHTHE FACm[TBS- RETUtWOFACB.TfIESRFMOVEDIS[RIBUTI(W RF3ACATIONO£FACG.IIIES- ALLCUSTOMERS FORT WORTH RFL D Fab NITON Ia WI ROPO CONFl.ICT WIftiORISFD FAMTIBDTSA FACU.ITIFS ASARFUCODNF PROJECT STREET RFCONSTRUCIIDN Page 26 of ]55 11 • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 27 of 156 DESCRIPS]ON OF MMPLETKD DATEPIAQLD PROI MPLACED IN GAS wGASDTD2TY PAWECF UTILRYPLANTwS WCEOR COSFOSf6RS P IN NUMBER COST RETIRED DORING 3003 BENEFFFED LOCAnON PURPOSE OF PROJECF SERVICE IR5822G (12) MSTA TEONOFPREAND RESD)EMIAL GRAPEVINE SYSnMEX M&QN ma APPURTENANCES-WSTA DUETONSmO DiSTRiBUnONFACRFDE4, W GROWER REWBURSEMENTFROM REQUP.STRJO NSFORRR IR5994G 3,244 SYSTEMIMPROV8.R2TF5-RETW ALLCUSTOMERS EERRVILLE wSF :DONOR On DISMCFREGULATORSTAMON REPLACEMENTOF MEASUREMEFU OR REGU mm 1T26]130 117 C0.4TwC11RREDWFFRTRE ALLCUSTOMFRS ARLINGTON COS3EwCURREDw Feb REMOVALOFFACRFTRS- REIRNIGFAMOMS RPMOWDMMBUOON 1'R m 414,069 RFLOCAnONOFFACD.JTIES- A MTOMERS DALLAS REI.00AnW70AVOID Fd RELOCAT OMS MON WNFLICFW/PROPOSED FACD.ITIESASARFSULTOF PROJECF PAV DSOAND DRAINAGE PROJECF 1726741G 2pw WSTALLAnONOFPDRAND COPAfERCIAL FRISCO SYSnOAERPANSION Aub APPURTENANCES -INSTALL DUETOCUSTOMER DLSTRFBMON FAC ,WDN moo PART W. R@.SBURSEtff NFmm TING WSTOARR IT26911O INSTALLAMNOFPREAND RFSmF]DIAL FaEDM SBU SYSTPM ERPANSION On APPURTENANCES -INSTALL RG DUETOCU%TONIDt DLS=UO0NFACR.DTES GRDWIN M71530RELOCMNOFFAMDFS- ALL CUSTOh EULESS RELOCAnON TO AVOM 1. RELOCATEDIS UTION CoNF W/PROPOSEDFACDMESASARFSULTOFCONTRACTORDAMAGINGMAIN1RTJ20G L558 wSTALLAnON OFPRE AND RESwEN[W. REN6LAMAR SYSTEMS FANSION Ap APPURTENANCES -INSTALL CO DUETOWSFOMERDISMBMON FACRSf� . WFFN GROWINRF]AIDURS66NHtENT FROM O1T274WC MTALLAnWOFPREAND RESmENnAL ENVRONS SYSTFMERP MON Fd APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUETOCUSTON®t MSTAILFD DISTRIBUTION GROV/IFI FAM=SFORTNECOMPANY MMSG 18,856 SYSTEMIMPROVENOwTS- CONRRTtCW. HUTTO SYSIFME%P %ON Feb FORTRICAnONOFOFFSM DUETONSTOMER MAIN , WITRPAR GROW RE0.IDURSEMENTBY ln7%20 425 MTALLAnONOFPREAND COMMERCW. MESQUDE SYSIFMM"SION My APPURTENANCES-WSTALLT55 DUETOCUSTOMER PEEFOF T PLASnCPJPB, WDN OROWFN PARTIAL RE0.IDURSEAf EM' FROM NSTOMER ITLJ578G 3,945 SYST 20ROVE6fEFRS- ALL CUSTOMERS OATESV62.E REPLACE Fd REPLACE 130 FEEFOF 3'WRAPPED D2FRASTRUCMtE STEELPIPEWRR130F OF3- M78100 (52,000) MTALLATIONOFPDEAND COMMERCRE FNVDtONS SYSnMEXPANSION AV APPURTENANCES -INSTALL 1,000 D1 TOCUSTOAR.R FFETOFe PLASI7CPMEAND500 GROWTH FEETOF V COATEDSTEEL PRE CODE RED.iBURSE1.fE11TFROM IRWUESIDFG CUSTOMERS 1]2]866(1 996 STSIEMD.iPROVFMENIB- ALLCUSI'OAffltS WACO REPLACE In REPLACEM FEEF OF C CAST DRW3TRUCNRE DtONPIPEW13 MFEETOFV 1R78810 (M) COSTwCURR1IDWRRTNE ALLCUSFOARRS WIRIEWRIGFIT COSI3INCURR®w J. RFMOVALOFFACRFFRS- RETIRING FAC� ABPFmON 115FEETOF 2- BARE S PRE IR]884G (34) COSiwCURRED W[w THE ALLCUSTOSfERS 7v1wEWNGNT COSTSwWRREDw J. REMOVAL OF FAC9.1FIE5- RETNwG FACEdFfES ABANDON TOO FEETOF S BARE STFI] PRE Page 27 of 156 CJ • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 28 of 155 DESCRBTION OF COABI I) DAIRPLAM PROJECTS FIACRD IN GAS VIGASUIULM PROJECT DTTT.ITY PLANT INSFRVICE OR CUSTOMERS PL w NOOOER COS[ RETIRED BB G2081 RENEFOED LOCATION PURFOSEOFPROJECT SERVICE IT28 441 SYSTEM APROVEMFNB- ALL CUSTOMERS MCRD4NEY REPLACE Im RF1'I.ACEl)=ORATED APRASTRUCITRIE UNDERGROUND FACH,ITD3 1'RB5(I6O 8,702 WSTALLATIONOFPPEMI) COMMERCIAL MCFWRDSON SYSIF IWMSION Feb APPURTENANCES -INSTALL DUETDCUSTO DISTABUTTONPACdfIPS, WTTH GROWTH FAOM VESTING CUSTOMER REOPAOT2ALREAB CUSTOMER IR8512G 14$93 STSTFAIIDPROVEMFNTS- ALL NSTOABR.S GADJFSV6IE REPLACE Jm REPLACE DETERIORATED OIFRASTItUCTURE UNDERGROUND FACLLPI>ES IR8554G 5],54) RELOCATIONOFFBIJT[OIES- ALL CUSTOMERS FORT WORTH RELOCATIONTOAVOm J. FAMITI EDIST CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FAC S.ESUT PRO= HFIANSTRU(LTOF SIRFET RFLONSIRUCIIOH 1'RB>31G 955 COSTDICURRFDWTIRTTB ALL CUSTON[ERS STEPfIF]vVW.E COSTS INCURREDIN 1x REMO ACROIES- RETIRING FACD.[OES N508 ABAI9ON 508 FEET OF Y PLASTIC PPE IRHMW 3366 DISTALLATION OF PPE AND RESmENiULL ALLIN SYJETO PANSION Aub OPER DUBTROWIFI MER 1157 DISFSBUTIO INSTALLED UOMP OROWIH FACD.TIIES POA TF1E COMPANY FORT 1'R88520 34.818 OTIO F AL CUS WYB OTTONTOAVOm lm OATISTSIB OOOSED FAWRPSASASEaUILTOF MO=T GOVERNMENTAL RE IIESI 1R88'OG 4jA SYSTEM - ALL CUSTOMERS ALVARADO REPLACE Da REPLACE D1=110RATE DPRASTRUCNRE 0M4D AM]= UNDERGROUND FACR.TIIES 1'RM196 51,1'M D2WFEETOFXS- ALL CUSTOMERS BRTAN REPLACE Mar REPLA STEEL REPLACE FEED OF OPRASTRUCNRE We V PPE AND 600 FEEFOF 6' SMM ITL88830 23,711 SYSTEM OAPROVEMENIS- ALL CUSTOABRS BRYAN REPLACE My REPLACE 558FEET OF 4' STEEL. DPRASTRUCNRE FIFE 0 FEET OP 4' P W STTC 1RB954G ]SS44 7EM UW SYShM ALL CUSTOMERS LEONARD REPLACE lm DETIUUEMENTS- IORATED DPRASTIOJCORtE IDIDER ROIJND UNDERGROIINDFP]PE S ITL89TM 2.369 INSTALL PE AND RESBEN'ML CEDARFB.L J. APPURTENANCES-DEVOAPER [ANCES DUETOERPANSEIt DUE TOCUSTONIDt INSTALL STRDIUOON GRO WTI] FACBJTTESFOSFOR THE COMPANY IT19000G 128 RELOCANON OF FACD.TIPS- ALL (XSTOMERS DEMON RELOCATIONTOAVOm )m RELOCATEDISTR CONFLICT W/PROPOSED C0.1' SS FARESASARFSMTULTOF PROJECT GOVFRNhBN VEST 12290010 103,190 RELOCATTON OF FACB.TTPS- ALLCUSTOABRS FORTWORTH RMOCATTONTOAVOR) J. RELOCATEDISMBIJT[ON CONFLICC W/ PROPOSED FACMI IESASARESULTOF PROJECT SIREETRECONSTRUCRON ITJ9202G 10.1" SYSFEM]34ROVII,BMS- ALLCUSIOTPRS BOWS REPLACE lm REPLACE215 FEET OF P SP IIffpASTRUCNRE PPE WOH 215 FSETOFV PLASTIC IR9331G 114 SYST IIWROVENIETTS- ALLCUSTOMERS ARLROGTON REPLACE J. REH ACE22b FEETOF4-SllgJ. WFMSIRuC PPE WRH226 FEETOF V PLASTIC I729523G 24.936 MSTALLAOONOFPOEAND RESDJENOAL WATAUGA SYSTEM ERPANSION Oa APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUETONSTOM1ffR D45TA WIXSTRBUOON GROW PACLL=FORTHECOWP 12293560 (1,252) WSTALLATION OF PPEAND COFAIFRCIAL K OS` SYSTEM EXPANSION Feb APPURTENANCES -INSTALL DUETOCUSTOHBR DISTRBUTION FACBJTPS, W(TH GROWTH PARTTALRETMBURSEbBNIFROIJ TINOCUSTOMER Page 28 of 155 C • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 29 of 155 ES MP[.ETED DATe PLACED PROJF.LI5 PLACED W GAS pGAg UIIlITI' PROIFCF UTW FW FFWSERVTCBOR (TISFOMEAS PLANTB4 N011IDER COST Fffi=DDU G2000 BENRFTTED IA mw PORPOBEOFPROJELT SERVICE In95656 33,059 SYSTEM]MPROVEMENTS- ALL DIJSIOhPR.s BRIDGEPORT REPLACE leu REPWCE 192 FEEFO 3' S1F]]. INFRAS94UCIIIRE PPEAND 102FMOF 2' STEFT. FPE WRJ[ lW FEET OF 3-PLASnC FPE AFID lot FEET OF r PLAsnc 17301366 72348 RE TION OF FACB.TIPS- ALL CUSTOAffR.S BRYAN RELOCAnON TO AVOID Mar RFtOCATEDISTRIBVnON CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FACDATDSASARESIILTOF PROJECT SEWFRREPLACEBffNT IM49G 451,084 RROCAnON OF FACB.RPS- ALL CUSTOb MR G RELOGnON TOAVOID AF RELOCATEDIS BLHON CONFLICTW/PROPUSED FACd1T1FSASARFSi1LTOF PROJECT RECONSTRUCTIONOFFA OAD UNDERPASS Iml%O (11,936) SYSFIIA ESPROVEMFMS- COMMER GRAND� SYSTEMEPANSION Feb FORTDTCAnON OF OFFSITE DIIETOCUSIOMER MA .WRH PARTW, GROWTH REB.IDURSESPNTBY Inomo 9,985 SYSTEM D. R'ROVEM16TF3- ALLCUSIO:.ffRS GARLAND REPLACE Jv REPWCE DETERIORATED DD;RASTRuC UNDFROROUNDFACD.ITEM IT303040 9,610 SYSTEM MR0VFb0lFS- ALL CUSTOMERS GARLAND REPLACE JW REPLACE DETERIORATED DPRlSTRTJCIURE UNDEROROUFIDFAMFTTES 19303050 18,891 SYST DPROVE81ENI5- ALL CUSTO.PRS DARLAND REPLACE JW REPWCE120F OFVBARE DPRASTRUCNRE STEEL PPE AND75=OF n30442G 1,824 DISTALWnONOFFPEAND RFSIDfilIDAl BRYAN SYSTEMF "BION Feb APPURTENANCES -INS TA LL 1,500 DUETOCUSTOMER FEETOFr PLASnCPPEANO400 GROWTH F 01F4"PLASDCPPE,WITH PART W. RFJMEURSEMENT FROM G CUSTOMER InMSG 9,116 SYSTR DAPROVEMEN7$- ALL CUSTOMERS ABD.ENB REPWCE Feb REPLACE200FEEFOFTBARB maF sIRIJCNRE STEELPPE WMFF[M=OF4' 1730 506 1NSTALLATIONOFPPEAND RESIDENTIAL FORTWORM SYSTFM]mPANs[ON Fub APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DU MMS'TOMER INBTALLEDDIBTRBLFOON GROWTH FACBATTES FOR WF COLPANY TnON4fF 20J65 RELOCAnONOFFACB.ITfE9- ALL CUSTOhPli.9 ALLEN RELOCATIONTOAVOID J. RFLOCATEwm[BUTION CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FACBAFFFSASARESIII-TOF PROMCF 00VERNM1PN T 173069W 276 SYSTFMI OVPAffNTS- ALL CUSTOMERS MANSFDiD FORTPIC nON OR J. REPLACEAffASURWG STATION SYSTEM D.PROVEbO]iT 19309686 n,459 RF1ACAnON OF FACB.RPS- ALL CUSTOMERS FGRTWORnI FMOCATONTOAVOID Sep RELOCATEDISTRIBlTOON CONFLICTWIPROPOSED FACB.ITPSASARF3ULTOF PROTECT SiREEF RECONSMUCRON 19310890 8,203 REL MON OF FAMFTI - ALL CUSFOMFltS PLANO RELOCAnONTOAVOID My RELOCATE WT MON CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FACB.TTEM AS A RESFJLT OF PROTECT CUSTOF4R RE LEST 19311996 6A301 SYSTEMA OVEMENTS- ALL CUSFOMFRS DALLAS REPWCE Jen REPLACE 185= OF 8' WRAPPED IN fR mu=E STEFI. PPE WRH 199=OF 8' 193/2930 2,794 RELOCATIONOFFACB.FTIES- ALG CUSTOMERS FORTWORTN RELOCADONTOAVOID Fd RFI2CATE DISTRE3URON CONFLICT WI PROPOSED FACBATIES AS A RESULT OF PROJECT s=FRECONSTRurnON IM2970 (18,920) RELOCAnON OF FACB.IIIEs- ALL CIISTOMFRS FORTWORTH RE1 nONTOAWW lu ROA(: ATB DLSTR®llIION CONFLICT WI mo FACB.n1FSASARE9LLTOF P cO r STREEFRECONSTRUCDON Page 29 of 155 CJ c • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 30 of 155 DESCR ION Ut UUWJZTED DATEPLAMI PROJECISPLA(EDwGAS WGA UTIU3Y FROJECF OTILFFYPL WSERVJCEOR CVSFOM PLANTD9 NUAfBER COST RETwEDDU G20Rt BENEFITED LOCATION PFIRPOEEOFPROKCF SERVICE FJ31299G 22 MOCATION OF FACILRIES- ALL CUST06483 WATAUGA RELOCANONTOAVOID J. RFLOCATEDIST UFION COFDLICFW/PROPOSED FACJLITESASARESULTOF PROJECT STRFEFRECON5TRUCJION 1731923G 4,553 wSTA TIGNOFPEEAICI RFSwE DAU.AS SYSTIzmwANMON May APPURTENANCES-wSTALL DUETOCUSTOMFR DISTRIBU3IONFACO.RIF_i WDii GROW131 PARMAI.REDdBUR5EbID mom REQITESTwG CUSP 1.1319996 15388 NSTALLATIMOFPIFEAND COMMER RERRVD.LE SYSTEM EXPANSION Oct APPURTENANCES-wSTALt DllETONSTOSEA DISTR®IInONFACD.ITO3, WFJH GKOWTIi PARMALM!161 SE FROM UNSTOMFR 7213/6 (4) REOCKF[OFFAE- TFAGIE RL V lm OMDESTR®UOON N(:TWIPRO® FAMITIm;TAuETlONOF SULSOF PROJECT INSiALLAnONOF NEW CITY 1733663E 115,397 RELOCAnONOFlBUTXF�S- ALL CUSTOMERS BRmGEPORT REFAIawl TO AVOID J. RELOCATEDISFR®ITOGN CONFLICTW/PROFOSED FACD.IIESASARFSUUIMTFF PRO1FCf GOVFRNSIONOF UFSI 1733]810 808 ALL CUSTOMERS DAWSON RE !m RLTACA TE DIOFFACG.ON ICTW/FOAVOm CONFLICTWIPROPOS® ASTMULTN FAC6ITIFSASARFSTIUIMT PROTECT GOVERM.iONCAL UEST 17327980 1599]] RFLO ALL CUSTOMERS MIDLO'IIDAN RELOCAnONmom= Fd M DISFFAUR.TTIES- RELOCAIEDISFRIBUDON CONFLIFRO=TOPOSED FACDJTIESASARESULTOF PROTECT OOVERM.GNTAt RE IIFST 17330MG 121,452 R 3- ALL CUSTOMERS D1MON RELOCATION TOAVOm J. MA=ISTIFEIUTlM RELOCAT CONFLIROJIPROPOSED ASAIUU T FTU=IUMONST PROTECT LUMONF STRI£IRECONSTRUCDON IT331MG 99,781 RELOCAMDMTIUACB.NIES- ALL CUSTOMERS MCKwNEY RBACawfm AVOm F. FELOCATEDTSFRIBIJTWN CONFL[CTWJPROPOSED FAOWIRW SARE PROJECT RPR STOAMPEEANDSEM PROIECF 1733342E )63 1NSTALLAnON OF PIPEAND COMMERCW. TYLIIt SYSTEMIOIPAN510N Ape AFfFETTOF2'FLA 3C ALL1920 DUETROWTki EER FEEF OF Y PLASTIC PD`EAFDJ200 GROWTH PEEFOF 117 PLASIICPEE, WRN PARTIAL REBeIDURSEMEBII FROM REQIIEST[ONO31'OAffR 1'D3830G 8,199 RELO CDATiES- ALL CUSTOMERS I.EWIS VRIF RFIACAnONTOAVOm Im RELOCAMDISFTEDISFATR®UFRJN CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FACILITES AS A RESULT OF PROJECT gWAUwAGOLL rom 17340386 139,345 FPIP wSTAL1An�i OF PEE AND ALL CUSTOMERS COPPELL FOR'[IFICAnONOR lm TAL14960 NAN SYSOON =OF6. nCPHE,RE OP2-mA!SDCDEWFR 6'FLFIAMV 114810 10918 RMO(2XnNOFFAC- ALL CUSIObffR.S WACO RI1ACTEONTOAVOM Mm RELGCATEDISTRIBLTION CONFLCT W/PROPOSED FACD3iES AS ARESULi OF PROJECT' wCRFASEO LOAD IT112NG (107) SYST OV EIOFBA]- ATI@JS REPLACE J. (MIN OF BARE 3fEEL DERASIRUCIURE PwEWFE100FEEI PBE WAnGROSncelPe ITJ4252G 101 RELOCAnON OF FACR.F[IE4- CORSICANA RF Om Jm RF]ACATEDISTR®UnON t—-t- ICTWIPR CONFLICT W/PROPOSm FACDITESA3 ARESIR.T OF PROIECF $TRFETRECONSIRUCUON IAR09G 1932 COSTwCIIRRED WFITt'IHE CRAWFORD COSTS wcuulmw Feb R OVALOFFAMTG6!I-IU= REIDIWG FACR= 2FEETOF2'WeAPPEDS] PRE Page 30 of 155 • C� ATMOS ENERGY CORP.. MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 31 of 155 DEscWTEON OF COWUUDMW. . PROS M PL CED W GAS W GAS U[WTP PROJECf UTTLITYPLANSBSE WV OR CUSTOMERS PLANTm NUMBER COS[ RE=DDURING20B BENEFOED LOCATION PURPOSEOFFRO8 SEHRCE 1]]53610 (2) WSTALLATIONOFPWEAND RESIDFITOAL GRAFIDPRARUE SYSIFM EBPANSION IW APPURTENANCES-DVSTALL 130 DUETOCUSFOABR FEETOF 2' PLASRCPPE, WITH GROWFN PART W. REOriB� FROM llES1ING CUS[O64]t 1)353NO 1],]69 RELOCATION OF FACO.ITPS- ALL CUSTOMERS ROCI:WALL RELOCATION iD AVOID Ale RFLOCATEDLSDLBVOON COTffLICFW/PROPOSED FACD1 MIARE3ULTOF PROBCF SOUBFR NSTRUCIION DISSALLA"OF PPE AND 1T354650 3,1M RESIDENTIAL GARLAND SYSIFMEXPANSION a1 APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DIIE'LO CUSTOMER BETALLEDDISTRBIITI- GROWN FACB3TIF5 FOR THE COMPANY 1T35592G 1,982 SYSTEM ROVEMENTS- ALL CUSTOMERS WACO REPLACE Mvr REPLACES'TEFS. MAWS WITH INFRnSTRUCNRE PLASRCPPE 11357100 53,503 WBT ARON Of PPEANDRESIDENTW. GFAROEIDWN SYSTENSEXPANSION Jen APPUATENANCPS-DEVELOPER DUETOCUSTOM1IDt 1NSTALLEDDISTRBUOON GROWN FACOI FORTHECOMPANY 1135R4G 62,183 DXSTALLARON OF PPE ANLL RE9IDENOAL OBORSEFOWNSYSIFM EXPANSION J. APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER D.To CUSTOEIDt MTA DISTRB3UTION GROWN FACERPSFORTHECOMPANY 19315116G 2,958 RELOCATION OF FACR.TIlFB- ALLCUSTOMBRS FORTWORTH M6 MONTOAVOD Feb RELOCATEDUMIUDON CONFUCFW/PROPOSED FACO.RPSASARFSULTOF PROBCI GOVERNMENTAL UESF 1931685E 26,817 FY—T ] WROVEM1BIiIS- ALL CUSTObBRS WACO REPLACE My REPLACE330FEEFOF4'CASF INPMSTRUCIURE IRONPIPE WRH350 FEEF OF a' 193!9006 990 D9STALLARONOPPPEAND COMSBRQAL DUNCANVD.LE SYSTEMEX MMON Jan APPURTENANCES-D16TALL DIBTOCUSSObIDt DE BURON FAMOM. WRH GROWN PARTLY. RFJbBUR.5EI.IDIIT FROM REQUESIDIG CUSTOEBR 19320630 F 95 B132ALLATION OF PPE AND RESIDENTW. AUSTIN SYSTEM EXPANSION Mry APPURTENANCES-D9STALL DUETOCUSSOb1E18 DISMSUTION FACD.ITIFS GROWN 193215M lq761 RELOCATION OF FACRRPS- ALLCUSTOE GARLA3ID REIACATIONTOAVOW M RELOCATEDMTIwI TON CONFIIa W/PROPOSED £ACD.ITIPSASARE3ULTOF PROIECF GOVERPBIENTAL 11ESF 193219/0 3p]b D95TALLARONOFPPE AND RE9IDENOAL XELLER SYSIFAI F%PANSION Dx APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUETOCUSTOMER INSTALLED9,862FEETOF2" GROWN PLASTIC PPE, 3,130 FEEF OF 3' PLASTIC PPG 3,600 F££F OF 4' PLASTIC PPE. AND 6,6]0 = OF 0,7$' PLASTIC PPE FOR THE 1932333G 416 RELOCATIONOF FACD.ITIE9- All. CUSTOMERS MANSFD]D RELOCARONTOAVOID Oa IDI MDISTRBURON comICFW/PROPOSED FACBATPSASARESULT OF PROTEGE EASFMENTISSIIFS 1932W]0 18,88 RELOGTIONOFFACD.NPS- ALLCUSTOMERS DALLASRELOCARONTO AVOID Aug R6IACATEDMTIUBUOON comm T W/PROPOSED FACDITPSASARESULTOF FROIECI' PAV oAND DRAINAGE PROJECT 19330UG 4.168 MSTALLATION OF PPE AND CObD.DACIAL WIC AFALLS SYSTEM EXPANSION Mu APPURTENANCES-wsTALL aDLIETOCUSFOABR =OF2'PLASRCPPEAND GROWN 19332186 31,167 RELOCATIONOFFACD.RPS- ALLCUSTOhBRS FREDERICXSBU R£LOCATIONTOAVOM Oc RFlOCAN DIEPRBUDON RO CONFLICTWIPROPOSED FACD.RPSASAAESULTOF PROTEGE SIREETRECONSIRUCOON Page 31 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 32 of 155 DSSCRVTTON OFNW DATEPTAGYB PROJECTS PLACED IN GAR p�3rpp,DY PROJER UTTLTTYPL WSMWCEOR CUSTOMERS PLANTR4 NO.NHER NSf RBTOIEODU Gm BENEFITED LOCATION PURPOSEOFPROJRR MR"U 19333670 II,NS RFLOCAHONOFFACB.RPS- ALL NSTO6PR5 LANCASTER RELOGTIONTOAVOM AN RELOCATE DISTR® ON CONFLICPW/PROPOSED FACBdpP ARFSUITOF PROTECT GOVERNMENTAL REQUEST 1933103G 12,122 SYST BNPROVFD4NTS- ALL NSTOMERS WAN REWACE lm REPLACE IOOFEEr OF 3•BARE IWRASDtUC STEEL PPE WTTTT I IO FEEF OF Y 193MISO 21 WSTALLATIONOFPPEANO RFSmENTW. ML o SYSTEM EXPANSION ]m APPURTENANCES-DI:YELOPER DUETOCUSTOb1ER INSTALLED515 FEEF OF 2' GROWFN PLASTIC PPE FOA TI♦E NM1PANY 1933/420 (1,111) INSTALLAHON OF PPEAND NMMFRCW. ENWS SYSIIMFJPANSTON Feb APPURTENANCFS-INSTALL DUETONSTObff13 DLRTR®IITfONFACB.ITPS, WITH GROWTH PARTW.R NF FROM TB4GNSTObPGcuSTOmF R 1933510G (1.333) DTLLATON OF YTXNSION AX ANCINSTLL40 DUTONOM EOYAncpvEW GROWTH FFROM RED.iBUTNO W UFSTINGNSIOAPR 19336660 $,130 PATALLAl10N pF MDUSTRIAL PORT WORTH SYSNAS EXP Feb FURAND APPURTENOFMF PURCRASE OF DUE TO CUSTOMER OWR 3,500 FEEF OF PNSTALLID6' GROWM PLASTIC PPE 19337I50 2}A STALLATION OF PPEAND [PSmENrter CNPER J. DMTOEXPANSION DUE TOOUSTOAfER TUBENANCFS-INSTALL STRIBUTIONFACDJTP$ EQ�G GROWM RTLU.R 0. m STOFMENI'FROM 19333%G 11,053 ATNSTOMFR DNSTALLAHON OF PIPE AND ALL NSTOMFRS ROUND ROIX FORTPIGTION OR Fd APP 6' SYSIFI.T OPROVEh1FJttf MPIANCFS-N-35 PCASUCPPONWDI-35 19340030 3}2] OF OISTALLAHON OF PPEAND NMMERCW. ROIXWALL Apr APPURTENANCFE-BiSTALL DSYSTOEXPANSION ILETER MELEES AND $ERVICELD4E4 GROWTHROMTEE 19340260 5}22 PNSTALLAHONOFPIPE NMMER PLANO SYSTEMS "SIGN Da APPURTENANCES -INSTALL DISI TOCIJbTOAfER DMMBUTIONFACD.ITPS, WITFI GROWTH PARTLLL RE0.IBURSEbP W' mom NSTONffit 1939%IG 2J4 NSTA TIONOFFJPEAND RESNENTIAI. MCXW6IEY SYSTEM EXPANSION J. APPURTENmm - mnS DUETOCUSTO6IlRt DISTR®ITDONFACD.RPS, WRIT GROWTH PAR)TALRE0.ffiURSEDff mom G NSTOMFR 1934091G 26,103 SYSTFM]MFROVEb1ENT8- ALL NSTOMFRS DALLAS REPLACE Nov REPLACE41F= OP8'CATRM OPMSIRUCIfJRE PPE AND 1 FEET OF 6' CAST IRON PPE WHH 16FESTOF 3•PLASTm PPE AND 4 FEE! OF 6' PLASTIC I934101G 33,157 RFLOCATIONOFFA�- ALL NSIOAffR4 FORT WORTH FMOCAnONTOAVOID J. RELOCA)EOISTRBUITON CONFLIRW/PROPOSPD FAC E.ITIE9ASAMMTOF PROhR RMOO 19343tOG 3}N TECONRTRUC11ON RELOCATEIDMMBUTEON 9- ALL NSTObffRS CISCO RELO=WIPOAVOm Frb REI.00ATEDLSTRm CONFl.ICI W/PROPOSED MT PROJEC! STE=FRASARESULON STREEF RENNSTRUCRON 1931390G 22}9] SYSTII.ID.PF=OFS'B- ALL NS-1'OhDRS WAN REPLACE ]m REPLACEIINFEETOFP BARE DPRASTRUCIURS STE[1 PPE WITH T%FEET OF 3' 19316180 662 - RELOCAHONOFFAC6TNE4TQF ALL NSTOMERS WA%AHACF� RSLOCAHONTOAVO Da RFLOCATEDTSTRmUTTON CONFLIR W/PRORISED AOD.RPRASa RF PROTFlT NMU STORM SEWER RENNSIRUCIION Page 32 of 155 11 • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Pape 33 of 155 DFSCBR OFCO DAreeLA PROJECTS PLACED w GAS WGASUTDJTY PROJECT UIDJTYPL WSERVICEOR NSPoASERS WANTw NUf10EB CObT RETIRED DURING 2003 BFIiEFI'fED TACATION PIJRPOSe OFPROJECT SRRVICE 19346L50 8,636 RmOCAT10NOFFAC=S- ALLWSTOb1FA5 BURRBURNER RELOCAnO MAVOM J. RFLOCATEDISntwUnON WNFLICT W/PROPOSED FAMMES AS A RESULT OF PROTECT WVPRM.@NTALRpQum 19346W0 3 53 R6 AnON OF FAMMES- ALL WST0NIER3 ALLEN RELOCATIONTOAVOID J. RELOCATEDISTR BMM CONFLICT W/PROPOSm FACBRIIESATGOVERNMENT PROJECT 19350256 151,5W RELOCAMMWFACE.n)E.S- ALL CUSTONII)i5 FORT WORTH RELOCAMMN AVOM lm Mm ATEDISTRBUM CONFLIRW/PROPOSm FACdi]ISSASARESULTOF PROJECT STREETREWNSPRUCTION 1935136G 6,008 WSTALLAANCES PWE RESmENI1A1 FORT WORTH SYSTm EXPANSION Feb O S-B=0N PE0. DLIETROWM ER MSTA MDlS wST GROWTH ESDISn1m OW FACdRNSFO COMPANY 19331316 108,89] OF RFJACATBDIS ACILI'[B:S- ALL WSTOMRS FORT WORTH RmOCawlm AVOm J. RA=ESDISTR®UTION CONFLICT W/PROPoSm FACR.1'1'ffS AS ARESULON PROJf:CT STUFE'I' RE WNSTRUCITON 19352560 1,822 ALL WSTONIFRS SHERMAN REPLACE lm REPLACEDETFRFAM INFRASIRIICIURE llNDERGROUND PAC6ITIES 19353930 13,311 SYSTEMIM9ROV S- ALL CUSTOMERS SANANGELO REPLACE Ja0 RFPLACE339FEETOF2'OF2•BARE 1NFRASnHICfliRE STEII. PBE WfIH ]l9 £PPI'OF 2' 19333960 (91) SYSTEM DriPROVEb1EMS- ALL CU5TOFffRS GRFJ]JVLLLE REPLACE Je0 REPLACE SnF1 MAINS DD'RASTIUICTURE 1935 11,'HI SYSTEMD.B'ROVFMf2JTS- ALLWSTOb1ER5 SANANGELO REPLACE Fub REPLACE320FEETOFVBARE INPRASIIGICTURE STIR].PWE W1TH220FEETOF4• 1935]060 15,741 SYSTEM IMPROVT].0TT5- ALL WSTOXEAS SANANGM0 REPLACE J. REPLACE 340FEET OP B' RARE R9E'RASTRUCTURE SIEELFTEWTIH340F OFS' 193VBSG 2] WSTBJCDREm WHHTHE ALL CUSTOMERS WFSTWORTH WSISwCURR J. REMOVALOFFACRITIES- V LAGS R 0FACd= ABANDON 955FEETOF4- WRAPPmSI]]].PME 19358HG 6,752 RELOCAnONOFFACD.ITIFS- ALL CUSTONDSS A=(PAREER RFJACAnO TOAWM leo RELOCATEDISnUBUTION WUNTY) COFR'LICTW/PROPOSED FAMMSSASARRSTILTOF PROTECT WVERNb1E8RAL RE UESI 19359206 12,591 RELOCAnON OF FACB.IIIES- ALL WSIOMFRS MANO RELWAnDNTOAWM Feb RELOCATEDISTRIBUTION WNFL W/PROP FA�SASARESULTOF PROJECT WVERN64N VEST 19359356 49,835 RFJACAnONOFFA=E3- ALLWSTOMERS FORTWORTH REIACAMNTOAWM Mor REIACATEDISTRBI m WNFLICTW/PROPoSm FACdTJBSSASARFSULTOF PROJECT MGH WAY RECONSTRUCTION 19359630 11,898 SYSIFMwSROVEMEMS- ALL CUSt0MERS LEONARD REPLACE leu REPLACE DEIERIORATm INFRASIRUCNRE UNDERGROUbm FACGTDES 19360150 36,945 TALUnONOF Am WMMEJBCW. DALLAS SYSTEMDWANSION lm PURTENANCES-wSTALL DUETO WSmM MB@ ON FACB.ITTFS, WHH 10MMG GROWTH R.iBURSFLIENTFROM CITSTOb1ER 19363M 903 WSTALLAnWOFFOEAND RESmENTW. AVTNG SYSTEM EXPANSION AV APPMR ANCE3-DEVELOPER DIJETOWSTO INSTALLm1RIPEETOF3' GROWJH PLASTICPMEFORTHECO ANY 193652/6 1,693 RELOCAnONOFFACdRffS- ALL WSTOAIER.S WAW Mm AMWMAVM t6ar RE LOCAUEDISTR BMON CONFLICT W/PROP AM=SASARESUL PROJECT RTOF MAMKN AWm WNFLIM wnWi.ERHOMEPARR Pape 33 of 155 CJ • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 34 of 156 ffl�onUyBRLBTEO mA P MD PR03EC1S PLACED M GAS M GAB NR.RY PROJECT UTDIFYPLANTMSMW(MOR CUSTOMERS PI.MTM NUAIXER COST REFIXED DI G2061 BBPBFRED LOCATION P11RP03EOFPROJECT 3FJ"m 193655/6 6 RELOCATIONOFFACD.TTDR- ALL CUSTOMERS CLARESVdLE RELOCAHONIOAVOID J. BELOCATEDISTRBUTION CONFLICT WIPRMO FACdRiF ARFSULTOF PROJECT SEWFRPROJECT 19 OOG 20,612 3YSTE1AIMPROVFABNTS- ALLCIISTO6ffA.9 BFLLMFM REPLACE AW REPLACE 290 FEETOF V BARE MFRASIRUCIl1RE S= FVE WfIH319 FFEIOF 4- 19365910 6 RHAC MMOFFAC6ITDR- ALL CUSTOMERS COOPER RELOCATJONTOAV leo RELOCATEDMS VIION CONFLICTWIPRomO FACDPIFSASARESULTOF PROTECT PAVRJGOPERATIONS 19366180 1j38 RELO MONOFFACU.I - ALL CUSTOMPRS CEDAR PARR REIACATIONYOAVOm Nee RELOCATEDLSTRIBUTION CONFLILTW/PROPOSED FACIJTDRABARESULTOF PROTECT STRFETFECONSTRUCDON 19366990 6 SYBTEM DDROVESIENIB- ALL NSTOBBRS GREENVBLE REPLACE lee REPLACE DETERIORATED DIFRASTRUCTURE UNDERGROUNDFACTLRBR 1936TNR3 26.131 SYSTEM WROVEMENTS- ALL CUSTOMERS SFffRMAFI REP4.CE J. REPLACE DETERIORATED INFRASTRUCJURE UNDERGROUND FACI.TTDS 19mnfl 2,160 INSTALLATION OF PDE AND RESmENIW. ARLDiGTON SYSTEMw"SION Ae8 APPURTENANCES-WSTALL DUETOCUSTOMER DISIRIBUHONFACLLTTDS, WJTH GROWTH PARTLIL RFAB(IRSFAfENT FROM 1W0CUSTOMER 1936I53G 210 RELO ALL NSTOMF]tS MANSFIELD RELOCAr Jao MD]OFIBC 019ES- TEDISAMUTN WITOAVOm CONFL[CTWIPROPOSED FACH. FACRIIlE ARE9ULTOF PRO]ECC COM6ffRC W. DE VELOP� 19368110 '11.165 SYSIFMI1DROVELBTO'S- ALL NSTOM1BRS DALLAS REPLACE lm REPLACE10 FEETOF 12- BARE MFRABTRUCNRE STEEL ME WRH IN FEET O£ 12- 19369M 695 SYSTEM3ffN'TS- ALL CUSTOMERS 'CEIrDLE REPLACE Jm REPLACE0I=[0DETERIORATFD DDRASIRUCIURE UNDERGROUND FACI.Ff BS 191689901j55 INSTALLATION OP PDE AIm RFRmENIW. K®B SYSTEMEXPANSION Apr APPURTENANCES-MSTALL DUETOCUSTOMFR DISTRIBVIIONFACLLD'DS, WRH GROWTH PART W. REMffiURSEhff NF FROM UESTMG CUST01.ffR I93I0050 I0,T20 MSTA 7[10N OF PBE AND COMMERCW. QRBURNE SYSTEM WANSION leo APPURTENANCES-]NSTALL DUETOCUSTO DISIXJBMON FACI.IIIFS, WITH 0110 1 PART RIRMBIIR40EBNT FROM UFSTMG CUSTOMER 1931MSG SYSTFMD OVEMENIS- ALLCUSTOMFRS SEAGOVILLE REPLACE Ale REPI.ACEDAMAGED DDRASTRUCTURE UNDEROROUFIDFACD.ITIES 19 nMG RELOCATIONOFFACBATIES- ALL CUSTOMERS TFRRELL RELOCATIONTOAY= J. OGTEDISTRBUTION CONFLCTWIPROPOSED FACI.RD ARESULTOF PROTECT r326.57D STREETRECONSTRUCITON 193)3990 RELOCATION OF FACI.iTIXS- ALLCUST06ffRS WACO RELOCATIONTOAVOm 1m RELOCATEDIBTRJBIMM CONFLICTWIPROPOSED FACIITDE AB A RFRIR.T OF PROTECT DRIVSWAYMIMUCIION 193]1086 MA MWOFFACIlT1lER- ALL CUSTOMERS DALLAS RELIX'AHONTOAWID Aub RELOCATE DISTR®UFION CONFLICT WIPRM= FACO.OBSASARESB.TOF PROTECT PAV MGAimDRAMAMPROTECT MUM 9.381 MSTALLAHON OF PDEAND C089MRCW. CARROLLTON SYSTESIEXPANSION My APPBBTENANCGS-INSTALL 1,181 DUETONSTOMER FEETOF T PLASTIC PDD. WTIH GROWTH PARTIAL REI.BURSEMEM Flmb1 TING CUSTOMER Page 34 of 156 • 11 ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 35 of 155 DESC ON OF C DATEPIACEO PROS SPLACEDMGAS DI GA8J1fIMTY PROTECT IRdTFYPLANFRISERVICEOR OBFO84;R.S I PIANT05 NUBQER COST RETIRED DTIRR4G 2003 BENEFIIi;D LOCATION PURPOSE OF PRM SERVICE 1937%IG 3,624 INSTALLATIOFJ OF PIPEAND COMhffRC1AL RIILEEN SYSTEM E%PANSION Jae APPURTENANCES-INSCALL 240 DUE TO CUSTOWR FEEFOF2'PL MCPIPE,WITH GROWTH RENiBUR3@.4IIT FROM REQPARTIAL UESnONOISTOMER 193)6880 1)bj53 3- RMOCATIONOFFACB.lIETO ALL OSTOMEItR FORT WORTH RHIACATIONTOPOSIM Drs REIACAT CONFLICF W]PROPoSED SDISTRIBUTION FACRIT4SA3ARUCU PROTECT ONF CONSTAUCHON 51ST] 193)RRG 3,196 A INSTALLATION OPP RESmENIIAL COLLEYVrtrc SYShTJCU'ANBION Jen SSE APPURTENANCFS-DISTALL pUE iOORFOME1t D18TRIBUTIONFACB.ITtE$ GROWTH PARI W. REQABURSEbIDTT m £AOM STRJOOSl'OA¢]t 193)]660 19,9TI RYRTIFIDnROVFAfENT3- ALL OSTOB¢R4 IOI.T.EIIJ RYSIE MERPANSION Dec FOR 10N OFOFFSRE DUE TOOSTOMER A S(114 L328 FEEL OF 6' OROWOF P Sm(WRTALL PLASTIC PUS AND 169 FM 0£3' PLASTIC PIPE}WEER PARTIAL REODUSR A¢Nt FROM TINGCUSTOMER 193]1910 32103 SYSTEMO.flROVEb1FlTi5- ALL OSTOLIERS BONHAM RkPJ,ACE My REAa RATED U4FRASI]RICRINE UNDFAGROUfIDFACB.RIER 1937898G 30125 SYS' I ALLORTOMERS WACO REPLACE Mry AE 31PRO21FVF1.4 REPLACE 31El:F OASF INERASIRUCIURE FFJTOF 4' IRON PIPEI4OF 193)8550 28,903 F2 RELOCATIONOFFAO.ITD:4- ALL ORIOMFRS L RELOC=WIF My REI.OGTEDISTRJBUIION MLAGTH VII.LAOE CONFLICT W/PROPOSED OPOMD FACB.I ASARuS PAOIEC[ R ONF 3]STF 193)8860 43,430 ACONQFFMION OIRTALLATIONO-D ANO RFSR)ENTIAL GEORGE[OWN RYSIEOCUS NRION lm APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUE TOOUSTOFffIt 2NSTALLPoDIRTRIBU GROWTH OW PAC6TUERFOR COMPANY 19319R0 54,024 RFLOCATIONOFFAFACWIpFS- ALL CUSTOMERS RICHAAOSON RMOCAMONMAWW lee RELOCATE OL4TR®UTION CONFLIW/PROPORED FACB.ITIES AS A RESULT OF PRO= ALLEY 1MPItOVEM1RNTS 19383600 (23,913) SYRTIFI4 ALL OSi@41t5 MELISSA FORMIMPT10NOA Feb nONOMENIS- FOR]IFICATION OFOFFRIIE SYSTEM IMPRO� MAWS. WFIN PAR'f1AL REO.IBU TBY 19382856 21,690 MPRO SYS]FMLWPRO ALL OSTOEffRS WACO REPLACE Mer OF2'S- REPLACE224FEEFOF2•CASF BORASTINCNRE BION P@EAND 164 FEETOF 4• CARTWONPIFE WITH268E 4' PLASTIC MEAND 230 FEET OFF 19383180 10159 DiSTALLATION OPPIPE AND OAAIFRCW. OERURNE RYSIIM len APPURTENANCFS-INSCALL DUE TOMSTOMERSTOAffX D13TR®UiIONFACdITG:4, WAIF GROWER PART W, �URSEbff NFmom ff�UESTORTOAD]t 19383160 13,910 RYSTEMEMBROVEMENIS- ALL OSIOMERS KERRVB.LE REPLACE $ep REPLACEDEFE RVFRASIRUCITIRE FACMID UNDERGROUND FACB.iIiFS 19383486 8,066 OVSTALLATION OF P@EAND OFII.G]iCW. LO SYSIFMEJIPANMON lee APPIJRTENANCR9-INSTALL (GREGGGREOO DUETOOSTOeffR DISIR®NITON FACdilIE9,WlOI COUNTY) GROWTH ARTLLL REQ�URSEbffNF FROM UESAn OFPIPE 19383TZG 3,045 INSTALLATION OFPBSTNL RESmENn•r MCSINNEY SYSFTOESMWR Feb APPURTINANCER-OMES DUETOOSTObRR D18TR®UTION FAN,FIIFS GROWTH Page 35 of 155 • 0 • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 35 of 155 DESCRBTIOI90F CO DATEPLACFD PR03ER5 PLACED W GAS LY GASUTRITY PROJECT UTRdTYPL WSERVICEOR CUSTOJe6R8 PLANTP' NUMBER COST Rrnor.DD11RESG2005 BENEFFIED ZACATION PURPOSEOFPRO3ELT SERVICE 19385310 14,533 WSTA 7OMOFPIPEAND COM1D.4]tCW. RICNARDSON SYSTEMERPANWON May APPURTENANCES-OJSTALL DUETOCUMMER WSTUBUHON FACdDPS, WRH GROWER PARTIAL RE0.IDllRSFMEN'T FROM OCUS OMER 19389426 12,621 ALL CUSTOMERS WACO RkYLACE My REMACOPROVIDOFrB REPLACEE FEETOFTBARE OIFMSIRUCTURE 220FEET OP 2" STEEO. PIPON 19391050 II,T39 RE OF ALL CUSTOMERS ROUNDROCK TOFOSEJ My RELOCATEDISTR®IInON TE DIOFFACDON WE ICTTON CONFLIR W/PROPOSm FADASASLTOF PROC GONUEST 19391196 j39 WSTAAnONOFPTEA� RE5)EH SMAL EASIO FM -DEVELOPFR IXAETOCID INSTALL®DIs1 ON GROWTH FACD.f TR3 FOR'IHE ECOCOMPANY 19391210 3,666 SYSTFTSIMPROVII.fElTN FlIIDERICKSBU sUETOEO'AN510N Scp AEPUCMON RG DUETOOUSTOMER 19391886 108,150 OUBUTION RE[, C D.1TEi5- ALL CUSTOMERS ALLEN Mry TE ISmO RELOCATEDLSTRESDT CF ICnONTOAVOD CONFLIROJECT OSFD FACD. ARFUMONF PROJECT RECO SIREE[RECONSTRUrnON 19392116 3,081 INSTAL COAO.fERC1AL CLEBURI✓E ION Apr APPW CESFPPEANO DUETfCUSTO DUE TOOUSTOMER U!OOCES-WSTALL D15nOBUHON FACLLCTff3, WJJH GROWTH PARner REO.IBURSEMENTFROM RE UFSTJNGCUSTOAPA 19392946 11,033 SYSTEM ]MPROVEMENIS- ALL CUSTOMERS $HERMAN REPLACE Oct D REPUOGROUN BJFRASIRUCIURE FACM UNDERGROUND FACLLNTIES 19392913 15$22 SYs3EMR OVOI¢NIS- AUCUSTOMERS SHERMAN REPLACE F& REPLACE DE3ERIORATID WFRASTRUCNRE IINDFRGROIJNDFACM= 19392990 WaR PPROVEMINIS- ALLCUSTOM SRFRMAN REPLACE Fcb ACEDETERJORATFD EERGROUNDFACIL= WFRASTRUC U 19393290 4.fl SYS3 PPROVEA)ENIS- COAARACW GREFNVELE SYSTFMFJPANSION J. FORTPICATTONOFCFFSIIE DUETOCUSTOMER IAAD25 (OiSIALL 1,000FEET OF 4' OROW H Pusnc PPE), WHHPAS: A REU011RSE61FNTFROM REOUEST GCUSTOMER 19393950 1,419 RELOCATION OF FACB.HIE9- ALLCUSTOMERS nU5C0 RELOCATIONTOAVOD IW MOCATEDISTRE3=14 CONFLICTWJPROPOSED FAC=ESASARESULTOF PROJECT GOVERNME RE UEST 19394490 6.213 SYS3 U&ROVENIDMS- ALL CUSTOMERS 1FARE.L R CE Feb FEJMACEOETEUORA3ED IWRASTRUC U UNDERGROUND FACH. 19394910 3.939 RETIXE.@IT OF FACMITPB- ALLCUSTOMFAS FORTWORTH COSTSDICURRm DI Ix ABAFIDON335FEETOF4'STPPI. RE[DNJGFACZ= PPETO ALLOW FORNBVI BUBDDD WJTH PAR RE0.IDURSFME mom 19396903 MGM sYsTQAD.PROV@.ffNT3- ALLCUSTOMFRS PFLUGERVELE SYSIEMEPANSION Mu FORIIFICATIONOFOFFSRE DUETOCUSTOMER MADJ3, WTJH PAXM GROWTH REP®IIRSF.SffIPTFROM 19391126 82,155 RELOCATTONOF FACD.ITPS- ALL CIISfOMERS DALLRS RELOCAnONTOAVOD Apr RELOCATEDISTR®IlT10N CONFLICT WJPROPOSED FACE= AS ARFiSULT OF PROTECT PA V W G AND DRADIAGE PROJECT 1939H10 6 COSTEVCIRU2EDWTJH' ALLCUSIOMERS CUSCO COST$DICIIRRm Di l9n REMOVALOFFACE131E9- REfNOJGFAMd ABANDONN5FEETOF3'BARE STEEL. PPE Page 35 of 155 6 11 F -IL ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 37 of 155 DEBCRRTIONOFCO DATAPLAC6D PROTECTS PLACED W GAS WO, UTMT. PROIECP CTD.rtY PLANT W SERVSCE ORCOST0114:IIS I PLART W NOAOER COST RETDIEDDURWG3008 BENEFITRD LOCATION INDIPQ9E OFPR CT g VM 19398350 (1,137) DISTAIAATIONOFPUSAND COEAIERCW BALCHSFEWGS SYSTEM ANSION Aug APPURTENANCES-WSTALL 600 DUETO CUSIOAER FEETOF 2-PLASTICPBE, WITH GAOWIH REIMBIII83E8OINTFROM REQUMTING CUSTOMER 194 WG 34,420 RELOCATIONOFFACD.RES- ALLCUSTOMERS FORTWORTH RELOCATIONTOAVOID J. REI.00ATEDISTREUIION CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FAC=.ASARFSULTOF PROJECT STREETRECONSTRUCIION 19W316G 3,585 INSTALLATIONOFFUMANO COMMER WATAUGA SYSTAI WANSION !m APPURTENANCES-P15I'ALL415 DUETOCUSTOMER =OF3'PLASTICPPE, WRIT GROWTH PARTIAL RED.IDURSEAENTFROM REQUESTING CUSTOMER 191DT430 (1,103) INSTALLATIONOFPIPEAND COA4.0tCW. BRUSITYCREEK SYSTEMEXPANSION Im APPORTENANCFS-INSTALL220 DUBTOCUSTOMER FEETOF 1.35'PI.ASTICPPE,WTDI GROWTH PARTIAL REDrIDURSEME mw TIFSTING CUSTomm 19402630 2,169 GSTALLATIONOFPWSAND CIX.AERCLLL ATHENS SYSIEMEXPANVON Im APPURTENANCES -INSTALL DUETOCUSTOMER DISTREUDONFAC8 . WCIN GROWTH PARTIALRE0.EUR4T.ENTFROM UFSTWGCUSACU 19/02890 3,108 T REI,OCATIWISFFACO.ON ALL CUSTOMERS PLANO RELOGTWIPR VOID Mu RELOCATE ON CONFLIPRCH OPOSED FACRATDS ASA Bffi PAOIECT O SRESULTOF STAFETRECONSIRUCHON 19/03160 3}71 RELOCATEDMT AUB.RES- ALL CUSTOMERS MCKWNEY AELOCATWIPROPVOm Mry RFIOCATEDISTREO130N CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FACASAET OP PROIECI' STORMSEAOCON 190120 1,476 DTALLAMONCFFUEAND COAB.EI4CIAL EV[JG SYSTTOCUSTNSION !m 3]5 DUETRDUSTOb1FR FMTOTENANCSTICPHTALL FEET OF3'PLAF GRONTO 19/09080 1,46] FAME RFIACATION OF FACO.ITE9- ALL CUSTOMERS MANSFB]O RFLOCATIOIOTOAOMD !m RELOCATE CONFLICTOMCT �D TT IFS ASARESULTOF ASAR ULTN PRO/ECI STF STREET TItUC110N 1940]980 8.187 RELOCATnON OFION OF FACO.ITES- ALL CUSTOMERS IANGVEW RELOCATIONTOA Im EOLSIR®UDON COY CONFlICTWIPROMM FACHSASAEULTOF COUNTY) MECT GOI 19413770 7j51 DTXEXnoROF PTE AND COMMPRCW. CORSICANA AF D43TAI.L DUETMEXPANSION DUE D1STFMSTU)NFA DISTRIBUTION FACLLTTES, WITH G]WWTOMER GROWTH PAREBOIURSE6ENt FROM RE Qu CIIT 19414800 1,890 AE ATF A INSTALLATION OFFPIPE AND RESmENIWL LAKE DALLAS SYST�ANSION J. APPURTENANCES -INSTALL DUE TOCUStTOCUSTD DISTSTBUDONFACB,ITIFS, WTIA GROWTH PARTIAL RER.HBnoUm ED'FROM RE UESTWGROF MER 19419330 10534 DRTALLAANCN POEAND CObiMERCW. PARIS SYSITOCU NSIg4 J. APPURTENANCFS-RJSTALL DUETOCOSTOEER TAEU110NFAC0ATIF_4, WRH G ROWTH PARTIAL AEQ.EURSEAENI FROM FA RE OESTING CUSTOMER 1941760G 3,990 �ACATION OF FACB,ITIFS- ALL CUSIO� MIDLOIHNN R Dm ATEDISTRiBUIION NFLICTWIFROPVDm CONFLI PROPOSED FACU FACB.RIFSASARESUUE MO PROTECT T GOVERNMENTAL REQUEST 19419630 1930 SYSTHMCAMCNOFOFT3- ALL CUSTOMERS ARLPIGTON SYSETOCUPANSION IW FFSITE DUETRDWTOM1fER MAJNS UNTALL3F STALL3,2110FEET OF 6' GROWTH Fwmc PLASTIC PEE), WITHPARTTAL T REPIOUR ROM OESCUG cu STOMER o Page 37 of 155 • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 38 of 155 OFCOMPLRTED DATED M PROTECTS FL CED W OAS W GAS DTD.ITY PROJELT Ill]BAITPLANTINSMWCEOR NSTO� PW m NUMBER COST RET PURWG2003 RENEFITED LOCATION PU W01r PROJRCT We"CE 19019860 10,156 SYSTE6T OVEb1ENTS- ALLCUSTOMPES WIUTESBORO REPLACE Feb REPLACEDETERIORATED INFRASTRUCTURE UNDERGROUNDFACdTI0:5 19920MO 68,39) RELOCAHONOFFAC113T]ES- ALL CUSTOMFES FORTWORTH RELOCATION TO AVOID AW RELOCATEDISTIMUTION NNFLICTW/FROPO.SEO FACDITIFSASARESULTOF PROJECT STREE 1942029E 14; ONOSTRUCDON RELMTIONO)56 FFACIAT@S- ALLCUSTOMERS PORT WORTH RELOCATION TOFOO Jw RELOCATEDIBTRESULT NNFLICTOJECT SED FACI3TIFSASARESULi OF PRO]EC[ RUCTION SMOCA 19921810 1,578 ONOF RELOCATEONOEUBUT[ ALL CUSTOMERS ABdENE RELOCATION Mey RFIACATEDISTREi N ROPOSE3 CONFLimW/PROPoSED T FACTLHIESASARESU[ON PROJECT AYSTENI CONS1RUCf10N 199M02G 1),611 ALL CUSTOF4E3 WHIITSRORO REPLACE Feb REMACIIMPROUOMTTS- RFPLACEOUND ]NFRASTRUC[URR ACMM UNDERGROUND FACdif IFS 191M03G 2I2,629 RFIOCATION OF PACEJTIES- ALL CUSTOMERS �ALE RF] Ape RflACATEDISIRESULT CTWITOAVOD CONFLICTWIPROPOSED PROTECT HIGW1E3ASARESU CTIO HION W AY RENNSTRUCI]ON 1913H2O 409 ALL NSTOMFAS WICII'TA FALLS REPLACE J. 371=U.Fr BAMENTS-RETIRE J]1 FEET OF PHARE STID.PIPE INFMSTRUCNRE 19036130 n,170 RELOCATIONOFFACd - ALLNSNIb LONGV RELOCAHONTOAVOD Jw RFlOCATED%S UHON (OREoo CONfticTw/PROPoSEM FAC�ASARESULTOF COUNTY) PROJECT 00VFRNb4? 1%MSG 13,231 RELOCATION OF FACI.ITdS- ALL CUSTOMERS GARLAND RE TIONTOAVOID JW RELOCATEDL4TR®UHCN CONFLICT WJPROPOSED FACD rrm9 AS A RESULT OF PROTECT PAV 10ANDD%UNAGEPROJECT 1942627E 19, RE T[ONOFFACMMES- ALLCUSTOMERS FORTWORTH REL LION TO AVOD J. RE LOCATEDISIR BMON CONnICT W/PROPOSED FACdpT "ARFSULTOF PROJECT STREETRECONSTRUCITON 1%28806 53 RELO UONOFFACWTfE3- ALLCUSTOMERS FORTWORTH RELO MONTOAVOD J. RELOCATEDIS=UTION CONFLICT W/PROPOSED ACDITTESASARPSULTOF PROJECT CUSTOMER VEST 19938866 3,029 DJSTAL MON OF ME AND COMbffR CENTPEPOINI SYSTFAIExpm3ION Od APPURTENANCES-WSTALL (RERRCOUNIM DUEYOCUSTOMER DISTRIRUDON FA ITIS, WITH OROWTH PART W. RE WIRURSFAfENT FROM RE UESTINGNSTObmI 194309/6 48,706 RFJ.00ATIONOFFACB=- ALLCUSTOMERS NUDLOTJOAN RELOCATIONTOAVOD) Rb RELOCATEDJSTR UHON CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FACE.TIIESASARESULTOF PROJECT STORM SEW ER RECONSTRUCTION 19431510 763 WSTALLAHONCFPWEAID RESDENTLU, ORAND� SYSTPMERPANMOH Mer APPURTENANCES-DEVEMOFER DUETOCUSTOMER WSTALLED DlS BUTIM GROWN FACMo PORTHECOMPANY 1903M10 TJ3 INSTALLATION OF P@E AND TAUGA SYSTW EISANSION Sep APPURTENANCES-INSTALLDUETOCUSTONM DIBTR®UDONFACI.RIPSGROWTH 19A3561G )89 WSTALLATION OF F" AND LN PARRDUETOCUSTOMER DISTRUDON FACHdGROWTH 1,788 RELOCA130NOFFACd - HITE t=m�� RELOC TICNTOAYOW JW RELOCATEDISTR®UTONFMENT FACI.N]PSASARESULTOFCUSTOMER UFST 3703G 4.590 SYSIQAd OVENIDNIS- NMS REPLACE Apr REPLACEDEIERIORATFDWFRASTRIICNJRE UNDERGROUND FAMMS Page 38 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DMSION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 39 of 155 DESCR ONOF 0 TED DAIEPSACED PROJECIBPLACMWGAS I wGA6ND,PfY PROJECT UTILRYPL MSE "UOR NSTOMERS P w NO m COSF RETMDDU G20a3 BENEFI[ED IACATWN PDRPOSEOFPROJECT SFB m 1"3935G 10,174 SYSTEM OVEMENS- ALLNSTOMERS TEMCOLONY REPLACE My REPLACE UNDERGRW D9FRASDtUCNRE 19439830 1,547 wSTALLATON OF PIPE AND RFSD)ENTIAL MANffDEA SYSTEM EXPANSION J. APPURTINANCES-DEVELOPER DUETOCUSTOMER wSTALLED DISTA®UIION GROWTH FACRSHFSFORTHECOMPANY 1%3993G 7,032 SYSTF IMPROVEMENTS- All CUSTOMERS BRO "ORO REPLACE Jm REPLACE DEIEIUORAIID DBAASTRUCNRE UNDEROROUNDFACUTIE3 19441250 6,129 RELOCAT[ONOFFACR,IT ALLCUSTOMFAS DENTON REIA TIONTOAV= J. RELOCATEDISIR® ON CONELICTWIPAOPOSED FACOAT MARFSN-TOF PROJECT DEVELOPERRE UEST 1m" m 5,1% RESmEN[W. Ro SYSTEM EXPANSION Jm -DJSTALL DIJETONSTOMERTRD3UTION IT�n�oFp@EAND FACDJT63, WRIT GROWTHTIAL RE05�URSEMENr £ROM G CUSFOMERS 19""60 (3,101) MSTALLATIONOFPDRAND COLAII-RCW. KIlLEEN SYSIEMEXPAN90N J. APPURTENANCES -wnT 1,"5 DUETOCUSTOMER FF£TOP3'PLASIICPIPF, WRN GROWTH REQ./BIJILSFb1ENTFROM RE Two CUsmO 19/45380 3,456 RFSACATJONOFFACBJTIFS- ALLCIISTOM£RS BRUSNYCREEICC RELOCATIONTOAVO03 My RELOCATEDL5TRD3UTION C ICTWIPROPO4E0 FACOJT MARRSULTOF PROJECT CUSTOMER T 19"7190 17,068 SYSTFMw1PROVEMENIS- ALLCUSTOMFRS $HERMAN REPLACE lm REPLACEDETERIORAT wFRASTRUCNRE UNDEROROU FACRITJPS 19"3]00 ",425 R MATONOFFACRITIEB- ALL CUSTOMERS MCXINNEY RELOCATIONTOAWM Fd RELOCATEDISTR ON COIDLICFW/PROPOSED FACHSIWS AS A RESULT OF PROJECT STORMDR PROJECT 1wmo I0A75 MTA1 MONOFPME COFAIER DENTON SYSFBM EJ(PAN810N J. APPURTENANCEt-wSTALL DUETDCIJSTObffIl DJSTRIB[IIIONFACDJTN$ W[TH GROW" PARTIAL RETMBURSEMENTFROM UESIwOOUSTO� 1"50900 188 R£LOCATIONOFFACRJTIES- ALL CIISTOMFRS I.EwISVD.LE RELOCATIONTOAVOm My RELOCAlEDLS1RIBUDONCONFLICT WI PAOFOSED FACBJT@SAS ARESULT OF ROAD PAOJECJ RECONSTRUCTION 19452260 14,782 SYSTEM 0.1PROVENIEM'3- ALL NSTOMERS FORT WORTH REPLACE lm REPLACEDEIERIORAIPD wFRpsIRUC[URE UNDERGROUND £ACO,TiIF3 19/53210 BySJ wSTALLATION OF COAAffRCW. MURPHY SYSI'EMEXPANSION Mer mBR APPURTENANTALL DUE TOCUSTOA¢R DISTRIBUIIONFACILFACRTI'ffS, GROWTH PARTIJU. REDiBURSEAf EwT mo FROM UESTOIG CUSTOEffII 1"STOW 4,79I SYSTEM➢.BROVEMENPB ALLCUSI'OMFRS ADB.ENE REPLACE Jm REPLACE300£f£IOF3'BARE DIFMSTRUCRIRE =PIPE300FEETOF 3• 1 913"Op (156) NW RELOCATIONOFFA�- ALLCUSTOEffR3 GLIw ROSE RELOCATION TOAVOII3 Im RFlOGTEDLSTRJBUHON CONFLICT w/PROPOSED FACR.RIE9ASAREAnM PROJECT DRAWPT[ONS 19/51626 25,6]1 FLLATION R£ YOCATIONOFFACDON ALL Cl1STOMERs MCKDA�Y RELOCAIIONTOA Feb AALOCATEDLSTR03UIION CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FACRITM aS A R PROTECT SIREI?r RECO UMONF 1"SITJG (]) OFPCr10N wSTALLATION OF PD'E AND RESmENi1AL GPEEISVO.LE MEXPANSION J. APPURTENANCES-w3TALL 190 DY DUE TONSTObIDt I FEE[OF E•PLAS]TC PBE GROWTH Page 39 of 155 .I L • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 40 of 155 D�QNUF.SIJW DAU FIA B PROIeCPS PLACED IN GAS pGAS DSBIPY PROSECT UTDJTYPLA WSERVICEOR NSTOMERS PLgNr DI NUMBER COSI "WRIE.D DURING 3061 BRNERRED I.00ATTON PURPOSBOFPROIBLT SERYICR 194MM 7,680 INSTALLATIONOFPIPEANO CObIDPB COPPELL sYSTFMERPANSION 1m APPURTENANCES -INSTALL DUETONSTOMER D15TR®U NFACII=S.WITH GROWTH PART W, RED.ffiURSF].ffNI FROM NSTOMER 1945653G 6,000 SYSTEM IMVSD EM s- ALL NSTOMERS SIm04AN REPLACE 1m REPLACEDETERIORATEO 1NFRAS'IRL'CIIIRE UNDERGROUND FACILITIES I9456670 6,713 INSTALLATI N COMRIDtCLV. OLNEY SYSTFMERPANSION ai APP Ims-MST DUETO COSTOMPR Wrl`LC CFSTALL345 FEETOF T PLASTIC PPE, WTDI GROWTH PARTIAL REJRMURSE6@N[ FROM IREO�G NSTOMER 19457776 (7) WSTALLATION OPMSTA RFSIDINIlA1 SULP11Gs SYIETOEPANSION Jm APSTFLIB ANCFS-QIMSA SPRINGS OiIENNSTOMER DISTRIBUOONFACdIiPS, WITH GRDWM PARrW.�URS)& RT FROM TING CUSTOMER 19/58626 56,110 RIRgCAr10N O£FACdIT]E5- ALL NSTOMERS MESQUITE RELOCAHON TO AVOID Aug RflACAl®UIION CONFLICIWJPRC@OSED FACRITIESAs SASA wRBSULi OF PROJECT DePR OJEcr 1 9459956 9,2M YSMM SACEIPROVE8IENIS- ALL NSJOAPRS ROCY.DALE REPLACE Aug REPLACE 100 FEET OF ES WFRASTRUCRIRE 4 -PL PPE WCIH IOOFEETOF4'PLASHC 19460556 103.756 ALL CUS'[OEOtS WACO SYSTw(Al NSION Sep FOXWI TIOVEA0il3- FORTPICATION OFOFFSIIE DUE ]'ONBT01.4R MADYS(INST). GROWTH wfOpmmLF6' PLASTIC PPE7, WHHPARTW. REU.BIURSEh4NTFROM REQ=rIWNSTOhIDt 19460]!6 4),009 RELOCATEDOF ALL NSTOMFR$ FOAT WORTH OID AW ZTRIACU.TfPS- RELOCATEDISTR®UUON COM+LImW/PROPOSED lmwlmo FACUSDEIASARESULT JIUcof PROJECT' STOI M U 19/60860 11,]U IIPIRECONSTRUCDON DJSTALLATION OF PPE AND COhA1FRCW. CARROLLTON SYSTEM E)PANSION Im APPURTENANCFAM111MI DUETONSTONER DISTR®UTION FACdIIPS, WITH GROWTH PARTW. RER.IDURSERffNI FROM UFSTlmmlto TOAPR 19/60930 )9,400 8150=01'10 ALL CUSTOMERS DALLAS REPLACe Mu IUMA REPLACB ISOFE DPRASTRUCL6RE mll WRAPPED STEEL PPeE 160 FEET OF IO'STEELPPE 19461SIG 58.751 RELOCATIONOFFA(=IES- ALL7 MARLLN RELOCATIONTOAWW AW RELOCATEDISTRIBIITEW CONFLICTWIPROPOSED FACOlLPSASARFSULTOF PROJECT MGHWAYRFLONSTRU CQ,l 19961920 (1,018) RELOCAFION OF FACB.RPS- AJLNSTOMERS MCRDIFffiY RELOCATIONTOAVOW FM RELOCATE DIeIRIRVHCN CONFl.ICI WIPROPoslm FA=I]ESASARESULTOF PROTECT GUsI'OAfflt UEST 19163356 561 MSTALLATIGN OF PPE AND COM6PR ARLWOTON SYSTEMEXPANSION J. APPURTENANCES -INSTALL 100 DUeNCUSTOMER FEETOF 4' PLASDCPPE, IM' GROWTH SERVICE SNB, Alm METER, PARTEV.AEB6B6RSD.PNSFHOUROM CUSTOMER 1916/310 31,9fi6 RELOCAHONOFFAC4dTPS- ALL NSTOMERS GRAIm PRAQtP RELOCATION TO AVOID Ale RFIACATEDIRTR®UIION NNFLICT WIPROPoSED FACRITPSASAR1Ls111.r OF PROTECT SIONSIRUCOON 19161AG 1,518 INSTALLASTALLAHONOF PIPEAND RFSIDENIW. NMR¢RCE SYSET0£1 Im IA]SR DUElROS DISTRTENANCES-UISTALL DISTRIBOTION£ACB.TTPS 6ROWDi ...ER Page 40 of 155 C c CJ ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 41 of 155 DFS KJON m UO MUPLACEO PROJECTS PLACED M GAS NG DTRdlY PROJECT UT➢.R FP NSERW6 OR N6TOABUIS PLANTN NUMBER COSF REARED DURNG 20m BENEFITED L UON PURPOSE OF PROAECF SERVICE 19465020 12,338 RELOCATIONOFFACJLHNS- ALL NSTOMFRS MANS D RELOCATIONTOAWID Apr RELOCATEDISTR®UTION CONFWCT W/PROPOSED FACdT11FSASARESULTOF PROJECT STREET RECONSTRUCTION 19465/60 1,501 SYSIEMNPROVEMINTS- ALLCUSTOLD]tS ROCKDALE REPLACE Jm RFJ'LACEDETERIORATFJ3 NERAS'TRIICTURE UNDERGROUND FAM=S 19469080 234,012 NSTALLAMONOFPME ALL N5roLffR1 CmARPARE FORTIFICATKMOR Nov APPURTENANCES-NSTALL3,000 SYSTEMIMPROVEMENT =OF6-PLASDCPIPEBY DDtECRONALBORE 194085G 7,495 SYSTEMR4ROVEb1EM5- ALLCUSTOLIERI XE MLE REPLACE Sep REPLACE DETJRIORATED 06RASTRUCNRE UNDERGROUND FACLLIITFS 195/2190 346 COSTNCURREOWN31TID3 ALL CUSTONIFRS ADDWN COSTS NCURREDN Feb REMOVAL OF FACLLITIES-CAP RETBm4G FACLLTJffi AND ABANDON DISTRIBUTION 1945516(3 1,053 NSTAL nONOFPTPEAND COMMER ALLEN SYSTEM EXPANMON Aug APPURTENANCES-NSTALL DUETONSFOMER DISTR =MFACDSTRS,WITS GROWTH PARTW.RERA3URSEhff TFROM NSTOb1ER 1%nnG (2G RELOCATION OF FAM=- ALLCIISTObiFRS GREENVBJ.E RELOCAMONMAVOM J. RECOCATEDISHtIDUT10N CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FACLLTRESASARFSULTOF PROJECT GOVERNb1ENTAL UESf 194TIOG 3,164 NSTe AMONOFPPEAND RFSmENTW. BLOgvm4G SYETFM FJ(PANSION Feb APPURTENANCES-NSTALL GROVE DUEro NSi061F2f DMTRIBUTIONFACD.ITD:. WTIiT Ot oO PAR REPffiUR9Q+LLITTFRIT.T REQ�G NSMM 194)30)0 8,808 RELOCATIONOFFACBJTRS- ALL NSTOMERS XERRVRLE RELOCATIONTOAWM OG RELOCATIIMSTI®=ON COFDIICTWI PROPOSED FACBJIIESASARESULTOF EASEMENTISSUF4 PROJECT 19433560 12,170 NSTALLATIONOFPBRAMJ NMM.PRCIAL Mt o sYSTFAf EXPANSION AF APPURTENANCES -INSTALL DMWMMro NSTR®IJDON FACB.ITDiS, W GROWTH PARHAL RED.mURSEMENT FROM UFSTING NSION 19175910 5,6>3 RELOCAGONOFFACLL=- ALLNSTOMPRS SANANGELO RELOCATIONTOAV My RELOCATEDISTRNUTJON CONFWCTWIPROPOSED FACRJJIESASARESULTOF PROJECT CI1SroEfER UEST 19473990 491 RELOCATIONOFFACLLIT@S- ALL NSIOMERS SNYDER RELOCATR3N TOAVOm Jao RELOCAlEDISTR®US10N CONFLICT W/PROPoSED OF PROJECT MSTOTIE.SASARESULT sro IIFST 194)6)IG 4,281 RFLOCATI DNOFFACBd1TPS- Tt ALL NSmb1FR4 KELLER RELOCATIONmomV leo EDISIR®VflON CONi1.IRWIPROPoSED FAOL FACE ASARFPRL PROJECT D sroRMDRA 199M>3G 339.114 OFFAROIECT RELOCAlIONOFFACR.RIES- ALL NSIY3MER5 DALLAS RI].OGTIW/mmO Aug RFtOCATEDT3TR®UHON CONFLICT W/PROPoSm FACD.ITIES AS ARESULTOF PROJECT' PAVING ANO ORANAGE PROJECT 3,0'13 INSTALLATIONOFPWEAND RESIDENTIAL FORTWORTH SYSTE)4EXPANSTON Fd NSTALL DUETONSTO DIST =ONFACLLIT WTDI GROWTH P94670, 2,264 RFLOCATIOFIOFFACLLITIFS- ALL CIISroMER3 BRYAN RELOCATlmmO Feb RF2ACA)EDIITRIBUDON CONFLICT w/PROPoSm FACLLITffSASA RESULT OF SEWERPROIECC PROJECT Page 41 of 155 • C ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF RUNG PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 42 of 155 FSCRbM OF COMPLETED DATE PLICFD PROMMPLACED W GAS W GA8IR.IT DY PROJECT 3nDdiYPLANTWSERVIOOR OSTOMERS PIANTW NU11mER COST RETIRED DURWG 3883 RENEFTTED LOCATION PURPOSE Of FROJECF 6SVICa 190]88)O SYSTEM DISOVEMENTS- ALL CUSTOM1ffRS DALLAS SY5TFMEXPAFMON Apt FORMCAT10N OF OFFS DUETOOSTObfeR MAINS (INSTALL 5• FLAsmc PB% GROWTH W RH PART W. RED.iBiJRSEA�t1T FROMRE mmocuSTOb 19085810 SYSTEM OVEMFMS- ALL CUMMM HOME REPLACE Jm F3,4429 REPLAMD=IUORATTD INFRASTRUC UNDERGROUND FACD.TRFS 1"mo RELOCAMONOFFACRJTDB- ALLCUSTOMFRS M2 G RFLOC UONTOAVOTD J. RELOCAMDJST MON CONFLICTWImoF FACOdTtFSASAREULTOF PROJECTSTORM DRAW WSTALLATJON INH6330 SYSTEM RIPROVET¢NJS- ALL OSTOMFRS DEMON REPLACE J. REPLACE DETERIORATED WFRASTItUCI'URE UNDFRGROIJNDFACIL� 190MS1G 38,017 RFLO ONOFFACE=- ALLCOSTOMERS CARROLLTON RJ10CAnONTOAVOM Jm RELOCATE DISJRWU ION cONFLICIWJPROPOSED FACG3nESASARPSULTOF PROJECT GOVERJA4NTAL MUSSG 13,113 RFLOCAnONOFFACG.RIFS- ALLCUSTOMERS DUNCANVRLB RF].00ATIONTOAVOID Oa RFLOCATEDJSTRI om CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FAL•WTD3ASARESULTOF PROJECT STWWSA 19576 ISj WnAUAnN ONMAND COLGE XANSION JW ANE- W�ALL 350 SATION DUETOO EOF6nnFUSM10' GROWTH STEEL CAS W G AND 388 FIAT OF 2' PLASnC P@E, WTIH PARTW, REQ.iBURSEMIWTFROM REQMTINQ CUSTOMER 19/88560 3,691 WSTALLAnON OFPBE AND RFSo701DAL DENISON SYSTE N510N JW APPURTENANCE- WSTALL DUE TOIUOSTSTOMS DISTRGIUJIONFACG.I'I'tES.blT GROW[H PARTIAL REOBBURSEOIDTT FROM UESTDIG O 19088850 10.13] OF F L Rd TEDIS ALL CUSTObiF]tS DUNCAM'i1.LE RELOCAnONTOAVOID JW UC ONS- RELOGTEDISTRIRUnON CONFWCT WJPROPOSED FACEnIEA3ARE3LWTOF PROJECT OSTOMA UET 190898)0 5,713 nON OF OMMSCWL OSURNE EXPANSION Jw MSTALO APPURTENANCE- WSTALL APFURT DUETOOSTObffR Dutra BUIIONFACGdTAS,WITH GRO WTH PART W, REGABURSEMEM F0.0M PAKn RE UETWGOSIOI.4lt 19/90036 2j93 SYSTEM U ALL CUSTObORS 6RFFWVG.LE REPLACE J. E=0RAMS- FEPLAa ATE= GJFRASTRUCNRE UNDS EROROUFlDFA 191912)0 3269 AnOR)FFIPEAb4 WSUALLATION OF AND COMMERCJAL BURKBURNETT SYSTEMEXPANSION J. MS APPURFENA WSTALL85 DUE "TOOSTOMS PEETOF 2" PLASTICPPE, n GROWTH m PARTIAL RED.SRURffi.GiNNi FROM OF4R CF 19091626 13],593 RELOCATONOFFACG.ITIE- F ALL OSTOMERS FORT WORTH RELOCAnONTOAVOW JW RELOCATE DISAIBIRJON CONFLICT WJSOPOS® FACD.n1F3ASA RESULTOF PROTECT S'TSTAL REONOFPMION 19992966 1,630 AnON OPPEE COFAffRCW- FORNEY SYSTFAIEXPANSM Feb LO APPURTENANCE -DEVELOPS APPM DUE WSTALLED2 OAN MOVffHMS GROWTH FORCOI PANY PLASIIAnON 19/93196 388 OF FAC ALL CUSTOMERS HURST RSO=W/POAVOID Nw MOCAnONOFFUTIORS- RFLOCATSASAMULTN CONFLI FACR.1'IIESASAREULT OF PROTECT PRO= OffMAL VEST 19/95060 SSp51 RELOCEI=A ONOFFACG.CfIE3- ALL OSTORiFAS FORT WORTH RELOCATIONTOAVOW Feb RFLOCATEDIS NNFLICTWJPROPOSEO FACG.InEA3ARAIU TONF PROJECT UMMU STREETRECONSTRUCfION Page 42 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 43 of 155 DEIWHJEFIIONOFCOMPLELED DAM pw PROJECTS PLACED DW GAS p Ogg NR,RY PROJECT UTRdTYPLA WSMWCEOR CUSTOMERS I PIwNTQ! NUMBER COST REDREDDUROTG3(01 BENEFITED TACTION PORPOSEOFPROJECT SERVICE 19495166 25,"4 RFL n()NOFFA�- ALLCUS )MtS ILU.TOM= RELOCATIMMAVOID Sep SMOCATEDISTR®UTON CONFMCTW/PROPOSED FACOAT@SASARESULTOF PROTECT STREETRECONSTRUCRON 1949753G (370) sysmI iFItOVEMENis- ALLCUSTOMER.S VALLEYb s INSTALLATIONOR Im REPLACE THREE DLSTRICI (ROSQUE REPLACEF4T.T OF REOULATORSTATON$ REGULATION 19498196 4,306 RELOCATONOFFACDJTES- ALLCUSTOMERS IMIULMLE RELOCATONTOAVOID Sep RELOCATEOISIRIB TON CONFLICT WI PROPOS® FACO.T[RS ASA RFSULi OF PROTECT LusroMER 19/98136 1,154 UPI ATOM OFWSTA QDM8fE1MLLL PARIS SYSIFMEWANSION Sep APFM APPURTENANCFS-D15TALL DUE T A1ER DL3TR®UDON FAC61TTR4, GROWTH GIUO o PARTLV. RER.IDURSELf ENT FROM m REQUES'TIONOFFIOA4R 19498936 b,]23 RELOCATONOFFACRJTffS- ALL CUSTOMERS FJARVE.LE RFLOCATON TO AVOID Sep RELOCATSTR CONFLICT WIPROPOSm F FS ASASAR=E9ULT OF PROTECT STO CUSTONFR REQ= 1949945(5 34,661 RFLOGITONOFFACO.TTIB9- ALL N6TOLDR$ FORT WORTH RELOGTONTOAVOID Im RFIACAIEDISAMMTN COtD11CTPROPOSIID FACILWTT¢S AS ARFSULTOF PROTECT STRJEMBECOMMIXTION 19300596 3,285 DISTALLATON OF FI`UllWSTA RESIDENTIAL. GREENVR.LE SYSTEME%PANSION Im APPURIENANCFS- FALL430 DUE TOCU5T06hR PI FIFT'OF 3'PLASTICPBE, GROWTH PARTIAL RPLVIDURgE6f ENT m FROM VESTING 193006IG 21,395 D93TALLATON OF OFFIIFE PBEAND ALL NSTOMFRS ABIlEI4E FORT1FiCATON OR J. APPURTENANCES -OW 160 SYSTEM II.4ROVEME6TT FEETOF 4• TO P@Els IUPC CONNECTONOFF1G MAD15 19301306 3,116 RELOGTON OF FAC61]IFS- All CUSTOMFRs FORT WORTH RELOCATON JW FELOCAIEDLSIR CONFLICT WIPROPOSEU` s® ESUT FACO.TT�3 ASARESIILT OF PRO= SPRFPTRECON$'IRUCTON 19503166 1,Y08 SYSIFM MSROVFAfEN19- ALL CUSTOMERS MCGREGOR REPLACE Mar REPWCE50 FEET OF I' WRAPPED MFRnSTRUCNRE SfEEi.P SOEEET OF 2" 195090 13,680 SYIIBdFIIO - ANSOM OGESBY R My ACIWFIMTOF<ER DFA!imuC STETLCP AF1199FEETOF4' PLASTCPWOFF EI FEET OF 3• 1950/246 IIA]90 RFL ALL CUSTOMERS d.®URNR C=ON]DAVSW Oct TIRD]OFFACD.TTIFS- FFI.00ATS cal CONFLICT W/PROPOSED ASTR®UIION ASISTFLU PROJECT STR=3ES ON STREETRECONSTITUCIION 1930/306 6a98 COMW CORSIN ERPNSION FM UE-DST DMTO DIS®MFAMES,WIM GROWElf PARVRMIBMmoiM ,REQEMSTOM 195170 81,400 LATON OF FA6ITOSS- ALL NSTOMFRS DALLAS RF]ACATONTOMSIM Aug RELOCATEDIS-TRIG CONFLICCW/PROPOSm MT TTff.S ASARFU=ONF PROJECT STRJ STREET REION IPE 19504486 6,074 OF DWSTAMIM(MFP145TNL RESIDENTIAL ROIVE SYSTEMPJTPANSION Feb APPURTETIONFA- DUETOOUSTI IMS.L DISTR®UIIONFACD.TT�S, WITH GROWDI W. ffiSEA�6TTFROM i(i CUSTOMER REQ1VESTING 19501650 10,405 RFLOCATON OF FACdI'TOiS- AI.L CUSTOMERS DALLAS REFnFLl ONTOAVOID Tm FF10CAiSASTRJESMT CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FAO.CT�S AS A RFSULTU PROJECT STORM SEWER RECONSTRUCTION Page 43 of 155 rIL • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 44 of 155 DESCA NOF OeBLETED mmP1„6® PROJECSS PLACED M GAS M GA& IRd1TY PROSECT IJTR.TTYPL NMRVICEOR NSTOMERS PLWTM NUDSBER COST RETRIED DURMG 2063 BENEFITED LOCATION PURPOSEOFPROJBCT SFAVICE 19506056 11,086 1NSTALLATIONOFP@EANO COMMERCIAL NOR' SYSTEAI EXPANSION lee APPURTENANCES-WSTALL R1C1B. DUETOCUSTOMER DISTRTBUnON FACILR HE.LS GROWTH 1950046 32,906 SYSTEMPPROVEbIDTT3- ALL CUSTOS A JNGTON SYSIEMEBPANSION AX FORMCATION OF OFFSETS DIMMMSTOMFR MAINSONSI'ALL 6'PLASTIC PPl7, GROWTH PARTIALAED.®IIRSEMENT FROM IIF.SiTIJGCUSTOMER MO 19308806 38,TT0 STSAF ALL CUSTOMERS GEORGE[OWN REPLACE leo 30R 0]FeS- 30ON FOF 6' STEELPPE REST. MFRASTRI (9509086 969 L D MSTALLATION OF COMMERCLV. IJIIBBARD MSIO SYSTFMERPANSION Feb WSTE APPfIRTENANCFS.INBTALL DOE TUCUST01.7ER MSTA®IITIONFACRHIFS, WITH OAOWIN PARTIALR GMIASEB®iTFROM UESTMG CUSTOEDR 19509310 &699 BYShM PPROVEMENTS- ALL CUSTOMERS ALLEN FORTPICAnONOR Iw V REGULAIO SYS TETSIMPROVQ.ffNr INST SI MSTALL REPIACEhm1'I SPOOL; REP LACE TVRBTNE METER WIIIIA 3TSLB.CASE 19511166 8,133 INSTALLAnON OF PPE AND RESmPMTL1L MESOIRIB sySTEMMANRON Ju APPIBtTENM`CE9-INSrAM. MIE TOCUSTOb1MER DISTRIBUTION FACB.ITIES GROWR}i 19511830 157,'!01 RELOCATIONOFFACO.R ALLCUSTObffR4 GAM MLE RE T[ONTOAVOM Dec RFLOCATEDiSFRIB=W CONFLICTWIPROPOS ACILHPSASARESUI.TOF PROTEGE STREETRECONSTAUCTION 19512296 21,688 RFLOCAnONOFFAC6TTP3- ALL CUSFOMFRS MR o MMATIMTOAVOM My RFLOCATEDISTRIBUTTON CONFLICT w/PROPOSED AC6IT MARLSULTOF PROJECY GOVFJMMENFALRE T 19513330 11,813 SYSTEM OPROVFMENTS- ALL CUSTOMERS BANGER REPLACE Oct REPLACE DEIFRIORATFJ3 MFRASTRUCTIIRE UNDERGROUND FAC ]Mi I"IN6 23,885 REL TIMOFFACILITP3- ALLCUST08 FORTWORTN RE10 TKAITOAVOM J. RELOCATEMSIRTBUTION COtOLICFW/PROPOSED FACDPF MARESULTOP PROJECT WATFASEEPAGEMTOPPE 19512AG 13,062 STSTEMW OVEbffiNTS- ALL CUSTOMERS ABILENE REPLACE Feb RFP3ACE350=0F4"BARE MFlUSIRUCJURE STFF FMWTIN230FEETOF4' 19513896 16,835 TFMPPROVEMENTS- ALLCUSTOMERS ABU.ENE REPLACE Feb LACE 599 FEST OP C BARE INPPASFRUCTIJRE PPE.1STFEETOFC ITIRONMEWITH5XFTI;TOF STIC PIPE, AN031 FEETOF 6• 19514396 (2,M5) MTA T[ON OF PPE AND COMMERCW GEORGETOWN SYSI IWANSION My APPURTENANCES-MSTALL 4W DIIETOCUSTOb1ER FEETOPYPLASTICPPE, W GROW REN93URSFAfENFFROM IM UFSTM6 WSTObIDi 195160 (1,358) SY5IFM B.WROVEMENTB- COM1AIDt LEA M SYSTEM MANSION MY FORME TION OF MSM DUETOWSTOMER MAMS(MSTAW.6'PLASTICPPEA GROWTH WON PARTIAL RE0.IDURSFT.PlrT FROM IIF3TD1000S 1951/3063,M SYS]EMD.EMS- ACL CUSTOMERS IFDPLE REPLACE lee REPLACE50FEE[ =013'BAAE MFRASIRUCTIIRE STEEL PPE WITH 500 FEEF OF 3• i951500G I7)95 SYSTEM TMPROVENQMYS- ALL CUSIOM1ffAS ABd@18 REPLACE J. REPLACE253F MFRASTRUCIURE 4.OPCASTBION PPF,59FEETOP4'CAST T[ PPE, AND 4 PP33r of 4• eusnc PIPE tV1111 PLASTIC MAINS Page 44 of 155 CJ 11 ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 45 of 156 DFS o mm PLA¢D PROl pumwGAS wGASDID.ITY PROIiGT Ul1LITY PUNTw SERVICE ox COSLOMExS NUMBER COSI' R DURING 3002 BFJIEP-IED 1ACwnON PURPOSE OF PRSION SERWm 5 19516910 2�9] MON INSiALunON OF PREAND COSAfb]tCW. CELwA $YSTEMEXPAN316N J. J. APPURTENANCFS-DIS-S, DUETOOUSrobwR DISiR®UnONFACE.ITffS, WRH GROWTH AATLLL. RF3MBIRISEbfEF--FROM RE UFSTwG CL5T080'-A 1931]090 1,0)6 COSTWURRED WRH n@ ALL CUSTOMERS CLYDE COSTSwCURREDw Feb AEMO PACROIES- REMOV REfRtDIG FAC6ITIES AE Nn 2' ED STMLFW WRAPPED STEEL PbE 19318090 15,399 wSTALu110N OE CObAfERC1AL FORT WORTH STSTFAIFSIPANMER Fd AISU WSTA DUE TOOUSTOMER D15TR®UTION FACE.ITIE3, IQTANCEE- IMSA GROWTH Pa PA RE04BURSAtFNTFROM 11ESTINO CUSIIX.ik]f m 1%18MG 80 iB ALL CUSTObffRS BLANKS[ REFUGE Jm M STID. m"CENOFETTOI ]NFRASIItULTURE FIMOFBARE PTE FEE -OF 1.75' PPE R3 m ] PR SYSTETA e.1PR0V0.tIItIS- ALL CUSTObfEAS COLLEGE wSrALunON OR J. REPLACE TW03`OROVEFLE%PLO STAnON RIO'LACEBOF AE6uLATou wrtx r TE 9a9 RecuLAnwnoN GROVERFTORS E MGN( 1931%IG 9j07 w3TALuT[ONnON OP P]MAND COFR.fEIiCW. WOLFS CITY SYSIEME%PANSBON J. DUEG OUSIOMER = OFFSIANCE9-D85GLL%5 103 FFEf FEE -OF 3snc GROWTH MCe opz^eusnc eo AND F4lER 19319986 3,630 SYS-EM0.fl]F NrS- ALL CUSTObffiIS WACO REPLACE FM REPLACE 10 FEE=TO2"STEELE wfRASIRUCNRE WON IO FEE -OF 3` PLASnC PDFR 19520140 16,829 SYSIACEDROVEMTMS ALL CUSTOMERS BONHAM REPuCE Feb REPLACEDEIERIORATID DIFRASIRUCfUAE UNDERGROUND FACRRR$ 19530330 1,186 SYSIEMIMPROVEMENTS- ALL CUSTOMERS WAXAIIACEDii REPLACE Im REPLACE 1I FEE -OF T STEELPGR INFRASIItUCIllRE W --H 14FEE-OF2'PLASIIC PIPE 195216/0 13,392 SYS�IMPROVEMEN-S- ALL GUS-ObffiltS PALESTINE REFUGE My DE INFRAS3RUCHIRE DIMG FAR 1926 963 wSTuTIONOPEA RE9IDENHAL BURKBURNEIT STSIEMEJSANSION !m APPURTENAN iI DUETROWT11 ER TICFIIFE FFE[OFTPLASnC Free GROWTH I9531170 13,807 SYSIE VFMFNIS- ALLCUSIOM1OAS ABE.EF� REPu¢ Im EI95 E 195 FEE -OF 4` CAST 1NERA3'IRUC[URE IRMFI OF 4' NncEANWTTlII"= pl PMOCA PER W --N 19] FEE -OF t" 19514616 2.123 RELO ALL CUS-IX.RRS CLE031RNE REL Dm TEDOFFACO.ON RELOCAYEDISAR Icrw/TOPOMD CONFLICC W/PR�OSED T FACE -TIES ASARESULr OF PROIEC- GOVERNMENTAL 195396/0 1.913 ESSTALLAnON OF PR'S AND COMMERCW. LONGV03Y! SYSTEMEJ@ANSION Ar APPUR]NCE4-w3IALL COREGG DUE TOOffR DIS]R®UMON FACGIITES,W-1H COUNTY) GROWTH AR'ML RE0.IDllR3ETff NiFRW RE UESTIO14OF TOAffIt 1952T11G 1,903 RELO OF ALL CUSTOM1IDiS ARLwOnlil RELOCCTW OAWID Jm MDI IBC O@4- RFIOCATEDLSA ULT CONFL[MONCTOPOSED FACD.RIFS ASA OF FIRE PROR:C- FIIST A TION 1%2%16 5,069 TEI.00AnON wS-ALur10N OFPBEAND RESE)EN'ML TEl8RE2L SYSTEMEKPANSION FM APPURTENANCE 100 DUE IUOW111 R CPH`ALL FEET OP 3"PLASTIC PBE OROWIN 195381/6 6,738 RELOGTION OF FACLLRGS- ALL CUS'[OMER9 BRYAN RELOCAnONTOAVOD) Feb RELOCATEOISTR®IRION COIff awl PROPOSED FACD.Ir05ASARFSULTOF pRO/ELT SGUETRECONSTRUCHON 19330$10 4j0 WnALLATIONOFPERAND RESE)ENI'W. FORNEY SYSTEMEKPA sm IW APPURTENANCES-EVSTALL DUETONSTOA4rf DISMBIJTI NFACR.ITIEiS oROW-R Page 45 of 156 • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 46 of 155 F COMPUTED DA]EP m PROAm PLACED p GAS p GASUIMY lmlt r UFHPP FP NSERVICEOR =01I Op vlwNrp NOR®RH COSF RETDKED DURU:G SOW BFlO.FRED LOCATION PIIRPOSEOFPROIEC£ SERWLi 1%309X3 16,323 SYSTEM D.JPROVEMENTS- ALLCUSmmb llo E REPLACE lm REPLACE DE=UOMA PORASTRUCIURE U)IDMGROUND FAM= 1953113G 5,537 RELOCATIONOFFACD.=- ALL CUS'rotM-]t5 DALLAS lmrr ATION OR Jm RELOGTE DLSTRICTREGULATOR IUMACEMENTOF STATIONTOABOV HOUND biFASUREMEtO'OR LOCATION REGULATION I"W2G 1)10 SYSTmi APROV5iE4AT5- ALL CUSTOMERS ROSCOE COSTS pCUR N lm ABANDON53=01`TBARE RET 5FAC FFR S]1TR.PD AND37FRETOF3' BAREST POEANDOISFALL1 F'OOTOFYPL MCPPE 1035530 4,350 INSTALLATIONOFFU'EAND RES83bHTW. A OMN SYSTEM EKPANSION Lb APPURTENANCES-WSTALL DUE TO NSTOhPR DBTR®UTION FAC .WIT11 GROWFH SE FROM PEQm iGO CUs UFSTING TOMHT[ 1035956 1,676 pSTALLlT OF RESB)ENTIAL WICHITA FALLS SU!37OF3OANSION J. APPURTENANCE4- NSTA DueroCUST081ER PBEFOF i'PI.ASIICPBE, PlFr4WFFFI OAOWIH M PARTW.R EAOM RE UE aI=rSET.B]lf 19535980 5,810 "FIONOFFOMFA pSTALDtAFI OF COAAffRCW. DALLAS SU13TDCUSTO ON Je9 WSTA L APP ALL DUE'RROWFFI ER UEIITFANCES-MU DISTRR3UTION£ACB.RIES, WPIH GROWTH PAIREOMFIE@O3URSEMENLFROM UBST3FIG OMFR 19532506 1.118 COMI.ffRCW. CEDARPARK DuIlToEIOANSIONA DUE TOCUSTOMER �MT�ATIONOFPIP13MID.NSTL OF:;-ANCES-pSrN,L PBETOF3'PLASTICPB$ GROWTH FR PARTJALREH4BUFOE FRIX4 UFST4IGNSTOMER 1%32946 11,618 SYSiEMA1PR0VE ALL CUSTOMERS BRYAN REPLACE Mu REPLACE l00 OFV FE1T OF 4' BARB INFRASTRUCNRE STEEL. PH'E 1%3M3G 6,335 TlAT1004OFPN RON StXPASION Feb APPRNS-DISTAL i9 DUIETOUOM PEETOF i'PLASDCPIPE, GROWTH PARE W. REP.03URSEMENT m FROM UESTpGCUSTOMER 19590956 08 84PROVEMETFI'S- ALL CUSTOMERS WICIDTA FALLS RETRACT !x EUlPJA OF2"SIE10.. PD'E REPLACE IO pTRASTItUCR111E 19540986 Ijrc/ SVSTEM 0 ALL CUSTOME5t3 BLO3KBURNEfT REPLACE J. IOMETOfENT3- REPLACE 10 EEETOFP P'FRASDtUCNRE MCPPE'e WITH IO FEEF OF i" PLASTIC PIPE 195411JG 12.316 SVStFM P1PROVEb@2'S- ALL CUSTOMERS COLLEGE REPLACE lW REPLACE 350 FEEL OF 3. 511£!. STATION pFRASTItUCIVRE 1%41330 11,341 SVSTEM3UFEVEMENFS- ALL CUSTOMERS SANANGEIA REPLACE My RFPL OF 2"BARE pFRASTRUCMtE MEIFE£f SIEEI.. FEETOF 2' 19543386 191,185 MONOH]82 R60CATION OF FACD.ITIES- ALL CIISI'OMERS ROUND ROCK RELOCATIONTOAVOm Sep R110GTEDISTRB3UTION CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FACB.111F8 AS A RESULT OF PROJECT GOVERM.ffNIAL 1%43396 118.5% RFIOCATION OF FACO.RIES- ALL CUSTOMEIM FORT WORTH RELOGTIONTOAVOm lW RFIOCATEMiA ULT COWIICFW/PROPOBED PAC PROJECT FIESASARE9IJLTOF S3RFET RECO 19513)16 tIM OF PCOON pSTALLATION OF PW AND RESmEl4TW. ROYSECITY SYST3lMEKPAN510N Dec OPER ASTU DUETROWTFI MER IMD3TI II=O pCILFF GROWTH FOTRBIMW FACCCATI fOR COMPANY 1954it4G 5j31 R£LOCA FA ALL CUSTOMERS MCKP:68iY RELOIA TOAVOm Feb DIS LFFI3TD8- REIACATEDJSTR®UT10N CONFLI Wl FACB.OIESAS ARFSULT OF PROWOPOSED PROIER PAVEMEM OPERATIONS Page 46 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TE7( DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 47 of 155 DmCRPIIONoFcowu= DATEPLACED PROBECTSPLACED W GAS W GA3UTO.1Ty PROJECT UFDIFPPLA SHR MOR NSTOMEIIS PLANIw NUDIDER COI(I RETTREDDU GMRI BENEFITED TACATFON PMPOSEOFPwnJ SERVICE 19549wG 14,501 SYSTII4 OVFl.¢IlTS- AILNSTOMEIL9 PARIS REPLACE My RFPLACE60FFPIOFCASTDION D4FRA5IRUCNRE MAW WRN 60FEEf0EPLASL3C PMEANDMANDON205=OF CASTMONMAWS 1954416G 13,627 RdOCAT10NOFFACD.Rw$- ALLCUSNMERS MARRLEFALLS REIACAnL MAVOM Apr RELOCATEDLSTR MON CONFWCTW/momPo FACKITDSASARESULTOF PRmD EXCESS FDL DDR APPLICATIONS 19544880 3,917 SYSTASTMPROVEbfEM3- ALL NSTOMFRS WWTERS REPLACH J. REPLACE40FEEIOF6"BARE D4FRASUtUCTORE STFFYPIPE WRF140FEETOF6• 19545¢56 3,48] SYSTEM D. fl'ROVEIv s- ALL CUSI'OFff.N3 CRANppLL SYSTEM EXPANSION Fsb EXIENDMAOiSATREQUFSTOF DUETOCUSIOMER GOVERM.¢NIAL TY GROWTH 195454]0 6.8]] SYSTEMIFPROVEBfENIs- AU.NSTOMFXS SANANGELO REPLACE 1. REPLACE320PEEf OF4'BARE piFRASIRUCIURE STEEL PD•E WI'IF1330 FFEf OF 4• 19546100 11,215 WSTALLATION� COMMERCW. IDI,LSBORO SYSTEME%PANSION J.APPURTENANC6- ZISTwsTALL DIIH TOOUST064R DIS'IRLHMON FgCD.ITIFS, WII1l GROW W PMT W. REm®URSFdR�T FltOM O RE UESTMER 19546166 13,]5] RELOCATION OF IMOFFFACD.LTII+S- ALL CUSIObID4S WA)GFIACIDE RdOCAT10NTO AVODJ My RELOCATEDLS[R T NNFLIR WIPROPoS® FACD.1'F[ESAS ARFSULT OP SEWERRFPLACE64NL' PROTECT 19546310 53,AY1 RFLOCATWNOF FACD.ITffi- ALL CI15f06¢RS (EDM PARK RO.00AMNMAVOM Sep RFLOGTEDISTRLBUIION NNFLICI WJPROPoSFD FACD.RIES ASA PROTECT STREETRUS ONF RECONSTRUCTION 19546490 7,8M ST ALL NSIOMERS QUANAH REPLACE Mor AM92RO OFWB- REPLACE92 FEEL OF 6'HARE WFRASTRUCNRE STm.P@E WRJ192FEEf OF 4• 195/6510 BjH RFLOCATLONOPFACD.TIIFS- ALL NSTOb4R9 QUANAN RFIOCATLONTOAVOm !m RFIACATEDLSPt®URON CONFI.IW/PROMS® FACD.LTLESASAR OF PRTECT PRO 60VERNNID4fAL BQ 1954R]O ek710 NM1R.fr]tC1AI. CARROLLTON STS]iD4ERPANSLON Aog MRWID.IPRO0F0F'B- FORTIPLCATION OFOF DILE TONSIOAffie MAINS(INSIALL 6'PIASMCTIC PBI], OROWLH WRU4 ROMmom SOID 194R 813 INTLLATIONOPPR SYSM Ly UNS-wnA DUONOMM DISBUNFARR,W OAOWIH PMTLAL RFJB®URSQ.ffNI FAOM RE IJESTTIWU ObiFA 195485 00 309 INSTALLATIONOE PPEAND COMMIRCTAL NORTH SYSITMERPANSLON Apr APPURTENANCES-DEVFIAPER RICLIlAND DUEi0N3T@.¢R W DL9TRD3UTION IDLLS GROW W FACMITIMCD.O'ff3 FOR NMPANY 19551050 2,847 INSTALLATION OF PB RESmEMNL WAXAHACHIE SYSTEMFJ@ANSION Feb TA PURTENAN 30 DUE TONSTOMER FEET OF MCPTE OROWW 19552210 10,943 ONOFICPOE RELOCATIONOF FACD.IT'@S- AIL NEfOMERS DALLAS RF10CAilONTOAVOD) J. OGTEOLSTR®UTION CONFLICT WI PROPOSED PACD.RDSASARB9IILT OF PROJECT PAVING OPERATION$ INSTALLATION OF P@EAND COMRIDeCW. ABD.ENE SYSTEMEXPAMSLON IW APPUR DUETONSTOMptDIFIR®UTLONFACD MN FAcINSTALL ^'Rc,WILII GROWLNRED4BIIRSEMENIFRw.iRE E19512�(4,06'O TWGf:UST0A4R19.476 STS IRTPROVEb1EM3- ALL NSTOMERS TEAREI.L RIPLACE Feb REPLACE BARE STEEL.. MAWS ANO INFRASTRUCIIIRE SERVICE LINES Page 47 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 48 of 155 D ON OF WA3PLETW GAS DATE FUMPHOIECISPWCFJIIN NGARU33LRP PRO.ILCf UTO Fn FNSRRVICEOR CUSJOM PIA w NOD®6R COSI RSTTREDDURNG3003 BENEFnRD IACATION PURPOSEOFPROSRCT SERVICE MMM 1,501 NSTALLAnONOFPME RE IDE WOLFE COY SYSTEMEXPMWON len APPURTENANC69-mn LL 340 DUETOCIISTObffR FEETOF 2- PWSTIC M WITN omO PARTIAL REB.iBUR3Eb1ENT FROM GESTDIGCUSTOb1FA 195MVU 16.07 RF].00AMONOFPACI. MT ALL CUSTOMERS WNITFIiOWE RELOCAnONTOAVOM Me RELOCATEDISTMHMON CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FACI.ITI MAMULTOF PROJECT STREETRECONSTRUCIION 19535340 10,546 SYSTEML OVEMENIO- ALL CUSTOMERS FGNRIEITA REPLACE Apr RPPI.ACE 336 FEEFOF 3' STEEL D4FRASTRUCnJRE P W 2'PL MPIP6 19555560 2,191 NSTA ATIONOFPME COMIrIRCW. PARIS SYSTBIAERPANSION AP APPURTENANCES-NSTALL33 DUETOCUT FEETOF2'FLASnCP2EAND GROWTH SERVICERISER 19556590 (2,553) MTALWnONOFPMMD COMMFRCW, WREDALLAS SYSTEME%PANSION Nov APPURTENANCES -INSTALL DUETOCIJSD)MER DISTR MOHFACB.ITIES,WITH GROW RFJhIDURSEMENTFROM REQLWTMCUSFObDR 19556650 5,161 RF TIONOFFAMFFE- ALLCUSTOMERS FORTWORTR RELOC TIONTOAVOW Feb RELOCATEDISTR®UTION CONFWCT WIPROPOSED FAC6=4 ARF3RILTOF PROJECT STREEFRECONSTRUMON 19555]96 315 A` STALLAnONOFPlFEMD COAA¢RC4U. PLANO SYS'I'F.N E FANSION Mey APPURTENANCES -INSTALL OUETOCUSTOMER DlEI ONFACMTTES, WITH OROW PARTLtLREBSBURSEME Tmom UESFDJG CUSTOMER 19559010 3,500 NSTALLAMONOFP@EAND RESmENF1AL gNESMAN SYsTEMEXPANSION 1. APPNtTflSANCE9-NSFALL DUETOCUST DMMBMON FAMMES, WITH GROW PARTLO.REIf9�FRO.M IIESITNG CUSTOMFB 19560306 557 OMTWCURREDWITHTHE ALLCIISF064R5 iFI..flLE cOS1SN`CURREDIN J. REMOVALOFFACI,I -R= RETItNO FACLLSTNS 0 FF£F OF 2-PLAMC P@ 19560330 16,W9 SYSTEM OVEMENTS- ALL CUSTOMERS DEMSON REPWCE Fd REPWCEBARESTEELMANS NFRASTRUCTURE 195603W 16,075 SYSTEMTMPRGVEMENTS- ALLCUSTOMM DE ON REPWCE Feb REPLACEDEIERIORATM NFRASTRUCTURE 11NOERGROUNDFAM= 19560650 9,337 SYSI WFROVEMENTS- ALLCUSTOM1ID43 WNRESBORO REPWCE Feb REPWCEDEIERIOM= NFRASTRUCNRE UNDERGROUNDFAC62nE9 MOM 5,713 RE TioNOFFACIIJIFB- ALLCUSTOMERS WOLFEC RFLOGnON TO AVOM J. RdOCATEDISTR03MON CONFLICT WIPROFOSED FACM M A FMULTOF PI50JECf STORMDRAMBISTALLAnm IMING 356 CWTINCURREDwRETNE ALLCUSTObBiRB ABd cosTSIJCURREDIN 1. REMOVALOFFACMTI - RETIRING FACRTf1ES ABANDON nFEET OF4' CAEF MONPIPE 1956373G 6.301 9"S WPROVE S- ALL CUSTOb1ERS TERRELL REPWCE Feb REPLACE STE2]. MANS NFRASIRIICNRE 19562340 5,536 SYSTEM "ROVEMENIS- ALLCUSTOMERS TEb@LE SYSIE MANSION Sep FORTIFICAnONOFOFFSFJE UUETOCUSTOb MANS(NSTALL 3-P3.ASTIC PBE), GROWn1 WRN PARTW. REDdBURSE FROM G CUSTOMER 19563510 35,491 SYSTEt4I.iPROVEbtEMS- ALLCUSTOb MCGR R REPLACE Feb REPWCE490FEEFOFCBARE NFRASFRUCNRE STEEL.pwl,so FI$1'OFr BARE STEELFIFF A WFUTOFP Page 48 of 155 111 C • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 49 of 155 DESCRIPMON SRI.E[E IIATEPT.6Cm PROJECTS PLACED W GAS MG.ISOTOPIY PROJECT IMILRYPLANT015ERVINOR MIMNIS ER PLANFBI MASER COST ME DU G BENEFMED IDC.STION FMPOSEOFFROIELT SQ 19%n7G 17,%l SYSFEM [WROVFAffNFE- ALLNSIYIMERS MCGREGOR REPLACE My REPLANI00 FEEF OF BARE STEEL OPRAS3RUCNRE PPE WITH IODFFETOF PLASSIC 1956]000 WES- AN Fb MF IXG FALMES BELL LE AD ABA0N DiSMBUSON FACLLIFIEE 19563060 33330 SVSTFAI DPROVEMENIS- ALL NSTOtAiltS WIOTEWRIGHT REPLACE L4e REPLANDETFRFomm DIFRASIRIICTIIRE AMM UNDERGROUND FACLITIES 19563300 8350 SY NTS- ALLNSTOMERS MARLIN REPLACE lm RE ACE3SPR 01F 6'BARE DIRASSRUCIVRE FEEF OF4•PLASTIC LPWIE334FEU STFE3.P 434 PIPE, ANDS M£F a• BARE B S3ID. PPB WMR 31FFPFOF 6' PLASDCPPEAND 1] FEEF OF 4' 19563336 3338 NSTVALU FOWMHTIIE ALL NSTObIAS LOW NSISWNRRFDIN Mar RI]RJVAL FACO.MPS-RETIXE REMRWOFACOPTPS 4- H FEET OF 4' BARE STF®.. PPE AND 91 FEET OF 1' WRAPPED 19565690 1.701 SY ALLCUSIObP1t4 STAR RFILAN J. LACE.P=01F IPL STIC REMANMFEIE IIFRASSiRi1C111RE OF2'B PPEAND 3D FEETOFT 19563930U21 SYSTEM DPROVESEENMi- ALL CUST014FA5 WARANACIN REPLACE ieb REPLACE 300 FFYT x'135' OPRASIRUCSURE 10 FEU0F LSTEEL. SMCM FELTOF LD• PLASTIC PPE WMN 165 FEEF OF T PLA5ITC PPB 195639T0 3.871 SYS ALL N31'OAPRS TESPLE REPLACE Feb CE14R OF2'F3- REPLACE I4 FELT OFYBARE 01FRASTRIJCNRE STFIl PPE WfiH 14 FEETOf T 19561650 14,166 RFIOCATIONOFFAC6111ES- ALLCUSTOSPR.S PLANO RF2.00ATRMITOAV M A4 RELOCATE DISMBUFION NNFWCF WI PRoP FACRJTIESASARESIILTOF PROSECT NSTONIDt IIFSF 1956/566 4,MRELOCATIONO TPS- All NSIOMFAS ROBP`SON RF3.00AlFON TOAV003 Feb REIDCATEDESTR®UTIUIION CONFLIRWI PROPOSED FAC ESASASE TOF �D+ELT HIOH W AY RENNSTRUCIION 19566956 14,855 RE].00ATIONOFFACO.MIE9- ALLCUSIUAIAS w00DWAY RELOCATIONYOAVOID Feb RElOCATEDIST UTIW mIFLLTWIPRO� FACLMJES AS A RESULTOF PRO= STR EET RECONSTRI)C310N 1956/490 5323 RELOCATIONOFFAMd S- ALLCUSI'OS.PRS ROCRWALL RELOCAT30NTOAVOID AF Md ATEDIST BUMON NNFUCT WI PROPOS® FACO.331ESASARFSULTOi PROPLT SIREBFRF STRumo 19567890 16}27 SYSSFAS O.PROVEIrPMS- ALL NSIUM WIOTFSBORO REPLAN 9Mr REPLANDETERIORAThD IPRASTRUCNRE UNDERGROUEID FAN.MIS 1956fl540 11365 SYSPEM PPROVFMENB- ALL NSIObPRS SGLPHUR REPLAN m" ABANDON TIIF OF 3'CAST WIMIGS OWRASIRUCMIRE IXON PPE ANDIHFEETOP3' IM=OF2'PLA3TSC BARE SSFP). PPE AND INSTALL PPE 19563150 13,191 SYS)FIA DPROVFb1ElT[S- ALLNSTOPPAB TAYLOR REPLAN Feb REPLAN DEIORATED 06RASIRUT'NRE IJNDFRGROUTERND FACLITIES RE3DCATIONOFFACLMPS- 19568620 91,989 ALL NSTM4A5 DALLAS RELOCATIONTOAVOID Rv RELOCATEDISMBUTION IZEL CONFLICT W/PROPOSED MPS ASARFSULi OF PROLE( -T OOVFRNAffNTAL um 195691/0 3337 SYSTEM DPROVELtE<TTIS- ALLNSTOAPRS SANANGBTD REPLACE Jm REPLACE 59 FEET OF 3' pAYR B9FRAS'IRIICTURE STFF3.PPE WO 39 fFET OFY 19369530 1,101 SYST(MO.P60VQ.ONT3- ALL CUSTONIDIS SNTDBR REPLACE In REP IEIUORATIID OPRASiRU(TURE IRIDIMGRFAGROUND FACLRPS Page 49 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 PRBB 50 Of 155 DESCR ION OF COMPLE PROFECIS P"A MGAS owTE PIACTD MGw8O11LUY PROJECT VTILLTYPLANTDISE WMOR NBT08ff,RE y1ANim NUl�ER CObT RETiREDDO Gm BENEFTITD LOC.4TTON PURPOSE OF PR08ECT SERVICE 19570fi70 2,026 INSTALLATIONOFPPEAND CObAID4CW. FORTWORTN SYSTEM EXPANSION w APPURTENANCE4-D nALL203 DUETOCUSro FEETOF Y PLASTICPPEAND H3 GROWTH FEEFOF W PLASTICPPE, WRE PART W. BED.IDURSEMENT FROM RE UESTDIONOFPI E0. 195107fi(7 1V.58 R4STALLATION OF CObAfERCW. FORT WORTH SYS'fEMEXPANSION Q4 AP MnE 203 DUE TOCUSTOMER OF3'IANCES-INSTALL FEEL OF3'PLASTICPPE WITH GROWTH PARTIAL REB.iBURSEMETTI £ROM VESTING CUSTOMER 19570940 15,916 SYSTEM APROVEMENTS. ALL CUSTOMERS 6AD4FSVIlLE REPLACE Efm REPLACEDETENURATID INFRAOTRUC7URE UNDERGROUND FACB,RPS 19571VO 17,I1W RELOCATTONOFFAM=. ALL NSTOMERS 2FAPLE RFL nONTOAVOM Feb RE LOCATEDISTR MON CONFWCCW/PROPOSED FACB.RI MARESULTOF PROTECT STREETRECONSTRUCIION 19571290 6,309RELOCATION OP FACB.ITAS- ALL CUSIOM1PR.S RICHLAND RELOCATIONTOAVOW Feb RELOCATEDISIRIBUTION CONFLICIW/PROPOSED FACB.RIFSASARESIILTOF PROTECT STRBETRECONSTRUCIION 19571650 3,9)9 SYSTEM B.iPROVEMENT3- ALLCUSTOMERS BELLMFAD REPLACE Im REPLACE30FEETOF3'BARE D4FMSTRUCRRtE STEEL PPE WRH30FEETOF 3' 1958570 26,003 SYSTAI APR0VE6 s- ALL CUSTOMERS BRYAN REPLACE Ape RRPL9.CESOOFEET OF V STEEL OfPRASTRUCNRE PPE WIM 5W FEEIOF6-PLASTIC 1958680 50,554 RELO MONOFFACB.RIFS- ALLCUST064]IS GRANDPRARUE RELOCATIONTOAVOM M REL MDISTRIBUUON COMAL W/PROFOSED FACD.RPSASARESULTOF PROIEC[ STREETRECONSTIIUCDON 1957413G 10,513 SYSTEM APROVEb1EME- ALL CIISTOEIFRS 1RVING REPLACE Apr REPLACEDEIERiORATED INFRASiRUCNRE UNDERGROUND FACB.ITPS 1957UIG 1,327 SYS APROVEb1ENTS- ALL 6USTOMERS HICD REPLACE Fd REPLACE IOFEET OF 3 -STEEL. PPE DIFRASTRUCNRE WITH IO FEET OF 3 -PLASTIC PPE 19575490 7,562 SYST "ROVEMENIE- ALL CUSTOMERS RICO REPLACE Feb REPLAMW FEETOF 2' BARE B'B'RA51R[ICNRE SLID. PPE WRN 290 FFETOF 2' 1957686 12.935 MSTALLA'RONOFPPEAND RESmENnse COMFORT SYSTEM EXPANSION Sm APPURTENANCES-WSTALL DUETOCUSTIX.fER DISTR® ONFACD.ITPS OROWIH 195878G 4,945 SYSTEMAPROVENEMTT3- ALL CHSTOFPRS JIVING SYSIPATEXPANMON My FORTBICAEONOFOFFSRE DUETOCUSTOE04 MAINS (INSTALL 4-PLASRC PPE), GROWTH WTf H PART W. �URSFl.¢M' FROM UESTINGCUSTOMER 19576166 110 COSTINCURREDWRHTHE ALL CUSTOMERS HAMLIN COSTS INCURREDIN Feb REMOVALOFFACB.RPS- RETIRDIO FAC6RTF$ ABAtb70N85FEETOFT WRAPPED BI ID. PPE 19578170 3,693 RELOCATWNOFFACBI . ALL CUSTOMERS HAIA,W RELOCATIONTOAVOM Apr RELOCATE DISTRB)VRON CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FACO.ITPSASARESULTOF PROTECT WGHWAY RECONSM=ION 1951903G 19.M SYSTEMD.PROVEMENIS- 5LLCUSTOMER3 GADIE9VALE REPLACE May REPLACEDEiER10RATID RVFMSTRIICNRE UNDERGROUND FACD-1TIFS 19579176 10.M RELO MONOFFACAfIIES- ALL CUSTOMERS KB.CEDi RELOCATIONTOAVOM FA RELOCATEDISTRIBUTION CONFLICTWIPROPOSED FA�ARESULTOF PROTECT COMMERCW DEVELOP PRBB 50 Of 155 • E 11 ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 51 W 155 DESCRPFION OFCO DATE PEGGED PRO3ECF5 PLACEIS W GAS W G63DDLRY PROJECT 11TdFFYPI FMSERWUORNSTOMERS FL w NUMBER COSI RETMEDDMNG2003 RRISEFFIED LOCATION FORD OFPVD3 SERVICE 193]9190 3)05 RELOGHONOFEACB.RPS- ALL NSttlMER3 FRmM1 SBU RELOCATKWTOAVOM Sep RELOCATEDISTRIBUTION RO CONFLIRW/PROPoSED FACB.ETIESASAMULTOF PROJEf.T JNSFALLATION OF DRA WAOE DRCR 193]9290 1,103 SYSTEM IMPROYEMEN)S- ALL CUSfOMER3 ]].ECIRA RPPLACE Im REPLACE DEFERIORATED OPRASIRUCNRE UNDERGROUND FACPFTJES 195]9]36 950 SYSTEMR OVEMENT3- ALL CUSTOMPJ88 ALLEN REPLACE Im REPLACEUNDERGROUND WFRASTRUC[URE 195800]0 149,136 RELOCATIONOFFACD.DIDS- ALL NSTOM Mt Q RELOCATION TO AVOID JW RELOCATEDMTUB3 ON OO F KFW/PROPOSED FACLLTIIESASAFESULTOF PROJER STREEFRBCONSTRUCTION 19530110 105,197 RELOCATIONOFFACD.ITIES- ALL NSFOMFRS LEWTSVIU.E RELOCATIONTOAVOID W RELOGTE DISIR®U1EON CON ICT W/PROPO E FACRITIESASARESULTOF PROTECT STRPtTRECO =UCTION 19530166 Um SYSIHMIMPROVEMENT3- ALL NSIOhffR$ MNREGOR REPLACE My REPLACE 100 FEEFOF 3' BARE DffRA51R11CR1HE SIE}]. PPE WRH 100 FEETOF 3' 19580390 252 SYSTEM 0.PROVFA¢NFS- RESIDHMVS@ COLLEGE SYST WANSION M FORTTEICATEONOFOFFSRE CORDffRCW. STATION DUETOCUSTOMER MAWS(DISFALL2,800=OFC OROWFH PLASTIC PU% W12H PARILU. RE0.IDURSEMENTFROM RE UESWP NSTOMER 19380710 I5j31 SYSA ALL NSIOAffiRS MCKDJNEY REPLACE 0@ 150FEET OF CS- REPLACE 150 FEET OF 4' HARE DU'MSIRUCNRE STEEL PPE160 4" 19581330 <,]& PRO S. SYSTEMIMPROET ALL NSTOMERS HELLMEAD REPLACE Feb OF 3'S- REPLACE ]1BFEE115=RAPPED DPRASPtUCFURE Sy PPEVAIN115FEETOF2" 19582210 99] ALL NS'ro6PRS PLANO SYSTPMEXPANSION Sep FORT[F.1WPROOFOFFSS- FOA'JPICADO ESITE pUE TOCUSTI L V F MAWSARM LL 4" PLASITCPPEJ, GROWOI W OD PAR1V1 RFAIDURSEMETI'F FROM TBJ6CUSFOMER 19583356 3,182 JNSTALLATION OF PPTA COAAffRCW. CEDARPARK SYSTTD=FOMER FM 200 DUETDCUSTOMER FMFOFENANCFJi-WSE FEEI'OF YPLASTICPPE GROWTH 19382X0 10,268 SYSTFMRPROVE6PMB ALL NSTOhffR3 GREENVD,LE REPLACG Ma Y REPLACE I]3 F e" BARE MFRASTRUCNRE STEEL PPE WifH 175 1]3 PEEFOF4" 19583480 IOjTS SYSIIIAWPROVEMENTS- ALL NSTOMEAS GAMESVO,LE REPLACE Op REPI.ACEDEFENOM WFRASIItUCIURE UNOFAOROU6O FAC6RP3 193838Hi 33,660 RELOCATIO D.ITB9- ALL CUSTOMERS DENTON RECO OAOSE3 lm ISTRIB RELOCATEDISIRWEIiION UVVIP CONFLICT W/PROPo4D FACRRPS AS ARESULTOF PRO= CDEVELOPhffNF C1AL 193831]0 9,151 RELOCA ELOCATIONOFFACD.I ALL NSTO.W]LS iEBPLE RELOCAHONTOAVOID Feb RELOCATEOISTRJBUJJON CONFLICT W/PROPoSED FACD.FI'03,9 AS ARRSUI. PRO JECT LIONON STRFPFRENOF 193856006.N7 85600 FA RELOCATIONOFFACR.FFPS- ALL NSTOAPRS DALLAS RELOCA AVOID N ov RELOCATEp15TR®U]ION CONFLICF Wlm W/PROPoSED IACD. A E A RF3ULTOE PROJER DRAW OJER PR 19535/60 Ij@ WSTALLATIOAHON OF PPEAND COMMERCIAL ROUNDROCK SYMFPA RMB- WTA OUTOUTOMER MERISM GROWH 19536816 9,]]6 IONOFFAS ALCObPRS AWTON MOCAVONTOAVOM MFM ar RLOAMDISDON commRW/ROPOSED FACPMAFJ PRO3C SNNSTRUCON Page 51 W 155 CJ • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 20D3 Page 52 M 155 N OFCO DATE PIACBD PROJECTS PJACEDEV GAS M GAS UTRJIY PROJECT UTRITYPT TMSERVIMOR CUSTOMERS FL w NUMBEB COSI RETIXEDDU G20R3 BENEFRED LOCATION PMPOSE OF PROJECT SERVICE 19586830 kD5 SYSTEM OVEMENTS- ALLCUSTOb1ERS CALDWELL REPLACE Mu REPLACEIWFEEIOF2"BARE MFRASTRUCNRE SLID. PIPE WITH 100 FEET OF T 19SM20 ;026 SYSTEM D.iPROVEMEN3S- ALL CUSTOMERS BROW OOD REPLACE J. REPLACE DETERIORATED MFRpSTRllC[IEtE UNDERGROUND FACRTIIE$ 19588530 6,262 SYSTEMB OVEMFJ9IS- ALLCUSTONDRS MCOREGOR REPLACE Ma REPLACE 150FEET OF T WRAPPED MFRASIRUCRIRE STEEL MEWRN 15UFEETOF 2' 195887IG 2,510 MTA UMON OF FM AND RESmENTLV. PARIS SYSTEMEXPANBION Fd APPURTENANCES-MSTALL DUETOCUSTOMER OLSPR® ONFAMd GROWTH 19589380 18955 RE TIONOFFACB.RD'S- ALLCUSTOA FORTWORTR M.00MONTOAVOM Sry RELOCATEDISTIUBU ON CoNF W/PROPOSED FACB.II3ESA8ARFEULTOF PROIER STREETRECMSTBUCIONAND WATERLMEINSTALLAHON 19589380 1921 SYSTEM DriPROVFMENI3- pLL CUSTOMERS RR,LEEN REPLACE F48 REPLACE26FEJJ70FT WRAPPED pSRASTR1iCTIJRE STEEL PIPE WRH26FEEIOF 2' 19589810 1,938 BJSTAI.LATION OF PM AND RE4mENner HUTTO SYSTEM EXPANSION Aug APPURTENANCES -De TALL IXJETOCUSIOMER DIS3RBRTIIONFACR= I GROWTH 1959032G 23,120 RUOCATIONOFFACB2 . ALL CGSTOMERS DALLAS RELOCAT TOAVOM May RELOCATEDISIRIBUIION CONFLICTWIPRm= FACEJT MAMULTOF PROffLT STRP£l ANDDRAMAGE 19590340 3935 MSTALLAHONOFPTPEAND RFSmFIVI1AL WACO SYETEMEXPANMON Feb APPURTENANCES-MSTALL 95 DUETONSIOMER FEEIOF2'PLASDCPTE GROWTH 19591010 169W RELOCATION OF FACD=- ALL CUSTOEIDtS GARLAND RE.O `OONTOAVOW An RELOCAPEDISTR®UI M CONFLICT WIPROPOSED FACdR MARESULTOF PROJECT EASEMENT ISSUES 19591350 1,683 RELO nONOFFACR.IT@S- ALL CUBTOMERS HARY.EIt RELOCATIONTOAVOW IAv RELO nDMTIUBUOON MGM OO FLICIW/PRDI?o= FACR.TTDSASARESULTOFLEAR PRO= MMOMEHOMEPARR 19591MG 23,918 SYSTEMTMPROVEMENTS- ALLCUSTOMFRS 513fRMAN REPLACE An REPLACE DETERIOMTFD INF-RAS3RUCIURE ]MI lEROROUNDFAMOM 19592190 13.826 SYSTEM WROVENIENT4- ALL MOOMFRB FREDERTCXSBU REPLACE Oa REPLACE DEIERIOMSED RG DD"MEIRUCIURE UNOERGROUNDFAMOM 19XBIG 35,088 M,OCAHONOFFAdIL=- ALLNBTOb DALLAS RELOCAHOXMAVOW Od RFI.00ATEDISTRIBUIION COFDLICIW/PROPOSED FACD.R MAMULTOFNEW no= DRAMAGEMSTALMTION 19592530 4,124 SYSTEMMiPROVEMENIS- ALLCUSTONIERS WACO REPLACE My 1UPLACE5FIMOF4-BARE MTRASTRUCTURE =LPTE WRN 5 FEEIOF C PLASTIC PM; REPLACE GATE 19592856 18,933 SYSTFMMiPROVEb1EM3- ALLCUSTOMFRS ABM REPLACE Mer REPLAM3%FFLT0F2'8ARE MFRASIRUCTUPJ: ST?IPE W13H394 FEETOF P 19592960 14,949 SYSTFMU.lPROVEBiF ALL CUSTOMERS ABB.EHE REPLACE Feb RFPLACE2n FF£TOF4'BARE MFRASPILUCNRE STEFIP@ W MFEETOF4' 19593130 n,491 RFI TION OF FACB.RwE- ALL NSTOb1ER5 DALLAB RE TIONTOAVOID Aug RPLOCAPE DISTRIBUTION CONPLICTw/PROPOSED FACD.TTIESASAMMTOF PROJECT ALLEY WPROVEMENTS 1959389G 26.303 RELOTAHON OF FACRJTBS- ALLCUSTONiFA3 MCELNIJEY RELOCATH3NTOAVOW Apr RELOCATE DLSTR ON CONFL[CTW/PROPOSED FACROMMARESULTOF PROTECT SHO]3IRECONSTRUCHON Page 52 M 155 Ll • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 53 of 155 DERCRWTION OF COMPLETED mm� PROJECTS PLACED M GAR M GASDID.DY PROJECT UTDITYPL MSERVICIOR CUSTOMERS P FM NUOMEB COSI' RETMED DURDOG 1003 BINBFMD LOCATION PURPOSEOFPAOJECT SERVRB 195%IBG 336 COST DICURRED WTFH THE ALL CUSTOMERS MBON COSTS MCMMEDM Feb REMOVAL OF FACLITUM- RFMM4GFACBJTTF3 ABANDON316FEETOF 3' PLASTIC POE 1959/596 1,918 SYSTEVEMFNSS- ALL N$TDMER$ STFPSlEEM1n.LE REPLACE Apr REPLAcawFCE365FFEf OFYBARE MFRASIRUCNRE STEELPIPE 365 FEET OF 135' 19594fiBG 5,549 RO RJMAa 3ROVE ALL CI3STOMFAS SQ.iPLE REPLACE Feb AMS- REPLACEOETERIORALFO DYFRASSRUCNRP UNDERGROUND PACD.FIIER 19594T3G 2,159 COMbffRCW, MFA RYRTEMDWANSION My MPUATENAN TALL 430 DUE TONSTM.WR �NSTALLATlONOFPHEAND FEEL OF 2'PLASIICFTPCPWE WRH GROWTH PART W. REB.IBURSEMEM' FROM UES9D4GCUSFOMER 19395036 198,813 RELO ALL CUSTOMERS DAI.LAR RFMICFWITOFO6M Sep TEDISFFACR.]TWS- RELOCATE DI ULT CONIlICf W/PROPOSm WS ASAR�SULT OF A PROIEGT ALLEY 0. ALLEY 19593456 1,631 RELOC ON OF FANTS ALL NSTObffRS OEOAGFI'OWN REFTLICT NTOAVOD My TEDIS RJBMO1E5- TEDISTR®URON CONFLICTW/PROPORm FACE ARESULT OF PROJECT DEC OPRAR DEVELOPER UEST 19595696 4,469 MSTALLAnON OFNSTA RFSDENOAL SULPHOR MCUSTO ]ON Feb APPTIRTENAHFS-MSTALL SPRMOR DUE DUE TOCUSTOMER DISOR ORONTO 19595996 3,025 nOONFACB.ITTES RELOGnON OP PACD.NIES- ALL NSS061FRR ftELOCAT90NTOAVOD J. Rp.00ATEDISTAIB STATION STAn N CO2WLI T FACdnWA ASARESULTOF PF CFOPOSED PROTECT GOVERNNWNFAL REQUPST 19596066 641 COS ALL C11R1'OMERS BROWNWOOD COSTS DJCURREOM Feb VM OFFDWITHTHE AEMOVALOFFACD.rf RETDDiO FACdIT1E4 ABANDON 55 FEET OF 1.35'U' m.Asnc Piece 19596T9G Bil DISSALLATIONOFPWEAND CORRffiItCW. PLANO !w APPUUBU7OOCFS-DITT DUEFOEXPANRJON DUE TOCUSFObOBt OL9TRIBUnON FACB.ITIES, W1O , GROWn1 PARTIAL REQ.MURRET�NF FROM MQMMGSTOMER 19599196 14499 RELOCAnON nONOFOFFACdITff9- ALL CUSTOMERS CORSICANA Mer RELOCATEDISTR 00Y =ONTOAVOD CONFLIR W/PROPOSED ESULT FACdITWAASARESULTOF PROJECT VEE 199996 11119 Mwof`FlWM RFDN COLLEGE TPNSION My AF,ueE"E- MSTA STAnON DUETOCU FFOETOFUYPLAC GROWFH 19598110 9,13 MSTAnONOFFEN RERDENnAt SFWRMAN SYSTFMEJWANS]ON Mer AP 366 OUE TOCUSTOb1ER 0F2'ANCE9-MSTALL FEETOF Y PLO PWE GROWTH 19398630 IBjfiJ RYSnM UWROVFJ..OFPS ALLCUSTOMERR GREYEST REPLACE J. REPLACE WOFFET OF3'STEEL INFw651RUCNRE PWE WATI600 FEET OF 3' PLASnC 19595966 18,348 RELOCAnONOFFACD.RWA- ALLCUSIOMF1t5 DEN[ON RELOG J. RACH=SMSTRMVnON W/FOAVOm CONFLICT W/PROPORED FAC6.11'ASASA RRSULTOF PROJECT ORNEW SFRUCTION 19599606 3336 MSTALLATIMnON OFPWEANO RESDEI4ML MARRHAI.1. SYETOERPANRION 1.1u APPU CREEK DUE TOCUSTOb1ER UMNCFAMOMS O15TR®UTIONF R GROWTH 19599nO 391 j36 FAME RET.00 FFAC ALL CUSTOMERS PFLUGERVRLE REL TO D Apr TED ON RELOCATEDLRAM CnONFC/ snFO CONFLICTW/PROPoSED T FACDJTWAASARFAUUEST PROTECT GOvptM.4NTAL REQUEST J960909G 1,122 RELOGnONOFFACB.ITTFS- ALLCUSFOMERS FREDFATCRSBU RELOCAnON TO AVOM Sq RELCCAMDISMMU9ION RG CONFLILTW/PROPOSED FACBATWAASARRSULTOF PROJECf CUSTOMER Page 53 of 155 t CJ • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DRASION GAS RELIABIUTY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 54 of 155 DESCWPTIONOP OMPLE DATE PIACED PROL MPLACED W GAS W GAS G18.IlY PROJECF UiFBlIYP1ANCWSERVICEOR CUSTOMERS PWNIW NUMBER COST RE3TRRDDURWGSOM BENEFFFED 1ACAT]ON PURPOSE OF PROTEGE SERYILB 1%00206 41,232 NSTALLATIONOFPR'EMD AUSTW SYSTEM ERPANMON Aug APPURTENANCES- WSTALL 101 D11E TO CUSTONffR SEItVICELDIFS GROWTH 1%00210 49,2411 SYSTFMRTK)N EFOFTS ALL C133TOMERS AUSTW SYSTFMERPANSION Aug FOR]iFICATION OFOFFSIiT DUE TOCUSTH MAWS (WSIALL 1,21)FEEI OF B' GROWTH PLAST C 19600316 41,501 SY ALL CUSTOMF]tS FORTWORM REPLACE Ap CE 71 =01`NTS- RFPLACfi ]I6 FEEF OF 4"SiF]]. D1iMSIRUCNRE OF 4•PULAMC?SIICPPE 825PffEANDSERVIFFFIFE 19600936 11,115 SYRN ROVEMENIS- CONAfERCW. CORSICANA SYSTEMERPANSION Alt FORWT3FXGTITIONOF OFFSITE DUE Ib CUSTOMER MAWS, Wf[H PARTW. GROWTH RED.IBUR FROM 19601026 3,736 WSTALLAVON HON OF PIPE COMMERCW. WAXAHACHIE SYSTEMERPANSION Ape APPURTENANCES- MSTWSTALL 32] DUETTOS031L FELT OF Y PLASDC PD'R WFIH GROWROWTH PARTIALR FROM REQlIF. CUSTOF 19601TLG 14j58 NPROUSTON S SYSTEM0.4ROVEMEN'LS- ALL NSTOSIER.S W}R31FEY REPLACE Mry (ORATED WFIIASIIFIICIURE UNDMUROWD UNDFRGROUNDFACE 1%OITIG 11312 SYSTEM DfPROVEI.ffI:'IS- S- ALL CUSTOMERS CORSICANA REPLACE My EDETERIORATfD ADRASTRUCNRE UNDERGROUNDFACD.i UNDM 1960176G 3305 SYS]Eh1ISiP110VEMENTS- ALL CIISTOSffR.S GR06BECK REPLACE Feb RFPLACEDE-IERTORAIID WFMSTRUCHIRE 1960186 3,41 WUNSDTAERGARTOIUONNDOFPIPEM COMNA SYSMYN90N MD AUN-WSNA DUETROW T DISTRI6UHONFACD3T�5, WITFI GROWTH PAR'ML REWIOURSEMQIi FRW H KAQLME GMR 19601816 13b% SYSTEMIMR ALL NSTOSIER3 BOWDi REPLACE luo REPLACE285FEEL OF OF4' 4'S3EII. DD'RASIRUCTURE SERVICEL C E 285FEEIOF4'PLASTIC PeE 285= 196020I0 5,027 STS O.1PROVEN ALL CUSTOMERS OLNET REPLACE F&REPLACE OF YP A 120 FEEL OF 3`LASTIC WFRASIRUm 19602210 23,H9 S ALL CI35TON1EAS ABEENE REPLACE 1W "DON.IIVO ONI3- ABANDON122FEETOF3`BARE WFltASTRUCIURE STFPL P1PE AND 239 FF£I OF 4' BARE STEEEPPIPE 19602320 6,750 SYSTFMD.IPROVEMENTS- RO ALL CUSTOMERS ABR.ENE REPLACE Feb REPLACE216FEEI OFTBARE WFRASTRUC}VRE STEEL PIPE VaTH 196028]6 2,936 OHO180FEETOFT ATION OF PIPTA COMMERCIAL. FLOWER SYSTEMEXPANSION Op FNANCFSMMS.L ARPUR L MOUND DUEi0CU3TOMER DHTU DL9TR®UNON FAW.UffS, WITH GROWTH PARTW. RER.iBURSEFffM' FROM RE IIFSTWTER 1%01936 3,808 WSTALI.ATION OF IOKOFP PIPE AND RESIDENTIAL NOCONA SYS! Sep APPURTENANCES- 632 TO CUSTOSION DUE 10 NSTOMER PM Va OFYPLASTICP�E,WFIH GROWTH pm PARTW. RFILSBUR$FEffiNi FROM RE GF 19603710 13)] WSTALLAHON NOOF PHT PWEAND RESmENiIAL SOUTHLAKE SYSFTOCUSTNMON Dec APPI2 DEVELOPER DUE TOCUSTOMER LEDDI WSTALLEDDIRiRIBUOfAP GROWTH FACRITIFS FOR lHE COMPANY 19604390 6,805 RELOCAHONOFFACEITE3- ACL CUSTOMERS BEUS RF]. THDNTOAVOID Feb RELOCATEDMTR®UT1UN CONFTICIWIPROPOSED FACO.LT�S AS A RESULT OF PROJECT GOVERNMENTAL REQ= Page 54 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 55 of 165 DESCRUMON OF CIX.PLE3ED PROJECTS PLACED IN GAS DATEPLACED W GA6 UlWIY PROJECT UTOdTY PLANT w SERVICE ORNSTOMRHS P IN NUMBER COST "TLREDDU G21NO BENE= IACAiTON PURPOSEOFPROBCT 3MMOS 1960MIG 53961 RELOCATIONOFFACEITPS- ALLNSTOAPRS COLEMAN RELOCATIONTOAVOR) Aug RELOCATEDL43RJBUIION NNPLICT W/ PROPOSED FA�ASARERU TOP PROJECT STREETRECONSTRUCOON 1960506G 11;99 RELOCATION OF FACR.OPB- All.c MFR -5 DALLAS RELOCATION TOAVOID Apr RELOCATEDI5IR®UiION COF1 la WI PROPOSED FACU.ITIE4ASARESULTOF PROJECT E%POSED MAw 1%06000 34985 SYSTEMU.¢RO ALL L CUSTOMERS DALLAS REPLACE 11v REPLACE 186PEET OF GF6'6' CAST wFRASTRLYT2JRE UBON PWE WITH 6' 196063W 3,659 RELOCATIONOFFBIVOOffS- ALL CUSTOMER$ EARLY REI,OCATIONTOAVOR) FM RELOCA DINFAFEETOF ON CONFLICT W/PROPOSm ASARIU FACU.OIES ASARE$ULT OF PROJECT EASFMFNONOF 1960)IaG 3,314 FS RELOCAMD]SFFACD.TOES- ALL CUSIOAffR.S WAN R Feb TE NFLICTONTOAVOR) NNFLI W/PROPOSED FACM ASSTR RESULT OF FR PROJECT SA MS AIARESULT SEWERwSTALLATION 1%08570 9,905 SYSTEMU.PROV- ALL NSTOAPILS WAN REACE PL !m REPLACE 16DFIBTI'OF OF2'B3' BARE wFMSIRUCNRE STE PPE WOO 180 FEET OF 2" 19608226 2,143 UVSTALLATION OF PPE AND COAAPRCW. DALLAS SYS'ISMEXPANSION Oa APPURTENANCES-OEVELOPER DUETONSTOMER FLAmcEDF'm5I OF g' OROWw PLASTIC PPE, 345 FEET OF 3' P T[CPPE.AND3FEETOFr PLASTICPPE FOR NAPANV 19608)30 9j26 wSIALLATION OFPPEAND RESIDENML CmARHBl SYSTEM]MANSiON Sep APPURTENAN TALL DUE TOTOAffR FAC[LI DIg]R®UTION FACR.ITPS, WfIH OW GROWTH NTPROM IREOPARTW.R O CUSMW IIESTIO NSTOMER 19608y8G 32,830 RELOCATEDM FAUIGTIFS- ALLNSTIM4lts BUFFALO RELOCATW/FROPVOID Apr RELOCATEDLSTR NNFWPR W/PROFOSED UIJLT FACU.IT�SASARESULT OP PROJECT GOVERNAffNN URAi 19608850 (116) wSTAGLATIOOF PPE ANO COMMERCIAL ARLMGTON SYSTEM EXPANSION Apr APPURTENANCES. MnALL DUETONSTOMER wSTRIB TONFACU.TIPS,WITH GROWTH PART FUHMB RSEMEM FROM RE UESMONSTOWR 19MIG IKM REIA MONOFFACR.=- ALLCUSTOMERS CADDOADI.LS RELOCATION TO AVOID JW RELNAMDISTRB3 ON CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FACR= AS A RESULT OF PROTECT STRFPTRECONSTRUCIION IWN31G 17,913 SYSTE WROVEAm03- ALLCUSTOMERS BONHAM REPLACE May REPLACEDETFAIORATED U4FMSTRUC LRE UNDEROROUNDFACHJR 19609470 381,133 wSTALLATIONOFPPEAFID ALL CUSTOMERS PFLUGERV FORTU'1CATION OR Dec APPURTENANCES -PROCURE SYSTEM D4ROVEA¢NT RIOHTOFWAYA INSTALL5,500 FETTOF 8' PLASTIC PPE 196095/0 4,335 SYSPFM B OROVEMEHIB- ALLCUSTOAPIfS SANANGELO REPLACE Feb REPLACET9FEETOF2'RARE U9FRAti11tUCi'URE SLID. PUS WRN99=OF 2- MMOG ;149 SYSTEMIAPROVQAENIB- ALLNSTOMERS MCCAULLEY REPLACE Feb REPLACEIOFEETOF3'BARE DJFRASTRUC[URE RIT?]. PPE WON W FEETOE r 1%Ia1JG 2,4sy NSTwCIiRRED WITH TI@ ALLCUSTOAPRS GREENVLLLE OOSTS WCURREDw Mey REMOVALOFFAM, - REURU40FACU.ITIE4 REMOVE 116 FEET OF r BARE 196I0IeG 1941 SYSTOd 0.PROVEMENIS- ALLNSIOAPAS WAXAHACHP REPLACE Fel RFPLACEDEIFRIORATM U4F'RASTRUCTURE UNDERGROUND FAM =s Page 55 of 165 E • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 58 of 155 DESCR ONOFC08T DALE �� PROJECTS PLACED w GAS wGAgNw PROJECF UTR.RY PLANFw SER VICE OR NSFOMPJIS E COST REFRIED D5003 BENEPIIE➢ LOCATION PURP08EOF PROJECT ggRVICg smwN 1%10666 1961 3,503 wSTALLATION OF PBEAND OFPR RE4mENIlAI, CfBI.DRES3 SYSTFME%PANNON Mu AP MCE9-R9SFALL2M DUEroNSFOFR]i PERF OF2'OFY PLASTICPTE, WITH GROWTH PART W. RFJI.IBURSFA¢Nf FROM REQ�Q GUSTO MR 19610930 51501 SYSTEM IbTROVE3¢F]FS- ALL NSroMERS W)CHFIA FALLS REPLACE Mer REPLACE I%FEE100 4'BARE wFRA3TRUCRTRE STSTA PIPB WRH 100£EEF OF 4• 1%11166 64w ATION OF PTEAND CObwIDtCW. BRUSHY CREIX Im APPM APPURTENANCES-wSFALL IXwTONSIOMER ]WETOfl M]VEER DISTUBU]IONFACB.iT1FS,WFIH GROWTH PA]1 PARML REB.fB� FROM TAG NSTOMFR 1%11170 2326 SYSIEMATR ALL NSTOMERS SAN ANGFLO REPLACE Feb REPLACEE F U4''BA 4'BARE INFRASTRUCIIBIE STEELPTEWI 33 4" 1%11566 25,163 FAFHEFOF RMXATIONOFFBC S- ALL CUSroMER3 IRVING R60 AVpm J. RF]ACATEDL4IR®UT10N ON mwlm CONFLICF W/PROPOS® FACBJTIE4 AS ARU9 PROTEGE SIRECON3FRUCRON ONF 1%11626 2,807 wn3TAL1ATION OF PIPE AND RE9mEN'RAL ROCKDALE ERPAN510N My APPURTENANCPS-w3FALL IZO DUETO ➢UE TO NSFOMER FEET OP 2"PLASTIC PTE, WHH GROW[H ENIFROM REQMPARTW.REB� rwc cu3MUEroMTx 1%11866 3380 RELOCATIDNOFFACBJ ALL NS]OhIDtS SANANGFFA RELOCA OA Feb RELOCATEDISB®UTION CONFWCT WIPW/PROPoSED FACRRTBASARE9ULT OF PROIFIT EASEAffNF LSSIJFS 1%12830 6,393 SYSTEM D.21 O FLATS- ALL CUSTOMERS WICWFA PALLS REPLACE Ap REPLACE 181 ='BARE INFRASIRUCNRE ST2TL PIP 181 181 FEET OF 3' 1%13940 2,0]t RO SYSTEM DTROVENAN ALL NSFOMERS WAXAHACHT REPLACE Feb OO REPLACEDEFERFAM wiRA3TRUCNRE UNDERGROUND FACILFFTS 1%13020 6,00 SYSIEMI350=0]FrB ALL N3rOMF1tS PoTISBORO REPLACE MR REPLACE 330 FEEL OF 2' BARE wFRASTAUCFIIRE I%13010 I,TM SYSTEM0 RIEFFI'S- 198 ALL NSroMI]85 DELFAN REPLACE FM REPLACE198 FEET OF 2' BARE DTFRASTRIICIVRE STEEJ.PTE WRH 196 FEEF OF 2' 1%I305G 3,0)1 SYSFEMw4RO ALL NSroMERS 11ROWNWOOD REPLACE Fd Oi 4- REPLACE B'4'CASTIRO01 wFRq$TRUCFURE 80U PTE WRH BO fEEFOF4" PLASTC 1%14650 11028 SYS"M20RO ALL CUSNMFRS ABRENE REPLACE Mer REPLACE 30FEB U6 -B- 6'BARE 1NERASFRUCTIRtB 10 STEEi.. PTEAND 10 FEEFOF 3• BARESTEEL PTEFEEF OF 6' PLASTC PTEAMND I0 i0 FEEF OF 3' 1%13596 19p37 RflACAMDMMACRJTW4- ALL NSTONRJLS COLEMAN RELOlawlroAVOW Aug RELOCATE STR®UTION CONFLImW/PROPOSEO FAf31.D1E3 AS A RESULT OF A PROTECT SIREELO TINCTION 1%15610 213,569 RELOCATION"ONOP FACB.FIIIS- ALL CUSTOMER$ COLEMAN RELOlawlmO Nov REIOCATEDISA ULT NNFLInW/PROPOBED OSE) FACS.1]'TS ASARESULT OF PROTECT STRXAnOONSIRUCRON 1%15680 26,016 REi ATONOFFACRF11E5- ALL CUSFOMERS COLEMAN RELOCAHONPR VWM Nw RELOGTEDISTR CONFLICT W/PROPOSED ESMTN FACBJTTSAS ARE9ULTOF PROTECT SIREEFRECONSIRUCFiON 1%13780 SJ,IH REI.00ATIONOFFACR.ITIES- ALL NSfObTRS FRISK RELOCATION TOA Sep RmmAnmSTRIBmm CONFIJCF W/PROPoSED ED FACBJTIE9 ASARESMTULT OF PROTECT SIREEF RECONSTRUCTION 1%1090 1,955 SYSTEM ALL NSTOb1ER5 SAN ANGHA RL9TALLAHONOR Aug MSMEEbRWM REPLACE wSFRICFRI:OULATOR IIEPLACEb0i6TFOF 5TAFJON MFASI/REBEOR REGULATION Page 58 of 155 11 L 1 J ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 PRge57of 155 DESCRIPTION OF COMPLETED DATBPIACBD PROJECTS PUCED A' GAS W GAS UTWTY PROJECT UTIUTYP IFSERVICEOR NSTOM M PLAMBI NU 11 COST RE I)DMNG 2W BENEFTIED LOCATION PURPOSE OF PROJECT SERVICE l%1682G 5X2 RELOCATION OF FAC MES- ALL CUSTOMERS BRYAN RELOCAMI TOAVOM Apr REI-0CATEDISTR®UIION CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FACBJTIESATCREERCROSSWG PROJECT 19616910 7,351 SYSTEM 530VEMENTS- ALL CUSTOF A ILLS REPLACE Apr REPLACE 182 FF OF 4' CAST INFRASTRUCTURE B2ONPPE WTTR 182 FEEFOF 4' 1961/620 11,05 SYSTEM APROVESffFTTS- AUCUSTOMER3 ABB.EIJE REPLACE My REPLACE192FEETOF4-BARE OPRA.STRUCNRE SJEFYPPEW 192FEETOF4" 1%18686 10,591 SYSTPM DPROVEMOFTB- ALL CUS10M ABILIM REPLACE J. REPLACE365 FEETOF 4 -BARE 81FR,eSTRUCNRE SIFIIPPE WIIN365FEETOFC 19618990 457 NSTINCURREOWiTNTHE ALL NSTOb1Ht5 TFIrPLE COSTSWN w Feb REMOVAL OFFAMMS- REIDIOJ6 FACB.RPS A8ANDON403FEETOF2"BARE STBEI.. PPE AND 16 FFPT OP 2- PLASTICPPE 196192 938 SYSTEM B.PROVFMBNTS- ALL NSTOh s EUSTACE REPLACE biv REPLACE DETERIORAM INFRASTRUC UNDERGROIINDFAMO18S 1961%2G 5,860 B13TALLATIONOFPPEAND RESD3ENTW. NORTH SYSTE WANS10N Nw APPURTENANCES -INSTALL RICHLAND DUETONSTOM.ER DISTAB"ONFACDdTPS,WITH FmL GROWTH PART W. REB+®URSEMEFJT FROM RE VESTING CUSTOMER 19620206 2,593 INSTALLATIONOFPPSAM COAD.PR DALLAS SYSJEMERPANSION FW APPURTENANCES -DE CPER DUSTONSTOh WSTAJ 185FEETOF2' GROWTH PLASTIC PIPE FORTHE COMPANY 19621210 850 SYBT WPROVEhffNTS- ALL CUSTOMERS DALLAS REPLACE Feb REPLACE B FEET OF 3" WRAPPIID OffRASTEUCTURE SIPPEWITH]FEI:f OF 3` 1%2133(1 1,260 SYSS TEM COMMERCW. CRANDALL SYSTTOCUS ION Od AnONO OFTSU FORIS(MTIONOF OFFSJIE DUE TONSTOhPA MAINSUNS 435)FEETOF J' GROWTH PLASTIC PPE7, WTTR PARTIAL )' RED.RIURSoCUS ROSTWTSNG NST O 1%3100 89 C T ALL NSTOMERS IU16p.IN COSISINNRREDIN Feb VAL OFFDVl1TFITHE ABMOVALO1F REf1RING FACdIT1E5 OF2'BA E ABA�S=PH76159 0F2' STEFI. PPE, 158PEFTOF]' WRAPPED STEEL PPE, AND 102 FEETOFAMONOJC PPS 1%]3330 (14,517) AMCES PPEAND COb1MERCW. PLANO SYSTEMEAPAN310N On APPM B93TALL DUETOCUSTOLPR FEET OF 3' PLASTIC PPE, WITH FROM GROWTH RE0.IBUR$F IRBOVESTING NSTOMER 1962/330 2,296 SY ALL NSTOMER$ TEM1PLE REPLACE Feb ACF1PROVEOFr REPLACEE FEET20 2'BARE DIFAASTRUCHBP STEM PPE WFTH30FItT OF 3' 196245/6 11,180 SYSTEM PPROVEMENTS- ALL N3TOADFS PARIS REPLACE J. SEPLACE130 F4'BARE INFRASlI1UCIURE STE11 PPE WITH 130130£FEf OF a• 19624950 13A35 SYSTEM RPROVEMENCS- ALL NSTOLPRS GARLAND REPLACE IW REPLACE 100 FEETOF 4'WAAPPED 84'RABTRUCNRE 1962500 5j0 SYSIEMPPAOVELIENIH- ALL NSTObPRS EOGATA REPLACE lW REPLACE 101 FEE 06RASTRUCTURE IN OF $M PPEWITH104 FEET OF 3' i%25936 1,3M RELOCAMDIS ALL NSTObiFRS FRFDPRiCK3BU RELOCATIONTOAVOBJ Sep BA ONES- TSASIRIBUTION RG CONFl.ICTBVP0.0POSED FACM ASARESULT OF FAC PROJECT 0I NSIOMFA HEST 19626696 5,)9) RELOCATION OFFACD.ITB:S- ALLNSTOMERS BURNET RELOGTIONTOAVOm My RELOCATE SN CONFLICT WJPROPOSED FACD ASA MRESUTULTCIF Pit01ECF RU STREETRECONSTRUCIION PRge57of 155 • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Pape 58 of 155 DE ON OF Cvwti PLSCFD MUO9 PRO3ECTS PLACED IN GAS Gn5 Dl PROJECT IRIIITYPLANTINSERVICEOA NSI'O8(ERS P w NUMBER COST AETDIEDDURDiC10N BENEFITED LOCATION PURPOSEOFT ERVId Sm"a 19627156 19,00 RAOCATIONOF FACD,RIFS- ALL N$TONiFItS PRISCO RPLOCATIONMAVOAVOm May REI.00AT STR NNFLICT WI PROPOSED FAOD.ITSSA ARTS T WM PROJER STORM SEWER ION INSTALLATION ATF 1963"1G 5,62> D TIONOFFAN.FPffS- ALL NSTOM1PJtS �A RELOCATION TO AVAVOIDfm HM RELOCATE DISTRINUTION CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FACR AS A RE9di OF PROJECT DIST J AGE EDRCH CONSIRUCRON I%36 816 (1919) L INSTALLATION OF PPEANO COEAfERCW. ARLINGTON MERPA A,DUE APPURTENANCES -INSTALL DY WR ro NSroMER DISTRBUTJONFACDAiff$ WTTH GROWTH PARTIAL REP.®URSEb¢NI FROM RE UESTDJG MFR 1%28510 146,91] OF FA RELOCARONOFFACBPTPS- ALL NSTOAIDt3 DALLAS RELOCA AVOID Oct RE=[ESDISTR®UIION Wlm CONFl.ILT W/PROPOSED FAV[140 6 OF pROJECf DIUJRS E PAVING AND DRAINAGE PROTECT 19628786 25] INSiALLAl10N OFPP RFSIDpiRAL DALLAS SYST0SIGN Nov APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER O] DUE TOTO NnSIONIDt LED433 FEEFOF 2' GROWTH FLASn PLASTIC PPE AND 25 FEET OF 1• PLASTIC PPE FOR THE COI.PANY 19628936 36j78 RELOCATIOTO ALL NSTOMFRS I.AKFPORT RELOIawl Mry BUR.RPS- mO CONFLICT W/PROPOSm FAM]T1TEDISTR®UTION CROSSINGS FACRTIIFEMIOFF PROJECT i%29136 2,OM RQ.00ATIONO CI ALL NSTOI.OeS dFBUIWE RFlOCAT10NroAV0ID pec LJTII'l]ES- RELOCATE DISA URON CONFLICT W/PROPOSm FACdITPBASAltm OF PROTECT OOVERF01¢N[AL UPBT 19629/36 (114) ALLATTON OF PIP NMFVDtne, EJLLEEN STSIAIEXPANSION Mry APPURTENANCES - L 235 DUE TO NSI03ffR FFTALL FEEFOFI• PLASTICPPE, WRN 6ROWM RFAWURSAIEN'IFROM IRWUESTDIG CUSTOMER 1%29]26 20,915 INSTALLATION OF PPEAND COMh¢RCW. FORT WORTH SYSTEM EXPANSION JW APPNRENANCFS-DJSTALL DUE TONSroMQI OISTR®UTION FA� I GROWTH 19629966 10,906 RHDCATIONOFFACTLITIES- ALL CUST064R3 FORS WORTH RELOCATIONro AVOID Apt NNFLICT W/PROP09ED FASMMMASARESdTOF FAMli ITEMAaESUTN PROJECT NSTOMER HEST 19630636 3,5N STSCESIROVQ.0JI5- ALL NS'IONPRS STANFORD REPLACE Feb SFEETSF2"WRAPPED INFRASTRUCNPE SWEL STED. PPE WRH 8 FF]:1'OF2' 1%30710 015 SYSTEM B.PROVAfEMS- ALL CusronPR9 SANANGAO REPLACE Fcb CEIBSFEEIARE INFRASTRUCNRE STEELPPE WRH 185 185=FFPTOF 6' 1%30]46 13,852 SYSTEM 0.WR0VFI.fEN7S- ALL NSTOMERS SIPREIA.Y REPLACE Aug REPLACEDEIflt10RATID INFRASTRUCNRE UYSTEEMMKO FACR.RIE4 19630]60 9,635 SYSTEM DPROVl3r(ENSS- ALL CGsroMms NPPELL REPLACE Apr RUNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTURE 1%30916 1,123 SYSTAYSTEM J ALL CUSTOMERS ANSON REPLACE Feb 91A)ofIEMS- STP EFOF 3'BARE PPRASTRUCIURE LPIPE STEO.. PPE WRH 9 Ff£1'OF 3• 19631110 436 DISTALLATION OF PPE AND CDNRD]BCW. MCKINNEY SYSTEM EXPANSION JW APPURTE3 -DEVELOPER DILEroNSFORIDt INSTALLED J1g F1494 FtTOF Y GROWTH F PLASTICORTHE COMPANY 1%31986 675 INSTALLAA TION OF PPE AND COMMERCLLL DNVCANVn tP SYSTAIEXPANSION Apr APPUR[QIANC£N-INSFALL 115 pUE TOCUSTOMER FEETOF 2" PLASTIC PP$ WITH GROWTH PARRAI.RE0.IDUHSIT F0.0M RE NSroB ER 196320N5 2,195 RELOCATIONOFFACB.TIIES- ALL NSSO� FORT WORTH R�AImwl TO OR ROCATEDISTAISVIION EL m NNFLICTW/PROPOSFD FACdITIFS ASARESULTOF PROIKT COMMERCIAL DElE1.OPAffN'T Pape 58 of 155 • A • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 59 of 155 DESCw ONOFC0 LETED DAT[PIAC[D PROJECF5 PLACED w GAS wG,18Dry,Ry PROJECT UFRIFYPL INSERWCEOR NSFOMERS PWUM NUMBER COST RETRDSUOVWGUW BENEFEEED LOCATION PURPOSE OF PROJECT SERVICE 19632226 10,256 5YS]EM d@R0VE0JT5- ALL NSTOMERS MOODY REPLACE 61v REPLACE250FEETOF4'BARE FNFRASTRu=E STEEL P@E W 350 FEEP OF V 19632H0 3,815 COSTNCIIRRED `O[E ALLNSFOMERS WACO COSTSwCURREDw Feb REMOVALOFFACdI-REPBtE RETIXwG FACd S 4 FEEP Of 0A MON PIPE IM28IG 2,658 SYSTEM d@ROVEAffMS- ALLNSTOMFR8 SANANGELO REPLACE Feb REPLACE 120FEE[OF 3"BARE OVTASIRUCIURE SEELP@EW 120=OFY 19632950 (2,342) RELOCATFONOFFACdR@S- ALL CUSTOMERS CAA@RON RELOCAl30N TO AVOID Mu BELOCATEDUMBI OON CONFL=W/PROPOSED FACd1T@SASARESULTOF PRO= EXPANSION OF HIGH SCHOOL FACD.ITFES 19633170 WSTALLATIONOFP@EAMI RESIDENTIAL DALLAS SYSTEMEXP"mw lu1 APPURTFNANCFS-NSTALL 113 D1IETOCUSTONIDC FEEPOF3'PLAST2P@E,W GROWTH PART W. REdIDIIRSELff NI' FROM RE UESTDIGCUSIOhIDt 196N53G SYSTEM w@ROVFMENIS- ALL C115IOMER3 WWA PARK REPLACE Da L(349) REPLACE I6OFEETOF4"6TEFL D@RASTRUCNRE P@E WFPH 100 FEETOF 4' PLASTIC 19635486INSTALLATION OF P@EAND RESIDEN]lAL DALLAS SXUETO J JW APPURTENANCFS-DEVELOPER TOMEN DUE TOCUSTONIDt INSTALLEDEFOR FOFO GROWTH PLART'!C PR'E FOR TF@ COAffANY 196360/6 INSTALLATION OF POE NL CONNIFRCIAL PLANO SYSIEomvoSION E. EEST DUE TONSPOAfER DISMBENANCFS- EM, D15TR®UIION FAW.ITffS, WffH GROWTH PARTES REAIDURSE6fENi FROM 19636996 &534 RELOCATION OF FACdIHES- ALL CUSTOMERS MANSFIELD RELOCATFW/mPOOID My NNFLICF OSED FAME ESMAR®UTION FACdFF@SASARESULT OF MACE PRE@CP C1ISTOMER UESi 1963863 3,962 wSTALLATION OF P@EATN RESIDENFW. SEYMOIM SYSITOMKOMER My A DUE TONSTONffR 017ENANCE CPTELL PEES OFTPLASTCPPPE, GROWIEI PAR]L3L RE0.IDUBSEEER m £ROM RE UESFwG CUSTOMER 19638310 1,135 SYSTEM d@ROVEAAtfMM3- ALL CUSTOMERS ANSON REPLACE Feb REPLACIPE FEE118 BARE wFRASIRUCHPRE STEEL P@E 118 FEET OF 3' 1963%216 14,9M O ALL NSSOMFRS CANTON REPLACE May REPLACIb@AOVEMENTS- R�PLACROUHDFOR R9FRASTRUCIIIRE EE UNDERGROIRR1FACdli@S 19639126 IN wSTALLATION OF P@E ATR) COhR.@]fCW. PLANO SYSTEMEXPANSION J. AFPURTENANCFAMEE ALL DUETONSFOMER IS DTRFBUFIONFACdIFIPS, WIFH GROWTH PERF W. �URSEMEN t FROM UFSPwC CUSTObffR 19639266 6,H8 SYSTEMOER ALL C113'FOM1@RS SNYDER REPLACE Mu ORETOS- REPLACEDEFEBFORATFD INFRASTRUCNRE UNOER6ROIJNDFAC 1961W26 3,J30 ME NwMIRFDWHHTI@ST ALL NSTOb@RS ABdENE COSTS wCURREDw Feb REMOVAL FACd REIDtB.G EACILHIER IS ON RYSTEMOISTRIBUTION 19640016 ],183 SYSTEMIMP ALL NSIOA@R5 MUENSTER REPLACE May ORANIS- REPLACEOEPFRFORAIED INFRASTRUCIUIIE UNDERGROUTB)FACUAi@S 1961006C O,6]9 SYSTEM d@ROVEMENTS• ALL NSTOA@RS ABdENE REPLACE Aug REPLACE OF 4" CAST IT@PASIRUCTURfi D 1991 IRON POE MAND 191 FEET30 BARESFE WDH30)FEET 196100869.7N SYSTEM IWRO0 MENTS- ALL CUSTOMERS AB6ENE REPIACE lm RFPLACE213213 F13TOF4"BARE INFRASTRUCTURE STEEL P@E WITH 213 FEEF OF I' Page 59 of 155 • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DMSION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 20D3 Page 60 of 155 DESORPTION OF COMPLETED MYgP m PROJECTS PLACED 0 GAS wcm DTBIFY PROJECT UTTLRYPLANTINSERWCEOR NSTOMERS PL w NU m COST MTIREDDURMG20R3 BENEFTTRD IgCATION PURPOSE OF PROJECT SERVICE 1964031G 10,528 SYSTEM D.PROVEMENB- ALL CUSTOS BRYAN REPLACE Apr REPLACE 15o FEETOF 4' BARE INFRAST'RUCNRE STE].PPE WTI}I150FEETOF9' 19690376 149341 RELOCATTONOFFAMmes- ALL CUSJOMERS DALLAB RELOGTIONTOAVOB) JW RELOCATE DISTR®UT1ON COI JaW/PROPOSED FAMMIMASAMMTOF PROJECT PAMO OPERATIONS 196410]6 11,881 SYSIPMU.PROVEEIFMS- ALL CVBTOMFRS ABB.ENE REPLACE 3W REPLACE]36 FEET OF P BARE PPMSTITUCIURE STEEL PPE WTFH D6 FEETOF4' 19611396 8,522 SYST ]RIPROVEhffMS- ALL CUSTOE]ERS MgRLO1 REPLACE Apr REP MDETERIORAMD W]USTRUCNRE UNDERGROUND FAMMES 1964152G 3,818 RELOCATIONOFFACM ES- ALL CUSTOMERS Tfl.PLE MOCATIONTOAVOM Aub RELOGTEDIST]UHWION CONFLICTW/PROPOBED FACdO ASARESULTOF MO= CUSTOMMREQUM 19643390 89 OISTALLATIONOFPPEAND COEAIQI9CLLL MCKDDffiT SYSTEM EXPANSION Dec APPURTENANCES-B4STALt BS DUETO CUSTOMER FEETOFYPLASITCPD'E WFFN GROWTH PARTIAL RE61BUd9Et.B:39T FROM M GCII6TOAODT 19M244G 4,285 INSTALLAT)ONOFPPEAND RESD3ENTW. F�SVBJ.E SYSTEM EXPANSION Apr APPURTENANCES-wSTALL 50 DUETOCUSTOF¢R FEETOF2-PLASTICP]7E GROWTH 1964253G 1,596 SYSTFMd1PROVEMENTS- ALL CUSTOMMS AUSTIN SYSTEM EXPANSION Aub FORTIFICATION OF OFFSITE DUETOCUSTOEfER M SQNSTALL2?55FEEFOF3' OROWIH PLASTIC PEEL WI]H PARTW, RE0.IBURSEMENTFROM G COSTOMp 19642586 32]36 RMOCATIONOFFAC61TiE4- ALLCUSTOE DUISANVn rP RFLOCATIONTOAVOM Apr RELOGTEDISTR®NITON COIU'LICf W/PROPoBED FACd1TPS ASARESULT OF PROTECT STREETRECONBTRUCIION 1%13686 23,962 SYSTEM - ALL CUStOMPRS ABdENE REPLACE Apr REPLACE196FEETOF6•BARE "dFMOF6- II4FRASIItUCIURE STF]d PPE, 68 F OF4• BARE D6 SIEEI.PPEAND6FEETOF PLASTICPPEWRR 416FEET 6• PLASTIC PPE AND 69 FEET OF 4 4' I969303G 11,983 SYSTENIDPROVEM1PMS- ALL CUSTOhPA3 AB6ENE REPLACE J. REPLACE 3]S FEEIOF9•CAST DPRASIRIICIURE IRONPPE WFO13984' 196433tt3 732 MES RFLOCATIONOFFAMCD.ITPS- ALL CUSTOMERS BRUSITYCREIX SMOCATIONTOAVOID Mer RELOCATSASDRESULT CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FACd OF PROTECT ISAEESULT EASEMPNFISSl1E5 19643466 153,656 SY51 PROVEMENT$- ALL CUSTOMERS DALLAS REPLACE JW REPLACE 165 FEEL OF %'CAST RPRASTRUC[URE TRONPPE 19643926 743 D RO222FEET ALL CUSTOEIDtS GLENN fP]GMS SYREFM EXPANSION Aug FORTM PoR UON O OFFSW OF OFFSITE DUE TOOUSTOFIDt (INSTALL MAINS (INSTALL 4" PLASTIC PIPE), GROWDi' WITH PARTS. X T GCU FROM RE VESTING CUSTOSTO6ffR 19691006 3,8H DJSTALLATION OF PPEAND RESl� ENVIRONS SYSTMEXPANSION AR APPURTLM NCFAMMES DUE iOOUSiOMER DI9TEIV[ NFACB GROWTH 196/5196 IOO,I55 S- SYSTEMU60FM ALL CUSTOMERS DALLAS REPLACE JW FrB REPLACE 60FETT OFB'BARE DPRASTRUCIURE STID.AND20FEETOF WRAPPED SIEII,PIPE WI1H'h FEET OF 6' PLASTIC PPE Atm 80 FEET OF P 19645346 9,152 STSTEMB.PROVEEfENTS- ALL CUSTOMERS PALLOR RE a My REPLACE I1O FEETOF 4' WRAPPED PPRASTRUCR3RE STEEL PPE WRH 110 FEET OF 4 - Page 60 of 155 4 • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 61 of 155 DESCR ON OF COMPLETED M3EPLACED PROTECIB PL4CED P GAS pGA3pTLIFY PROTEGE UTdTIVPLANTBJSERVICEOR COSFOMERS I PLANTA NU8IHER COSI' RETIRED DO G BENEFTFED I TION PGRPpSEOFPROFRCT =mE 1965100 On MTALLAnON OF PIPE AND REmENnAL IOWA PARR SYSJEMEXPANMON Da APPURTENANCES-DSFALL 118 DUETONSTOA FEEFOF2'KL CPIPEW GROWIA PAR REO.pUR3E FROM FLBQMTING CUSTOMER 1%5%IG 59$0 SYSTEMO.IPROVE61Q ALLCU6TOMFBS FORTWORTIS REPLACE Apr REPLACE DETERIORAM wFu=RUCInRE UNOEROROUNDFACd= 1%54556 24,622 SYSTWA dIPROVELffiME- ALLCUSTOMERS GARLAND REPLACE Sep RP3LACE DEFERIORATED mFRASTRuC UNDEROROUND FACd1TTEs 1%55WG 2,812 PSTALLAnWOFPIPBAND RESIDENffAi. ARLINGTON sysh MMON JW APPURTENANCES-wnS DUETOCUSTOF DISTR BI ONFACdTDE4, WR21 OROWTII PARTIALRED.pURSEMENFFROM UETING CUSFOMER 1%5532G 6,222 RELOCAnONOFFACdFI1F5- ALLCUSTOM}AS WACO RFI.00AnONTOAVOm Ap RElOCATEDISTR® ON CONFLICFW/PROPOSED FAC6FDESASARESULTOF PR ma CUSTOMER UEST 1%56040 M0261 SYSTEM dIPROVEMENTS- ALLCUSTOM1 FORTWORJN REPLACE Sep RFP aDETERIORATFD OIFRPSIRUCIIIRE UNDERGROUNDFACOrnFe 1%5615G 2,854 WSTALLATIONOFPIPE AND REmENFW. SAINF1O SYSTEM EXPANSION 1® APPURTENANCE-WSTALL 100 DUETO N3IDIAER FEEFOFr MASnCPIPE GROWTH 1%56480 13,215 RELOC nONOFFAMd - ALL CUSTOF GEOROEIOWN RELOCATIONTOAVOD mo RELOCATE DLSMB® ON CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FACR.FF FARESULTOF PROTEGE EXPANSION OF UNIVERSITY FACdFIFE 1%5mG 3,OT9 SYSTEMISiPROVEMEMR- ALL CUSTONIPRS BROWNWOOD REPLACE Jun ABA£IDON475FEET0£6'CAST INFRAS3RUCNRE MW PIPE AND REPLACE 248 FEEF �OF OF r sCREW P@E WFIH 250 FEEF r PLASTIC FIPE 1%n530 5,21)8 SYSTEMPIPROVFDdN15- ALL CUSTOMERS RICNARDSON MSTA MON OR An REPLACEDISDUaC ULATOR REPLACQ.IINFOF SFAnON MFASUREBffFTFOR REGULATION M510WO 6,580 RELOCATION OF FACd= ALLCUSTOMFRS FORTWORTN RELOCAnON ro AV M RELOGTEDISMBMON W Ia WJPROPOSM FACILITIESASAREULTOFBOAD PROJECT RECONSTRUCTION 19658550 31.833 RELOCATIONOFFACdF - ALL CUSFOMERS GEORGETOWN RELOCAnW TO AVOD An FMOCATEDLSMB® ON COMT.ICFW/PR sm FACdITIEASARESULTOF PROJECF DRIVEWAYCONSTRUCTJON 1%502G 2,730 RFJDCAnOFe OFFACd=- ALL CUSTOMERS WICIBTAFALLS RELOCAnONTOAVOM An RELOCATEDISMB=ON CONFLICF W/PROPoSID EACdTnESASARESMTOF PROJECT cu Nn TJFST 19659350 189,)32 O RECO ALL CUSIOM0L5 ABdENE REI.00AnONT N. TEDISMB=1TIPS� TEDISTR®UIION SED CON£LCFW/PROPOSED FACIL FACdJTIEASARESUMT PROSECF UET GOVERNMON 1%59HG 1,659 OF RELOCATIDNOFFB=ONE ALL NSTOA015 F@ARtp nONTOAVOm Mry RFLOCAIEDISTR®1MT MbTFL CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FACdIT1E3AS AAESULT OF PROTECT BASEMEN ISSUES I&,2H RELOCATION OF FACRFIms- ALL CUSTOLpRs )RVPG RELO AVSDMULTCONFLICTW/PROPOSED WIPR FACdiTiESASARETJLTOF 1W'9'7 GOVERNMEN'FALRE UEST28,756 SYSTEM - ALL CUSTOAA@RRS MANO0. SYSTIIAERPANSION Sep FORnFIC nOFI FOFTS DUEro OUSTOMER PARFOFFSDE MAP'S WITH PARTIAL GROWRT REPIDURSFMFNTFROM Page 61 of 155 • CI • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2DD3 Page 62 of 155 DESCRU�FION OF COWUM DATLP m PROJECFS PL "Uw 0As wGAButYIT' PROQR= 1JTR.RYPLANTw SERVICEOR NSTOMERS PL6NTw Nw m cost RETIAEDDUR1N Ml BENEFPIED LOCATION PURPOSROFPROI SERVICE 196W12G 5,836 REIACATONOFFAC6=- ALLCURMM MARBLEFALLS RIIOCATIONTOAVOD) 1.Lr RELOCATEDISTR MON CONFLICT W/PROPOSD FACD.ITIF_4ASARESOLTOF PROJECT DEVELOPER MT 196623W 217 INSTALLATONOFPIPEAND CONiNffR DALLAS SYSTFMID(PANSION Aug APPURTENANCES-lbin LL 380 DUETOCOMMER FEETOFTPLASIICPWF, WRH GROWTH PART W. REUIDURSES@NN'[FROM RE UESTING CUSroMER 19663106 3,381 II COSTwCa=FACITHTIDi ALL CUSTOMEIt3 TAWLE COSTSw AF REMOVALM FACB.IFW RETIRDIG EACR.11'OiS FARME MFW 6' ABANDON TO WRAPPED STFJB. PWE AND MEIFB wSTALLATON 19663516 3,958 SYSTEMIMPROVFAATED ALL NSTOMERS PALESTwE EP RLACE ld REPLACEDETFRIORATED DWRASTRUCNRE UNDERGROUND WS 19663W0 b,T3 FP IPE ATON OF PD'EAND COMMERCW. GREENVR.LE May "17UR 300 DUETOMITO]SION DUBro QISTOMER FUTOFENANCTICMT, FEETOP 2•PLASTC POE.T4]ERS, GROWTH AND REGULAroRS WITH PAR]IAL REPDURSEL411TF UESTDJ6 ME 1966/016 N OF PIFFR wSTALLATON OF PWE AND COJAMERCLV, ABdENE SYSTEMEJWANSION Aug APPIJRTENANCBS-wS DUEro OUBTOMB0. FA , WfiN GROWTH REIMBUUTON FR.IT�9, ROM TINGCUSroMER 1966/186 SYSTEM OWROVEMENIE- ALL CUST061flLS TEMPLE REPLACE AF [31,C6 RPWLACE228FFfT OFT RJFRASTRUCIURE OF T STEd POE OFr 1%61656 N OF FDIFEET RMOCATEDIM[ACDITWS- ALL CUSTOSSIERRS BURNET RELOCATONroAVOD AR RECO CONFLIRW/PROPoSEO MIASIRREO T FAC61TIEMFIS SULON PROJECTSIRFETI IRUCIION19669676 IWRO SYSTEM UWROVEMEMS- ALL CUSTO8IIR3 ROCKWALL FORTWICATON OR Oq REPLACE1,750FPT W2•PLASTC SYSTEM 0.WROVFANNT PWEWRH6•PLASTCPWE 1%65596 8.612 MST nON OF PTE AND COAw1ERC1AL SULPHUR SYSTEM ESPAFIXON Mer APPURTENANCE4-MSTALL SPRINGS DUETOCUSTONIER DIMBUTONFAW.3TJ65 GROWTH 19665850 5,810 RML TIONOFFAMIT01- ALL CUSroN1ER5 HEWTR RELOCATIONTOAV Apr RMOCATEDIMUSUTION COFDT.IR WIPROPOSm FACO.THESASARPSULTOF PROJECT GOVERNNffN 196665/6 6,116 RELOCATONOFFAC0.13ffS- ALLCUSJONffR3 BRUCEVILLE RFIOCATONTOAVOD AF RELOCATEDMMBUT10N EDDY CONFLIRW/PROPOSED FACRITIBSATCRFFR CROSSING PROJECT 19667066 6.103 SYSTEMI WROVEMENTS- ALL CUSTOMERS DALLAS REPLACE Mer REPLACE91E TOF12'WRAPPED INPRASTRuC 1%68096 1,918 INSTALLATONOFPIPEAND RFSDEMW. SONIFRV SYSTEM E]WANSION AF APPURTENANCES-INSTALLIW DUETOCUSTO FEETOF P PLASOC PWE GROWTH 966 18110 21,718 SYSM[I WROVFA,iLMS- ALL CUSi0MER5 DEMSON REPLACE JW RE3MACE330FE170F3'STEEL wFRA33IUJCIVRE PWE WITH)30FEETOF3'PLASTC 1%6857G (9) WST LATONOFPWEAND COMMER GEORGETOWN SYSTEM ERPANSION May APPURTENANCES-INSTALLK DUETOCUSTOMER FEET OF T PLASTIC PWF, WUH GROWTH REN0®URSEM1WIJTFROM UFSlN1G=OLWR I%6868G 2,9M SYSTEM O.WROV@.1ENT5- ALLNsmM ENVwONS REPLACE AW REPLACEISFEETOF2'BARE INPMSTRUCTURE STEFI ME WI'JH IS FEETOF2• 1%A)IG 2.818 RELOCATIONOFFACDRWS- ALL CUSTOMERS CARROLLTON RELOCATIONTOAVOD AF RELOCATE DISTR®UTON CONFl.iR W/PRoPo FA�ASARMULTOF PRO= GOVERNI.frNTAi REQMT Page 62 of 155 • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 63 of 155 DFSCRDTION OF COMPLETED DAMP MD PROJECTS PLACED a GAS W G.6SU'IMP PROJECT DTH.TJYPIAF MSERVICEOR NSTOMERS PIANTN' NU80PR COST REiIREDDURDIG2M BENEFITED LOCATION PURPOSEOFPROJECT 6EAY1¢ 1%]0800 5,311 SYS�O�- ALL CUSTOSIER.S BECTON REPLACE Apr REPLACE 2FEEFOF V BARE DDRASIRUCNRE SLID. PPEAND CHANGE OUT 1%TL4W 7,058 SYSTBMR.WROVELffNIS- ALLCUSTObiFAS SANANGELO REPLACE FW REPLACE 327FEETOF T BARE DiFRASIRIICNRE STEEL PME WRH317FEET OF 3' 1967465G 27,6% SYSIYMRFPAD83-REPLACE ALL CUSTOO DEMON INSTALLATIONOR Oct VALVEDJSD)EMEASI3RDiG REPLACEMENT OF STATION biF.ASURPIr4NTm REGULATION 1967472G 5$52 SYSTEM IWROVEMEMS- ALLNSTOM HLLLSIO O REPLACE May REPLACEDETERIOMMD DTSTRUCTURE U MGROUNDFACD.IDES 1%74%0 8$W SYSIEMISiPROVEMEME- ALL NSTOMERS SANANIJELO REPLACE My REPLAM214=0134-BARE DJFRASTItuC STEJ]. M)2 WITH 214 FEFTOF Y 1%75NG 3,145 SYSTIWMR0VEA4M3- ALL CUSTOMERS COLLEGE REPLACE May REPLACE IN FEET OF 3' STEEL STATION WFMSTRUCHJRE 1%75860 9,375 COSTDJCURREDWTD3 ALL CUSTOMERS BRYAN COS]S OJCIMRID IN Mry REMOVAL OF FACIL=- REN OFAC6TIlES ABANDON 300 FEETOF V EB S= ME 196/5%0 12,455 SYSTEMD OVE6fEMS- ALLCUST02APE5 SAN ANGELA REPLACE Apr REPLACEMIF TOF3'BARB DiFRASTRUC STEEL POEWTTH700FFETOF2' 1%76130 2,T21 RELOCAHONOFFACLLITIE4- ALL CUSTOhIDtS IRVRJG R OCATIONTOAVOR3 J. RELOCATE DISTR®UIION CONFLICTWlPROPOSED FACLLRIFSASABESIB.TOF PROJECT GOVERNMFMAL RE 1%76296 1,921 EVSTALLAHON OFPBTA COSAff2eCW- GREENVD.LE SYSTEM EXPANSION May APPURTENANC 155 DUE TONSTOF]ER TECMTALL FEET OFPPLASTICPIPE, WITH GROWTH PART W. RED.IDURSEMEM FROM RE SDIG CUSTOMER 1%T74G 1,8N COSTIlVCURRm WIITEMALLUemMERS FORT WORTH COSTS DICURREDP` S<p REMOVAL OF FACLLTOES- RETDNiOFACLLRGS REMOVED16ttt®UHON 1967/9/6 2,331 RELOCATIONOFFACR.THES- ALL NSTOMERS WWOWAY Ma RELOCATE COMICT1WIMMOID NNFLIPR W/PROPoSID ASTR®URON FACLL[TES AS A RESULT OF PROTECT GOVERNS4NTA1 196783IG 16p22 INSTALLAHON OF PPEAND ALL NSTW.0i3 PFLUOERVLLLE SYSTNSION May APPURTENANCES -INSTALL DUETOCRO USS T DLSTR®UTION FACLLTIIEE, WTD3 GROWTH P�URSF2.4HT FROM REQUFBIRJO CUSIOTffR 196]BSKr 6,367 SYSTIId O5PR0VFAJFRTE- ALL NSTOMERS SANANOFLO REPLACE MD REPLACE 3I DiFRASTitUCNRE IIIF4'BARE STEEL.PUT 111OFTBARE STEEL.ICF WITH31FEET OFP PLASOAC AND111 FEEL OF 3' 1%)940(: 13,3N RELOCAn OF ALL NSTOM1ml3 BECTON RELOCATIONTOAVOm Apr DISTFACD.RDS- RELOCAT STR®UDON CONFLICT W/PROPogO S A FACD.ITIES ASARFSULTOF PROJECT STREETRFCONSTRDCDON 1%80196 36$05 R ALL NSTOS4R9 DALLAS RELOCATIONTOA Oa OCAHONOFF UT[ONS- TEDISTRESUT CONFLImo PROPOSED FAOL RESULTOF FACLLHIE PROJECT D PAVMG AND DRADUGE PROJECT 1%8106 45,393 D13TALLATION OFPBE AND RE9mENTIAL GEORGETOWN SVSIEMEXPANSION Q1 APPURTENADM DEVELOPER DUE TOOUSTOMER OISTALLEDDL9TR®U GROWTH OW FACO.RIES FOR HP COMPANY ]%81886 2,351 WSTALLAHON OF A RESmENIW. THORNDALE SYS'IEMEXPANSION Apr APPURTENANCFS-NSTL O UETDNSTOSIER DISTItBMiONFAC]=S.LLTTDS, WITH GROWTH PgRTLLLRE0.5BURSFA.ffITTTT FROM RE VESTING CUST08MERR Page 63 of 155 r L� 11 ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 64 of 155 DESCRIFFION OF CUWLEMD MTEFLAm PROTECTS PLACED w GAS w GABIRRPyP PH0.IECI IDTWTYPW OSERVICEOR CDSLOMERS PL w NIIINEB COS[ RETIRED DD G2003 BENEFRED LmATION PORPOSEOFPROTECP SERVICE I%8211G 56,137 RELOCAMONOFFACO.RIBS- ALL CUSTOMERS DALLAS RELOCATION IO AVOID Jw RFLOCATEDIST BIHION CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FACB.TT'QSASARPSULTOF PROIECf sl A ow MARL 19682300 9,57I RF ATJONOFFACMIFS- ALL CUSTOMERS BFLTON REIACATION TO AVOID AP RELOCATBDISTS][BIJIION CONELICF W/PROPOSED FACRITR-S AS A RESULT OF PROLECI' STREEFPROJFCT 19682430 T2,443 RJIOCATIONOFFACd1TP5- ALL CUSIT9MQL4 CADDO MMLS RELOCATION TO AVOID J. RELOGTEnISTIUBVITON CONFLICF W/PRoPOSF)D FACB.RPSASARFSIILTOF PROTECT STREEFR RUCIION 196820 T17 B5TATIMOAN AL CISOM PFLUG1AV YMEANSION O - ANANCESINSTAL DUETONSTO DBTR11BRONFAff,W OROWIH PEOM REE,OUR.WER mwIIESTDIO CUSTOAffR 19684090 1,410,845 ALL CUSTON4RS DALLAS REPLACE Oct RWLA E3,970VEMENFS- REPLACE 1NPRAS'IRUCNRE 0F4'EETOP6'AM5 1,049FEETOF 4'GSF 812 TEEL OP 6'WRAPPEDSTEEL,AND 1]5 PPE 175 OF 6' BAR PLASM 96 6"PLASTICPSE, 3,FI996 0FOF 3,4]9 FEEL OF P PLASTIC PPE, YPLASTIC PPE AMTALU 1%84900 3,323 MSTALLAT ON COMMfRCW. FLOWER EXPANSION Oq CES-PEAND APPIJRTENANCE4-INSTALL MOUND DILE TONSTOMF]t Dmm DISTIU W GRO WTH LRMIURSEtr1ENFFItOFACR.RIFS, o PARTM. REB48M REQMTDIG CUSTOM1PIt 19686230 4% RESIDENTIALSYSTEMEXPANSION AprURTENANCES -MSTALL 225 mom DUETOCUSTOEfERolko ET�AMONUPWA]M TRTLALRED.IDIIRSE FROM aaoUESlBJO CUSTOMER 1%8915G 2,188 RELOCATJONOFFACLLITIE.S- ALL CUSTOMERS FORTWORTH RELOCATION TO AVOID Apr RFJACATEDISTRIB TW CONFI.ICFW/PROPOSED FACB.FFffSASARESULTOF PROJECF GOVERN80lFAl. RBQUEST 19689240 12,653 ROACATION OF FAMITIES- ALL CIISTOhPRS FORTWORTN RELOCATIONTOAWM May RELOCATE DISTRIBUTION CONFMCT w/PROPOSED FACDLTPSASARESULTOF PROJECT STREEFRECONSTRUCHON 1%8948G 11,824 RELOCATION OF FACB.RIES- ALL CUSTOMERS MESQUITE Md TIONTOAVOM Sep REIOCATEDISTRIBUTION CONFLICFW/PROPOSED FAC0LTP5 AS A RESULT OF FROJECF DRAINAGEPROJECT 1968WIG 3,384 SYSTEM NPROVQ4EM3- ALL CUSTOMERS SANANGELO REPLACE MR REPLACE 122 FEEF OF VBARE IIffRASIRUCNRE STEELPPEw 122FEBFOFP 1969W 21,418 WSTA1LAT10N OF PPE AMI R M=AL FORTWORTR SYSTTTIIOPANSION Dec APPN8III4ANCE5-DEVELOPER DUBTOCUSTOMFIt WSTALI.ED 4,550EEETOF Y GROWTH PLASTICPPE6,001FPF 3' PLASTIC PPE, 3,5]8 FEET OF C PLASTIC PPE 2,521 FEET OF V PLASTIC PPE AND 5,]50 FEEF OF 0.75" PLASTIC PPEFORTIIE 19691084 13,86]RdOCATIONOFFACLLITPS- ALLCUSTO61ER5 SICHARDSON RELOCATONMO M J. RECOCATEDISMIBU ON C ICFw/PROPoSED FACRITPS AS A RESULT OF PROJECT CUSTOMER USST 19691040 10,588 SYSTEM OPROVEI.ffEHS- ALL CUSIO8PR5 SIPRMAN REPLACE Mey RFPLACEDEIERIORATID INFRASIRUCNRE UNDERGROUFIDFACOrrme 1991050 13;62 SYSTEM PPROVESffNTS- ALL CUSTOOffRS SIIEINIAN REPLACE AK REPLACE DEFERIORATED ORR MUMRE IJNDERGROUFID FACO mct Page 64 of 155 • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 65 of 155 DESCR ON OF COWUMB WTEPWCFD PR0.IF.CTSWSS p6,1g1�TRUy. PROJECT URLI'IY PTANFIN SERVIKRVI CE OH NSFOMERS PWNTp' NUMBER RETRIEDDURING3003 BENEro LOLT PURPOSE OFPHOIECF 6ERVICE 19691326 4,2M 4}61 SYSTEMD.flROVEMENTS- ALL CUSTOMERS COLEMAN REPLACE Apr REPLAME FEEFOFPBARE HiiRASTItUCNRE STEEL PPE WITH 240 FEET OF E' 19691836 13,6% SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS- ALL NSTOMFRS WAXAMCH@ REPMCE Mq REPLACE112FEEF OF125'STEET. UJFRASIRUCIVRE PPE WFIH 112 FEETOF T PLASTIC 19693896 1,012,893 SYSTAII ALL NSTOMERS DALLAS REPLACE Da 439=CH'12' REPLACE 438 FFEFOF 12' WFRA.1-IRU(.TURE WMfFJ.PPE,145FI£FOF 12" BARE BAMS STET]. PPE, 58UB£EETOF 10"CASTRPP,M FEEFOF 8• CAST UtONONPPEFEET OF 8' BARESTEEPIPE, e5 F F6• CAST UtONPPl:385FE oF 6' 1%93266 2,452 SYSTEMIAIPROVAIFNTS- ALL CUSiOMENS NEWCASTLE REPLACE My REPLACEDEFE WFRASTRIICHIRE UNDERGROUNDFACFACD.ITPS 1%94126 3,115 RELOC S- ALL CUSTOMERS WA):AHACH@ REEOX7pwf Mfr MDISFFH=ON RpACATEDTSTR[B1ITTON ROMSM CONFLICT WEPROPOSED FU.FFPS ASARESULi OF MAN PROIEC[ HOLEREPLACENH?IT 1969/2/6 17,603 SY 1A1PROVE0F2'B ALL CUSTOMERS SAN ANOFEO REPLACE J. A REPLACE360 DR'IUSTRUCIURE 260F2•BARE STEEL PPE 260 FEET OP 2• 19694316 ;405 SYLAC DJP=OF3lFS- RO ALL CfISTOAPHS MUTON REPLACE A1v REPLACE 3IFEE31 BARE UJERASTAI.'CIURE STEEI.PIPEPRO 31FF 3• 19694336 11$33 - SYSTASTMPBOVEMENFS- ALL CGSFGMFRS SANANGELO REPLACE Aug REPLACE165 4'BARE pFM$IR{ICITIRE STEEI. PPE WITHMIM 165 FEEF OF 4' 1969M10 561 SYSI£M0.PR ALL CUSTOMERS WICFUTA FALLS REPWCE Mar OF2-TS- REPLACE40FEETOFTBARE DPAASIRIRTUR6 STEEEI.PPEN 2' 19696]JO 6,085 OF AFEETOF RdOGT10NOFFACe ALL NSTOMERS IXVOJG RELOCATIONTOAVOm Apr REfACATBDISI ON CONFLICF WEPROYOSED FMMTN FACD.RPSASARESULTOP PROTEGE STORMDRPR WSTALMTION i%94]86 1,601 S Af0.P ALL NSTOMERS ABU.EFR REPLACE Mar DRAMS- REPLACEDET MTED PPRASIRUCRINE F UNDERG"Rcp FACH.TTIFS 196%lEG 5,6]A SYSTEM R.PROVEMENT$- ALLCUSTOMF]f.5 NASICANA REPLACE Apr REPLALEDE[ MTED DPRASTRUCMIE F UNDERGROUND ACHFIPS 19695320 3,010 P'STALLA]ION OFPPEAND RPSmEN'ML RENO-LAM.1R SYSTTOMTOSION Jw IN APPURTENANCES -STALL CO. DUE TOCUSTOMER DISTRIBIFIION FAC'ILIHES, WITH GROWTH PARTIAL RED.IDURSET.@FF FROM TDeGNSTOMER 1%95656 ;471 R35TALMTION OFPPEAND RAU)EMIAL WICMIA FALLS STSTSION Apr APPURTENANLFS-DISTALL DUE TOMSTOTONSTOMER DISIRIBUTIONFACR.ITTFS 6ROWIN 1969SJIG 5,6]] SYSlAf P1PR ALL CUSTOMERS NRSICANA REPMCE ELy RlomM8- REPLACE DEIEIUOMTID 1NFRASTIIUCIURE UNDERGROUNDFACU.ME 19695RG 1363] CDSTINLUFAWFIH THE ALL CUSTOMERS WAN COSTS DiCAR APr REMOVAL OF FAW.FTPS-RETIXE TpI4 RECDtINGEACR.TIP3 57FEEF OF 10' CAST PPE, M�M MM E. 616 FE1`4-C CMONP F.15040 FEEFOF4"CASEFM PPE,150 FEEF OF 6' WRAPPED STEEL PPE, AND 156 FEET OF 2" WRAPPED 19695906 ]I,TJO SYSIEMD.PR=0F4'S- ALL NSNMERS WACO REPLACE Dec REPLACE FEEFOP4'CFW UIFBASIRIJCTVPE IRONPPE AND 330F20 OF6" A PLASTIC PPE WFIH920 FEETOF 3' Page 65 of 155 CJ CJ r -IL ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 66 of 155 DESORPTION OF COAfP PROJECPS PLACED w GAS DAIY PIACED PROJECT IITd1YYPLAMwsERVICE OR CUSI'OMEBS w GASD1D.ITP P m NUB®EB COSI RETIRED OURw'G3003 BENEP[IED LOCATION PURPOSEOFPBOJSCP 6ERYM8 19696950 1,83) RELOCATION OF FACaff ALL NETOA CAMERON RdOCATIMTOAVOM Ap Md TEDZMEBI MON CONFLICTW/PRWQSED FACd=ASARE9ULTOF PROTECT STRBBTPROJECT 19699960 2,055 SYSTEM 55 OVF]HENTS- ALL NSTOMERS ALBANY REPLACE My REPLANWFETTOF2'RARE a8'RASIRUCTIRIE SI FWEWRHMF OFV IW=10 2,181 SYSTIMIMPROVEA . Ad NSTOEffR3 gpNANGdO REPLACE Ap REPLAN4DFEET OF 3• BARE w£wsrRucruRE SYS P@E WDHbFEEF- 3^ 19)00610 1,361 SYSTEMB.iPR ALL NSTO0.tER.S FEwRIET'IA REPLACE My REPLA OF2'BB- OF2•BARE RUCTURE 19900800 29,460 ATION OF D AT[W ALL CUSTOBORS LEANDER YSMI SYSTEM ERPANSION May APPM 11IST APPURTENANMTICPTTALL340 DUETROWH ffR FEET OF2^PLASTSCPDE, GROWTH PARTW.R m GIMISTBEM1IDP[FROM RE UBSTDO NSTOEIFR 19)022)0 II,TSB RELOCATION OFFACE.[[w$- ALL CUSTOMERS OLENROSE O Ap RdOCATEDLSTit®U co =OIPROPO D CONPLICC WIPROPoSED FACB.1'IgS AS A RE$Ia,T W T PROSECT STREEr PROJECT 19)02540 (4j38) d ONOFFAC NM CHpRDSON OAHONTAVOID Au MO`O51XV5UB0)4 CONICW/RomsD FAAAaE!IIBTOF PROC EASONMDGNq PAC6I ME 19)03380 4,$53 SYSTEMO OVd¢NIS- ALLCUSTO6 ABE.ENE REPLACE Ap REP MUFEETW4^CAST IXON wFRASTRUCNRE PWEAtm16F OF4•BARE ST F[?EWRHMFEETOF4^ I4Ram 108.780 SYSTEMIMPROVEMENTE- ALL NSTOMER$ WACO REPLACE I)a REPLACE 1,033 FEET OF 6' CAST wFRASTRUCIURE MONPBE AND 1 14 PEETOF 4^ CASTMNPIPE WRH;537FEEP OP2'1?]WITICM 19)06046 5,619 RELOCATION OFFAC6ITTE5- qd CUSTOMERS LEWISVn ra RdO UONTOAVOD Aug Md TEDISTRIBISOON CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FACEJTIESASARESULTOF PROJECT GOVERNA¢NTAL pxoUEST IMX30 3,106 WSTALLATIONOFPWEA RESmEMIAL SF@RAIAN SYSTFMEXPANSION Ape APPURT6NANCFS-MTALL DUETONSTOIWR DISTRIBUTION FACLLITtFS I GROWTH 19)0]320 7,055 SYSTEM OVEBfENTs- ALL NSTOMERS WACO REPLACE Ap REPLACE IN FELT OF 4- BARE wFRASTituC ST PTE WITH 120 FEET OF 4• 19ro8410 319 COSTwNRREDWITHTHE ALL CUSTo. SA memo COSTSwCURREOw Ap REMOVAL OF FAMOM- RETIRIN(' PACDJTIES AHA NI)FEETOF2• WRAPPEDS'IID,PIMPHT FEET OFT" PtPB 19]086)0 855 RELOCATIONOFF NOIFFA ALL NSTOMFAS BAN ANGdO RELOCATIWI TOFO!MD Apr UTIOIgS- FdOCATEDISTRB!IIAT CONFLICT W/PROPOSED A RESULT W FAC03MON PROJECT O EJO•ANSION OF UNIVER.STTY FACE DS 19ro925G 3,461 SYSTEMB.iPROVEMEMS- ALL NSIOADR9 MORAN REPLACE Ap REPLAN98FEET98YBARE wFRAS1RUCTORE SIEEI.PWE WDH 9B FF£TOPT 19)10250 )42 SYSTEM It�ROVEMENTS- KOQF-ICPSWITH4FEETOF2"PL ALL NSTOMERS WAXAHACI� REPLACE 1),652 -PDE19)Iw4G SYSTFAIR^iPR0VEAIFNIS- ALLNSIOMERS SFB]tMAN REPLACEREPI.ANDETERFAM AAWREPLCE4 UNDERGROUNDFACLL 19)I111G 6,436 SYSTEM - ALL CUS'1'O[.HRS CL9C0 REPLACE IWROVEOFV REPLANE FEET OF 4' WRAPPED p9FRA.SIRI/CHRfE STEEL PSE WITH 100 FEET OF 2' Page 66 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 07 of 155 DES�ONPCOMPLE DATE PACED PROTECTS PLACED W GAS W Ogg U PRO3ELT IrtR3'IYPL WSERVICEOR CUSTOMERS I flA tm NUMBER COST RRT$EDDURWG3M3 BENEFTUD LOCATION PURPOSEOFPROJECT SERVICE 19711600 13,341 SYSTEM U.iPROVEM1$NIS- ALL CUSTOMERS CORSICANA REPLACE Ap REPLACEDETERIORATED UBRASTRUCNRE UNDERGROUND FAMMS 19711630 13,291 SYSTEM IMPROVAOTIS- ALL CUSTOBfETS COMICANA REPLACE Mry REPLACE DETERIORAT EPBRASTRUCTURE UNDERGROUND FACBPDFS 19]11]86 098 SYSTEM D-1PROVA93Tr3- A CUSTOMERS DEMSON REPLACE Apr REPLACE DETERIORATED OJFRASTRUCJURB UNDEROROUNDFACMIMS 19712M 7,190 SYSTEM OVEMENIS. ALL CUSTOMERS SHERMAN REPLACE MW REPLACE DETERIORATED WFRASTRUCHJRE UNDERGROUNDFACD.H$S 19]1313G 1,315 WSTALLATONOFPMEAND CObS$R DEMSON SYSTEM EXPANMON JW APPI$TENANCFS-WSTALL OUETOCUSTO DISTR$UDON FACdHiFS, WITN GROWN PARf1AI.REO$URS PFROM DESTDJD NSTORme 19714366 8,081 SYSTEM B.IPROVEMENTS- ALL CUEfOM1$RS ELMMOT[ REPLACE Apr REPLACE I00£EET OF 3' BARE 9U'MSTRUCTURE S1EF3. P605 FEEFOF 3' 19714616W9 INSTALLATIOMN NOFOF PPEAND RESmENDAL RINO-O. SYETOEXPANSION Jun APPURTENANC 30 N. DUETROVffH $R CPWEALL FEECOFTPLASIICPPE GROWTH 19]14636 4,431 s ALL CUSTOMERS BROWNWND REPLACE AW ACE99'ROV OF REPLAMTH9EF MON DJFRASTRUC[URE OF4'ST MAWS WITH87FEET0£1• 197I5TIO 3,960 COSTIN� ES- ALL CUSTOMERS LEAN COSTBWCUIUtIDW AQ OVALOFFAM REMOVALOF FACRITJES- REIB$1GFAC6ITRS ABANDON 160 FFETOF 3' BARE S'14Z P$E 19716010 13,233 RII.00ATONOFFARON ALLCUS3OMFRS LANCASTER RELOCATONTDAVOm Da REI.00ATSASTR NFW7 NWCTPROPOSID ULT FACRITIFSAS A RESUESULOF PROIECr STREET PROTECT 19718336 5,191 WSTALLATON OFPNST N RF3mENML HONEY GROVE JW AISMBUNANCFS-QiBSALL DUETOCUSTOSYSTENIEXPANSEON DUE TONST089:R DISTR$UDON FACEPT$S GROWTH 19718890 7,963 GTONOFFAC AL NSTOR AWGTON RMOAnONTOAVOM Oc REOAEDSTSON OICmomsw EACSASAREULTOF PROC EXPANSION OF UNIVERSDY FAC L T$4 19718936 10,190 WSTALLATONOF P@E AFD) CON04ERC1AL AB6Pt$ SYSTEM EXPANSION JW APPURTENDSER IM DILE TO NSTOb1F32 MElERS ANDSFRVICEL LIM GROWTH 19'118976 3,256 - BYSTAf Dft=0]7NTs- ALL NSTOhIDtS SANANGELO REPLACE Apr REPLACE 160FEETOFTBARE DIFRASTRUCNRE SPOE 16FEOF 3 191986 ;IW ST TNOFN NffW DA9 SYSINSN On APPUR S-UNSTL DUETOMSOM DISTIUDTONFACRS,WTH GROWTH PART1ALR FROM OCUSRSEBA$HT 51'WG CUSTOMER 19]19]16 834 SYSTEM - ALL CUSTOMERS SANANOELO REPLACE Apr UNDMOROUN REPLACMONOFQROUND WTMSON 19719836 ]1,469 RELOCATIONOFFACBON ALL NSTOMPRS CIDARPARK TO ARE R£JAGTONTO AVOm J. RA CONFLICTO PROPOSID FACO.iI FSULTOF SASAMMTN PROTECT STREET PRO= 19]19886 85,645 EON OF RAOGTON OFFACR.IT]A- ALL CUSTOMERS WAN RAOCATONTOAVOW Nov TSASUI$UDON CONFLICT FACM] FACLLITPRO 8ARF3ULT OF iPROPOSED PROTECT STREET PROJECT 19TLOO6G ]3,791 SYSIAI0.RROVEMENIS- ALL CUST0889iRR5 BRYAN REPLACE Aug REPLACE 660 FEET OF 3'STEEL JNFRASTRUCNRE Page 07 of 155 ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 68 of 165 DESCR ON OF COMPUTED mw PLAQL PRO.D'.C£S PLACED IN GAS pCAg UIRATY PROJECT 11TD.IFYPIANTw SERVICEOR NSF051ERS PL6NTw NU8D8ER NST RRI➢BEDDUBINGM BENEFITED LOCATION PURFOSEOFPROSECF m1 1980580 U1WB RELOCATIONOFFAC61TpS- ALL NSTOI CEDAR PARR RELOCATIONTOAVOD Nov RELOC MDI=BUOON CONFLICTWIPROPOSED FAC61TI "ARESULTOF PRO= SIREEPFROIECF 1980800 9,525 WSTALLATIONOFPUTAND CORAfERCLU. PARIS SY33IIdWANBION !d APPUIIT£NANCFS-wSTALL 135' DUETO CUSTOh1eR PLASTiCPIPEANDSTEELCASw6. GROWTH WITH PAROAL REPpURSEMFNP FROMRE UESTINOCUB omm 19]211]0 31.095 RELOCATIONOFFACD.TIIFS- ALLCUSIORIERS BURNEF RELOCATIONTOAVOD m"RELOCATEDISTR®VIION CONFIACP W/PROPOSED FACRPIIESASARESULTOF PROIP.CT STREEIPROIECf 19231580 4,1% INSTALLATIONOFPMEAND CObD. cR BURLEBON SYSTEM EXPANUON Bey "MmNANCE9-WSTALL DUETONSTOb1ER DIB UHONFAMME9,WITH GROWTH PARTW.REp03URSEADwTFROM UPSTDIG NSTOFIFR 1981600 86,631 RELOCATION OF FA�- ALLNSTOME FORTWORTH RELOGTONTOAVOD Sep RIDA MDISIR® N LUNFJaW/PROPOSED FACO.Rff ARESULTOF PROTECT STREEPPROME 198356G 8568 REI.00AHONOPFACUMS- ALL NSTONffRS RICHARDSON RELOCAHONTOAVOID Aug RELOCATEDIBTRIBUI30N CVmlL w/PROPOSED FACE.IHFSASARPSULTOF PROTEGE GOVERNMFNPAL 1981910 &888 IUMOCATEON ACDON ALL CUBTOIdFR3 DALLAS RELOCATIONTOAVOD Sep RELOGTEDL9TR®UIION CONFLIC[ W/PItOPoSED FAC ES AS ARESULT OF PROlEC[ NA DRADAGE OF 19214416 7,48 RELOC N FA CONO6F]tCLV. BURNEF RFLOlawl TOAVOD Apr MDMFFAUUONS- RELOGTE DISTR®U110N CONFLICF W/PIIOPoSED FAC6111F5 AS A RESULT OF PROTEGE CELO4 C LOPAfE6FS 192/5410 13,5'H RELOCATIONOFFACD.RiES- NOFFA ALL CIISTOEfFltS ATHENS RELOCATDNTOAVOD !d RF3ACATEDISIRIwTT10N CONFLICTWIPROPOSED FACB3TIF3ABARESULT PROTEGE GOVERNLmmo Us T 1988110 Sjb9 S - ALL CUSIOAR]t3 PUMAM REPLACE Ap PS U66PROVE F2"B REPLACE6] FEES OF 2'DARE wFRASlF[UCNRE STEEL P6E 6]FEES- 3' 1988130 4,056 RO A40FEE70F3'B- ALL NSIOMERS FIAwD REPLACE AW RBFLACE 149FEEF OF 3• BARE HMLA INFRASTRUCNRE STEELPIPE I4a FEEFOP 2' 1981430 6,3w SYS RO ALLNS'IONFRS WACO REPLACE Muy REPLACE i 12£1£1' 4' BARE Aal1ROV OF'I- DIFRASTRUCIURE OF STETS. PPE WRH 120 FEESOF 4• 1982456 1199 RELOCA ALLNSFOMERS RICHARDSON RIIOCATIONTOAVOD Aug DISN UBMO0i3- RELOCAIED13TRpUT1ON CONFLIR W/PROPOSED FACE.II(E9MARESUTOF PROpCF UEST GOVERNhION 1983860 35,981 R£LOCATSDIS ACD.ITD�S- OF ALL NSTOMERS FORT WORTH RFIOCATIONTOAVOD 1W RELOCATEDISTRBUBON CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FACR.11'RXKONSRE=ON PROJECT' STREET RECONSTRUCTION 1981100 3,83 SYBTFMD.BRS- ALL NSTO81ER5 STEPf04VR.LE REPLACE J. REPLACE240 F=EEPOF OFV4' RARE D4FMSlRUCNRE S1FT PBEWPIOFPFEET OF 4' 19]31330 (988) wSTALLATION OF CONA1ERCW, SPAGOVO.LE SYSTEMERPANSION Aug WSTA OUETROMMi O]t DISU VONCEB-w=. DISTRDVOON£ACB.RffS, WITH GROWTH REO.IDURSFI.SFROM UES'ONO NCUSTOMER 19734560 3,RIg wBTALLATION OFPWTA REBDENTIAL GREENVD,LE SYBTfMEXPANSION Msy APP NCE3-DLSTALL 135 D UETONSTOAfEIt FEET OF OF3' 3' PLASTIC P@E GROWTH Page 68 of 165 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIIASION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Pepe 69 of 155 D�HO710N OF LVWUMwrEeu® PROJPCIS PUCEDw GAS w GA5011VFY FR UIILIl'Y P1ANTw SERVICE oa NSTGMERS PIANFw NUAdBmwER cosi aETmeD DDRwc mm 9ENEniED wcAnoN euaPose oSeROFEcr souls 19)31630 11,606 STSIFIA0.@ROVET-4NIS- ALL NSTOLIDtS AeB.ENE REPLACE Ap REFUGE 132 FEETOF 4' BARE wFRASTRIICNRE P@E, FfEF CAST -1' F BIONAND2 FEET OF 3'PLASTIC MON P@E, AND 211FP OF OF P@E WRN 211 FEET OF J' FUSTIC 19n196G 3,617 DFSFALU" OF D NMMERCW. OgAyB1P11A� SYSTMCUSANSION IW WST5 APPORTENANCES-wSTALL DUEroNSTOL.BRR DISTRIDVIIONFACB.rt@S, Wlni GROWTH PARTIAL RElAOURSEMEMFROM RE UESTwGNFPM 19n5R0 3951 wSTALUTION OF PBEAND CO3efE1ICW. LANCASTPB SYSnMEAPANSION Sep 330 DUEro NS20)q-St FEE[ OF 3' PLASnCP@E WITH Fl=OFFNANCESC ME GROWTH PART W. REB.iBUR9Eb4NT FROM NST06® 19')360Hi 2,981 REL TIONMDl OFFACB.TIIFS- ALL NSTOMFAS SANANGELO RELOXTWIFOAVOBJ AP FELOCAIHDISTRB3UTION CONFLICT WIPROPOSED FACB.UIESASARES111.TOF PROJECF Cysro IIESI 19)JRW 9,068 STSTEMD,@ROVEMBNR- ALL CUSroMFRS SAN ANGELO REPLACE Apr REPUCE3F9 FBE201 4'BARE B8'RASIRUCIIINE STEEL P@E FEET OF <' 19T3)81O 4,107 ONOFP wSTALLAHON OP PIPE AND RE9wENnA1 COhB.BB10E SYSTFMID@ANSION Mey NCF3-wSTALL DUEro NSTOFII•R DISTRIBnW FACB.ITIES DMTMTO GRO WOI 19)35130 I],60 RELOCATION OF FA�- ALLNSroMERS FORT WORTXRELOCATIONTOFOO Oq RELOCATEDATR®UT10N NNFI.ICPPROPOSED FACB.IIIES ASARESULT OF PROTECT Nsron/Fx uBrr 197>983G IOj94 SYSTFlA D.@AOVEMENIS- ALL NSTOefERS MDRPNY wsl'ALUHON OR Au REPLACE DLITRICFPEGIA.ATQt REAACEMENTOF SFAIION MEASBREMOlk REcuunmoN 19n9gx 27 COSTwNRREDWFIBTIIE ALLCUSfoMEAS DALLAS corn 11RREDw AW REOWVAL OF FACRTIlES-REIIXE REI BtwO FAMITIZ )BFEEFOFY WRAPPIDSTEP3. 19)3995G 1,3R COSFwCURREDWRNTBE AL1. CIRTOMEIIS ABB.ENE COSTS B9NRRmw AV REMOVAL OF FAMOOES- REnRDIO FA� ABAFBJON215FEEFOF WRAPPED SnF2. P@E 1974055G Us RELOCAnONOFFACB.n@S- ALLNSIDAIFR9 BRYAN MOCATION TO AVOID LLy RELOCATEDIBTBIBV ION CONFLICFWIPROPOSED FACB.n1E.9ASARFSULTOF PROIECP 11 SERE MCONSTRUCOON 197MM 4j9 RELOCAOON OF FAW.ITIES- ALL NSroM TERRELL RELOUTIONTOAVOB3 gay REI.00ATEDISTRBIUnON CONFLICTWIPROPOSED FAL9. ASAMULTOF PROTEGE STORM P@E AND SE W ERpROTEGE 191105)0 3Jf6 SYSIFMB.@ROVEAffMS- ALL NSIM4R4 SAN ANG60 RFIIACE ELF REFUGE WFF]3TOFYBARE BM1'RASntUCI11RE STFF3. P@E WITH 1 W FEET OF 2' IM100 1.301 WSTA LOON OF P@E AND RE9BlENIIAL BROWNWOOD SYSTEM EXPANSION Mry APPURTENANCES-wSTALL 190 DUETO CUSTOMER FEFIOF3'PUSnCP@E, WFy11 GROWTH PAR RE0AB11RBEM1aT`I FROM RE UESTB9GNSFOA IW42490 2.451 RELOCAnON OF FAMOM- ALL CUSTOMERS DALLAS RFIOGHON TO AVOID Pec RELOCATE WUUBUnON NIffL11 WIPROPOSED FACLLIIBSASARF_911LTOF PROTEGE PA V w0 AND DRABIAGE FR03ELT 1952M 3.433 SYSTEM OVE61FlDS- ALLNSTDMERS TAYLOR REPLACE AV REPUCEDEFFAIORATED B9FRASTRUC)I1RE UNDERGROUND FACBJTI6S 19045190 9,304 SYSTEM PWROVEI.BMS- A cos DAIDIS DALLAS RFPI-ACE !m REPLACE 100FFET OF Y STEEL CJFMS1RUCf51RE P@E WITH 102 FEEF OF Y PLASnC Pepe 69 of 155 • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 70 of 155 DMCRHMONOFCOMPLETED W1E Cm PROJF.C15 PL CED IN GAS WGA9 V16rtY PROJECT DTO3'TYPLANTw SERVTCEOR CUUOMF.R4 PL w NOg®ER COST RETMED DU G 2 MNEF IDCATION PORPOSROFPROIECF 6ERVRS 19]45636 7,515 SYSTEM D. D'ROVQ.dNTS- ALL NSTOh BANDERA REPLACE Q1 REPLACE DwFR10 M wFRAS1RUCIURE UNDEROROUNDFAC = 19]45]90 660 NSTINCUI DWTIHTHE ALL CUSTOF WAN COsTswCIMREDw Apr REMOVAL OF FACdTTIFS-RETME RETMwG FAC� 520 FEETOF 2' PLASTICP 1974599G 21,900 RELOCAT)NOFFAMT11FS- ALL CUSIOAffRS LONOVMW RELOCATIONTOAVOID A, RELOCATE OMTRwU110N (ORECA COFDULT W/PROPOSER FACdI]]ESASARFSULTOF COUNTY) PROJECT NVERNhMNTAL 19746010 17,903 R OCAWDZT AUTON ALL NSIOMERS MVD4G RM.00ATONTOAVOID JW FELNATED6TRMU1ION NNFT3CT W/PROPOSED FACd1T1ES ASARFSULT OF PROJECT ALLEYIMPROVIMENIS 19]16030 11,05 AELOCATON OF FACdiTffS- ALL NSIOA4]ts LONG! RELOCATIONTOAVOID JW FA.00ATEDMTR®UUON (OREGG O NNPLI P09® FACdTI6SASA RESIIU. COUNTY) PROTECT MOZCT NENTAL UEsf 19716866 17,489 SST]WACIdMROVE65ENIS- ALL NSTOMERS DEFBSON REPLACE )Ay wFRA41RUCTURG UNDMEOUNDF MT IINDFRORONO FACd1TIF3 19)1]336 1,062 RELOCATION OF FACdITffS- ALLCUSTOMERS DEMOB RFLOCATONSOAVOID )My FELOCAT MU CONFLICTOMCT OSm FAC MA T PROlECf AGEPSARESULTOF DRAMAGE PROTECT 1974806G 47,2% SYSTEM BNPROVET+MNTS- ALL NSTONffRS DALLAS REPLACE Aug REPLACE 6 FEET OF B' CA TMON wFRASIRUCTUI E PME,12 FFBTOF 4' CAST IRON PPE,AND605FEETOFYCAST MONP W 6FEETOFT PLASTICPUT, I2FEET OF4- P UCP AND147FF£T01FV 19748160 293,555 SYS IWROVE6fEMS- ALL CUSTOM DALLAS REP m Ikc REPLACECMTMONMANSMTH wFR MUCTURE T.ASnc MADJs: REMOVE DISTRICTREOULATORSTAnON 19)48)50 68.223 SYSTIWB OVEA4slT3-INSERT ALLCUSTOh WAN RPFLACE Oct 2,450FEETOP2'MmT[cP wFRASTRUCIURE W UN10'ANDVCASTMON INSTALL REGULAroRs 1974MG 1.276 COS[wCURRED WITH]HE ALL CUSTOLg]tS RANGER COSTS INCUR IN ALy REMOVAL OF FACILTOM-RETIRE REIIRwGFACdITNS 251FEETOF2.8ARESh P ANDMTALL4FEETOF2' 1974N8G 16,689 SYSIFMIMPROYTMENTS- ALL NSIOMFAs A and REPLACE Sep REPLACE231FMTOFI'BARE wFRASTRUC UIW STEEL PIPE W2TN231 FEET OF4- 19]53640 10,789 RELOCATION OF FACU=- ALLNSTOAtERs CARROLLTON RMOCATONTOAVOM Aug RdOCATEDISTRMVOON CONFLICT WJ PROPOSED FACdTUFS AS A RESULT OF PROTECT NVID4L 191568)6 0,093 RELOCAT[ONOATIONOFFACdOTFS- ALL CUSTON¢lt$ SAN ANGELO REIDGTONTOAV A pr FELOCATEDISTRMUnON CONFLICTW/PROPOSEZD FAC A3DR PROTECT OITOF CONTRACTCTOR DAMAGDIG MA W 19759396 ],I]I SYSTEMw1PR0VH.1FwT5- ALL NSTONiFRS NRSICANA REFRACT Mry REPLACIORATED DD'RASTRUCCURE UND]MGROUNDROUNDFACd= 19]19436 3,995 S EMTIM ALL NSTO2AMS NRSICANA REPLACE May LACISDIR B.ER.15'TItUCTURE UNDM ROUNDIORATED UNDERGROUND FACd1T1E5 19]60310 55 60 RELOCAnONOFFAC iR - ALL CUSTONffRs DALLAS RELOCATION TO AVOID A, R OCATEDISTR®UTION CONFLICTW/PROPOS® FACdTFTESASARFSULTOF no= STREET MCONSTRUCITON Page 70 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DMSION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Pelle 71 of 155 DECRBTTON COMPLE DATEPIACFD PAOJECFE PIACED E4 GAS B GASDTDdiy PROJECT' UITd FY ITINSERVICEOR CUMA01US I PLANTB NUMBER COST RETBED DURIJG 3003 BENEFRLD I.fJCATTON PIJRPOSEOFPROJECi SER"m 197601N3 10,136 RELOCATIONOFFACd=- ALLCIJSTOMFRS BURNS£ RELOCATION TO AVOID May MO MDISIIUBUUON CONFLICFW/PROPOSED FACD.PIIFSASARESULTOF PROBCP STREEFRECONSTRUCOON I M11)G 319 INSTALLATION OF PR'S AND COMMEIM LE MLE SYSTEM ERP"mm TW APPURTENANCES-I15TALL DIJETONST DISTRBUITONFACUIT@S, WITH GROWTII PARTIAL RE0.BURSEMFM FROM RE TING GUSTO 19MI830 894 SYSTEM IMPROVFAfftT3- ALL CUSNMERS CLYDE REPLACE JW REPIACE 163 FEEFOF 3' BARD I IWTRU=RE STFPJ. PBE WFFII163 FEEFOF Y 19)6185(3 1].353 SYSTEMIMPROVEMENB- ALL CUSYOMERS ABB.ENE REPLACE Aug R�PLACE31)F TOF6"BARE I STRUCNRE SIFII. PIEAND30 FEET W 2 - BARE STFII. PBE W 34) FEET O£6'PLASTICPPEANO30FEET 19M 16 139,38] INSTALLATION OF PIPE AND ALLCUSTOMERS ENVBONS SYSIEMEAPANSION Oa APPURTENANCE -INSTALL DIIETONSTIX.tER DISTRB=ON£AM=. WFIH GROWTH PARTIAL REdBURSFEITIT FROM UE -TING NSIW 19/63006 2,080 SVSTFMR.IPROVEABtTB- ALLCUSTORBRS NLLEGE INSTALLATION OR J. RETLACEDISTRICPREGULATOR STATION REPLACESB TOF STATION MEASUREMENT OR REGIR.ATION 19]64026 14,156 SYSTEM]M]W MENyS- ALLCTISFOMFRS Mi QTAFAILS REPLACE Ds REPLACE450FEETW1.35'BARE INFRAS RUCIURE IW"24G 5107 SYSTEMIMPROVEABNTS- ALL CUSTOMERS FxISCO REPLACE Aug RFPIACE90FEEFOFPPLASTC I8'RASTRIJCNRE PIEWITH100F 0FVPLASTIC MEATF30`OSEOCRFPX 19]61306 Q44) INSTALLATIONOFFTEAND ALLCUSTOhffRS BECTON SYSTEMEEPANSION Ssp APPURTENANCE-I45TALL ]J0 DUETONST0A I=OFYPLASTTCME� W GROWFH REIBUR8EAIFM£FROM NSTObIR 19766836 50,914 Md nCNOFFACOJMES. ALL CUSPOMEE DALLAS MWATONMAV= JW RELOGTE DISIABIITON CONFUCF W/PROPOSED FACB.yHE9ASAREULTOF PROJECP NSTOFBR UEST 19/6)460 33,199 INSTALLATION OF N CIIAABRneI SANDER SYSTEMQJUOSION JW APPURTENANCE-I4pT 114u DUETROWTki ER OF FSITEMArtNS, WOHPARTW, GROW[H REFROM UETING NSTOLBR QUES GCl/ 1976/196 6,736 SYSTTMU.IPROVEAU2' ALLNSTQ\BRS FAIRF]ELD REPLACE J. REPLACEIUFEEF OF 3'BARE QiFRASTRUCNRE STP1PE WfIH I<5 FEE!OF 3' 19]68566 6953 SYSTEM E.IPROVEd1ENIS- ALL CfISTOhORLS WACO REPLACE Im REPLACE 100 FEEFOF Y WRAPPED IffRASTRUCNRE SIFT P�100FEE!OFT 19TM70 235 WSTALLATON ONOOF P@EAND COMMFRCL3L ARLINGTON MEEPANSION IW APPURTENANCRUBIJ4 DUE DUE TONSTOMFR WSTALLED DMTABJTIWTH GRO MW FACUI'[O FBCOA@ANY 19)14016 6,800 RFIOCATIOTION OFFACd1T1FS- ALLCfISTOF4R.S DALLAS RELOCATION tOAVOID Aug FFEDLSTRBVRON CONHJCP W/PROP03D FAMInI AEU]OF OOWJN/E DAGEPRT 19T5IIG 3,763 ROAnONOT- AL NSTOM BASAS APODSEIDD My RLOTEDISTIUBUTT PCROTO' COENOFl.ILPTTRI FACRITIEASARJESUTO PROTEGE SEWERPRO 19'1)6616 11157 SYSTF3.10,1PMROVEMENIS- ALL NSTOPRAS CORMCANA REPLACE Jm RFPLACEDBIHRIORA QiFMSIRUCNRE UNDERGROUND PACdTIIM IS Pelle 71 of 155 • 11 E ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 72 of 155 DE ON OF COWUT'ED DATEP"M PR03ECT5 PLACED W GAE w GAS UlD.1lY PROJECF ITT.TIYPL WSR WV OR CUSTOMERS PLAN'Tw NUMBER COST RETIRED DU G2003 ERNRFFPED LOCATON PURPO.SEOFPROJRCP 6ERVICE 191Ft 681 MTALLATONOFPIPE N COMMER FRIBCO SYSTEM EXPANSION Aug APPURTENANCES -INSTALL 110 DUETOCUSTOMBit FEEFOF 2" PLASTCPIPE, WITH GROWTH PARTIAL RED.0IJRSEMETT FROM REQUESTING CUSTOMER 19))1686 (37O wBTALLATIONOFPU'EAND COMA4ltCW. FLOWER SYSTIM EXPANSION On APPURTENANCES-MSTALL MOUND DUETOCUsmO DISTRIBUTONFACOPtQ;'S. WTIN GROWFN REDABIJRSQ.DNTFROM CUSTOMER 19778170 18,689 RFYOCATONOFFACB.IDES- ALL CIISFOS TERRELL RELOCATFONTOAVOD) 1® IMOCATEDISTR® ON CONFLICTWIPROPOSED FACRdTD3ASAMSULT0F PROJECT STREETRECONSTRUCIION 19m18G I4,i14 RMOCATONOFFACU.=- ALL CUSTOMERS BRYAN RELOCATON TOAVOm Aug RELOCATE DISTRB M CONFLCT W/PROPoSEO FACE. MIARESULTOFCRY PROJECT PROJECT 19]N]80 1,516 DLSTALLATON OF PUB AND COMMFR CUMBY SYSJEMEXPANSION SCP APPURIENANCTS-UBSTALL230 DUETOCUSTOMER FEETOF 2' PLASTCHPE W GROWTH PART W. REB.IBURSFADNT FROM RE UFSTMG CUSTOMER 19) 26 26,276 SYSTEM MPROVEMENTS- ALLCUSi0MER5 HVRO REPLACE JW REPLACEIOOFMTOF3'ST I �TRUCIURE 19)80026 5,762 SYSTEM DMOVEMffNFS- ALLCITST0M KIRRVILLE REPLACE Mm REPLACED MGROUND JNFRASTRUCNRE IWWIIG 7,941 SYSTEM D.ePROVEMIDTS- ALL CUSTOMERS BELTON REPLACE WY REPLACE200F OF4•BARE A'FRA5IRUCIURE STEEL PDB WRH 216 FEET OF 4• 19)R96G 753 DTSTALLATON OF PUB AND COMMERCIAL NUSCO SYSTFMEXPANSION Aug APPURTENANCES DUETROWT11 bffit DISTALLIDS-15FRE 0F2'OPFR GROWTH PLASTCPDBPORTf ECO COSiPANY 19)83996 853 RELOCAT I ALL CUSTOMERS DALLAS JW DUMACU.JTIFS- RELOGTEDISHlOUT0N CF CTONTOAVOID CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FACU.ITESASARESO W PROJECT DRfltSEC110N QVQ. 19)8455G ],369 FA - RELOCATONWFACU.ON ALL CUSTOMERS WACO RELOCATONTOAVOID JW RELOCAffi DISIR®UTON CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FACDPTffSA$AAESULT OF PROJECT 5'IREETRE N ON 19]8]30 11,768 OSTALATION OFTWE RmET WCTAFALLS SYEAION Ors UNE-MTLL355 DUiOOSOMER FF£f OF Y PLASTIC PM GW 19]g4]60 826 URREOWIFM- ALL NSTOSIERS OLNEY C0STS wCURREOw Mry REWV RFMOVALOFFACU.RDS-RETIXE REI'DtwGFACdIT1ES )S FEET OF 2• PLASTIC PUBAND wSTALL OVICELwE 19)86250 (1,8g8) wSTALLAnQH OFTON OFP@EAND COMMFRCW. QIJwI.AN SYSIEMEXP Aub Ot&R DUET MER DISMBENANCFS-DISTALL DIS'IR®UTON FA WITH GROWTH ROMTH FRRMS, RETMBUREEM14NiFR0M RE 1JESTNG NSTOMER 19'186]36 4,122 RELOCATIONOFFACB.OIFS- ALLCUSTOMERS PRISCO RFLOCATWI D An RELOCATE DISAMMTIAMTRIBMON ROPO CONFLiCt W/PROPOSm FUSTD IESAS ARESULi OF PRO/ECT CUSTOMER UEST 19]86936 99,2T RATIONOFFACD.IiU:S- ALL CUSI0SffR5 DALLAS REWCATONTOwVOID Aug RMOCELOCAlEDIBTRw CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FACE.IT@SASARESULT OF PROTECT AYSTEM IPROVEStEIRS 19)89980 9,6]2 SYSTEMPBRO - ALL CU5I0MIDI5 KERRVn1P REPLACE J. 01M 2' REPLACE100 FEETOF2•STFE1 DJFRASTRUC111RE PIPE AND IOEEE[ OF l" STFFL P0EWIlH105FEETOF2'PLA C POE AND IOFEET OF P PLASTIC Page 72 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 73 of 155 DE.4CRHMON OF COMPLETED DATE PLACED PROJECTSPLACEDWGAS WGASDNdTY PROJECT UTDlTYPLANTWSERVSCEOR CUSTOMRS PL w NUMBER COST RETDIED DU G 2 BENESMD LOCATION PURPOSEOFFRWECT SERVICE 19N0140 6,4n RELOCATION OF FA=ES- ALL CUSTOMERS ROWLEfT RELOCAT[ONTOAVM IW RELOCATEDIS3RBMON CONPLICTW/PROPOSED FACH.TIBS AS A RESULT OF PRO] EASE6BNT ISSUES 19790550 8,175 SYSFEMP ROVEAffNFS- ALL CUSTOWRS CORSICANA REPLACE Jug REPLACEDERFRIORATED WFRASIRUCIURE UNDERGROUND FACd= 19790630 5,781 SYSTF26P OVEMENTS- ALL CUSTgMW COEICANA REPLACE J. REPLACEDEItRIORAT£D WFRAS3RUCNRE UNDERGROUNDFACR.= 19MBIG 12,424 SYSTFDID.R'ROVEBIITS- ALL CUST0L1FR5 MADL90NVmIR REPLACE AUS REFLAMMSFEETOF2'STEEL WFRASTRUCTURE 19791066 4,574 WSTALLATION OF PJPE AND COMMERCUV, WOLFECIIY SYSTEM EXPANSION J. APPURThNA M-MTALL 100 DUETOCVSTOh FEEFOF2•PLASTICPUR GROWFN 19792160 8,110 RFIO nON OF FACD.ITIES- ALL CfISTON4R3 FRESCO RELOCAT[ONTDAVOM Aug RELOCATEDIS UFION CONFl W/PROPOSED FACDPTBSASAREULTOF PRO= STREET PRO]ECT IMM ll D7STALLATION OF PBEAND ALLCUSIOABR4 iFIdPLE SYSTFMEXPANSION Ott APPNRENANCE- WSTALL 6n DUETOCUSTOMER FEETOF2'PLASTICPIPE, WTTH GROWTH REPBURSQ.fE17TFR0M JRWUE5 oCUSTOMER 1979N60 5,474 WSTALLAT[ONOFPIPEAND REB3ENTW. BOGATA SYSTEM EXPANSION 1W APPURTENANCE -B ALL 65 DUETOCUSTO FEETOF2'PLASTICFB'EAND 100 GROWTH FEETOFOWPLASTICPTE 19J919N3 24,637 RELOCATION OF FACR.RIFS- ALLCUSTOM RICHARDSON RELOCATIONTOAVOID Sep RFIOCATEDI6TRBi7HON CONFLICPW/PROPOSED FACD,TEIEASAREULTOF FRO] ALLEYU.IPROVEMENTS 19795140 9,467 SYSTEM OVEMENTS- COMMECW. FREDERICESBU SYSIFMEXPANSION OW REPLACE2DIRUI.ATEDFLANGE3 RO DUETOCUSTOMER UNDER BRR3GE GROWTH 19795896 7,185 RMOCATION OF FACRIIIE- ALLCUSTOMES FARNID35 RELOCATIONTOAVOW UP RIDDCATEDISO ON BRANCH CONFLICFW/PROPOSED FAM]MESASARFSULTOF PROJECT GOVERNMENTAL u1 19/96580 18,060 SYSTEM DriPROVEMENT3- ALLCUSTOM1 ARC3DRCITV REPLACE J. REPLACE393FEETOF2-BARE INFRASTRUCTURE STPT-1. PIPE WMH 393 FEEFOF 2• 19796596 3,344 RMOA TION OF FACR.TNES- ALLCIISIOMEE FORT WORTH RELOCATIONTOAVOW lug REIOC MDISOtBUl30N CONFECTW/PROPOSED FACBITBSASARFRULTOF STRFxT PRO1F.C1' PROJECT 19796616 9,169 SYSTEMUBROVEMENTB ALt CUStOMERS WICHfiA FANS REPLACE J. RFPLACE210FH210 "BARE INFRASTINC[URE STEELPIPE 210 FEETOF 4' 197966ZG B,Zao S O ALt CUSTOMFAS WICIDTA FALLS REPLACE AS+Y AMUflAOVEOF&B REPLACEIOOFEEIOF6'BARE DhRASTRUC[URE STEELME100 FEEF OF 6• 1979N60 6P71 SYSTEM Th4ROVEM1fE1TTS- ALL CUSTOMETIS TEDSPLE REPLACE ]W REPLACEDETERIORATID WFRASTItUCIllRE UNDEGROUNDFACD.RBS 19799990 5,136 nTEODNISO'IFRFIABMON�- ACUSTOE BRYAN LATONTOAVOW Aug CONWCW/ROPOD RASAUTOF MEC BAREQUEST 19WIBSG $OM RELOCATIONOFFACILOMS- ALL CUSTOMERS SOUI}B.AEE REIACANONTOAV003 J® RELOCATE DISPRBMON CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FAMITIESASAREULTOFCITY PROTECT PROJECT 19802896 7,M WSTALLATEONOFPIFEAMJ RED3ENTW. DENTON SY�MON On APPURTENANCE- WSTALL DUE TOCUSTOE DISTRIBMONFAMIT6 GROWTH Page 73 of 155 • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 74 of 155 DESCR ONOFCOAU•UMD DATEPLACED PROJECISPLACEDWGAS WGASIRB.STY PROJECT UiBPTYPL IWSMWCEOR CUSTOMERS PL w NUMI@Jt COST RETIRED DURDIG ION BENEFTIED LOCATION PURPOSEOFPROJECT SERVICE 198058]6 "19 SYSTEM0. OVFA@NTS- ALL CUSTOMERS LAMPASAS REPLACE Cm REPLACEXFEETOF4'BARE U4FRASTRUCTURE STID.P@EW 102FESTOF4' 19805986 746 RELOCATIONOFFACU.U@S- ALL CUSttJF@RS ENVJRONS Rd T10NTOAVOM M" RELOCATE DISTRB MOON CONFLICT WI PROPOSED FACBATIFSASARESIB.TOF PROJECT IUGHWAY RECONSTRUCTION 19806320 31,3W RELOCATION OF FACBdTBB- ALL CUSTOMERS ARL04GTON RFLOCARONTOAVOID JW RELOCATEDISTRIBUTION CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FACU.ITIF MARFSULTOF PROJECT GOVFJ1N VEST 19806656 ],]04 nONO PSTALLATION OF RPSU)ENIIAL BEDFORD SYSITO U@ANSION Nw MSTA ENANCES-UISTAll DUE TOCUSTOSffR DISU DISTRUJUUONFACER@S GROWTH 198o6900 14,748 S ALL CUSTOMERS WACO REPLACE Sry REPLACE230F 3'BARE LACA@ROVEM1FrB D@RASIRUCNRE STEEL P@E WUN330 FEEI'OF 3" D0 1980'!326 5],340 RELOCATiOl=BU7OCN ALL CUSTOMERS MCIUNNEY RELOlaw/TOAV0U3 Aug RELOCATE DISTRB CONFLICTW/PROPOSFD ULT FACU.U@SASARESULTREOF P ROJECT GOVERNMENTAL UT 19g0]83(i 9,618 SYSTFMBIffROVEMENTs- ALL CUSTOMERS WACO REPLACE Dec BARE REPI.ACE221 FEET OF Y B WFMSTINCTURE SIID. P@E 325 FETiTOF 2' 1980]BBG 3P60 N OF RELOCAMDIS FAUMOWS- ALLCUSIOMERS TFRRELL R}lOCATION TOAVOE3 IW RETDCATED U CONFLICTWIPROPOSED A SULT OF FRADMCA PROTECT OESULT ORAD 19809230 10.6D tCHANGE SYSTEMN@ROVEOF4-B ALL CUSTOh@RS BFLLh@AD REPLACE Dec REPLACE 100 4" BARE DJFMSTRUCNRG 120E STEEL P@E WUH 120 FEEL OF 4" 19809]80 SSII RELOCAT[ONOFFACRM ALLCUSTOMERS ARL6J0TON RELOCATIONTOA J. FFCH=DLSTR®UTION w CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FACB.IT@3ASARESULTOF PROJECT GOVERM.@NVESTT 198103]6 (1,]55) A'STALLATIOOF NOFP PIPEA]JD COMMERCW. CLYDE SYSTEM EXPANSION Aug APPIIRTENANCE4-INSTALL 319 ➢TIE TONSTOEfER FEETU T N.ASTICPJPE WffFi GROWTH REUABRI GcNFFROM TING NSTOAffR 19810556 4.343 RELOCATIONOFF ALL CUSIONIDiS ROUND ROCK RELOCATIWIT Jug UDON5- TEDLSTRBUTION COID CONEL3CTWIPROPOSED FACT.. FACRR@SAS PROTECT GOVFRNSffNIAL REQLTOF 19810860 5,137 S ALL CUSTOM1@RS WICJUTA FALLS REPLACE Sep /'BARE UCEI@ROVEMEN'B REPLACE 100FFE UJFRASIRUCNRE SIFFt]. P62 WITH IODFPPl OF I' i00 19811606 21,574 SYSIACBZ5 VE ALL CUSTOMERS NILLSBORO REPLACE lm FVB REPLACE 335 FEET'35 BARE fNFRASIRUCIURE SfEEEI.. PIPE WON 335 FEEL OF 4' 19811836 158 RELOCATONOFFAIMONES- ALLNSTOMERS RICHARDSON REI.00ATIONTOAVOE3 Nw RELOCATEDISIR® CONFLICT W/PROPOSEO FACB,U@8 AS A RESULTUT OF PROJECT GOVEANAAENTALRE UEST 1981ZOIG 10,030 ST PROVEMENIS- ALLCUSTOMETLS WACO REPLACE JW REPLACE ACEI100FEEl'OF 4' BARE DiFMSIRUCIURE SLID. P@E WUH 120 FIBT OF 4• 19812/10 6,413 MA4ROVEMENI3- ALL CUSTOMEIJS GATESVnIF REPLACE Jm DJFRABTAUC[URE ETOF2' MEANFFOF OF2 P@EA NCPHMAND2=Wr C PBEWUH i M EEEI OF 3' Wnil 19812510 2,594 RFJACATIONOFFACJLI - ALL CUSTOMERS PALMFR RELOCATIONTOAVOU3 JW REIACATEDISTRBUIOCN CONFLICT W/PROPOSFD FACU.IT@SASARESIJLTOF PROJER EO@ MONOFWGHSCHOOL FAN.ITffS Page 74 of 155 • EAJ • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 75 of 155 ON OF COMPLETED DATE PW PRO.IECIS PLACED W GAS W GASULDd1Y PROJECL DTdRYPLANTWSERVICEOR CUSTOMERS PLAATw NU m COST REFIRED DN G 2 BENEFITED LOCATION PIJRPOSEOFPROJECT mmu 19812VG 3% INSTALLAUONOFPTEAFD COMIAERCW. AELE(PARKER SYSTESIEKPAN9ON S, APPURIINANCES-WSTALL COUNFY) DUETOCUSTOMER DIST UBUTTONFACU3TIFS, WNN GROWTH PARTIALREWIBURSEMENTFROM RE GCUSTOAIER 19813396 4,038 REL nONOFFACU.IT6B- ALLCUSTOMERS WICFJITAFALLS RFIOCATIONTOAVOH) Mry RELOCATEDISTRIBULION CONFLICFW/PROPOSED FACdFI@S AS A RESULT OF PROTECT OOVERNAfENFAL REOUTST 1981433G 4,626 RFIOCATION OF FACILI - ALLCUSTOMERS GEORGETOWN RFIOCATIONTOAVOM Jw RELOCATEDISTRIB=N CONFLICLW/PROFO= FACU.R65ASARFSULTOF PRO]F1.T GOVERM.fENTAL RBOMT 19814906 35 COSTUOU DMWHTHE ALL CIJSN81FA5 QUAFm COSTSWCURREDW JW REMOVALOFFACU.ITIFS- REITRWGFACU.ITIFS ABAFIDON 1&9 FEEFOF 2' BARE STEEL. PIPE 1961507G 1,276 RFLOCATIONOFFAC6RIEN- ALLCUST08085 ARLWGTON RELOCATIONTOAVOU) ON RELOCATE DI8TRU3UTJON CONFl.ICFW/PROPOSED FAMASARESULTOF PROJFTT GOVERNhtrNTAl 19818'100 1,381 RELOCATIONOFFACRITDB- ALLCIISTOMERS COMMERCE RELOC Um TOAVOM JW RELOCATEDIFOUBUIIOH CONFLICTWIPROPOSFD FACUATIFSASARFSULTOF PROJECT SH) WA KPR0IECF 19MI130 9,780 SYSTWH0[PROVEMENFS- ALL CUSTOMERS BRYAN REPLACE J. REPLACE280FEEFOF3•STEEL WRASTRU=E PTE V=280 FEETOF 3' PLASTIC 19821646 256 WSTALLATION OF PUCE ANO COMBfERCIAI ORF£NVU,LE SYSTPM EXPAN90N M APPURTENANCES -INSTALL DUETOCUSTOM1ffA DIST UDONFA�.WITH GROWTH PARTIAL REPIBUR9Fb4NF FROM REQUESONG CUSTO ffR 198DA1G 2,206 RELOCATION OF FA�S- ALL CUSTOMERS RELOCATIONTOAVOW Aug RELOCATEDIS UMON CONFLICF wl PROPOSED FACUST169ASAR6VITLTOF PROJECT DR OEPWEWSTALLATION 19824086 12,397 SYSTEM IMPROVFd1ET`IS- ALL CUSTOMERS BRYAN REPLACE Aug RFPLACE217FEETOFVSIFFJ. WPPASTRUCIURE 19824560 6,387 SYSTEM U4PROVF.6ffMF5- ALLCUSTOMERS SANANOELO REPLACE J. RE7'LACE350=0F2-BARE DU"MSTRUCIlRtE STEP]..PBEW 3%FEEFOFT 19824730 4,032 RELOCATION OF FACRITTES- COIA.ffKC MARBLEFALLS RELOCATTONTOAVOM Oct RELOCATEDISFRBMON COFff 1. WlPROPOSED FAW.ITTESASAMULTOF PROJECF COM CAL DE OPMENI 19U4750 6,3H CUSTOMERS BECTON REPLACEFLACE37FEEFOF3'BARE RD'RASTRUCNREEELPPEAND28FEEFOF4' ls��O�-ALL ASITCPPEWTTH60FEEFOFV ASTIC PM AND 41 FE15F OF 4' 1906%0 18,173 SYSTF MROVEMFMS- ALLCUSTOMERS SA24ANOELO REPLACE J. REPL MMDFEEFOFMBARE WFMSTRUCFURE STEELP AND49FEEFOFM WRAPPED STEEL PU•E WITH 360 19UMO 1,881 SYSTEMOdFROVEMENIS- AUCUSTON SANAF[OmO REPLACE JW REPLACE369 FF]:FOf 2• BARE WFRAS7RUCNRB STEEL ME WRH 369FEEFOF 2• 19UU10 1,110 RFLOCATIONOFFACLLFIlE4- ALL CUSTOMAS ROIJMJRO RFJOCATWNTOAV IW RELOCATE DJR UITON CoFffll IW/PROPOSED FACRITTESASAMULTOF PROJECT STORMDRAW WSTALLATION IMWO 130,065 RELOCATION OF FACU.iDE5- ALLCUSTOMPRS COMANCIff RELOCATION TO AVOID Ds RELOCATEDiSTRIBUMON CONFLICFW/PROPOSED FA�ASARE ULTOF PROJECF STREEFRECONSTRUCITON Page 75 of 155 • E • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Pape 76 of 155 D ON OF WWUnD DAYEPLAC® PROJECTS PULED IN GAS w GASDTBPTY PROJECT UTUPNP UVSMWCEOR NSTOMERS P Of NUABER COST RETDIEDDMNG20B BENeFITED IACATION PURPOSEOFPROJECT MRmm 198300]G 736 NsTALL nmoFPH'E C�C M=RY SYMTEMFXPANSION Oct APPURTENANCES -MTA DUEttJmmWR DU BMON FACERBS, WIIN moo PARTJAL REB.BURSE6IQ:TFROM REQUESTwG NSTO81FOt 1983TJ5G S,857 SYSTEM BItPROVETBNTS- ALLCIJSTOMERS LAEfPASA3 REPLACE wx REPLACEIIOFEETOF4'BARE B'IDRASIRUGTURE ST m. PBE WI OI113FEETOF4' 1993S25G 24,231 SYSIFM OVE6IDVT3- All CUSTOMERS DALLAS REPLACE JW IREPLA=DMMT REOULA BJFMSTRUCTURE 19839370 38,203 RELOCATION OF FACBJTIES- ALL NSTOMER.4 NMANCIB RELOCATION IO AVOM Dec RELOCAIEDISTRB ON NNMILTW/PROPOSED FACEITIESASARESIRTOF PROTECT SI REEL RECONSTRUCJION 1983950G 1,850 WSTALIATIONOFPWEAND CO2MBRCW. LONGVB:TV SYSTEMEJ@ANSION JW APPURTENANCES -INSTALL 329 (GREOO WETONSTOF FETTOF2'PIASTICPB'E CO GROWTH 19MIS20 4,N7 SYSTFMRWROVEMENTS- ALL NSTOMFRS STANFORD REPLACE J. REPLACES]FEETOFWBARE w STRUCNRE SLID. PB'E WTIN 55 FST OF W 19"1550 16321 SYSTEM D.>PROVEMENIS- ALL NSTOMEAS ABE.EFIE REPLACE Oct RFPLACE431FEETOF3'BARE wFRASTRUCJURE STEE11.PIPEW 431FEETOFY 19N166G 1,885 SYSIEMI8IPROVEMFMS- ALL NSTOMERS ITA mI REPLACE JW REPLACE220FEETOF2-BARE INPRASIRUCIURE SIFFJ. PIPE WITN220FEET OF 2' 19"4110 9945 RELOCATION OF FACTLTJIPS- ALLNSTOMERS NPPERAS NVE RELOCATIWTOAV Aug RELOCATEDISTRBIITION CONFIICLW/PROPOSED FACBATO: ARESN.TOF PROBCT DRABAGEPROJECT 19mnG (165) MTA ATIONOFPPEMID COIR.BRCIAL PRwCETON SYSTEMF "SION Oa APPIBTFNANCES- WSTALL 3,520 DIBTONSIOABR FEET0F3'MMTICME, WTT1l GROWFN REPIHUILSES4NLFROM UFST[MOFSIOMER 1981/330 1],829 RELOCATIDNOEFACEIIBS- ALL CUSTOMERS FRISN RELO[A Aug FELOCATEDI3TRB WJTOA M NNPLICTW/PROPOSEO MT FACB.ITIFS AS A RESULTOf PROJECT PAVwG PROTECT 19"50](3 25,68] SYSTEM HKAMCABStJS- ALL"STONERS FOREST FBI REPLACE Jd REPWNPLASI wFRASONMA E mO 19NT/8G SJ83 RELOC FAP ALL CUSTOMERS GATESVIlI.E RELOCAIWlmo JW MDOFFACOON FFGACATE DiSTR1BIJITON = CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FACB.ITIFSA3ARE9ULT OF PROJECT ORAL OIECT 19"7860 JJ6 RELOCATION OF FACB.fIffS- UON ALL "STONERS WAN RIR.00ATIONTOAVOID JW RELOCATEDISTRBIITION CONFLICTWJPROPOSED FAW.ITffS ASARESULT OF PROJECT "STOMIA VEST 19"9080 16,0]9 RELOGTION OFFACB.UIIB- ALL CUSTOEDRS SANANGEIA RFIWATIONTOAVOW Aug RELOCATE DLSTRIBiJTION CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FACB.I MAREUTOF PROJECT MGNWAY RECONSTRUCTION 1985050 289,410 WSTALLAnWUPME ALL NSTOMFBIS ROUND ROCK FORTDTCATIONOR Dec APPURTENANCES-wSTALL 1,800 SYSTEM B.IPROVEEBBTT FELT OF 6' PLASJIC PDE;T�w TO 6'BPLASTICPB'E; VEGETATIONREMOVAL AND ENV 198511W",409 nONTALSTUDYAND RELOCATION OF FACO.IllE.S- ALL NSTO81FR.4 NMANCFB RdOCOAV0H3 Da RELOCATEwBIRBUIION CONFLICT IawWlPROPOSm FAN.T[ff ARESULTOF PROJECT IBOTI W AY RECONSTRUCTION 1985]330 403 NSTPC:VRRED WRH TIB ALL "STONERS FORT WORTH COSTS wCURREDw JW REMOVALOFFACH3TBS- RFIBH4OFACB.TTffS REMOVEDISTR®UCION Pape 76 of 155 C J ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING Page 77 of 155 DESCRIFFION OF COMPUTED DATE P1ACFD PRO3RCT5 PLACED IN GAS BGASUOD PROIPCF UTII3TYP3 WSERVICEOR CUSTOMERS FLAXEN' NUMBER COS! REFBED DIIBUiG 2003 BENEFnTD LOCATION FURPOSEOFPROJECF SERVICE 19153220 15,58) RELOCATTONOFFACB.RTFS- ALL CTISFOMERS TAYLOR RELO MONTOAVOW Aug PMOGTEDISMBMION CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FACU.JSPS AS ARESULT OF PROJECF BRBGE REPLACF3.PM 19653M 40,10 RELOCATIONOFFAM. S- ALL NS Ob COMANME RELOCATIONTOAVOM Dec RELOCATE DISTRBIJTION CONFLTCFW/PROPOSED FACIL F SASARFSULTOF PROBCF IUGN WAY RECONSTRUCTION 198f361G 13,695 BSTAMATION OF PPE AND REBmENT1AL COR SYSTEMB ANSION Aug APPURTENANCES-BJSFALL DUETOCUSFOMER DISTRBU)IONFACdIT1ES, W GROWTH PARTUV.RE0.BURSEME TFROM CUS OA 19153]50 113,741 RXIOCATION OF ALL CUSTOMERS DESOFO RELOCA Sep nDISMBA m RFIOCATEDTSTRBUTION W/FOAVOID CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FACUlSBS AS ARESULT OF PROJECT ALLEY RECONS TRUCIION 19856306 1,068 WSTALLATION OF PPE AND ALL CUSTOMERS RB.LEEN BYS )W APPURTENANCES DUETOWSTOKER EOFOACPfVSAM2]0 GROWS PSOFPLASTCPH-E.W PART W. REdBURRELiFNF FROM RE CUSTOMER 198566/6 7.169 RELMOCAUMATIUNOFFACRIIPS- ALL NSTOMERS CADDOMdLS RELOCATION TO AVOm JW RECO CONFLICFW/PROPOSED ESDISTRBUTION AS PROBC[ STRU ON BRIDGERELU COON BRIMEF 1985]500 I,In RESmENIUJ. ROYSE C[IY SYSTIMCEPANSI Aug APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER R DUE TOCUSTOMSR �MTALLAM�OFPIPEAM ED3USFELTOF 3' GRO WTH PLASnC PLASTIC PPE, SERV ICE L W E, AtN RISF]iFOR THE COMPANY 1985878G 16,834 SYSTEM ALL CUSTOMERS ABdFfB REPLACE Aug MPEFTOF3.5- AEPLACE300FEET OE 3'BARE NPRASTRUClURE STEELPPE WFIH300 3' 19860596 1949 mOF TIB ALL CUSTOMERS WACO COSTS DOCIIRREDN' Jm REMOV LOFFACILFI REMOVAL OF FACdCf1E5-p4T19i REMGOG FACdrtBS 133FEEFOF4'CASFBONP6E 19861830 13 59 SYSTEM NPROVEMEMS- All NSTOA ABdENE REPLACE Ou REPLACEMFEETOF4'BARE I6IFMSIRUCFURE STEEL.PPEW 471FEEFOFP 19862ND 8,539 RELOCATmNOFFACI=SS- ALL CUSTOMERS DALLAS RELOCATTONTOAVOM JW RELOCATEDL4TRBVTION CONFLICTWIPROPOSED FACH=ASARPSULTOF PROJECT STREETRWONSTRUCTION 19863106 358 COSTOICURREDWFFFFTRE ALLCUSIOABR9 ABMEPB CoSISDiCURRFDB 1W REMOVAL OF FACdF11ES-RETBE RET3RR0GFACdITBB lMFEEFOF6'WRAPPEDSTEEL PPEANDMFEETOF6'ANDCAST OmNPPE 19865956 303 SYBTENIFPROVEMEMS- ALLCUSTOMERS LJTFLERNEIt REPLACE JW REPLACE II FEET OF 3'BARE ACADEMY WFRASTRUCII/RE STEEL PPE WITH 11 FEEL OF 3' 198J3310 14151 SYSFEMECIFEETIAFYB ALL CUSTOMEI25 SANANGELO REPLACE A9g REPLACE 411 TBARE DVFRASIRUCNRE 411 STFH. P=SeO 411 FEET OF 3' 19835m 3,631 COSTDJLOFFAWITH TIB ALL CUSTOMERS FIdLSBORO COSTS BYCAC=E Aug REMOVAL OF FACdiFPS-RETDtE RETRBGFACdRBS 4a F4' BARE STIIR.FPE AN0O 130 FEETOF 3' PLASTIC PPB IN 19874366 5,J53 SYSTEM ALL CIISEDMFRS BALCH SPRDVGS REPLACE J. lWF=MENTS- REPLACE FOF2'PLASTIC JRE mFRASKV 1987I530 8,993 ONOF RELOCATEONOFFACR.ON ALL CUSTOAIDL9 WACO TO RELOCATWIPOAVOm Aug RP].00ATE SFR CONFLICT W/PROPOSm ESUT FACdITIFS AS ARE9ULT OF A PAOhCT RELOCATIONTO CONFLICT WRHSTORMDRADBAGE REFINiION POND Page 77 of 155 • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 78 of 155 DESCR ON OF COWISUV NATEPIACRD PR05 MPLACEDIN GAS pCASDTdOV PROSECT UTRPTYPL Fw MoWECEOR CUSTOMERS PLSNTp NUMBER COSI RE'RRSDDU GJWD BENEFITED LOCATION FURPOSe OFPlDMCT MERV 19874RO 52 COSTINCURRFDWITHTHE ALL CUSTOMERS ROCKDALE COSTS pCURRFD DJ Ad REMOVALOFFACI=I- REfIRDJOFACMF11E5 REMOVE DISTRTBUUON 198754601 7,969 RELOCATION OF FAC1=1- ALL CUSTOMERS BUFFALO RELOCATIONTOAVOW JW RELOCAiEDVSTR®UIION CONFLICTWIPROPOSED FACD.FIIESASARESULTOF PROJECT HIGHWAYRECONSTRUCDON 19Y/563G 7,073 RP2.00ATTONOFFACIL=- ALLCUSTOOFRS IIRREI.L REIACAT[MTOAVM Aug RF2ACATEDISTRJBUTION CONFLICTWIPROPOSED FACH=SASARFSULTOF PROJECT CUSTOMER UESF 19878000 1394 ALLAMON OF PIPE AND COMMERCIAL WACO SYSTEM EXPANSION 3d URTINANCFS- WTALL 450 DUETOCUSTOMER L OF 2 -PLASTIC ME, WFITI iuw GROWTH T W. RED.pUR3Elff hT FROM oCUSTOMERS 195784401 10.2m SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS- ALLCUSTOMFIL4 MCKO0IEY REPLACE An REPLACEDEfER10RATED DURISFRUCI'URE UNDERGROUNDFAM IF.S 19SJ546G 10,454 SYSTEMNPROVEMENTS- ALLCUSTOM1IPR4 MCKINNEY REPLACE Aug REPLACEDEIERIORATED INFRA5IRUCRJRE UNDERGROUND FACILt 195828M 20'm WSTALLATIONOFPMAND ALLCUSTOO FORT WORTH FORMICATION OR Dec APPUATFNANCES-pS 5,p] SYSTEM B,PROVEMEN'F FEELOF6-PLASMCPPE 19882580 10,TR SYSTEM OVFMENTS- ALLCUSTOMFRS MLSBORO REPLACE Sep REPLACEI30F TBARE D4FRASTRUCNRE S'14]. PIPE I W FEET OF 3' 103 19885PoG 1;010 R N OF ALL CUSTOMERS HRYAN RFIOCAJIONTOAWM An OCAM DIVOFACD.ITB:4- RBLOCATEDISAMMTN CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FACB111PSASARFSULi OF PROJECT SEWERPROIELT 19885010 9,040 SYSTEM DPROVI3.PN1'S- ALL CUSTOMERS ROIXDALE REPLACE Od REPLACE 375FFET OF 3' SI[1S. DFRASTRUCNRE PIPE WDH375 FESTOF 3' PLASTIC 1988)560 81,836 SYSTQd DrIPRD ALLCUST000t5 DALLAS REPLACE Oct DOMM4- IPRASfRUCNRE WDISR ROUWDFACIL UNOALIATINOFPIPITIPS 19885/36 SZIJ ATION OF RESmENTW. W50T0 SYSTTOCU NSION fW MnE [. APPURTENANCES-pSTALL APPM DUE'TOOUSTOMER DISTR®UTIONFACB,IDFS GROWTH 1988H10 3,iLD SYSTFAFJOPROVEMENTS- ALL CUSTOMERS FO.LSBORO REPLACE An RFPLACE100 pFRA$RBUC[URE 106FPBARE STEEL. PIPE FI Ip FEET OF T 1919888600 12,8)3 ROACATIOHONOFFACO.ITIES- ALL CUSTOOfERS COLLEGE RELOCATTONTOAVOm A ug RELOCATED6TR®UTTON TAnON STATION CONFLIPROWF POSED FACILRFS AS A RESCTION PROTECT SDBEETnONOFIRUCDON 198857101 2,231 RELOCATIONOFFACD.DTFS- ALL CUSTOFPAS CALDWELL RELOCATTON TOAVOm J. Tf OLSD8DUT10N CONFLICTWIPROPoSID FACT AS IACD PROTECT CONSULTCF SIURM SE WER CONSTRUCITON S 1988F/50 3j31 S ALL CUSTOMERS PALESTINE REPLACE IW LAM ,I'CA IRDN REPLA SF IXON MADS DPRASIRUCTfIRE WTCH 218FEFROFA PLASTIC PIPE 19 FIMF 1989366E 3],889 R60CAT[OITOFFACR.ITIBS- ALL CUSTOSIF]tS FAIXFO.D JW IEpSTR®UTION COL ICTIONTOAVOm CONFLICTO PROPOS® FACM FACdi PROTECT' UASARESULON STREETRECONSTRUCDON 19M199G 7,038 RF].O TEON OF FACH. AL NST04 NO WUONTOAVOID AB tMDISRBUTION CONFlICTW/RPOD FACD,ITIFSASARE.9ULi OF PROTECT CUSTOMER 1989/620 7.738 REJ.00AT10NOFF ALL CUSTOMERS MESQURE RELOCATION TOAVOD Aug TOONS- TIASAMULTN CONFl.ICTWIPROPOSED FACI.DTHSASA OF FACII PROJECT UCTE STRF'N RECONSTRUCTION Page 78 of 155 CI • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 79 of 155 DESCRPRON OFKPUM DAT 1"M PROJECTS P4 UD W GAS B GA3 VIBLI'Y PROFECT UTR2T FP TBSERVICEOR NSTOMERS PE4NI D4 NII3BER Con RETBED DURING JOR3 RENEFTIT.D LOCATION PURPOSEOFPROBCT 3E mm 1989 4R SYSTFMIMPROVQ.IQNTS- ALLNSTOFID95 LITMER REPLACE JW REPLACEI3£EET0FYBARE ACADEMY INFRASI4UCNRE STEEL PEE WFIH 13 FEETOF 2' 19894880 4,116 MSTALLAT[ONOFPB'EAND RF9BENIW. COLLEYVLLE SYSTEeT ERPANWON I# APPURTENANCES-D18TALL 60 DUETOCUSFOh1ER FEEFO£2-PLASTLCPD'E GROWIR 1989681G 4,186 DISTALLATIONOFPB'EAND RESmENTLLL CLARRSVLU SYSIEME%PANSION Nov APPURTENANCES-INSTALLW DUETOCUSTOND2l FEETOF Y PLASIICPBE, WRH GROWTH PAR REI.BUR9D.1Q4CFROM REOI/ESTRNG CUSTOMER 19893066 11,396 RELOCATION OF FACdR1E8- ALLCUSTOM BIJRLESON REIAGRONTOAVOI) Sep RELOCATEDETRBUTION CONFLIa W/PROPOSED FAC6RBSASARFSIILTOF PROJECT CUSTOMERQUEST 19893526 13,520 EMR OVEMENIS- ALLCILSTOMFRS CORSICANA REPLACE Oct REPLACE DETERIOIUM EEROROUNDFACdI IVFAASIRUCIIIRE S 19398676 37,621 R ATIONOFFAMMS- ALLCIBTW.ffiNS FORTWORTH RQ-OCATIONTOAVOB @ RELOCATE DB'IRIBUTION CON JaW/PROPOSID FACdRBSASARE}TJLTOF PROJECT STREETRFADNMUCIION 19898696 35,333 RELOCATION OF FACJLRIES- ALL CUSTOgORS FORTWORTH RELOCAIIONTOAVOID Da RELOCATE DISTRBUIION COFDI.ICTW/PROPOSED FACdTJ "ARFSIJLTOF PROJECT SIREETRENNSTRUCLJON 1989986G 10275 SYSTEM OVEBENTS- ALL CUSTObBRS RE WLLE REPLACE Aug REPLACEFEET OF4" WRAPPID NTRASTRUCNRE SLID. PBE WTFEET OF 4' PLASTC PO'E TOUO REPAE LFAKMG 19901000 12E SYS]FMIAPROVFMEMS- ALLNSSOhBRS ABR.EDE REPLACE Aub REPLACE335 PFE4"BARE INFRAS]INCTURE S= PIPE WRR 33S FEET OF 4' 335 1990IOIG 6,981 EYSTFM O.iPROVEMENE- ALL CUSIOSER.S ABdENE REPLACE Aub REPLACE 153 FEET 53F4' BARE DIFRASIRUCNRE SIEE 153FEETO£4' 1990/026 11229 IMPRO SY3TEMdiPIFV ALL NSIOhffRS AB6ENE REPLACE Sry OFNIS- REPLACE211FEETOF6'BARE DI'RASTRUCRBE $Iffi.P OF I' 19901586 11,6F! WANO146FEET SYSTFMI=FEUOF4'S ALL CUSTOMERS COLLEGE REPLACE Sep REPLACEZOOFEEC OF TATON MUN PBE20EOFCPLATC 1916 28,326 OCATIC-- ALNSOM D RGOD On MOCAMDMMBUON COWCwimomSID FACdRESAS AR PROTECT umox£ STREEFRECONS'LRUCRON 199®936 3,401 RELOCA]IONOF ALL CUSIObffI(S COLLEGE RFLOCATLONTOAV !W BA ONS- RELOCATE DISTRESULT STATION CONFLiCTW/PROPOSED ES AS A RESULT OF PROJECT STREET RECONSTRUCDON STE= 1990.303E 3,425 SYBRMLMPROVEMFNTS- ALL CUSTOAERS ROGERS REPLACE JW REPLACE 103 FFJJI OF 4" BARE IDD"MSTRUCTURE SiEE. PEE AND 4]FEET OF 4' CAST BON PBE WITH ISO FEEIO£ 19905100 14.035 SYST£MAIPROVEMENIB- ALL CIISTOg1FJL4 MART REPLACE lW REPLACE100 FEE120 4'BARE IJFMSIRULIlIRE ST(TREEX WRHIto FEEF OF 4' 19906016 1,559 WSTA OF PBEAND RESIDEVRAL I.DD)SAY BYS]£MEXPA Aug IWT LL 157 WR DIEIO CUSTOMER FM OFENANCES CPWE, PEETOF 2'PLASRCPBE, W[M GROWd{ PARTW.RE0.BlIIQ-3 FROM RE IJFSTDNG CUSTOMER 1990]486 27,208 SYSTEM D.a'ROVEABMS- ALL CUSTOMEIB DALLAS REPLACE IW CE 388 FEET OF 3" WRAPPID DBRASTRUCNRE SIEd PBE WRH 396 FEED OF T Page 79 of 155 • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 80 of 155 E ONOFNIFIPLETED DATEPIACED PROJECTS PLACED IN GAS w GAS U56FIY PROSECT UFRIiYPLARTw3ERVICEOR COSTOMERS PLANT NU6IBER COST RFTBIED DURING 5003 RENF.FITF.D LOCATION PURPOSEOFPROIECF SERVICE 199093)G 934 00hP1ERCW, KERRVmec SYSTEMS ANRON Aug APPURTEW M-INSTALL50 DUETOCUST081ER �INSTALLAMONOFPWEAND FEETOF135-PLAS cpm WOH GROWTH PARTIAL RED.®URSPSPwT FROM RE UES3INO CUSTIX.1Rt 19910120 3,046 RELIX-ADON OF FACDJTIFS- ALL NSTOM1PSc9 ROUND ROCK RELOCATIONTOAVOm IW RFIOGTEDISTRIBVIION NNFMCT WIFROPOSED FACOJT MARBSULTOP PROTECT SDIEET RECONSTRUCTION 19911036 195,885 R m`DNOFFACdI - ALL CUST0MER5 DALLAS RELOCATIONTOAVM N. RELOGiED15iH®V[10N CONE =W/PROPOSED FACD.IT MAMMTOF PROJECT STRFbT RENNSTRUCOON 1WI1350 6,614 OVEMENIg- ALLNSTOMERS STEPHFNV0IF REPLACE 1W ACEDBTERIORATED EEAOROUND DIFMSTRUCNRE FACML 19913556 751 SYST IIOROVE6fEM5- ALLCUSTOMERS SANANGELO REPLACE !W REPLACE 90FEET OF P BARE wFRASTRUCHIRE STJ}L PPE WITH 90F10TTOF r 19914110 kin INSTAL nONOFPPEAND RESmENML @VINO SYSTEMS ANSIM IW APPURTFNANCE9-w3TALL DUETOCUSi0NID0 D15TR BU MFACLLI GROWDI 19914520 n.129 SYSTFMD.PROVE6®T ALL CUSTO3A]LS DALLAS REPLACE Aug RFPLACE1039FEEF01`4'CAST D3FRASTRUCTURE MONPPE WAFT 1051 FEETOF 4' 1WI4556 103,n6 MO nWOFFACH.ITTES- ALLCUS]'OMERS ARLINGIDN RELOCAnON AVOM Da RE3DCATEDISTR BU M NNFLICTwlmo OSED FACO.RIFSASARESULTOE PROTEGE HON SIREEFRENOF 1991/630 740 RELOCATIONOFFBC FA ALL CUSTOM14FS ROBINSON VOm !m 0145- RELOCATEDISIR®UDON WNIFL WimT NNFLICT W/PROPOSED FACE,iTffS AS ARESULTOF PROTECT STREETRENNSTRUCTION 19915)90 ;HB RLLOCATEDIS FACDJRPS- ALL CUSIOA4]L4 CAMERON RELOCATIONTOAVOm IW RELOCATSA STR® CONFLICF W/ PROPoSED ULT FAC61TUC0N RE4VLCN PROTECT SMEET RECONSIRUCRON 19916186 2,186 RELOCATION O£FACBJTffi- ALL CUSTOMERS PARIS Aug RELOCA COWLICTIONTOAVOm CONFLICT W/PROPOSED ASTR03Ui1ON FAC0.1'T033 AS ARESULT OMAN PROTECT HOLE RFPLACETIDTT 19916590 11D5 SYSTEMwPRO ALL CUSTOLIERS WICHITA FALLS REPLACE IW CF2-1g- REPLACE34FEETUF3'BARE wFRA3TRUCNRE STEELPIPE FEET- 2• 19916986 15,365 ROV I ,OF2-B ALL CUSTOMERS OiINTER REPLACE Sep REMACD305O Z"BARE REPLACE 305E DPRASTRUCfURE 305 FEET OF 3• STEEL PPE NS 1991)!80 4,536 SY 0 ALLWSSO8PR5 0AI£9VDlE REPLACE An LACEIWFE7f OFV E100 FEET OF 3•BAR6 RVFRASTRUCNRE S'IFFJO. PPE WITH 133 FF£IOF 3• UEEL 19910510 131N SYSTEM wPRO ALL CUSTOMERS PARIS REPLACE Aug 01`413- RFFLACE3S1FEEf OF4 INFRASTRUCTURE SPEPL PIPE AND 406 FEBT OF OF 3" BARESTEE WH 199MTH1 8,148 'FEEL S O FMENTB ALL NSTOMFRS DFMSON REPLACE Sep LAC!i245 REPLACE245£FEIOF 3'BARE wFRASTiNCIURE STER. PPE WGH 3t5 FEET OF 3' 19921906 20949 R© ALL CUSTOMERS RICNARDSON RELOCATIONTOAVOm Sep TE DIOFFAC6THBR- REMMESDISTR®UTION NNFMCT WIPROPOSED FACD.IT@9 ASARFSI PROIECf DN ALLEY RECONSPINCTION RFLOCATHINOFFACO.III64- 19933760 16,583 ALLNSTOMF)tS IUCHARDSON Sep BMOO RELOCATBOL4AMULTN CONFLIAn6NTOAVOm CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FACBdTPS ASARUS PROTECT 011E ALLEY RECONSTRUCTION Page 80 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 81 of 155 L'RRnON OFC MlE PWC® PHOJECISPWCFD W GAS IN 6A5UIWiY PROJECT UFRPFYPLA OR NS[OMEBS PLANTA NUMBER COST DT NGVICE BETIREDDURWG20Ri BENEM'IED IUGIMON PURPOSEOP PROIECF SVN. 19936)86 1,9)0 WSTALWTION OF T CONAP]iCIAL PFLUGPItVD.1.E STSTEMFXPANSION Nm INST APPURTENANCES-WSTALL DSIETDNSTOMER DISTRIBUnONFACLLI GR00.TH PARTLU. REP.i FRMOO M UESIWO NSTOMMNSTOMER 199ZR9G 23,625 REIACAnONOFFACB.HiFS- ALL CIISTOMEAS MCHARDSON REN. Sep RELOCATEWSIR®UTION NNFWCf W/PROPOSED MTONTOPOMD FACLLRff9 ASARESMTOFPROSECT ALLEY RENNSTRUCTIONON I993N3G 3,133 SYSTEM D.ffAOVF2..OF2'S- ALL CISSTOMERS GREENVB.LE REPWN AW REPLAN 121 OF 2' BARE R 19928HG 3934 N OF INSTALWAN OF Ad CUSTOhIDtS NEGHTS SYSTEMEKPANSION YS EXPMMO Oct NPE L APPURTENANCES- PI 405 IO]OHi3 DUE TONSTObffR AN FEES OF 4' PLASTIC PPEAND 70 GROPTH =OF PLASTIC PPE, NTnl 0.MFAp Mff 1996 29,65 R"ONOFFAC L NSff �O�rONMAVOM Nm RdOAMDISTR®VIION MNKHCW/ROO FAsTU AT CREEK NOSSIN6 PROJECT 19932ND 3,13 SYSTFMAPROVEMENIS- ALL NSIY3MFRS MCGREOOA REPLAN AW REPWNE FFF156 BARE BJFRASI'RUC[URE STFII. PIPE 56 FEEF OP 3' 19935300 6,620 nlON OFF RELO CO6AR]ICW. CEDARPARK NTOVOID AW MDIOFFACB.TIPS- RAMC COMM WIPR NNFLICT`HSPROPOSED ASTRD3URON FACRRPS AS A RESULT OF PROJECT COhR.fflenet DEVELO 19936060 436 SYSTEML3PROVFOF2' - ALL NSTOAfEltS ABD.ENE REPWN Sep RFPLAN36SFEETOFTBARE WFRASTRUCIURE STEEL. PIPE WITH 368 FEEF OFY 19936WG W2 [y�EPLAN49FFETOF2'BARET PPEAND35FEEFOF4'ARESTPPLPPEWITH49FEETOF "PLASMPPEAM335=OFV 19939056 60.295 RELOCAnON OF FACD.nIES- ALL NSI'OMEItS TEMPLE RFL MONTOAVOM AW RELOCATEDIS ISD ON COM�LICTW/PROPOSED FACRSTPS AS A RESULT OF PROPLT STRESS RECONSWUMON 19N0616 54,113 SYSTEM APROVFDm4T3- Ad NSTONIERS SAN ANGdO PEPIAN Nov REFFPWSnC INFRASWUCNRE PND,, 362 362 FEET OF 0FV 4" PLASnC PIPE. AND 302 FEET OF 6" PLASnC PPE WOH302FEET OPb-PLASTIC AND )80 FEEF OF 3' PLASTIC PPEM 19940626 501 SYSTEM B.PROVEMENTS- ALL NSlOh4]t6 ABB.ENE REPLACE SW R MON WFRASIRUCNRE MTH6F=Of`'CASI PPEN FEEPOF4"PWSTIC 19941856 17,607 I I ALL NSTOAPAS DENTON FOf"ROONOR Nov FORTIFICATION OFSYSTEM W nONOFSYS SYSTEId APROVVE6£.PNT JSY�FORWI OBWD HEIGHTS SECTION DEN OF DENSON OF 1994L130 6,051 SYSTEMR.4=OF2OS- ALL NSTQ`,PR.4 LLANO REPLAN AW REPLAN]0 FEEF OP 2" PPE D9FPASIRUCTURE ETOf r POE OF3'PEE MC TND5IIFEELOF3"P PRT WfH )4 MCP AND 5 FPET OF 2' PW411C PPE 199/1206 4.452 sysTm DPROVEASENIS- ALL CUSTOMERS PALESiD1E REPWN An REPUN10F 2"SFEd H9FRASTRUCNRE PPE WITH 100WEEET OOF 2'PWSnC 19993936 321 SYSIPMS OVE6fEM'S- ALL CUSTOMERS WSTLAMI REPLACE AW ABANDON 190 FFETOF P BARE WFRASIRUCNRE STEd PPEAND200=OF2" PLASnC PPE Page 81 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 82 of 155 DFSCRD'I ION OF COMPLETED PATE PLAC[D PROJECTS PWCFDPI GAS O� GA9 NLLOY PROJECT UllI2TYP SERVICE 0R NS[O86RS PLAWCE NUAIDER COSJ DD AAMON DITRDiG 5003 BENBAJTED IRLW N PITR PROJECT SERVICE 19915)10 6,411 - RELOCATISD0 ALL NSTOMERS ARLINGTON TOF RELOCATONTOAVOO) An 0=014 RELOGTEDISTR®UTION CONFLICT W/PROPOS® FA PROJECT ANO:SASARFi SDT EXPANSION OF UNNERSITY FACGI'ItE3 19915g7G 245 N WTIHTIff ALL CUSTOMERS IOWAPARK C0STS INCLADU JW VALIW FA REMOVEDTS FACO.TTIES- RETOtIN6 FACOJTPS REMOVE DISTR®UTION 19947100 85,891 SYSTFMO.iPROVEMEMB RLI. NST0MER9 AHO.EIiE REPLACE Nov REPLACE)AS D4'RASZRUCIURE 31OPt FEE STEEL PPE ATID 31 EBARE T OF 2" 19948570 166 SYSTEMPPR ALL CIISTOA4RS FORT WORTH REPLACE 1W R DE[E ORATES- INFRASTRUCOOtE FACMFD UNDERGRAfRO CO.JOFS MGI 19950060 4& SY ALL CUST0W]i5 ENVOtONS REPWCE JW LACE 2PR0 OF2-5- REPLACEMOFFJSTOF2'BARE OJFRASIRIICTIIRE STEEL.. PPE W1TH260 FEEIOF 2' 19950346 8.076 SY ALL CUSTOMERS ROWFNA REPLA® An AOE3PR0VEWV REPLACE324 OPRASIAIICiURE 324P4"BARE STFI-1 PPE WITH 321 FEEF OF 4' 1995076G 483 SYSIEMO.PROVE ALL CUSTOMERS OLNEY REPLACE Sep 2-B- REPLACEfl FEETOFI'BARE INFRASTRI1Cl'URE PIPEAND)O 125' DARE SPPE WTTH 143 143 FEET BASELID. 19950)80 476 SYS)EMPOVS- ALNSM PCTDPMSIRUCN IW WCDEORATED DFRASTRUCE UOUFACMP 199516 6 SYSTEMP N- ALL NSTMERS FWTWORTH RWCE JW EACDEORATED RE UERGROFAC 1995219( 7.1 SYS)ASPPROV s- ALL NSTOSIERS BALLINGER REPLACE Sep REFLACE300 FEET OF OF3'3•HARE OPRASIRUCOTRE STEL PPEWRH 300 FEET OF J• 19952386 J;449 5- RELOCATEDIS ALLCUSTOMEIL9 TfltRFLL RIIACATIONTOAVOm An RELOCATE UDCN CONFMCTW/PROPOSED ASTR®URON FACO.ITPS AS A RESULT OF PROTECT SmEWAI$PR 19956130 20,899 FA RELOCATTOISTSJB O.DN ALL NSCONPRS DALLAS RELOCATIONTOAVOM 00. RELOCATEDISTR®ITOON 0!oM CONFLICTW/PROPOSFD FACO.RIE4ASARDIAGE F PROTECT PAVINGMC DRAINAGEPROJECT 1995)530 3,686 REL0CAT1WI0RlBUD0N ALL NSTOAtERS BRYAN RELOCA AVOMMSW Aug RELOCATE WIP NNFWCT WI PROPOSED FACD.ITPS AS ARI'SULT OF AS PROTECT SEWERPAOIECT 1995761O 1,688 ABSTALWTION OF PO'EANO RFSINEN'1'IAL ENVOt0N5 SYSTEMIiXPANSION Dec APPUR)ENANCFADLUMS, DUE TONSTOMER WITIL lmo�G GROWTH PARVAUOONFACLLOIFS, PARTW. RE0.IDlIRSFdffNT FROM CUSTOMER 19951)]6 RELOC nWOFFACO.ITIFS- ALLNSTDF CARROLLTON RELOCATIONTOAVOM Sry RELOCATE DIST UDON CONFLICTWIFROPOSED FAMd SSASARFSULTOF PROTRCT STREET RECONSTRUCTION 19959596 SYSTEIAD.PROVHTffNTS- ALL CUSTOh COLLEGE REPLACE SSP HFPLACE450F OF3"SLEO. STATION OGRASTRUCTURE 1595wT f8,4476 RELOCATION OF FACODTES- ALL CUSTOS TAYLOR RE TIONTOAVOO) AubRFLOCATEDIRIRSBUHON CONFl.ICFW/PROPOSED FAC6DIE9 AS A RESULT OF PROTECTSTORM SEWER PROTECT19959806SYSTE WROVEMENTS- ALL CUSFOM1ORR COLLEGE REPLACEREPWCE 180 FLET OF 4'BARE STATION DPRASTRUCTURE 199601WSYSTEM PPROVP�MS- ALLCUST0S1FR9 ABH.ETIE REPLACE Aug R ACE35FFETOFPBARE R4FRASTRUCTURE STEEL PPE WON 35 FEETOF4" Page 82 of 155 • C J ATMOS ENERGY CORP„ MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 83 of 155 DFSCRPCION OF COMLETED DATEPLACRD PROJECIBPLACED W GAS W 6.55 UD1JTY PAOJEL-1' I IJ=VPLANPWSERVICEOR CUSF MER5 PLANiW NUAWER COS. 20W SMFRED LOCATION PURPOSE OF PROJECT SERVICE 19960196 5,219 WSTA ATIONOFP@EAND COFO.PR ARLWGTON SYSTEM EIPANSION Nov APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUETOCUSTOA4R WSTALLEDDISTRBiUiION GROWFN FAMIFFES FOR' COMPANY ISIW)27G 1,926 SYSTEM OVE6fEN13- ALLCUSmM SAN"O6 REPLACE Aug REPLACY26F OF2'BARE W4RASFRUC STEEL. P@EAND 13 FELTOF 3" BAREST PB'EWTtlm ZTOF 2' PLASTIC P@E AND 13 FF]T OF 3' 199625/6 19,455 RELOCATION OF FACO.RPJi- ALL CUSTOMERS LACYLA RELOGTIONTOAVOID Sep ROACATEDISTR®VnON CONFLICT W/PROPoSED FAOD.RPS AS ARFSULTnP PROTECT STORM DRAW WS.Al1.AT10N 19962606 13,511 REL nONOFFACO..f@S- ALL CUSTOMERS BURNS. RElACAT10NroAVOm Aug RELOCATEDISTR®MON CONFLICIw/PROPoSFD FACR.I]ESASARESULTOF PROTEC. STRF£FR NSTRUCIION 19%3250 10,W6 SYSTEM D.iPROVEhffNTS- ALL CUSTOMERS GRANGER RF (M Dee RELOCATE�SEDGASMAW W WFRASTRUCNRE CREEEBED 199632%1 8].935 SYSTEM IMPRGVFJ.fENFS- ALL CUSroMER3 GARLAND FORTIFI ATIONOR IXc REPLACE 16' PLUG VALVEAND SYSIkM1A@ROVEA4NP PURCHASE 16- STOP m 19963350 29,522 RELOCATIONOFFACD..IIFS- ALL CUSTOMERS PARLS RELOCATION TO AV Sep RELOCATEDMTIUlI=0N CONFLICF W/PROPOSED FACDJTIESASARES TOF PROJECT STREEF RFJ9NSTRUCDON 19963/10 2,171 IUMA TIO14OFFACBJTIE9- ALL NSTOMERS JOSHUA RFJACATION TO AV Aug RELOCATEDTSTRIBUTION CONFLIC W/PROPOSED FACOJ.PSASARESULTOF PROTEC. ORIT U 19969986 5,129 T[(ROIECT WSiA[JATION OF RE$lDINML WA%ANACFUE SYSTEMERPAN3[0N Aug NSTA 1, APP ANCFSCI'ME L]l DUE TOOUSTOAffR FEE.OFTPLA3TICP@E OF2E GROWRi 19%5556 2,91] SYSTEM D@ROVFMEMS- ALL CUSTOMERS Tz..e._c REPLACE Aug RFPLACE32FFJ:IOF3"BARE D6FRASIRUCIURE 2' STEd P@BKOF 19966]/0 6,931 AFEEFOF RELOC ALL CUSTOMERS LANCASTER RELOCATIONMOPO D Sep WDVFTlUEIMOI4 RIIOCATEnIS1IUBVOON CONFW PROPoSm FACD.IT@S AS A RESULT OF MWI PROJECT WSUFFICPN'. GROUNDCOVER 199]0916 8,763 SYSTEM A@ROVEAPNTS- ALL NSTOLPAS SFAPLE REWACE Aug EDETERIORATED HRASRllC DICDGROUNDFAC 1997386 71,W OOFFAFT(M3- ANP WSVILLE OOAVOm Ds RELOCMDISIRBUT[ON CN=W/FlOPOSD FAFumrIi 4AS ARFSIILTOF PROIEC. SIREE.RBCONSTRUCTION 199]3836 193 RELOC PFA(SLRPS- ALL NSTOM1PRS WACO RELOCATIONTOAVOID Aug TSD/ CONFI.ImW/PROPOStD FACIJIATEDIS.RTB UT PROJECT D AVASARESULTOF DRIVEWAY CONSIRUCIION 19971216 I,SM WSTAWTION OFPWSAND RESmENIIAt GREENVO.I.E SYSTQABRPANSION Aug APFIJRTENANCES-WS.ALL 100 DUE R FEEOO PPE FCV'TF[ GRMTB 199]1296 ]355 TIOLASRC RELOCATION OP PACDJDES- ALL NSTOMFRS BRYAN RELOCATION TOAVOm Aug REIACAT!3A!IA IDUTION CONFLIPILO PROFOS® FACD.Rff.S ASARFSULT OF PROJECT SIREE.REONSTRUCOON 19974656 5,516 WSFALLATION OF P@EAND RESmENIIAL CEDARPARK SYSTEMEXPANSTON On APPIIRTFNANCFF-WS.ALL 125 DUEGFD FEE.OF E' PLASTIC PPS WDH GROWTFIWIN PARTIAL RE1AW URffi.4M FROM c c6sroMER 199N9RJ 13n COSOVAL ALL CUSTOMERS WACO GOST$WCURREDW Aug OFFAWL1 - RFM FA REORDJG FACBITlE4 1112 01`2'- ABANDON 123 FFJ:T OF 2' Stffi. Page 83 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 84 of 155 DES ON OF COMPLETED DATEF" m PROID.CSSPL MGRS WGASDm.I1Y PAOJECf UTD.nYFL WSERWI OE CUMIKERS P w NIIIABER COST RETIRED DURMG 1661 BENEFITED IPJCATION PUBFOSEOFPROJECT MVICE 19916NRJ 43,M SYSTFihi R0VEME75- ALL CUSTOMERS ALLEN REPLACE Aug REPLACE486FEET OF V FARE DWIW RUCNRE STFIlPDEWTTH48o FEETOFV ASTICPDEANDMFEE!0F3' 19976986 4.432 SYSTEM MDROVFMENTS- ALI.M T ffRS GBOROETOWN REPLACE Nov RIIOCATEERPOSEDGAS MAMM MFRASTRUCTURE CREIX BED 199]8696 461 WSTALLA DEAND RESD)EN'ML SYSTEMERPANSION Aug Clm- AFPURT2'ftASnCFMLL165 mGlI !l HEIGHTS DIIETO NSTOMER PElTOF 2'PLASTIC PIPE. WITH GROWTH PAR'ML REOBllR5FS4M FROM uB3T3NG cFFACZI 19918'IG 11,938 RFLC ALL CUSTOMERS TERREII ItE[.00ATIONmomm) CO Tl3DlSFFACDPTIES- RELOCATE STRBUTION CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FACD.TIIESAS TOF A PRUIECT STREET RECONSTRMUCTUCTION 199801W 949 RELOCATION OF FACDPTBS- ALL NSTOMERS EARLY Aug TEDISiR®UTIT CELIcTONTOAVOD2 WNf1.ICT W/PROPOSED FACdIIDBASARESULTOF FACIL PROJECT DRARUOEPROJER 19986610 4458 S FMENTS- ALL CUSTOMERS STFPIBNVD.LE REPLACE Sep REPLACELACIEI50 IS6FEEI OF T BARE INFRA$'IRUC[URE SMLPDEW 15DFEET01`2' 1"mm 2,666 RELCCATICNOFFACM=- ALL NSTOMERS COLLEGE RELOCATION TO AVOID Aug RELOCATE DISTR1BMCN STATION CONFLILTW/PROPOSED FACDPTI MARE9ULTOF PROJECT STREETRECCNSTRUCRON 199R29G 5,171 RELOCATION OF FACH=- ALL NSTOMFRS DUNCANVD.LE RELOCATIONTOAWM An RETACATEDISMIHWICN CONFLICT W/PROPOS® FACDITIFSASARESULTOP PROIEC[ DRADIAGEPROJECT 1998337G 4.258 WSTALLATIONOFPJPEAIID MSDE FREDERICRSSU SYSTEM AIMON Aug APPURTENANCES-MSTALL 162 RG DUETOCUSTOMPR FEET OF 2• PLASTIC PDE, W GROWTH PARTW.REQ.BURSPMFN mw REOMMIG NSTC. IW9250 (6T2) INSTALLATIONOFPMEAND COMRBRCLV. ROUND ROCS SYSFFAf EXPANSION Sep APPURTIMANCES-MSTALL DUEHINSTONBR DISTR BMONFACLLRJES, WHN GROWTH FARTIAL REDBURSFABM' FROM UEATMG CUSTOI.ffR 19988]864,8M RELCCATIONOFFACII=i- ALL CUSTOMERS GRANDVBV/ RELOGTION TOAVOID Aug RELOCATE Dl!lMBlJTION CONFLICT W/PRoP FAC61TMl ASARESULTOF PROJECT STREETRECONSTRUCITON 19996630 9998 SYSTEM ll"ROVEMENTS- ALL CUSTOMERS DEMON FORTJFICATIONOR Nov REPLACE MAM ON AUDRA LANE SYSTEMDVJPROVEI+ffIII�D' 19996]90 1j77 SYSTEM ODROVFJ.>EMS-RETBE ALL NSTObDRS DENTON FORTIFICATIONOR Nw REGULATORONAUDRAL 11,1 SYSTEM ROVEMENT DENTON 1999151G 5,414 MSTALLATIONCFPDEAND COEMOTCW. BRYAN BYSTEM EXPANSION Ott APPURTENANCES-OISTALL 466 DUETONS20MFR FEETOF V PLASTIC PDE• WITH GROWTH PART W. RED..iBURSEM1ffilT FROM UESTMG CUSTOMER 1MW70 [611 RELOCATICNCFFACDTTBS- ALL NSTOEBRS ALLEN RELOCATION TOAVOD Sep RET.00ATEDISIR®V110N CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FACD.TTD'S AS A pPSULT OF PROJECT STREETRM)m UCTJON 19993&6 16,W SYSTEM OVFD¢NIB- ALLNSTOLBRS PARIS REPLACE Aub MFRASBUCIVRE =LFIJ296FEETOP4'BARE SIEAPDEION 366FEETOP 4' 19991896 2.985 MSTALLAHONOF PDEAND RESIDEN'ML SULPHGS ION Sep APPURTENANCES- MSTALL 166 SPRMGS DMTOCIJS DUETONSTOEBR FEEL OF T PLASTIC PDE GROWTH Page 84 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 85 of 155 DFSCRB'll N OF COWUnD DATE PLACED PROJE PLAND W GAS MCAS UfD,1JY PIIOPECT UTPPiYPL TMSERVICEOR CUSTOMERS PLANTM NURSER COSF RCTIAED DUBDVG 30M BENEFITED LOCATION PURPO.SEOFPROJECT SflIAICE 19995366 1.349 ASTALLATIONOFPMEAND NM OAL IPARNE SYSTEM EXPANSION Sep APPURTENANCES-BJSERT275 DUETOCUSTO FFbTOF2"PLASTICPPE1. 0 GROWTH MSTMG 4' STEEL PPF,REQMWTIH PARTIAL REDBIIRSEMENT F RQA TMG A 19926 6,117 OTOFFAM]S- IIOTONTOAVOID Aug RmOTEDIS=BUTEON CCWIm FACURASASULTOF PROTECT GOVERNAffF]fALRE UFST 19997156 HjH3 SYSTFMIMPROVEMENTS- ALL NSTORffRS SAHANG60 REPLACE Oct g'BARE REPLAPWEA 1NFRASTRllCII1RE STEEL.PPEAND4TJFF£IOF6' 4" BARE SIID.PPE EET 1999/306 9,2MRELOCATIONOFFACB.RES- AMITMS ALL CUSTOMERS DUNCANVLLLE RELOCATWIPOFOSM Sep RELOCATEDISA ULT CONFWCTOJ]ECT OSED FACU.1'I RESULT OF PROTECT AYASA DRNEWAYCONSTRUCBON 1999T690 7T2 RELOCATION OF FAC6UIES- ALL NSTOAIDtS FORT WORTH RIIOCAIIONTOAVO Sep FELOCATEDLSTR®UIION CONFLICTSED FACU.RPS A9 AitESULTOP PROJECT C6ISTOMER UEST 1999I91G 6,831 SYSTEM U.PROF2-'S- ALL CUSTORU:RS PAtJ3TPE REPLACE Ob REPLACE 100=FEST OF 2' 311 TNFRASTRUCNRE PPE WTIH 100 FFEI OF 2' PLASTIC S 1999]9]0 7,969 SYSTFMU.NTS- ALL CUSTOMERS PALESIUIE REPLACE ab REPLACE IMO2 FEHI =OFOF T SLID. DIFRASIAUCNRE PPE WITH IH FEET OF 2" PLASTIC }BOOHOO 17,949 RELOCATIONOFFBUTIOItE4- ALL NSTOM]AS GREENVUJJi RELOCATIONTROPOM Aug RFLOCATSASA URGN CONFLICT'WI PROPo�D FACU.ITMS AS AR PROTECT TIONF STSTE 20003830 5,655 A IONOFPDIlONSIDN OFPPEAND RE9mENT1AL BRYAN SYSTTOEfP Det ONALLATION APPURT2'MASS-MSTALL 300 OMEIL pUETOCUSIOMER FEETOf 2' PLARTIC PPE GROWTH 20WM9G 3,745 SYB ALL ClI3TOMERS MARLM REPLACE Sep AE IOIROVERIENTS- REPLACE101 FEETOF 3"BARE MFRASTRUCIVRE Sys PPEWI'fl{105 FEET OF 3' 3000ITIG 16,62] SYSTEM A30 MFVB ALL CUSTOMERS MARLM REPLACE Sep Fll 4"BARE REPLACE130FEET U9FRASIRUCTIIRE 35 SYS PPEWRH 135 FEEIOF4" 20W3g5G 5,(166 SYSTFMU.P=O]FNTS- ALL CUSTOMERS ROSS REPLACE O4 REPLACEIH INFRASTRUCRIRE 10$F2'BARE STEEL. PPE WITFI105 FEET OF 2' 20W389G 13,236 SYSTEM EN'S- ALL CUSTOMERS ROSS RFPI.ACE Ow REPLACEIWFEEIOFYBARE ACEIWFISTT INFRASIRUC[URE STF}3. PPEPRO 115 FEET OF T 20001000 Jj4] SYSIEMU.U'ROVEOiNTM ALL NStt1FIDt3 VA(BOSQU I.LS REPLACE Dec B REPLACE165FEETOFYBARE (BOSOUE DIFRAS']RUC[URE STEELPDEPRO FEST OF 2' N 10006336 14,259 SYSTETA0.IPROV ALL CUSTOMERS WACO REPLACE Oct OF3-13 REPLACEIg)PBARE INFRASTIUICIVIIE ppl10 STEEL PPE WITH 190 FEETOF3' 10W6730 1,618 COSTMCURRFDWTIH ALL CUSTOSfFR.9 TESPLE COSTS MCURREDM Avg - RFM OFOOM FACU,ITPS- REIMDiG FACU.RPS DV� ABAtd)ON R FEEL OF 3' RARE STEEL PPE 200H350 ]P SYSTEM D.PROVEMINIS- ALL NSTORMRS STEPIPSIVLLLE REPLACE Aug REPLACE 165 FEED 2' BARE BJFR,35TRIKTTIRE S PPEWTIH165FEEI01`2' 100093]0 5,705 RFJ.00ATIONOFFACU.RPS- ALL NSTOAfERS TFAPLE RELOCATIONTOAVOM Sep RELOCATEDIS=HWEON NNfLICT WIPROPOSED FAC SASARESULTOF PROIEC[ STREET RECONS]RUCITON 2W09000 Igy96 RFLOCATIONOFFACU.IIPS- ALL CIISTORIIB.4 gAANSFP].D RELOCATIONTOAVOM Nov RIUACATEDISTR®VIION CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FACUlTPSASARPSULTOF PROJECT STRFbT F=ONSIRUCOON Page 85 of 155 • r L CJ ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MIO-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 86 Gf 155 ON OF COMPLETED DATGPLSCED PROJECTS PGCEDDI GAS W GMUID.ITY PROJECT DTRPIYPIAN WMRVICEOR NSTOMER.9 PLM w NUMBER COST RETIREDDURDJG3003 BENEFiIED LOCATION PURPOSEOFPROJECT SPBVIN 2000 m 7,996 WSTALLATION OF PEKE MID RIMID L DALLAS SYSIFAIEXPANSION An MPURTENANM. MSTML 100 DUETO NSTO FEET OF Y PLASTIC wg GROw MOM 13,310 RFL T90NOFFACO.TIDS- ALL CUSf0NIDL5 CARROUL RELOC MMTOAVOW Sep RFIOCATEDI59TUBVITON CONE lawl PROPoSED FACBJTIFSASARESULTOF PROTECT GOVERNMENTAL UEST 20011196 9,231 RFLOC ALL NSTOMERS PLANO RELO TOAVOID Sep MDOFIBIMMES- RELOCAIEDLSTR®UITON Iawl CONFLICC WI PROPOSED FACdI'fIFSASARESULTOF PROTECT' T SIAUIHORJR'£ACBJTY EXPANSION 20013836 1,851 DVSTALLAIION OFPBEANO RESOJEMLU. GREENVII.LE MEXPANSION Sep APpURTENANCES-TNSTML2NSTOMER DY DUETO30 FEET OF P PLASTICPIPEANDI GROWTH FEEFOF T PLASTIC PUE 3001a48G 9TI SYSTEM B.IPROVEMEMS- ALL CUSTOMERS ABH.EFIE REPLACE Aug REPLACE SOFEETN 2' BARE 1NFRASIRUCNRE STEF]. PB'E WRI3 SOFPETOF- 3001861G B,)IB RELOCATIONOFFAS - ALLCUSTOMERS DENTON RELOCA Oq FELOCP.TEDISTR®UTTON W/m pmw CONFLICT W/PROPOSm FACUJTTFS ASARRSULi OF PRORBCT EASEMEIR ISSUES 20027I8G 5.930 SYSPEMAMS- ALL NSTOMERS MOODY REPLAN Sep REPLAN 182 FEEL 92=OFOFTBARE EVFRASIRUCIURE STFIIPTIONOFFA FEETOP2' 2W3t53G 6,133 RELOCATTONOFPA�- ALL NSTOMERS KERRVBIE RELOCATJONTOAVOB3 Sep RELOCATED151RB3UIION CONFI.ICf w/PROPoSFD FACRTIGSASARESULT OF PROTECT DRAINAGEPROJECT 2W2'MSG 5,991 SYSFFOVEMENTS- ALLCUSIOMERS HdL300R0 REPLAN Nw REPLAN M207 20]FEET OF 2'BARE DIFRASTRUCNRE Sy PB'EWITH325 FEET OF 3' 2W2TJ60 ]j09 SYSIFMD1PROVEMEMB ALL CUSTOMERS ROUND ROIX REPLAN Aug RFPL 3' OffRASWTOARE 30031086 9,874 - TIO OFFA 4- RO.00ATTONOFF ALL NSIOMFAS LAFOASAS RELOCARONTOAV00 Oq TEDf8TR® VDON CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FAMD UT FACRR PROIEC[ ONSRUCDONF STRFEAUMOSIItUCHON 30o3159G 3$55 RELOCATIONOPFACB.IDES- ML NSiOMFR$ ATf@FIS IONTOAVOB3 Sep RELOCATEDIBTR®UTRJN coI l CONFLICT W/PROPoSED FACB.I PROTECT ISSARESIRiN EASPA�NT ISSUES 20032120 1,953 S ALL NSTOMERS SANMIGELO RE10.AN Aub AMD.IPR OF2'S- RE%.AN90FFEJOPYBARE DlFIUSTRUCNRE STEELP WITH911FEET OF 3' 30033316 1,)45 ION OF PR'EANO COMMERCW. MARLOJ SYSITMEXPANBION N. NCE9-D15TALL 335 DUETONSTOMER PLASTICPB'E WTIH MG GROWTH O.�URSEMEM FROM CUSTO6ffR 200J130 351 COSTVa FAWI'IF ALL NSTOEORS ABB.ENE COSTS LNCIIRREDDV Aug RFA4OMOFOPFACB.111F5- AEIIRBJG FACU.1'1'DS ABANDON 378 FEEF OF a^CAST MON PDE 30036676 4,131 DJSTALLATION OF PIPA RFSmENTW. ORFFSRN,LE SYSIIMEXPAN510N Aa8 APPUR]ENANCES-DJSTML 165 DUE iONSTOMFR TOF Y PLASTIC PB'E GRO WTH 30036860 )9.1]9 BiTALLATIONNP@EAND WS awenuun GEORGETOWN SYM MEXPMIMON Ds APPURTENANCES -DEVELOPER DUEiONSTOMFR Ba3TALLFDDI3TRB3l GRO WTH MW FACdDTES FOR THE COMPANY 301137)80 1,3H RELOCAM ALL CUSTOMERS CALDWEW. RELOCATION TOAVOm Sep DIMIBMONB9- RELOCATEDISTRIDUTION CONFLICTWIPROPOSED FACE.tiDE ARE4 PROJECT Un STORM DRABa Ra3TALLATION Page 86 Gf 155 • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 87 of 155 DE OR OFNMPLETED DAT pP MD PRO2ELl9 PIACED M GAS MGAg VIR2TY PROJECT IRB,ITYPI MSERVICEOR NE MMAS PLANIM NUMBER COSF RRRRRDDDRMG2003 BENEF[i'ED L nON PURPOSEOFPR016CT SERVICE 20038160 2,321 MSTALLATIONOFPPEAND ALLNSIOh439S CEDARPARE SYS D MSION Aug APPURTENANCES -META 35 DUETONSTOLPR =OF 6 -PLASTIC PPE GROWTH 20038186 17.635 SYSTEM NPROV3II.fENTS- AW.NSTO.V1E195 CIX.Aff2tCE AEPIACI! Sep REPLACE UNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCNRE 2003962G 10.743 RELOCATION OF FACD.IT@9- ALL NSTO36ERS CARROLLTON RELOCATIONTOAV M &P Rd nDLSIRBMON NNFWCTW/PROPOSED FACB.ITIESASAMULTOF PROJECT NVFRNNPN HEST 20039610 26,7/2 SYST£MB.IPROVE80iNTS- ALL CUSTOA4R5 1.9OLO1}DAN REPLACE Dx RFPLALEDEIERIORAIED MFRASTRUCfIIRE IMDERGROUNDFACLLI 2 24M 513 SYSIEMB.PROVEMENTS- ALL NSTOM1 SANANGELO REPLACE An REPLACE22EEEFOF4'BARE MFRASIRUCRRtE =PIPEW MFEETOFV 20042650 133,993 SYSTEMINPROVE0fE14I5- ALLCUSTONPRS WAN REPLACE Ox REPLACE3,100FEET OF VARINB MFRASTRUCTURE SIZES OF CASTDtONPPE WFFH I "100 FEETOF VARIOUS SIZES OF 2W4376G 8,5/3 RBOC MT OF FACEITPB- ALL CUSTOAIFR3 A WGTON RdO VDNTOAVOM &P RFIDCATEDISTR® N CONFLICTW/PROPOSED FAM=ASARESULTOF PRO3P.CT STORMDBAMMSTAL MON 20043900 1,110 SYSTEM D. D'ROVFAD'NIS- ALL NSTOMERS WICIBTA FALLS REPLACE &p REPLAC MFEEFOFPBARE D9FMSTRIICNPE 20043920 1,809 BYSTEMIDPROVEI,ID . ALLNSTObPRS ARCEPRCTIY REPLACE Scp REPLACE 100 FEETOF 2 -BARE MFRASTRUCNRE 20044906 2,906 MSTALLAIIONOFPPEAND ALLCUSTOEPRS LAMPASAS SYSTE61 ANSION Nov APPURTENANCES-MSTALL 1,190 DUETONSYOEI£R FEETOF3'PLASTICPPE, WFTR GROWDI PART W. RED.fl3URSELIENF FROM RE TING NSTO8IER 20096160 287 SYSTEM B.PROVEMENTS- ALL CUSFOMERS BROWNWND REPLACE Aug REPLACE M FEET OF 4- BARE INFRASTRUCIIRtE SI'Efl. PPE WITF140 FEET OF 4' 20047420 3.271 PPROVEAPNIS- CLACE135PI ALL NSTOMERS WICIRTA£ALLS REPLACE Oct WWSARE DbRASTll C 20047610 35900 SVSTEMP.PROVE8PN75- ALL NSTONffRS BANANGE.O REPLACE Nw RFPLAaBOFEETOF4'BARB MPMSTRUCl71RE ST PPEAND450FEETOFY BAREST FTEWIIH250= OF 4' PLASTIC PPE AND 450 FEET 20049610 51,565 RMO nONOFFACBJTPR- ALL NSIORPRS DFBOTO RdO nONTOAVO41 W RFLOCATEDISIRIB M CO luW/PROPO$EU FACdRPSASARESULTOP PROPLT STREET RECONSTRUCTION 20050470 0,3v SYSTEM PPROVFMQ . ALLCUSTOb1FRS WHTIESBORO REPLACE Dee REPLACE 854 FEETOF V BARE MFMSTIIUCNRE S=PPE238FE W2' WRAPPED PPE.D6PEET01F SCREWPPE,AND60FEETOF4' PLASIICPPE WITR2j IOFEETOF 2' PLASTIC PPE, AND 625=OF 20M105O 350 R6O MNOFFAC6UITS- ALLNSTOMERS WICFRTAFA S RMO TIWMAV Sep Md TEDiSTR®UUON CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FACB.RPRASARESULTOF PROTECT OOVERNAPNTAL REOU M515M 12,6M RdOCATIONOFFACBSFPS- ALL CUSM2.PRS MV o RFLOCATIONTOAVOID w RdOCATEDLSTRBUTION CONFLICT W/PROP0. FACB.ITPSASARESULTOF PRO3EC[ OOVEItT1ME 2051806 94,218 RE3DCATIONOFFACB.ITIFR- ALL NSIO).PRS FNNIB 362DCATIONTOAV M Dtt RdOCATEDLSTRTBUFION CONni W/PROPOSED FACRITIESASARFSIE.TOF PROTECT STREET RECONSTRUCTION 20053156 1,12 SYSFFA6 UPR0VEB1d - ALL NSTOMERS SAN ANGdO REPLACE Nov REPLACE IOU FEETOF 2' BARE D9FRASTRUCNRE ST PTE WITH 100FEEFOF2- Page 87 of 155 • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 88 of 155 ON OF COMPLE [MTEPWCFA PROJECTS PSACED Dl GAS W G.3512IDJ1V PRO.IECT GITLRYPIANTUS SEANCE OA CUSE0.16R8 NUMBER COST RET DURING30R1 LOCATION PURPOSE OFPAUBECT Smwa' 6ERVICE 20053430 500 SYSTEM 6.iPROVE34NT3- LE SHED ALL CfISTOtAERS M=AFALLS REPLACE Sep REPLACE 100 FRET OF T BARE INFRASTRU'NRE 2005/080 105 COSTDICURRFDWTIH ALL CUSTO3.RR4 FORT WORTH CASTS G4CIIRREDIN Sep - REMOYALOFFACLLRIE3- REIfRINO FACERTFS MOVDl=BUM 105170 H2 YTIIWIWN- LLCSOME N NGO REPAC Da RCE0MTOFI' MFRASTRLY-NRE OF STEEI. PGR WRH 300 FEETOF 2" 2005/946 49.047 SYSTEM PIPROVESIEMS- ALL CUSTOMERS DALLAS REPLACE Dm RFTIO FEETOF 6^GST IlJFRASIRUCIVRE GPIPE WRHTp FEET OF 1' M55160516G 103,851 SYyONMSTEM PIPROVF.S¢lITS- ALL CUSi0MER5 DALLAS REPLACE Da REPLACE]TOFEETOF 4•GST INFRASTAUCNRE IXON PIPE WRH==OFV ZOOSTl]G 11,423 - SYSTEMD.SPROVESOSMS- ALL CUSTOMERS DALLAS PPPLACE Dec REPLACE L100 FEET OF 4' CAST Dh'MSTRUC[IRtE MON PSE WRH 1 IOD FEEL OF l' 20056186 1,780 SYS ALL NSIOMEAS WICIRTA FALL$ REPLACR OU CE13ROYFI.IIHTS- REPLACE 136 FEEL OF I•BARE INFRASTRUCTURE 2OD5716G 11,Y15 SVS]FMU.iPR ALL CUSION0L5 SANAN0EL0 REPLACE Ott OF2'B BARE REPLACE 100 = FEET OF T WFRASTRUCIISRE SPGR WRH 100 FEED OP 3' 200580/6 8.986 SYSTIYST10N m1PI8OYEA4]RS- ALL CUSTOMERS SANANGELO REPLACE Nov REPLACEDE ARTED ORRASIRLYTVRE UNDERGROUNDFACG.IHFA 20058126 7.652 SYSIFMIMPROVEMEN' ALL CUSTOMERS ABG.ENE REPLACE Dec REPLACE395 FEE39s 2•BARE INlMSTRUCNRE S1ID,PffEEONH 5F1£T OF 2• 20081296 28 0] RISTALLAT PIPEAND CDS4.IDtCLV. DALLAS SYSTEM EXPANSION Sep MI APPURTENANCEUepW ALL 34] DUE T MER FEEFOF T PLASTICPbE GROWTH ROWH 200611'!0 4,ITI SYSTEMG.iPROVFl..OF2' - ALL CUSTOMERS LTTII.EEW REP Sep REPLACE116 ACADEMY GIFRASTRUCRTRB U STEELPU'EWREI 120FTBARE 3' 200H96O 4jOB FIFEETOF LNSTALI.ATION OF]NSML RESmEM'W. Cp,D1A SYS[EMEXPANSION Deo APPURTFIOANCE4-I DDE TOCUSTOMER ES. D[STR®NITON FACGATffE, WIFN GROWTH PARTIAL REQ.IBURSES@R FROM UFSTING CUSTOMER 3W65RG 1,358 SYSTFMU.GROVEMEHIS- ALL NSTOStERS STEPfRNVU.I.E REPLACE Sep REPGCE BOFEETq'1•BARE 1NFRASIRIX.TURE STEEL PGR Atm 33 FEET OF 2' �4'PL�=M�32W BARESTEFI. PBE WR FFPTOF FEET OF 2" 20071120 I,BTI COMMFRCLV. WACO SYSTEM EXPANSION Oct AP Im DUE DUENNSTOMER �WSTALLAnONOFPUMAND OF2-ANCE4-OISTALL FEE[OF 3" PLASTIC PGR, WRH GROWTH REISIBURSEBfElR FROM RE UESTG46 CUSTOMER 2011)9010 18,292 RELOC UON FFACGATfE3- ALL CUSTOMERS =0RELOCAHONTO AVOm Oc[ MM RELOCATE DISTRIBUTION CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FACG.RASARESULTOF PROIEL-T STREET R TRU 200)6996 239 - SYSTEM G.BROVEeffN15- IWRO ALL CUSTOMERS HALTOM CRY REPLACE Sep REPLACEDETERIORATm IW'RNSIRUCIURE UNDFAGR FACE 200YlOTi 11,596 0 - SYSTFMU.BROVFA ALL CUSTOMERS OLTA3Y REPLACE Oct REPGCE 180 FEET OF 6' FVB BARE D3FRASIAUCNRE 300T215O 1,133 SYSTEMISiPROYFl.1Q M.L CUSTOMERS PARIS REPLACE Dec REPGCEDETEIUORAmTm WFRASIRUCNRE UNDERGROUNDFACLLItff9 200]]460 1,495 SYSTFMNiPROVEMEMS- ALL NSTOMERS WMIERS REPLACE Sep REPLACE 110 FEEC OF T BARE INFRA3IRUC[URE STEEL PGR WRH 141 FEET OF 2• 300'18586 33,BM ItELOGHON OF FACG.fifES- ALI,CIISSOMERS RICHARDSON RELO=WPOAYOm Oa RdOGTE DISRtIDUf1ON CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FAW.TIIES AS ARESULT OF PROTECT ALLEYREIXINSTftUrnON Page 88 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 89 of 155 DFSCRBIFON DATE PUM PROJECTS PLACED M GAB pGASUFR.1']Y PRO3ELT PFFLQYPL MSERVBCEOR NSFOMERS PLANIM NUMBER COSP REFRIED DO G BENEFOMD LOCAT]ON PIIRPOSE OF PROeF-CI SERVICE 20078686 10,741 SYSFFM ]I.PROVFA4NF5- ALI, NSTONTAS XERRVILLE REPLACE Ou REPLACE2JFEEFOF3•BARE INFAAStRUCCURE B PTEAND25FEEF0174' BFEEL PTE WRN 30 FEEF OF 3' PLASTIC PPE ANO 25 FEEF OF 4" 200]BTSG 8,819 OISTALLA]IONOFPPEAI RESD3ENTIAL PARIS SYSTEMOTANSION D¢ APPURTENANCES-DJSTALL DUETONSTOL@R OISTIUB=NFACD.= GROWFB 20T1992G 2,973 SYSTEM U.TROVE6ffNTS- ALLCIISTOIvIMS MLMORO REPLACE Nw REPLACE IM FEEL OF 3' BARE TFMSTRUC SIEEL FTE WFFN 130 FEEF OF 3' 2ffl O 19,439 RELOCADONOFFACDAtIFB- ALL CUSTOMS MCBARDSON RELOCARONTOAVOm Now RF;OC MDISTRIBUIION CONFUCFW/PROPOSED FACDITIEBASAMIJLTOF PRO3F.CT ALLEY RECONSFRUCOON 2WUM 32.484 RFF.00ARONOFFACU.RffS- ALL=OlvaW ALLEN RflA UONTOAV00 N. IUMOCATEDLSIRBBUIION NNFLICFW/PROPOSED FA=ESASARESl1CTOF PRO= ALLEY RECONMUMM 2WB595G 5997 RELOCARONOFFACD.ITES- AW.CUSTO8ffR5 BRYAN RELOCATION TO AVOID S, RMOCATEDLATRIB=014 CONFLICF W/PROPOSED FACBATPSASARFSIILTOF PROIBCF WATER MMO= 2005/030 6.379 SYSTA7 DPROVFAIIDTFS- ALLNSFOlv]M BD.LSBORO REPLACE Nov REPLACE 80 F 3• BARE UPMSTRUCNRE STEEP. PTE AbID30ND 30 FEFF OF 4• WRAPPED STFII.PTE80 FEET OF 3" PLASTIC PTEE ANO 40 20087106 3,992 SYC 0.PROVE84liT'S- ALL NSTOhffRS LAWN REPLACE N. REPLACE313 WFRAS'[RUCFCRE 212=0]F FEEL OF 3• SFEEL PTEION 2008]116 1,008 0213 OF PPEAIJD NMBPRCW. QIRNLAN Nw APPURLARON APPURTENANCES-DISFALL 150 DUETOEXPAN310N DIIE iONSFOEfER FFEFOF 3' PLASTC PTE, WIIN GROWTH PART W. REO.IDURSE6ffif8 FROM TOJO NSTOEPR 3008A06 5,768 INSTALLATION OF PTE AND RFBmENDM, PRDICEFON SYSTFMEXPANSION Nw APPURTENANCEALL 150 S DUETONTOM1TR MC PH FEEF OF 3'PTB,WFIN GROWTH PARTIALREBrR`[B IDURSEMENTFROM U2SRNG NSTOA4R 30089916 56938 RELOCATION OF FACB.FFPS- ALLCLISTOMERB DALLAS RELOCATIONTOAVM Nov RELOCATEDLSTRB=ON CO F awlmo SFD FACD.TTPSASARESULTOF PROJECT HIGHWAY RFLONSTRUCFION 2009139G 8,627 SYSTEM R.TROVEEICNFS- ALL NSTOET:RS ABB.ENE REPLACE Nov REPLACB394FEETOF2'BARE IIffRASIRUCRlRE STEELFTE WIIN394FF£POF2' 2MM3G 4,803 SYSTFMR.TROVEEffNTS- ALL CUSTOMERS PALES[DJE REPLACE OS REPLACE100F OF2-STEEL JNFRASTRUC PTE WIRE 100 FEEL OF 2 -PLASTIC 20094186 3,647 INSTALLARONOFFD'EAM3 RFSmENRAL CEDARlO.L SYSIEMEXPANSION O4 APPURTENANCES-MSTALL DUETONSTOMER DISTR®URONFAMITM, WIRI GROWTH PARRAL REII,fBmEI.O:NF FROM 11ESTIW CUSTOMER 20096110 7,161 RELOCAMD]OF ALL NSTOEPRS FLOWER RELOCARONTOAVOm Dec RELOCATE SMACB.ON MOUND CONFLIFROJE OPOSED AS OF FAC61T'ffS AB A R PROTECT STREET RP.CONSTINCIION UM 3009TI7G ;401 A3StALLARON OF PPE AM3 RFSDJENRAL BRYAN SYSTFMP)TMMON Oil APPURTENANCES-DJSTALL DIIE TO NSTOE�RR DISTRIBURON FACD.RFS,= GROW PARTW.amial RSEAffFRFROM RE UESi1NG NSIOMER Page 89 of 155 • C J 17A ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID -'AFX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page goof 155 DESCROTION OF NMPLE DAlEP PROJECTS PLACED w GAS FDLIT wcAsnTw PROJEC[ OR UI'dRETIRE NSNOMEIIS NOAOER COSI WURLNG 2M RETIREDUIIDIeG BRNF:PIIED ON PURPOSE OF PROJECT SERVICE Re VICE 30w824G 11811 IJSTALLAnON OF PPEAND ND COMNIERCJAL 3EDUtp CEDARPARK SYSTENE Nov APPIIATENANCFS-wSTAII DUET b1ER DiSTR®UTION FACD.Rff4, GROWTH GROWTH FWITHim PARTIALINOCUITOE FROM UFSTw6CUSNOMER 2W9882G 4,083 SY ALL CfASTOMlltS GRANGER REPLACE ON CIEOROVEMENT3- REPLACE63 DPRASIRUC[IIRE ND95FTBARE STED.. PPE AND (WITH M F MT BARE STEEL PPE WQH ]O FEET OE z^ Mwrnc PPEAND Iz FEETOF 20099956 2,812 RFIOCAnON OF FACOAnES- ALL CUSNOAfERS WICHITA FALL$ RFIOCATIONTOAVOID On RFIOCATED[5M®UFION NWlICI W/PROPOSED FACI]L=!t ASARE9ULTOF PRDJECN 00VERNhffiT IMT 20100576 9,10 RE TIONOFFACILITPS- ALL CUSTOMERS LANCASTER ItMOCATIMMAVOID Oe RELOCATEDISNRWITIION CONFLTCNW/PROPOSED FACB.ITIFSASARESIB.TOF PROJECT DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION 30100]10 12f97 SYSTEMI.IPROVEL.@NTS- ALL CUSTOMER3 W m REPLACE Dx REPLACE 50D FIMT OF V IUA wFRA51RlICfIIRE 30100/80 3,178 w5'TA TION OF PIPE AND COMMERCIAL WACO SYSTEM ANSION Nov APPURTENANCES-]NSIALL2 DUETOCUSTOMER FFITOF2'MMlTlCP@EAHD OROWJH Rffi15TATE5150FTP T(C PPF, WITH PARTIAL RE I.IBURSFMENTFkom 20102660 13,358 SYSTES50.PROVFMENI3- ALL CUSTOMERS CORSICANA REPLACE Dec RIP aDETEwomm wFRASFRUCIURE llNDEROROUNDFACdR1E5 2w05156 6,713 RELOCAnON OF FACI.ITIES- ALL NSNOMElt3 LONGVIEW RELOCawlm AVOID Oct TEDISTRJBUnON (OREW CONFLI FACM FAOI.NfIFS AS ARESULTOF COUNTY) PROMCOPOSED PAOJECF sTORCATlON 30107166 3,133 RELOCAnONOP FACdITIES- FFAM=- ALL CUSTOMERS FORFIEY RELOICTWI OAVOID Otl CONFLIPROMCTOPOSED TPSAS ARESULT FAMlATEDISTRI U,T PROJECT if STREETTIMOFIRUCIION STItEE 30107480 15,143 RFIOCAnONOFFAC61TIE5- ALL CUSTOMERS ALLEN RQ.OGnON IY]AVOID Op It®UTI,T RELOCA[E!t CONFLICT W/PROPOSED Mt FACI.rtPSASA PROJECT OJIXTOF STORMSImFtto OJER 30107RG 15,129 SYSTE ALLCUSNOMER3 SFPRMAN REPLACE Nev IEMFIMEMFNN9- REPLACE370FEE370 2'BARE QiFRAS[RUCNRE SII]I.PIPE WN EET OF Y 30107996 38P13 OF PI] DISTALLAHON OF ALL CUSNOM}RS MCKwF1EY SYSEITD PANSION Dec MSTA L DUETONSTOFIDt FiatToTENANCE cpumwI N FEETOP6'PLA5GC PPF, WITH GROWTH RERIDURSEMENTFROM ILIEQ RE IIEtTINOCUSTOAfER 301031Hi 13,560 E COM BRYAN AC O lUMAC7Z7(* Ol`4-SnI wnUCIURE FIFE,INSTAL440 FEET OF 2- 201103M 18,813 0.PROMTOI'V3- ALL NSNOb1ER3 SAN ANGELO REPLACE Nav REPIACEJ ET OF 4• BARE MIAC WFRASnHJCRJRE WTI STEELPPt&RO 300 FEETOF O' MIIOSOG 19,2II SYSTEMDPROVEMFCR ALL CUSTOMERS DENISON REPLACE Dx REPLACET90 PEEN OF 4' BARE wFRASTRUCNRE SI PPE 390 FEET OF 4' 20111950 ]9,1'17 REIOGTION OF OP FACLLITIFS- N ALL NSTOMHIS ADDISON RELOCATIONTOAVOID Drc RdOCATEDISTR®UTION NNFnCTWIMOPOMD FACRJTPSASARFSIJLTOF m PROJECT GOVERNMENTAL mIIESI 20114016 M3 C tFFA WTITITHE ALL NSTOMER3 CUARKSW.LE COST3 DRCIIRREDW 0.t RF OVw OF REl1R1NG FACOJTPS W DISTIUEtUITPS- REMOVED151R1BIITION 20114930 10,490 MIEN[ ALt NSTONIER.S SANANGEIA REPLACE Nov OF`3'S- RFPLAClMWlTH325 3'BARE wFRASntUCOME STEEL PPE WITH ]25 FEEL OF ]' Page goof 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 91 of 155 DF.SCRHMON OF CO. DATEP CKD PROJECTS PLACED IN GAS wGAS VNJII' PBP/ECT URLTTYPL WSERVICEOR CUnDmRS PLWIw NUMBEB COSI RETIREDDUHPiGM HENBFIIFJI lA MON FURPOSEOFFROJELT mmm 20115206 3338 SYSTEM OA'ROVEMENIS- ALLNSTOMERS SF@RMAFI RPPLACE OG RFPLACEDETERIORATED wFRASTRUCNRE UNDECO. 201153]6 17.MSYS'I}M NIIWRDfA O.@ROVEMENIS- ALL NST08®L4 dEBURNE REPLACE N. EDETERIDRATED 1NFRASTRUCIURE I=ER UOSTW OUNDFAC6rt@S N111916G 118 COS ALL CUSTOMERS TEMPLE COSTS wamamw N. Vw OIFEDWrtHT REMOVAL OF FACIlI[@5-REPwE REPHtOJO FACIl.IIlES 310FEE-IWWRAPPEDTFII S 301193]0 2,6M SYSTAJU.@ROVEMEN'IS- ALL CUSTOMERS PALESTwE REPLACE M REPLACE IOFOFYSTEEI.P@E RVFRASIRUCIURC WITH IOFFFTOF017 PPLASTICP@E 201 19n 10,2w RELOCATEDIS ALL CUFIOAffR4 COLLEGE RFlIX'ATIONTOAVOID OS UTIQIES- RELOCAI8015TfpBVI10N STATION CONFLICT WIPROPoSED FACO.IT@S AS AR PROTECT UMONF STREEIRECONSIRCOO 301310Ri 4,953 RELOCATEDIS=ACO.PI@S- ALL NSTONIER3 COMMERCE RELOCA OG FELOCATE06AMULTN W/FOMV CONFLICT WJPROPoSED FACO,RGEFR ARESULT OF PROTECT DRAwAGEPNOF P 20122]DG J.863 wSTALLATION OF PIPE AND RF30)ENPIAL [BARICFTt SYSIEMEXPANSER Nov 100 HEIGFPIS DUETOCUSTOMFR =01FFNAN CIPSTALL PFETOFTFLASTIC P@E GROWTH 20123/86 28,137 SYSTEMAIPR ALL NSTOMFRS WACO REPLACE Da REPLACE 1.600FEETOF ]=OFV 4' wFRASTRUCIURE 172' Oy PO'E WITHJ30FEET- 2• 20123JSp 159,561 SYSFA1 E8ffN ALC CUSTOMER$ WAN REPLACE Da 2.P F 2,100FEEI OF 4•G V wFRASTRUCNRE MONPM OBDNP@E W[!H t00FEEf OF 2' 2 20124200 586 SYLACE2@ROET ALLCUSTObffiRS HALLWGFA REPLACE OU OF 3'S- REPLACE 201 FEET OF 3' BARE wFRA5TI8UCNIRE STEF], PIPE AND 69 FEEP OF 3• WRAPPED ST1ET, PIPE WITFI2T! 30126806 1,157 SYSTASO.@ROVFA031T5- ALL NSTONffR.4 FORTWORM REPLACE UP EOETERIORAIID OBFRASTRUCIIIRE UMIER CO.R@3 U06TWC 30138996 ]30 RR]M COSOVCOFFOWI113THE ALL CUS'lOM1tdtS iAsl.E COSTSw ps REMOVAL FAC - A=E REIIRWOFACO.IT�4 16 ABANDON i6 FEET OF 4' PLASTC OF PIPE ANDFEET OF 4' BARE S IDPTE N113061G 62,766 RAOCATIDNORIBUTIT@S- ALL NSJONffRS OiVw6 RELOCATIw/MMOOJ Ds RELOGTE DISTRIBUTION CONFLICT W/PROPoSED FAC6.iIlE ARFSULTOf PROJECT DEE. ' PR 2013114O B,fl36 TEPROIECI RELOCATI AW. NSI'OM1IDi3 DAdA3 RELOCATIONTOAV On RAOCA DsmBCGPI@S- CONFLICIW/PROPOSED m ASTRHiUTION AS ARESULT OF ROAD PROIF.CI IMONSTR RECONSTRIICIION 30131306 33,846 SYSIFJd OAPAAVEMENTS- ALL NSTOh@RS DALLAS REPLACE Da REPLACB216FEET OFB'WRAPPED D@RASTRUC[URE STEELP@E WTIHYRFEET OF B' 20131980 4,730 wSTALLATION OF P@EAND COMMERCW. ENMS SYSTAf E)@ANSION Dec IBUMNCES-wSTALL DUETROWH MER D15TR1HUTIONFACOJTIEq WITH DMT GROWTH PARTIAL R@.iH11RSFMA'T FROM FffR RE UESTM10NCE 20133596 3,116 P OVSTALLATION OF PIPE AND RFSmINIIAL any SYSMO Nw APPUCES-w3FALL i90 DUiOCUSTM]ER FOFYMACP@F� GROWTH PARI W. REOIBURSFMENI m FROM RE TMG NSTOM1@R 30133866 47J16 SYSTEM U@ROVFAIDVIS- ALL NSTOMERS DALLAS H65TALLATIONOR Dee REPLACE DISIAIBOR OF REPLACESTlm STATION WIIN ABOVE -GROUND GLUM REGULATION 201328]6 35,955 SYSTEM 0.@ROVEA4NP3- ALLN517 DALLAS wSTALLATION Oft Da REPLACEDIWKIa RFA TOR REPLACEMENT OF STATION WTTR ABOVE MUM REGIOATION Page 91 of 155 Ll • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2OD3 Page 92 of 165 DF.36RRTION OF COMP DATE PLAM FROPECTS PLACED M GAS W GASUTR.ITY PROTRCI' UITLfl'Y PLANTWSERVICE OA COSTOMERS PIANIw NIwOEA COST II I)DURD4G 2008 BENEFITED LOCATION FUAFOSEOFPRO3E SERVICE M13MM 39,103 SYSIFAI DAPROVEMENFS- ALL CUSTOMERS DALLAS INSTALLATION OR Da REPLACEDISIRICTMMATOR REPLACEMENTOF STATIONWITHABOV ROUND REOULATION 20132986 38.906 SYS] IMIROVFMEN35- ALL CUSTOMERS OA1,W PISTAIL TION OR Da RENACE DISTRICT REGULATOR RFPI.ACENIEF7TOF STATION WTWABOV -GROUND REGULATION M13300 37,4M SYSTEMIMPROVEM1 S- ALL CUSTOMERS DALLAS WSTALLATIONOR Da REPLACEDISTRICTRFAULATOR REPLACEAffNFOF STATION WITH AB GROUND MEASUREMENT OR REGIDATOR I REGULATION 20133140 55,786 SYSTAS"ROVFMENIS- ALL CUSTOMERS DALLAS WSTALLATTON OR Da IUMACEDISTRICTREOULATOR RFPLACEMENTOF STATION WITH ABOVEGROUND MEASUREMENT OR REGULATOR REGULATION 201DIWi 36,172 SYS VOROVEMENTS- ALLCUSTOMERS DALLAS WSTALLATTON OR Ds REPLACEDISIRICTMULATOR REPLACEMENT OF STATION WITH ABOVEGROUND MEASlIREFIWT OR REGULATOR REGULATFW 20139M 15,401 Rp.00AT i4OFFACB.DIES- ALLCUSTOMERS BF3.TON RELOCATION TO AVOID Nw RELOCATEDIST11B=ON CONFLICTW MOPOSED FACILOM SARPSULTOF PROJECT STREEFRECONSTRUCITON 20139166 2,283 WSTALLATIONOFPDBAND PUATFOWT SYSTEM ESG'ANMON Ott APPURTENANCES-WSTALL DUBTOCUSTOMIM WSTR®Ul20NFAC0.RIES GROWTH 20146170 8,%2 RELOCATION OP FACD.ITIFS- ALL CUSTOMERS DENTON RELOCATION TO AVOID On RELOCATEDISTR®VIION CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FAC6ITTESASARERJLTOF PROJECT SEWER OVF3tffiBTS 20147136 25JM SYSTEM D.OROV@.1ENTS- ALLCUSTOMFRS GEORGETOWN SYSTEMEUP ON Dec PIJRCHASEDlMlJBUTTON DUETOCUSTOA FACD FROM DEVELOPER OROWTII M14MM 10,142 RELOCATIONOFFACB.ITM- ALLCUSTOMERS ROUNOROCR RELOC MMTOAVOE3 Nw RELOCAIEDISTRIBUTION CONFLICTWIPROFOSED FACHJ=ASARPSULTOF PROJECT STRFBTIECONSTRUCSION 20149420 4,855 RELOCATIONOFFACdIRES- ALL CUSTOMERS MCTPOWT RQACATION TO AVOID M RFlOCATEDISTRBU110N CONFLICTWIPROP m FACB.NIESASARFSULTOF PROTECT CULVERTMTALLATION W151410 2,126 SYSTEM w1PROVEMENT4- ALL slum ERS ABH.ENE REPLACE Nw REPLACE348FEETOFPBARE IffMSIRUCIURE S=PlPE WlTlf Ul FEETOF C MISSIG 115,9]1 WS AT1014WPOEAND ALL CUSTOMERS lWiOO FORTTFTCATIONOR Dec APPURTTWANCPS-WSTALL 3,500 SYSTEMlwltoMEN] FEETOFVKL CPPE 20151580 18,119 RE TIONOFFA�- ALLCUSTcN PLANO RELOCATIONTOAVOD Nw RELOCATEpiS'TR®llT10N CONk1ICTWIPROFOSED FACHJTHM SARFSULTOF PROJECT ALLEY RECONSTRUCTION 20151620 %9 SYSIEMIMPROVEMENTS- ALLCUSTOMERS 13 LL 0 It REPLACE Od REPLACE 3SI FEET OF 3'BARE WFft MUCIURE STEEL ME WIIH355FEET OF2' 201517W 7,167 SYSTEMD OVEefftIT4- ALLCUSTOI6ERS C URNS REPLACEECPOSID Drs REPLACEERPOSEDPRE FACO.ITIF_5 20152936 3,449 RELOCATION OF FACLIIIES- ALL CUSTOMERS COLLEOE IUMOCATIONTOAVOID Ott RELOCATEDISIR®UNION STATION CONFLICIWIPROP08ED FACE3it MARESULTOF PROJECT 00VFRNL¢I4 UEBT 20155M 167 WSTALLATION OF PPEAND COMMERCIAL DALLAS SYSTFMERPANSION Da APPURTENANCES- WSTALL SII DUETO CUSTOMER FEETOFPPLASDCP@EANDS GROWTH FEET OF 2-PLASNCM WITH PARTIALRlo]43 SENiENTFROM RE IJESTW6CUSTOMER Page 92 of 165 • C CI ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Pape 93 of 155 DES�ON OF COMPLETED PR0aMPLACEDINGA3 �,� PLA® PBWECT 112 L-TTYPLANTINSERVICEOR CUSTOMERS MGABUIIlm. PIANT DI NUMBER COST RETIXED DURING 20D BENEFITED LOCATION PURPOBEOFPRO2ECT SSWCE 20135670 56 COST INCURRED WTIH THE ALLCETOMFRS WI=AFALLS COSTSTNCURR W w REMOVAL OF FACS.=. RDIRING FACB2TEES ABANDON 1%FEEFOF 1.24 WRAPPEDS7IEELFOE 20156100 5JU R45TALLATIONOFPIPE AND REIDENTLIL CEDARHB.L SYSTEM EXPANSION N. APPURTENANCES -INSTALL IW DUETOCUSTOSffib FEETOFr PLmTICPBE GROWTH 2015610 ]jD 14SL ATION OF FA(=IES- ALL CUSTOMERS PLANO RELOCATIONTOAVOD ll•< RELIX'ATEDISTIUBUDON CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FA(=ESASAMULTOF PROg.C-F STREEIRECONSTRUCHON M156M 26,788 SYSTEM B.OROVEMEMS- PLL CUSIOSffR-S ABB.ENE REPLACE Nov REPLACE150FEETOF6'BARE D4FRASIRUC[VRE SLID. POE AND 9 FEE OF 3' �OFWPLASTICPJPEAND10= BARE S)FF]. PIPE WTIH ISO PEST 20156%O 219 SYSFQ.ti OVEMENTS- ALL=TOMSS WIC AFALLS REPLACE Oa REPLACE35FEEFOF2-SIID.POE p�'Rg5]RUL-TURP 20IM90 2,991 B4$TALLATIONOFPOEAND REIDEN'fUL FARE SYS] EXPANSION Nw APPURTENANCE -INSTALL 100 DIIHTOCUSTOM.ER FEEFOF2-PLASTICPOE GROWTH 2015707G 2,306 NSTALLATIONOPPOEAFD COM ML PARIS SYSTEM EXPANSION Nov APPURTENANCE -INSTALL 100 DUETOCUSTOSOR FEETOF2'PLA CPIPIE D55 GROWTH FEET OF 124 PLASF2C PIPE WFCE PA!t W RE0.@URSEAffNF FROM REQUESMO CUSTOMS 2010DO 808 RELOCATIONOFFACILTIOS- ALL CUSTOMERS WIC AFALLS RELOCATIONTOAVOD Dec RFLOGIEDIS1RiBURON CONFLICT W/SOFO E FAM=ASAIU=TOF PROTECT EASES4O4T6SIRS 2016tWO 6,720 RE TIONOFFAI ROS- ALL CUSTOS IUSIM RECO UONTOAVOID Oct RELOCATEDISTRIBIMON CONFLICFW/PROPOSED FAC IT[ESASAREULTOF PROJECT CULVSSN'SFALLATION 20162000 628 SYSFEM OVEt.GN ALL CIISTOSO]IS WACO REPLACE Op REPLACEBFEETOF2'WRAPPED INFRASTRVCFIIRE SFEEL POE WITH 9 FE IOFr 2016363G 50,141 RE TIONOFFACO2TIE9- ALL CUSTOS@ltS UFSOTO RET.00ATIONTOAVOD Nav RELOCATEDISFRBIUMON CONFLICPW/PROPOSED FA(=[ESASAREULTOF PROTECT SDEWALKPROSECF 20165010 Ij08 SYSTEI'l ROVEIHEMS- ALLCI]STOMSS TEMPLE REPLACE Da REPLACEE FEETrBARE WFRASIitUCIURE STFEET OFY POBWITH137 20165080 (263) INSTST ALLATION OF POE ANp COM6IERCW, CLYDE SYSTEM EXPANSION Dec APPURT 180 DUE TOCIISTOSO2i 2']?L-DISTALL FEEFOFI PLASTIC POE A, OROWIH WITH FEETOF135•EW REB.IDIRfSFbDIIJTFROM FILOM IIETD40 CTJSTOMER 3016%70 15,270 SYSTEMI6OROVOMTEB- ALL CIISTOAffRS BONXAM REPLACE On D REPLACE EIFRIORATED 1NFRASTRUCIIIRE UNDERGROUNDF 261%51G (%) POE MI BJSTALLA33ON OPPIPEAND C084.IIRCIAL ROUND ROCK Dee APPURTENANCE-DISFALL DUETOCUMIAON DUE TOOUSFOhfflt DISIRTBUTIONFAm.ROS, WITH GROWTH RFAIBI1RSFb.>ms FROM IIESTIIIONOFPIPI]t 2017%3G (610) ANON OF CO6R.ORCW. ROUND ROCK SYSIEMEXPANSION Dec APPUlt N INSTN APPU TALL DUE OAff2t 1M DISTIL®UTION FAC6FIIES, WITH FAMI' Glto GROWTH REBvIDURSFMFM FROM l3ESTM0 cusTGME 201]IO]G 2303 SYSTAS D.ORGVEMENT$- ALL GUSfOMER3 BONHAM REPLACE Oct REPLACENS FEEF OF 6'BARE INFRASTRUCIVRE 5141 POE ANO f 0 FEEF OF 0' BARESTEE[. POE WITHO%PEEP Pape 93 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 94 of 155 CO.WLETED PROJECFSP"C WOAS oATR PUCeo PROIRCT UTDJTYPN.A MSERWUOR NSIOMRRS BYGASDLOIIY 1103336{ COS! RATlA6D DUBD1G 300] REIREPII'6D LOCAT POAPOSEOPPROJECT PL6Mb SFIYIR 201>1350 32,121 RELOCATION OF FACO.UIE9- ALLNSTOMFRS CARROLLTON RELOGT MAV= Da RELOCATE DISTRIBUTION CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FACO.ITf6 AAESIATOF PROTECT SEWER PROTECT SOIR]30 13,012 SYSTEM IMPROVE6 s -RETIRE ALL NSTOt.¢RS SIPRM.IN REPLACE Da 475Q2'BARESTEEI.PPE PIFMSIRUL'II1RE J06 FEET OF S• BARE SLID, PPE AND RELOCATE ATIACIPD SERVICP LDP3 301]3360 IU SYSTEM IBPROVEMENIS- ALL NSIOAffRS BELLMEAD pEPLACE Oq REPLACE 12 FE£1' OF 2' BARE Re"RASiRllCIURE SLID. PPE WITH 12 FEET OF 2' ]OIM390 ]a3) SYSTEM D.PROVEAPJTIS- ALL NSTOAffRS CLARIL9VBJ.F REPIACE Nw REPLFEE I'BARE WFRASIRUCRRfE STEEL PPE TE EWRH 120 20 1 FFfT OF 1' 301%110 7]39 SYSTEM S 0 - ALL CU6TOAffA.9 BRYAN IIFPLACE D¢ REPLACE 350 330 FEET OFOF 3'I'STID, fNFRASTRUCHiRE ZOI76410 1]51 SYSTQAfAPROVEOF ALL NSTOMERS BRYAN RFPLACEESPOS® Nw REPLACE 200 FEETOF � T FACIIJid•.S PLATING PIPE 301]9630 1.181 COSTNC FDW[IHNITE ALL NSTOMERS SAN ANG0.0 COSTS 06LTIRRIDW N. ABdRWAL OF FACBJ REIIXOIO FACO,ITPS ABANDON 562 ■EET OFF 2' P WRAPP PISIIMTPPEAND ALL ZU FEETOF T PLASTIC 201A610 13,118 SVSTFMMENTS 0 - ALL CUSTOAfiA3 $AN ANOELO REPLACE INc REPLACE 55735>£EPI OF 2'BARE DP'ApgigU(.TUpE STEFI SIH531FEATOF3• COA9g]LCUL ARCIBR CITY SYSIQ6BJ0'ANSRAI Nov 20130190 430 M6TALLAmm; P LTM APPURTENANC STA DUETONSTOASR CPHTALL220 OF Y PLASHCPPE, WRU GROW2H PP PAAm RFJ6IBIIRSEMENT FRGM AE U%eNWGNSIPA _"PPE 301b120 INTI DATALLAIION AND ALL N31084RS CEDAR HB3. SYSTEM EXPANSION Dec APPURNAHANCES-INSTALL DUE TONSTIX.ffA OFYSREMAOJ4, WTMPARTLJ. GROWTH RE0.IBURSFA4N'T FROM AE UES2INGCUSTOMER 30181310 203 COSTRICU TIHTHE ALL NSTO6IDL4 NOLANVdLE COSTS B6LTI350W Nw RFMOVALOPFACFACBJIIER- REIIRBiO FACB.ITP3 ABANDDNIRFEETOP 3' WRAPPED STEEL PPE 30181330 3,114 SYSIFMB.PROVERIEN3S-ALL NSTOAffJLS WICHITA FALLS REPLACE Nw REISACE30FFPTOF6'SNFF2.PPE DPRASIRUCTURE WITH W FEET OF 6• PLASTIC PPE 3013Y/50 113).95 SYSTi9AB.PROVEMANib- ALL CUSTOMERS ROUFID ROIX DISTALLA Dx D16TALL DISIAICTREGUTATOR REPIACEMENTOF Tw STATON REOIAATTON 2018]110 Iljp SYSTEM DPAOVEMENIS- 5= -CUSTOMERS TEMPLE B3STALLATION OR Dx EOLSIRICT REGULAHIR RFPLACFA4P nATIO SIAH REGULATION N 30183330 1,813 RELOCATION OF FACdi'TIE$- ATI. CUSTOF4A4 SOUf}IlAKE RELOCATION TO AVOm Nov RAJ-OCATEDISTRIDUHON CONFLICT W/PROPOSFD FACn FnRC ASARESULTOF PROTECT GOVERNMFRo UEST 301M390 797 SYSTEM B.PROVEMINIS- ALL CU5106ffRS WICIBTA FALLS REPLACE Da REPIACE30 FEETOF 3'BAAE B8'RASTRIICNAE STEEL PPE WOF1J0FE 2' 30192050 10,993 S AMD.PAOVEME. ALL NSTOMFR$ COLLEGE REPLACE Dr RFPI.2'S ACEJ35FEETOFTSTID. STAIMN OPRASIRUCNRE PPE WITH 135 FEETOF T PLASDC 30193550 7,136 SYSTEM UPROVETPNTS- ALL CU3TOMEA3 WACO REPLACE Nw RBPIACE100 FEEL OF STEEL DPRASIRUCNRE PPE WTIH 125 FEET OF 2' PLASTIC 20193ISG 19,713 SYSIEMO.PROVEM ALL CUSTOAPRS MESQUITE REPLACE FACdH43 Dx CPMLOWE0. J50 FFiT OF 4' PLASHC PPE Page 94 of 155 F- I L • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 95 of 155 115 o nm D PROJECTS PLAC D w GAS rz euC6D DA"�b PROJECT ITINfY PLANTINSERVICH OR mSTOMER9 , NUMBER COSI' RC'ITRGU DURING SOB BENEFRED LOCAYIOf1 PURPOSSOFPRO2SLT PLANew SFRVICB 2019100 19,78 SYS[EMD OVFMENIS- qLL CUSTOM0R3 DALLAS wSTAUwnON OR Nw INSTALL DISMUCFREGULATOR REPLACFl.IDPF OF STATION REGULATION B193M0 n wSTAuAnm OF P@ AND COMOARCW. DALLAS SYSTEM EXPANSION pee APPURTENANCES -INSTALL 359 DIIETONSTGMD FMTOFI• TICPEE7FEET GROWTH OF 2' PLASDC POR AND 6 FEEF OF S-PLASGCPEE WRH PARTIAL REOBURSFAfl'•ITT FROM IIESFING mSTGMFR 20191600 1,997 INSTALLAnON OFPBEAND RESG3EITDAL LONE GAR SYSTEM EXPANSION Nw APPURTENANCES-OISTALLO DUEMG STOMER FEETOF2'PIASTICP GROWTH 20195320 6$65 RELOCAnMOFFACGPTES. ALL NSTOMERS COPPERASCOVE RFLOCAnM TO AVOID Dec RFLOGTEDISMUBUIION CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FACB.SASARE TOF PROARC STORM GRAIN INSTALLAnON wSTALLAnONOFPOEM✓D 20195510 2,132 RESIDINI'W, CADDOMG.LS STSTEMESPANSION N. APPURTENANCES -INSTALL DUETOCUSIIX.O]e DISTREUIIONFACR.UES, WRN GROWTH PARTIAL RE0.EURSEMENF BY I3FSTIIIC CUSTOMER 2019)00 15.936 SYSTEMB OVEAffN1S. ALL CUSTOM4]13 DALLAS REPLACE N. REPLAC8262FEEIOFW WRAPPED 04FRASTRUCH3RE STEEL POE FI FFEf OF 6• 301%350 23,125 RFLOCATIONONOFFACG3TES- ALL CUSTOMERS COLLEGE RELOG AVOID ]lov FFI-0CATEDISTREIIUON STATION Wl CONFL3PRO PROPOSED IECONSTRSULTOF PROJECT STR=FAC STRFFTRECONSIRUC2IGN 20198nO 1,05 SYSTEM 0.PAOVEBENIS- PLL CUSTOMERS DALLAS REPLACE Nw OD'RASTRUCNRE WbFREDETE8 UNpERGROU[D FA0LACRUES SYSTEM O.iPROVEMENT4- 30300120 39,598 AI.L CUSTTMEJeS SAN ANGM0 REPLACE Dee REPLACE 293 FEET GF 6' BARE wFRA31RUCT1IRE STSTALIA WRN336FERTOF 6• 80 E1780 1,313 INSTALLATIDN OF PNS ANG RESIDENTLLL SlfUthUN SYSTIMMSTMEIR N. APPURTENANCES -INSTALL 130 DUETOmSIOMffit FF£T OF 3'PLASIICPPE W 2(002080 m- REU3 AVON OF FACG.FIES- ALL CUSTOMERS SANANGELO TO AVOIDRELOCATEDISMUSGF ION /PRo=FAC SASARESULTOF ECPSTREET RECONSTRUCTION20202530 16,85] SYSTEM IMPROVEMEMS- ALLCUSTGMERS DALLASAN REPLACE DETERIORATED UCTUREUNDERGROUNDFACRITUM COST INCIIRREp WITH THE PAn�M 131 ALL CUS'roMQOL9 WAm URRFDwNw REMOVAL OF FACRFOM-REIBE FAC0JUE5130FMTOF2'BARESMMPPE 2020869(3 27,598 SYSTEM O.iPROVEMETI'IS- ALLCUSTOMFRS DALLASACE Nw REPLACE1MMMOFL3 - UCNRE WRAPPED SLID. POT W 433 FEETOF 2• PLASTIC PIPE =MSG 26.042 RE ATIONOFFACRITI S ALLC136TOMEAS LEWISVDLE RF3 MONTOAWXD tM RELOCATE DISTRBUDON CONFUCTW/PROPOSED FACG2TES AS A RESULT OF PROJECT STRE£TRIROMSTRUCOON Nima 28039 RP AnONOFFAM=S- ALL C115}OMmeS DALLAS RELOCAnONTGAWXD Nw RELOCATE USTREUTION CONFLICT W/PROPOSED FACR.InFS AS A RESULT OF PROJECT MVERTO ALLAUM 2810510 58 SYSTEM AIPROVEM - ALLCUSTOMEP.S TAYLOR REPLACE Nm REPLACE DETERIORATED INFIUSTRUCIURE UtDERGROUIID FAMR RELOCATION OF FACG,IMES- 30213/50 9Jn ALLCUSTOMERS CEDARMLL RMOCAnONTOAVOD pec RELOCATEDISOfEUDON 00 F CTW/PROPGSPD ACO2nFSASARESULTOF PROTECT CONTRACIORFGTTING MAIN Page 95 of 155 CJ 11 • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 96 of 155 DESCR ON OF COMPLETED mu PLACID PROJECTS PLACED IN GAS WGAFDTIITY PROJECT UTILF£PPL Fi SERWI OR CUSTOMERS PLA w NUMBER COST REFRIED DU G2003 BENEFITED LOCATION PURPOSEOFPROJECT SERVILE 20214030 1283 COSTINCURRIDWITNTNE ALLCUSTOETRS FORTWORTR COSTSINC ]N Nw REMOVAL OF FAC61]lE$- REFIRIIJG FACMITIES REMOVEDISTRIRUIION 2021431G 2,688 INSTALLATION OF PTE AND COMMER GEORGETOWN SYSTE ANSIDN Dec APPURTENANCES-WSTALL DUETOCUSTOMER DIS UTTONFACIJFTS,WRR GROWTH PAR13A1. REa1321RSE MENT FROM VESTING CUSTOATR 2WI1 G 35,143 RELO MONOFFAC61TIE5- ALL CUS10EIDt5 TERRPJ.L RELOCATIONTOAVOM ps RELOCATEDISTRIBUTION CONFLICTVflmo OSED FACdRTSAS ARESULT OF PROJECT SDIEETRECONSTRUCDON 20216260 224 COSTINCURREDWFTRT ALL CUSTOMERS TE -TLE COSISDNCTIR IN Da REMOVALOFFACLLITIFS-REFILE R=NG FACU= 1IFEETOFYWRAPPEDSIEEI- 20213350 299 INSTALLATIONOFFTEAND RESmENT1AL WICIITAFALLS SYSTEM fDo'MMON 1)a APPURTENANCES -INSTALL DUETOCUSTOMER DIST B® ONFACWTIES GROWTH 20219260 3,365 INSTALLAnONOFPTEANO COMMERCNL COEAfERCE SYSTEM EXPANSION Nw APPURTENANCES-U4ST Lw DUETOCU5P0648 F OF2'PLASTICPTEAND GROWTH 20219440 11 COSTINCURREDWDETI[B ALL CISSTOLTRS ABI,ENE COM NCURREDIN Nw �OVAL OF FAM=S-RE1W3 RE U FACI.ITIES n FT];T OF 2- PLASTIC PIPE =MG 1,4M DISTAL nONOFPTEAND RE9mENTlAL MARKER STSTIIA EXPANSION Da APPURTENANCES-INSTALL103 MGM DUE TO CIISTOLfER F OF2'PLASTCPIPEW GROWTH PARTDV.REI.IBURSE.fENTFROM VESTING CUSTOMER 20221400 1,938 SYSTFMDTROVE.4NFS- ALL CUSTOMERS DALLAS REPLACE Nw REPLACE DETERIORATED DTeASTRUCTURE UNDERGROUND£ACI.ITDS 20221900 3,419 SYSTEM IMPROVENTNTS- ALL NSTOMERS SULFNUR REPLACE Dx REPLACE DEIERIORAWD SPRDNQS IORASTRUCNRE UNDERGROUND FACI.RTR 20222600 1,003 SYSTFA3IMPROVEN/ENFS- ALL CUSTOMERS MALONE REPLACE Nw REPLACE DETERIORATED MRASTRUC UNOFRGROIJNDFAM= 20123386 6,011 RELOCATIONOFFACI2FIE4- ALL CUSTOMERS COLLEGE RE2ACAnONTOAVOI) Ds RELOGTEDISTRIBIRION STATION CONFLICT WI PROPOSED FAC6P£TSASARESIILTOF PROTECT STORM DRADN INSTALLATION 21=4nO 18,302 RELO nONOFFACRIRES- ALL CUSTOMERS LEAEIDFR RELO UONTOAVOII Dec RELOCATEDISTR BMON CONFLTCFWNPROPOSED FACI.TTIESASARESULTOF PROJECT SIRFPFR NSTRUC130N 20231030 603 RELOCATION OF FACI.IIIFS- ALL CUSTOMERS EARLY 0NT0 V0W RELOCAIIONTOAOWD Occ RETACATEDISFR®UT10N CUR=A FACI.ITEESASARESULTOF PROTLT DRAINAGEPROIECT 2023mv 4,207 WSTALLAnONOFPTEAND COMETRCW. MESQUITE SYSTEM EXPANSION Ds APPURTENANCES -INSTALL W DUETOCUSTOSIER FEETOFDIST UTIONM NS GROWTH =n50 17,040 SYSh 04PROVEffMS- ALL CUSTOMERS DENISON REPLACE Da REPLACE195FEET01`6' INFRASIRUCIURE STEEL PTEAND 120£E£1 2' BARES PTEWTFR195FEEL OF 4 -PLASTIC PTE AND 120 FEET 20241510 5,766 RNSFALLATIONOFPTSAND R05mENTIAL QDDI.AN SYSIEME3ANSION Da APPURTENANCES -INSTALL 117 DUETO CUSTOMER FEET0F7PLASI3CPTE GROWTH M4U$G 1,600 STSTEMDTROVFJ.TM33- ALLCUSTOLIEILS WT AFALLS REPLACE Dc RFPLACE40F U,I'STSEI.FTE DT'RASTRUCIURE W UN 40 FEET OF P PLASTIC PTE Page 96 of 155 • F • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 97 of 155 DESCRD'I10NOFCOMPLE DA2RPIAC® PRO MPLACEDw GAS w41A8I1LIlY PROTECT UTRATYFL MSERVICEOR CUSTOMERS I p51SEw NUMBER CO6T RETwF.ODDewG20a3 BRNEFTTED IACATTON PUBPOSBOPPRRT SERVICe 20249066 81 COSTwCURREDWI2HTHE AI.LCUST06 SANANGELO C 315111 URREDw Dec REMOVALOFFAC lms- RETDUNG FAMIMS ABANDON 179PEET OF 4' PLASTIC POE, m9 FEET OF 3' BARE S[EEl PUT, AP=OF 4'BARE STEE PB ITIE E 30350236 iTl SYSTEMD4RO S- ALL CIISTOM1D:RS BROWNWOOD REPLACE Dec REPLACE% FEETOF U2- 2• STLBL PIPE D8IUSTINCNRE WHH$FEETIN2-]RLASMPME m2506M 1.4% SYSTEMD.flROV -- ALL CUSTOMER$ BALLIOER REPLACE Dz REPLACES% FEET OF 6-T6'BARE 01`S wFRA$TRUC[URE STEEL PD'EN 58FEETOF 6' m25153G 2,185 RELOC OF ALL CUSIDMERS BRYAN RELOCATION Da MDISIFFAX)TION TSASTRBRITION CONFLICTW/PROPOSED omsa) FAMI FACDIIIES ASARESULTOF PROJECT GOSIM4 NTALRE 2025T/IG 250 s - ALLCUSTOMFRS DALLAS REPLACE Ilm AMB16R (MENT$- REPLACE 16 FEET T wFRASTRUCTURE 16 STEELPD'EWTD316FE OFF- 2' 20261'!36 1.068 S - ALL CUSTOA¢RS BAIT ANGEm REPLACE Da A(2]B,1R 01ENTS- REPLACE 3I FEET OP 3'BARE DJPRASTRUCNRE STEEL PIPE AND 3 EEEF OF 4• BARE CI. PIPENl)3 FEETOP 3'PTA AFID 3 FEELOF 1' mm820G 1,501 wSTALWTION OF E 11@ RESmEN'ML COLEMAN SYSTEM EXPANSION Dec APPNBTFNANCES-wSSSTALL 150 DUE TONSIOMER FBET OPY PLASTICPB'$ WRH GROWIR PARTm. � FROM RzQmiwi 20269850 189 SYSTEM ALL CUSTOMERS MORAN REPLACE Dec DIMULIE M) REPLACEDETERFAM IFRN.STRUCNR6 UNDERGROUNDFACD.POE$ 20271570 40'13 ALLAON PD'EAND COMMERCW. PORTWORTHPURTENNCES-ISTALL DUETONSTOLIERTR®UTIONFACII=S,WNN lTMOF OROWTHD.19I1RSEMENTFROM VESTING CUSTOMER mM51G I'm CMTwCURREDWITH ALLCUSTOL CLARRSVR.LE C)SlnwCURREOw Dec REMOVAL OF FACRRDS-REFIRE RET@DIG FACE.RIF3 5 PEST OF 4• STEEL PD95 AND 25 FEETOF4'PLAS17ICPR'E mVMI 237 COST wCURRID W[IH THE ALLCUSTO.WRi.S DALLAS COSTSwCUR m Dec REMOVAL OF FAMITES-REPIXE RET@wG FACB.CIIE9 321=0FV CAST M0N PD'E AND27FEETOF3' WRAPPED m28041G 147 COSTwCURREDWIIHTHE ALL CUSTOMERS COPPERAS COVE COSTSwCURREDw Dec REMOVAL% FACB.IMS-RETIRE RETBUNG FACB.ITE9 145PEETOF 2- BARE STET]. P@E 20288286 9,102 sYSTEM D.iPROVELffMS- ALL CUSTOMERS BONHAM REPLACE Dec REPLACE DEIflBIORATFD wFMS1RUCNRE UNDERGROUNDFAMIMI 20299920 185 SYSTEM D,@ROVEMEMS- ALL CUSTOMERS ABDJwE REPLACE Dec REPLACE 61 FEBT OF 3• BARE wFRASIRUCNPE m30100 6,419 SYSM41D OVESffMS- ALLNST08 HAMd1ON REPLACE Dec REPLACE 112FEEP0F4"BARE wFRASTRiICNRE STEFI. PIPE WITH 112 FEET GF V 3A]31. .G 14,748 wSTALLATIONOFPIPEAND COMP.Q;RCIALB SYSTEM-WB3E SYSIIT WANSION Apr APPURTENANCES -INSTALL INDUSTRIAL DUETOQISTOMER SERVICELM GROWIR 3ABLNEWG 5;n9 INSTALLATION OF PIPE AND RESG)EN a SYSTEM -WINE SYSIFM EXPANSION J. APPURTENANCES -INSTALL COMMERCW. DUETOCUSTOMER SF MMI.DIES GROWTH 3ABLRPLG 190,502 SYSTEM D.iPROVEMEPRs- RESB1ENTm. SYSTEM-WDJE REPLACE leu REPLACE SERVILE LINES llff RUC111RE 3ARLRPLG I84,467 SYSTFMU.PROVEMEMS- RESE3ENIVJ. SYSTEM -WIDE REPLACE lu REPLACE SERVICE LIES INFRASTRULTURE 3AIT[ M 4,625 SYSTEMU.D'ROVFAIEN't5- COMME A, SYSTEM -W E SYSTFASFJ "SIGN My .STALLSERVICE LwFS wDUSTRm. DUETOIZIIM R Page 97 of 155 4 • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 98 of 155 DESCFI ONOFco6II DAm PUCCD PROJECTS PLACED M GAS WGASDJdDY PROJECT UTIJTYPLANTBSMWCEOR CUSTOMERS I PLAMN' NUMBER COSI RETIRED DIMING 2003 BENEFITED LOCATION PURPOSEOFFROJECI SRRYIEE 3ATIINEWG 34,669 MTA nON OF PPE AND RESIDENTTALd SYSTEM -WIDE SYSTEM EXPANMON Jm APPURTENANCES -INSTALL COMAIRCUJ. DUETOCUSTOM SEANCE LI GROWTH 3ATHRPLG 81.4N SYSTEMPBROVEMENIE- RESIDENCLU. SYSTEM -WIDE REPLACE Jm REPLACESFJtVICELWES IffR.ASIR9ICNIRE 3SRYC O 37,214 WSTALLATXW OF PWE AND COMMERCW.d SYSTEM -WIDE SYSTEMEXPANMON My APPURTENANCES -INSTALL IIDUSTRW. DUETOCUSTOM4A SERVICE LI GROWTH 3BRY O 390,651 DISTALLATTON OF PIPE AND RESIDEN'MLd SYSTEM -WIDE � EXPANSION Jm APPURTENANCES -INSTALL COMAffRCW, DUETOCUSTOM SERVICELI GROWJN 3BRYRPLG 66,617 SYSTEMP OVEMBNTB- RFSIDENTW. SYSTEM -WIDE REPLACE Jm REPLAMSMR CELT D9FRASTRUCTTIRE 3BWD O 3,980 TALLANONOFFI MD COMAffitCW.d SYSTEM -WIDE SYSTFJ4 EXPANSION AW APPURTENANCES -INSTALL EVICEMNES I9DUSTRIAL DmTo CUSIOMIY GROWDI 3HWDNEWG "942 INSTALLATION OF PTFE AND RFSWE & SYSTEM -WIDE SYSTEM EXPANSION lm APPIIRTII4ANCE3-INSTAR COtafERC1AL DUETOCUSIOMER SERVICE LIBS GROWTH 3BWDRPL0 ITJ,n82 SYSTEMP OVEM4T9Y3- RFSIDENTW. SYSTEM -WIDE REPLACE J. REPLAME VTCELB 1NFRASBUC 3CLECAI.0 1,292 P93TAJ noNoFPBEAND COAO.¢RCW.d SYSTEM -WIDE SYSTEMEXPANSION My APPURTFNMM-INSTALL WDUSTiUAL DUETOMSTOM SMMMLIIS I GROWTH 3CLENEWG 140,300 1NSTALLATTONOFFBEAMJ RESIDEN 4 SYSTEM WIDE SYSTEM EXPANSION Jm APPIIRTFNANCES-WSTALL 00NDI]9CW. DUETOCUSTOBIA I SERVICE LPIFS GROWTH 3CLMPLO 31,593 SYSTEM I.iPROVEMBMS- RFSIDENTW. S"S -WIDE REPLACE J. REPLACE SPRNCELIlES E9FRASTRUCNRE 3COMD.RRO 2,0]4,80] SYSTE WPROVEMffNT3- ALL CUSTOMERS SYSTEM -WIDE PRFSSUREMONRORBJG len PURCIN.SE COMMUBCATTNG PRESSURE RECORDERS 3VEMPLG 118,017 SYST WPROVEMffiNTS- RESIDENTIAL SYSTEM -WIDE REPLACE J. REPLACESE WMLI WFRASTRUCNRE 3DLS O 505,428 INSTALLATION OF PIPE AND COMM ML& SYSIIId-WIDE SYSTFMID(PA &m My APPURTENANCES -INSTALL AIDUSIRIAL DUETOMSTOMER SE WV LINES GROWTH 3MSNEWG lj%6335 I15TAIJ-ATION OF PBE AND RESIDINIIALd SYSTEM -WIDE SYSTEM FARANSTON J. APPURTENANCES -INSTALL COMAfERCW- DMTOCUST SERVICE LIES GROWTH 3DLSRPLG ;3)9,332 SYSTEMI OVEMENT3- RESIDENTIAL SYSTEM -WIDE REPLACE lm REPLACESERVTCELINES I9FRASTRUCIURE 3EASNEW0 2,W BSTALLATIONOFFIEATID d SYSTQAWIDE SYSTEM EXPANSION Jm APPURTENANCES -INSTALL COMAfERC1AL DMTOCI9STOMER SERVTCE LBES GROWT51 3EASRPLG 18,019 SYSTEMS OVENIMS- RESIDENML SYSTTIJ-WIDE REPLACE len REPLACEBERVICELMP3 DNFRASTRUCIUlo 3FSTChD.o 313,A6 IINSTALLATN OFPWEAND COMbIRCW.d SYSTEM -WIDE SYSTTOMS NSION My ]ENANCFS-IISTALL PiD115lRML DUETOCUSTOMER SERI SEANCE LMES GROWTH 3ESTNEWG 2905,328 INSTALLATON OF PWEAND RESIDFNML SYSTEM -WIDE SY5IEMFXPANSION Feb APPURTENANCES. B95TALL COAfA@IMW. O13E'I000STOMER SERVICE LB9ER GROWTH 3FWNRPLG 563963 SYSTFMD.IMMLEM3- RESIDENTLLL SYSTEM -WIDE REPLACE J. REPLACESMFRVICELMF$ INFRASBAC 3FWSRPLO "9,106 SYSiAN I9FSIDENFW, SYSTAI-WIDE REPLACE lm SMOVEARTf3- REPLACESERVICELMES INFRASTINCNRP 30PRRPLG 1",131 RYSTFMAIPROVEMLNTS- RESIDENTIAL SYSTEM -WIDE REPLACE J. REPLACESERNCELMES WFMS GNAG 1,826 NSTALLATON OFI CW.d YTEM-WIDE EANSJON My AIIANE-INSTAL INDUSU DMTQCTOM SERVICE LI9FS 3GRNNEWG 69,695 INSTALLATION OF PPEAND sld SYSTEM -T SYEXPANSION lm APPURTENANCES-IiSTALL CO IM4RCIAL DUE ETO TOCUSTOMER SERVICE LINES GROWTH 30RNRPLG 60,531 S EMENIS- RESIDEN'ML SYSIETd-WIDE REPLACE J. LAM SMVI REPLACESERVICELWES DhRASIRUCIURE Page 98 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DPASION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 99 of 155 D UN OF COWUUO DAMP = PROJECTS PLACED N GAS p DpR,ppY PROJECT UTILRYPLANiw Sm"V OR CUSTOMERS PLANTA NDASBER COST RETFREDDU G2003 BENEFTRN L nON PURPOSEOFPROJECT SERN6 3I¢ "LG 36,680 SYSTEM IMPROVEMENB- RESmENTIAL SYSTEM-WDJE REPLACE Im REPL MMRNCELDIFS INFRASTRuCIiRtE 31RV W 100,824 SYS]EM IMPROVEMEMS- RESDJENIW. SYSTEJA-W E REPLACE J. ftEPLACESERNCEES INFRASTRII 3KERCMLG 10,496 INSTAUATION PTE OF PDAND COA.MptCIALd SYS TQA-WDJE %O SYSTEMERPANMON Mar APPBDtTIIJANCES-wSTALL INDUSTRIAL DUE TONSTOhh1ER SEC S O JWG 115,813 wSTAnOA SYM-mE SYMMANSON J. APPIIRTENANCE9-INSTALL COAAfEQC1AL DUE TONRTOhfflt SERVICE LINES I GROWTH 3KERRPLG 87,p9 SYSTEM PffROVFI.IENTS- vccmENn•r SYSTEM-WmE REPLACE !m REPIACESERNCELINFS wFRASTRI 3LGVCN9.G B,d34 wSTALWTION OF PBPEAND COMhO]tCW.STEM-WDJE d SY hNSIE SYSTFME%PANSION Mar APPBpTENANCES-wSIALL INDUSiR1AL DIIETON8TOb1ER SERVICE Ln GROWTH 3LGVNEWG 33,284 ON INSTALLATION OF PIPEANO RESmENT & SYSTEM -WIDE SYSTFAIERPANSION fm APPIIRTENANCFS-wSTALL COMAffRCW. DUE TOCUSTOMER SERVICE LINES GROWTH 3LGVRPLG 6,388 SYSiFM ni EbffISf3- vicem6NTW. SYSTEM-WmE REPLACE Im REPLACESERNCELDIFS DD'RASfRUCNRE 3LODALLC 1,)663]1 STORES WAREHOUSE LOADING- ALL NSTOMFAS SYSTEM -WIDE ADRISTOVERIiEAD IJm ADIUs2 CAP UAL MATERIAL RATE LOADING 3 Mk T61LSC ],986,033 STST ALL CUSI'OhD2tS SYSTEM -WINE SYSTEMEEPAN310N fm SEUROV56OTTT3- PURCHASE GASMEIERS DUE IO CUSTOLIFA 3MSQRPLO 2/7391 SYSTEM P@ ROVEMFNTS- RE4mENn•r SYSTEM-WDJE REPLACE Im REPLACE SERVILE LINES INFMSTR 3PARCMLO 2384 DJSTALLAtI= PIPEAND COMMElBCW.t STSTIIA-WIDE MSTO SYSTFME%PANSION My APPIIRTENAN(FS-=ALL DIDUSmrer a11E TOCIJSTIX.4]i SERNCELwE3 GROWTH 3PARNEWO 36.261 INSTALLATION � PIPEAFRJ RESIDENIIALt STSfEM-WIDE SYSTFME%PANSION Jm APPIIRiENANCES-INSTALL CObAO:RCW. DllETOOUSTOVD]t SERNCE LINES 3PARRPLa 43,20STSTFM ROVE69FNr5- RESD3ENNAL SYSTEM -WIDE RMACE REPLACE Im REPLACESESERVICELINES DJFRASTRU 3PLARPLG 331,621 SYSTPM IMPROVEAfENT3- AESmENTIAL SYSTEM-WDJE REPLACE lm REPf.ACE SERVICE LINES INFRA3TR 3REGULTG 1,929,t30 SYRTFM VEbffNTS- RESD3ENT SYSTEM -WIDE SO STSTEMERPANSION lu PURCHASE EGASOAS REGULATORS COLAffRC1AL DUETOCUS"%O 3RRKC6ILG 4],061 INSTALLATION OF PIPEAND CObihffRCW.d SYSTEM-WmE SYS]EMERPANStON My APPURTENANCES -INSTALL INDUSTRNL DUE TOOUSTOMER $ENC LINE4 GROWTH 3RRR]JEWG 1,822336 INSTSTALLATION OFP S RESIDENO & STSTETd-WIDE SYSTEMERPANMON J. APPURTENANCES-INSTSTALL COMMERCIAL DUE TOCUSTOM1fER SERNCELwPS GROWTH JRRKRPLG 33133 SYRTFMIMPROVEMEMS- RESD)EN'INL SYSTIId-WIDE REPLACE J. REPI.ACESERNOELINES INFRASTRUCNRE 3SANCbR.G 7,933 INSTALLAHON OF E D COFMtERRCW-d SYSTEM -WIDE SYSTEMERPANSION Mar APPURTENANCES-INNSTSTALL INDUSTRIAL DUE TOOUSTOM1IDt SERNCELDiE4 GROWTH 35ANNEWG 60,426 INSTALLATION OF RESIDENTIALd SYSTEM -WIDE SYSTEMERPANSION lm NSTA L APPURTENANCES - INSTALL CObIMF2tCW. DUE TOOUST� SERNCEMRO GROWTH 35ANRPLO 180,3]3 S RESPJEMIAI. SYSTEM -WIDE REPLACE lm LAT S1PROVEMEM3- REPLACE SERNOF RDTUSTRU"STO 33WECMLG 312 INSTALLATION OF PM D COhAfERCLLLt SYSTAI-WIDE SYSTEMEXPANSION Sep APPURTENANCES -INSTALL WSTE INDUSTRV.L DUE TOOUSTOb1ER SERNCELINES GROWM 3SWENEWG 4,903 AIION OFPIPTA RESID SYSTIIAW[DE SYSTEMEItPANSION Feb APPURTENANCES-DISTALL "PUR CML COMbffRCW. DUE TOOUSTOhffR SERNCEL GROWTH 3SWERPLO 31,]61 SYRTFM0.4ROROVEI.ON RESD)ENIIAL SYSTEM-WmE REPLACE J. REST A ERNOLwES DBRASN[UCTURE 3TEMC640 ],0]6 LA w3TALLATION OFF PPTA COSII.ffRCW.d SYSTEM -WIDE SYSTEMEXPANSION Mm DIDUSIRW. DUElOCT1RTOhIDI SPP CFIIANCE3-INSTALL SER GROWTH 3TEb9JEWG 9;30] ALLAUOS wRTALLATION OFP RESmENTLU.d SYSTEM -WIDE STSTFMF3OANSION J. APPURTENANCES -INSTALL SME 101A aUE TOOUSTOFIDt SERNCELINES I GROWM Page 99 of 155 • C1 J ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 1Da of 155 D�ON OF COb1PLE PROJSCISPLACED W GAS ATEPWCED DGA6UTD.ITY PRO]ECT UTOISYPLANTWSSRVICEOR CUSTOf�6RS NUMIIER COST RETDIF.DDNIWG30D3 6838EFREDLOCATION PORPOSEOFPROJECT PLANTW SERVICE 3TE 0 165,075 SYSTEMD.iPROVFMENTS- RESIDENILLL SYST -WIDE REPLACE lm REPLACESERVICELWES WFRASI )TFRCRII.G 6,503 INSTALLATION OF P@EAND CObI.mtCW,@ SYSTEM -WIDE SYSI3A5 EXPANSION MMM AP APPURTENANCES -INSTALL DIDusT DUETOCUSTObffR SERVICELINES GROWTH 3TERNEWG 31D,013 WSTALLATION OF PIPE AND RESIDENTW.B STSTIIA-WIDE SYSTEMEX MMUN Jm 'TENANCES-NSTALL CIX.QIffItCW. DUETOMSTOb SERVICE LOffS GROWFN 3TFRRPLD 71,539 SYSTEMI.IPROVEMENTS. RESmEN'fIAL SYSTEM -WIDE REPLACE lm REPLACESERVICELWES QiFRASTRUCIIIRE 3TFXCMLG 9,893 MTALLAMONOFP4'EAND CDMMERCW & SYSTEM -WIDE SYS EXPANSION Mar APPURTENANCES-NSTALL WDUsTR1AL DUETDCUSTOb SERVICELWES I GROWTH 3fE]@IEWG 188,680 WSTALLATIONOFPIPEAND RESmENT/AL@ SYSTEM -WIDE SYSTFMFX "MON J. APPURTENANCES -INSTALL COMb1ERCW. DUETOCUSNMER SERVICE LWES GROWTH 3TEJWPLG 331.M5 SYSTW WROVEM1ffNTS. RESIDENTIAL SYSTEM -WIDE REPLACE J. REPLACE SERVICE LWE9 WFRASSINCIURE 3WAC a 3.M WSTALLATIDNOFPIPEAND COAAfERCW.@ SYSTEMWIDE SYsTEMEXPANSION Mar APPURTENANCES -INSTALL DIDUSTRL9L DU MMSTOI.¢R SERVICE LWES GROWTH 3WACNEWG 77,016 WSTALLATIONOFPIPEAND RFSIDENML@ SYSTEMWIDE SYSTEM F33AN W Im APPURTENANCES -INSTALL CONI.DR DUETOCUSCOMER SERVICE LW GROWTH 3WACRPLG 408,932 SYSIFMD.iPROVEMEMS. RFSIDENTLLL SYSFFM-WIDE REPLACE J. REPLACE SERVICE LWES INPRASDtUCIURE 3WAXCMLG 8,539 NSTALLATIONOFPIPEAND COb9fERGAL@ SYSTEM -WIDE SYSTFMEXPANSION Apr APPURTENANCES.WSTALL ImusTRW. DMTOCUSTONIER SERVICE LINES GROWTH 3WAXNEWG 109,413 WSTALLATIDNOFP@E RESIDEISIIALB sYSTEM-WIDE syS EXPANSION Im APPURTENANCES -INSTALL CObI.fERCW. DUE TOCUSTOMER SERVICELII GROWHi 3WAXRPLG Im,3W SYSTPMIMPROVEMENT$- RFSmENEAL SYSTEM -WIDE REPLACE J. REPLACE SERVICE LWES WFRASIItUCI'URE 3WFSChD.G 7.265 NSTALLATIDNOFMEAND COND.fERCIAI.@ SYSTEM -WIDE SYSSFMEXPA MON Mu APPURTENANCES-MTALL WDuSTRTAL DMTOCUSTO SEANCE LWES GROWTH 3WFSNEWG 101,913 WSTALIATIONOFPPEAND RESIDENML@ SYSTEM -WIDE sY3TFM EXPANSION lm APPURTENANCES -INSTALL COMbiFJICIAL DUE TO CUSTObIDt SERVICELWES GROWTH 3WPSRPLO 333j10 sYSTAaSMVIFLNi5- RESmENI1AL SYSTEM-WmE RPPLACE J. REPLACE ES WERASTRUCI'URE 3WSTCM1D.O 400jM MONOF M WSTALLATION OF PIPEAND COMNIFRCW.@ SYSTEM -WIDE sY3TEMEXPANSION My APPURTENANCES. WSTALL INDUSTRIAL DUETOCUSiOMER SERVICE LWES GROWTH 3WSTNEWG 6,763,313 WSTALLAIION OF PBE AND RESIDEN[LV.@ SYSTEM -WIDE SYSTIId EXPANSION Rb APPURTENANCES-WSTALL LYJbD.IbIlCIAL DIIETOCUSTDh¢R SERVICE LMS GROWTH Page 1Da of 155 • 0 • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TIX DMSION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 101 of 155 DE CR ONOFCOMP FRO11M PLACED MGRS DATE PLfCFD w chs mR1Tr' PROTECT SEANCE OR UTGBETW CUSTOMERS PLA CO3T RETIRED DURw D BENEFLR:D LOCATION P1IRPOSEOF PROTECT SEANCE RYANA BRTANACI 15,635 S- PROPERTY B.flRODMONTS- ALLCUSTOMERS BRYANSERNCE BUBAwQ/LAIm 1W ROOUA CENTER D�ffNnN Eno BRYGENAT 3,030 DECONDIl10NDJG TOOLS ANDEQl11P ALG CUSTObffRS SYSTEM-WR1E FOR DISIALLATION, Ap TORE PURCHASE GENERATOR FOROA$ MAINTENANCE, AND CREWS RPP OFFACR. BRYPRELT 15,886 PROPERTY 5570N2.EM3- ALLCUSTOMFRS BRYANSERNCE BIBLDwGD.AtID Feb INSTALL NEW PARRINO LOT CENTER D.iPROYFD@TTS SURFACEFORSERNCECENTER BRYTAEEQ 3.309 TOOLSANDEQIIIPbffFTT- ALL CUSTOMERS SYSTBbS-WD3E FOKINU LATION, Fd PURCHASETAMP O MAITTENANCE,AND 11@AffNi' REPAIR OF FACB.I ES COPPIFLE 3,758 SYSTEM B.iPRONMENIS- ALL CUSTOMERS SYSTEM -WIDE IISTALLATTON OF Feb wSTA1LTFI.EMETERwG METERTELEMETRY FORNTELE 15,032 SYSTFMAEROYEb s- ALL CUSTObIR3 SYSIPM-WIDE INSTALLATION OF Fd INSTALL TFLEMET o METERTELEMETRY FRANCONS 18,89'1 FRANCHISES AND CONSENTS SUB ALL CUSTOMERS SYSTEM -WIDE FRANCIDSESANO ha ACCOUNT 1010020 CONSENTS GRNEL5C1 4.156 TDOLSANOEQUGT@NT- ALL CUSTOMERS SYSh -WIDE FOR D45TALLAMON, Feb PURCRASEELECTROFUSION MAINTENANCE,AND REPAIR OF FACD.TIIES GRNPIERC 4,984 TOOLSANDEQLHPM - ALLCUSTOMERS SYSTEM -WIDE FORINSTALLATION Feb PURCHASEPNEUMATICPIERCUIG MATNT MANCE, AND TOOLS REPAIR OF FAMa RAUFTELE 11.319 SYSTFMDriPRONMENTB- ALLCUSTOMFRS SYSTEM-WDJE INSTALLATION OF Feb INSTALL TELEMETERIIG METERTELFMEIRY 1TEENEFl�S 29W RE MOPE WWGHTS- ALL CUSfOAERS RFEI'J: PURCHASEEASFAEM Nw PURCHASEOFEASEA4NT MGM REREI.ECT 4,956 TOOLSANDEQII@bffiNT- ALL CUSTOb SYSTEM -WIDE FORD4STALLATION, MR PURCHASEFI.ECIROFUSION MAINFQNANCE,AND PROCESSOR REPAIROFFACG.iTIE3 K FIFLO 1,2M TOOLSANDEQUGMENI- ALL CUSTOb SYST -WIDE FORWSIALLATION, Ap PURCHASEP@01CCATORS MAINTENANCE, AND REPAIROF FACD.IIIF_S LABBENFT (49,659) STORE9WAREHOUSELOADB40- ALL NSTObffRS SYSTEM -WIDE A USTON1UfrAD J. A Un CONSTRUCITON LOADING OYERHEADRATES LNGPR c 2,626 TOOLSANOEQU@bENF- ALL CUSTOMERS SYSTEM -WIDE FORWSTALLATION, AV PURCHASEFMLOCATOR MAIRFNANCE,AND REPAIR OF FACRITES M ACEH 563.321 TOOLSANDEQMb - ALL CUSTOMERS SYSTEM -WIDE FORwSTALLATION, Dec PURCNASE29BACENOES MAIMFNANCE, AND REPAIROF FACB.1Tf64 METIDJETC 26,131 TOOLSANDEQMPIR - ALL CUSTOMERS SYSTEM -WIDE FORwSTALLATION. My SE O1mC METHANE MAINTENANCE, ANO DETECTOR RITA OFFACG.ITIFS MEOLT330 7,106 SYSTEM D.IRONNEmS- ALL CUSTOMERS SYSTPM-WIDE PRESSUREMONOT RING Mer WsTALLPRES3UREO0NTROL MEII4DOhfT 10,006 SYSTEM D,IRONMMBNTS- ALL CUSTOb1ER5 SYSIIIA-WDJE FDIDNEEOS Mu PURCHASERADIOSERNCE MONROR MTRCTOOL 33,042 TOOLSANDEQII@bENT- ALL CUSTOMERS SYSTEM -WIDE FORINnA ATION, My PURCHASE SOLAR bffSSAGE MAINTETIANCE, AND BOARDS.OMLOTMEMB REPAIROFFAM= ICVTIFRSAHDSQUMETOOLS PARELECT 4,956 TOOLSANDEQURTffNT- ALL CUSTObID45 SYSTEM -WIDE FORWSTALLATTON, Mry FURCNASEELECIROFUSION MAIRFNANCE,AND PROCESSOR REPAIR OF FAMMS FARSADTL 2}26 TOOLSANDEQUWF - ALLNSTOMERS SYSTEM -WIDE FORINSTAL MON, Mer PURCHASESADDLEASSISTTOOL MATMFNANCE,AND REPAIR OF FACRTOFS POLNSYC T;IN SYS I.iFROVEhffM'S- ALL CUSTOMERS SYSTEM -WIDE REPLACE len REPLACE SERNCEtWFS wFMSTRUCNRE RRRBCEOT 4,276 PROPERTYD ON?LENIS- ALL CUSTOMERS ROUND ROCK BUG.DwGD.AFID Mar REPLACE GATE SMwm D.IRROYEbffMS RRKGENRT 2,030 TOOLSANDEQUIRMENT- ALL CUSTOMERS SY$TFM-WIDE FOR INSTALLATION, Mu FURCHASEGENPRATORFORGAS MAINTENANCE, AND CREWS REPAIROFFACDITIES Page 101 of 155 0 • 11 ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 TOTAL ]8p)1144 ADDFOONS FOR 2003 Page 102 of 155 DESCRIPTION OF COW D PROSECTS PLACED IN GAS DATE PLfCCD m PROXWF UiD.1IYPL FINSERVICEOR CUSTO)WERS O4GAS II NUMBER COSI' RETIRED DOPING 2003 BENEFITED LOCATION PURPOSE OF PROSECT PERMIT SERVICE RRKSROOF 69,250 PROPERTYa OVFMEM3- ALLNSTOMERS ROONOROCK BUNDWGrT.NND Btu REPLACEROOF SERVICE WROVQ.ffNIS RRK O 4,353 SYSTEM WROVID.fEM3- ALLCUSFQAPRAffiRS SYSFFIA-WD7E PURL MOFNaTFR Nov PURCHASETELEMEFRY TELEMETRY SANAN003 3,042 PROPERTY aPROVEANNFS- ALL CUSFOhffR3 SANANGELO BUNDDN� My REMODEL OFFICE OFFICE a OVEMENTS SANDBLST $828 TOOLSANDEQUPB - ALL NSTOB SYSTEMWIDE FOR O25TALLATION, Mu PURCHASE)ANDBLAS OAND BfADPf MCE,AND BREATHTNGE UPBPNF REP OFFACa1TPS SHFRICFM 3,026 PR.P YDUPROVEMEMS- ALLNSTOBffAS SHERMAN BUMDNQOAND Mer PURCHASEiCE MACHINE SERVICE IMPROVEMENT) MOREQUP 214,989 TOOLSANDEQUIPo4ENF- ALL NSTOBPRS SYSTEM -WIDE FOR MTALLATTON, Btu PURCBASESHOROIGEQUD'B1ENf MAINFEtUNCE AND REPADNOFF SWELEDG 2,801 TOOLSANDE UPMEM- Q ALL CUSTOMER) SYSTEM -WIDE FOR INSTALLATION, no,,S Mry PURCHASEELECiRp£USION IG MFO NCEAND OF REPRWST A SWFOLYSQ 2,68 TNLSAND EQSTIC M- ALL CUSTOMER) SYSTEM -WIDE FOR ON3TALLATIOD CONS My PURCHASE PLASTIC PPE SQUEEZE MAINZ QAND TOOLS OFFA ftEPR OF FACaRNNS TEMELECT 4,956 TNLSANDEQUPOFUSI ALL NSrONDA3 SYSTEM -WIDE FOR D48FALLATION, May CHASEFlECFRO FUSION MPMROFAINCE,AND UPMEM REPAIRFACn TEMOENIR 2,030 S ALLQISTOB4R.5 SYSTQd-WD)E ST FOR INSTALL ON. Apr SDEQ TORETQOO�- PUR PURCHASE OENFRATOR FOR OAS -R MAIMENANCEAND CREWS REPJUROFFA MC 22W PROPERTNPRMS- AL Bmuw--a Mer RNONDG SRVC NFROM TPLUGT 3,93 TNLSANDEQUWN- ALL CUSTOMERS SYSTEM -WIDE FOR DNSFALLMD Mu PURCHASEPLUGGING TOOLS MFIN NCF,AND OF REPADIOFFACa1TNS IID(ACREP 17,251 PROPERTYIDPROVEMOT AIL N3TOMER3 Ssmwm BUNDINOaAND Nov Rif. O SERVICE DPROV TEXFI.ECI' 4,956 SC EQUNOFIIONMG AND EQUPOFUSI ALL CUSTOMERS SYSTEM -WIDE AMO FOR NSTALLATMD May FUR FURCIIASEFS,ECFRO NSION BOX MAIN ,AND WIOLSANDPS OFFA REPRWST TEBPAVBK 1,539 TOOLSANDEQUPB ALL N5FOFPA3 SY3TEAf-WIDE FOR INSTALLATION, UMON.S Mar PURCHASE PAVEhffNFO� B MINNL$AND REPADt OF OFFACaRPS TEXFELFM 22,708 SYSTEM aPROVEMEM3- ALL CUSTOMERS SYSFPM-WIDE PURCHASE OF METER Mu PNtCHASETEI,EMETRY FFLEEOF TRNSPROV 58,253 SF PPROVEMEM3- ALL CUSTOMER$ SYSTEM -WIDE PURCHASE OF B4-1'FA Dcc PURCHASE BIETFR )RANSFER TRANSFERPROVEPS PROVER) WACFSWKS 1,249 PROPERTY IMPROVEBIEM3- ALL CUSTOMERS WAN BIIaDDNGhAND Mu DISTALL EFMD SERVICE WORK ARTA aPROVpIffM3 WACSQINL 7j59 TOOLSAN NNT- ALL CIISIOBN:RS 3YSTEBI-WIDE PoR DNSFALLATION, Mu PURCHASEPUSTICPIASTIC PPESQUEEFP MALT EAND TNLS OFFA REPAINST F WFSFELEC M,868 TNLS AND EQZFROFST- ALL NSTO88EIN5 SYSTEM -WIDE MOFI. FOR DN3TALLATION, My FI2RCHASEELECTROFUSION MACE ,AND E UIPM14M REPRMST F F WESTBOSS 10,8)3 TUOLSANDEQUPMINT- ALL N3tt3MPRS SYSTEM -WIDE LCD.ITNS FOR INSTALLATION, Mer nmctusEBlssaEs MAIIJIFNANCE,AND REPAIROFFACaT12E3 WFALLSAC 36$95 PROPERTY OPROVEBiEMS- ALL CUSIOM1NHS WICMTA FALL$ BU DDNOh May REPLACE AIR CONDMONR40 SERVICE PPROVEBPNIS WFRADIOE 4,201 SYSTEM IBPROVEMEMS- ALLNSFOMERS SYSTEM -WIDE F.DN Mu PURCHASERADIOE UPI-PNr TOTAL ]8p)1144 ADDFOONS FOR 2003 Page 102 of 155 rL 4 ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DMSION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 00000632 ]96.330 F ALL SYSTEM -I E REDAE PROPERTY PHOlELTS PLA W GASll'SD.pY CUSTOMERS PAO.IEC! (1,196) PLAMW S6RWYICEOR REiptED CUSTOMERS DALLAS v ATRASTRUCIVRE NUMBER COST DUBWC ilei BENEPPPFD LOCATION PURPOSE OF PRO.IF.CP 00000632 ]96.330 ALL SYSTEM -I E REDAE PROPERTY OFCALLCENTER CUSTOMERS 00000655 (1,196) �TOFFACB.TTf69-REPRE ALL DALLAS v ATRASTRUCIVRE WFRASTRUCIIRtE CUSmM 00000655 (6)9) RBTOiEL1EM OF FACMP-RESIRE ALL SAN MGELO REFIRE D]FMSIAUC WFRASTRUCIURE CUSroMERS 00000655 (529) REMtEb1FN1'OF FAW.R�S-REPOtE ALL ABIlEI� RLT]RE UBFRASIRUCNRE WFM$TRUC CUSTOMERS M00655 (403) REIWFI.fE1ITOFFACOATM-REPIXE ALL CISCO urnrtc WFRgSTRUCNRE DDRAsrnucnmE cusTOAmu 00000655 (371) RBTIRH.D]PTOFFACIlITIR9-cx-rmv ALL THROCKMORT REfIltE DRRASTRUCI'URE WFEASTRUC CUSTOMER$ ON 00000655 (m) RETDUMEVPOFFACIlITIFS-REPIXE ALL SAVOY REIUtE WFRASTRuC WFRASTRUCTURE CUSTOMERS 00000655 (62) REfIRES4 aFAM=-BENE ALL TREM REHRE WFRASTRUCPURE INFRASRIuC CUSmM 00000655 (3) PFTIREb¢NTOFFAWITM-REITRE ALL COLLEGE REfIXE WFRASTRUCTURE WFRASTRDCTDRE CUSTOMERS STATION 00000683 (25,975) RETIRA4N[ASSOCIAITD WITH ALL $YSFEM-V E UPDATE PRESSURE MISCELLANEOUS-UPDATEPRE4SI]RE CUSFOMERS MOMF o CO OLMOMTORWGFROMmoO OOOOW91 (58,638) REDRENIDV'PASSOCIAlEDNTSH ALL SYSTEM -W E UPDAMMONESYST US-UPDATEPHONE CU%POMER-9 SYSTEM OW00695 (21,585) REf'BtESffiBI ASSOCMTEO WRH SALE ALL ABIlENE REORE PROPERTY OF REMEDLANDAM)BUIlDWG CUSTOMERS 0000047 (116,108) REMFA¢Nf A$SOCNIIDWPPH ALL LWAN BWLDWOILAM3 PROPFRTYB.iPROVEMEMR- CUSPOMERS SPREE! U.BROVEMEN]$ REPLACEA@CONDNIONWG UNR FACIlITY 00000]48 (?D,000) NTMI ALL LOOAN BUIlDWGhAND oM T]IITAS$OCIATED m PROPERTYBAPROVEMEN]S- CUSTOMERS $TREE! 1MPR0VFMENIS REPLACE RODE FACIlRY 00000]49 (H.331) RE'IIXELfflO'ASSOCIA[ID WITH ALL BUBAWGhAND PROPERTYDdPAOVSYE NSTOMER$ SW STREEP llHPROVHNEN'IS REPLACE SECUsH FACRITY 00000]51 (39}1� TIM WHH ALL GARLAND BUIlDWGMND mopm.OWTASSOCMTED PROPERN U4ROVEMENlS- NSroMER3 SERVICE I iMPR0VES4M5 00000752 (18,241) RETIXEM14iJTASSOCIAIED W[PH ALL LOGAN BUIlDWGR.ANO PROPERTYB.IPAOVFAT CUSroMF3LS SFREEP EdPRDVEMENIS REPLACE PARK W G LOT FACB.ITY 00000]55 (IAn) RETMES4]iT A3SOCIAT®WI'1}I SALE pLt LAAPASA$ REfIXE PROPERTY OF LOT CUSFOMERS OOOW]62 (400) REI]RFA¢Ni AS50C1A'IEO WITH ALL SANANGELO BU INGh WSTALLATIONOFSIGNAGE NSIOMEA.4 SERVICE CENTER D.iPROVEMENT3 00000813 (3.389) RENtES1ENTAS3pCIATED WIiH ALL SYSTEM-WO)E FORIMCE, ATION. 1U0L4 ATID EQU@AffNT-PURCHASE NSTOMERS MAWIEIANCE,AM)REP HORITAMAL BORWG MACH WE OF PACB. 000008]5 (I,IM) RETIXESIEEQIMCIA'I-P ALL PJ n FOR WSTALLATION, TOOLS AND EQIIO'AAS PURCHASE CUSTOMERS DISTIUCP MAINIENANCEAM3REP GENERATOR$PORGAS CREWS OF FACR.FOES OOOOOMO (10,000) REIWET:ETRASSOCIATEDWITH ALL ABIlENE BURDWG PROPERTYBdPROVEhffNTS- CUSPOMERS SERVICE O@ROVEM1tEIV I'5 REPLACE ROOF CENTER 00000831 (10,000) WFIfI ALL HEBREL BUIlDWG PROs WNTAS30CIATEO PROPERTYINIPROVEMFNIS- CUSTOMERS GAS OFFlCE D.BROVEM1ffIJ'1'$ s REPLACEROOF Page 103 of 155 Cl r -IL • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 104 of 155 DOilwcowum FROJEC-JS PTACED IN GAS UJ1T.3TY PROJECT PL WSERVINORRETIRF.a NSFOBfER.S I NUBIBER COST DUNMGM0 BENEFJTED LOCATION PURPOSEOFFROJECT 00000839 (]N) RETBtEt E-tENNT ASSOCIATED WITH AL1. I DLSTIUCF FORASTALLADON, TOOLSANOEQIHPB -PURCHASE CUSTOMERS MAINE "CF�ANDREP GENERATORFORGASCREWs OF FAM= OOOWN3 (5.000) REIINFt.@I.T ASSOCIATED WITH ALL LOG" BU I)114GBAND PROPERNo�OVEMENIS- CUSTOMERS STREET IMPROVEEfENTs REPLANROOF FAC11]T- 00000855 (1,114) RElMEN1E8FFAS9OCIAmID ALL LOG" SMDING/LAND FROFERTYWROVEFDNTs- CUSTOMERS STREJJT B OVEMFNTS DEM FAC 0000859 (313) mS A WGTON RUH.DB AND PROPERTYB.IPROVFMENFS- CUSTOMERS MRVIN IPAPROVEA¢MS REPLACEAIR CONOmONDor CENTER OWW910 (1,000) RLTRFSIENT ASSOCIAIPD WITH ALL aRE M.LEEI LE BULLDwW.ATID REPLACEMEM OF ABi NNDmO18NG IIMIS NSTOMERS SERVIN CET9TER O@ROVEMENIS O0O00931 (I200) �ARSOCIATPlm ALL SFDRA4AN PRESSUREMONITORWa REPLACEMFT PRESSURE NSroMERs SERVICE 00000936 (l.2W) REfRLEFffNTAS5OCIAlIDWITH ALL IRVP'G BUB.DB9G/LAFID ROOEREPLACEIdFM CUSroh61(S SERVICE CEMER D.BROVEM.EMS OOW09i1 (5,888) REf]REMENFA59OCIATEDWm3ALL Bt BUBA69GO.A3m ROOF REPLACEMENT N51'OMERS SERVICE B.iPROVETffNTs OOWW35 (15.216) LOOM RPERTYBi4FEIO NroM SR AHUfPR0WVIT4NIID PACSUSYSEM F 0W36 (17,0) MASOLIAM%mI FORTWORH BMDMM + PROPERiTRDROM- NSroMR ERVC wltt)R5 OW00968 OO>)RE562H.fENT ASSOOAOnAnHSALE ALL GRANBIIRY REFIXE PROPERTY OF REFIRED8fEA5URING SIATTON NSroMERS S TE WOOD9]8 (til) RFfetEh4llPASW ALL FORT WORTH REDRE PROPERTY STATION=ALH OF REIiRID VALVE STATION SFIE NSroMERS OOOW983 (3.248) RETBiEMENFA55OCIATEDWmI ALL IRVBiG BUB.OBJGM PROPERTYOIPROVEMENTS- CUSTOhDR.4 SERVICE B.DROVPb1PNTS REl'LANABtMN DENIER 00000984 (3.201) T!R9CUNR AEIIltEL>EN2ASSOCIATEDWmi ALL DEMON BITB.DTNGMND PROPFRTYPffROVEMENFS- CUSTOMERS SERVICE UffROVEMENTS O000987 (49Z) REFR1E81E.N'FASSOCIATID W3THSALE ALL DALLAS REURE PROPERTY OF REFBtFD MEASURDIGSFATION NSroMERS 00000991 (51,550) ASSOCIATEDWmiSALE ALL FORT WORTH RESDtE PROPERTY OF 2 VA1FM OFl VACANT LOTS NSTOhIDts 00000998 (1,038)REFB3FS4NIASSO WITH ALL LAMPASAS REIHtE PROPERTY LUTED FENCE ON REFRIED LOT NSroMER$ 0096000/ (L000) RF,HREAfft9TAS3OCIATEDWm3FAX ALL BRYANHUB OFFICE EQIBPBfENT MACHDB? NsmM OFFICE 00961831 (n.M) RETDRENDNT ASSOCIATED Wm3 ALL GRAPEVDB: REPIAN RELOCAIIONOFDISTR®OITON CUSTOMERS D TluC FACBJTffS OW71519 (40.1]0) RFJB8R81QTFASSOCIATEDWm1 ALL FORTWORIN REPLAN RETACATIONOFDISTRIBVIION NsmO A'FRASReUC FACB.TTD,S (WW4379 (5,360) RETREMEItTASSOCIATm WmI ALL DALLAS RFLOCATEFAN.mESDUB RELOCADONOFDISIRBIUTiON CU$'FO81FA3 TOaOVPRFRIEN FACB.R6_S 009]4353 (SIA51) RLTBtET+63TFA55OQAlm Wml ALL DALLAS RELOCATION OF FAMITES RELOCATIONOFOLSTRBNTION NSFOMIM DUETOOOVERNMFATAL FAMO71M REQMT W01470 (1,116) PEIRIB.BRlFASSOCI m%llli ALL AB6 FOR BISTALLATION, PURCHASEOFGENERATORWELDER NSTOMERS DISDUCF MADRENAN ANO REP 00981175 (293.267) REIIXETffNFA35OC1ATID WmR ALL DALLAS RELOCATIONTOAVOM RELOCATIONOFDISTItIB=ON CUSTOMERS RELOCATIONTOAVOID AMITIEB CONFLICT WTIH CITY PAVDICFIF 3 Page 104 of 155 • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 105 of 155 D ON OF LETED la=Pr ENGAS UOLITY PROTEGE PIAN'F DI SERVICE OR RETIRED CII6TOaffm NUMBER COAT DURIiG 100) BRNEFITED IACATION PURPOSEOFPROJECF 0098111 (7.067) REFIXEIr1ENNTASSOCIATEDWITH ALL DALLAS RELOCATIONTOAVOD RF3gCATIONOFDISTREBUOON CUSTOAD]15 CONPLILTWITH I FACRRIES CONSTRUCOMOF 00981199 (RM3) ASSOCIATED WITH ALL DALLAS RELOCATEFAC6IIIESDIIE RELOCATION OF DI97RE3UTION CUSTOMERS TOGOVETODRN FACRITIF.S REOIJESF 00951509 (15,48) REIBiEM1ffNTASSOCIATR)W ALL ARLIiGTON RELOCATEFACD-FFff.BDUE TIONOFDISIRIBUIION CUSTOMERS TOGOVFREBffii ACI1Tff4 REQUEST 00981511 (141,01) RETHtF].4NT ASSOCIATED AM ALL AR 17014 RELOCATEFACRFOESDUE RE1.0 ATIONOFDISTRDIITION CUSTOMERS TD GOVBRMAEEFFAL ACRLOE.S REQUESF man" (30,81) REIIIBEA4NTASSOCIATEDWTIH ALL LEWISVBLE RELOCATIONTOAVOD RELOCATION OF DISTRIBUTION CIISTOMERS CONFl.ICT WHH CITY 00953697 (19409) RETUREAORASSO 17DW1OI ALL ➢ALLAS REPLACE RELOCATION OF➢ISTR®UIION CUSTOMERS DhRASTRUCIURB 009839" (1037) RETIXEI.BBJEASSOCIATEDWTEEI ALL GARLAND REPLACE RELOCATION OF DISIMBUTION CUSTOMERS DTFRASTRUCNRE 00983911 (11930) REfItEA¢NTASSOCIATEDWITN ALL MESQURE REPLACE RELOCATION OF DISTR®UIION CUSTOMERS DDRtASTRUCI11R0 FACT ITR3 00981Tl8 (w) R£fIBMEWTASSOMTEOWIl11 ALL SAN ANGELO FORD23TALLARON, PURCHASE OF HYDRAULIC FACER CUSTOMER5 OFFICE MAINIElIANCE, AND REP OF FAC6ITffS 0098809) (1,516) REI'DBEAff1l1'ASSOCIATFD WFIH ALL BROW 001) REPLACE R®.00ATION OF DISTR®UIION CUSIOFME S DIEM IX7LJRE 00989333 (4,820 RETIXFbffNFASSOCIATEDW ALL FORTWORIH REPLACE RFLOGTTON OF DISTR®UTION CUSTOMERS IIFRASTRUCNRE FACO mcc 00989349 (7.432) RE1NQrffNEASSOCIATFDWIIH ALL PLANO REPLACE RFS.00ATION OF DISIR®MON CUSTOAffRS WFMSTRUCIl1RE FACRO MM361 (18,02) RFIR2EM1ffIJTAS50C1ATED WIFH ALL RENDON REPLACE RIlOCAt10NOF D6IR®UIION CUSIOMFFS O4FRASTRUCR3RE FACI.FIIES 00959450 (1.934) RETIREBffNTASSOCIATED WEIH ALL WICHITA REPLACE RELOCATIOHOFIHTlR®UPON CUSTOMERS FALLS WFRASIRUCNRE FAGRUIES OOOOSBSA (1,097) REIIRET.H3R ASSOCIAT®WITH ALL =OMA FOR INSTALLATION. PURCHASEOFGENERATOR CUSTOMERS DISTRICT MAINTENANCE, AND REP OF FACI.(ItE9 0000906.4 (1,091) RElIIt0.1FN'1' ASSOCIATED WITH ALL TERRELt FORBISFALLATION, TOOLSAN➢EQITOMENT-REPLACE CUSEOAIERS Mama MAINFENANCE,ANDREP GENERATORUSE➢BYGASC $ OF FACRITES 0000908A (1,IM) WITH ALL CLEBURIB FOR WSFALLAMON, TOOtzA EQI11PA0iNT-REPLACE CUSI'Oa ERS DISTRICT MAWEEIMCE,ATBDREP GENERAFORUSEOBYGASC S OF FACR= Page 105 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 106 of 155 ON OF C PROJECTS PWC DM GM UTILTSY PR08ECT PLANT M SERVICE OR RETRIED CUSTOMERS NU85EER COS[ O0 G2003 BENEFTFED LOCATION PURPOSE OF PRO2ECT OOON09A (12,000) RETO2EMENf ASSOCIATED WFM ALL SYSTEM -WIDE FOR Rini UTION. TOOISA EQURTffidF-REPLACE6 CUSTOMERS MAIMFNANCE,AND� ELECCROFUSIONTOOLS OF FAMOMS 0000911A (2.471) RE[QtEMQ1TASSOCIATED WFFR ALL HUNT STREET REP MGENERATORDUE REPLACEMENFOFGENFRATOR CUSTOMERS YARD- TOBUROLARYATTIE GARLAND FRMFSfRFbTYARDW 00009MA (803) REFIXEMENFASSO(RATEDWITH ALL GARLANDA FORMSTA ATION, PURL MOFTOOLSAND CUSTOMERS NOMSDUCFS MAMTQIAN ANDREP W111038 (15,961) REFMQ.tENTASSOCIATEDWHH ALL OAKLAND SYSTEM DAPROVE81FM8 MSTALLMOh URMG STATION CUSTOMERS AND REMOVMO MSTMG FACO.= MIQAWI (1.433) REFR(EEIH MSOCIA7LDWUR ALL LONOVMIV FORMSTALLATION, TOOLSAND EQUB'ME2IT-REPLACE CUSTOMERS OFFICE MAMTENANCE, AND REP GENERATORUSEDBYGASCRRWS OF FAC6TRF5 10838320 (2,973) RETIREB@TPASSOCIATEDWTTH ALL FLOWER REIAC FACRmvC DUE RELOC MWOFIMMUBUTTON CUSTOAfERS MWNID TOOOVERNME FAC]LITM RBQMT 1111MH0 (81,981) RE[MEM10ITASSIX;IATID WITH ALL COPPELL RELO MONTOAVOM RELOCATIONOFDLSIRIBUTION CUSTOMERS coN ICTWPMCITY FACR3 STRB MOR= 11261210 (9155) RETIXELffNTAS50C1AlID WTIH ALL A NGTON RELOCATEFACRATIPSDUE RELOCATIONOPDLSTUBUOON CUSTOMERS TOGOVFRM..ffN FACBATIM REQUEST 11289520 (5.589) RETRU=MEITTASSOCIATEDWOB ALL DALLAS RFLOCATBFACD3TiESDUE RELOCATIQIOFDISIRIBUDON CUSI'OL1EP.4 TO 00VERNLffiN FACR.= REQU 11317MG (5,963) REFIXEMQ.TA880CIATEDWDH ALL OARLATID RELOCATION TO AVOID RELOC UONOFDMTR®UDON MIMMERS LUNFLiLTMRIC(TY FACR3TIE$ STRESTPRORia 11333930 (39,371) EULFSS RELO MFACBIOFSDUE RELOCATIONOFDISTR®UTION CUSTOMERS TO OOVERNMENFAL FACB-ITIFS REQUEST 11361890 (21O ) RETIXFAiQiT ASSOCIATED WFFH ALL A RIOTON RFIACATIONTOAVOID RELOCATIONOFDISTR®UTION CUSTOMERS CONFl.ILT WITHCrtY FACR-R@S STREEFPROIECF 113T G (51186) REIWEMEFIFASSOCL3TED WFIB ALL ROCSWA RFIO MFACR.ITIESDUE RELOCATION OF DISTREB=N CUSTOMERS TO 00VERNME FACU3Tff8 REQUEST 11602180 (6.166) REI'RiE�ffN'FASSOCIATED WITH ALL RICHARDSON RELOCATEFACB.ITIESDUE RELOCATION OF DISTRIBUTION CUSIOMFRS TOOOVERTAffN FACB.ITIFS REQUEST 1IM1750 (63,901) RBFIR4.@lFASSO MAWH ALL DALLAS RELO MFACB]=DUE R60CATION OF DMTRIDUDON CUStt1MER5 TO GOVERNMENTAL FACRATIES REQUEST 11506110 (2.108) REIBtFABR9FAS50OATIDWITH ALL TEMPLE REPLACE RELOCATION OF DISTRIBUDON CUSTOMEA9 MFRASFRUCCUAE FACR ^n< Page 106 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TFJ( DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF HUNG PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 107 of 155 DESCR ON OF PROd MPWCEDINGASUTDITY PBO2ECF PLA WSERVICEORRETIRED MWOMER9 NUSD3ER COSF DD GLIM BENEFRED LOCATION PIIBPoSEOFPRO]ECF 11%1690 (15,051) RFTIXE6fENIASSOC1AlID WITH ALL ROCRDALE RQ.00AIIONTOAVOID RELOGTIONOFDISTRBUOON CUSTOMERS CONFLICFWTTBCITY FACD.ITPS SFREEFPRO7 11762150 (9,811) RLTIXQ.IDPFASSOC MDWFFN ALL DALLAS RFIOGTEFACRRTFSDM RELO nONOFDISIRIBUTION CUSTOMERS TOOOVFRNMENIAL FACD.[FIES REQUEST 1210963G (32,984) REfIXE1.D]9FASSOCTATID WITH ALL DALLAS RFLOCATIONTOAVOID RIl nONOFFACB2T1E5- CUSTol F OONFLICTW/PROPOSED RFLOCATEDMTRIBMONFACMOM PROTEGE ASA RESULT OF OOVER14hffN REQMT 12209400 (990) REIIRELIDJT ASSOCIATED WITH ALL DALLAS RFLOCAMFA�DM RELOGTION OF DISIRIBUIION CUSTOM TOGOVERNMEMAL FACD.RffS REQUEST 123Y2690 (342) RBTiRFbDWI ASSOCIATED WITH ALL PROTPOWT REPLACE REFACATTON OF DISTRIBUTION CUSTOb DIFRASIRUCIT7RE FACD.FTIFS 12351350 (4,342) RETIXEMENT ASSOCIATID WIIN ALL ROUNDROCR RELOGTTONTOAVOID RFIOCATION OF DISIRIBVOON CUSIOL1FJt5 CONFLECTWFIRHIONWAY FACRRIFS PROMS 12431466 (101071) RETGtF2.ffNT ASSOCIATEDWFIB ALL GARLAND REPLACE RPLOCATEON OF DISTRB3 ON NStt)L INFRASIRUCNRE FACRU 1205200 (4,872) RETBIQ.ffIPIASSOC1AlID WRH ALL MESQIRTE REPLACE RELOCAMM OF DE B3UTEON NSTOMERS DJFRASIRIICHIRE ACB3T0:5 12M7WG (6.179) REIIXEAIDTFA590CIATIDWIIH ALL ENVBtONS REPLACE RELOCATONOFDISMBUOON CUBFOE0t3 DffRASTRUCfURE ACR m 12718780 (m) RBMB80JFASSOLTATIDWUH ALL SHERMAN REPLACE RELOCATIONOFDISMBUOON CUSTOMERS P6RA.SIRUCNRE FACRIDES 12780010 (41973) RET0F2.RNFASSOCIATEDWRN ALL BEDFORD REPLACE RELOCATIONOFDMWJBURON CUSTOMERS WFMSTRL-CNRE FACO.1TD35 12WIVG (34) RBf➢tQ.RM ASSOCIAIIS WITH ALL EffARNE REPLACE SYSIE7.4 ONROVENffMS-REPGCE CUSTOMERS O@MSTRUCIURE DBEEREOHA IDUNDERGROUND FACB.Vff3 12S0963G (0,417) REHRE7.ID MSOCWTFD ALL FLOWER RELOGITIONTOAVOID MOCAITON OF DISTRIBUTION CUSTOMERS MOUND CONFLiCFWUHCVY FACRVBA STROEFPROIELT Page 107 of 155 E • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 108 of 155 ON OFC MPLRTED PRO)ECIS PL.SCED M GAS UIILRY PROJECf PLANTINSERVICEORRE=D CUSTOMERS NUMBER COST DURRSG 5003 BEHEPIIED LOCATION PURPOSE OF PROFELT 1281969G (6,117) REMET1E11TASSOCIATEDWIPH ALL MCEODIEV REPLACE RELOCATION OF DIST MON CUSTOMERS PIFRASIINC[IRBE FACn rye 13/63096 (4,8)7) REDRETffNIASSOCIATIDWIRI ALL FA WEW REPLACE REIDCATIONOFDISTR® ON CUSTOMERS (COLLDO DhRAS1RUC FAW.I 128"73G (35,"2) REIIXESff19TASSOCIATFDWITH ALL DALLAS RELOCATEFACR.TIDRDUE RELOCATION OF DMS UOON CUSTOMERS TO OOVERNS¢NIAL �FAM= REQUFST 128fl52G (5,862) REfIREMPMASSOCL3T®WITH ALI. FORTWORTH RELOCATEFACU.IIR'RDUE RF3DCATIONOFDL U7OON CUSTOMERS TO GOVERNA¢NTAL FACRATIES REQUEST 12948590 (249) RET@F1107'ASSOCIATEDWDN ALL SHERMAN REPLACE RELOCATIONOFDISTRRIUTION CUSTOMERS RO"RASfRI1C1URE FACLL 1295055G (9,682) RETOtH.ff MSOCIATEDWIIH ALL PLANO REPLACE RELOCATWNOFD6TR39UOON CUSTOMERS WFRa.51'RUCNRE FACRI 12959&6 (9,415) REIRtEM1fENTASSOCIA7EDWITH PLL PLANO REPLACE RFLOCATIONOFDL4 U"OON CUSTOMERS WFRASIRUCfURE FACH.ITIE$ 13158570 (389) RSIIREB@1T ASSOCNTED WITH ALL ROUNDP=K RELOCATIONTOAVOW PMOCATIONOFFACR.ITffS- CUSTOMERS CONFLIawtPROPOSED REPLACE6'PLASIICFR'EWIIH8' PROTECT 131$917G (19) REIIREMEMASSOCNTEDWHH ALL HR3.SEORO REPLACE RELOCAHONOFDISTRU3=ON CUSTOMERS R9FRASTRUCIIRBE FACR.ITIES 131819IG (8) REIIREMQ.RASSOCIATEDWRH ALL WAXAHACHRi REPLACE RELOCATIONOFDLSTRBUOON CUSTOSIFA3 IN£RA$IRUCNRE FACT= 1319/380 (5,261) �ASSOCIATEDWRH ALL MCKDJNEY REPLACE REPLACING RFDULATOR STAOON CUSTOMERS OPRASIRI3CIURE 133M29G (7.490) RET0EN1E1TIASSOCIAUIDWITH ALL A MTON REPLACE RFI.00AT]ONOFDIST UTION CUSTOMERS OGRASTRUC FACd8IRi8 13398280 (49) RE11RE8@TIASSOCUTEDWITH ALL DENTON REPLACE RELOCATION OF DISTRIBUTION CUSTOMERS DUMSTRuC FACnrnFc 13410506 (128) REIIREMENTASSOC m WTD1 ALL WACO REPLACE RELOCAMONOFDISTFIBUOON CUSTOMERS WFRASIRUCNRE FACO.IT6S Page 108 of 155 • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 109 of 155 DESCRBTTON OF MPLETED PROJECTS PLACEIJ IN GAS UT)LRY PROJECT PLANTMSERVICEORREITRED CUSTORO:RB NURSER COST DURMG TORI BF,NHFRED LOCATION PURPOSEOFFROJECT 13531386 (1,391) REIRtF].ffNTAMOCIATEDWITR ALL BRYAN RFJACATWNTO7uw RFL nONOFFACB.ITI65- CUSTOMERS CONFLICT W/PROPOSED RIIACATBMSTR® ONFACRITTFS PROTECT ASARESN.TOFMOFWAY 13Q]O O (19,Q7) ASSOCI m WITH ALL LEANDER RELOCATEFAMd RELOCATION OF DIST UOON CUSTOMERS FACd1TTE5 140MM (B7) IdTRtER43i'I ASSOCIATIDWTIH ALL DEMON REPLACE RELOCATIONOFDISTRTBUTION CUSTOMERS MFRASTItUCRIRG FACO rtma 14129500 (1,677) RETTRFA.>E<Tf ASSOCIATED WITH ALL DFW RELOCATIONTOAVOW RELOCATTONOFFACB.TTfBS- C OF REGIONAL CONFLTCTW/FROFO= RELOCATEIO'STEET..FIPEDUETO A PORT PROTECT AMPORT TERME a CONSTRUCOON 14163360 (330) RETWER4NTASSOCIATEDWITH ALL GREENVBIE REPLACE RELOCATION OF DISTRIBUTION CUSTOMERS MFRASTRUCNRE FACILITTE9 1443]800 (13,30) ALL GARLAND RE 7OOHTOAVOM RELOCATION OF FACdITTES- CUSTOMERS CONFLILTW/FROFORED RFJ.00ATEDTSIR®UITONFACEJTTES PROJECT ASARESULTOFSTREET RECONSTRUCTION 14519560 (934) RL'IBiEM14N'T ASSOCIA]ID W[TH ALL RKYAN FMLOCAUONTOAVOID RELOCATTOHOFFACB.TTIFS- CUSTOMERS CONFUCTW/PROPOSED RELOGTEDISTR®VITON PACB.TCIE9 I PROJECT MAFMULTOFGOVERNRIENTAL UESI 14524196 (174) RET@ ASSOCIATm WITH ALL ARLM6TON RELOCATIONTOAVOB) RELOCAnONATTONOFFACdf11E5- NSTO].ff11S CONFLICIW/PROPOSEO Rt]ACATEDISTR®UTION FACd1i]ES PROJER 14592530 (177)REIMF3.4MT ASSOCIATIUOON ALL R011NDROIX RE LOCATEFACdi'DESDUR RELOCATION OF DIBTR®llTION CUSNhff]t5 TO GOVEIWRIEIfTAL FACB.1TiFS REQUEST 14593860 (Q)RETIR ASSOCIATED WITH ALL FORTWORTH REPLACE RELOCATIONAnON OF OISTA®UTfON NSNRffRS Dh'RABTItUCNRE FACdIT F5 14619596 (563)RETBtAnON ASSOCIATED WITH ALL GARLAND REPLACE REIACAIION OF DLS'[R®UIION CUSTORIERE BiFRASTRllCNRE FACd T@9 14]36flG (314) RETR S60CIATm WITH ALL CAMPBELL REPLACE RELOCATION ATVDNOOP DISTR®URON CTiSTOMERR BiFRASTRUCIURE FACn mce 1473]250 (301) RE'lBtERiQ41'ASSOLTATID WITH ALL SANANGBLO RELOCATTONTOAVOW RFLO MON OF FACdITff3-MST CUSTOMERS CONFLTCIW/PROPOSED 455F OF3'FLABTTCPPEASA IBOTECT RE ULTOFCOMMERCW. DEVELOPM 1475W20 (1"16) I:EIMQ.@ITASSOCIAIID WTIH ALL DALLAS RFLOCATIONTOAVOID REIACAVONOFFAC�- CUSTOMPRS CONE =W/PROPOSED MOCATEDISMHMONFACBSUFS PROTECT ASARESULTOFALLEY 147UVG (66,0U �ASSOCIATEDWITH ALL DENTON RELOCATTONTOAVOID RELOCAVONOFFA�- CUSTOR CONFLTCTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISNUBUITONFACd1TM5 PROJECT ASARESULTOFMGNWAY RECONSTRUCTION 14]63436 (4661 RETRF]rRT.TASSOCIATID WITH ALL ABdENE REPLACE RELOCATION OF DISTR®UTION CUS'RJMBR.9 MFRASfRUCTURE FACdIT�S Page 109 of 155 Ll • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 110 of 155 DESCPJMON OF PR03ECISFLACEDDIGASUTIWiY FRO3ECF PLANE U4 SERVICE OR RETIRED NSFOMERS I NUMRRR COST DU G2003 BH4EFTIHD LOCATTON FIJRFOSEOFPRQIECF 147()460 (7,367) RETRiE1.ffNrASSOCL3TID WCIH ALL DALLAS RF3D MON TO AVOID RMOCATIONOFFACR.IT CUSTOMERS CONFLICIW/PROPOSED RELOCAMDUTIUS HONFACRJTPS PROJECF ASA RESULT OF STREET RECONSTRUCOON 16649206 (4,542) REIWEN¢NTASSOC MW ALL CARROLLTON RELOCATIONTOAVOM RELOCATIONOFFACD.RPS- CUSTOAPRS CONF1.[CFW/PROPOSED MII TEDIBTRIBVOONFAM17UFS PROJECF IM71386 (245) RETEUTSEM ASSOCIATED WHH ALL DALLAS RELOCATION TO AVOM RFLO UONOFFACB.ITIFS- CUSTOMERS COMLICFW/PROPO3ED RELO MDISTRBIUOONFACR,IT10 PROJECF ASA RESULT OF PAVDIO AND DR AGEPROJECT 16671550 (2,480) ItEN2F2..tEl4TASSOCiATm WIM ALL FORTWORTN RELOC MONTOAVOB) RELOCATION OF DISOUBUHON CUSTOMERS NMLICT W[IH CITY FACdITPS 6TREEFmo=T 16675MG (412) REIB<EI.IEJITASSOCIATIID ALL MCGREOOR REPLACE SYSTFMI6PROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTONffR3 DffRASTiIUCIIRUE 250 FEFFOF V BARE STHM PPE WITH 250 FEE( OF P PLASTIC PPE 16681430 (974) RE[BtEME1.TASSOCIATEDWTTH ALL SFIERMAN REPLACE SYSTEM D. PROVETIENTS-REPLACE CUSTOh DhRASTRUCNRE DETERIORAM UNDERGROUND 16694580 (1,177) REFMEv¢2 msmm=wrFH ALL DALLAS RFLOCATIONTOAVOBI RELOCATION OF FAM�. - CUSTOMERS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISTRB3UTIONPACILITIE3 PROJECT 16695320 (1,765) RENREL¢M'ASSOCIATm WITH ALL DALLAS RFTDCATION TO AVOU) RFJACATIONOFFAMOMS- CUSTOMERS CONFWCTW MOPOSM RMOC MDI=BUOONFACRL3IPS PROJECT ASARESULTOFMGHWAY RECONSTRUCTION 16695500 (3,042) MASUD AL FORT WMM OATONTOAV LATIONOFPACTIPS- M W/ROETEDIDUOONF6T FROJBCF 1669689G (2,451) RET AsS :TEDWRN ALL DALLAS RELOCARON TOAVOB) RELOCAMONOFFACR.rFPS- CUSTOMERS CONFLICFW/PROPOS RF]ACATEDLTOUBUDONFACB.FITFS PROJECT ASARESULTOFWI AY RENNSTRUGOON 16714150 (NI) RE[D2ELffNl'gSSOCIATm WfiH ALL ERVWO REPLACE RMOCAITONOFDISTRIBUTION CUSTOMERS D4FRASTRUCNRE FACD.ITIFS 16714630 (43,172) REDREL¢NTASSOCIATEOWRH ALL DENTON RELOCATIONTOAVOD) RELOCATIONOFFACRLTPS- CUSTOMERS CONFUCTW/PROPOSED RELOGTEDLTTRIBUlION FACdIT1E3 PROTECT MAMMTOFHIOHWAY 16743876 (920) REfIlU'AIENT ASSOC1ATm WRH ALL BELLLPAD REPLACE RELOCATION OF DISTRB3UOON CUSTOMERS DPRASTRUCNRE FACB.ITPS 1675 UG (%I) IIETIRE6IQJTASSOCIATEDWTHJ ALL DALLAS RELOCATION TO AVOD) Rp MONOFFACB.IT6S- CUSTOMERS CONFL=W/PROPOSED REIDCAMDISOUSIT IONFAC6TDH3 PROJECF '6751710 (1,311) REMELiFNFASSOCIA'IED WITH ALL HEATH RELOCATEFAMOIES REIDCAUONOFDISTKUUOON CUSTOMERS FAO HOES I6>SSRG (627) REN4EAmJTA550C1ATID WITH ALL SAVOY REIDCATTONTOAVOB) RF2DCATIONOFFACMOM- CUSTOR CONFUCTW/FROPOMD RELOCATEDISTRB3 ONFAM. PROJECT ASA RESULT OF COL9PitCIAL Page 110 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 111 of 165 DESCRnqWN OF 1R PROIRCIS PLACED A' GAS UT6TIY PROJECT PLANTDJSERVICEORRETUiF.D COSIOImu NU6DJER COSF DOROIG2000 RENF.FTIFD LOCATION PURPOSE OF PROJECT 1675625G (301) RFipfEOB]iTASSIX]ATFDWTTTI COMMERCIAL CARROLLTON FORTIFICATION OR SYSTEM DIfiT TIQN OF PUT AND WPROVEMENT APPURTENANCES 16765530 CLM4) RETBihl.08T ASSOCIAM WITH ALL FORTWORTN RELOCATION TO AVOID RELOCATIONOFDISTRDIUTION CUSTOMERS ml F l TVlJIHCTTY FACD.RIES STREEFFROFECF 167BOW (299) REOAEMENTASSOCIATID WITH ALL SHERMAN REPLACE SYSTBM"ROVEMEMS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS EVFRASIRUCIlIRE DETERIORATED UNDERGROUND 16]96500 (3,261) �ASSOC MW ALL DQITON RflDCATJONTOAVOM RFLOCATIONOFFACdIT@S- CUSTOMERS CONFLICFW/PROPOSED RELO MDIST IXUONFACOJJB:S PRO]ECI ASARFSULTOFCOMMFACW. 16803160 (M7) REOREMENTASSOCIATm WTDJ ALL ARB.E61E REPLACE RELOCATIONOFDIST UMON NSTOMERS D9FRASTRUC111RE FAC0.1TIB3 16109580 (1,113) RBIIDE6fE19TASSOCIAl1 mm ALL WOODWAY RBLOCATIONTOAVOID RELOCATIONOFFAC6ITD'SS- NSTOM]M CONEWCIW/PROPOSED RIIOCATEDISIRIBUHONFACO.FIDS PRO= 16801190 (105) RBTIXFAfET9TASSOCIATFDWITR ALL B QURB RELOCATEFACdFItESDUE RBLOC MONOFDISTRDIUDON CUSTOMERS TO 00VERIA4li ACB.ITOS REQMT 1610633G (4098) REI➢tEFIDJFASSOCIAT®WEER ALL COLLEGE RFIOCATIONTOAVOID RELOCATIONOFFACD.ft@S- CUSTOMFJL9 STATION CONFLICIW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDiSIIt®UTION FAC0.1'IIFS PROTECT ASA RESULT OF COMbIDRCLU. DEV 01? EM 16811/40 (1N) RETIXEM1fftr SOCIATFDWFIH ALL AB6ENE REPLACE RBLOCATIONOFDISTR]BMON NSTOME DiFRASIItUCMiE ACO.iTIE9 16WNG (2377) REIRSEMEN(ASSOCIATm WITH ALL WACO R6LOCATIONTOAVOW RELOCATION OF FACORIGS- CUSTOMERS CONFLICF W/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISIRIDUMONFACRITIFS PROTECT ASARFSULTOFSTREBT 16836190 (398) RE191ELBD9TASSOCIATm WIfli ALL LFAFIDER REIDCATEFACB.ITIESDUE RELOCATION OF DIS U7OW CUSTOMERS TOOOVERNME TAL FACBDSE4 REQUEST 16828/80 (5,925) RE19tQ.4N1'ASSOCIA'IEDCOIR/ ALL FORT WORTH REIOCATIONTOAVOID RELOCATION OF DIS U7OON CUSTOMERS CONFLICIWFJHCITY FACLLR STREEF PROJECT 16829380 (US) RET@ELE.@NNIASSOCIATm CORN ALL GADIPSVR,LB REPLACE RELOCATION OF DISTRDRTIION CUSTOMERS INFRAS3RUCTURE FACB.ITIFS 1683525G (22) RETBtE04]Tf ASSOCIATm WTDI ALL GARLAND RELOCATICHTOAVOID RELOCATION OF DISTRD)UIION CUSTOMERS CONFWCIW TFISBWFR FACB.DTFS DRAIN IM13M (I in REJIRE6 ASSOCIATm WITH ALL FOMT RELOCATIONTOAVOID RELOCATION OF DIST U7OON CUSTOMERS CONFLICFWITHERIDGB FACB.DTBS RBCONSTRUCJION 16851480 (5) REIIXEOfENTOFFACRIiTE3-REIIXE ALL CLO -TON RETIRE OIFRASIRUCHIRE 25FEETOF3'BARESTELLPRR CUSTOMEAS Page 111 of 165 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 112 of 165 D N FCOAVME PROSBCTS PLACED IN GAS UTILITY PeO.1ECT PLANTIN SE BRE]TRED CUSTOMERS NUMBER COST DURINGEOG21IM BENEPR-ED IACA'TION PURPOSE OP PRODECF 16851610 (Q REDREhffiNFASSOCIATE-M ALL DENTON REPLACE iMPROVF3.R:M8N NSTOMERS INFRASTRUCTURE DI=U DEIFBIORATm UNDERGROUND FACDDT ES 16860036 (38)SESTINA RASSOCIATED WRH ALL HOWE REPLACE SYSTQADAROVEMENTS-RFBLACE NSTOMER$ DffMSTRUCNRE DEfFRIORATEDllNDERGROUND FACD.R ES 16866190 (IT]) REI R ALL GARLAND RFTACATION TOAVOD) RIIOGTIOISIR®UTION TION OF DFASSOCIAIBMO NBTOMFAE NNFl.ICF WRH CITY FACDITIPS STRFETPROJECf 168]15]6 (327) REFD3Fl.4]JTASSOCIATEDWRN ALL NGRON REPLACE SYSTEMA OVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOM INFRASTRUCNRE j 4%FEEFOFYBAREST PJPEWRN 4W FEEF3"PLASIICPD'E 16889390 (3390) REMENffiNFASSOCIATEDWDN ALL FORTWORTB RF1pCATE FACU.lTff3 RECO MONOFDISDUBUTION NSTOMERS FACETMS 1689910 (14315) fttTIXEAfflFI ASSOCIATED WRH RLI, GRAND RELOGnMMAWM RII AMON OF FACD.ITIE9- CUSTOMERS PRABUE CONE J. WIPROPOSED R MAT I)IS IJT10NFAN.IMS PRORKF 16897610 (115) REJNEBffNF ASSOCIA]FD WFIN ALL FORTWORM RELOCATION N AVOM RELOCATION OF FACRRJES- NSTOMFBS CONE =W/PROPOSED RII ATEDISIR IMMFACRRIE4 PROJECT 16%F7W ('I) REIIREV¢NT ASSOCI WRN ALL CLSN M(XATION M AVOID MMATIONOFPACB.T - NSTOME CONFL W/PROPOSED RII ATE DISDUBU MFACD.ITIF3 PROJECT ASA RESULT OF DRAINAGE DRCN 16%3386 (6,745) RETBtETAINFASSIXDATFDWITR ALL MANSFMD RELOCATIONMAVOM RELOCATION OF DISTRBU M NSTOh CONFLICF W[[H CFFY FAC61TIE5 STREEFPR03ECF 16%7630 (411) REIMEM1DWF ASSOCIA]F9WRH CO81N¢3i FRISCO SYS[E IWMSIONDM INSFALLATIONOFPDRAND TONSMO GROW APPURTENANCES-R4STALL 1,680 FEET01`4-PLASTICME,8FEPROF8' PLASI)C PM AND M FEEF OF 2- 16%59G (476) REMEI E.fENi ASSOCIATEDWRN AL1 SIffRMAN RELOCATIONMAVOD RID.00ATION OF FAMITFS- NSTON1E68 CONL=W/PROPOSED RELOCATEDIS BUTIONFACD.ITiF_S PROJECF AS A RESULT OF COAAff RNV. 16931696 (1,689) REfOU].MNT ASSOCIAt WRN ALL PLANO RELOCATIONTOAVOD3 RFLOCATIONOFFA�- NSTOMFRS CONPWCTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEINS IJTIONFACD= PROJECT ASA RESULT W SIAF£F 16939650 (4,M) REJIRE84NFASSOCNTEDWDN ALL MCEDMEY RELOCATIONOFFACLLR RELOCATION OF DLSTRBIMON CUSFON DUE M OOVFBIA4O9 FACEJ'MS MOMT 1694185E (3,689) RET DBETff UFACD.-REIBtE Att PARIS RETDUJ D9FMSTAUCNRB DIS LFT10NFACDJTfFH CUSTOMERS 1694]6/6 (54) REM ALL ALLEN REPLACE MON OF DBA]BIMON RELOCATION OF DISlA1BURON NSTOMERS DVFRASTRUCNRE FAC6TIIE5 1695390 (6%) RETIXFMENTASSOCIATBDWRN ALL BRYAN RELOCATIONTOAVOM RELOCATIONOFFACM=- CUSTOMERS WIQU FW/PROPOSED RFIOCATEDISTRD3U MFACODRE4 PROJECT ASARESULTOFWGRWAY RENNSTRUCDON 1]149]SG (1.656) REMFn%[O550(:IAiFD WFD3 ALL DALLAS RELOCATIONTOAVOD) RELOCATION OFFAm.1 NSTONIDL4 CONFLICFW/PROPoSED FA RFLOCATEDISIRIBVUON FACD3TIE5 PROIECF AB ARESULTOF STRPEI Page 112 of 165 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID -TEC DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 113 of 166 PROJECTS PLACED IN GAS UTFLRY PROJECT PLANTINSMWCEORRE=D CUEF(3MERS NIIA®6R COST DURTNGND3 BENEFITED LOCATION PURPOSE OF PROJECT 171W5G (b) RETBtQ.ffNFASSOCIATEDWITH R mFM1AL ROUND ROCK SYSTFME%"MONDUE WSTALLATION OF PTE AND TOCUSTON4]t GROWTH APPURTENANCES 131580W (2,133) RETIXEIJFNTASSOCIATID WFTII ALL CEDARH RELOCATIONTOAVOm RECO nA OFFAC(LRIE9- CUSTOM CONFLICFW/PROPOS® RFLOCATEDISTRBIUTIONFACB.ITTE9 PROSECT ASA RESULT OF STREEF 17180890 (8,081) R£MFAm4T ASSOCIATED WITH ALL DALLAS R9.00ATIONTOAV W RflD MON OF FACB.ITRS- CUSTOMERS CONFl.ICFW/PROPOSED RFLOCATEDISO6m=1 FACR-ITIES PROIIX.T ASA RESULT OF PAVING AND DRADIAGE PROJECT 11182836 (4,38) RETBtEA¢NTASSOCLITEDWITH ALL DENIWN REPLACE Sv51FMR OVEBIlNIS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS WFRASTRUC DETERIORATEDUNDEROROUND FACRrt 13188356 (9,903) REIBtII.D2.T ASSOCIATED WRH ALL MANSFB].D RELOCATIONTOAVOm RFLOCATTONOFFACO.RIFS- CUSTOMERS C MJF W/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISIRIRUHONFACB.TCBiS mo= ASA RESULT OF STREEF 13133986 (234) REMB.frNTASSOCIATEDWRH ALL DALLAS 6EIDCATIONTOAVOm RQDCATTON OF FACLLITffi- CUSTOEfFR4 CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RQ.00ATEDISTR®UTION£ACB.DIES PROJPCT ASA RESULT OF PA V Bm OPFRATOW 13136096 (d03) REIIXFAfENFASSOCIATIDWITH ALL SAVOY REPLACE SYSTFMB OVESIENTS-REPLACE CUSTDE ORMSIRUC/URE DETERIOMTED UNDERGROUND FACdTTlE3 13183118 (514) AENiEBffN[ASSOCIATID WRH ALL DUH REPLACE RI] ATIONOFDB B3 ON CUSTOMERS BUIUSTRUCIVRE FAC61TIE5 131853W (003) REI6tE8>a6'A550(:IAiD WITH ALL DESOTO RFLOCATEFAMHE RELOC nWOFDISTRBm110N CUSTOBfFRB FA� 1319NW (985) RETIRRffiITASSOCIATFD WTIH ALL MARBLE RELOCATIONTOAVOW RELOCATIONOFFACU.RICS- CUSTOMERS FALLS CO HF W/PROPOSED RELOCATEDIBTR B=NFACB.I PROIEC! ASA RESULT OF COMAffAC W. I8om0 (830) RE1lltQ.IIATTASSOCIA3EDWIIH ALL THECOI.ONT R©.00ATTONTOAVOm RF TIONOFFA�- CUSTOMERS CONFLICFW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISIRBNTIONFACd= PROTEGE ABARESULTOI`STREET RECONSTRUCTION Imlim (8.904) REMEEBBPFASWCLITEDWTTH ALL DALLAS R61.00AMMO AVOm RELOCATION OF FACB.RRS- CUStt3NIFR3 CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RFLOCATEDISTIUBUITONFACB.IlIB9 PROTECT ABA RESULT OF PAVING AND 1833930 (281) RPTIXEM1fl;N'FASSOCL33FD WITH ALL CLEBURNE RETMCE SYST RaROVFAffi4T5-REPLACe CUSTOMERS OIFRASIRIICIISRE 135=OFCASTWONM SWTTH 4' MMMC PIPE 18 50 (13.505) REMQ.40IFASSOCIA'TPD WITH ALL DALLAB RdOCAT10NTOAVOm RII.00ATIONOFFACB.PDI+d- CUSlON0l5 RRiFLICFW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISTRI MONFACRJTTES PROTEGE ASA RESULT OF DRABUGE PROSECT 1831806 (MO RETBU]NEI£[ASSOCNTED WRIT ALL BRYAN REPLACE BYSTWBaROVELIENTS-RFPLACEI CUSTOMERS OYFRASTRUCNRE FOOTOF4- WRAPPEDSTEEL,318FEET OF4-BARES=AND319F OFW Page 113 of 166 i� i C ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID -TOC DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 114 of 155 OFRCR ONOFCOWUMD PRO2ECB PLACED N GAS UTTWiY PRO= PIANTINRERVICEORRETIRED CUSTOMERS NUBBER COSI' DIJRDSGIOD 8ENEFRED LOCATION PURPOSe OF PROJECT 1'233006 (1,619) REBREI¢FTT ASSIX.TATED WTTH ALL SHERMAN NSTALLAHONOR RELOCATION OF FACR.RBS. CUSTOMERS RFPLACEMENI OF RELOCATE DISHUCT REOIRATQR AffABURAffNTOR STATION REGULATION EQUWT 1T OOG (1,511) aETRtEM1ID MSOCIATEDWRH ALL SHERMAN REP m SYSTEMD.@ROVETffMS.REPLACE CUSTOMERS INFRAETRUC 800PEETOFDWSED6' 17258240 (1,960) REMEBIDOTASSOCLITED ALL Her TOM= RJ]ACATEFACDTHFSDOE RELOCATION OF DISTRBUHON CUSTOMERS TO OOVERNME FACU= REQUEST IR61A0 (5.458) RET6IE5@M'ASSOCIATEDWUH ALL DALLAS RELOCATJONTOAVOD RELOCATION OF FACR.I33E8- NSTOMERS CONFL W/PROPOSED RLLOCATEDBTRBUTIONFAMMES PROJECT ASARESULTOFPAVNOAND IT16939G (2363) RET)AEMENT ASSOCiAT®WITH ALL ORAPBVDIE RELOC MONTOAVOD REIACATIONOFDISTRBUTION CUSTOMERS CONFL[CTWRHCRY FACTLT STREETFROJECT ITLTS/OG (85) REBUTAENTASSOCIATED W3IH ALL GARLAND RELOCATEFACRJFIESDUE RELOCAHONOFDISTRIBUTION CUSTOMERS TO GOVERNhBNTAL FACD]TBS REQUEST IR7S180 (3) FETIRE616YTASSOCIATED ALL GATESVR.LE REPLACE SYSTE88DSPROVEMENTS-REPLACE NSTOMERS NFRvBTRUCIIJRE 130FEETOF3'WRAPPEDST PME WITH IJOFEETOF3•PLASHCPIPE IM75986 (206) RETBEMENTASSOCIATEDWTIH ALL EMORY REPLACE RELOCATION OF DISIRBUHON CUSTOMERS RhRASTRU=E FACRT Inm7 (56) IlE1BE1.ffNTOFFACMOM- ALL ROCIFESTER RETBE NFRASTRUCNRE ARANDONOFEETOF2-PLA313CPIPE CUS3OMER5 IR7MW (43) REI3REMBNTASSOCIATEDWTTH ALL WACO REPLACE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS -REPLACE CUSTOMERS NFRASTRUC 3M FEETOF 4' CASTRRON FTPE WOR 392FEEIOF4'PLAS7OCPlFE ITYJ881G (99) RETDBI.BNTASSOCNTED ALL WHITEWUGH REIIRE ATRASTRUCNRE R VALOFFACRJTBS-ABANDON CUSTOMERS T 115FEETOF2'BARESTEELPR'E I27884G (69) REIIXEMINTASSOCIATED WITH ALL WHIIEWRIOH REBRE D9FRASTRUCHJRE RFJ60VALOFFACIL -ABANDON CUSTOMERS T 100 FEEL OF I' BARE STE EL FIPE IR88560 (217) REIBFABHTASSOCIATEDW ALL MCER9NEY REPLACE RELOCATIONOFDISTRBUOON CUSTOMERS RffRASTRUCNR6 FACDITBS IMU20 (IM) OADIPS E REPLACE SYSTEM NIPROVEABMS-REPLACE CUSIOADBLS NFRASTRUCNRE DETERIORATEDUNDERGROUND IT28538G (317) jaETUtE1.fEHTAS50C1AmWUH ALL FORTWORTH RELOCAHONTOAVOD RELOGnONOFFACRJTBS- CUSTONBRS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATBDISTRBUIIONFAC = PROJECT AS A RESIAT OF STREET IT28134G (312) RETffiEBBNTA850CIATEDWRH ALL STEPHENVRL aama NFRASTRUCNRE REMOVALOFFACR.RBS-ABANDON CUSTOABRS E 508 FEET OF 2- PLASTIC F@E IRBMIG (153) REHREE4lTT ASSOCIATED WRH ALL OADIFSVD,LE REPLACE RELOCATIONOFDISTRBUTION CUSI'ONBRS INFRASTRUCTURE FACR.ITIES Page 114 of 155 • c • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Pepe 115 of 155 D ON OF FROMM PLACED IN GAS UTILITY PROJECT PUNT AI SERVICE OR RETRIED CUSTOMERS NUMBER COST DURBIG 2061 BENERTIED LO nm PURPOSE OF PROJECT IMUS20 (1,613) RETIXEL¢I.T ASSOCIATED WITH ALL WYLIE RELOCATIONTOAVOW RELOCATIONOFFAMOOES- CUSTO6 CONFLICIW/PROPOSED RELOCATE DMTR[BUTION FACRp PROJFLT ABA RESULT OF OOVERM.D}]IAL 17292790 (617) �ASSOCIATEDWTIH ALL BRYAN REPLACE SYSTEMAIPROVQ6QN5-REPLACE CUSTOMERS ODRASTRUCCURE 200 FTYT OF 3- S= P W E AND 600 FEETOF 6" STFII. PM TRM83G (324) RBTBlEME1.TASSOCIATEDWNN ALL BRYAN REPLACE SYSTEMA@ROVEAE.ffiNTS-REPLACE CUS]OA1ER5 DDRASTRUCURE 380TOFOF I'STEEL PWIN1680 FEET O F 4" PLASTIC PBE 1RB9510 (6) RETDUTIDJT ASSOCU.l ALL LEONARD RETRACE -WCp3 SYSTEMRATED CUSTOMERS ]NFRABIRUCIIIRE NDERG-REPLACE DEIQUORATED UNDERGROUND FACAIT F5 1690000 (73) RMOCATINOFFCIATEO WON ALL pIN10N RELOCATWIPROAmm RELOCATIONOFFACAR768- CUST0E1[LIS CONFLICT WI PID RFL.00ATEDISTRTBUOONFACATIDS PROJECT IR90010 (1,826) ATD FORT WORM REOCATION TOAV) ATIONOFFT- CUSTOM CONLCIWIPROm LTEDS[RBUTION FAC� PROJECT AS ARFSULT OF SIRES[ IR9160G (IR) RMOCAnONOF ALL ARLINGTON REPLACE MTRRRYOON RELOCATIONOF DISIR®UTION CUSTORffRS DO"RASIRUC[URE FACD.ITIF_4 IM9337G (363) RETBOT.ANT ASSOCmT® WITH ALL ARLINGTON REPLACE SYSTEMR.IPROVFMEMH-REPLACE CUSTOMff Rh'RASTRUC[URB M6MTOF4'9TEELPTE WITH226 FFETOF4^PI.ASI)CPWE IR93630 (821) REMQ.DNIAB80LTATm WNH AI.L LONGVATV RELOCATIONTOAVOD RELOCATIONOFDIBTR®UTION CUSTOMERS (GRFGG CONNlawnm CITY FACU,INFS COUNTY) WATERMAINFROIECT IMS650 (31) RETIXE3.DNIASSOCI WTIH ALL FORTWORTH REPLACE SYSTE4ATPROVE61QTI8-REPLACE CUSTDMFRB Rh'RASIRUCNRE 192 FEEIOF Y STEEL.FPEAND 102 FEETOF 2" STMLFPE WITH 173FEBT 17298J3G (141) REINET>@I'TASSOCIATEp WI3H ALL MUINGTON REPLACE REN.ACEMENTOFDAMAGED CUSTOMFRB RIFRASTRUC UM FACU NRiS I]3013OG (483) RFTRET7EPNASSOCIATtD WITH ALL LONGWEW REPLACE R¢OCATIONOFDSTRIBUNON CUSTOMERS (GRROG D7FRASTRUCIVRE FACAITM CO 1]301360 (12,711) RFTIlE81ENTASSOCIAIFD WITH ALL BRYAN RFLOCATIONTOAVOM RELOCATIONOFFACATOM- CUSTOA1E]t3 CONFLICIW/PROPOSED RMOCATEOISTRIBUOONFACU.NIES PROJBCT M ARESUT.TOF SEWER T730149G (].926) RFTIIH.4TIIASSOCIATID WIpI ALL IWNG RELOCATIONTOAVOID R&OCAUONOFFACUL - CUSTOMERS CONFUCTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISTR®UUONFACATTIFS PROJECT ASARESULTOFRBOONSTRUCOON 17302070 (2,193) REMETIENTASSOC MWFIH ALL DALLAS RPPI.ACE RELOCATION OFDISTR®UIION CUSTOMERS WFRASIRUCTURE FACRJTAS l7JM]3G (74) RET@Q.IDNTASSOCIATIDWTM ALL ARLINGTON RELOCATEFAC&TOMDUE RELOCATIONOFDBTUBUUON CUSTOMERS TOOOVERNMENTAL FACAINBS REQUEST Pepe 115 of 155 r L 1 1 L J ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 116 of 155 DS ON OF PROTECT£ PLACED a GAS UTI.RY PROJECT PI INSERVICEORREFIRED CUSTOMP.RS NUAOiER COST DURING 2063 RENF:SRED LO nON PURPOSE OF PROTECT 1730303G (142) REI1RE60NTASSOCIATEDWITH ALL GARLAND REPLACE SYSTEMQ.PROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS QIFRASTRUCNRE DETERIORATED UNDERGROUND FACIdTPS 17MMO (198) RElREE1EITTASSOCIA=ID ALL GARLAND REPLACE SYS] WROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS PPRASTRUCNRE DETERIORATED UNDERGR 1Wo525G (42) REORE6PDNTASSOCIATIDWRH ALL ABMENE REPLACE SYSTEM RPROVk].fEN REPLACE CUSTOMETLS MFMSTAUCIIIRE 200 FMOF 4' BARE STEN. PPE WO31 200FEETOF4-PLASTICPPE 17305MG (160) RE-IBiFA@NT ASSOCIATED WITH ALL ALLEIN RFLOGnONTOAVOW RELOCATION OF FACIWTPS- CUSTOMERS CONFLICT W/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISIRIBUIIONFACB.OES PAOPLT 17308066 (W) RLTRELIDNTASSOC =WOH ALL CHAFaMl RFLOCATEFAW.TOESDUE RELO MONOFDISTRBIUNON CUSTOMERS TOOOVERNMENTAL FACD.THES UES] 1731097G (675) REIIREB@ITASSOCIATm WOH ALL PLANO RFLOCAOONTOAVOM RELOCA'OONOFFACUPITFS- CUSTOMERS CONEL W/PROPOSED RMOA TEDI=BMONFAMOM PROJECT ASA RESULT OF CUSTONOT IW1199O (10) RETIIEbff3TTASSOCiATEDWITH ALL DALLAS REPLACE SYSTEM D. SPROVE6fENNTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS DPRASOtUCNRE 185 FEETOF 8' WRAPPED STEEL. PPE WTTH 189 FMOF 8-PLASTICPPE 1'!326636 (1.548) RETDtEAffNTASSOCIATIDW ALL BRIDTEPORT RELOC!OONTOAVOW RELOCATIONOFFA�- CUSTONffR3 CONFLICTWIPROPOSED RELOCATEDl=BUOONFAW.TTIES PROTECT j ASA RESULT OF GOV ERM.PN ln2WBG (5.388) RET@EMENTASSOCMMDWOH ALL EIDILOTTDAN RDDCADONTOAVOM RELOCATION OF FACdRIFS- CUSTOMERS LONPLICTWIPROPOSED RELOCATEDISMBUOONFACIDTTPS PROJECT IW2826G (4,869) REIRTEeffNTASSOCIATEDWITH ALL RICHAROSON RELOCATIONTOAVOM RELOCATIONOFDISMBUOON CUSTOMERS COIOI.ICTWRHCRY FACn rtme STRF3O PROJECT 173UM (6.821) RETIRENffNTASSOCIATEDWITH ALL ARLINGTON RFLOCATIONTOAVOID RFLOGTION OF DISTRIRURON CUSTOMERS CONFLICTWRHCOY FAMIMES SIREETFROJECT IW30446 (3.255) RETOtEJ1ffNTASSOCO.TEDWON ALL DENTON RELOCATION TO AVOID RFJ-OCATIONOFFACO.OPS- CUSTONM 00N 1CTW/PROPOSED RF2DCATEDI UOONFACLTJPS PROTECT ASAFESULTOFSTRFJ3T 17330636 (6) RETMETffM'ASSOCIATEDWOH ALL MFSOTITIE REPLACE RELOCATION OF DISMBUOON CUSTOMERS W£RASTRLCTURE FACO. 17330866 (266) AETIXE61F3NI'ASSOCIATED WITH ALL CEDARPARR RET.00AT30NTOAVOID RELOCATION OP DISTRIBUTION CITSTOMERS CONFLICT WTIHC((T FACI.OPS STREET PROTECT 19340810 (821) RETItEMENTASSOCIATEDWOH ALL WACU RFLOCATIONTOAVOID RELOCATIONOFFAC6.TTP8- CUSTOMERS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATE DTRIR®VIIONFACLLITIES PROJECT AS A RESULT OF ONCRPASED LOAD I9 MG (2) RETIRII.fftO ASSOCIATED WTO3 ALL A711ENS REPLACE SYSTFAIIMPROVE6PNT8-REPLACE CUSTOMERS DNeRA6TRUCT6RE 100 FEETOF BARE STEEL PPE WITH PLASTIC PPE 17353046 (769) RETRiF3.D6O ASSOCIATED WOH ALL RO WALL RELOCAOONTOAVOID RELOCATIONOFFACDSTPS- CUSTON CONFLCTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISFR®UIION FACD.[itES PROTECT AS A RESULT OF SIRFF[ Page 116 of 155 • 0 • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 117 M 155 D F MP PROJECTSPLACEDJNGASUFRLTY PROJECT PL M SERVICE OR RRT2RED COSFOMFJtB NUABBER COST DURING IWO BENEFfIi;D LOCAnON PIIRPOSROFPROJECT 1931687G W) REJ'RtES4llTAS50CL11IDWITFI ALL WACO REPLACE SYSTEM ID4ROVR.¢N'TS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS A'FRASTRUCIURE 330REEFOFCCA MONMEWTTH 3501P 70F4'PLASITCPEPS 19323330 (29,076) REJR9EL4NTASSOCIATEDWRH ALL MANSFDT.D RELOCATIDNTOAVOM RELOCATIONOFFACHJTffS- CUSTOMERS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDIST IJTKWFAC6.T PROTECT ASA RESULT OF EASE6ffidT ISSUES 193260M (3,616) REIIREMFSITASSOCWTED W[TN ALL DALLAS RELOCATIONTOAW)W RE3.00ATIONOFFACQ.ITIF4- CUSTOAfERS CONFLICFW/PROPOSED RELOCATE MMIBI=NFACH.ITTES PROJECT ASARESULTOFPAVNOANO 19333671 (IOC) ALL LANCASTLR RPLOCATTONTTJAVOH) RELOCATIONOFFACR.Il1F5- CUSTOMERS CONPLICCW/PROPOSED REL MDISTRH311TIONPACH.TUR9 PROJECT ASA RESULT OF GO V ERNMENTAL 193MOO (149) RETHt&3ff:NTASSO TIDWRN ALL WACO REPLACE SYSTTM HHPROVEMINIS-REPLACE NSTOMERS PRRASTRUCRME IOOFEET01`3'13 R STEEE.P@EW 110FEEF01`3"PLASTiCP@E 19MIOIG (260) APIHIFAffN'I ASSOCIATED WfIH ALL FORTWORTN RFLOCATIONTOAW)M RELOCATIONOFFACR,RIE4- CIISIOMERS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDTSTMI=)NFACH.TTIB9 PROJECT ASARE.SULTOFBR 19M28OG (155) REMII.ffhT ASSOCIATED WITH ALL CLSCO RELOCATIONTOAVOID RELOCATION OF FAM - CUSTOMERS CONFMCTW/PROPOSED RE]. nl)ISTR@UTIONFACIIJT PROJECT 19392880 (%) RENtFJr1ENTASS =IMTTII ALL WAW REPLACE RELOCATIONOFDMUBIJTION CUSTOMERS JNFRA5TRUC FACILR 193/3900 (298) RETUtFMEN1'ASSOLTATED WTIH ALL WACO REPLACE SYSTFMH.iPROVE64MS-RIMACE NSTOMERS INFRASTRUC 200FEET0F3'BARESTF}LP2E WRH 220 FEET OF 3' PLAST IC POE 19350250 (352) RETHtEAfEWTA33OCIATEDWRH ALL FORTWORTH RELO TIONTOAVM RELOCATIONOFFAC6RHi5- CUSTOMERS CONFLTCTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISTRH3IJTTONFACILT PROJECT ASARFSULTOPSTRFBT 19350M (8) IIEtIRFA¢FIT ASSOCIAhD WITH ALL FRI.SCD RELOCATEFAM6 RE2ACATIONOFDISTRH3UUON CUSTOMERS FACILI 19351510 (537) REI➢IFADTITASSOCIATID WITH ALL FORTWORTH RELIX:ATIONTOAVM RELOCATIONOFFACR.IT@4- CUSTOMERS COF6LICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATED6TR@UJTONFACILITffS PROJECF ASARESULTOPSTREET 19352566 (413) REDRFMEMASSOCGITEDWRH ALL SHPIUAAN REPLACE SYSTEM HUPROVEAffMS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS ATRASIRUCI'fIRE DEI'EAIORATEDUNDEROROUND 19353931 (233) ALL SAN ANGFlA REPLACE SYS TEM OVEM1M1>Etd13-REPLACE CUSTOBIDLS A'FRASTRUCNRE OF 2- 339 FEET OF 2' BARE STEEL PIPEWTIEI 339 FEEL OF T PLASI3C PB'E 19353966 (93) RETJRFMFMASSOCLITF ALL GREFJIVR.LE REPLACE SYSTEM L3WROVEMENI3-REPLACE STEEL MAWS CUSTOMERS D6RASTRUCRIRE 19354406 (492)REI➢IEIl43VTAS50C1ATED WI'M ALL SAN ANGELO REPLACE SYSTEM OVEMENIS-RE a CUSTOMERS INTRASTRUCNRE 220=OFVBARESTETJ.PHSWTIH 220 FEET OF 4' PLASTIC PITT 19357066 U.W) RETHUH.fEM'ASSOCIAIID WITH ALL SAN ANGELO REPLACE SYST IWROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSIORIER3 WFRAS]RI1C[URE 310FEETOFr BAREST LPPEWRN 390 FEEL OF 8' PLASTTCP@E Page 117 M 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 118 of 155 DMCRH TIUV UFCO D PROJECTS PLACED UI GAS UTUATY PROJECT PLAN WIN V(CEORREFRIED COSTOMRS NUMBER COST DURING2003 BRNF.FTTED LOCATION PURPOSROFPROJRCT 1935VQ (1) RETQfQ+BiM'ASSOMTm WTTH ALL A=(PAREER RELOCATIONTOAVOID RF2.00ATIONOFFACB.TTIES• CUSTOMERS COUNTY) CONFLICFW/PROPOSED RELOCATEOUF UIIONFACRI]TFS PROSECT ASA RESULT OF GOV ERNMENTAL RBQUMT 1935WW (185) RETIXEi fr]iTASS MWTTH ALL MANO RELOCATIONTOAWXD RFIOCATIONOFFACBPTTFS- CUSTOMERS CONFLICTW/PROP08E0 Md TEDIS UTIONFACU,T= PROSECT 19359620 (3) RETIXESffl4T ASSOC3 TED WTIH ALL LEONARD REPLACE SYSTEMB.fl•ROVPAR]11H-REPLACE CUSTOMERS DIPRASTRUCIURE DETERIORATED UNOGNp OUFUJ FACMI 19365240 2R) REMID.IDA'A&SOCIATMWTTH ALL WACO MOCATTON TO AVOID RELOCATION OFFACR2TDS- NSTOMERS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED AELOGTE DISTRBVITONFAW.ITRS PROJECT ASA RESULT OF MOCATION TO 193656M (336) RETIRES¢NTASSOMTmmm ALL BBLLMEAD REPLACE SYSIF U&ROVEMENIS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS OiFRASTRUCDme 290 FEETOF 4• BARE STID. PIPE WNII 1936300G (2.5%) RETQtELff14'TASSOCIATED W[IH ALL SHFSOMN REPLACE SYSTEM U-iPROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMEBS WFRASTRUCNRE DETERIORATED UNDERGROUND FACBPTM 19368110 (z191) RETIXFAffNTA350MTFD WTTH ALL DALLAS REPLACE SYSTFMR.flRovEMENI3-REPLACE CUSTOMM BhRASTRUCTURE IWTOFI2'BARESTEEL P@E WTTN100FEETOF12•PL T[CPUS 19365AG (423) REIWEI4ETN ASSOMTED WITH ALL TEMPLE REPLACE SYSTEM D4ROVEMENT3-REPLACE CUSTOMERS WFRASTRUCTURE DETERIORATED UNDERGROUND FACILTTDS 19369350 (332) RETIXEZ.>ENT ASSOMTm WITH ALL G�VO-LE REPLACE RELOCATIONOFMTMUTION CUSTOMERS WFRAB UCTURE FACB.IT@S 193T331G (10364) RETBiEb4]J'I ASSOCIATED WITH ALL TFBR L R OCARONTOAVOB) RELOCATION OF FACR.RffS- CUSTOMERS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATE DISTR®UTION FACB.TlIE9 PROSECT AB ARES TREET RECONSTRUCRON RUCTEO 19333990 (49) RETIXF1..tE1TI ASSOCIATED WITH ALL WACO RBLOCATION TO AVOW R OCATIONOFFACB.ITIFS- CUSTOMERS CONFI.ICTW/PROPOSED RFIOCATEDiSTR®UTION FACdITIFS PRO= AS A RESN.T OF DRI V ER'AY 19330T/0 (394) RETIRESffNTOFFACRTTRS- ALL LUEDFRS RETIXE WRASTRUCTURE ABANDON 563 FEETOFTBARE SLID. CUSTC3MER5 PUS 193339W (1,012) RBIDiQ1ENl'ASSOCIATID WTIH ALL BONHAM REPLACE SYSTFMAbROVEAffME-REPLACE CUSTOMERS WFRASTRUC UW DE UORATEDUNDERGROUND FACU.RDS 19338080 (381) RET@EN NTASSOCIATFIJWITH ALL WACO REPLACE 3YST D&ROVF1.iQiT3-REPLACE CUSTOMERS OSFRASTRUCIURE 3121 FEET OF 4' CAST UU)N PUSMTH 352= OF4-MAMC PIPE Page 118 of 155 11 • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 119 of 156 DESCRRRON OF COMPLETED PROSECISPLACED DS GAS URLFIY PROSECT PLANTSNSERVICEORRLTAIED CUSTOMERS NUMBER COST DURUVG SOM BENEFRED IACATTON PORPOSEOFPROSECT 19379550 (122) RGI@EMENI ASSOCIATED WRH ALL LASE WORTH RELOCATIONTOAVOW RELOCATION OF FACRPT@8- CUSTONURS WLLAOE CONFLIC£W/PROPOSED RELOCAiEDISTRBUMONFACILITBiS PROTECT AS A RESULT OF STREET 193WMG (07) REIBFLiENTASSOC1ATm WRH ALL RICIGRDSGN R£LOCATTONTOAVOM RELOCATION OF FACE.RBS- CUSTOMERS CONFLiCFW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISTRBURCNFACU.ITIES PROSECT AS A RESULT OF ALLEY 1938200 (42) RETODAeENTASSOCIATEDWRH ALL NBUSSA FORHFICATION OR SYSTEM SYSTEM U.@ROVFMENTS- CUST S MPROVEMENT FORT@ ICARON OF OFFSITE MARLS, W RH PART] W. REPBURSEFIDli BT 19382850 [!54) RE'IDtE6B11'I'ASSOCIA"TFD WRH ALL WACO REPLACE SYSTEM A.BROVENPMS-REPLACE NSTOMERS DSFRASIRUCTURE 214 FEET OF 2' GST BQN PAE AND IW FEET OF 4` CASTBtWJP@E WI1H 1938%2O (125) REIBEAWPRO SOCIAT WRH ALL WACO REPLACE - SYSTPM ]MPR B -REPLACE CUSTOMERS USFRA.9IRUCNRE BARES 181 FEET OF 2' BARE SCID. P@EWIfH 110 FEET OF 2'PLASTIC P@E 19191056 (7tl) RSIBEETIONOFOCILIIDS-TH ALL AOIIND ROCK RELOCATTONROPOSI3 RII.00ATION OF FACRRIFS- CUSTOMERS CONFWCTW/PROPOSED AELOCATE PROSECT TOFRIBUiIONFAC ASARESULTOF GOVERNMENTALAL 19393970 (32) ALL SI@AMAN REPLACE SYSMIffI9TASSOCIATEDWIIH SYSTE E CVSTONBAS D@RASTRUCNRE OHAM DETtORREPLACE UNDERGROUND FAMOOEATID FACBRBS 19392990 (1) SYSTP NTASSOC1AT ALL SFBAE1AN REPLACE SYSCFId -RM CUSTOMERS A9FRASTRUC[URE RATEDUNDMORREPLACE D=OAIAmEROROUND FACAS BS 1939H]6 (SO REMEI.JENTASSOCIAT ALL TERR9.I. REPLACE SYS1l - CUSTOMERS D9FRASTRUCIISRE OFATMUNDERO-REPLACE DACILMAATED IItA)EROROUND FACA.ITIE4 193966'tti (6) WITH ALL DUNCANVAl REPLACE IMOCAEMUDICIATm RELOCATONOF DISTRBURON CUSTOMERS ABFRAS]RUCIURE FAC0,1'IIES 19396RG (21) AETBEEBTRASSOCIATIDWRH ALL TOSNUA REPLACE RELOCATION OF DISIRBUISON CUSTOMERS AERASTRUC0IRE FACMR 193VI20 (3,140) REIBFAJENT ASSOCIAIED WIFR ALL DALLAS RELOCARONTOAVOD) RELOCATIONOF£ACD.RBS- CIISTOM0L5 CONFLICTWSPROPOSED RFLOCATEDBTRIBUTIONFACATTBS PROJECT ASAMULTOFPAWNGAND 19900866 (713) RETBET-43RASSOCIATm WTM ALC FORT WORTH RELOCATTONTOAVOM RELOCATION OF FACA.RBS- CUSTOMERS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISIABUIIONFACA.RBS PROJECT AS ARESUI-TOF STREET 1%0269G (386) If LTDBMENTAS$CCNTID WITH ALL PLANO REI.00ATIONTOAVOD RE TIONOFFACAPTJES- CUSTOMERS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED REIACATEDISTRBU00NFACD.= PROSECT 1%0316G (24) IBlBE808'TASSOCIACPD WITH ALL MCKWNEY RRACATIONTOAVOW RELOCATION OF FACA.RO:S- CUSTOMERS CONRICFW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISDUBU IONFACRIMS PROJECT ASA RESULT OF STORM SEWER I%05116 (%) RLTRE80JTASSOCIACED WTFH ALL SO� RB.00ATIONOFFACRRB9 LOWERDIGCGASMADJOUTOF CUSTOMERS SEWER FLOW LME 1%0]080 (1,874) REFDBM1AAJI ASSIX:IAIID WITH ALL MANSFAID RELOCATIONTOAVOW RELOCATION OF FACERES- CU mWWS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATED6T IXOCNFACLLRBS PROTECT ASARESULTCESTREET Page 119 of 156 11 F -IL ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 120 of 155 DESCR ONOFCOMPLETED PROJECTS PLACED IN GAR UITJ.TTY PROJECT PTANTMSFRVICEORRETIRED CUSTOMBRR NUABER CORP DURWG 2003 RENEFTTED LOCATION PURPOSE OF PROJECT 19007980 (619) RETIRFAILTTASSOCIAIIDWITH ALL LONOV RIMOCATION TO AVOID RJFLO' ON OF FACM=. CUSTOhIEM (GRI:00 CONFLICT WI PROPOSED RELOCATE DISTRIRUDON FACMU COUNTY) PROTECT AS A RESULT OF GOVTRFp1ENTAL 19619860 (I7) RETIRFA1EnTASS000ATFI) I ALL WINMSRORO REPLACE SVSTFTf U.@AOVEM1ffMS-REPLACE NSTOh1ER5 WRASMUCTM DETERIORATED UFIDMOROUND FAMROS 1902MSG (3,013) RET02FAffNT ASSOCIAMD ALL FORTWORTH RELOCATIONNTOAVOM RELOGTIONOFFACILTfIPB- NSTOh1ER5 CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISTRUBUTCNFACILU PROTECT AS A RESULTOF SIREhT IW20296 (5,569) REIfRQ.ff01i ASSOCIATED WPM ALL FORT WORTH RELOCATIONTOAVOM RELOCAt10N OF FACILrtIFS- CUSTOh CUNFLICTW/moo m RELOCATEDISTRU3UTONFACIL1 PROTECT M ARESULTOF STREET RECONSTRUCTION 19/21306 (29.161) REM2E61aPT ASSOCIATED WITH ALL DALLAS RFLOCATEFACILTffSDUE RLLOCATION OF DUTUBUOON CUSTOMERS TO OOVFSM.4NTAL FACILITIES REQUEST 19021830 (317) REIREhWNNTASSOCIATm WITII ALL "mLL RELOCATION TO AVOID RELOCATION OF FACR.IDER- NSTOMERS CONFLICT WI PROPOSED REIDCATEDLSTRUBUTONFACILOM PROSECT ASARESULTOFAIRPORT 19025020 (35) REIIXE6ffNT ASSOCIATED WITH ALL WHITESBORO REPLACE SYSTEM B.IPROVFAffiTIS-REPLACE CUSTabaW D STRUCMRE DEIFSIORATFD UNDERGROUND FACD.IT@S 19/25020 (247) RETIXETIEIVTASSOCIAIID WTIH ALL WICHITA MFLACE SYSTENPROVEbffiNTS-REURE371 CUSTOA FALLS INFRASTRUCTURE FBETOF2-BAREST}} LPW 19026130 (1.009) RETIRE64NT ASSOCIATED WITH ALL LONGVIEW RELOCATION TO AVOID RELOCATION OF FACD.ITTES- CUSIOh (GREOG CONFLICTW/FROPOM RELOCATEDISD(IDUTIQNFACB.ITTES COUNTY) PROJECT ASA RESULT OFOOVERNAIFNTAL 19426270 (8) RE[BtEhI+1ENTASS0CL3TMWIIN ALL FORT WORTH Rl%D TIONTOAVOID RELOCAUONOFFAC6ITD:S- CUSTU64ER3 CONFLICT W/PROPOSED RELOCAT DlVl DMONFACURTff3 PROJECT ARA RESULT OF STREET 19030906 (101) RETIXEOIDlTAEWLMTEDWHH ALL MO3LOT30AN RELOCATION TO AVOID RELO nm()FFACDRHE4- CUSTOMERS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISTWBUTTQNFACIIT PROJECT ASA RESULT OF STORM SEWER 190%326 (291) REMELOlTASSOC MWMTII CONAffRCW. DALLAS SYSTEMEEPANSIONDUE DJSTALLATION OF PIPE AND TOCUVOh1EROROWTH APPURTENANCES 19037030 (7n RETIXEhDHP ARSOC1ATM WT H ALL ENNIS REPLACE SYSTFNI6 OVFAfEM3-REPLACE CUSTOhR]tR INiRASIRUCIURE DETERIORATM UNDMOROUND FACU. IPS 19039350 (19) REMtEM1 ASSOCIATED WTM ALL T COLONY REPLACE SYSTEMR OVIMENTR-REPLACE CUSTOhIEM RJFRAR]AIJC UNDERGROUND FACILITIES 19439386 (208) REIIXFMEIJTASm TEDWRA ALL BROWNSBORO REPLACE SYSTEMMPROVQ.OiMMS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS MFRASTRUCfIJRE UETERIORATMUNDFRGROUND FACIE= ImMG (0) REIBtEhOR ASSOCIATED WI[H ALL DEMON RELOCATION TO AVOID RFlOGTION OFFACILIT - CUSTO6IDL9 CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RFIOCAMMSTRIDUTONFACMITIPS PROJECT Page 120 of 155 • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 121 of 155 D ONOFCOMPLEMIS FROMM PLACED W GAS OTWTY PROJECT PLANT BV SERVICE ORRETIXED CMSTOMERS NUMBER COST DURUJGZXU BENEFI[ED LOCATION PURPOSEOFPRCM= 19 950 (393) REIRtfI..tEli'TASSOCN'IED WRH ALL RMSEL REPLACE RELOCAITONOFDIST13BUHON CUSTOMERS BOFMSIRUCRIRE FACB.ITIES 19M388G (11) REfUtEAm4TASSOCNTm WRH ALL BRUSHY RMOCATTONTOAVOM RELOCATION OF FACU.TTES- CUSTOMERS CREEK CONFLICTW/PROPOSED IDUIION FACB.THM PROJECT ASAM LTOF ASARMULt OFCUSTOMER IIF3I 19M7190 (116) SETBJQ. 0CIATFWITH ALL SHERMAN REPLACE AFRO SYS113.1RMENT3-REPLACE CUSTOMERS BU'RASTRUCIURB DETERIORATED UNDERGROUND FACn e 19N870G (1,131) REMEIIFNT WTIH ALL MCKBUAY TION TOAVOID OF FA OT RFl.O(:AMDIS FACUJTIFA NSIOMERS WNFL CONFLICTW/PROPOSED REL FACILITIES PROJECT MULTOFSTORM AS AAMULT OF STORM ORADJ 19450060 (103) RETRIBUTITOFFACB.RJFS-RERRE ALL HONEY ftE1TRE RB+RASTRUCNRE DISTRIBUTION PACdII'@4 NSTOLLRiRR3 GROVE 19452366 (147) RETptEt.@NTASSOCIATm WITH ALL FORT WORTH REPLACE SYST@a D.OROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS DRRASIRUCIUIIE DE[ERIORATED UNDERGROUND FAC6TIIE8 19454000 (M7) RETIXEI..INTTIASSOCIATEDWTII! ALL ABB.EFIE REPLACE SYSTEM ]MFROVFSH]PIB-REPLACE CUSTOMERS DIFRAORUC U E 3WFEEIOF3•BARESTSELPfPE WIUI 194546M (394) REl'00E[eEN'1'ASSOCIATm WITH ALL MCKDR4EY RLLOCATIONTOAWM RELOCATIONOFFAMOM- CUSTOMFFS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RMOCATEDISIRERXRONFAW,= PROJECT ASARMULTOFSTRFPT RECONSTRUCTION 1945653G (2340) PEINH.ffNTASSOCIAIID WITkI ALL S101MAN REPLACE SYSTEM]11FROVEMEM4-REPLACE NSTOMERS WFRASTRUCRJRE DETERIORATED IDR)EROROUND FAMITIES 194586M (1,163) RBTIXFt.4NTASSOCIAT®WITH ALL AMSQmS RELOCATTONTOAVOW RE ATTONOFFAMMRS- CUBTOMERB COJBLICIW/PROPOSED RQ ATEDISTUBUOONFACLLTITFS PROJECT ASA RESULT OF ORA W AGE PROJECT I%5995G (116) RE"TIX@.¢11T ASSOCIATIM WITH ALL ROCRDALE REPLACE SYSTFMMPROVEMHfIS-REPLACE CUSMMERS OJFXASTRUCTURE 100 FEETOF4" STEO. PIPE WITH 100 FEET OP 4^ FLAS ICFIPE 19/60110 (J) ASSOCIATED WITH ALL FORTWORTH RpACAT10NTOAVOM RECOCAOONOFFAMOM- CUSfObffR.S CONFLICTW/PROPOS® RELOCATEDL4TR®LITTON FACLLIIIE4 PROJECT ARMULTOFSTORMSEWER CONSTRUCTION 19060930 (4) RhT@Fb4TJI ASSOCIATED WITH ALL DALLAS REPLACE SYSTEM UdFROVE64 s -REPLACE NSTOMIW DIFRASTRUCIURE 150FEETOFIO•WRAPPEDSTEELPPE WIJH 160 PF£I OF 10• SiFF]. PSE 1946I930 (129) RETBtD WITH ALL MCKWJ�Y RFIOCATIONTOAVOID T[04 OF FAMM RELOCAn CUSTOMERS COM11Ci W/PROPOSED REL DIST [BUOOTES- PROJECT MULTIOFR STO$MRR QIMSS AS A RMN.T OF CUSTOMER REQIIFST 1916/310 (62) 1RETBlQ.OJI ABSOCIAT(D WITH ALL GRAND RF3AC nWTOAV RELOCATION Of FACll-OT - CUSTOMERS CONF[Jaw/PROPoSED RELOCATE DIBTR®LITTON FACB.IITES PROJECT ASARESULTOF STREET Page 121 of 155 • 0 • ATMOS ENERGY CORP. MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2DD3 Page 122 of 155 DESCRPTI N orCOMPLE PROJECTS PLACID W GAS UTIUFY PROJECT PLANT DI SERVICE OR RETIRED CUSTOMES NUA®ER COST DURMG 2003 eENF.FRED LOCATION PURPOREOFPROJECF 19/65016 (291) RETBFABNI'ASSOCIATID WRH ALL 6fANSFm,D RELOCATIONTOAVOM RELOCAHONOFFACEJIIFS- CUSTOMERS CONFLICIW/PROPoSED RELOCATEDIS UOONFACD.19ffS PROJECT ASARESULTOFSTREET RECONSTRUMON 19465766 (41) RLTBENENTASSOCN=ouH ALL ROCRDALE REPLACE SYSIEMIMPROVENBNTS-REPLACE CUSTOMEILS WFRASTRUCTURE DEIF]UORATEDUNDERGROUNO FACdITIF_S 19472070 (10) REJBESIDB'TASSOC(A'IED WITH ALL WACO REPLACE REPLACEABNI OF DAMAGED CUSTOA W£RASTRUCNRE FACRRBS 19TR19G (216) RETBEtBTTTA330CIA WITH ALL ADDBON RETIRE DIFRASIRUCNRE REMOVALOFFACRITBS-CAPAND CUSTOMERS ABANDON DMT VOON MAW 19472826 (62) RETBFJ.BNTASSOCIATEDWCH ALL OREENVRLE RELO nONTOAVOB RHLOCATIONOFFACRRIBS- CUSTOMERS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISt MONFAW.T31E3 PROBCf ASA RESULT OF OOVERNbffiTTAL 19475946 (224) ItEIBESBITTA350C1ATED WfIH ALL SAN ANGQ.O RELOCATION TOAVOm RELOCATION OF FACLLITBS- CUSTOMERS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISTRBMONFACRITBS PROJECT ASARFSULTOFCUSTOMER IN75M (316) REM©.BNT ASSOCIATED WITH ALL SNYDER 3J OCAMNTOAVOID RFIOCATIONOFFACRRIFS- NSTOb CONFLICT W/PROPOSED RELOCATE D150 ON FAM= PROJECT A ARESULTOFCUSTOWR T 19476210 (35) REMEMENIASSOCIAIID WITH ALL REELER RELOCATIONTOAVOB RELOGTIONOFFACRITBS- CUSTOMERS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED MOCATEDU BMONFAM ES PROTECT ASA RESULT OF STORM DRA W AOE PROJECT 19476730 (10989) ALL DALLAS RFJATASSOCIATEDWITH nONTOAVOW OCnONO£FACD,RBS- RA CUSTOMERS CONFI=W/PROPOSED OCATEDBTRBMONFACRITIPS PROJECT RESULT OF PAV DTG AND 1942886G (136) RETBB.BNTASSOCIATEDWRH ALL BRYAN RELOCATIONTOAVOE) RELO MONOFFAOLOM- CUSTOMF]t3 CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISTR®MONFACRRBS FROB 194/5810 (366) RETEUTiLMAS60CTAmv= ALL HOAT REPLACE SYSTF MROVEMENR-REPLACE CUSTOMERS P`FRASTRUCIURE DETERIORATED UNDERGROUND FACEJTIES 19486036 (19) RSMELIFNTASSOCIATEDWT151 ALL MVING RFLOCATIONTOAVOB RELOCATION OF FACU.RIES- CUSTOABRS CONFLICTW/PROPoSEO RPDACATEDISTRBMONFACMITBS PROJECT 19486330 (37) REIDtEfrBNTAS50C1ATED WHH All DENTON REPLACE SYST MROVEMEMS-REPLACE CITSTOMERS DJFRASTINCNRE DET(3UORATED UNDERGROUND FAM= 194USIG (67) F3TBENBNTASSOCIATID WITH ALL CARROLLt RELOCATIONTOAVOID RELOCAMONOFFACd1T1US- NSR3AfEA5 CO ICTW/PROPOSED FELOCATBDLSIRIBMONFACRRBS PROJECT ASARESULTOFGOVERNME 19490030 (554) RSIBB.BNTASSOLTAMAM AI -L GRE(R9VRJ.E REPLACE SYSTEM D.iPROVE6B1TT4-REPLACE CUSTOMERS APRASIRUCIURE DETERIORATED UNDERGROUND FACD.iT1E9 Page 122 of 155 • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Pepe 123 of 155 DE ONOF OMPLETED PRO2ECTSPLACEDE9GASUId3TY PBOJECF PL MSM"ORRCTOIED COSIOM NUMBEE COST DeJROIG3003 BENEFITED LOCATION PIBPOSEOFPRO2ELT M9162G (10,063) RETIRELIEM'ASSIX:fATED W[Rf ALL FORT WORM R£lOC nMTOAV00J RELOCATIONOFFACD31¢6- CUSI'ONRRS CONPLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISTR =ONFACbR PROJECT 19495066 (4,027) ItElI1R3.fEM'ASSOCLIIID WITH ALL £ORTWORTH RElO MONMAWW RELO TTMOFFACB.R NSTOF.RRS CONFUCTW/PROPOSED REL MDISTR®IMONFACIL= PRO]ECI MARFSULTOFSIRFbT 1949)390 (111) REITREA43TTASSOCTAmID ALL LEWISV RELO MFACIUIIESDM RELOCATION OF DTSTR® CN CUSTOMERS TO60VERNNSEMAL FAC REQUEST 19497530 (557) REIIRp.OTTAS30CJATED WT[H ALL VALLEY ML MSTALLATIONOR SYSIEMIMPROVEMEM3-REPLACE CUSTOMERS OB QUE REPLACFARNTOF THREYDIRTIU MGU TOR COUNTY) REGULATION E000MENT STATIONS 19498600 (2) RET@ELIEMOFFACR8OP8-REll18E ALL STEPFIONVB.L RETIRE FACd1TTE3 IIIFEETOF2'PLASTICPRE CUsmL E 19499450 (495) REIBtEBffNT ASSOCIATID WITH ALL FORTWORTH RELOGnMMAVOW RELO MONOFFAM=- CUSTOMERS CONFLMW/PROPOSED RFLO MDISTRBU ONFACLLPHFS PR03ECT ASAR TOFSTRFFT 19500616 (3) RElIl3EN1LHTASSOC1ATm WITH ALL A86ENE FORMDnONORSYSTFM DISTALLATIONOFPREAND CIISroMERS pRROVEMEM APPIIItTENANCES -COFL 160 FEE[ OF PLASTICPREro COI4NECf EwsTwG MAD1S 19501306 (9>) REOREMONOSSOCIATEDWI'IH ALL FORT WORTH Rp,TLICF NTOAVOm RELOCATIONOFFACO.I CUSTOMERS CONFLICT WIPROPOSED FA RELOCATEDRTR®VDON FACB.ITIES PROTECT ASARESUL 1950/656 (fig) MS[REET RETNATIONOFFATL WITH ALL DALLAS RELOCAT50NTOAVOD RELOCATIONOFFACdITIFS- CUSTOMERS CON£LICTW/PROPOSED RFLO TION B.I'IIPS FAC PROIECC UTT A9 A RESIRT OF OFSMSTORM SE WER 19508806 (70) RETQtEME19TASSOCTATE-W ALL GEORGECOWN REPLACE 3YSTF VEMEM$ACE CUSTOMERS UJFRASIINCNRE 30 FEET OF V S OF 6' STEEL PRE 19512196 (719) ItE1'BfEM1M1ffIllI ASSOCIATED WITH ALL Mt G RELOCATIONMAVOM RELOCATIONOFFACB3TR3- CUsroM1 CONFLICTWIPROPOSED RELOCATEDMS U IMFACB.ITIES PROJECT ASA RESULT OF GOVERFO.®TTAL WkMT 19513336 (61) REIB1EA03lTASSOCIATIDWfIH ALL BANGER REPLACE SYSTEMARROVISRMS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS WFRASTRUCNRE DEI£AIOMTEDU MGROIMD FACBJTIFS 193124M (818) RETIXEI.fEMASSOCIATEOWTIH ALL FORTWORTH RFT.00ATIONTOAVOM RELOCATIONOFFACB-ITBS- CUSrob CONFI-ICIWIPROPOSED RELOCATE DISTR® ON FACMS PROTECT AS A RESULT OF WATER SEEPAGE 19512706 (397) REIIRETRNTASSOCIATED WRH ALL ABdFI4E REPLACE SYST¢MB.RROVEMEHIS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS WFRASTRUCTURE 2.50FE£TOF4•BARE RE WI01 CPWE 250 PEST OF 4' PLASTIC PRE 19513896 (109) REMAffM'ARSOCIATED WITH ALL ABR.ENE REPLACE SYSTEMDRROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS BRRAS]RUCNRE 599FEETOFCBARESTE MF,JV FEETOFRFLM=PRE,AND31 FEIR OF4'CARTMO PREWITH530FEET OF2-PIASIIC PRE Pepe 123 of 155 • E • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2603 Page 124 of 155 DESCRDTION OF COWUnD PROBECFS PLACED W GAS IFFB.I3Tl PIIOOEC[ PIAN£ W SERVICE OR RE'T D CUSTOMERS NU89ER COST DURWG 30M BENEFT[EO 1A nON PDRPOSEOFPRO3ECT 19514946 (1) RETIXET.fENTASSOCIATIDWITH RPSD3EMIAL SH£RMAN SYSTEMERFAN31ONDUE WSTALLAnT OFPTEA TONSMO GROWTH APPUR'[£TTM'CES 19515006 (33) RETIXETIENTASSOCI =W ALC ABB.ENE REPLACE SYSTEMOTROVEA¢MS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS WFRASTRUCNRE 353 FEE£OFC VRON PTE,59 FEEP OFCTIRONPTE,AND4FEETOF 4'PLASTIC PTE WITH PLASTIC MAWS 19519096 (4) REMFMEFTTASSOCUITID WTM ALL CLYDE REIII{E WFRASTRUC REMOVAL OF FACM=-ABANDON NSTOMFRS 13 FEEFOF 2' WRAPPED STETR. PTE 19518096 (2W) RHIRELfENTASSOC1ATiIDWrtH COAO4ERCW FORTWORTN SYSTEMEEPANSIONDUE WSTALLAMON OF PTE AND TOCUSTOMERGROWTH APPURTENANCES-WSTALL DISTR BMON£A WPFH 19519986 (T) IIETIXmffFTTASSOCIATEDWCDI ALL WAN REPLACE SYSTEM PTROVEMENTS-REPLACE CV8tt1b4R5 WFRASTRUCM(E 10 FEETOF2' S=PTE WITH 10 FEEFOF3'PLAS=c 19530146 (38) REMF1.fENTASSOCIATEDWFFH ALL BONHAM RFPLAC6 SYSTeT4RTROVP REPLACE !'111Tf1\^'n9 WFRgSIRUCNRE DETERIORATED UNDERGROUND AC TA 19530336 (IQ RETBtEAB:NTASSOCIATE-W ALL WA)WSACHIE REPLACG SYSTE OVEMP]4T5 NSTOMERS BVFRASTItUCHIRE 14 FEETOF OF2-Y STEEL PTE WFIH 14 FEETOP 3'PLASDC PTE 19531646 (335) SE<IXEMENIASSOCiATEWITH ALL PALE9TWE REPLACE SYSTFT4R.TR0VENDWT3-REPLACE NSTTIMERS WFRASIItUCNRE DETERIORATED UNDERGROUND FACf11TIE5 19524196 (31) RETIXFMENTASSOCMTED WIFH ALL ABD.ENE REPLACE SYB=OF4''CE MB -REPLACE NSTOhmRS WFRASTRUCFURE 195 FEEL OF 4'CAST ETON PTE 3 FEET OF 4' PLASTIC PIPE WITH 19] 197 1944610 (ST) RETIXD.ME WITH AL1. ALL CL®URNS RELOCATIONT OFSOCIATID RENCATTONOFFACBWFA FA CON£LICTW/PROPOSFD RFJACATEDISIRIBUTION FACRRTSVM PROTECT AS A RESULT OF N VERNMEMn 1953R3O (14) REiRII.O:NF ASSOCIATED WITH ALL ARLWGTON RELOCATWfmT VOm RF1OGTIODBF NSIDMERS CONFLiCTW/PROPOSEO RFIOCAIEDISTRmUHONFACRtfBS U 10NF PROTECT AR A RESULT OF FIXE HYDRANT 194R4O (13) REIIRFAOUGNo OCIATED WFIH RESmEN'ML TERAELL SYSIFME�ANSION dIX WSTALLADON OF PIPEAND TO CUSIOMER6ROW'IH APPURTENANCES- WSFALL TOO FEET OF 3'PLASTIC PTE 19338146 (10) REIiREMEN WFIH ALL BRYAN RELOCATIONTOAVOm OFFCIATED RELOCAIIONOFFACB.RTS- CU$'COFp:RS CONFLICT W/PROPOSED RELOCATE DISIRIBUOON FACRRTS PROTECT ASARESIILT OF STREET 193309'16 (34) REIIXENIENI'ASSOCIATED WTIH ALL HOWE REPLACE SYSTEM PIPROVEMEMS-RFPI.ACE NSTOMERS WFIUSTRUCNRE DETERIORATED UNDERGROUND FACRITT3 1953N36 (135) RETIXFAffNTA5SOC1ATE0 WTIH ALL ROSNE RETBUi DTRASTIIUCHIRfi SYSTEMR2'BV FMS -MEA CUSTOMERS 53 FFETOF 3' BARE STETF. PTEANO 3'BARE STEEI.PTEAND WST£ WSTALL I FOOt OF 3' PLASDC PDB 1 1953N4G (36) REIWII.m4T ASSOCIATED WITH ALL BRYAN REPLACE SYSTEM UTR0VEn4T1I8-REPLACE NSNF WFRASTRUC 30 OFEETOFCBAREEfEE ME Page 124 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 125 of 155 DESORPTION OFC 85 UMD PROJECTS PLACED W GARUTTLITY PROF FL MSMWUORRETWED CUEI08RRS N08RER COSI DURWG MG BENEFTIED IACATION PURPOREOFPRO U 19537946 (9) REI'DIELIDTIASSOCIATED WITH ALL BRYAN REPLACE SYSTEM ONROVENffMS-REPLACE NSTOMERS 0U'RASTRUCNRE 300FEELOF4'BARE=PDE 195WT80 (6077) IIEIDiE1..ffL11'IASSOCIATED WITH ALL SOVIkLLAi(E RELOCAMONTOAVOW RELOCATION OF DISMBUTION CUSTOMERS CONFLICIWRRCDY FACDPSPS STREET PROJECT 19541130 (IR) RETDP84HTASSOCIATFDWIIH ALL COLLEGE REPLACE SYST WFROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS STATION WFRASTRUCIURE 250 FEEF OF 2" S= PIPE 1954123G (469) RETIRELDNTASS MDWRH ALL SANANGELO REPLACE SYSTEM PIPROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMM WFRASTRI3CfURE 364 FEEF OF 2• BARE STEEL PWE WITH 382 FFETOF 2' PLASTIC PPE 19542946 (518) REIDUR.ffNIASSOC MDWIIH ALL MCRWNEY REIACATIONTOAVOW RQACATIONOFFACd1T1E5- CUSTOb coW ICFW/PROPOSED RFLOCATEDISMB=ONFACOPIPR PROTECT AS A RESULT OF PAVEMENT 195N010 (30) RETWES4NIARSOCLITEDW ALL PARIS REPLACE MMMDIIPROVEMENIS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS WFRASTRUCNRE 60FEEFOFCA. MONMAD4WIIR60 FEEF OF PL MC PDE ANDABANWN 19544880 (89) RLTDBES4TiTASSOCIATEDWR31 ALL WWIElLS REPLACE SYSIEI6D.6ROVE6ffM5-REPLACE CUSTONffRS WFRASTRUCTURE b FEEFOF6"BARESTEEI..PRE WITH aFE OF6"PGSTICPIPE 19543476 (333) RElIRES4?'R ASSOCIATED WRN ALL SANANOELO REPLACE SYST 1+ 0VEMPNI$-REPLACR CUSTOMERS OlPRAS]IOICIURE 320FEEFOF4'BARESTEELP WRN 330 FEEF OF 4' PLASTIC PlPE 19546166 (18) REFIXFbOiTASSOCIATFD WCIH ALL WAXAU ME RFLOCATIONTOAVOW RELOCATIONOFFACB.IFIER- NSTOMERS CONFLICFW/PROPOSED AELOGTEDISIRI MONFAC61T168 PROJECT AS AREBULT OF SEWER 19546496 (29) ASSOCIATEDWIRf ALL QUANAB REPLACE SYRTFM B.iPROVEM1ffNFS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS WFRASTINCNAE 92 FEEL OF 6" BARE STEEL PWE WITH 93 FEEL OF 4" PLASTIC PWE 19546510 (3'19) PEMQAENIASSOCIATID WIW ALL QUANAH RELOGHONTOAVOD RELOCATIONOFFACD.ITIE4- CURIOb CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RE3ACATEDISTRMMONFACRTDFS PROFECI ABA RESULT OF GOVE RNhDN 1955MIG (116) RETIXEA4N"IASSOCIATEO WITH ALL DALLAS RELOCATION TO AVOW RELOCATIONOFFACfL=- CUSTOh CONFLICIW/PROPOSED RElOCATEWRTR =ONFACLLR PROJECT AS A RESIRT OF PAV W 0 OPERATIONS 1955M3G (601) RETJREMP SOC UVWTIH ALL TERRELL REPLACE SYSTEMIMPROVEMENTM S -REPLACE C(ISTOh WFRARTRIK.TURE BARE STEEL MA W S AND BERV ICE LWES 19554TG 0,865) REIQtE64OJIASSOCIATEDWOH ALLWIDiF310USE RELOCAITONTOAVOD RELOCATIONOF FACO.Itff_S- CUSTOMERS CONFLICT W/PROPOSED RELOCATEDL4TR B=KFACE.IT�S PROTECT ASARFSVLT OF STREET 19555346 (ISS)RE'IWEMENIASSOCIAT W ALL ImVRD:I-IA REPLACE SYSTEM IMPROVEMFMS-S-REPLACE NSTOM14RS RJFRASTRUCIIIRE 226 FEEL OF 2' STEEL FIFE WTIH2• PLASTIC PIPE 19555596 (1) RETWE FFACR.ITIE9-REIDtE ALL ABILENE RETIXE WPRASTRUCTURE OF2' NSTOMFRS u lm.IOF2'PLASTICPD'&182FEEI OF 1]S•PLASTIC PRE,AND93 FEET OF 2' GSW6 Page 125 of 155 • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 128 of 155 DESCRPPTON OF CO8 PROHMPLACED W GASTROZFY PROSECT PLANTINSERVICEORRETTRED CUSTOMRRS N VIER COSF DURWG20W BENEFITED LOCAITON PURPOSE OF PRO a 1955665G (8) REfBiEMEKSASSOCIATID WITH ALL FORTWORTH RELOCATIONTOAVOM RELO MONOFFACdITi CUStt1MER5 COIffL W/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISTR =ONFACdSTIE4 PROSECT 19558540 (1894) ASSOCNTID WITH ALL DALLAS RdOCATEFACdR DUE RELOCATION OF DMT UOON CUSTOMERS TO 00VERNAff 7A ACB.ITBSS REQUEST 19560306 (5) ftENBFAfENFA5SOCIATEDWRN ALL TEAALE RESIRE DIDRASTRUCIURE REMOVAL OF FACd1TIF3-9rrmP 85 =70MERS FEEF OF 2 -PLASTIC PIPE 19560306 2 REMFAffNFASSOCIATED WRH ALL TEMPLE RETIRE BBRASTRUC REMOVALOFFACdRIES-RETB M CUSTOMERS FEEFOF2-PLASTICPR'E 195W33G (33) RENREAlENT ASS TEDWm ALL DENLSON REPLACE SYST WPROVE81ENIB-REPLACE CUSTOMERS WERASIRUCNRE BAREST MAWS 19560.38E (245) RET1REeffNIASSOCIATIDWfiH ALL DEIWSON REPLACE SYSTEM d@ ROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTONBBiS WFRASTRUCTURE DETERIORATED UNDEROROU FACW 19560686 (247) RESRF2.ID9TASSOCIATEDW ALL W1BT£SBORO REPLACE SYSTBMTMPROVEMENIS-REPLACE CUSTOMFAS R4FRASTINCNRE DE ORATED UNDERGROUND FACBATIFS 19561DM (5) RETIRFhffFR ASSOMTED WTIH ALL WOLFS CITY RFLOCATSONTOAVOW RELOCATION OF FACR3TTES- CUSTOMERS CONFLICFW/PROPOSED RFYOCATEDISTRWUDONFACdIDES PRO= ASA RESULT OF STORM DRA W 19561396 (5) RETIRENiBNTAS50CWTEDWTIH ALL ABdFNE REFRE DD'RASTRIICRIRE REMOVALOFFAM6 -ABANDON CUSTOMERS 77FEELOFCCA MONPW 19562230 (24) RETD2ET.ffNT ASSOCIATED WDH ALL TERRElL REPLACE SYSTEMWPROVEMENTS-REPLACE NSTOMEU WPRASTRUCNRE STEFLMAWS 19561516 (32) RETIXELIENT ASSOCIATED WITH ALL MMUDOR REPLACE SYSTEMd OVEAWNT3-REPLACE CUSTOMERS WFRASTRUCTURR 490 FEPTOF 4 -BARE 5'TEE11. PM, W FEEF OF 3- BARE STEEL. PIPE, AND 20 19NOWO (242) RETTRELWNT ASSOCIATED WTITT ALL ENNIS RETWE DRQ UUCfl3RE REMOVAL OF FAM=S-DIG BELL CUSTOMERS HOLE AND ABANDON DISTRB MON FACER 195,Om (16) RT:TTREMENTASSOCIATEDWRH ALL WHF1 011 REPLACE SYSTEMd1PROVEBfENTS-REPIACE CUSTOMERS T WFRASTRUCTLRIE DETERIORATED UNDERGROUND FAMTT 19563306 (142) RETWAffNTASSOLIATED WFOI ALL MNU.W REPLACE SYSTEMB.iPROVEMEMS-REPLACE CUSTOSdItS WFRASTRUCRIHE 33 FEEF OF V BARE STEEL PIPE, 34 FEETOF4'PLASTICPB AND4FEEF 1956026 (3) REF@ELtENTASSOCIAIIDWITH ALL LOTF RETIRE WFM5IRUCNItE REMOVALOFFACDATff.S-RED " CUSFOMERS FEETOF 4- BARE STEEL PTPB AND 91 FERTOF4' WRAPPEDSTEELPRE 19563696 (378) REfIREMENFASSOCIATED WfTH ALL SEAR REPLACE SYSTEMU.iPROVEadTTFS-REPLACE N5T016ERS BJFRASTRUCTURE M FEEF OF 2' PLASTIC PB'E AND 373 FEEF OF 2' BARE 4IEET. PIPE Page 128 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MIO-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 127 of 155 D ON OF COWUUD PROJECTS PLACm W GA5UTILRY PROJECT PLANTIVSERWCEORRE=D CUST mmEl NUMBER COST DMNG SON BENRFITED LOCAIT084 PURP0.9EOFPROJECT 19563930 (241) RECAENIEMASSOCIATm WICH ALL WAXAHACHP REPLACE SYSTAJAPROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSIT3A1EI45 IVFRASTRUCCURE 2WFEECOFIM'WRAPPEDSTFEL PPEAND40FF£TOF 1.35' FLAS C 1956W7G (5) REIIREMENTASSOCIATm WITH ALL TRIPLE RFPIACE SYS D.PROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTONPRS INFRASIRUCCURE 14F OF2-BARESTEELPIPEWTFN 14 FEET OF 2- PLASTIC PPE 1956/650 (Ij32) RETIXEMENTASSOCIAMWCTH ALL KANO RELOCATIONTOAVOID RELOCATIONOFFAMd - CUSTOMERS CONFLICTW/PROPOSm RELOCATEDISTRIDVIIONFAMOM PROTECT ASARESULTOFCUST MMES UES] 1956/860 (851) REIItAffM'ASSOCIATIDWLIH ALL ROBI4SON REL UONTOAVOW REIA nONOFFAM=S- CUSTOMERS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISTRNUTIONFACRHIES PROTECT ASARESULTOFHIGHWAY 1956695G (137) RETQtEAfENTA550ClATm WAFT ALL WOODWAY REIO MONTOAVOID RFLOCATIONOFFAC6RP8- CUSTOMERS CONFLICTW/PROPOSm RELOCATEDISTRIBUTIONFACd2IE9 PAO]ECT ASA RESULT OF STREET 195674M (70) R6IRE84NTASSOCIATm WITH ALL ROCEWALL RELOC VONTOAVOW RFIOCATIONOFFACDATffS- CUSTOA¢A-4 CONFWCTW/FROPOMD RFLOCATEDISTR MONFACd= PROJECT 19567890 (27) REDREMENTASSOCIATm WITH ALL WH KORO REPLACE SYSTEMDPROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS DPRASTRUCNRE DE=ORAM UNDERGROUND 19SW5G (30) RETIXEMEMMO£FACdR-RECHIE ALL OOUBOE RETItE W£RASTRUC 336 FEET OF 1.25' PLASTIC PIPE CUSTOMERS STATION lm (188) REIIRENIETTASSOCIAMWDH ALL SULPHUR REPLACE SYSTEMDPROVENDWTS-ABANDON CUsm0 SPRMOS UD'RASIRUCI'URE TII FEECOF Y CAST MONPPEAND 134 FEETOF Y BAFESTEFL PPEAND 19568750 (324) RETItEN®4T ASSOCIATED W ALL TAYLOR REPLACE SYS] WPROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS I4FMSTRUC[URE DETERIORATm UNDERGROUND FACdT 19568820 M8) RETIREMENCASSOCIATmW Att DALLAS RELOCADONTOAVOID RELOCATIONOFFACd - CUSTOMERS LONFLICTW/PROPOSm RmO MDISTR MOHFAMOM PROTECT ASA RESULT OF GOV ERM.DNTAL RE I9369740 (89) RENtOAENTASSOCIATEDWTTH ALL SANANGEm REPLACE SYSTEMNEMENTS-REPIACE CUSTOMERS WFRASTRUCIURE 59 FEETOF 3' 3' BABARE STEE1. PPE W[RS 59 FEET OF 3'PLASTICPPE 1950MG 21) RETIXENffNCA5SOCIATFDWRH ALL SNYDER REPLACE SYSTFAIIMPROVENIENTS-REPLACE OJSTDM WFRASTRUCCURE DETFRIORATm UNDERGROUND FACRITIFS 195/0940 (53'0 RETBiEN1El4TAS50CIATEDWCTH ALL GAWESVI,LE REPLACE SYSIF CUSTONffRS DPRASTRUCNRE ORAMUNDE11GRREPLACE DHIPRIORAIm UNDERGROUND FACT TPS 195]13]0 (157) RETIRAPNT ASSOCIATED WITN ALL TEAPLE RELOCAMON AVOID RELOCATION OF NSTONIERS wlp CONFI.ICTW/PROPOSm UTIONFA FACdRPS PROTECT ASAP MTOFR®VTION ASARESULT OFSTREET 195/1290 (6) PBl➢t WITH ALL RICHLANO RONFLIa NROPOSED T[ON OF FCIATID RELOCATIONOFFACIONFA CIATOMERS CONFLICJW/PROPoSm AGATE PROJECT AS TOF STUTIONFACdTTPS AB A RESULTOF STREET Page 127 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DMSION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 128 of 155 DES 014 OF CO PRO3EC15 PLACED W GAS UTRPTY PROSECT PLANT W BERMI OR RETIRED CUSTOMERS NUMBER COST DURWG 306) BENEFITED LOCATION PURPOSEOFPROPECT 195/1650 (45) RETOtEA@!£ASSOCIAIED WFIH AD. BELLMEAD REPLACE SYSTEM I PROVESBEN£B-REPLACE CUSTOMERS OiFRASIRUCNRE 30FEE£ OF 3' BARE STBELPIPE WITIT 30FEETOFYPLASTICPPE 1958570 (MI) RETEIEbIDTTASSOCTATEDWRH ALL BRYAN REPLACE SYSTEMAPROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS BJFRASTRIICfURE 500 FEE£OF W SIF}]. PPE W£TN500 FEEFOF6'PLASTICFPE 1958680 (15,1'8) RESEtE81OTSASSOCB3TEDWHH ALL GRAND RMOCATTONTOAVOID RELO MONOFFACE3TIE4- NSTOMERS plA CONPLICTWIPROPOSEO R60CATEDfSTa[BMONFAMITPS PROSECT MARESULTOFSTREE£ 19574130 (41) RETIXFMERTASSOCIATPD WITH ALL Mt G REPLACE SYSTEM ]MPROVEMEN[S-REPLACE CUSTOMERS RiFRASTIOCNRE 131=10RATED 1M) ROUND FAC6ITTPS 19575410 (2) RETRHS¢NTASSOCi MWTTFI ALL MCO REPLACE SYSTET5]MROVEMDiTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS BPRASTRUCIUBB IDFEETOF 3' STEEL. PPE WRH 10 FEE£OF3'PLASTICPPE 1957MM (2$6) RETMELP]'11'ASSOCIATED WITH ALL MCO REPLACE SYSIF3d 0.5PROVEMENFE-REPLACE CUSTOMERS DSRASTRUCNRE S9FEE£OF2-BARES PPEWTIH 280=OF 2- PLASTIC PPE 19578160 (1) RETIXEI.+RNTASSOC MDWRH ALL HAMLW vwrmx lN£MSTRUCNRE REMOVAL OF FACLLRPS-ABANDON CUSTOMERS BS FEET of 3' WRAPFEO STEEL PPE 19578170 (74) MHIXFMHtT ASSOC MWITH ALL HAMLW REIACATTONMAVOM RELOGTTONOFFACILRPS- CUSTOMERS CONE MWIPROPOSED RFEOCATE DIfi BIB MFACLLTTTFS PROSECT 195/9170 (3) RET@ET L.IQNTABSOCiATEDWTTH ALL EdLEEN RELOCATIONTOAVOM RELOCATTONOFFAM=- NSTO6 CONFLTCFWIFROFOSED RFIO MDISTR =ONFAM= PROSEC£ AS A RESULT OF COARIEIIIC DEVELOPMEM 19579290 (11) iELECOU REPLACE SYSTEM IWROVF3 S -REPLACE NSTOMERS DPRASTRUCTURE DETERTOMM UNDERGROUND FACRITEM 1958M60 (2) RHMBE6md SOCTATED W ALL MCGREOOR REPLACE SYSTIMWPROVENIENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS WR MUC 100FEE£O£YBAREST PPEWITH IWFEE£OF3'MMnCPPE 19591350 (78) RENRENIE)9TASSOCIATFDWRFI ALL BELLhffAD REPLACE SYBTFM] PROVEF4T'IS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS OIFRASTRUCTURE 118FF TOF3' WRAPPEDS=PPE WFTFI 115� OF2'PLASTICPPE 1958P4G ('84) RETOtESfffSFASSOCIATEDWDH ALL GREENVRLE REPLACE SYST I PROVEIA:MS-REPLACE NSIONIER3 MFMSTRUCNRE 175FEEIOF4-BARESTFFS.PPE WPH 175 FEETOF4' PLASTIC PPE 19583870 (Tl9) REMABSEF£ASSOCIA]FD WITH ALL DENTON RMOCATIONTOAVOU) RELOCATION OF FACB.RPS- CUSTOA CONFLIC£WIPMPOMD RELOCATEDTSTR®UTTONFAMITTFS REIEtEAffiNI'ASSOCU'IED WITH PROTECT 19585170 (10) ALL TEEPEE RELOCATONTOAVOM RELOCATTONOFFACB.ITPS- CUSTOMERS CONFLIC£WIPROPOSED RMOCAMDTSTRTBURONFACE.IHES PROIER ASAMMTOFSTREET Page 128 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 129 of 155 DFSCBRIIONOFCO PROJECTS PLACED W GAS TRTLTFY PROJFCF PLA WSERVICEORRETIRED CIISTOAOBs NOAfBER COST DURING 2W3 BENEFRED LOCATION PURPOSEOFPROJECF 19586810 (34) RETBBBBNPASSOCIATEDWFFH ALL ARLDJOTON RF ATDNTOAVOW RELOCAMONOFFACD.ITIFS- CUSTOMERS CONFLICFW/PROPOSED RELGCATEDISFRBUTIONFACB3TES PROJECT ASARFSULTOFSOtEET RECONSTRUCTION 19586830 (T36) HEIBFAPI9'l ASSOCIATID WFFN ALL CALDWELL REPLACE SYSTEMD OVERBMS-REPLACE CUSTOhPRS DIFMSIRUCIURE 100FEEFOF2'BARESTEELPPEV/RR TOO FEEF OF T PLASTIC PPE 1953fl2O (59) REIIRFdPS2PASSOCIATED WRB ALL BROWN WOOD RIPLACE SYSTFMROROVELBMB-REPLACE CUSTOMERS D4F'MSTRUCIURE DEI WRAM UNDMGRd 1958795G (16) RETBEMENTASSGCIATIDWRH ALL DALLAS REPLACE DAMAG® RELOCAT/ONOFDISTR®UIWN CUSION®t5 FACD.ITIE4 FACB3TBS 19588583 (2) ASSOCIATEDWRH ALL MCGREGOR REPLACE SYSTE WROVELffN15-REPLACE CUSTOMERS O ASTRUCNRE 150FEEFOF2'WR KMS] PPE WIJH 150 FEET OF 2' PLASTIC PPE 19589]80 (I) REIBE604TASSOCIATEDWTRI ALL KB,LEEN REPLACE SYSTEMDPROVFMEMS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS DPBASTRUCRIRE 26FEEFOF2'WR KMSTYEI.PPE 19590320 (262) REBtEMENTASSOCIATEDWRIi ALL DALLAS RELGCAEI TOAVGW RETACADONOFFACB.FFIF3- mmNSRS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDIST UTIONFAW.= PROJECT ASA RESULT OF STREEF ATW 19591350 (2) REIBFASEt4FASS0(AATEOWF25I ALL FIARF:EH RELGCATMNTOAVOW RELOCATWNOFFACB.ITIFb- CUSTOMERS HEIGHTS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISTRBUTIONFACe mP9 PROTECP ASA RESULT OF LEAK M MOBB.E HOwvP 1959253G (5) eEFBEt-m4TASSOCIATEOWRB ALL WACO REPLACE SYSItMR.B4tOVIf./ENFS-REPLACE5 CUSTOMEILR BFRASIRUCNRE FEET OF 4- BARE STEEI. PPE W RH5 FEETOF4"PLASTTCP 'REPLACE 1959285G (8,532) RETIRETPNPASSOCIATBDWRB ALL "mm REPLACE SYSFEIALMPROVEMENTS-RFPLACE CUSTOABRS BFRASIINCNRE 394 FEETOF T BARESTEp. PPE V R 394FEETOF2'PLASTICPPE 19592860 (43) REFBU3.4]4TASSOCIATFDWRA ALL mzIl REPLACE SYSTEM OVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS PPMSTRUCNRE 2T3 FEEFOF P BARE STEEL PIPE WIR3 2M FEFTOF P PLASTIC PPE 19593170 (1,868) RETBEAfENT ASSOCIATED WITH ALL DALLAS RML ATIONTOAVOW RELOGDONOFFACD3T1E8- CUSI'OABRS CONFLICCW/PROPOSED RELOCAMDISTRBU ONFAMITPS PROJECF 19593890 (346) REIRQ.ffNT ASSMAM WRN ALL MCKDII4EY RFIOCATMN TO AVOW REIDCATIONOFFACEdIBS- CUSTOMERS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCAMDISTRBUTIONFACD.RPS PROTECT ASAMMTOFSTREEF RECONSTRUCTION 19594180 (5) RETBEMEMASSOCIATEDWFPH ALL DELEON RETIRE DJFRASTRU=RB REMOVALOFFAC9.RBS-ABANDON CUSTOM4F.5 216 FEEF OF 2- PLASTIC PPE 1959457G (15) REIlTBBBNFASSOCIATEOWRR ALL SiBPF1QJVRL REPLACE SYSIEMI PPROVFA>ENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS E WFRASIRUCRIRE 2WFEEIOF2'BARESTEELPPE WRH 26$ FEED OF ISS PLASTIC PPE 19594686 (10) RENtEABMAS5OCIATEDWRH ALL TEM1PLE RULAM SYs3FMPPROVEAIEHI4-REPLACE CUSTORBR9 DIFMSIRUCNRE DETFIUORATED UNDERGROUND FACD.ITIES Page 129 of 155 • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 130 of 155 DESCRIPIT OP owR D FROJECISPLACED FN GAS OTILTfF PROJECT FLANT MSERVICE OR REFIRED w3F095ER5 NDIFIDER COSF DURU1'G 2000 BHiEFIIBD LOCATION FUePOREOFFROJECF M9515G (136) RETBiEb4]JTASSOCIATEDmm ALL GEORGEFOWN RELOCATIONTOAVOID RELOCATIONOFFACMF - CUMOh CONFLICT W/PROPOSED RELOCATBDISTIUBIMONFACLL= PROJECF 19596060 (13) RETIXFMEl9TA550CIATEDWRH ALL WOO 001) MIOM P'FRAS7INCIIJRE REMOVAL OF FACD.F11&S-ABANDON COMG R5 55FEEF01`115'PL MCPPE 19597170 (17) REIWELffiNTASSOCIATEDWDH ALL CORSICANA RELOCATION TO AVOID MI.00ATIONOFFAC6FIIB9- wSTOh CONFLICFW/PROPOSED MI,OCATEDIMRJ3 IONFAMITIES PRO= 19598630 (1,690] REIWEAmVTA5S0[;IATED WI'M ALL CALVERT REPLACE SYSIBM 0.@ROVEJ.1En IS -REPLACE CUSI'OF6ER.S RffRASTRUCMtE 600FEETOFY STEELPM WEIR 600 FEEFOF Y PLASTICPIPE 195WoG (190,612) RETRtENm3FASsOCLATE )mm ALL PFLUGERVB.L RELOCATIONTOAVOM RELOCATIONOFFACD.oM- wSTONIER9 E CONFLICFW/PROPOSED RpOCATEDISTR®IMONFACB,ITIFS PROJECT ASA RESULT OF GOVERM.P;NTAL 196W310 (1,596) RETIRE90.+M'ASSOCIATED WITH ALL FORTWORTN REPLACE SYSTEMD ROVE9ffiMS-REPLACE wsTOMERS DIFMSTRUCFURE 716 FMTOF V STEEL PBE MID MRVICELDiFS WTFH MREEFOFI' 1WIMG (130) REFRtEt4NFA950C1Amwml All WIBTNEY REPLACE SYSTEML OVEMENFS-REPLACE CUSTOM BJFRASTRU=M EFERIORATFD UNDERGROUND FACO Rff5 19601TJO (551) REIIXEL6FITA590CIATED WITH ALL COR.SICANA REPLACE sVSTEM R.BROVE6ffMS-REPLACE wSIDAO]LS WFRASTRUCMIE DR ORATED UNDERGROUND 19601790 (1,119) GROESBECE REPLACE sYsTEMA4ROVEM1RM3-REPLACE CIISTOSSERR.S DIFRASTRUCT(IRE DEIERIORATEDUNDERGROUND 1960Z01G (12) RETIXEOffNI'ASSOCIATED WFIfI ALL OLNEY RFAACE SYSTEMR+PROVE94MS-REPLACE wSTOMERS EVFRASTRUCFIIRE 120 FEETOF 3' PLASTICME 19607310 (510) RETniE1..>EfllTassoClAT®wITN Au ARaENR REPLACE SYsTEMNI?ito MS -ABANDON w5m0 DIFlWmuC 127 FEEFOF 3' BARESTEEL FIPEAND IWOZnG (1) REFBtEMENTASSOCIA7ED WIiH ALL ABB.EFIE REPLACE SYSTEMO.WROVEMENB-REPLACE CfI5FON1ER5 DJFRA RUC 216FEETOF2'BAREST PPDWGH 190FEEFOF 2-PLASTICPIFE 1960360) (110) REMEOffNFASSOCIATID WFIII ALL LEWISVR lF RELOCATEFACD.RIES RELOCATION OF DIMIUEIflFON CUSTORIFRS FAMI= 196M390 (7) �ASSOCIATFDWFIH ALL BELLS RELOCATIWMAVOID RFlOCAT1014OFFACII=- CUSTOA LONFLICFW/PROPOSED RIIOCATEDISTRIBUTIONFAMIT[ES PROIECF ASA RESULT OF GOV0tN6ffii 19 WIG (653) REFQlE6@ITFASSOCIATEDWRN ALL COLEMAN ME TIONTOAVOID RELOCATIONOFFACdFI1F5- CUs'IOMERS CONFLICT W/PROPOSED RELOCATED131R®VIION FACD.FIIES PROIELT 1%05060 (5) 6EFRtE91 m!;OCI UDID ALL DALLAS ULA T10NTOAVOM Ml.O TION OF FA(MITIFS- w53UN WMIRWIPROPOMD R3OCATEDISTR MONFACM= PROJECT 19606000 (31) RETIXELffNTA5SOC1AlED WFIH ALL DALLAS REPLACE SYSFEMD.iPROVE66ENR-REPLACE wSTOMFRB OJFRASTRUCFURE FMTOF6"CASTBFONP@E WFIH "=Of :196 M6' PLASTIC ME 196063FG (21) REIH(FJ.42CIASSOCIATED WFIH ALL EARLY RMOCATIONTOAVOW REL T[ONOFFACdIiDS- wSTOMERB wNFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISTR®UGONFACB.I PROTEGE ASA RESULT OF FASE64NF ISSUES Page 130 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 131 of 155 DE O D PROJECTB PLACED FN GAS UT11dIY PROJECT PLANTD95ERVR:EORRETIRF.D CUSTOMRRS NUMBER COST DURING JON BENEFITED LOCATION PURPOSE OF PROJECF 1960688G (11) REFLQESffNFASSOCIATEOWFIN ALL GADPBVB,LE RFJ9.ACE RELOCATION OF DIS R UTION CUSTOMERS PIFRASIRUCNRE FACRITTFS 1960740G (13) RETIXEARJTASSOCIATEOWITN ALL WACO RELOCATIONTOAVON RELOCATION OF FACRRIFS- CUSTOMERS CONFMCTW/PROPOSED RELOCATBDMTRIBUIIONFACD.TItE9 PROJECT ASARESULTOFSEWER IM9170 (In RETiREMENTASSOCiATED WI'll{ ALL WACO REPLACE SYSTEMOPROVEMENI3-RFPLACB CUSTOMERS OPRASFRUCFTRIE 110 FELT OP2- BARESTEFL POE WON 110 FEETOFr PLASTICPPE 1%08780 (3,645) IXAADW BUFFAO RLOATIONTOAVON OTONOFFAC=- =TOME COIOVaWIROPoS OAEDISTTUBUONFAR PROC AASLTOFGONAL 196N210 (2,660) REIBtEtffNTAS5pC1AlED WRH ALL CADMO S RELOCATIONTOAVOID ATIONOFFACBATIFS- CUSTOMERS CONFLICTWIPROPOSED RELOCATEDISUUBUTIONFAC� PROJECT 19609NO (X) REIIXEI.IDTTASSOCIAIID W[IH ALL SAN ANOELO REPLACE SYS') WFROVEMEN3S-REPLACE COSIOMERS D4FRASTRUCIfJRE W FEETOF 2' RARESTEPL PPE WRR 1960%90 (1N) REMEMENTASSOCIATEDWRH ALL MCCAUIL REPLACE SYS 31,(PROVEMENFS-REPLACE CUSTOMEAS INFRASIRUCRIRE W FI=oF2'BARESTEELPPEw 1%10170 (413) REIIREL4NF ASSOLTATED WEIR AL1 ORFnuvn4F REN(E INFRASRNCRIRB REMOVAL OF FACD.ITIE9-REMOVE CUSTOMERS 116 FPETOF 2' BARE Sh9. PPE 19610]30 (11) RETBtES1MiT ASSOCIATED WRIT AM. WICWTA REPLACE SYSTEM OVEMENTB-REPLACE CUSTOMERS FALLS 1NPRASTRUC 100 FEETOF 4' BARE STEEL PPE WRN 19611170 (40) RETIRFJ.104T ASSOCT mWRH ALL SAN ANGELO REPLACE SYSTEM OPROVQdENTS-REPLACE CUS10A WFRASIItUCNRE 33FEET01`4'13ARES PPEWRB 33 FEET OF 4' PLASTIC PPE 1%11560 (1,021) RETIXFAffN SOCTA'TEDWRIJ ALL IRV020 RELOCATIONTOAVON RELOCATION OF FACIL T - NSTOMERS CONFLICFW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDTSTRIBURONFACd= PROIECF ASARESUT.TOFSTREET MING (389) REFBi£6ff14T ASSOCIATED WITH ALL SANANGFDO RELOCATONTOAVON RELOCATION OF FAMFR - CUSTOMERS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISIRiBUFIWFACOIIPS PROTECT 1%12830 (500) IfE-TIXELNNTASSOCIAIIDWTIN ALL M=A REPLACE SYSTFb1OPROVPMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS FALLS WFRASTRUCIURE I81 FEITOF 2' BARESTl2D. PPE WITH 181 FEITOP 2' PLASTIC PPE 19612940 (14) RETIREAPNTASSOCIATED WRR ALL WAXAHACHO REPLACE SYSTEORAM EMEMS-REPLACE GGSTGMER9 PPRASTRUCTURE DEU]OORATED UNDERGROUND FACB,1'f1ES 196130G (276) REFBi@.7IIa%O SOCIATED WITH ALL POTTSBORO REPLACE SYSIBM O IDJIS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS WFRASTItUCMtE 2 -B 350 Fl £T OFF 2' BARE STET]. PPE 1961301G (9) REIBPADIRASSOCIATEOWRH ALL DELEON REPLACE SYSTEM O1`' ES REPLACE CUSTOMERS MFMSTRUCNRE I%FEDI OF 2 2B WITH TITET3.PPE 191 IFFY OF 2' - PLASTIC PPE 1%ISOSG (109) RERRPT4NCASSOCIAIEDWRH ALL BROWNWOOD REPLACE SYSIFASOPROVEMENIB-REPLACE CUSTOMERS TNFRASTINCNRE W FEET OF 4' CASTIRONPPE WTIB W FP£FOF4'PLASTTCPPE Page 131 of 155 • c • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 132 of 155 DESCR UN OFW PRO3ECTSPLA WGAEUTdTFY PROJECT PL IN SERVICE OR REHUU) CUSTOAfERS NUBIDER COST DURING 3003 BENEFRED LOCATION PURPOSEOFPEOIECT 19614nG (5) REOREMINTOFFACIli -RWW ALL DALLAS RETIXE WFMSTRUCNRE 746FEETOFVCASTMONPPEAND CUSTOA 213 FEET OF 2- BARE STEEL PPE 1%14650 (3,441) RETIXE6fEFTIASSOC1AlED WITH ALL AB6ENE REPLACE SYSTEMDPROVETBSNTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS B9FRASTRUC 20FEETOF 6' BARE STEL PPEAND l0 FEETOF Y BARESTEEL PPE WTII( 20 FEET OF 6' PLASM PPE AND 10 1%15590 (2,029) REnRE6P6ITASSOCNTEDWTH( ALL COLEMAN RELOC TIONTOAVOB) RELOCAnONOFFACO.TTTES- CUSTOEP3LS CON J. W/PROPoSFD RFLOCATEDMMUSMONFACRRPS PROJECT ASAR£SULTOFSTREEF RECONSTRUCDON 1%16390 (1.159) RETIXL.fENTASSOCTATED ALL SAN ANGELO MTALLATION OR SYSTEMB OVE6PMS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS RELACELID6TOF DMTRICTREGULATORSTATTON MEASUREAff6T[OR RwLO a 1%16836 (IB) RET ATEDWTIH ALL BRYAN TIO RLOCAnwtT nON OF FA RE1DCAnONOFFACUATPS- CUSTOMERS CONFLICT W/PROPOSED OMD RELOCATE FACILITPE PROTECT OSMGTIW AT CREEK CROSSBiO 1%16910 (23) SEMH.ffinASSOCIATE- W[IR ALL ABEEF@ REPLACE SYSTEMAPROVE6ID1'ONFR LACE CUS'tUAffRS INFRASTiNCMtE 133FEEFOF4-C WITH nlC 183 FEET OF 4PPEWE 1%17BSG (5) RETIR ALL ENMS REPLACE MON OF WTMUTIOH RELOCnnON OF DISTRIBUTION WSTOMERS B9FRASTRUCIURE FACB.RPS 1%18620 (31) RETWEAIDVTASSCCIATcDWRR ALL AB6EN6 REPLACE RYSIFMRPROVFJ.ffNTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS B9FRASTRUCIURE 193 FEET OF V BARESTEEL PPE WITH 192FEETOF V PLASTIC PPE t%1861(3 (106) RETME6fET1TASSOC MDW ALL ABB.FIP REPLACE 3YnW MPROVE6fEMR-REPLACE NSNMERS OPRASTRUCNRE 365FEETOFPBAUIS PIPEWOH 365 FEET OF T PL MC PPE 1%18990 (5) REl'DtE1.P131'ASSOCIA�ED W[Iti ALL TEMPLE RnUU5 INFRASTRUCTURE REMOVAL OF FAM -ABANDON CUSTOMERS 903 FEETOF 2' BARE STEEL PPEAND 16 FEET OF 2' PLASTIC PPE 19631210 (12) RETIXL.ENS MSOCIATEDWTM ALL DALLAS REPLACE SYSTEMDPROVEMEMS-REPLACER CUSTOMERS DPRASTRUCTURE FEETOFV WRAPPEDnMPPE W1TH7F OF3-PLASI3CPPE 1minG (IAO RENtQ.TENT ASSOCIATED WDH ALL ITAAE.IN REf03E INF'MSTRUCIURE REMOVALOFFAC&1 -ABANDON CUnOMFA3 6 FEET OF 2' BARESTEEL PPE,158 =OF 2- WRAPPEDS= PPE, AND 102FEEIOF2'PLASITCPPE 19524MG (12) REf➢tENENI ASSOCIATED WTIH ALL TEMPLE REPLACE SYSTEM U.PROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOAIER.S OPRASTAUCNRE 19FEETOF2'11AREnEELPPEWITH 20 FEE] OF 2- PLASTIC PPE 196345/0 (156) RETDI}].PNTASSWIAIIDWfIH ALL PARIS REPLACE SYSTEM DPROVEMENIS-REPLACE CUSIONffR.4 DERASTRUCNRE IM FEETOF4-BARE nML PPE W 1%2495G (120) RETIXEIIffNT ASSOCIATED WITH ALL GARLAND REPLACE SYSTEM PPROVE84EM3-REPLACE NSTOEfER.S BPRASTRUCNRE lWFEETOF4' WRAPPEDSTELPPE 1%23G (69) RET➢tEAPTII'ASSOCIAT®WITH ALL BWATA REPLACE SYSTEM PPROVE6IDVI8-REPLACE CUSTOMERS 1NFRASTAL'CNRE 104FEETOFNBARESTELPPE WDH Page 132 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 133 of 155 ER CO PLACED PBO3ECTSPLACEDINGASVTd1'IY PROJECT PIANI'IN SE A8 COST G20(RBEI'@F,D DURWGSOU FNEF BPJRRTIED LOCATION PURPOSEOFPROJECT I96wER 1%26696 (91) REI➢t ALL BURNET RELOC 71ONOFFC]=S-RH NSTOMERS ONFLP7TJONTOAVOD CONFLICTW/PROPOSE) MDIOFFACRlT1E4- RS.00AFE FACdRB3 PRQBCT TOFRBUTION AS A RESULT OF STREEF AECONSTROCIION 1%12356 (US) RE ATID WIIX ALL £RISCO RELOCATWIMPVOD RS.00ATION OF FACR.ITBS- TION OF FA NSTOABRS CONFWPR W/PROPOSm TEDISF PROJECT ASSTOTIONFACR.ITBS AS A RESULT OF STOW SEWER 1962TJ4G (N) 1BT ALL FOSNR�ITA RE.00ATW/MPVOB TIONOFFAIATIDWIIH TEDISFFACR NSTOMERS CONELRT W/PROPOSE) M¢ RELOCATE FA UIIONFACBITffS PROJECF TOFF AS A RESULT OF DRA W AGE DICCH 19618916 (4,197) RETBEI ALL LAKSORT RSACATIONTOAVOD TION OF FA OTES-1}I RELOCATION OF FACR,U'IPS- NSTOMERS CONFMmo=TOPoID S RELOCATE DISIRBUTION FACD.IIIE$ mo=T 19636 (5) STffD Em 2PR0N-ECB NOME MRUN =OFY PEDSMLFM W8EOF2'PLASnCFB 196307I0 (3,010) ALL SAN ANGELO REPLACE SYSTW4NTASSOCIAFSIWTTH EPLACE NSTOMERS WFPASTItUCIURE ISSTEMR.iPROVEM14SMEL 185 FEETOF 6' BARESTEFL PIPE W19'N 185 FEETOF 6' PLASIA PB'E I9630)46 (188) RBTBEI.fEl9TASSOCIATEDW1iH ALL SHERMAN REPLACE SYSTWB.IPROVEMENTS-REPLACE NSTOMER$ WFRASTROCHRtE D]=I DETERIOAATD)UNDFAGROUND FACO R ES 1%3D'J6G (S) NTASSO ALL COPPELL REPLACE SYSTW S -WON SYSTAIR.IPROVFACMIS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS WFRASTRUCIURE UNDEAGROUNDFAC61TB5 i%3%IG (2) REIBS.BNi ASSOCIA'IID WITH ALL ANSON REPLACE SYST3SBROV580PEPLACE9 CUSFOMERS ➢iFRASTRUCNRE FF£TOFOF 3' BARE SIS]. PIPIEBE W[M 9 FEET OF 3"PLAS11CPbE IMBIG (5) REUREARTTASSOCIATS)WITO ALL WACO RfiTffiE WFRASTRUCIURE REBIOVALOFFACR-OBS-RETIRE4 CUSTOMERS FEETOF4' CASTBON PBE 1963281G (1U) RETBFbB3fIASSOCIATED ALL SAN ANGELO REPLACE SYSTWIWROVEM1¢NFS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS WFRASTRUCNRE 120F]=OF 3- BARE S=PW WRH 120FI=OF 3' PLASTIC P I9U295G 0%) RETOUR.BITTASSOCNTE) ALL CAMERON RELOCARONTOAVOD RELOCATIONOFFACdITBS- CUSTOMERS C IUW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISTRBUMONFACRJRc.S PROJECT ASA RESULT OF EXPANSION OF HIOH SCHOOL FACR.RBS 1%36916 (289) RET0iE0ffiFITASSOCIATEDWRH ALL MANSFRID RELOCATIONTOAVOD RELOCATIONOFFACB,IIIFS- CUSTOAfrRS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISIRBUTIONFACB.I3TE5 PROJECT ASARESULTOFNSTOMER UEST 19638UG (U RETOiEM1IDITASSOCIATED WTIH ALL "SON REPLACE SYS IIMPROVEMENIS-REPLACE NSTOMERS WFRASTRUCIURE 118 FEETOF S BARE ETES PBE WITH I18FEEIOF P PLASTIC PM 1961%26 (1) REME.¢ITTASSOCIA=ID ALL ABILSiE RETIRE WFRASTRUCNRE R OVALOFFACLOMS-REMOVE NSTOhffRS DISTRBUOON FACBRBS 1%10%0 (103) REME.ffNTASSOCIATEDWITH ALL MUENSTER REPLACE SYSTEMPO'ROVESffNB-REPLACE NStt3MERS RURAS3RIR'[URE DETERIORATE) 124DMIROUND FACD.ITIES Page 133 of 155 • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID -TE)( DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 134 of 165 DESCRRTION O PROI MPIACED W GASIfIMY PROS PLANT IN SERVICE OR RETIRF-D CU6TOMERS NUMBER COSF DORRiG 2W3 BENEFTIED LOCATION PURPOSEOFPRO3 1961W6C (356) RETR2ENIENTAs5OCIATED WfIH ALL ABEENE REPLACE CUSTOA®IS NPRASTRfICNRE 116TEMR.FVO TIRWREPLACE 116 F EE7 OF d" CAST D4ON PBR AND 191 FEET OF 4• BARE PBEWOH 19610080 (255) RETIXF3.tEI4TASSO(:IAmTEDWITH AI.L ABEENE RBPLACE SYSIE CUSTOMERS OIFRASTRUCITRR 01`4'OVENffNTS-REPLACE 213 FEEL OF 4" BARE $iFffi. PDR W(3H 196/0310 (69) REHREMEM'ASSOCIAT ALL BRYAN REPLACE -BETH sYSDRd D.iVSARIEMR-REPLACE NSTOMERS WFRA.STRUCNRE IW FEEIOFd"BARESTEEI.PPE WITH I SO FEET OF 4"PLASTIC PDR 196/0370 (38,6M) REGI WITH ALL DALLAS RELOCATIONTOAVO03 TIIONOFFCIATED RELOCATION OFFACRP[03$- CUSTONffRS CONFLICT W/PROPo6ED RFtOCATfi DISTRBVIION FACR,ITPS PROJECT AS A RESOLT N' PAV W G OPERATIONS 1%11076 (301) RETIXENID4IASSOCIATEDW ALL A MIM RE%.RCE SYSIEMGOROVEhffiIFS-REPLAM CUSTOMERS DDRASTRUCNRE 236FEEIOFVBARES PDRWITI3 236=01`4"PLASIICP 196413W (%) REIRIE6ID MSOCIAT IMI ALL MARLOd REPLACE SYSTEM ll"ROVEA.QNIs-REPLACE CUSTOMERS RD'MSTRuC DEIERIORAT TD2DERGROUND FACUJTIE6 19611520 (IN) REIRE6ID4TASSOCIATED WITH ALL TEBIR.E RELOCATIONTOAVOW RELOCATIONOFFACR.FF(FS- CUSTOA¢RS CQIMJ TW/PROPOSED RELOCATBDISTRIBUOONFACEITIES PROTECT ASARESULTOFCUST RREQ= 19642586 (622) RETIRE3.4 MSOMMDWITH ALL DNI RFIACATIONTOAVOW RELOCATION OF FACd=- CUSTOMERS CQ?OU IW/PROPOSED R WAMDISOLIRIMONFACII-=S PROMS 19642680 (131) RETREPIDdIASSOCIATBD WIDJ ALL ABu.E1dE REPLACE SYSFFMD.flROVESffN3S-REPLACE C OMERR O@RASTRUCFURE d16 FEEF OF V RARE STFF1 PIPE, 68 FBEIOFVBARES AND6 19643050 (339) RECDiEAIDPIASSOCIATEDWITH ALL A ll. REPLACE SYSTEMBMROVE6ffiMs-REPLACE =OhDR.S O4FMSTRUCTURE 375FEEIOFPC nMMMEWITH 398FEET OF d•CASTHtON P@E 1961 (404) REDAEMENTASSOCIATFD WITH ALL DALLAS REPLACE SYSTEMD OVEMEH3s-REPLACE CUSTOMERS mlR s RUCIURE 165 FEHIOF 6• CASTIRON mEWIIH 222 FEET OF T PLASTIC PIPE 196/3730 (161) RE'[B4F➢fET4T ASSOCIATED WFFR ALL BEDFORD RELOC MFACR.RIE3 RFLOCATIONOFDLSTRIBUTIO)4 CUS[OMERS FACD I 1%151,10 (174) RETTRFJAEM' ASSOCIATED WRH ALL 1WJA3 REPLACE SYSTEM RAPROVEMEHTS-REPLACE CUS1DRffR.4 DJFiUSTRUCIHItE WFEEIOFB'BARESTEELAND20 FEELOF WRAPPED SEF]]. ME WRH 1wiNIO (8) REMELffMA8SOCIATEDWRH ALL PALMER REPLACE SYSTEM D.iPROVEMENT3-RPPLACE CIISTOMER.S OIFMSTRuC I10 FEET OF 1• WRAPPED SIEEEI. P@E WITH IIDFFETI d"PLASTIC PD'B I%51696 (1,508) RENO SSOCMIED WITH MM ALL DALLAS MAP CORRECTIONS WRRECIIONs 011e CUSTOMERS I%5361, (W) RETiREMEl4IMIS IATEDWIIH AIJ. FORTWORTH REPLACE SYSTII MROVEF4NIS-REPLACE C MIW]RS O4FMSTRuC DEIFRIORATFD UNDERGROUND FACEITRS Page 134 of 165 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP.. MID-TEX DIVISION GAS REUABIUTY PROGRAM TARIFF RUNG PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 135 of 155 DEBCR@TION OF OOMPLE PROTECISPLACEDMGAB VIIWiY PeOIP.CI PL TWSERVICEORRETRIED CUSTOMERS NUMBER COBE DURING 2M BENEFITED LOCATION PORPOBE OF PRO3ECF MMM (1,191) RBTR(Eb1DTTASSOCIATEDWTTR ALL GARLAFID REPLACE SYST WROVEMENTS-REPLACE C[RTOLiFRS MFRASTRUCTImc DETETOOMM U.` MGROUND FACRd 1%55336 (585) RETLTE6IQTFASSOCIATEDWTTH ALL WACO RELOCATION TO AVOID RF ANON OF FACO,ITPS- CUSTOMERS CONFLICFW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDTSTR® MFAC8.111ES PROTECT ASAREUTOFNSTOMER OEBF 1%56010 (11098) RETREAIFMTASSOCIATEDWTTH ALL FORTWORTH REPLACE SYBTEMU OVEMOlFS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS MFRASTI(UCNRE DE OMMI MGROUND FACR= 1%56186 (363) IIETIXE1rffI.T ASSOCTAMDU ALL GEORGETOWN REL nG TOAVOM RELOCATIONOFFACD.R5E9- CUSIOLIERB CpNFLICTW/PROPOS RELOCATEDIBTRiBU110NFACB.RPS PROJECT ASA RESULT CF EXPANSION OF 1%5673G (1}49) REfNQ.4ATASSOC1Al1ID WTIH ALL BROWNWOOD REPLACE SYSTEMAPRpVEL¢NTS-ABANDON CUSTOMERS MFRASTRUCNRE 475 FEET OF 6' CAST MON PIPE AND REPLACE249=CF 3' SCREW PPE 1%58010 (98) RETB6EN¢FTI'A950CIATED WITH ALL FORT WORM RELOCATION TO AVOM RELOCATIONOFFACO.TTPS- NSH3MER5 CONFLICTWIPROPOSED RELOCATEpISlR®UTIONFAC61'OES PROTECT 1%58556 (627) REIR ATEDWITH ALL GEOROEIOWN RELOCATION TOPOO =N OF FA RELOGHONOFFACB.TNFA CUSTOMERS CONFLICTWIPROPOSED RELOCATE pISiR®UTfON FACdITPS PR 1%59316 (I05) REIMS WITH ALL WTCMTA TO RELO TOAVORT nONOSSOCNTED RELOCATTONOFFACB.QNfA CUSTOMERS FALLS lA wl CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATE DISTRIBUTION FACLLTIIES PRONTO 19659MO (955) REIWE6PENf ASSOCMTEDWITH ALL SPARMTi RELOlA RELOC CUSTOMDRS WITOAVOID CONFLICTW/PROPOSFD UDJSFFAC NFA RELOCATE DISIRIBUHON FACR,tT1E$ PROJECT 19660/30 (8) REFB WfTH ALL MARBLE RELOCAHONTOAVOID RElOC nomOFFCI CUSTOMIERS FALLS CONFIJCF W/PROPQSED MDISFFACRONFA RELOCATE DISTRIBUTION FACU.RlES PROJECT 196b332G (168) 1✓ETIXEMEMT AbSOC1AlID WfIH MAP ALL ARLINGTON MAP CORRECTIONS CORRECTIONS CUSTOMERS 19663100 (9) RE19tFA4]iTAS50(.-IAl]D WFIH qLL TEMPLE RE[OtE DBRASTRUCIIiRE REMOVAL OF FACLL=l-ABANDON CUSTOMERS 31 FEEL OF V WRAPPED STEPT. PPE AND I.tETFR MSTALLAHON 19663510 (W) RETiREM@TTASSOCTAhDWfIH ALL PALESTINE REPLACE SYSTFMAPROVEMPMIS-REPLACE CUSTOMER$ MFRASTRUCTORE DETEJUORATED NJDEROROU FACn rtmR 1966M80 (4) RET@EbIDVTASSOCLITEDWTTH ALL TFAPLE REPLACE SYSTEMPPROVEMPNIS-REPLACE CUSITJMPR9 MFRASTRUCM(E M8EELTOF3'WRAPPEDSIEEI.PPE W TIH 370 FFJ!P OF 2' PLASTIC PPE 1%65590 (4) RETIREMINTASSOCIAIID WITH COMODRrtei SULPHUR SYSTEM EXPANSION DUE IN TA MONOFPPEAND SPRMGS TOCUSTOM4RGROWTH APPURTENANCES-MSTALL 19666340 (1) RETIAFA4NI ASSOCIATm W[IN MAP ALL GOLDIHWAR MAP CORRECTIONS CORRECTIONS CUSTOMERS E (2) RETUIEME]fT ASSOCIATID WITH ALL BRUCEVR.LE RELOCAHONTOAVOm RELOCATIONOFFACB3I¢S- CUSRJM EDDY CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISTR®UTTONFACB= PROJECT ATCREFECROSSDIO E19666N0 19666936 (293) RETTRFb4TTTASSOCTAIEDW1I31MAP ALL DALLAS MAPCORRECIIONS CORRECTIONS CUSTOMERS Page 135 of 155 t • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 138 W 155 ➢ ON OF PRO2EC55 PLACED )N GAS IFIH.FI'Y PROTECT PLANT BI SERVSCEORAETDtEO COSTOMEAS COST DURBlG20N BENEE3TED LOCATION PURPOSE OFPROIECF 19663%0 lmB (I6) SEPBt BSOCIA WITH ALL DALLAS REPLACE SYSTEM AWPROIPROVEh¢NIS-RETLACE9 CUSTDAffRS P'FRASiRUCNRE FEET OF 13' WRAPPED STEL POE 19668000 (WI) REFIRENIQITASSOCVTBDWRHMAP ALL FORT WORTH MAPCORRECTIONS CORR3iCT1ONS CUSTOCQRS 1966811G (1,016) REIIXENIENTASSOCIATFD ALL DENLSON REPLACE SYSFEM OVEMENI3-REPLACE CUSTOMERS DIFMSIRUC 330FEEI OF Y SIEF2-POE WFIH 330 FFETOF3'PIASTICPOE 1%68680 (4) REIWEMENTASSOCIATLU ALL ENVIRONS REPLACE SYSIFMRAPROVEMENIE-REPLACE CUSTOMERS BOFRASTRUCIURE 15FEE[0F2-BARESTEELPOE WRH 15 FFEF OF S PLASTIC POE 1%70340 (5) RETREM1IDiTASSOCLAIFD WFFR ALL C OLLTON REI.O( nONTOAVOM RELO MONOFFACdR - CUSTOMERS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELO MDISTR® ONFACLLFITE4 PRO= 1%70750 (9) ItETIXEMEBF(ASSOCIAIID WRFI MAP ALL SAMA MO MAP OUIUU=ONS CORRECTIONS CUSTOAffRS 1%30900 (3) REFIREI.ffiNTASSOCIATIDWITN ALL a TON REPLACE SYSTEM ROVEMENI$-REPLACE2 CIISTOAfER3 AORASTRUCFI3RE FEET OF 6" BARE STFF]. POE AND CHANGE OUT CITY GATE STATION 1%72330 (38) REFIREL1E11TASSOCIATEDWRHMAP ALL COLLEGE MAPCONtEC310NS CORRECTIONS CUSTOMERS STATION 1%7M00 (495) RETREhaNFASSOCIATEDWFITi ALL SAN ANGMO REPLACE SYSTEMOOROVEMENIS-REPLACE CUS70MERS DJFMSIRIICNRE 327FEEFOF 3' BARE STEEL. POE WDB 1%74720 (69) REIRObONFASSOCIATE➢WRH ALL EMLMORO REPWCQ SYSTEMOOROVEMENTS-REPLACE NSTOAffJtS DhRASTRUCNRE DEIFRIORAIED UNDERGROUND 1%39%0 l%D REFRE84NIASSOC UDWRB ALL SANANGELO REPLACE SYSTFMAOROVEMENIS-REPLACE CUSTONffR3 WFRASTRUCIIIRE 214FEEFOFY BARE STEEL POB WRH 214E OF3'PLASOCPIPE 1%35840 (22) REIWENOHTASSOC MDWITH ALL COLLEGE REPLACE SYSIFMEIOROVEMEMS-REPLACE CUSTOh STATION WFRASTRUCITBU3 IWFEE OF3'SIFEI.POE 1%75160 (3161 REFBiEMFNI'ASSOCIATIDWITH Att BRYAN REIIXE WFRASTRUCNRE REMOVAL OF FA�-A15ANpDN CUSTOMERS 300FEETOF V BARE STEEL POE 19675%G (1.333) REf➢IE6ffNTASSOCIATED WIT}i ALL SAN ANGELO REPLACE SYST WPROVQ.BiN'IS-REPLAM CUSTOMERS DIFMSIRUCITRU3 720E OF3'BARESTEELPOEWRH 7%FEEF OF 2' PLASTIC POE 1%36130 (214) RE(BIENffNFASSOCI MD ALL mV RFI.00ATIONTOAVOm RELOCATIONOFFACB.1'TOS- CUSTOMERS CONFLICF W/PROPOSED RF3ACA'1E33L51RB3UHONFACB.FDFS PROSECT ASAR MTOFGOVETWEffN 1%7197G (41) RE1BtEAB2TTA5SOCIAIFDWF03 AL1 WOODWAY RELOCATIONTOAV RELOCATION OF FACH. - CUS70MERS CONFWC(WIPROPOSm RELO MDISIR® ONFAMOM PROSECT IASAMMTOFOOV ERNTIEB 1%38536 (3%) REMEMENTASSOCIA'IID WFIN ALL SANANOEl.O AEPLACB SYSTFla0.4-BV fEMS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS BOMSIRUCNRE OF /' BARE E Ofi AND PIPE IH OF RESnCPL E 31 111 11 FEEL OF 9"PLASTC POE ATB)TII OFF- Page 138 W 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 20U3 Page 137 of 155 D ONO TED PROJECTSPLACEDWGASBHILTTY PROJECT PLANE W SFJ WE ORRETTRED CUSJOMER9 N ER COST DURWG 2063 BENEFITED LOCATION PURPOSEOFPROJECP (671) REIWEMFATASSOCIAmID ALL BECTON RELOCATION ro AVOID RELOCATION OF FACLLi - CUSNMFRS CONFLIRW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISTR®VIIONFACD.JTTRS PROJECT ASARESULTOFSTREEF REC011STRUCIJON 19631390 (5) REIWffi-fENTOFFAC61-RETRJE ALL DALLAS RETIRE 1NFRASIRUCNRE 30FESTOF3'WRAPPEDSTEEL. CUSTOS 196921IG (3%) RETIR£bffl!!]'ASSOCIATED WITH ALL DALLAB RELOCATIONTOAVOM RELOCATKWOFFAMI=- CUSIOMER9 COWTlaw/PROP RELOCATEDISTR WIMFACU.HWS PROJECT AS A RESULT OF SHALLOW MADS I%82306 (92) REI'OtEAmtl'ASSOCUTED WITH ALL BECTON RELOCATIONro AVOID RpACATTONOFFACDJTlR4- CUSTOMERS CoN CTW/P msm RELOCATEDISTR MONFAMITffS PROJECT ASARESULTOFSTRREIPROJECI I%3243G (4,713) RETIRE81ElTIASSOCIATIDWFOT ALL CgDDOMUJS RFlOCAT10NTOAVOID RELOCATKWOFFACD.HIES- CUSTOMERS CONFGCTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDIS=L)TIONFACILiT1E$ PROJECT 1%83186 (449) RETME8IENTOFFACDATIES-RBIIRE ALL DALLAS REJIXEff1FRASiRuC 325FEEJ01F4'CASTMONPPE CIiSroMER.S 1%89240 (1,362) REIBtEMEN'I ASSOCIATID WITH ALL FORTWORTH RELOCATKWMAVOW RFLOCATIONOFFACB.RPS- CUSTOMPRS CONFI.ICTW/PROPoSm RPI TEDLSTR® ONFACd= PROJECF AS A MULT OF S[REEI 1968%IG (149) REfIRFlfEi3'TASSOCIAIID WITH ALL SANANGELO REPLACE SYSTEWBRROVESSNTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS OJFRASTRUCNRE 122 FEED O]Fr BARE SLID. PM WTIH 122� Ur PW6TICP@ IWW386 (1) REJDtEt I.QNTOFFACILITIFS-RBJIRE ALL DALLAS REIDtE WFRASTRUC SOOFLETOF4'CASTRONPTPE CUSTOMERS 1%91056 (49) BETMEM1DN'IASSOCIATID WRH ALL SHERM1NN REPLACE SYSIEMD OVFAfENIS-REPLACE CUSTOSmtS INFRASJRUCIURE DEIFBIORATED UNDERGROUND FACD.ITIES 1%91320 (2) REI1REBmVTASSOCIAmID ALL COLE REPLACE SVSTEMH.BROVEMPNTS-REPLACE CUsmR WFRASIRUC 230E OFTBARESLID.PIPEW NO FEED OF 2" PLASITC PIPE 1%9182G (12) REIWENENTASSOCIAIIDWHH ALL WA):AHACHW REPLACE SYSTEM[MENiS-AEPLACE CUSroMERS PPRASIRUCNRE 112 FEEL OFFIM'1.26' S= PIPE WIIN 112 FEET OF 2'PLA5OC PJPE i%92910 (19) RETJRETI TMSWMTIDWRHMAP ALL DALLAS MAP CORRECTIONS CORRECDONS CUSmM 1%94120 (1) REfIREAffNTASSOC1AlID WfIH ALL WA%AHAC RFI TIONTOAVOM RFIOCATIONOFFAMLL - CUSTOMERS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISIR BMMFACLLII PROJECT ASARESULTOFMANHOLE RFPLACFJ.ffN'1' 1%91M0 (in) REMFAtEt.TAS50C1ATED WRH ALL SANANGELO REPLACE SYSTEM D.PROVEIAENJS-REPLACE CUSroNiFPR WFMSIRUCRHtE 260 FEETOF 2' BARE STEEL PTE WHN Page 137 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 138 of 155 DES(IRIPFTON OF COMP Pll() C S PLACED W GAS UTRPEY PRO]P.CT PLANTINSF3WMORRET3RED CUSTOMERS NUMBER COST BUIUNGfOM BENEFTTED LOCATION PURPOSE OF PROTECT 196%310 (1,076) RE11RE6ID.TASSOCIATFDWIIH ALL CLBTON REPLACE SYSTIIAIMPROVEMENTB-REPLACE C 01&RS INFRASTRUC 31 FEEL OF 3' BARE STEEL PR'E WITH 31 FEET OF 3' MASMCPIPE I%94330 (3W) RFTRiENDNIASSOCUTIDWITH ALL SAFI NOaO REPLACE SYSTEM D.B'ROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMFFS PIFRAS'IRUCNRE 165 FEEF OF 6"BARE STEEL PB'E WITH 19697610 (T)RETR2ELffHTASSOCWTF- WITH ALL WNBffI'A REPLACE SYSTEML54ROVBMM REPLACE CUSTOMERS FALLS OJFRASTRUCNRE 40FEETOF2'BAREsTEELPB'E WITH 4DFEEf OF TPLASEIC PB•E 19694T30 (33) RE.0 P.LI. 1RVWG RELOCawll TITITASSA:=MS-FH RFLOCAMl)] TACBMFA CUSTOMERS OAP CONFLICIW/PROPOSED REIACAT£DISTRB3UTION FACB.IIBiS PRORiC[ AS A RESULT OF STORM DRAIN 19694780 (M) RETBtE816F1TASSOCIATID WRH ALL ABII.ENE REPLACE 3YSIEM B.i ENTS- REPLACE CUSTOMERS 08FRASERUCTIR3E 19805180 (5) RETiREMENTASSOASSOCIATED WITH ALL COASICANA REPLACE SYSIFMR.IPROVFN TS -REPLACE CUSTOFftRS WFRASTRUCRIRE DEIERIORAIIDUNDERGROUND ACR DSS 1%%7IG (501) RETBUB.IEMFASSOCIAT IH ALL CORSICANA REPLACE SYSIQd R.BPROVEMENTS-REPLACE CIISTONffRS INFRASTRUCNRE ORATED UNDERGROUND FACB.ITRS FACII DWACO R= E B9FRASTRU(=E OVAL OF FACB.ITIFS-BETBIE S] CUSTOMERST OF IT CAST R[ ON P@$ 686 FEELV IT CAST BION PIPE, 40 FEET OF 4' MON FIFE, 150 FEEL OF 196%956 (3) ASSOCIATED WDH ALL CAMERON REIOCATIONTOAVOB) nON OF FA=[IM- EI)ISTRIBUMONFAC CUSTOMERS CONFLICT W/PROPOSED = PRO3ELT 1%99960 (9) REIIXE64]9TASSDC MWRH ALL ALBANY REPLACE SYSTAT OVEMENTS-REPLACQ CUSTOMERS DR'MSERUCNRE %FEET OF T BARE STEIl P@E WITH 19MDIG (61) REIWE64NTASSOCIATEDWITN ALL SANANGELO REPLACE SYSTFM0. OVED9F3TI5-REPLACE CUSTOMERS RR'RASTRUCNPE QFENTOF3'BARESTEEL.PB WITH W FEELOF3-PLASTICPIPE 19RO410 (4) RLTR2FMFNT ASSOCIATED WITH ALL IBR4IUEITA REPLACE SYST IWROVEMENIB-REPLACER MM10LERS WFRASTRUC FEET01`2'BARESTFE1.PME 19]022]0 (122) RFTRUTffNi'ASSOCIAIIDWI'IH ALL GLENROSE RFLOCATIO14MAVOR) RELOCATIONOFFA(=OES- CUSTOM1M1tERS CONFLICIW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISTRB =ON FACR.ITIF3 PROTECT 19R125W (198) REDRFAIEP`TASSOCIA]EDWHH ALL WCf1ARDSON RFlOCAT10NTOAVOB) REIACATIONOFFAMIEEM- CUSIOAffR3 CONFLICIW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDLSTR®UTION FACHITIES PR03ECI ASARESULTOFE MSIONOFHWH SCHOOL FACO.ITIES 19203380 (6) RETRtEI.fl:NTASSOCIATFDWTIH ALL ABB.ENE R ACE SYSTE61 MROVEMENIS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS R4FR MUC 68 FEEL OF 4- CAST BION PIPE AN016 FI=01`4"BARESIEEI.I`MEW M 19105020 (1) RETa1E61EF]l ASSOCLITEDW ALL FBLLSBORO RELOCATEFACRIIffSDUE RELOCATIONOFDISi IXOON CUSTOMERS TO GOVERNMEMAL FACII=MS REQUEST 18006040 (356) RECBtELfr34T ASSOCMTFDWHH ALL LEWISV E RFSACADONTOAVOW RELOCATION OF FACB.ITMS- LRISIOI+EIMS CONFl WIPROPOSEO RELOCATE DLSIAIBUTIONFACB. PR03ECI AS A RESULT OF GOV FRM.ffliTAL Page 138 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2D03 Page 139 of 155 DESCRD'1lONOFC NPLETED PROb:CF&PLACED W GAS OTD.IIV PRO m PLANTBI3ERVICRORRRTwD CU6TTIm NUAIRER COST DUMNG IOOl BENEFITED LOCATION PURPOSEOFPROTF.LT 19'/OTf20 (116) REItItFlffNTASSOCIATED WfIB ALL WACO REPLACE SYSTFA ROVEMENTB-REPLACE CUSTOAffR-S WFRASTRUCTUM 1OF BARE STEEL PBE WT03 1220 0=£EET OF V 4• PLASTIC PB'E 19/08410 (145) RETDtEAID1FA5SOCIATEDWTM ALL SANANGELO REFIRE OGT(ASTRUCTURE REMOVAL OF FACB.IT�.9-ABAEB)ON CUSTOMERS e1FP.ETOF2'WRAPPEDSTeT FL A MFEETOFVWRAPPEDPB'E 19NN7G (38) REFfRENffT9TA5SOCNTEDWIIN ALL SANANGMO RELOCATTONTOAVOID RELOCATIONOFFACB.ITIES- CUSTOMERS CONFLICFW/PROPOSED RII TEDISTRIBUTIONFACILI'ITF.$ PROTECT ASA RESULT OF EXPANSION OF UNI V EIL9TYFACD.ITIEB 19N0250 (4) REIIREM1frNTASSOCIATID WTIH ALL MORAN REPLACE SYSTE 1O 0VEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS MRASIRUCIURE 98FESTOF2-BARES P@ WRR 98 FEETOF T PLASTIC I R 19110256 (5) RETBUP.iFNTAS30C1ATGD WFCH ALL WAXARACNIE REPLACE SYSTEM PIPROVFAfENT3-AEPLACE4 CUSTOMCAS INFRASTRUCTURE FEET0F2'STEELPIPEWTM4FEET OF2-PLASTIC PIPE 1911029G (28) RETB2EfffNT ASSOCIATED WTTB ALL WATAUGA RELOCATEFAMJ DUE RELOCATION OF O6TR®U110N CUSTOM TO GOVERNMENTAL TAM= REQUEST 192109/6 (893) IU;TIXEMQ9T ASSOCMTED WTM ALL SHERMAN REPLACE SYSTEMIAtPROVEAffNTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS P'FRASTRUCTURE DLlERIORAMU MGROUND FACBATIES 19111410 (116) REIIREMENTASSOCIATEDWTM ALL CISCO REPLACE SYSTEM LIOROVEMEMS-RFFLACE CUS'[ON1ER3 G9FRASTRUCIURE 100FEETOF4•WRAPPm SIEF1PIPE 19J1160(3 (23) REIIRE6413TASSOCIATEDWTM ALL CORMCANA REPLACE SYSTEM OVENIDRS-REPLACE CUSTOM1fERS BRFRASTRUCNRE DETERIORATED UNDERGROUND FACILITIES 13/11630 (17) REIiRQ.fftiT ASSOCIATEDWTIH ALL CORSICANA REPLACE SYSTPMIMPROVESfEeITS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS DiFRASTRUC(URE DETERIORATEDUNDERGROUI FAMRIES 1WI1180 (14) M:IBtELiF1RTASSOCIATIDWITN ALL DENISON REPLACE SYSTEMNMROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS D2FRASTRUC DETERIORATEDUNDFRGROUND TACILFIIES 19114260 (2) REIRENfENTA350(:GTEDWIIN ALL ELLS NOTT REPLACE SYSTEM D. B'ROVFMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS INFRASTRUCTURE 100FEET0F2•BARESTEF2.PIPE WTTN 105 FEET OF 2- PSwSDC PIPE IVIVOG (5) REiIREI.BiM ASSOCIATED WTTN AL1 BROWNWOOD REPLACE SYSTENIB.iPROVEMENT3-REPLACE CUSTOMERS DRFMSIRIICIf1RE 81FEET0F 4' CAST BION MAINS WTTE 81 FEET OF 4- MASTIC PIPE 19115316 (155) RETB2Ft ff:TlTASSOC1ATeD WTIH ALL LEWISV LE RELOCATEFACBFISES RELOCATION OF DISTROUTION CUSTOABiR-S FACB.ITIES 191151/6 (18) RESIRFA4MFASSOCATEDWTM ALL L@AN REI'BIE NTRASTRUCTUM REMOVALOFFACRIIIE.S-ABANDON CUSTOMERS IWMTOF 2' BARE SSEFI. P@ Page 139 of 155 G • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 140 of 155 ...ON OF COW�MD PROJECTS CEDMGASUTWTY PRQIGCf PL WSERVTCEORRE2IRED COSF(NAERS NUBBEH COST DU G2003 BENEFTIED LOCAnON PURPOSE OF PROJECT 19]16096 (4.438) RETBLAffN SOCIATIMW ALL LANCASTER RELOCAnON TO AVOM RELOCAnONOFFACLLR - C MfAERS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RdOCATEDISIR®VIION FAW.Rff3 PROJECT 191189]0 (110) RETIXE6RCTTASSOCULTEDWRH ALL SAN ANGMO REPLACE SYSTFMDPROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS D9FRASTRUCIURE 160 FEED OF 2' BARE STEEL PIPE W 160 FEET OF 2" PLASTIC PPE 19)19110 (5) REIIREMEMASSOCNTED WHH ALL SAN ANGPIO REPLACE SYSTEM E9PROVEMENT$-REPLACE CUST WRS BiFRASIRUCNRE UNDEROROUNDFACD.DPS 19T2006G (4N) RETB1E616YTASSOCIATEDWITN ALL BRYAN REPLACE SYSTFAID.PROVE64NF5-REPLACE CUSTOMERS 6iFRA5[RUC[URE 660FF£FOF2'SIE ME 19]20580 (4,956) IIETIREMEN'TASSOCWIPD WI]H ALL CEDARPARR RPD.O ONTOAVOD RELOCAMNOFFAC6IT@S- CUSNN13A5 CONFLICTW/P MMD RELOCATE DISTR®UnON FAN.F1'�S PRO>FLT' 19R11]O (1,111) REIDtEb1E6RAS50CIATFD WTIH ALL BURNET RELOGTIONTOAVGm RELOCAnONOFFA�- CUSTOMERS CONA.ICTW/PROPOSED RFJ.00ATEDMMBUDONFACD IM PROJECT ASA RESULT OF STREET PROJECT 1981606 O.M) RE1'BtENfEN'1'ASSOCLITFD WRH ALJ. FORT WORTH RELOCAnONTOAVOD RELOCATTONOFFAMITIM- CUSTONDRS COMA W/FROP R OCATEDISTRBMONFAMMES PROJECT IM91G (14) REUREMENTASSOCIACIDWTDI ALL DALLAS RELOCATIONTOAVOM REL MON OF FAM=- CUSSONIERS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDiST "ONFACR-RPS PROSECT ASA RESULT OF DRADJAGE PROJECT 1986816 (520) RETDBERiENTASSOCIACIDWTTH COM66ERCW- BIIRTIliI RELOC MONTOAVOM RE MONOFFACE.RPS- CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDl5MB IIONFACH= PROJECT ASA RESULT OF COMNPRCIAL 19 10 (590) RFIWEA@TT ASSOCIATED WAH ALL AT S RELOCATIONTOAVOW RFL UONOFFACD1nE5- CUSTOMERS CONFL[CTW/PROPOSED RETACAMDISDt®UHONFAC6 PROSECT ASA RESULT OF OOVFRM4ENTAL 19nslla (8) REIRFA4 MSOCMM WITH ALL PITINAM REPLACE SYSTFAOF2'B E6lEME-REPLACE CUSTOMERS DPRASTRUC!(IRE 67FEETOF2'BARESTEELPPE WITH 67 FEEL OF 2" PLASTIC PPE 1988136 (5) RETDIFME19TA550C1ATEDWOH ALL BAIRD REPLACE SYSTEM DPROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSNMERS WFRASIRUCNRE 140FERTOF3'BARESTEFW[H{ 140 FEETOF 2' PLASnC PPEE 19732430 (119) RE-(QtEM1@Ni ASSOCIATED WTIH ALL WACO REPLACE SYSTF ROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOEIERS INFMSTRU=aS 112=OF 4' BARE 5TEEL PPE WUH lzo FEEroF 4' PLAsncPPE 19n410G (22])RETIR WDH ALL SIEPI@JVdL REPLACE IWROSSOCIATFD SYSTFMB.SPROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS E PIFRASTRUCNRE 240FEETOFBARESCID.PPE WIIN 210 FEET OF C 4' PLASnC APE 1973/636 (29) SET61FMn4TA530C1A'(F-W ALL AB6ENE REPLACE SYSTE E -REPLACE CUSTOAffRS 09FMSTRUCIIIRE 122 FEET OF 4' BARE SIID. PPE, B9 OF4--BARE FEET OF 4"CASTDtONP ]FEET OF 19]360]6 (131) REAR ASSOCIATED WITH ALL SANMOM TTONTOA VOUD RELO nON - CUSTOMERS 00C 1 CONFLICTWJPROPOSID MDISFFAC ONO SEDIS PROJECT 19!37886 (351) swmTONFACB,Ii�S RETDtFA4Dn ASSOCIATED WTIH ALL SAN ANGELO REPLACE S88=OF4'B 4N'1'S-REE NSTONffRS INFRASTRUCTURE 288 FEET OF 4' BARE STEEL PPE Wf[H LBFEETO A 19]J]NG DS N f0f4 FA M]TIM OF ALL DALLAS R£IIXE DPRASIRUCIURE MONMRETIXE 265 FEET OF 6'CAST)RON PPE 265 CUSTOMERS Page 140 of 155 • • G ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 141 of 155 DESCRIPTION OF COMPLETED PROh PLACED IN GAS UTIdTY PR05ECT PLANT IN SERVICE OR RETIRED CUSTOMERS N ER COST DURING MO BENEF LOCATION PURPOSEOFPROSECT 19TSSOTG (14) RETUNEMENTASSOCIATEDWTIN ALL DALLAS FLIP CORRECTIONS CORRECTIONS CUSTOMERS 19T3980G (5) REIRQ.ffMTA$SOCIATED WTTN ALL DALLAS REIIXE WFRASJRUCIURE REMOVA OFFACMMES-RETIXE78 CUSTOMERS FEETOFY WRAPPEDSTEELPIPE 19]39950 (5) � ASSOCIATED WTTH ALL ABMENE RETRE DNFRASTRUC REMOVALOFFACU.ITJES-ABANDON CUSTOMERS 315FEETOF WRAPPEDSIFT4 M 1940130 (161) REIIRESIENTASSOCIATEDWITHMAP ALL COLLEOE MAPCORRECI]ONS CORRECOONS CUSTOMERS STATION IWQ55G (2) RETGNENffi4TASSOCIATEDW ALL BRYAN RELOCAIONTOAVCSD RFLOCATIONOFFACBALIFR- CUSTO� CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATE DISTR®UIONFACLLITIES PROSECT ASARESOFSTREEf RECOINSTRItUCITON 19140870 R'D) RETIXEMENi ASSOCNTEO WITH ALL SAN ANGELO REPLACE SYSTEI CUSTOMERS DR"RASTRUCNRE OF3- ARESTELPMEACE 180FEETOFS'BA WITH 180 FEET OF 3• PLASTIC PG'E ST[C E 194238G (2) RSTIXFLffINT OFFACE.1TffS-RETpIB ALL DALLAS RBTIXE UNFMSIRUCCUIRE 27DFEETOF4•CASTIRONPG'EAHDTS CUSTOA FEETOF2• WRAPFEDSTEELPWE 19M2TTG (IA) REI9IEF10JT ASSOCIATED WITH ALL TAYLOR REPLACE SYSTEM ROVEFiEITTS-REPLACE ERA= CUSTOMERS GNFRASTRUCIURE UNDEROROUND 1945150 (P) REITREFIDN)ASSOCIATEDWITH AL1 DALLAS REPLACE SYSTEMI ROVEFIRTS-REPLACE NSTOF WFRASTRUCTUM 100 FEET OF 2• STEEL PH'E WTIN 102 F oF2'PLASTICPIE 19]45M (11) RETItII4EN'TASSOCIATED WITH ALL BONHAM REPLACE RELOCATIONOFDISTRIBUION CUSTOMERS UORASTRUCIURE FAMMES 19745990 (2 46) AETGtFA4lNTA3SOCIATED WITH ALL LONGV RELOCATION TO AVOW RELOCATIONOFFACD.ITIF.S- CVSTOMFRS (GREGO CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDI BUIONFAMMES COUNTY) PROTECT AS A RESULT W' GOVERNMENTAL 19)46010 (302) RET@ WITH ALL DBVGNG RELOCATW/mPVOG) T[ONOFFCIATED RET.00ATEDISMACD.TNFA CUS[OFffRS CONFLICTW/PROPoSED RELOGTEDISTRIBllT10NFACD.1'IES PRONTO 19]46020 (2,128) IT[ONOF0CIATED WITH ALL LONGVDiW RomlaIONTOAVOID HZLO RELOCATEDISMAU7HONFA CUSTOMERS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RFLOG FAC6ITIES COUNTY) COUNTY) PROIER TOFRU3UTION ASA RESULT OF GOVFStTA¢NTAL IREQUEST 197I686G (152) AL DERON AC SYF -AC COff RUCIUE DONATEUNDERG0.0UND 19]4]180 (I) NTOFFACM N AL ABDffi REIIE RSTRUCTURE DISMBUTON FAITES CIISIOMERS 1949520 (62) Rk-T'RtE60DO'ASSOCIATED WRH ALL DETIURT RELOCARONTO AVOM RELOCATIONOFFACRTIEE- CUSTOMERS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATE OISTR®UIION FACdfTOSS PROTECT AS A RESN.T OF DRAINAGE PROJECT 19]588]0 (2T3) @ AD W SAN ANGELO OTOAVOE RELOCJVOONOFFACff- COm OCtWIFROPOSm RFLOGTE DISTR®VIOLA FACB.TIffS PROTECT Page 141 of 155 • C� J ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 142 of 155 D OFCO PROJECTS F"CRD IN GAS UTILRY PROJECT PLANT IN SERVICE OR REFIXED CUSIOAfERS NIB.iBER COST DURDTG MO BENEFITED IDCAMON PURPOSEOFPRW 19]59390 (146) REIIREfE61T ASSOCIATED WITH ALL CORSICANA REPLACE EYSTEMDdPROVEMENi3-REPLACE CUSTOMERS OPRASTRUC111RE DEFERIORATED UNDERGROUND FACRITTES 1975%2G (fig) REIIRITID4f ASSOCIATEDWITH ALL CORSICANA REPLACE SYSTPMIWROVE8ffNT5-REPLACE CUMMERS INFRASIXUCIURE 13=10RATIM MR03ERGROUND 19760470 (242) RETRET4MTASSOCIATIDWTIH ALL BURNEF RELOCATIONTOAVOW REOCAT[ONOFFACBATIFS- CUSTOMERS CONFLICT W/PROPOSED RBI.00ATEDIS UTTONFAMIMS PR03ECI ASAREULTOFSTREET RECONSTRUCTION 19761820 (108) REiNEAIDVTASSOC TIZDWITII ALL CLYDE REPLACE SYSTEMOPROVEf .REPLACE CUSTOM]M INFRASTRUCNRE 163 FEETOF 2' BARESTEEL PPE WITH 163 FEET OF 2' PLASTIC PPE 19761850 (761) REI RtEMEn IASSOCIATEDWFfII ALL ABB.ENE REPLACE SYSTII.S OVE8ffM8-REPLACE CUSTOL DPRASTRUC 347=OF V BARESTEEL PPE AND 20FEELOF2'BAREST PPEWRH 197"240 (486) REIBSEffMIASSOC TIDWITH ALL FRESCO REPLACE SY5TPMNPROVEIDTTB-REPLACE CUSTOMERS INFRASTRUCTURE W FEET OF 4' PLASTIC PDE WITH 100 19766030 (3) RETIXEffFTOFFAC6.1D65 R=E ALL DALLAS aoF PT TRUCNRE !UP OFWTIRONPPE CUSTOMERS 19266820 (LRB) REDRF2.fENTASSOC1ATm WTIN ALL DALLAS RELOCATIONTOAVOM REOCADONOFFAC]L[=- CUSTOMERS CONFLICT WI PROPOSED BEOCATEDMT]UBUTTONFACdR'OS PROJECT AS A RESULT OF CUSTOMER RE MT 1976]]90 (105) REIIREMENTASSOCTATEDWID3 ALL FABUTELD REPLACE SYSTEI ROVEB®41S-REPLACE CUSTOMERS INFRASTRUCTURE 125 FEETOF P BARE SIFM-PPE WITH 145 FEEIOF 2' PLASTICPPE 19765560 (69) RETDUa fENTASSOCIATMD R ALL WACO RBPLACE SYSTEI"ROVEM1D]!IS-REPLACE CiJSTOMERS INFRASIXU=E I00FEETOF2' WRAPPEDS=PPE WITH 100 FEET OF 2' PLARTIC PPE 19"5110 (39) RENtII.mfl'ASSOCIATED I ALL LA ASAS RIBACATIONTOAWID MOCADONOFFACB.ITIE4- CUSTOMERS CONFLiCI W/PROPOSED BELOCATEDISIR3BUTIONFACELT PROJECT ABA RESULT OF SEWERPRO IMMIG (178) RETDtE1.0dTASSO MWITH ALL CORSICANA REPLACE SYS ]MFROVEO]IIS-REPLACE CUMMEM OPMSTRUCNRE DLTFRIORATED UNDERGROUND FACR mv9 19"8180 (612) REIXtF1.te61'IASSOCIAlID WITH ALL BRYAN RELOGT[ONTOAVOID R¢OGTIONOFFACIlIT]FS- CUSTOMERS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED REOCATEDMT]UBUTTONFACB.ITUM PROJEOT AS A REBULT OF CITY PROTECT 197 G (20) REIBlFA4]2T ASSOCIATED WITH ALL RERRVD.LE BEP m SYSTEM NIPROVEFIENNB -REPLACING CUER3MER5 DPRASTRUCTURE UNDERGROUNDFACdIT]LSS 1978011G (232) RETIXE8IENT ASSOCIATED WRH ALL BECTON REPLACE 3YSTPM IMPROVEMENTS -REPLACE NSTOMERS DPRASTRUCIURE M0 FEET OF 4' BARE STEEL PPE aM[ Page 142 of 155 r -IL G r IL ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DMSION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 143 of 155 DESCFR ON OF COFIPLETED FRO2ECFS PLACED 3N GAS iFIl1.RY PROBECF PLAM IS SERVICE OR RLTPIED "STOMPS N ER COSI VU G300.3 BENEFIMD LOCATION PURPOSEOFPRO3ECT 19734450 (18) REI1RE8ffNF ASSOC MW[M ALL PLANO ME TION TO AVOID RELOCATION OF DISTRIBUTION CUSTOMERS CONFLICT WITH CITY FAMIT[ES STREPFPROJECF 1978455G (39) REMEM1IDiTASSOCIATED qLL WACO RE].00ATIONTOAVOM RELOCATION OF FACB.IIIES- CUSTOMERS COIMJ3 W/PROPOSED RELOCATE DISTRIBUTION FAMITIES Flk 3 39]36)30 (380) REMF2rffI4T ASSOCIATED WFIN ALL FRISCO BELOCATIONTOAVOID RELOCATIONOFFACdF11E5- CUSTOMERS CONFLICFWIPROPOSED BELOCATEDISTR®UTIONFACDPTIE9 PROJECT ASARESIILT UEST 1970 (10) ASSOCIATED WITN ALL KERRVELE REPLACE SYSTEM OIP2'=MEREPLACE CIISTOAffRS D9FMSTINCNRE 100EIOF' 2'STEELPIPEANO 10 FEE[OF 3' S WRB 105 FFPT 19]90110 (173) ASSOPE WFIH MAP ALL DALLAS MAPCORRECRONS CORRE=IONASSOCIATED CORRECTIONS CUSTOMERS IWW55G (99) REI'mE14NI ASSOCIATED WITH ALL CORSICANA REPLACE SYSI PPBOVEMEMS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS INPRASTRUCNRE DEFERIORAi UNDEROROUND PAM= 19390680 040) REFBBF1r@TF ASSOCIATED W[FH ALL CORSICANA REPLACE SYSITI,I PROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSttJMER3 INFRASTAUCNIRE DETERIORAMN ERORON4D FA(WI'IES 19190810 (388) REFIXEMEI4i ASSOCIATED WOH ALL MADL90N REPLACE SYSTTMD(PROVEVQ:N3S-REPLACE CUSTOMERS E INFRASTRUC 315 FEETOF2' SIF}]. PPE 19'N226G (352) 1tEFQlEM1tai ASSOCIATED WRH ALL FRISCO RELOCATIONTOAVOM RELOCATION OF FACdRIFS- CUSTOMERS CONPL WIPROPOSED REIACATEDLSIR®UTIONFAW.F PROJECT ASA RESULTOF STT=mOJECF 1939492(1 (315) RE11RE6PNFASSOCTATEDWRN ALL WI RDSON RELOCATIONTOAVOM RELOCATIONOFFACIL=- NSTOMERS CONFLICTWIMOPOSED BELOCA3EDISIR "ONFACa1 PROTECT ASARESMTOFALLEY V PROVEhtENF3 19396580 (413) RLTIXEIPI4TASSOCTATEDWFTH ALL ARCHES= REPLACE SYShTIB.PROVBMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS pPRA$H[UCNRE 393FEEFOF2-BARESTP➢.PPE W Oi 393 PREF OF 2-PLAS=ME 1979659G (27) REMEM1IDVT ASSOCIATED WFTii ALL FORTWORM RELOCATIONTOAVOID RELOCATION OF FACO.ITIFS- CUSTOMERS CONFLTCTW/PROPOSED RETDCATEDISTR®U31ONFACLLTIPS PROTECT ASARFSULTOFSTREETPROIECF 19T9661G (2N) RETIXET@4F ASSOCIATED WIFI4 ALL WICIDTA REPLACE SYST MROVFMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS FALLS PIFMSTRUCNRE 210 FETTOF 4 -BARE STEEL PPR WEIR 210FEETOF4'PLASTICME 19796620 (216) RCINF1,iQ.T ASSOCIATED W3IH ALL WICMFA REPLACE SYSI IWROVEMEMS-REPLACE CUSTONffRS FALLS TNFRASTRUCNRE 100 FELTOF 6 -BARE STEEL PPE WTTH 100 FEET OP 6' PLASHC PPE 19]93466 (153) REFI4EmEFtT ASSOCIATED WITH ALL TFAPLE REPLACE REPLACE CUSTOEffRS I4FRASTRUCNRE DEIMI RATED N)EFLO DETERIORATED UNOfl4GRgIND FACRITPS 19799990 (20) REIB4E8POTTASSOCIATEDWRN ALL BRYAN Md TIONTOAVOM RELOCATION OF FAMI11ES- CUSTOMERS CONFLICFW/PROpm— RELOCATEDISIR®UIIONFACO.NIES PROJECT AS A RESULT OF GO VERNAff N'FAL Page 143 of 155 f r�L CJ ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MIO-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Pape 144 0( 155 D N FCOAIPLeTHD PROJECTS PLACED IN GAS DTH.JTY PROJECT PI.M=INSERNC ORRETDIED "STONERS ND m COST DUING2003 BENEFITED LOCATION PURP0 OFPR02RCT 198DMG (49) REITRE84N1'ASSOCLiTID WTIH ALL SOUTMARE Rt]D TIONTOAVOID RELOCATIONOFFAM=- NSTOMERS CONFLICTW/PROPOMD RFIOCATEDISTRBUD0N FACB.[IPS PROSECT AS A RESULT OF CITY PROTECT 1980596G (113) REHRB603tTASSOCNTBDWTTH ALL ENVIRONS RELOCATION TO AVOID RElO MONOFFACD.TTPS- NSTOMERS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDLSTR®UTIONFACB.RIES PROJECT 19MSG Q31) RETIXFAPN(ASSOCIAmID ALL A JNGTON RELOCATION TO AVOID RELOCATIONOFFACB.ITIES- NSTOM1PPS CONFLICFW/PROPOSED RELOCAMDMTRIDUTTONFACIL= PROSECT ASARESULTOFGO�AL 19810550 (39) RETBt4. NTASSOCIATEDWRN ALL ROUND ROCK RF3.O TIONTOAVOID RELOCATIONOFFACNTffS- CUSTOMERS CONFLICFW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDIS UH0NFACM= PROJECT 19810860 (159) AEITRII.ATTf ASSOCIATED W[IH ALL WICMTA REPLACE SYS HPROVEMElHS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS FALLS DJERASTRUCTURE IWFEETOFIBARES PPEWHX 100 FEST OF P PLASTIC PPE 1981MIG (113) RE1ffiEBIDJTASSOCIATID WTIH ALL PALMER RFJDCAHONTOAVOM RFJACATI0N0FFACR3TB4- CUSTOMERS CONFLICT W/PROPoSED RELOCATEDISUUBUHONFACB,H@S PROJECT AS A RFRULTOF EXFANSIONOF HIGH 19813390 (18) WIC A RELOCATKWTOAVOW RELOCATIONOFFAM=- CUSTOMERS FALLS CONFLICT W/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISTRBUDONFACO,RPS PROJECT ASA RESULT OF GOVERM.4NTAL REQUEST 19814330 (121) AETIREM142VTASSOCIAitD WGH ALL GEORGETOWN REG TIONTOAVOM RELOCATION OF FACB.IT@S- CUSTOMERS CONFl.ICTW/PROPoSED RELOCATEDISINBUTIONFACB.HTE4 PROJECT ASARESULTOFGOVPRMAfi TAL REQ= 198150)0 (1,085) REIIXESIDO'ASSOCIATID WITH ALL A JNGTDN RII.00ATSONTOAVOID RFlOCAT10N OF FACB.R@S- CUSTOMERS CONH.ICTW/PROPOSED RFJDCATEDISIR®UTIONFACIL I PROJECT AS A RESULT OF GOVERNAffiTTAL 19F1113G (403) REIREt+PNTAS30CfATED WJTH ALL BRYAN REPLACE SYSTEM 0.PR0VEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS OPRASTIEUCNItE 280 FEET OF 3- S= PM WRH 280 =OF3'PLASHCPPR 198D61G (1,161) AEIIREM1OiT ASSOCIATID WITH ALL ABB.ENE R OCAT10NT0AVOM RELOCTIONOFFAW.TIIES- NSTOMERS CONFLICTWJPROPOSED Md TRDIS UTIONFACBJHFS PROJECT 19824080 (321) REI@FA4NT ASSOC1AT[M WITH ALL BRYAN REPLACE SYSTEMUPROVEAffME-REPLACE CUSTOMFILS BJFRASTRUCTURE DTFBPT OF4' STFII. PPE 19824566 (141) RETDIEI.PN'f ASSOCIATED WITH ALL SAN ANGFIO REPLACE SYS INIFR0VEMEMS-]WLACE CUSTOMERS INFRASIRUCRIHE 350 FEET OF 2' BARE STEEL PPE WITH 350 FEET OF 2' PLASTIC PPE 19824XG (89) REfIXEhffNTASSOCIATEOWITH ALL SOUIM.N(E RECO MFAM=DM RFIOCATTON OF DIS UHON CUSTOMERS TO GOVERNMENTAL FACHIHFS REQUEST 19824]50 (293) REIIREMEMASSOCIATED WfIH COMAPR MARBLE RELOCATIONTDAVOM RELOCATION OF FACd1TlES- FALLS CONHJCTW/PROPOSED RFLOCATEDISTR®UTI0N FACB.IIIE4 PROTECT ASARESULTOFC0FAIER 19824750 (0) REDRFb1ENNTASSOC =WITH ALL BECTON REPLACE SYSTEMB.PR0VFAffNTS-REPLACE CUSTOF OPRASTRUCIHRE 37FF£T0F3'13 R STEIIPPEAND 28FEETOF4-P T[CPPEWITHW Pape 144 0( 155 Cl • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 145 of 155 DES�ON OF COBRLETED PROBECCS PLACED D2 GAS U8PlTe PRO.IECf PLM MSERWCEORRETBIED NSIOME115 NOMBER COSC DU G2003 BENEF8FR0 IACAT30N PURPOSEOFPROOECC 19826260 (1,102) REIIXEt.D:NTASSOCIAFBDWRB ALL SAN ANGFLO REPLACE SYSTEM DWROVEEPNIS-REPLACE CUSTObfERS BJPRASTRUCIURE 310FEECOFVBARESCF MEAND 49FEET0F6'WR MSTEELPPE 1982700 (254) � ASSOC3AIEDWRN ALL SAN ANGELO REPLACE SYS7 A@ROVEAffMS-REPLACE CUBTOF@RS DARASTRUCIURE 369FEECOF2-BARESCLT4.PPE WRB 19837250 (6) REFIRETIDlFASSOCfATEDWRN ALL LAMPASAS REPLACB SYSTAf pPROVEMEMS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS BVFRASTRUCRR2E 11UFEETOF 4' BARESTEEL PPE WITH 113 FEEFOF 4' PLASMC PPE 1983825G (460) REIIRENIENI'ASSOCIATID WRH ALL DALLAS REPLACE SYSTEl4 APROVEMEM$-REPLACE CUSID1dFJtS D]FRASR03CIURE 2'DISTRILTREGULATORSTARON 19841520 (129) RERRE60]lIASSOCIAIED WITR ALL STANFORD REPLACE SYSTPM36PROVE65ENC5-REPLACE CUSTOMERS DPRASMUC 57FEEFOFWBARESTFE1.PPEWFFE 55 FFEF OF W PLASRCFPE 1984]660 (146) RERREMENCASSOCIA]IDW7CH ALL NA L REPLACE SYSTFMDPROVEEfE6IlH-REPLACE CUSTOMERS WFRA5IRUC[URE 220FEETOF P BARE SCFPPE WITH YLO FEEL OF 2' PLASTIC PM PPE 198/4140 (131)RERREnONOFASSOCIATED WRH ALL COPPERAS RELOCAHONTOA RFlOCACB.RIES- CUSTOLOiRS CAVE CONFIICCW/PROPOSED RELOCATEM DIS PAOIECC TOFRIBllRONFACB.RPB AS A RESULT OF DRAINAGE PROPLT 198"930 (P,891) RERREhPN'CASSOCIATED WIT" ALL mm RFlO =NTOAVOM RELOCATIONOFFACB.ITIES- NSTOAfERS CONFLICC W/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISTRSBUIIONFA=ES PROIECC ASAFXSUT0FPAV D!G FROIECC 19"5070 (4,335) REftREMEN'1'ASSOCIATED WCIH ALL FORESTML REPLACE SYSTEM DPROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS E STRUCRBtE PLASRC PPE 198005G (30.'04) RERRE64NIASSOCIATEDWRH ALL SAN ANGELO RELOCAMONTOAVOM RELOCATIONOFFACB.RIES- CUST06fER5 CONFLICIWIPROPOSEO RELOCATEDISIRIBURONFACB.RIE9 PRORCT 19853126 (603) RECMEI.DBiTASSOCIAIIID ALL TAYLOR RELOCATION TO AVOM RELOCATIONOFFACB.FRFS- CUSTOMERS CONFLICCW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDL9TR BI ONFACH3TP8 PROIECI ASA RESULT OF BRG)CiE 1985375G (3) REI3REMENIASSOCIATEDWRR ALL DESOTO RELOCARONTOAVOM RELO noNOFFA=ES- CUSIOAfER3 CONE =W/PROPOSED RELOCATEDLSYRB3 ONFACB.RIE4 PROSECT ASARFSULTOFALLEY 19856616 (119) REIREI.R2TTTASSOCIATED WTCH ALL CAOWWLLS RELO MONTOAVOM RELOCATIONOFFACB.RPS- CUSTOMERS CONFWCIW/PROPOSED RFIOCATEDISTR B=NFA=ES PROTECT ASARESULTOFBR E RECONSTRUCTION 19858780 (298) RECREI.D2+TASSOCIATEDW ALL ABB.ENE REPLACE SYSTFTCAPROVEMEMS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS DVFRASTRUCNRE 300� oF3-BARESCBEa,PPEWRN 200FEEIOF3'PLASRCPPE 19860596 (150) RECIXENL]4T ASSOCL= WRN ALL WACO RERRE WFASTRUCIURE REMOVALOFFACEITffiS-R=IB NSNMERS FEET0F4-CASTM0NPPE 19861836 (4,357) RERREMENI ASSOCIAFFD MM ALL ABB REPLACE SYS7EN5 O�S-REPLACE CUSTOARRS DPRASTRUCIURE 477 FEHCOF 4' BARE SiE£[. PPE WRH 421 FEELOF 4' PLASTC PPE Page 145 of 155 • 0 • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Pop 146 of 155 DES ONOFCOAR'I.ETED PROJECTS PLACED W GAS UTRAiY PROJECT PLANT M SERVICE OR RETRIED CDSJOMERB NUABER COSF DSBOSG 100 BENEFITED LOCATION PURPOSEOFPROMB 19863106 (501) RETOUMENTASSOCIATIDWTDJ ALL ABRENE REDREB RASTRUCNRE REMOVALOFFACRT -REID le CUSTOMER4 =OFV WRAPPED SLID. PPE AND 19865950 (9) ASSOCIATED WTIH AU LITTLERIVFIt REPLACE SYSTFMD4PROVEMFNTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS ACADEMY OORASTRUC 14 FEEFOF T BARE STEEL PIPE AM 14EEETOFYPLASIICFPE 19569340 (116) RIfDRABMASS AMDWUR ALL SEAGOVBLE REPIACE RELOC UONOFDMTRB3UMON CUSIOFBRS INFPASTRUCIURE 19815316 (623) RETBESIDJTASSOCIAMID ALL SANANGELO REPLACE SYSTFMBPROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOLSERS OPMSTRUCHBE 411 FEET OF Y BARE STEEL PPE WTIH 411 FEEF OF Y KASTICPPE 19514366 (1,528) RETIRFMFMASSOCIAIEDW ALL BALCH REPLACE SYSTEM DPROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS SPRII4CS O4FRASTRUCHJRE 160 F EEF OF T PLASTIC PPE 1997458G (136) RETBF3.D]ITASSOCIATEDWfTH ALL WACO RELOCATION TO AVOID RFJ.00AHONOFFACRTDFR- CHSIOMFRS CONFMGTW/PROPOSED RI ATEDMTRMUTIONFACDL PROJECT ASA RESULT OF RELOCAHON TO 198]4816 (66) RLITREMEIITASSOCIAIIDWITR ALL ROCRDALE REDRE INFRASFRLCTURE RFMOVALOFFACM. -REMOVE CUSTOMBRS DBIRBUIIONFAM= 198]5460 (331) REDR@.ffNPA$5 AI1DW ALL BUFFALO REI TIONTOAVOD REIACATIONOFFACR.I - CUSTOMERS CONFLICTWIPROPOSED RELOCATEDBTRBUTIONFACD.IIBS PROTECT AS A REBULTOF HIGHWAY 19885806 (m) IIETIREhB]VTASSOCIATED 3VT[FI ALL BRYAN RFL.00ATIONTOAVOID RELOCAUONOFFACD.ITIBS- CUSTOMERS CONFLICIW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDLSTRBUIIONFACBJTIES PROJECT 19888M0 (66) RE[DJEBBNTASSOCN'IIDWfIH ALL IB.LSBORO REPLACE SYShMI OVE8BM5S-REPLACE CUSTON1E183 O4 FM8TRUCIIIRE IOOFEETOF T BARE STEEL Pn WITH 106 FEETOF 2' PLASTIC PPE 19888606 On) REIBEBBNTASSOCL1TEp WITH ALL COLLEGE RELOCAHONTOAVOID RELOCAUONOFFACRITPS- CIIS omN STATION CONFL/awl PROPOSED RELOCATEDISTRBUOONFACdT11ES PROJECT 1988871G (50) RCTBEFPNTASSOCIATFDWUN ALL CALDWELL RELOCAHONTOAVOID RELOCATIONOFFACD.RPB- CUSFOMER3 CONFLICTWIPROPOMD RELOCATEDISTRBUIIONFACRITIE3 PROTECT ASA RESULT OF STORM SE W ER CONSTRUCTION 19886156 (159) REOREMENTASSOCIAMDUH ALL PALESTD4E REPLACE SYSTFMNPROVEM1ffiNSS-R-REPLACE CUSTOMERS PIFRASTRUCNRE 4•CASTBONMAPIS WlTF1218FEEf OFTPLAST[CPPE 19893996 (T85) RETBE6ID4TASSOCIATEDWTTH ALL PLANO RELOCATION TO AVOID RELOCATION OF FACBJTBS- CU519hBR9 CONELICTWJPROPOSEO Rd TEDISTRBUOONFACRITPB PROJECT AS A RERULT OF CUSTOW R REQUEST 19894686 (30) RETBF].IDfl'ASSOCIATED WITH ALL LOTLERIVER REPLACE SYSTEMO OVE8BNT5-REPLACE CIJSICIMER3 ACADEMY WFRASTRUCHBE 13 FEETOF 2' BARE S'hh>7.. PPE WI[fi 19899866 (13) REI'BFl.BE'I ASSOCIATED WITH ALL KFRRVDLE REPLACE SYSTEMP ROVFABNTS-REPLACE CUSTOh MFRASIRUCNPE 10FEETOFV WRAPPEDSTEEI.PPE WITH 25 FEETOF V PLASTIC PPE Pop 146 of 155 Ll • 11 ATMOS ENERGY CORP.. MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 147 of 155 ..ION OF 008RLETED PROJECIRPLACEDINGASOTILRY PROJECT PLA WSERVICEORIIE=D CESTO111eR9 NfI6DBe CORP DURDIGM BENEPLPED LOCATION PURPOSEOFPROJECT 1990100G (569) 1(ETIXEAIDTTASSOCIATEDWTTH ALL ABILEED3 REPLACE SYSTEMdPROVESP.N38-REPLACE CUS7DMER5 E9FRASTRUCNRE 335 FEEF OF P BARE STEELPDE WDN 335 FEET OFP PLASTIC PPE 19901016 (177) REIIRETOG'AS90CIATED WRH ALL ABB.E603 REPLACE SYSTEMB.PROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTO2AER5 APRAS'fINCNRE 153FEETOFPBARESIFJR.PPE WTIH 153 FEET OP P PLASTIC PPE 19501580 (195) RETNE6IDJTASS ATEDWTIH ALL COLLEAE REPLACE SVSTFJH 0.PR0VEMENTS-REPLACE COST]FffR.9 STATION WFMSTRUC 200FEETOF4•STF FMWTIN2W EEETOF 4' PLASTIC PPE 19%3980 (206) RF.TIREA4NTASSOCI MMM ALL COLUGE RFI TION TO AVOm RELOCATION OF FAM - CUSTOMERS STATION CO TCTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISIRBIUIIONFAC]1,= mo=T IMM30 (189) REYBIE ITASSOCIA3EDW1131 AL1 ROGPJ23 REPLACE SYSIEMDIPROVEMENI$-REPLACE CUSTOMERS WFRA.SIRUCTURE 103 FEET OF P BARE STEE1. PPEAND 47 FEETOFV CAST @ON PIPE W 19907486 (6P!) REmtE86ENTASSOCIATEDWTIE ALL DALLAS REPLACE SYSTEM EBIliNTS-REPLACE CUSTOAffRS A'FRASIRUCIVRE OF3- 388 FEETOF3'WRAPPEAn[CF PE W RH 3%FEET OF 2• PLASTIC PIPE 199N2JG (619) IU?TIRE6ft1.TASSOCII'JFD W ALL STEPFd+NVD.I. REPLACE SVSTETDEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS E B4FMSIRUCNRE DEIERIOMORATIE TED UNDER6AOUND 19913550 (62) ALL SANANGELO REPLACE SYSTEMENSaSSOC1ATIDWITH SYSTEM -REPLACE CUSTONffRS INFRASTIIUCNRC SMS 90 FEETOF 2'BARE STEEL PPE WISH 19914630 (5) RE17R WRH OF ALL ROBINSON RELOCATwlmo VOm FC1ATID RELOCAMDISTFACUJTIER- TION CUSTOR4R.T CONFLImom7 OPoSID RELOCATE DISTR®UA FACdTTPS PROJECT 19915796 (314) REmU1d WITH ALL CAMERON R IONOFOCIATED R AM CUSTONIDL9 IcTIONTomV CONFl.ICIW7PROPoSID WAM DISTIFBUTIONES- RPIOCATEDISIRIBUTION PACdIIPS PROJECT 19916186 (303) REUREMIONOFOCIaTED WITH ALL PARIS R RELOC CUSTOMERS IcT10NT0AVOm CONELICTW/PROPOSED MDISFFACBJNFA RELOCATED[STRB3UTON FACdIIIFS PROTECT 1%16596 (13) RETBUR.ffhTASSOC1aTE-WDN ALL WICHITA REPLACB CUSTOMERS EALLB INFRASTRUCNRE 34S TB.PROVEh TBMREPLACE 34FRETOF2•BARESTEPE WITH 34 FF£T OF Y PLASTIC PPE 19917486 (fig) RBTB(F]IEt'r62TASSOCiatF-W ALL GATESVBIE REPLACE SYSMTOF3'BAMMS-REPLACE CUSTOhPA3 IMEASTRUCNRE 100FEE-TOF3'BARE STEEI.PPE WTIH 125F EET OF 3• PLASTIC PPE 19928430 (fl3) I(EnEWW ASSOCIATE ALL GRFLIiVB.LE REPLACE -W IMPROVE6�NT5-RFPLACE CIISTOMER9 MFRAS-RNCNRE 121M 121 FEET OF 2' BARE STFF]R.. PPE 1%32346 (168) REMO.IDiT ASSOCIATED WTIN ALL 14CGREGOR REPLACE SYSTEMTMPROVEMENTS-REPLACE mSTOMERS B9FRASTRUCToltE 156FEET0F2•BARESIEELPPE WHH 156FEET0E2•PLAST[CPPE 19936186 (74) RETIXEM1E.ffh SOC UDW ALL ABdENE REPLACE SYSTFMdPROVF].mT1H-REPLACE CUSTOS BffRASTRUClURE 19 FEET OF 2' BARE STEEL PPE AND 35 FEET OF 4• BARESTPPL PPE WITH 19939050 (26,240) REMFAff TmswIATFDW ALL IFbflLE RELOCATION TO AVOm RFLOCATIONOFFACB.RPS- CUST081EE5 CONFLICTW/PROPOSED R WATEDISTRB3UTIONFACd1TIE9 PROJECT ASA RESULT OF STR 19960826 (47) REmtQ.PNTASSOC1a1EDWHH ALL ABdENE REPLACE SYS'[EM 0.PROVE6fENTS-RPPLACE CUSTOMERS WFRASTRUCNRE 66 mnoF P CAnmoNPPE WITH 66 Page 147 of 155 U • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIASIUTY PROGRAM TARIFF HUNG PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 148 of 155 D M0FMWUTKD PRO2P.Ll5 PLACED DJ GAS UTILITY P80FECF PLA WSERVICEORREFRIED "SF mmm N1119®ER COSF DU G2003 BENEFTTTD LOCATION PURPOSE OF PROKCF 19942030 (19) RETWE84WTASSOCIATIIDWRN ALL LLANO REPLACE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENFS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS DPRASTRUCTURE 10FEETOF2'ST PPEAND3FEEF OF 2'STEEL. PM 14 FEEF OF 3' 19942206 (66) RETIRED4NF ASSOCIATED W ALL PALESTINE REPLACE SYSTAJB OVEMENIS-REPLACE CIJSF0L BiFMS1'RUCIVRE 100 FEEF OF 2' STER. PPE WRN 100 = OF 2' PLASTIC PPE IM24M (3W) RENIET4WTASSOCIATEDWFFN ALL EASILAND REPLACE SYSTIWP 0VEMENT3-ABANDON CUSTOMERS B4FMSTRUCTIIRE 190FEEFOFSBAREE PPEAND 2WFEEF0F2'FL UCPPE 19945746 (139) REEIREEffiFFASSOCIAFFDWRH ALL A MGTON RELOCATEWMAV RELOCATIONOFFACB.ERRS- CUSTOMERS CONFLICFWIPROPOSED RIRACATEDL9IRIBUTIONFACB. PROTEGE ASA RESULT OF EXPANSION OF UNIVERSITY FA� 199485/6 (31) REIBiEBfENFAS50CIATED WITH ALL FORT WORTN REPLACE SYSTEM0.PR0VFMENF3-REPLACE NSTOMFRS INFRASTRUCF(JRE DETERIORATEDUfID ROIM FAMITI5 1995W60 (0) RERREAPNTASSOCLTTEDWITH ALL ENV m REPLACE SYSTEM D.@ ROVE61ENT5-REPLACE NSTOMERS OPRAS'IRUCCURE 260FEEF01`2'BAREST PIPEWITH 260 FEEF OF 2- PLASTIC PPE 19950346 (242) RETRREMENTASSOCI MD ALL ROWENA REPLACE SYSTEM UPROVEMENIS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS DPRASTRUCFIIRE 324FEEf OF4'BARE$hIlPPE WFFR 324 FEETOF4' PLASTIC PPE 19950760 0%) RETBlII.ID9TASSOCIATED WITH ALL OLNEY REPLACE SYSM[M ROVERIENIS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS JNFRASTRIICIURE v FP81'OF 2' RARE STEEL. PPE AND 19950780 008) RETIXEODNFASSOCIATEOWIIH ALL ARCHER CFFY REPLACE SYST WROVEMENIS-REPLACE CUSNMERS INERASTRUCNRE DETMIORATFD UNDERGROUND FAMITE S IW51920 (13) AE-1'IXFAffN1'ASSOCIA'IID WITH ALL FORTWORTH REPLACE SYSTWM 110VEA4NF5-REPLACE CUSSOMERS WFRASTRUCNRE 19957520 (23) RE-IRFAPNI ASSOCIATED WFIH ALL BRYAN REIACATIONTOAVOM RELOCARON OF FACMRPS- CUSTOMERS CONFLICFW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISTRIBUDONFAMR PROJECT 19959390 (648) RETBIE6PNTASSOCMTEDWRH ALL COLLEGE REPLACE SYSIEMUPROVENBiMS-REI9 m CUSTOMERS STATION DIPRASTRUCfURE 19960100 (4I) REI➢IEI.rtINFAS50CIAIiB1 WITH ALL ABREWE REPLACE SYSR ROVEMENB-REPLACE CUStt1N DJFRASTRUCNRE 35 FEETOF4' BARES=PPE WRH 1996W70 (38) RE2IXELID-RAS90CIATID WRH ALL SAN ANGE REPLACE SYSTEM ROVEMETOB-REPLACE CUSFOM1 BhRASTRUCNRE 26 FEEF OF P BARE SRFL PPE AND 13 FEEFOF 3' BARE STEEI. PPEWRH 1996UIG (25) REINAIFNIASSOCIATED WRH ALL JOSHUA R MATTONTOAVOID REIACATIONOFFAMT[ES- CUSTOMERS mlN lCFW/PROPOSED RELOCATE DISTRBJURON FACD.ITRS PROJECT ASA RESULT OF DAA W AGEPROJECF IW65550 (48) REIIREE¢N'1'ASSOCIA'IID WRH ALL TEMPLE REP a SYSTF WROVEhP1TFS-REPLACE CEISTOMERS WFRAS7INCNRE 3' BARE SIFJ3 PPE W 132=0 32FEETOF2'PLASEICPDT 199'1W10 (236) REMQ.ffFRASSOCLITEDWRH ALL TERPLE REPLACE SYSIEAIB OVIO`BBRS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS O4YMSTRUCNRE DEIERIORAT UNDERGROUND FACB.RP,S Page 148 of 155 • C, J • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 149 of 155 ..'loNoFWWmm PRO2ECIBPLACED W GAS UTdQY PBO3ECF PLANTIWSERWCEORRRTIRED "STONERS NDS®ER COSP DO NG20R1 BENEFRFD LOCATION FDRPOBEOFPROJECF IW74296 (229) RETIREMETASSOLMTEDWIIH ALL BRYAN RELOCATIONTOAVOM RELOCATION OF FACB.TFPS- CUSTOMERS CONFLICT W/PROPOSED RELOCATEDIST TIONFAW.I PROJECF ASARES(RTOFSTItEEF RECONSMW ION 199 m (1,019) RETOff2.R3dFASSOCIATtDWFOI ALL ALLEN REPLACE SYSTEM 0.PROVESffNF3-REPLACE CUSTOA4ERR3 WFRASIRIICRJRE 480 FEETOF 4' BARE STEEL. PPE WRN 480 FEET OF 4" PLASTIC PPE AND 30 19980900 (105) REfRESffNTASSOCIATED ALL EARLY RELOCATIONTOAVOM RELOCAMONOFFACD.NIES- CUSTOS CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDIS INIONFAM= PROJECT 199W130 (92) RETBtESB]iTASSOCIATEDWDH ALL COLLEGE RELOCATION TO AVOW RELOCATION OF FAC61TIE5- CUSTOMERS SFATON CONFLICF W/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISTRIBV MFACLLITIFS PROJECL 19990636 (374) RETRQ.ffNTASSOCTATEOWDT ALL DENTON FORTPICATONORSYSTEM SYST0.8 R.bROVEf.B:NIS-REPLACE CIJSTOMER.S D-PROVEM1S�NNI MADi ON AUDRA LANE M DEMON 199926)6 (]97 REI3RESIDTFASSOCIATED ALL ALLEN ROACAMNMAV0m RFLOCAMONOFFACdIT@R- CUSTOSfl:RB CONFLICFW/PROPOSED RELOCATEDISDB ONFAM= PROFRCF ASARESULTOFSBEE3 RECONSTRUCTION 20009250 (156) RETIRFbff11TASSOCIATED ALL STEPIPIIVLLL REPLACE SYSTEM RIPR0VFMF3TF3-RIPCACE CUSTOAQ!RS E BIFRASTRUCNRE 165FEETOF2'BARESTF MEWOR 165 FEET OF 2' PLASTIC PIPE 2000 x (I87) REFIXEBffNTASSOCIATEDWITI3 ALL TEMPLE RELOCATIGNTOAVM RELOCATION OF FACd11m5- QISTOMERS CONNCTW/PROPOSED RELOCAMDISDl =NFAW.TIFFS PROTECT ASA RESULT OF S'IREEF 20011190 (333) RET N WDH ALL PLANO R CA WFCIATED RELOCATIONOFF CUSTOMERS ICTONTOAVOm CONFLICIW/PROPOSED MONFS- RELOCATE DISCRIBIRIONFACRRPS PROJECT 20014486 (34) REIIREMENTASSOCIATFDWFTR ALL ABaENE REPLACE 5YSTPOF2-OVEMEM3-REPLACE CUSTOSIl2L4 1NFRASTRUCIVRE 501=OF 2' B PPE WITII T[CEEL SO FEEL OF 3•PLASTCPPE 2003)526 (M) REFQIAnONOFFC1ATED WFFH All KERRVdLE RELOCATIONTOAVOm R ATDMMBCR.ONFA NSTOSffR3 CONFWCTW/PROPOSED REWCATE PROIECF AS A RESULT OF DRAINAGE PROIECC TOFDRAINAGE PRd 30032126 (62) REIWEhPNI ASSOQ =WON ALL SAN ANGFLO REPLACE SYSIFAI B.PROVES�NiS-RF19,ACE "STONERS DJFMSTRUCNRE W FEET OF 2- BARE STEEL. PPE WRIT W FEET OF 2- PLASTIC PPE M3M3G (439) REFRtEMENTASSO(AATEDWRR ALL ABM. RETIRE DiFRASIRUCIURE REMOVALOFFACLLITOS-ABANDON CUSTOSPRS 378 FEEF OF 4' CAST BmN PPE 2003T30G (13) RETIXFdffSM ASSOCJA= WRR ALL CALDWFLL RELOCATIONTOAVOW RELOCATION OF FACR.NPS- CUSTOMERS CONFli wl PROPOSFm RFLOCAMDISTR =U FACLLTM_S PROJECF 20062436 (27) RETOtERffidFASSOCIATFD ALL SANANGELO REPLACE SYSTEMDPROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS MFRASTRUCNRE 32FEETOF4• BARE STEEI. PPE W 32FEETOF4'PL MCPPE ZOM390G (133) REF@Q.IDTFASSOCIAT WITS ALL WICHITA REPLACE SYST]ADAPROVEMEMS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS FALLS DIFRASIRUCIURE 200 FEET OF P SAKE STEEL. PPE 20043926 (109) RETOtt•;NF TASSOCIAT WILT ALL ARCHERCNY REPLACE SYSTFMB.IPROVENIENIS-REPLACE LTIS� WFRASTRUCNRE 100 FEEF OF 2' BARE STEEL PPE Page 149 of 155 IIL c • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID -TE% DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 150 of 155 DESCRTTION OF COMPLETED PROS FSPLACED2NGASPTR2TY PROJECT PLANTN'SERVICEORRETB CUSTOMERS NUTTER COST OURMG 2003 BENEFTFED TACATTON PURPOSE OF PROJECT ID04616G (49) REIBtEM1IDTTASSOCIATEDWITR ALL BROWNWOOD REPLACE SYSTEMRPROVELPNTS-REPLACE NSTOMERS WRASTRUCTURE 40FEEIOF4-BARBSTFELPWE W[IH 40EFSI OF 4"PLASTIC PTE 20051050 (47) RETIREt mV'[ASSOCWTm WITH ALL WICWTA RELOCATION TO AVOM R OCATIONOFFA=ES- CUSTOMERS FALLS CONFLICT W/PROPOSED R OCATEDLSTRBIUTIONFAMMS PROJECT ASARESULTOFOOV ERNMENTAL 20053456 (66) IIEIIREA4NTASSOCIATEDWTTH ALL WICTBTA REPLACE SYSTE WFROVEFffNTS-REPLACE CUSTOhffILS FALLS WFRASTRUCTURE 100FEETOF 2' BARE STEFT. PTE 20058126 (242) REFB(ESti1DVV'TASSOCNTFD WITH ALL ABR.ENE REPLACE SYSTEM AIPROVQ.@JTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS DTRASTRUCNRE 395 FEEFOF T BARE STFEL PTE WITH 395FEETOF2'PLASTICPTE W1153X3 (277) RETTREMENTASSOCIATEDWHH ALL CLEBURNE REPLACE SYSIEMIATROVE84NT5-REPLACE CUFTOA iNFRASTRUCNRE DETERIORATED UNDERGROUND FACILMES 20136916 (3) AEID1E5ffNTASSOC1ATEp WITH ALL BRYAN FORTPICATIONORSYSTEM WSTALLATIONOFPTEAND CUSTOAffRS PIPROVEFOST APPURTENANCES 201514IG (195) RETB2ET.IDJTASSOCIATEDWRH ALL ARDPNE REPLACE SYSTFMATROVE38ENT3-REPLACE CUSNMERS OJFRASIRUCfURE N4FEEFOF4"BARESIEEI.PPE WUH N8 FEET OF 4" PLASTIC PPE 20151M (53) RETIRENffNTASSOCIAtEDWHH ALL CLERURNE REPLACEERFOSED SYSTEMB.TROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS FACR.ITIFS E SEDPTE 2017641G (2) RETBtEN4NTASSOCIATEDWfTH ALL MY" REPLACE SYSTEM0. OVE6ffMTS-REPLACE NSTOMERS INFRASTRUCTORE 359FEETOFY STEELPTE 2018337G (91) REfBiFAffNTASSOCIATEDW ALL WICIRTA REPLACE SYSTFd1 OVEMEM3-REPLACE CUSTOMERS FALLS JNFRASTRUCTURE 30 FEET OF 6- STPPL. PPE WTIH 30 20192050 (15) RETGtE2r1FNTASSOCIATEDWTTN ALL COLLEGE REPLACE SYSTEMR"PROVEF6Nf5-REPLACE CUSTOMERS STATION INFMSTRUCIURE 335FEET0F2-SIEEEI.PPEWT M5 M193MG (21Q REIIXELffNTAS50CiATID W[IH COMD®( DALLAS SYBT IWANSIONDUE DISTALLATIONOFPPEAND TOCUSTOMFRGROWIH AFPURTENANCE3-BISTALL359FEET OF Y PLASTIC PT$ 9 FEET OF 2' PLASTICP AND6FEISTOPB" 20195320 (3) REI3RQ.ffNT ASSOCIATID WITH ALL COPPERAS RFIOCATIONTOAVOW RELOCATIONOFFAMMES- CTI3TOMER3 COVE CONFLICTW/PROPOSED RELOGTE DISTR®NOON FACB.RPS PROJECF AS A REROLT OF STORM ORAB3 N198T30 (24) RRT6t12.P3.T ASSOCIATED WTDI ALL DALLAS REPLACE SYSTFMPPROVEE4M3-REPLACE CUSTOMERS MFRASTRUCTURE DEIEIUORATEDUNDERGROUND FAMMS 20R1255G (39)REPLACE SOTTASSOCIAT(-WITH ALL DALLAS SYSTEM YBTEM D.PROVE6fENT3REPLACE CUSTOMER$ MFRASTRUCTIIRE mss7710 (16) ALL DALLAS REPLACE SYSTEM DdPROSSOCIATE-WITH SYSTEM D.PROVEMENIS-REPLACE NSTOEffR4 WFRASTRUCHDtE 16FMOF2-DSTPIPZ T 16£OF2-FLASHCFP 30369850 (1,525) RETIXENIDTTASSOCNTED WITH ALL MORAN REPLACE SYSI8M OVEMENTS-REPLACE CIIST088fERR.4 OPRASTRUCMt£ DEIFR[ORAT®UtIDFAGftOVND FACLLTHES Page 150 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 151 of 155 DESC F WWMTED PROJECTS PLACED TN GAS IITdYI V PROJECT PSd WSERVICEORREITRF,D CUSTOMERS NUMBER COST DU G2003 BENEFITED LOCATION PURPOSEOFPRO3ECT 30280IIG (1) RETDUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH ALL COPPERAS RETME OJEMSTRUCNRE REMOVALOFFACdRMS-RETME145 CUSTONB3R5 COVE FFET0F2-BARES=PIPE 20299920 (1) �ASSOC2ATED ALL am REPLACE SYSTFMDMROVEMENTS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS DIFMSTRUCNRE 61 FEET OF 3• BARE STEEI. PTE 20326136 (33) RE[MFMEMASSOCIATED WDH MAP ALL FORTWORTN MAP CORRECTIONS CORRECDONS CUSTOMERS 3ABLRUTG (mi) RETMFI.D29TOFSMWMLD ncemEN'ML& ABILENE RETME WFRASTRUCTURE COEAffRCUU. DISTIUCT 3ABLRPLG (1.]46) RETMFAMNTASSOCIATED RESmENTLll. ABRENE REPLACE SYSOMU.O'ROVEBffMS-REPLACE DISTRICT MERASTRUCNRE SERVICELBMS 3ARLRETG (2]9) REIIXFAffNTOFSPRVICELINES RESDENTTAL& ARLMWN RETME WFRASTRUC COMET ML DISTDCT 3ARLRPLG (7,104) RETMFASENTASSOC1ATfDW RFSmBNTW. ARLINGTON REPLACE SYSTEMRrMROVESMMS-REPLACE DIEDUCT D4FRASTRUCTURE SERVICE LBVES 3ATNRETO (753) RETMFl.MITI OF SERVICELWFS RESmENtIAL& ATHENS REIMS D4FMSTRUCNRE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 3ATHRPLO (m) RETMEMENT ASSOCIATED WITH RESmENTW. ATHENS REPLACE SYSTEM B.IPROVEMENIS-REPLACE DISTWCT OIFRASIRUCIT3RE SERVICE LBVES 3BRYRETG (789) REUREEMNTOFSERVICELD9F5 RESDENML& BRYAN REIMS DIFRASTRUC COMMER DISTRICT )BRYRPLG (11629) RETRLIDIET4TASSOCGTED WITH RESDENRAL BRYAN REPLACE SYSTEMA4ROVEMENTS-�a DISTIUCT A'FMSTRUCTURE SERVICE LM 3BWDRETCi (4,136) RLTMFt.DNTOFSFRVICEL RESDENTIAL& BROWNWOOD RETME UOFRASIRUC COEO.¢RCIAL DMMCT 3BWD1@LG (T53) RETMEE4NTASSOCTA'fEOWTIH RESDENRAL BROWN D REPLACE SYSTEM B.MROVEMENTS-REPLACE DISTRICT NPRASTRUCTURE SERVICE LM 3CLEREIG (m) RETMEMENTOFSERVICELBi89 RESIDENTIAL& CLEBURNE RETIRE DIFMSTRUCNRE CONAffItCLV. D]STRICT 3CLERPLG (855) RETMEIDPI'IASSOCIATED WITH RFSDEM'IA1. CL®URNS REPLACE SYSTEMTMPROVEEIFMS-REPLACE WRTRIC-I' MFRASTRUCIURE SERVICE LB4ES 3COMETIR0 (3.136) SYSTMMNTASSOQATFDWITH ALL SYSTEM-WDE PRESSIME MONITORING SYSTEMIMPROVEMENTS-PIIRCNASE CUSTOMERS CONAIUNICA1lNG PRESSLR3E RECORDERS 3DENRETG (176) RETMEbmHTOF SERVICE LU2ES INFRASTRUCTURE COMMERCW. D151RiCI 3DEJ02PLG (1,1]0) RETMEM1IDiTASSOCIATEDWTO3 RFSDENTTAL DE3TTON REPLACE SYSTEMA OVEMENTS-REPLACE DISIIULT BO'RAS112UCNRE SERVICELMS Page 151 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 152 of 165 D89CRHTION O PHO.IF.CTBPTACED DI GAS UTIUSY PROTECT PLANS W SERVICE OR RETIXED CUSTomm NOAOlR COST DU G 2 BENEFRED LOCATION PDRPOSEOEPRO 3OLSRETG (9,266) RETRtEb¢TOFSERVICELLVES RESDENTW.& DALLAS REFIRE B3FRASTRUCTISRE COMMERCLV. DISTRICT 3DM"LO (30304) REDREEffN SOCIATEDWRH RFSDENTIAL DALLAS REPLACE SYSTEM ROVEMENTS-REPLACE DISTRICT WFRAS7RUCURH SERVICE LOIES 3EASRETO (1.567) RETIXFb1ENTOFSEWa LM RESDENTW,& EASTLAND R£TDtE DTFRASTRUCURE COMSIER DISTRICT 3]AULO (379) ItETiRETff1lTASSOCLIT®WITH RESDENTW. EASTLAND REPLACE SYSTEMP 0VEMEMS-REPLACE DISTRICT MFRASTRUCURE SEAVICELW 31FWNRETG (5,156) RETHUR.ffNTOFSERVICELWEE RESDENTW.& FT WORTH REIIRE DRItASTRUCURE COhAIDtC1AL NORTH DISTRICT 3FWNRPLG (16,697) RETIXEI.fESTASSOCIATEDWTOI RFSIDRNTIAL FT WORTH REPLACE SYSTEM UtPHOVEMENTS - REPLACE NORTH DiFRASIRUCURE SERVICELINES DISTRICT 3FWSRETG (3,232) RET@EAO USERVICEL RESDENTUU.& FTWORTH RETB3E BhRABTRUCURE LV� SOUTH DIS3R 3F'NSRPLO (24,372) RE[DtEM1IDTC ASSOCIATFDWTDf RESmENHAL FT WORTH REPLACE SYSTETA SOUTH Di FMSTRUC113RE SEeViCELINES DISTRICT 30PRRETO (1W) RE5@E6f 01FSERVICEII RESDEN'ML& DESOTO RETBtE ]NFRASPINCTURE COSO++>ERRCTAL DISTRICT 30PRRPLO (888) REMESIDiTASSOCIATEDWTU RESDENNAL DMOM REPLACE SYSTEM DISTRICT TNFRABTRUCTURE SERVICELINES ]GRNRETO C2.459) RE[IXEM1ffNI'OF SERVICELDffSRPSDENHAL& GRFJ]dWLLE RETIRE HiFRaS1RUCTURE MMIVIERi DISTRICT 30RNRPLG (3,344) REfDtEI.fENTASSOCIA7IDWTIN RES]DENIW. GREENVdLE REPLACE SYSTEMP OVEMFMS-REPLACE DISTRICT N'FRASTRUCURE SERVICE LWES 35DiBRETCi (1,191) RET@ETIENTUMRMCELB RESDEM]AL&HER DISTRICT RETIXE DIFMSTRUCHRtE COMSffItCW. 31 E MG (5,120) RET@ESIENTASSOCIATED WITH RESDENML NEB DISTRICT RFPLRCE SYSTEM WROVE s - REPLACE DIFRASTRUCURE SERVICE LD 3IRVRETG (615) REMENETTOFSERV[CELBJES RESDENTIAL& Mt G RETIRE DiFRASTRUCTURE COA4AER DISTRICT 3BtVRPLG (2,567) RETIXEMENTASSOCIATEDWRH RESDE ABHENE REPLACE SYSTEM ]WROVEMENTS-REPLACE DISTRICT DiPMSTRUCURE SERVICE LH 3RERRETG (967) RETIXEMF]l UMRWMLM RE9DENTW.& RE WLLE RETDtE OTFRASTRUCURE COMMERCIAL DISTWCT Page 152 of 165 • • 11 ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DMSION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 153 of 155 DES ON OF COWUnD PROJECTS Pe CED Ol GAS UTRA3Y PROJECT PLANT FN SRRVSCE OR PETTRRD CUSTO� NO3.®ER COSF DURWG]Om EENEFRED LOCATION PURPOSEOFPROBRCT 3RERRPL0 (1.0.52) RET82EMEN'TASSOCIATED WRH RESmENT1A1. RE MLE REPLACE SYST IWROVFMFNTS-REPLACE DIME INFRASBUCNRE SERVICE LWES SLGVRETO (037) RETIXpHENTOFSE WMLD RESmENTW.t MER RETRIE ORRASTRUCTURE COMMERCU.L DISTRICT MGVRPLO (690) REMEM1ffNTASSOCNTEDWITD RESmEMIAL MFR REPLACE SYSTEM A4ROVE8fENI$-REPLACE DISTRICT IDIFRASTRUCNRE 38fElERSG (1.M359) REfIXEBfr]JTASSOCIATEDWTH3 AL1 SYSTEM -WIDE SYSTEMS MSIONDUE SYSTFASTMPRO�S-PURCHASE NSTOBffRS TDCUSTOMFRGROWTH GASME RS 3MSQRM (452) RETDtEbIDlTOFSERVICEL09E4 RESmENTW.t GARLAND RET83E WWTRUCTURE C08A1WtCIAI DLSDUCT 3MSQMG (3,862) REMII.ffMASSGCiAtIDV/IT31 RESmFNDAI. GARLAM3 REPLACE SYSTEM U@R0VE6ffiMS-RFP m DISTRICT DIFRASTRUL'ISIRE SERVICE LO 3PARRETG (788) RLTD3EA¢NTOFMVICELWES RESIDENTWLt PARIS REM£INFRASU[UCIURE COeD,DGtCW. DISTRICT 3PARRPLG (1,241) REl1REMEM'ASSOCIATED WITH RESIDENTIAL PARIS REPLACE SYSTEA62MPROVEN4M8-REPLACE DISTRICT DJFRASGtuC WRVICELINFS 31?LARETO (426) REf➢tEL4TTOF SIMAMLLM RESIDENTIAL & %.ANO Rk"HRS PNRASTRUCNRE C08Dr c0. DISTRICT 3PLARPLG (6,517) RETREA4NTASSOCIAIEDWRH RESmEN7rer PIANO REPLACE SYSTEM RiPROVEMENTS-REPLACE DISTRICT IW'MSTRUCT(Me SERVICE LD 3REGULTG (324,246) REIAF.AffNT ASSOCGMWffH RESIDENTW.t SYSTFM-WIDE SYSTEM FRPANSION DUE SYSTIIAD.WROVEM1mMS-PURCHASE C084+ID3 TOCUSTONRAGROWTH GAS REGULATORS 3RWOlETG (416) RETIXFMENTOFSERVICELGBFS RESIDENTI & ROUNI3RO RETRBE WFRASTRUC COBIDffR DISIWCT 3RRIGtPLG (0.4) REfptFbgNl'ASSOCIATFD WITH RESmFNML ROUNDROCR REPLACE SYSTEMD.iPROVEMEMS-REPLACE DIME DSFRA4IRUC SERVICELWES 35ANRETO (683) REIR[ENO:NTOFSE WV LD RESmENTW.t SANANGELO RETIRE D✓FRASTRUCRSRE COAAfERns9 DISTRICT 3SANRPLG (3.$38) RLTR8E85EMASSOCIATED WITH RESmENHAL SANANGEIA REPLACE SYSIEAf D.1PROVEAffNI'S-REPLACT: DISTRICT G9FMSTRIILILRE MRVICEL08ES 3SWEREIG (373) RETDtE1dETTOFSERV10EL RES]D N & SWEETWAM RET83E PIFRAMUC COIA.4RCLV. DISTRICT 3SWERPLG (635) IiETDtEi.4]lPAS50CWTED WITH RESIDEM4U. SWEERVATFR REPLACE SY3TEfA OVEAffN1S-REPLACE DISTWCT P2FRASTRUCTURE SER QLP 3TFI. 0 (1,739) RE[DtEMLNi OF SERVICE LWFS RESIDENOALt TEMPLE RETGeE DeFRASTRUC COMMERCW. DISTWCT Page 153 of 155 • • • ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 Page 154 of 155 DFS on aF iB15 PRO3EOT5PLACED W GASUPIIIIV PROdEf.T PLAN MWRVICEORRE=D CUSF06 m NUABER COST DUIWSG 30(e BENEFTIED LOCATION PURPOSEOFPRO3ECT 1TFMRPI.0 MM) REFDtESffNTASSOCIATE a l RESIDENTIAL TEMPLE REPLACE SYSTEMniPROVEEffNFS-REPLACE DISTRICF INFRASTRUCRJRE SERVICE JTERRETG Nast REMENDN'FOFSEEtVlaLIN]M& TERRELL REfDtE nRRASTRUCTURE mnD.mlcw. nlsTwcr 3TFARPL0 Iva) REFDtENffNFASSOCIATIDWITH RESIDEHITAL TTRRELt REPLACE SYSTEMD.@ROVEMENTS-REPLACE DISTRICT DIFMSTRUCILRtE SERVICELDIES 3TF]OIETG (1,607) RETIXEMENFOFSERVICELBJES RESIDFMiAL6 TIXOMA RETIRE DD'RASTRUCNRE COMMERCW. DLSTRICT 3TE%RPLO (5.553) RETIXEhII:NTASSOCIA3IDWIIH RESIDENTIAL TEROMA REPLACE SYSTEM 0.IPROVELffi s -REPLACE DISMa TNFRASTRUCIURE SERVICE LWFS 3WACREIO (3.535) REFIXEM FOFSERVICELWES RESD)EN]LLL$ WACO RETIRE DDRASIRUCRIRE COFID4RCIAL DISTRICT 3WACRPLG (&897) REIWEIIffNIASSOCTATIDWITH RESIDFN)lA1- WACO REPLACE SYSI}M OVEMENI3-REPLACE DISTRICF DD'RASTRUCNRE 5ERVICE LINES 3WARRETO (Lm) REMII.1ENIOFSERVICELDJES RESIDENDAL& WAXAHACHSE RETIRE WFRASOtUCTURE COhR4]tCTAt DISTRICT 3WAIOVLO (I.W) RETIREBDNFASSOCTATEDWUH RFSIDEN'ML WARAHA REPLACE SYSTEM NBROVENDNI3-REPLACE DLSTRICT D9FRPSTRUCNRE SERVICE LWFS 3WFSREIG (3,895) RETIREMENFOFMWCELDIES RESIDEN'ML& WICInTA RETRE DD'RASTRUCIllRE C MNIERC FALLS DISMR 3WFSRPLG (5,W3) REIRtEMEEFFASSOCTATm \V5I}I RESIDENILU. WICHRA REPLACE SYSTEM OVEMIM3-REPLACE FALLS E9FMSIRIICIlIRE SERVICELn DISTRICF AMPOWRPL (109.07) RETTREhffNTASSOCIATEDWIIH ALL Cq.LEG6 REC IFICATION OF TRANSFER OF MGH PRESSURE MTOMFRS STATION ASSETS SERVWGTHET SA&MPOWER BRYANACI (II,T16) REIiREMEM ASSOCIATED WITH ALL BRYAN BUDDINGRAND PROPERTY OVE4NI5- CUSTOM SERVICE AflROVETffM3 RFPLACEAIXCONDIIW Gl CFMFR BRYPRRLT (9") AEHREMENFASSOCTATIDWRH ALL BRYAN BUDDDIGRAND PROPERTYD.IPROVEMENT3- CUSTOMLRS SERVSCE IWROVEMEHIS RESURFACEPARRDJGLOT CENTER BIMThTRT (4;M] REIDtEMENT ASSOCIATED WISH ALL BURNET B=WGILAND BU WGIMPROVEMINFS CU5FOA4A5 OFFICE NIPROVp.ffiNTS M 33D (Idm) RCIIREMEM ASSOC =WITH ALL SYSTEM -WIDE PRFSSUREMON RTNG SVSTPMIMPROVEMENTS-RJSTALL CIISTONIERS PRESSURE CONTROL E IRPbff11T hffTR00MT (10.666) REfIXEN1ENIAS50CGTED WITH ALL SYSTEM -WIDE FIELD NEEDS SVSTEMIAIPROVA¢M$-PURCHASE CUSTOMERS RAD105ERVICEMONROR mm6666 (36,155) REIIXE1ffPTA5SOCIATED WIIII AL1 DALLAS REPIXE A'FMSTRUCNRE REMDIGMPASURA'GSTATION CUSTOAfERS POLYISVC (155) RET021MEETF ASSOCIATED WITH ALL SYSFEM-WIDE REPLACE SYSTEMD OVET¢NIS-REPLACE CUSTOMERS LNFRASTRUC SERVICE LMET Page 154 of 155 Cl 11 0 ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION GAS RELIABILITY PROGRAM TARIFF FILING PROJECT REPORT 2003 TOTAL (030.181) RL FOR 2 M8 F 1003 C6mgew Nel 93(195A62 Plan[ •CUSTOhffA COUNT AS OF DECEMBER 31,2004: RE4RIENTLV. CUSTOMERS: 1.343.101; COhIDfER CUSTOMERS: 14032; NDOSIRW. NSTOMERS: Or Page 155 of 155 DESCRBTION OF COWUnD PDO.IECIS PLACED DI GAS] H]LIIY PROJECT PLANT N` SERVICE OR RLTIXED CUSToA NIIfSIDEI COST DU G1003 BENF.FTIED LOCATION PURPOSEOFPROBRLT RETRADDT (161.031) RETIXEM14] WFAC[LITOSS-REFIRE ALL SYSTEM -W E REDRE DJFR MUCTURE DORASTRUCNRE CUSi0003t$ RRKBCKGT (2.%3) RETDtEN1E8ITA390CIATEO WITH ALL ROUNDROCR BMD04GM1 MOPMTYDOROVEE¢MS- CUSTOMERS SERVICE p ROVEbiEN33 REPLACE GATE CENTER RRKGENRT (3,598) RET03E0IDTTASSOCIATIDWTIH ALL ROUNDROCK FORDISTALLATION, TOOLSANDEQU@AtENT-PURCHASE CUSTOMERS DISTRICF MAMIETIANCF,ANDAEP GENE MRFORGASCREWS OF FACD.IT164 RRKSRODF (48.M) REDREAffIV'I ASSOCIATED WffH ALL ROUNDROCK BUO.DD4GRAND PROPERTY R.IPROVEMENFS- CUSTOMERS SERVICE MROVEMENTS REPLACE ROOF CENTER iEMGENIR (3,380) iTY53¢t.TASSOOATEDWRH pLL TEODLE FORDISTALLATION, TOOLSANDEQUD84NT-PURCHASE CUSTOMERS DL4TRICT MAlN3ET1ANCE,ANDREP GENERATORFORGASCREWS OF FACdO TH.IPLEAC (2,413) REFDIEI.¢HFA$SOCIAT®WITH ALL TBT(PLF BIRLDDiG/LMD PROPERTYP ROVF2A3NTS- CUSTOMERS SERVICE AffROVET4 s RFPLACEAIRCONDRIONDoG CENTER (13,205) REGRE04NFASSOCIATEDWOH ALL SFOONMN BU DD10A.AN0 PROPERTVD.iPROVEA¢NPS- CUSTOMERS SERVICE D ROVEA4NT5 REPLACE CONDR10 GUNK CENFFR E -c (14,885) REITRII..U;TT9T ASSOCIATED WITH ALL WICHITA BURAwoG m PROPERTY�OVELffN CUSTOMERS FALLS MROVELDMB II REPLACE AR2 CONDMONDIG UNIT SERVICE CENTER TOTAL (030.181) RL FOR 2 M8 F 1003 C6mgew Nel 93(195A62 Plan[ •CUSTOhffA COUNT AS OF DECEMBER 31,2004: RE4RIENTLV. CUSTOMERS: 1.343.101; COhIDfER CUSTOMERS: 14032; NDOSIRW. NSTOMERS: Or Page 155 of 155 • ATTACHMENT 2 MUNICIPAL ACTIONS LIST OF CITIES/rO WN DENYING INTERIM RATE REQUEST • 0 Citv/Town Name Date Denied ALLEN 1 7/12/2005 ARGYLE 7/12/2005 BELLMEAD 7/1212005 BLUE RIDGE 7/5/2005 BOWIE 7/19/1005 BURKBURNETT 7/18/2005 CARROLLTON 715/2005 CEDAR HILL 7/12/2005 CLYDE 7/12/2005 COLORADO CITY 7/12/2005 CORRAL CITY 7/1212005 DENISON 7/18/2005 DESOTO 7/19/2005 DUNCANVILLE 7/19/2005 ENNIS 7/18/2005 FARMERSVILLE 7112/2005 GAINESVILLE 7/19/2005 GRAND PRAIRIE 7/19/2005 HARKER HEIGHTS 7/12/2005 HASLET 7/11/2005 HEATH 7/7/2005 HONEY GROVE 7/11/2005 KRUM 7/7/2005 LAKE WORTH 7/12/2005 LEWISVILLE 7/11/2005 LITTLE ELM 7/19/2005 MALAKOFF 7/1'112005 MIDLOTHIAN 7112/2005 PANTEGO 7/11/1005 PARIS 7/11/2005 PECAN HILL 7/19/2005 PONDER 7/11/2005 ROANOKE 7/12/2005 ROBINSON 7/12/2005 ROWLETT 6/21/2005 SAGINAW 7/5/2005 SEAGOVILLE 7/21/2005 SHERMAN 7/18/2005 STAMFORD 7/5/2005 THE COLONY 7/11/2005 WOODWAY 7/11/2005 WYLIE 7/12/2005 ORDINANCE NO. 2421-7-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALLEN, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION, MID-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABnXTY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN TITIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF TBE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION, MD.-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION As PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION, MID-TEX DIVISION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. • WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corporation, Mid -Tex Division, (the "Company") filed with the City of Allen ('City's, a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104.301 for an annus! gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system; and, WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request n it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(6) and 103.001; and, WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed raft increase; and, WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Allen to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ("Commission"), said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC"), in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and, WHEREAS, the Gu Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and, WBEREAS, the Texas Utilities Cade § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company, and, • WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends fording that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104-30 1) either in fact or in law; and, • WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased per -customer investment in infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and, WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 ova that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and, WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and, WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corporation's current capital structure, wbiobjustifies a Iowa rate of return; and, WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further over-eaming by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and, WHEREAS, in consideration of the city taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALLEN, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS, THAT: • SECTION 1. The Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be mjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following. (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its per -customer investment in infrastructure in calendar yea 2003; (e) approval of the Company's GRIP request would result in ova -earning by the Company in the yea of implementatim and (t) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. SECTION Z. The City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. SECTION 3. The Company, upon submission from ACSC, shall promptly reimburse the reasonable costs associated with the ACSC's activities related to the proposed GRIP Rate Increases SECTION 4. The City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the City's action £dad az the Commission and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTION 5. It is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said • meeting was given as required Ordinance No. 2421-7-05 Page 2 • SECTION 6. A copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corporation, Mrd -Teat Division, Lincoln Center E, 186 Floor, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage and publication of the caption m accordance with the provisions of the charter ofthe City of Allen, and it is accordingly so ordained DULY PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALLEN, COIM COUNTY, TEXAS, ON THIS THE I27 DAY OF RC, 2005. APPRO'YT:,D AS TO FORM: 6-= 4'Q. Peter G. Smith, C ATTORNEY La • APPROVED: Staph'—�eu.IcmeO, ATTEST: She ey B. Georg C, CITY SECRETARY Ordinance No. 2421-7-05, Page 3 James Johnson 8175775497 p.14 ORDINANCE NO. 2005-12 DENYING ATMOS' GRI' REQUEST AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ARGYLE, TEXAS DENYING TISK REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP, MID-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFR4SIRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIN MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE TOWN'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVH)ING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WINCH TffiS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRID BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MOD-TEX DIVISION. W1iERFAS, on or about Demmber 17, 2004, Alinas Energy Corp, Mid -Tex Division • (the "Company') filed with the Town of Argyle ('Town'), a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104301 for an annual W reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until Match 4, 2005, for some cities on its system; and WHEREAS, the Town has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the Town, pursuant to Teens Utilities Code §§ 102.001(b) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the Town timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed rate increase; and WH]EREAS, it is reasonable for the Town of Argyle to eoeperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ('Commission'), said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Committee (' :ACSC'), in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHERE 4S, the On Utility RegulatoryAct grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the Town in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and 0 James Johnson 8175775497 p.15 • WHEREAS, ACSC'a ram case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company, and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Ceras Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law; and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased per -customer investment in infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in CUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rarha than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, wluchjustifies a lower rate of return; and WTIEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that • implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result it further over -earning by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS. in consideration of the Town taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ARGYLE, TEXAS: SECTION]. That the Company's GRIP ram increase request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its per -Customer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the Company's GRIP request would result in over -earning by the Company in the year of implementation; and (f) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. 11 James Johnson 6175775497 P.16 SECTION 2. That the Town is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the Tower regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance in the Commission. SECTION 3. Thin the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the Town is audwrized to intervene in any appeal of the Town's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. SECTION & That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Oniinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. SECTION 7. That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid - Tex Division, Lincoln Center Il, 186 Floor, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240. • DULY PASSED and approved by the Town Council of the Town of Argyle, Tcxas, on this the 12P day of July, 2005. AusdAPED. Tucker, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Codi Delcambre, To"Secretary Matthew Boyle, Town Attorney 0 Jul -22-2006 11:4Tsa FrOa-Mrl ENERGY 12546627400 T-616 F.002/003 F-009 • ORDI VICE A NAS -002 AN ORDINANCE OF TME CITY OF BELLMFAD, TEXAS, DENYING ATMOS ENERGY CORP.. N D-TEX DiVLSION'S REQUEST FOR AN .' TNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE VILOGRAM RATE. ADJUSTMENT IN THE CITY CIE BELLMEA'D SO THAT THE COMPANY AIAY PURSUE A SYS7E2,1-WIDE A?^TTU.&L GA•SS RELLABILITY INFRA- STRUCT--JRE PROGRAM RATE M)JUSTMENT WITH THE RAILROAD CONS MSSION OF TEXAS; PROVIDING AN EMC MME DATE; FINDFdG TILL`." THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS OYiDINANCE IS PASSER IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUI]A SD BY LAW; PLAID FROVIDiNG FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDS M ZC'� TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MMTEX DIVISi0.11. Whereas. ra or abo:tt October ' 20M, Antics )energy Corporation merged with TXU Gas GFIapa`sy; and Wherea:,. Amtos Energy Ccrn,— Mid -Tex Divtsion (the 'Company") mw operates the dis:i9 -intim systes t that w -u{ 1brmerly operated by TXU Gas Company; and ® Whereas. on or abcut Leo --tuber 17, 2C04, the C npmy filed with the City Manager of ttur 1.i".y of 'rleilntpad. T. ,s (the "City") a request for an annual gas reliability ink? miffe program rate F4ustakeat for Customers on the Company's system -wide dhs,.h ton sy'6zem; and Wheex s. lie ,itybas on,ktal J:u1st ;Ctlay to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to cusel•icr of the Company =,ird from tete distribution facilities located within the Cityand 103.001; NOW : 417'4LE.F0RE, BU IT 1XID-00D BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF @ F L'[;A'I ..kD„ TEX.Af! Section__ =. "That the Gompav;'F request for an annual gas reliability infrastructure =^r.r rd'+ts[rtau with res-ctt ;r mskimers sewed from the Company's distribution fa aji :s iocat:d inside the City, as psit of the Cortpany's system -wide gas utility system, is d.nrd in all rssr>r,Ts. 5ecdo. i'h `t .1 '5 0,%fvraucr. shall he come effecdoo from and after its passage, as the lay. ani charter inr,w:h cases orrvlde. C� Jul -22-2006 11 Was F,m Ad e'' "HE:OT 12:46627400 T-616 P103/003 F-009 • 'r iat i cup,, Of dd., cdinaac% wasrituting fmal action on the Company's rec:,.,, F>r an emu.l Das n;lia�iiy in@'strwtune program rate adjustment, sbaU be fotwan%a. to the Company's de:,ipzted -repres native within ten day after final passage at the f:11 rwing ad2hxss::ticbard R.is, Atmos Ener6y Corp., Mid -Tea Division, 300 S. St Paul `AI xt, e' Floor; Dallas, T:: 7 2 f l . F -IL IIL Passed and appm. on th.= Fstx day of June, 20+05. }iP. WL?LNIEAD TEXAS B} Mayor Attest: .1 CiN, etre arg Passed and appac,--d on the secon.,! reuiLi.;111-15 12'" day of July, 2005. Tim CITY C,P NdEAD. TEXAS i By Yo—or Pro-tcm r^ � City Secretar;' Passed anal appy ed oa ike third Txadin vns 12"day of July, 2005. Attest: Achy t\ erary 'FiE CFTY' ' .MEAS?, TEXAS i 13y May it F tem • 19035914249 70:912142062131 P.2 JU-AL-2005 09:49 8A FRI-ETa4�t T0: 19038914245 Pie 3UL-19-2005 10:288 FRIMCITY OF BLUE RIDGE 972-752-93E8 CITY OF BLUE RIDGE ORDINANCE 2005-0705 DENYING ATMOS' GRIT' REQUEST AN ORDINANCE OF THE CTTY OF BLUE RIDGE_. TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP, MID -TE% DTVISTON, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE. INCREASE 1N THIS MUNTCIPALM, A5 A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTHdTY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH TIE H OTHER CIS WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRTBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; .4UTHORTZUNC INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; • APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTSi FENDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH TWS ORDINANCE 1S PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID -TEN DIVISION - WHEREAS, on or about Docember 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Md -Tex Division, (the "Company') riled with coo City of Blue Ridge ("City), n reques± pursuant to Tete Utilities Code § 104.301 for an annual gas milability infmanuctu a program (GRIP) ate inettxse for customers on the Compatly s statewide gas un'lity system to he effective February, 15, 2005, and subsequently es"ded that effective dam until March 4, 2005. for some cities on its system; and WHEREAS, the City bas exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the COMPN •'s requea us it Pertains w the distribution faeilitles tueated within the City: Pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(6) end 105.001; and WI-IEREAS, the City, timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed tea increase; and W HF.REAS, it is reasonable for the City of Blue Ridge To wop=W with ether cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's Sling at the Railroad Commission • 2W5-0703Wrdiroare 1 JLL-19-2005 09:34Rr1 FPx:972 752 9163 ID:9-ER'YN PRGE:002 R -95x iLL-19-2695 89:49 FROM:9� 19036914249 TO: 912142862131 P.3 > :r W PIM;UM OF ELLE RIDSE 972-752-916e TO:1903e914249 P:3 • ("Commission'), said coalition being known as .Atmos Cities Steering Committee C'ACSC7, in any appeal of the cities' actions t0 the Commission; and WHEREAS. the Cas Utility Regulatory Aa gazers local regulatory autbCniucs the right to intervene in tate proceedings filed ai the Raihoad Commission; and WIMMAS, the Texas Utilities Code $ 103.022 provides thin costs incurred by the City in ratinnaking activities are m be reimbursed by the regulated utility: and WHE:RE.•S. ACSC's rate ease expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be ecimhurred by the Company: and WTIERE.AS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company -s filing and upon ennsultation with various consultanu, recommends finding dun the Compmy's proposal is unjustified, unmasrmablc and it not in compliance with the GRIP swtute (Texas Utilities Code § 104.30t) either in fact or in law; and WTIMM-AS, inNnnation provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased percusu mer investment in �$asttuetme during calendar year 2003; and WHEREA% the Company has publicly stated than it will receive substantial profit in 2005 ova that approved by the Commission in GM No. 9400: and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails in account for growth in cambers of customer, thereby undercouming the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rine incre ash and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fells to recognize dm GUD No. 9400 rates included lnefn based on TXU Corporation's capiral structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, which justifies a lower rate of retum; and WHEREAS, the infomation reviewed by the .ACSC eonsulumts indicates that Implementation of the Company's GRIP request mWd result in further over-ciaing by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in comideration of the city taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP regtresL the Company bas agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, Tl$REIrORE, BE IT ORDAINL•D BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BLUE 1 IST GE , TEXAS: SECTION i. 'That the Company's GRIP rate inacase requen is Pound to be urOttsiiHcd, unrcawaable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request include, but are not limited in. the fallowing: (a) the Company improperly 4 2005-070510,dmance .ALL-19-EOW 09:34PA FAX:TM 752 9160 ID:9 PRGE4003 R=951. r 1 U JLL-19-2005 09:49 FROM SHERIP04 19038914249 T0:912142062131 PA JUL-19-200S 10:228 FR@1:C1TY lF BLUE RIDE 972-752-9160 T0:19=914249 PA calculated is 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its caiculation projects unrelated to System improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the iurreased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer Wrowth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that The Company actually decreased its per-cusmmsr investment in inEtsrructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the Company's GRr request would result in over -earning by the Company in the year of implementation; and (f) the Company has failed to dernonstrate that it meets the sWUM%,,• prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP statute continues a constitutional application of the statute. SECTION 2. That the City is authorized to coopemm with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultauts, negotiate witb the Company, make recommendation to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation ussoeiated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. SLLCYION 3. That the costs incwr.A by ACSC in reviewing the Company's rFJP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall he prnmp0y reimbursed by the Company. SUCTION 4. That the Cit; is authorized to inmrvene in any appeal of the city's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall be== effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases pmvlda. SECTION 6. That 4 is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinmrx: is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting wee; given as required, SECTION 7. That a copy of this ordiumee, coastiutung final action on the Company's application, shell be forwarded to the appropriau designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Maniac; Cn Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid- Tcx Division. Lincoln Center IT, 18° Flom, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Da:las, Texas, 75240. DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council of the City of Blue Ridgii, Texas, on thus the Se day of�July_, 2D05. OV , r ATTTST: • 2W7.070110rdinwre 3 JUL-1.9-2005 09:34FM FW!972 752 9160 ID: SH RPM PR(E:004 R=95e • ORDINANCE 2005-10 ORDINANCE DENYING ATMOS' GRD' REQUEST AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOWIE, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DMSION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION. • WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, (the "Company'l filed with the City of Bowie, a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104.301 for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system ; and WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(b) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed rate increase; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Bowie to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission (``Commission" ), said coalition being (mown as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ('ACSC"), in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and 1668\12\0rdinance I • WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company; and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consuljation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law; and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased per -customer investment in infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, which justifies a lower rate of return; and • WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further over-eaming by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and 11 WHEREAS, in consideration of the city taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOWIE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its per -customer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the Company's GRIP request would result in overeaming by the Company in the year of implementation; and (f) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory 1668\12\Ordiaaace • prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rete increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. SECTION 2. That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consuljants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. SECTION 3. That the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the city's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. SECTION 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. • SECTION 7. That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid - Tex Division, Lincoln Center II, 18'" Floor, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240. DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council of the City of Bowie, Texas, on this the 19th day of t,ny, , 2005. APD ATTEST: `�2• w/,P�p. • APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney 1668\12\Ordinance ORDINANCE NUMBER 700 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURKBURNETT, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MDI-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS • ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION. WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, (the "Company'l filed with the City of Burkbumett ("City"), a request for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and • WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(6) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Burkbumett to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ("Commission'), said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC'J, in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and 1668\12\0rdinance • WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable; and WHEREAS, contrary to statements in the Company's GRIP filing, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information shows that the Company actually decreased investment in infrastructure for calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 ova that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, which justifies a lower rate of return; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF 4ISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF BURKBURNETT, TEXAS: • SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unreasonable and is therefore denied in all respects. The unreasonableness of the request includes the following: (a) the Company decreased its investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (b) even without the proposed GRIP rate increase, the Company expects profits well in excess of those approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; (c) the Company's GRIP calculations fail to account for customer growth in the system; and d) the Company's GRIP filing fails to recognize the markedly different capital structure of the Company from that considered in GUD No. 9400. SECTION 2. That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of a rate ordinance and the rate case filed at Commission. SECTION 3. That the costs incurred by the City in reviewing the Company's GRIP request shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the city's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its • passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. 1668\12\0rdinance • SECTION 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. SECTION 7. A copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, 300 S. St. Paul Street, Suite 8-113 EC, Dallas, Texas, 75201. C� • PASSED AND APPROVED on this 181° day of July 2005. ATTEST: Ao T, Holley, City Se etary 1668\12\0rdinance Owli�0 Bill Vincent, Mayor E ORDINANCE NO 2977 ORDINANCE DENYING ATMOS' GRD' REQUEST AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY O CARROLLTO TEXAS ENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIR LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; • FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION. WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, (the "Company's filed with the City of Carrollton ('City), a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104.301 for an annual gas reliability, infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system ; and WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(b) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos's proposed rate increase; and WIiEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Carrollton to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission • ("Commission'), said coalition being (mown as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC'), in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and 1666\12\0rdlnance • C, J Otd 2977 WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company; and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law; and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased per -customer investment in infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company bas publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, which justifies a lower rate of return; and WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in father aver-eaming by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the city uddng action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to file any additional GRIP • requests before September 15, 2005. 1668\12\Ordinance • Ord. 2977 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARROLLTON, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its per - customer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the Company's GRIP request would result in over -earning by the Company in the year of implementation; and (f) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. • SECTION 2. That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. SECTION 3. That the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the city's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. • SECTION 5. 1668\12\0rdinaace Ord. 2977 •. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. SECTION 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. SECTION 7. That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gras Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, Lincoln Center II, 18" Floor, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240. DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council of the City of . Texas, on this the 5th day of July, 2005. • _. APPROVED: r -IL APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attome 1668\12\Ordwance • ORDINANCE NO. i005-243 ATMOS' GRIP REQUEST DENIAL AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CEDAR HILL, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DMSION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION. • WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Cedar Hill to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ("Commission's, said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC'�, in my appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and • WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, (the "Company') filed with the City of Cedar Hill ("City's, a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104.301 for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system ; and WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(b) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed rate increase; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and 1668\12\0rdinsnce • WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company, and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas -Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law; and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased per -customer investment in infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates • included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, which justifies a lower rate of return; and WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further over-eaming by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the city taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CEDAR HILL, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its per -customer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the • Company's GRIP request would result in over -earning by the Company in the year of 1668XU\Ordimnce • implementation; and (f) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory prerequisites'to'quatify f6i a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. - r� SECTION 2: -That the City is authorized to cooperateq with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. - SECTION 3. That the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to, intervene in any appdal of the city's iction filed at the Commission-, and to peaticipafe'in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. .. SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. SECTION 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the • time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. SECTION 7. That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid- . Tex Division, Lincoln Center 11, 18t° Floor, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240. DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council of the City of Cedar Hill, Texas, on this the 12th day of July, 2005. Z rank , Ma r L = ATTEST: AA Frankie Lee, City Secretary My Attorney 1668\12\Ordinance 07/20/2005 10:23 FAX 13257343104 In GAS-ABILENE doo5 ?.Does - 005 ORDINANCE DENYING ATMOS' GRIP REQUEST AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLYDE, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MD]-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELL4BILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE LVCREASE IN THIS MUMCIPALTTY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILM DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITII OTHER CITIES w'ITEIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE C1TY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT TILE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION. • WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, (the "Company') filed with the City of Clyde, Texas, a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104,301 for an annual gas reliability iufrestructure program (GRIP) rate increase for eustomets on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system; and WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(6) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the ei}bctive data of Atmos' proposed rate increase; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Clyde to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ("Commission'), said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Commitee ("ACSC'), in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides tbat costs incurred by the City in r,u m diDS activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and 0 1668%1Z0rd15W- UT/ZU/ZUUS 10:23 k'Aa 1JZ5734J1U4 1$U tiAJ-a6L1 M QUUe tWHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company; and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of 1110 Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, necon mesuls finding that the Company's Proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104-301) either in fact or in law; and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased per -customer investuem in infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to aeeormt for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s cuaent capital structure, which justifies slower rate ofrelttrn; and WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implementation of the Company's GEP request would result in further over -earning by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the city taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GP P request, the Company has agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLYDE, TEXAS; SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increaser request is found to be tntjusdfleA unreasonable, and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its pec -customer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the Company's GRIP request would result in over -caning by the Company in the year of implememstion; and (f) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory 0 166MIZC manta 07/20/2005 10:23 FAX 13257743104 T%U GAS-ABILENE it007 • prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation ofthe GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. SECTION 2. That the City is autb0rized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appesl of this ordinance to the Counnission- SECTION 3. That the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this Proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appy of the City's action filed at the Commission, snd to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, m the law and charter in such cases provide. SECTION 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. • SECTION 7- That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, sball be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid - Tex Division, Lincoln Center IC, 18" Floor, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240 - DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council of the City of Clyde, Texas, on this the 12th day of July, 2005. APPROVED: r— ,sW e 'v gston, Mayor 11 ATTEST: 16042Ukd'a sur j • 07/2D/2005 10:24 FAX 13237343104 TZU GAS-ABILEYE 2008 ORDINANCE NO, 2005 _ 09 DENYING ATMOS' GRIP REQUEST AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLORADO CITY, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP' MID-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP, MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSQ; AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL A.ND ULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY SAND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CTTY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APFROVING QUILE COSTS FORI PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF D AS REASONABLE AND COSTS; CH TUB ORDINANCE IS PASSEDING THATD TO O THE PUBLIC ANIEETING AT SID EDIS OPEREQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION. WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Antos Energy COP-, Ad -Tex Division, (thC "Company') fled with the City of Colorado City ("City), a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104.301 for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system ; and WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, Pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102-001(b) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed rate increase; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Colorado City to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of ©ties in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ("Commission'), said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Stecring Committee C ACSC'j, in nay appeal of the cities' actions to the commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings fled at the Railroad Com rman0q and • 1668\1210rdiamca 07/20/2005 10:24 F.4% 18257343104 M GAS-ABILEM I®DDa ® WHEREAS, the texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratcmalong activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utihty, and WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company, and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the CO1OPRuY`s1 filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law; and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests far information indicates that the Company actually decreased per -customer investment in inf[asttuenue during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUI) No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital stvcture, which justifies a lower rate of reuum; and WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further over -earning by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the city taldng action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request' the Company has agreed not to file ally additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLORADO CITY, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects- The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation project unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Comtrussion in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its percostomer investment in infiastroctum in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the Company's GRIP request would result in over-eaming by the Company in the year of 0 1668\12\Ordinance 07/20/2005 10:24 FAX 13257363104 'UU GAS—ABILE.YE mule • implementation; and (f) the Company bas farted to demonstrate that it meets the statutory prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP ram increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP stemm constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. SECTION 2. That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission SECTION 3. That the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the city's action fled at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTIONS. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. SECTION & That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the • time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. SECTION 7. T to a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp, Mid - I= Division, Lincoln Center H, le Floor, 5420 LET Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240, DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council of the City of Colorado City, Taxes, on this the 12th day of July, 2005. va. a • yd' �'I a 0 1668\12\Ordl=ce I:Ii]Sa>:fe1a.' C James Johnson B175775497 p.17 ORDINANCE 0503 DENYING ATMOS' GRIP REQUEST AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF CORRAL CITY, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., 11HD-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP, MLD-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP, MID-TEX DIVISION. • WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, (the "Company") filed with the Town of Corral Cly("City"), a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104301 for an annual gas reliability'ms'*'r"^` Pmg.'nm (GRIP) rale increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system; and WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it Pertains to The distribution facilities located witbia the City, pmauant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(6) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Attune proposed rate inaease; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the Town of Corral City to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition in the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ("Comrmssion"), said coalition being ]mown as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC"), in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and 1rK.a117N1Minencs • C James Johnson 8175775497 P.18 WHEREAS, the Texas UtBities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in rammakmg activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated Miry; and WHEREAS, ACSC's ram rase expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company; and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's Sling and upon consultation with various consniants, recommends finding that tate Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law, and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased per -customer investment in in&asnuamc during calendaryear 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to among for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undermrmtmg the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rem inzrcase; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to tecogoi= that GUD No. 9400 rates • included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s currec:t capital structue, whichiustifies a Iowa rote of return; and WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further overeaming by the Company above that approved by the Commission in OLD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in ccaaderation of the city tatting action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERh1r`T, d OF THE TOWN OF CORRAL CITY, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request is forted to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 ram base; (b) the Company included in its calculation pmjects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recogtdm the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in OLD No, 9400 and due to customer grovRh; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its percustomer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the Company's GRIP request would result in overeamirrg by the Company in the year of 1661AMOrdiam ma 0 James Johnson e1757754S7 P.15 r4 implementation; and (f) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the stimmuy prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the startle. SECTION 2. That the City is authorized to cooperate with odes Cities within the Company's DistributionSystem that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordnance: to the Commission. SECTION3. That the costs intoned by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTIGN 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the city's action filed at the Commission, andto participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such eases provide. SECTION 6. That it is hereby officially frond and determined that the meeting at which this Ord -mance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. tv SECTION 7. That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, droll be forwarded to the appropriate designated represeatative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid - Tex Division, Lincoln Center 11,196 Floor, 5420 LBI Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240. DULY PASSED and approved by the Board of Aldermen of the Town of Corral City, Texas, on this the 1.2Aday of My, 2005. APPROVED' ATT' ^ • 11111120dimIX4 SUL-21-2005 09:32 FR1)M:SHERMPN 19038914249 T0:912142062122 P.8 TUL-i0-05 16.09 PROM. to. PAGE 2/4 ORDINANCE NO. 43r2 qw AN C RDINANCE OF TU CETY OF DENISON, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQ TEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP, MM-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANN JAL GAS RELLAEILDTY INBILASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RAT;: INCREASE IN TffiS BWhrCiPAUTY, AS A PART OF THE COM PANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPI OVING COOPERATION VvTTH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATM 3S ENERGY CORP, Nidi-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSI EDI AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING CONZMEE (ACS-); AUTHORIT.ING ACSC TO HME LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERI ICES AND TO NEGOTIATE VvTTH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING I NTERVENTTON AS PAR'.' OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CTMS ACTION TO THE RAH ROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REM ONABLE AND PROVLDIlNC A REQUMEMENT FOR PROMPT REIN RURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHIG ,H TUTS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQ iHiED BY LAW; ASND PRO`Mrjo FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORD NANCE TO :ATMOS ENERGY CORP_, mm-TEX Dri'ISION. WHE :E,AS, on or about December 17, 200,, b vena F,n=Ely Corp., 1,d -Tat Division, (the "Comps .y') fled with the City of Denison ("City' ), a reque*t pursuant to Tuan Utilities Code § 104. 01 for an annual p3 ,ji&biuty inreszucttue program (GRIP) rete increase for enstonets on the Company's stareuide gas unity system to be effective Febroary 15, 2005, and subsequently �zlended that effective datcuntil Mara 4, 2005, far some cities on its system ; and WHE ;EAS, the City has exclusnv original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distthnticu faclliries located within the Ciry, Pmsuant to Texas Utilities Cod. §§ 102.001(b) and 103.00i; and WHE ;EAS, the City timely need to rasp A to effective dare of Atmos' proposed rate increase; and WHE :EAS, it is reasonable for the Ciry of Denison to coopuzate with other cities in a coalition of CFrleSinopposition to tae Compan's tiling at the Railroad Commission ("Cotmnitsio 0, said coalition being lmoum as ?-naos Cities Steering Committee C'ACSC'), in any appeal o1 the cities' actions to t:1 --commission; rid WHE .EAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory EnUrties the right to intervene in t its proceedings filed at the Raitmrvd Commission: and WHE LEAS, the ?eras Utilities Cate § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in racemate^1 r_tvities are to be ccanbvrscd by iib:: regulated miliry; and WHE ,BAS, ACSC's r-- c>s expenses incurrad in this proceeding are reasonable and should berev xbmsed by the Compal}; and 166R1t2\0nlma ca i .1tL-20-2005 03;1� FP : ID:9FERI'gN PAGE;002 R=100* JU--21-2005 09:32 FRd9:SHERrAd 19038914249 70:912142062120 P.9 .rUL-a•-0E 36.08 FROM• ID- PAGE 3/4 ® WHE tFAS, counsel for ACSC, tlpon review of the Company 5 filing and upon' emanation YAth various consWuaus, recommends &-ding that the Company's proposal is mjnstlf 4 u =asonablc and is not in comphmce Ai-th the GF -2 statute (Texas Utilities Code 104301) ei ba in fact Or in law; and WHE. LEAS, information provided by the Compely in response to ACSC's requests for infomtafiou ndioatm that the Company actually decreased per -Customer investment in i»frastntcNrc during calendar year 2003; aad WHE tEAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 ova tht : approved by the Commissim in GUE) No. 9400; and WHE tEAS, the Company's CRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of eostomem it ereby imderco trang the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; end WHE. tE.49, the Company's GRIP request fails to t:OOenize that OUD No. 9400 rams included prof t based on TXU Corpomuctils capital mcmre rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s cuacat Capita and WHE LEAS, the mfonnaton reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implemencid m of the Company's ('SUP request would Milli in further over-esmiug by the Company aht ve that approved by the Commission in CUD No. 9400; and 'FM :EAS, in consideration of the city taxing action before August 12, 2005, on the ctmmdy per fine GRIP mquesS the Company has a=!geed not to filo any additional GRIP requests befo. a September 15, 2005. NOW THEREFOM, BE IT ORDAIISED BY 1HE CITY COUNCIL OF TIM MY OF DENL40] !, TEXAS: SECT ON 1. That the Company's GRP rate in.^reese request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GR;? & = ate an,' is :herefore denied in all respects. The defeps m. the request include, but arc Clot liuitnd ter, the fotlowin� (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rte base; (b) the Company inebtded is is ealcula$on projDcts unrelated to system impn vement; (c) the Company failed to =oguize the ineroased revenues it is uow receiving nuc to increased tares approved by the Commission in GUD No- 9400 and due to customer gro nh; A infumation supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its iertustumer investment in bas'` asuucnae in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the Company's i TRIP request would remit in cver-ezming by the Company in the year of implamiamafi, it, and M the Company has failed to demonstrate that it moats the statutory prerequisites o qualify for a GRIP ria increase. or that Cts proposed method of implementation oftbe GRIF same consimacs a contortional application of the statute. SECT ON 2. That the City- is authorized to wcpaefe with other Cities within the Company's I istribution System that mve formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, Legotiate with the Company, make rerommendahoas to the City regarding reasonable M s and to direct nay nereasary &tigatioa associamd wish an aopcal of :his ordinance • tothe Commi;slon. ' 166aU2�Otainv x .. JUL-20-2005 03:14PM F0.K: ID: SF�-RMnN PRtE:003 R=100x JUL-21-2005 09:33 FRDI:SHERMgM1 191132914249 70:912142062120 P.10 JUL-20-0a 16:09 PRAM. iD. PAGE SECT ;ON 3. That -je costs IDeurred by ACSC in revie•,virg the Company's GRIP ropea and r =presenting ACSC m this proceeding ere bereby found N be reasonable and, upon submission to the Compsay, shall be promptly reimbrused by the Company. SECT ON 4. That the City is authorized to tate Pre in any appeal Of the city's action fled at the C, mamsaon, and to pazticpexe it. any such appal as a member of ACSC. SECT :ON S. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and aft its passage, as tit a law and charter in sn6 casts provide. SECT :ON 6. That it is hereby officially found and detanomed that the meeting at wbich this Ordizaino a is passed is open to the pubic as required by law and that public notice of the timy place in d purpose of said mocting was given as required. SECT ON 7. That a copy of this ordrtiae.-e, constituting fiml action on the Cornpaay's application, E tall be forwarded to the appropriate 0mmated revres�rtative of the Company within 10 da, s as follows: Richard Rew, .' LMI—gec, Ga_c Regulation, Atrnos Eaere„y Corp., Md - Tex Division. Lincoln Center II, 186 Flocr, 5420 LLJ Free•% ay, DaP.as, Texas, 75240. DUL`. PASSED and approvedby he City Council of the Cityof Derisory Texts, oa this the I e day. f July, 2005. AND TT IS E 3 ORDERED. �s On motion b} Camcilman hlooaly, seton:jed S,: Councibnom Williams, the above and foregoing �1 ord:umccwa passim and apprxed on Chis toe 18" day o£l� aly, 2005, bythe following vote: Ayes: 1Jrffiaimous Nays: Abste :tions: At regular am ing Jnry lis, 2009. ATTEST: �C Nma`funes, C. edt APPROVED: Tom Akins, C ity Attorney l669\IZ0r&= x 3 JUL-20-20W 03: 14PM FRH: 73ILE LIDID OR 4/4 10: SFCpr +4• PA;W-: W4 R=100% • JUL-26-2005 TUE 10:53 AM ATMOS ENERGY 07/25/2995 64:13 9722385793 FAX NO. 8173032929 P. 02 CITY OFFICE PAGE 92 ORDINANCE NO. '1838-05 ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DESOTO, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID TEX DMSION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABIUTY RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS CTURE ARPARRT OFGTHE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP, MID•TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND LITIGATION A HORVJNGTHE PINTERVENTIANY AND ONEAS FAART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX OMSION. • WHEREAS, on of stout Decemhar 17, 2004, Atmos Energy C-0ry„ Mid -Tex Division, (the 'Company') filed with the City of DeSoto (`Cllyl, a request parauarn to Terga UtitNes Code § 104.301 for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase For cuutomers on the Companys statawlde gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date rmt8 March 4, 2005, for some uities on Its system; and WHEREAS, the City has m duaNe original Jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution faCSides located Within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(b) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely aded to suspend Bre effective date of Atmos' proposed fate Increase; and WHEREAS, 813 reasonable for the City of DeSoto to cooperate with other cites in a coalition of cities In opposldon to the Company's Sling at the Railroad Commission ('ACSC'�n anCoalition being y Ppm ofdie Cites'actions to the Oommisaion; andteedn9 Committee WHEREAS, the Gee Utility Regulatory Ad grants local regulatory authorities the right to Intervene In rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that cowls incurred by the City in ratemaMng adMOes arc to be reimbursed by the regulated utnity; and Page i of 3 cb a o-iseu amwim tb. , B]B W • JUL-28-2005 TUE 1053 AN ATMOS ENERGY FAX NO, 8173032929 P. 03 -- — — — ---7 .' — CIN M04WFaa OFFICE PAGE 03 87/45/4885 84:13 972230,5793 • ORDINANCE NO. 1539-05 WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred In this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company; and WHEREAS, oounsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's ANng and upon consultation with various oensultants, recommends fouling that the Company's Proposal Is unjustiOed, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104.301) shher In fact or m law; and WHEREAS, infomretion moMed by the Company in response to ACECs requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased parwstomer Investment In Infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has pubfidy stated that it will receive substantial profit In 2005 over that approved by the Commission in CUD No. 94W; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request falls to aocoiurd for grovdh in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate Incrasae; and WHEREAS, the Companys GRIP request fats to recognize that GUD No. 9490 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital stirs rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current =pbl structure, which justifies a lower rate of return; and WHEREAS, the Mrmalian reviewed by the ACSC consultants Indloates that Implementation of the Companys GRIP request Would result In further over-earning by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, In consideration of he city taking action befons August 12.2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to foe any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT ORDAINED DY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DESOTO, TEXAS! §,ACTION 7. That the Company's GRIP raw increase request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied In all respects. The defects in the request Include, but arc not limited to, the following: (0) the Company Improperly calculated re 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included In He calculation pm)eots unrelated to system Improvement; (c) the Company felled to recognize the imumesed revenues H is now recehdng due to InCressed rates approved by the Commission In GUO No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) Information supplied by the Comparry In(Ilcawd that the Company sotually dacroased As per- customer Investment In infrastructure In calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the Company's GRIP request would result In over-aaming by the Company in the year oI Implementation; and (f) the Company has failed w demonstrate that it meats the statutory prerequisites to quallfy for a 43MP rate increase or that Its proposed method of Implementation of the GRIP statute constitutae a constitutional application of tha statute. Page 2 of 3 • • JUL-26-2005 111E 10:53 AN ATMOS ENERGY 87/25/2005 84:13 9722305793 FAX N0, 8173032929 P. 04 CITv MANhrFW OFFICE PAGE e4 ORDINANCE N0. 105-05 SErTION 2. That the City Is authorized to mOPerate with other Was within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSO 10 hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. §ECTION 3. That the Costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the ComPanys GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submieaton to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorind to intervene In any appeal of the citys action filed at the Commission, and to particlpats In any such appeal as a member of ACSC. &C20N5. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and atter Its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide, SECTLPH 6. That It Is hereby MPclasy found 9M determined that the meeting at whith this Ordinance Is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpdee of said meeting was gHen a t required. SECTION T. That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company whhin 10 days as follows: Richard Rale, Manager, Gas Reguistlon, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tax Division, Uncoin Center Ii, le Floor, 5420 LRJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240. DULY PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DESOTO, TEXAS, ON THIS THE 19m DAY OF JULY, 2003. ATTEST: A/F /�1J Anel) Shipman, GNy tfecrelary APPROVED AS TO FORM; Peter try Aaamsy APPROVED: 4MIW26� Page 3 or 3 cny�o.ewoa,rd w.,cwm • 0 ORDINANCE NO. 1934 DENYING ATMOS'GRI'REQUEST AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DMSION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HER LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS • ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DMSION. WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, (the "Company'? filed with the City of Duncanville ("City"), a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104.301 for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until Much 4, 2005, for some cities on its system; and • WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(b) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed rate increase; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Duncanville to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ("Commission's, said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC"), in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and _ WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and 1668\12\Ordinance WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company; and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law; and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased per -customer investment in infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and • WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that OLD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, which justifies a lower rate of return; and WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further over -earning by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the city taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its per -customer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the • Company's GRIP request would result in over -earning by the Company in the year of 1668\12\Ordinance • implementation, and (f) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. SECTION 2. That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. SECTION 3. That the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the city's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. SECTION 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the • time, place and purpose of said mating was given as required. SECTION 7. That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp, Mid - Tex Division, Lincoln Center 11, 186 Floor, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240. DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council of the City of Duncanville, Texas, on this the 19th day of July, 2005. APPROVED AS TO FORM: • City Attorney 1668\12\0rdinance ORDINANCE 05-07-09 DENYING ATMOS' GRIP REQUEST AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ENNIS, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS • ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION. WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, (the "Company") filed with the City of Ennis, Texas ("City'), a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104.301 for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system; and • WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(b) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed rate increase; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Ennis to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ("Commission"), said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ('ACSC'), in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and 1668\12\0rdinance • WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company; and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law; and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased per -customer investment in infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and • WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, which justifies a lower rate of return; and WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further over -earning by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the city taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COlv11v1ISSION OF THE CITY OF ENNIS, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request include, bin are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its per -customer investment in infiastmeture in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the • Company's GRIP request would result in ova -earning by the Company in the year of 1668\12\Ordinance • implementation; and (f) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. SECTION 2. That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. SECTION 3. That the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the city's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. SECTION 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the • time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. SECTION 7. That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid - Tex Division, Lincoln Center II, 18th Floor, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240. DULY PASSED and approved by the City Commission of the City of Ennis, Texas, on this the 18" day of July, 2005. APP D: RU SELL R. THOMAS Mayor ATTEST: APP $NEE,D O FORM: �� is 1. City AtUftney 1668\12\0rdinance • CITY OF FARMERSVILLE ORDINANCE #2005-32 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FARMERSVILLE TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION. WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex • Division, (the "Company") filed with the City of Farmersville ("City"), a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104.301 for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system ; and WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(b) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed rate increase; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Farmersville to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ("Commission"), said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC"), in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rete proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by • the City in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and Ordinance #2005-32 Page I of 3 • WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company; and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law; and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased per -customer investment in infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, which justifies a lower rete of return; and • WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further over-eaming by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the city taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMERSVILLE TEXAS: ' SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request Is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in ail respects. The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its per - customer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the Company's GRIP request would result in over -earning by the Company in the year of implementation; and (f) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the ® statutory prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. Ordinance #2005-32 Page 2 of 3 • SECTION 2. That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. SECTION 3. That the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the city's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. SECTION 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. SECTION 7. That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the • Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, Lincoln Center ll, 18' Floor, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240. DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council of the City of Farmersville Texas, on this the 12th day of July, 2005. • ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Ordinance 92005-32 Page 3 of 3 ORDINANCE NO. 1095-7-2005 • DENYING ATMOS ENERGY GRIP REQUEST AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GAINESVILLE, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIR LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CrTY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; PROVIDING FOR SUSPENSION OF THE CHARTER REQUIREMENT OF READING THE ORDINANCE ON THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS • ENERGY CORP., AHD-TEX DIVISION. WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp, Mid -Tex Division, (the "Company) filed with the City of Gainesville ("City'), a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104.301 for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until Much 4, 2005, for some cities on its system; and C, J WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(b) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed rate increase; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Gainesville to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ("Commission % said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC'D, in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and Ordinance No. 1095-7-2005 Denying 2003 GRIP incense to Atmos Energy • WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratemaidng activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company, and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law; and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased per -customer investment in infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and • WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, which justifies a lower rate of return; and • WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further over -earning by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the city taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to Me any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. - NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GAINESVILLE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP tate increase request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its per -customer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the Ordioenoe No. 1095-7-2005 Denying 2003 GRIP increase to Amros Energy • Company's GRIP request would result in over -earning by the Company in the year of implementation, and (f) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. SECTION 2. That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. SECTION 3. That the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the city's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. SECTION 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the • time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. SECTION 7. The City Council of the City of Gainesville, Texas hereby finds that the present ordinances and regulations of the City are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Gainesville, Texas, and that it is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety, and general welfare of the public to suspend the Charter requirements of reading this Ordinance on three separate days. • SECTION 8. That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid - Tex Division, Lincoln Center IL 18' Floor, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240. Ordinance No. 1095-7-2005 Denying 2003 GRIP increase to Atmos Energy • CHARTER SUSPENSION IN REGULAR SESSION OF THE CITY OF GAINESVILLE, TEXAS ON THE 19� DAY OF JULY 2005, THE CHARTER PROVISION OF THE CITY OF GAINESVILLE REQUIRING THE READING OF THE ORDINANCE ON THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS WAS SUSPENDED BY A VOTE OF: • • -.L-AYES, 0 NAYS, 1 ABSENT, 0 ABSTENTIONS. -4ENNLOCHMAYOR ATTE T: (ilfi�Z®7�/ KAY VJNNON, CITY SECRETARY ADOPTION ADOPTED IN REGULAR SESSION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GAINESVILLE, TEXAS ON THE 19� DAY OF JULY 2005, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: --6--AYES, 0 NAYS, 1 ABSENT�O ABSTENTIONS. ATTEST: lti KAY XUNNON, CITY SECRETARY Ordmence No. 1095-7-2005 Denying 2003 GRIP increase ro Atmos Energy aut.—Gl—zuub IHU t, nt ra a a'o UEF Y v9h; N0. 0173932929 P. 02/04 • OI:DhNANCENO. 7234 AN OTQ7INAN+:E •_M TZLI <:IT4' :5' GFLANDFIt 4`RIE, TEXAS, e f4,^ A": d'':"' P*7iRGY '_' IS, MID=PEX DE`1}'1'NG' THF. }tzt�1:.;{;C DIVISIU: , FOR AN Ap Nj; +::ASI :::�.`.'+.Ittr.ITY I •` Rb3 STRUCTURL'' PROD''.=:,:R9 (GkIP) PATE [Y_RERI'ii::iC .1:B MU^;CIPALTTYt AS A PART OF '7HCs COMP.',, Y"S bT .. TEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION 55'STMt .aPPI;i:':.;iG COOPEiu''TiiON WITS OTHEp, Ct'ITES VMHTN THE A7—fi3 EI�.ERGY CORP., MID-'CEX DIVIIICN Yt.S'i F.IBtJT ttiN SYSjTAj .':2 F'A:f T OF THY, ATMOS CITIES S'C£Etdf 'X CC,:ti10i'MI: (A^SC)- �t:'F":Tf)7tlMG A,%b'C TO HIRE LFGAI. AND r'ONSUVTINI'. 3ERVfi'F.` :SND TO rV'3 WIATE WITH THE '_()MPA:9Y AND DU? CT N�CESS�A!.LITIGATION; AL'TliriRI ZINE; IrrTEIt'+E?"f!.frNp F.!:T.tTF KANY APPEAL, OF TtiF. CITY,S A�'I'itlt: TO -.t4L i:!J1,ROAC t:OMMISSION; APPF!}'%IiiG COS'P3 iNCirRI:.;iD 'J 1i I'.54•;;i'ABLI: .t`B PROVIDING A ;2EO1"Lr•L£NIE�."C F::?R FPOMY (RSEit1':NT OF COSTS; PINDi1It; T FIAT 711f,MULNG a,'r Y IIiCH TL -`w DRD'N'ANCE IS OT ! TO THE TUSK A x,c t. T., t IR.Cli r1Y LAW; P.ND P➢iQV'irlYY?G i'ilf. `!t:'I iCI. OF '-RL'i iIRDINAN".: TO ATMOS WHERF,\% c, abnat D-,emtrx ; -, 2004, !^'=S t:'Kr3y Co -p.. Mid -Tex Division, (the "Company": 5'.'d •nth We City c> Gana PM.''. . t"City• j, :request pursmattt to 7exaa Utilities Crile ln: 30: f!' t c -IP ra: y: ORI: 11:y r•;-:: cmn.'ture 'No -am (ORIP)rate increase to tc :N:dive Fen'uary 15, 2005, for custor e. t :: tti.: C.: m;:onv ; ?w. t.i' ^ 1'twt •r� a gash:! ;'°dem 20G5.:r,r !n.'tie nudes on its systan : and subsrnos i:':::� t°n.: :1Y"rrti .-ate and WHEREAS, =. e City hL1,.*d ui,- e :rig aal jil—A ' no :;: ewlu.,- <;e Compara%s rzcaee[ as it pertains ;, :I:� 'Ii-uibw�:.r [csi-� :, I:. and F-' �'�' .:;�- t_y, pu''rra.". `� Texas 'Jiiiaias Code §§107.0"b.h'vd;IV i.qt ad WHERR.=>. :- t7ity un:ty vrcc .: auwpc '..t= e'twtive de':^. ;f Atmos' proposed rate increase:; - 1 WHER}Ats.. c b ree:. Ig %e For G^. C. of ii..r:` ?m.itfe to vrith cthor cities in a coaliti0n �f •. `. `..'Y in i!C:SS':0:, b the I: ••.Y:'.F,:"a IRI'S '+ +'- RRlIrOSd Commlwin ("Corrmi::ti _ aid aab::a." b^ g .n>tn s .:.:tries Stem G Commiuee (ACSC"), in any appt. i' r.•"tie r ties ar:icns tc the'. ennui- Mi W"rt : '>w _ `. t� R^-.vL::-:r Act : .. �. :ct1 r&F, z -k f authorities tL right [A 111(erycna ll'r.'Lr•]:Cc^-i•i't E -w': Ct'-'._ WhLs':.'.:P.'.'. imion; Wa 0 - JUL-21-2005 TN 01:.;,l .'li ATtOS .hm Gt 7,;X PA 8!"3032929 P. 03/04 • (,.F:OINANC'E NO. 7234 ir.r-vsa :equei is found to be unjustified, WHEREAS, the -1 wr as Utilities +:a' -e t; 103.02": nr i "s.:;: ';hat cm., icc=ed by the City in -.",:r ::f:t.. " Tate.re's:,t mtemakm& activikes ax to be -r, ,r.St, sr.i r I the r ;r�sr ,i ;n'iity, ar.1 defects in :ho --:;n.-, ic•J i,10w -rc i. unit::" : he ;)DO—ding e 1 the Company improperly WHEREAS, _"_'C: s wt cree e)vs:s:rCmr?J �u J�*'s;roceedin u: reasoaabL• and should : rete bn e, ;b tit C:,'.r,psn:. be reimbuse! by he Coln^;n -, and system imprc••rrert; l.) J'r, COrvoan; faller WHEREAS. c,;.n3cl fir e t:4C, ao)a -t.-sew of -^ %esmany's'`icog and upon consultation reeei¢lnp rue iis With various const r—its recG]:17G--d3 'rding Leat ;he _ompany'. ?roposal is unjustified, J3atCn i1 ?'IT' No. 9400 and due to unreasonable e d s :0: Sa o:a,planre v :6 the '{T Ett...ue (Texum Utilities Code § 104301) :$--cc E4 c:;af by bi: that in far: or i-, Is, ; aa" decrew-e—ts i:.4 WHEREAS, iakirc':ar; cr;,:dad b,+ tI:'e Cc n -c ap in rnpore tr. ACSC's requests for r, t it. solani r i= 2003; (a) approval of the Information a',di: nes t.,: the (:.valmr'; ed:>'!1 .'ecrtased percasiomer invasiment in t co,:as; Vi"O I : en.: in infnistructwe !•a:ag ra;a''.ia: era:2 03; an.: implama:..}i!, r: :::. WHEREAS. 0x Ccmpa-y aus p•kLCly :atxl t::. i •t.'-�ceive s,t}acniel profit in 3005 over _exuast' tin: it maeu me statutory that appmvtJ b,, :^e iu,-Ui., Vo. 9'_.);>„1 WHEREA , 0:e C'cinparry': CR'P mue,t fail. n W ^;u c _or grmklly is numbers of customers, thereby andira thr ra;'rr•u _.,, •;11 .ece;v,. ,':•r fupropoeed r.:%iP rniE increase, and WItEREAS, c.. C.r n!ia'y": 3RIP requer fail a. r .%lil ize that G' iii No. 9400 rates included • profit bases :r..'{Cr •^c,I✓,ratin :'s aspihu stn:; r.s:::cr'i..r than .;'r .c. Energy Cap.'s current Capital at.L;tU-: w$1, Iie3El:]nl':':'te ofr•'A`i _I WHEREAS, WHEREAS. t' r ; t rtr tin:t r"Vie•,vetl :y the .=.r'i+: C,au.'tants'•r':wtee that implementation of the Cwpen)'a 0f3P:er4s, ,,:)cid suit in .'::rti.r c:'-r<amin4 k;� the Comoany above that approved':: r' . 'C n:r 3i. .?d WHERE.t 4. :;n _:;lo•iacr: c+'•'x -,N mldin,, a _ ', L; fore Aug'i,t l2, 2005, nn the cuncritly pending CPUP r, Vesi, i. r !: twt-;y his ^_gree.' c' :; .; m any ad. :.i• nal GRIP regs:sts before . septembe-' S, :.'•05. NOW, Mirll�"P*O ; C, 3L IT 0111IM v ED P'; T,41, '"ITY CG; NCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND P&M,1'^:, TY ,, X SECTION 1 i tai 'Ire C:r_van; Is :ia,P raiz: ir.r-vsa :equei is found to be unjustified, utvess0m'.E!e .t•.' -.",:r ::f:t.. " Tate.re's:,t is therefo. a S_ried in aL respects. The defects in :ho --:;n.-, ic•J i,10w -rc i. unit::" : he ;)DO—ding e 1 the Company improperly calcula-ad hs ^ ., : rete bn e, ;b tit C:,'.r,psn:. ", `..' c•:' in its O;.L. ii.9on projects unrelated to system imprc••rrert; l.) J'r, COrvoan; faller si the i:nn aced revenues it is now reeei¢lnp rue iis twra O iSteq?.;ip -c by . 4 :'..�'J J3atCn i1 ?'IT' No. 9400 and due to :$--cc E4 c:;af by bi: i.ptly indku,-J .hat the Company actually decrew-e—ts i:.4 u,ntner mvai-mtr.:;,. infms:.-.. r, t it. solani r i= 2003; (a) approval of the Company : t?;' J, t co,:as; Vi"O I : en.: in i :, : i ng by a.., . Company in the year of implama:..}i!, r: :::. I bu ,C•..rs:i ''as `•: .'.i _exuast' tin: it maeu me statutory 0 JUL-21-2UUb IiiU Ul .d "i Ki 11Q, tKkiif., F:; N0. 131;3(:3"2929 P. 04/04 r)ltDWANCE NO. 7234 • ,.' od of im=te!uantation prerequisite, to q:::.l f Tor : I'.1t =en !_Tease".:' oftae GRlF scar.::'..r.r:sd aa:acons:tc:i:aal ap;>...,": •n:tiha sta?• �. SECTION ? 71.+'• C:�' s nuL`.or'i,.'. r; cool*•-.tc-•"n'I+ other canes within the Company's Distribution Sy= zm that Lair forme'. s C to I; nd diet[ leg'a: tooareasonable el and le rates ssand ',:axeraa:vmamdst:••:s+: '• Cityre6sdwgreasonable:aresend negotiate with *3t*c?t:r, ' bis orri to diract an; nese : .ir SaCon aso; axx' %rith a , ai,n•>-: "I ,ra ce to 162 Commission. SECTION 3 71:: In' c'.•=:= 1''.1-20 ty .'-,CSC 4 to::r.,o .ng the Ce+:,.srY's GRP request and rep;it ".:^i;j.:•i cedi,_�e.cie'-+=•lessors?ae znd, upon submission to the Company, sr.:,:' -e pr my rl•, xhnnbu s,d by d-,..::�•,'.ye': !. SECTION 7t i; the C:, n: is sud;rit:: to in:e -...- e,• ,pp, ::if:he city'a action Bled at av3*ychn. atrem6eraf P::'SC. the Cemrris^'.cn s._":f<r'n' .: •:e imm71, �, <.lv L= aad after its SECTIOkS. 7= ]';a ;,rairaz:cx si:��' Deet;: :.._. SECTIO"' 6. "t:•�: is is i cr,by o ti:sil, faun9 r:�::: -tined rifer ' :e meeting at which this Ordinance s p't. sxis cot tF.e tm`I a as ma: 'e: ate; and pt -i gublic notice Of the time, placeasJ n--Pu:•-cr.Iain ox_ura w; s p':en asi ,:o.i t�e company's • : SECTION , '... r y ;f tlt u.an o taylg fma a'. tetive of the C'ampany application :ha: i to ,... t zd . tit p;:roP 3 4nated r i within 1: os Energy Corp., Mid - t[ : r Tea Dins' .n_r •a Ceu:cr _ .&" Floc-. W , ..: PASSES) 0":t%R:'t/I:k? 13Y '111F, CIT1 010 f -CIL O.F T'i:E CM w GRAND PRAIRIE, T:.'"•E ..:hi!i "1ii';?7air Jlrn ATTEST! �+ �•] {fes,, i -'�rin r' !Y.F r-�'` . 4 �l'Y F�::lam�^^ \ �; , ' r: • � :1' City �edl"11'J .. APPRfl`t"ED City Ah: ii,. 0 Jul -10-2005 03:000 Frw-ATNOS ENERGY F -IL 11 2.4 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BELL 12540627400 T-550 P.0041006 F-81 ORDINANCE NO. 2005-19 CITY OF HARKER HEIGHTS AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY O HARKER HEIGHTS, EXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP, MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT RF -IMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP„ MID-TEX DIVISION. WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, (the "Company") filed with the City of Harker Heights ("City'), a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104.301 for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system m be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective dare until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system ; and WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction m evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(b) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed rate increase; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Harker Heights to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ('Commission'), said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Committee C'ACSC'j, in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and sols-ese-"2 s149TaH aa%JeH do RZTO dLS:Zo 50 S1 Inr Jul-18-3005 03:06Pm From-AMS ENERGY 12548627400 T-559 P.005/006 F-875 ®� WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and WHEREAS, ACSC's rete ease expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company; and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law; and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased per-customer investment in infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company bas publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 Over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and �' WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates • included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, which justifies a lower rate of return; and WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further over-eaming by the Company above that approved by the Commission in OUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in consideration ofthe city taking action before August 12, 2005, an the currently pending GRIP request, the Company bas agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Barker Heights, Texas: Section 1. That the Company's GM rate increase request is found to be unjustified, unrcesoaablc and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (e) the Company ftihed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company �. actually decreased its per-customer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) • 6-d S09S-696-69Z sg4BraH Jaxj, H 30 Rglo dBS:au so ST Inr Jul -16-2005 03: Up Fraa-ATaOS ENERGY 12546627400 T-550 P.006/006 F-675 • I'd 9099-egs-*92 sl0taH JaNJ2H jn RltO d9gi00 SO St Tyr approval of the Company's GRIP request would result in over-eaming by the Company in the • year of implementation; and (f) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP stature constitutes a constimtienai application of the statute. Section 2. That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. Section 3. That the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding me hereby found to be reasonable ad, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. Sectiou 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the city's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. Section 5. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. Section 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public. as required by law and that public notice of the �"- time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. • Section 7. That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid - Tex Division, Lincoln Center 11, 18n Floor, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240. DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council of the City of Harker Heights, Texas, on this the 12" day of July, 2005. APPROVED: Ed NuIrd—Z en� mayor ATT£ T: Patric a Bormson, City Secretary APPRO AST : • I'd 9099-egs-*92 sl0taH JaNJ2H jn RltO d9gi00 SO St Tyr • Janes Johnson 8175775497 P.5 CITY OF HASLET ORDINANCE NO. 0703-85 ORDINANCE DENYING ATMOS' GRIP REQUEST AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HASLET, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM;- APPROVING YSTEM;APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HER LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION, AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUBED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS • ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MHLTEX DIVISION. WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, (the "Company') filed with the City of Haslet ("City"), a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104.301 for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system; and WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(6) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed rate increase; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Haslet to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ("Commission"), said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC"), in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Cas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission, and Ord. No. 0703-05 1 07/11705 CI James Johnson 8175775497 p.6 WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated milky, and WHEREAS. ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company, and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 105.301) either in fact or in law; and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased per-auamner investment in infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercoundr% the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognim that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, which justifies a lower rate of return; and WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further aver -earning by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the city taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company hes agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HASLET, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request includq but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its per -customer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the Ord. No. 0703-05 2 07/11/05 James Johnson 8175775497 p.7 GCompany's GRIP request would result in over -earning by the Company in the year of implementation; and (f) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the stable. SECTION 2 That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendation to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. SECTION 3_ That the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding aro hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the city's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. SECTION 6. Thai it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. isSECTION 7. That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp, Ngd- Tac Division, Lincoln Center IL I e Floor, 5420 LBI Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 752'4/0. DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council of the City of 144.fc6T Texas, on this the " day of ,71st Y , 2005. APPROVED: !rf ! Gary [uis , Mayor ATTEST: Diane Raasso` rCity Secretary Ord. No. 0703-05 3 07;1110 5 0 • CITY OF HEATH, TEXAS ORDINANCE 050707 DENYING ATMOS' GRD' REQUEST AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HEATH, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIR E LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS . ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION. WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, (the "Company") filed with the City of Heath ("City'), a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104.301 for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system; and • WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(6) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed rate increase; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Heath to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ("Commission"), said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC"), in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and 1668\12\0rth cc • WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company; and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law, and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased per -customer investment in infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and • WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, which justifies a lower rate of return; and WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further over -earning by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the city taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEATH, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its per -customer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the • Company's GRIP request would result in over -earning by the Company in the year of 1668\12\Ordinance implementation; and (f) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. SECTION 2. That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. SECTION 3. That the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the city's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. SECTION 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the • time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. SECTION 7. That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid - Tex Division, Lincoln Center II, 18" Floor, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240. I�L DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council of the City of Heath, Texas, on this the day of July 2005. APPROVED AS TO FORM: 1668\12\0rdinance ATTEST: Pete Eckert, City Attorney 0 ORDINANCE 071105C ORDINANCE DENYING ATMOS' GRIP REQUEST -- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HONEY GROVE, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DMSION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND • PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION. WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, (the "Companyl filed with the City of Honey Grove ("CityD, a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104.301 for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system ; and WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within Ahe City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(b) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed rate increase; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Honey Grove to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ("Commission" ), said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC"), in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to • intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and 1668\12\Ordinance 0 WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility, and WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company; and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law; and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased per -customer investment in infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and • WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, which justifies a lower rate of return; and WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further over -earning by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUT) No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the city taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HONEY GROVE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvemmt; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually • decreased its per -customer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the Company's GRIP request would result in over -earning by the Company in the year of 1668\12\0rdu=ce 0 implementation; and (f) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. SECTION 2. That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. SECTION 3. That the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the city's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, w the law and charter in such cases provide. SECTION 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which • this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. • SECTION 7. That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid - Tex Division, Lincoln Center II, 1816 Floor, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240. DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council of the City of Honey Grove, Texas, on this the _ j j k6 day ofl u , 2005. �� APPROVED: Fred Siebeathe 1, Mayor TTEST: AjOarner, C4 Secretary 1668\I2\0rdiaeace Janes Johnson 9175775497 p-2 • ORDINANCENO. D5--18 ORDINANCE DENYING ATMOS' GRIP REQUEST AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF KRUK TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABD.ITY LVFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF T13E CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION. WHEREAS,on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tac Division, • (the "Company") filed with the City of Krum ("City'), a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104.301 for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system; and WHEREAS, the City bas exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains m the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant m Texas Utilities Code § § 102.001(b) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed rate increase and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Krum to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commissim ("Commission"), said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC'j in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Unlity Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right m intervene in rum proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and WHEREAS, ACSC's rete case expenses incurred in this proceeding arc reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company; and James Johnson 8175775437 p.3 ORDINANCE NO. page 2 • WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Campany's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Teiras Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law; and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for infmmetion indicates that the Company actually decreased per-customu investrnmt in infmstrucmre during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company bas publicly slated drat it will receive substantial profit in 2005 ova that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it win receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s etrrent capital structure, which justifies a Iowa rate of raum; and WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further over -earning by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and W-HERFAS, in consideration of the city taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September I5, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KRUK TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects, The defects in the request include, bre are not limited to. the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its pa-cngmma investment in infrastructure in ealadar year 2003; (e) approval of the Company's GRIP request would result in ova -earning by the Company in the year of implementation; and (i) the Company has failed to demomtrate that it meets the statutory prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implemention of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. SECTION 2. That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have forested ACSC to him and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recormmendatiom to the City regarding 0 James Johnson 8175775497 p.4 ORDINANCE NO. • • C1 Page 3 reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. SECTION 3. That the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the city's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. c.ti•.C17ror c-�+..,ew:o n.,t��tau...-- -"'--`---'.�...,:_._�_�__... __..a,. u. • ORDINANCE #797 DENYING ATMOS' GRIP REQUEST AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE WORTH, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION. • WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004,Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, (the "Company") filed with the City of Lake Worth ("City"), a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104.301 for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system; and WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(6) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed rate increase; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Lake Worth to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ("Commission"), said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC"), in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City • in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and L%CfyS ad.,WeiomoeVllTlGa GRD DOMM 2007 GRIP.a P e1.0 • WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company; and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law; and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased per -customer investment in infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and -- WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s • current capital structure, which justifies a lower rate of return; and WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further over -earning by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the city taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE WORTH, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base, (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUI) No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its per -customer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the Company's GRIP request would result in over-eaming by the Company in the year of implementation; and (f) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation • of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. L'Cily Secquyl0 nc 'ATMOS ORD DENYING 2003 GRIP doc Pee 2 of3 • SECTION 2. That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hive and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. SECTION 3. That the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the city's action - filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. SECTION 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. SECTION 7. That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company • within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid - Tex Division, 300 S. St. Paul Street, Suite 8-113 EC, Dallas, Texas, 75201. DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council of the City of Lake Worth, Texas, on this the 12'a day of July, 2005. APPROVED: (N Gl.C7� Wetter Bowen, Mayor ATTE T: '1I& 44 Linda Rhodes, TRMC City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: • City Attorney L:Kiry aea �OrOwnceWTAl03 ORD DIN: WG 2003 GWPA. Pn, 3.0 0 ORDINANCE NO. 3218-07-2005 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LEWISVILLE, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIR LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW, AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS • ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, (the "Company's filed with the City of Lewisville ("City"), a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104.301 for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system; and WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(6) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed rate increase; and 0 • ORDINANCE NO. 3218-07-2005 Page 2 WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Lewisville to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ("Commission'), said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Committee C ACSC'I, in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expanses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and • should be reimbursed by the Company; and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law; and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased per -customer investment in infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and 0 • ORDINANCE NO. 3218-07-2005 Page 3 WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, which justifies a lower rate of return; and WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further over -earning by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and GWHEREAS, in consideration of the city taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LEWISVILLE, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth, (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually F-1 L • ORDINANCE NO. 3218-07-2005 Page 4 decreased its per -customer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the Company's GRIP request would result in over-eaming by the Company in the year of implementation; and (fl the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. SECTION 2. That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance • to the Commission. SECTION 3. That the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the city's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. SECTION 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. C, J • ORDINANCE NO. 321s-07-2005 Page SECTION 7. That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid - Tex Division, Lincoln Center D, 1 e Floor, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Taxes, 75240. DULY PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LEWISVILLE, TEXAS, BY A VOTE OF 5 TO a ON THIS THE 11th DAY OF JULY, 2005. • ATTEST: Julie Heinze, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: Ronald J. Ne an, CITY ATTORNEY Cl APPROVED: Gene Carey, MAYOR • TOWN OF LITTLE ELM, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 713 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF LITTLE ELM, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MCD-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THE TOWN, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITIDN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE TOWN'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDINGTHATTHE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION. WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, (the "Company") filed with the Town of Little Elm, Texas ("Town"), a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104.301 for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system; and WHEREAS, the Town bas exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the Town, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(b) and 103.001; and WBEREAS, the Town timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed rate increase; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the Town to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ("Commission's, said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC"), in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the Town in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and Ordinance No. Page I of 3 WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company; and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law, and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased per -customer investment in infiastrucuse during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRD'. request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, whichjustiSes a lower rate of return; and 6 WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further over -earning by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the Town taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company bas agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCH, OF THE TOWN OF LITTLE ELM, TEXAS: Section 1. Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its per -customer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the Company's GRIP request would result in over -earning by the Company in the year of implementation; and (f) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation 4W of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. Ordinmee No. Page 2 of 3 • Section 2. The Town is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed the Atmos Cities Steering Committee CACSC") to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the Town regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this Ordinance to the Commission. Section 3. The costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. Section 4. The Town is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the Town's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. Section 5. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. Section 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. Section 7. That a copy of this Ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's request and application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the • Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, Lincoln Center II, le Floor, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240. PASSED AND APPROVED by the Town Council of the Town of Little Elm, Texas, on �[hTa tae day of July, 2005. SYM Dougleruvey~& 1 rap � ps, Town Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: • _- Ordinance No. Page 3 of 3 11 ORDINANCE DENYING ATMOS GRIP REQUEST AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MALAKOFF, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS CORP. MID-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABHdTY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP.; MID-TEX DIVISION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONBLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT RED40URSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP.; MID- TEX DIVISION. WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, (the" Company'l filed with the City of Malakoff ("City's, a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code§ 104. 301 for an annual gas reliability inGastructure program (GRIP) rate inerease for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently emended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system and WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertaims to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(b) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed raze increase; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Malakoff to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's fiting at the Railroad Commission (" Commission') said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Committee (" ACSC "), in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities Zd WV0£:0I SOOZ VI '1^r : 'ON SNOHd : 40P1d E the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and WHEREAS, the Texas Utility Code § 103.002 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; said WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company ; and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104. 301 ) either in fact or in law ; and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC', requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased pen -customer investment in infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial • profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposal GRIP rate increase; and N WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp's trrrrent capital structure, which justifies a lower rate of return; and WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC cmuultams indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further over -earning by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the city taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED 6Y THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MALAKOFF, TEXAS: Ed W eE:9S SOOZ >t 'Inf : 'ON 3NOld : WMU 0 SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate incseace request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP astute and is there- fore denied in all respects. The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated it's 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (c ) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUM No. 9400 and due to customer growth ; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its per -customer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the Company's GRIP request would result in over -earning by the Company in the year of implementation; and (t) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory perquisites to qualify for a GRIP tate increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the stance. SECTION 2. That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire • and direct legal couaxt and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. • SECTION 3. That the was incurred by RSCS in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ASCS in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the City's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of RSCS. SECTION S. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and chatter in such cases provide. Cd WUT£:GT SOW VT 'Irr : 'ON 3NOHd : bMj r SECTION 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting a which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. SECTION 7- That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the on the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Re -is, Manager, Gas Regulation , Atmos Energy Corp., Mid --Tex Division, 300 S. St. Paul Street, Suite S- 113 EC , Dallas,Texas 75201. is DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council of the City of Malakoff , Testas , on this the 11 day of July , 2005 . s t ` ATTEST - APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY • S Wtl1£:0S 5002 61 'Inr : 'ON 3NOH8 : Wtlu COPY • ORDINANCE NO. 2005 - 35 DENYING ATMOS' GRIP REQUEST AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO MIR LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS. REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS • ENERGY CORP., MID-TEXDIVISION. WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, (the "Company'D filed with the City of Midlothian ("City, a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104.301 for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system ; and • WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(6) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed rate increase; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Midlothian to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ("Commission'), said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC'), in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and 1668\12\0rdinance WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company, and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law; and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased per -customer investment in infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates • included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, which justifies a lower rate of return; and WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further over -earning by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the city taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company bas agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 tate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its per -customer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the • Company's GRIP request would result in over -earning by the Company in the year of 1668\12\0rdinaace • implementation; and (i) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. SECTION 2. That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to him and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. SECTION 3. That the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the city's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. SECTION & That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as. required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. • SECTION 7. That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid - Tex Division, Lincoln Center 11, 18'a Floor, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240. • DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council of the City of Midlothian, Texas, on this the 12 day of July, 2005. 1e69t12\0ra:_am ,, 1 ATTEST: JUL-25-2005 MON 08:53 AM ATMOS ENERGY FAX NO. 8173032929 P. 02 • ORDINANCE #200504 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF PANTEGO, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID•TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIRATE INCREASE W THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION P) SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH ,OTHERI ON IES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MAY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSQ; AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE. SERVICESLEGAL AND CONSULTING THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL . OF THE TOWN'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED is OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MI)-TEX DIVISION. WHEREAS, on or shout December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy quest Corp., Mid -Tex Ihvwons (the "Company") filed with the Town of Pantago ('TO' ; a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104.301 for an anneal gas reliability in8astntcn¢e gogtam (ORIF) rate m° for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective daze until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system; and WHEREAS, the Town has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the Town, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(b) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the Town timely acted to suspend the effective slate of Atmos' proposed rate increase; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the Town of Pantago to cooperate with other cifies in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ("Commission'), said coalition being knowu as Atmos Cities Steering Commirtee ('ACSC'), in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act giants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the Town go in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and 1668112\0rdineace JUL-25-2005 MON 08:53 AM ATMOS ENERGY FAX NO. 8173032929 P. 03 C, J WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this pmeeeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company; and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing is consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company Proposal unjustified, messonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law; and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests far information indicates that the Company actually decreased per -customer investment in infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby untie wmdng the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporations capital strumae rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, which justifies a lower rate of return; and WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants r indicatesing thathat would t in further the Company above that apparricattention of the roved by the Commissiany's GRIP on in GUD No 9400; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the Town taldng action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, IIF rr ORDAINED PY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PANTEGO, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unjunifi�e unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respec defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its per -customer invesmtent in mfia tuctme in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the Company's GRIP request would result in over -earning by the Company in the year of implementation; and (1) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. G 1666UZOrdiaance JR -25-2005 MON 0853 AM ATMOS ENERGY FAX NO, 8173032929 P. 04 n LJ SECTION 2. That the Town is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the that have formed Am to him and direct legal counsel and Company's Distribution System consultants, negotiate with the Company. make recommendations to the Town regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. 's GRIP SECTION 3. That the costs incurred by ACSCreqreby reviewing and to behmasonable ate+ °P0° vest and representing ACSC in this Proceeding are hall m m'unbutaed by the Company. submission to the Company, promptly of the town's SECTION 4. That the Town is authorized to such a� in a me� of ACSC. action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any PPS SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its page, as the law in such cases Pmvide. SECTION 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the Public as requited by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. SECTION 7. That a copy of this ordinance, eonsdmting final action on the Company's • appfication, shall be forwarded to the aPPmpriete designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Amos Energy Corp" Mid - Tex Division, Lincoln Center 11,1 a Floor, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240. DULY PASSED and approved by the Town Council of the Town of Pantego, Texas, on this the I I" day of July, 2005. APPROVED: 131r01Y Ad It, Mayor ATTEST: --- Tracy B. No*, 1 KMGCMC City Secretary AP ROVED AS T0 is City A W 16691121Ordimace 3 JUL-19-2885 14:56 FROM:9-ERMRN 19036914249 T0:912142062131 P.3'5 JUL 19 2005 2;40PM HP LASERJET 3200 p.2 4 J I_' ORDINANCE NO. 2005-029 AN ORDINANCE OF THE GTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY (F PARIS, PARM TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID -TER DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS REL ABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRA RATE INCREASE IN THE CITY OF PARIS, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEN IDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; .APPROVING COOP;RATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CO: M, MID- TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF TIE: ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING . tCSC TO HERE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO WIMIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LM GATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANF APPEAL OF TRE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COM FISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PR WIDENG A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REWBURSEMENT OI COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIR BY L„W; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION; MAKING OTHER I INDINGS • AND PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE SUBJECT; AND DET:LARING AN EFFECTIVE DATTL WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., I •fid -Tex Division, (the 'Company") filed with the City of Pads (`City"), a request pursuant to T, xas Utilities Code §104.301 $u an camel gas reliability inhsstructureprogram (GRIP) rate incr ase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective Fehraai a 15, 2005, ear subsequesdy extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities C a its system ; atbd, WHEREAS, the City bas exclusive o igival jurisdiction to evahm c the Company's request as it pertains to The disurbution facilities located witbin the City, nusuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(b)and 103.001; and, WHEREAS, Ube City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Ah ms' proposed rete maease; ®d, WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Paris to cooperate will other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition m the Company's filing at the Rail sad Commission ("Commission'), said coalition being know¢ as Atmos Cities Steering Comm: nee ("ACSC"), in any appeal of the citiesactions to the Commission, and, WHEREAS, the Gas Utility ReguLmry Am grams local regulatory ai.thormes the right to im.^rvene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and, 1fi6BV110eneaece 1 JUL-19-2805 02:4WM FAX: I0:SHEFMN PAGE; 02 R-931 JUL-19-2005 19:56 FRDK:SHERM� 19038914299 T0:912142062131 PAs JUL 19 2005 2:40PM HP LHSERJET 3200 p.3 WHEREAS, the Tc 1ltilifies Code § 103.022 provides that costs b corned by the City in ratemaking activities aro ro be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and, WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding uc rtxoonable and should be reimbursed by the Company: and. WIDWAS, namsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company'! filing and upon consultation wish various commAtmits, recommends fording that the Cool my's proposal is unjustified, umreasoaable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (It aas Utilities Code § 104.301) elther it fact min law; and, WHEREAS, information provided by the Compan; in responae to A4'SC's requests for infotzretton indicales that the Company actually decreased per -customs investment in inBastructur during calendar year 2003; and, WHEREAS, the Company bas publicly staled that it will receive st bnwrtial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9700; and, WHEREAS, the Company's GRP request fAs m account for 4o14h In numbers of custamer% therehy undercounting the revenues it will receive from its pr iposd GRIP rare increase; and, WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails ro recog>om dust G1 D No. 9400 rates included profit based an TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atm as Energy Corp.'s currem capital strucurc, which jusd8es a lower rate of return; and WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultn is indicates that imple tematim of the Company's GRIP request wuuld result in further a erearniog by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9100; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the city taking action before Augus 12, 2005, on the currently pending ORIF request, the Company has agreed not to file an) additional GRIP requests befon: September 15, 2005; NOW, MEREIYTRE, BE IT ORDALNED BY THE CM COUNCIL OF THE CITY Ol PARTS, PARIS, TEXAS: Section 1. That the findings art out in the preamble to this orlir me :are hereby in all things approved- Section pproved Section 2. That the Company's GRIP rate Increase request is found m be tmjisdhed, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the rngwm include, but are noL limited to, the following: (a) One Co xgmny improperly ca:culated its 2003 run base; (b) the Company included in its calculation pn jeers uomlamd to system impn7 cot; (c) ncc Company failed to remO. the increased n venues it is now receivmg due to increased nates approved by the Commission in GUD Na 9400 and due to • t66altP.OMawre 2 JUL-13-2805 02:40PM FAX: ID:S-ERt1M PAGE:003 R -93e SUL-19-2805 14:56 FRDM:9fRMRH 19038914249 T0: 912142062131 P.5,5 JUL L9 2005 2:40PH HP LRSERJET 3200 p.4 J .-j msec-- growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its percummer mvestrnort in mfrastructme in to lmiJar year 21303; ;e) approval of the Company's GRIP request would rasuh in ova -caning by the Compan; in the year of imPlemenmdnn; and (1) the Company hes failed to demonstrate that it n eats the statutory prerequisites to qualify, for a GRIP rate immase or that its proposed method of impkmeamthon of the GRIP stanete consulates a constitutional application of the statute, Section 3. That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, mske recommendations to ti c City reprding reasonable rates and to direct any accessary litigation associated with an appy I of this ordinance to the Commission Section 4. Thai the costsincurred by ACSC is miewing the Compe ayy's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be teas maple and, upon submission an the Company, shall be pronpdy reimbursed by the Ccamemy. Section S. Tbal the City is authntizcd to intervene in any appeal of the city' a action filed FA the Conmissioa, and to participate in my such appeal as a number of ACSC Section S. That this Ordinance shall become effoctive immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter as such cases provide. Section 7. That it is hereby officially found and demmined that tht meeting at which this Ordinance is pesscd is open to the public as regttimd by law and that p, blic notice of the time. place and purpose of said meeting was given a required. Section & That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action m the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated rcpreseatativt of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richmd Reis, Nknager, Gas Regulation, Atmos E magy Corp., Kd- Tex Division, Lincoln Center 4 le Floor, 5420 LEl Freeway, Dallas, Texas,' 5240. DULY PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City (f Paris, Texas, on this the 1 Ith day of July, 2005. Curtis Feadicy. NkAe ATTEST: Qt. C7 'ca Ellis, City Clerk R sD AS FORM: La ryySeheold City Attorney IWUZOrd anus JLL-19-2005 02:40PM FAX: ID:SHERMFN PR^E:004 R=93 • • Ja-21-2005 THU 01'5:11 rN :?ThGS ENE4F"1' ci:.< t is 81'2J3AH P. 02 REM : rtiX ori. i_'.:'4?:d-+3 L.'.. 21 2M 12:1487 PS :*'I.DI I;,.'fpj:: Lfsd[ AN artaN�LwCE OF sem. C.rr - £''ZAN RE._, °;"=Ui Dwraao Tse RIi�R'i,4T+3zz Ari�£OS EbttlS4 Cit i' : is".S:FTfiC's.�w2.ei:'iS, i'Cn't. AN AN3v^;3AL GAS Ru `mmay D r2AST3:iC'T:1£ 3 £NCRLASE, IN T.rtIS D. ti:diG`.F'Ai:nW7 AS INT Or 70i C'f.'}'.TAWS ST-41'EW XS GAS UT11W L'it"1Ri8UFTON ^5'117= /j, . .411 s rrNII C ?1 r.P:.:'£C5i Iffm OTHER' 07 ES ITU5W THE 13N ES 1 .S'J rX C0..PT ,d,D=TFtX STEERWO ossm T$E'. (ACS:.'k +''? :rF'+JPS.•" �: y : WS0 -M x:.R's LBOAL A+`m Gw337.r.T; u FERTICES .s_".I': TC" `';t.;r Y7IALi ">TF?;, i>iE 00WANY AND Dwcr A,iiT°>!' 4Tl3mosAR}' .',..i":°,3.ai'i:,'i'e" A!J' O U.MN! ', P..TTERNE 4170N AS PART vs Af-W- LN A'V`t'?�"'P.:._,.. C" ' "-:i'_'.. CrY'S ; _ .Tr -4 T'0 M RAMR04➢ CO2a4"S0A3' :c"3uy6"ZING t. !?tsa.",'.p„3,;.£i ]:°'; E'711 A PROwT RF1tr4F E:=.£':'.T„NT Or COUTS YIaR:i.5-...tui T f 1C:aY CrI i' "'W,.No THAT I:'i8 hwEinkfo CT iGfiT"m 7&Fi4 73ij?Tti gg'CL [ ?A?i;V D M, 1;up TO nm P muc AS R5QL7±CE} £3Y LA's'; AS 1 7WIV e:;::r 0& t&? -W DO TMS ORDNANCE TO 4Tm..wmL"RGYt+ORz., vn'T- .' •"':::;ON. W HERVA F. an 's *vjt 7AsxatN r 3"; ,: `: a: t.IMn E' s'7 i Lqx.: K&Taat DirirBrsa, (113:^•' °fir. -'F a7j Ndai'%*U C..:. ;r a i Pw:n :ir x an um,L! See mUb» £v£:a: k;.'f-= vop=l ': ;':UT'". :,'? ':"tLm'n l.sr mwv != h d7e r-omP!sY's SL. Iew>,v+F-:y: W-3 ''.y lrj ffia N3 �'.!-°;;.nix,:.. 1, n"yz -,..• JrS;e'.i WF7a'W , 811^ of & era:, 0 0 Y"•:,! :+1 tis, M± rs, Q cn1q;mws requm Ls f.. ,:'u"Ye'i'.m to Tht ein -*,i-'S:ic, . ( -L:,l C, ;,r,.i}' U1 T== Ugf uM Cele P5IRe_ N pf 0141711& wmi ;:Spvste vdfh edea y'•:=azru,.uti;n5unn(SH:;:�sL-+•:r•,s:ir::++.:,:':,±=c";M1 Y=•c iN+tgsitheR,road Cr-:sm'ti�±•r. •"�'a>a'>t'als?u+11'11 :uni' :-t'7'�:^, '>�_� ; I^,. :.: Ainna Cities Bsa;vn C=:a.ittaq{`Frrl'".`',. ;;,.:.. :,:as' ..; ti's: dei acd= to',£te Cc7tsui;:d xt �;r1 1123.E.R::, t1•t. a9i.{!£tj+>'t !..FC. ��;� d :4. S.ZtkbfcCW r.t;visany authmitim the tigi:7tta lecrrs�+4 it: e:4 gRx ss,'agF-�:i;d, >: ih: }t r Gxctti 7:11: trss'ezY.an: snc4 C?w._.�:+;ki;..;;x:;,lSw.x•,•-r.r:--.::i.- '4. e..xeci:'e;s:vilitv:em3• A',.;: •_a.e _ .r.2 .u. aa:' a:t y's FBitrg and Ilan am2a4'$.tk-nV: 1& 1,4606s :iF.:'.!`Ya7�; .i','"ti-':i!'£q fImL gz e7lfs xCompmrs • • 0 JUL-21-2005 THU 01:50 ';i r'.T"CO 5d_=3Jr Fk W. 81-1132M P. 03 REM : -0.x �a:. :5725--ZaT: „t. ?I 25 a:isan P2 We r7 EAS, c mm.7 lb attxt'm�.aa L 'r f7fm!a4,uy,6 tF!p Of;g, informa€faca prmide4 hi, er CeMpatty :.-tiff-"s:equea: f s nfoana>tion stratus @tat the :, ,Means actalraCiy d.xv:rraa.='..,;�-erlaa: t iem in":r:st reM•a;re far ca3auiar yea. am%tr.d C'c-meq 3,-lactz'. •. y i..4ied :.*At it will receive sabstoga profitir1.f.13V-tri*uttasproya;tb7!'h,+:.•rarnix onmG;iSItin.9lOC;ani Wkiiiffi?;a� e�:si�nt�uny',ae..�t::''r:•;tr:.:'t*.TsEutaxolLnt-1ct�ymivthutaiam'+,eis of custa'nl rte, tj:&abo teluEl'_..: 1' )'6 "^i': ^. ,tarries h' `-Yrs Tasha s1om IIs ptvgt: Lill' rrtr 3r�.n;ae; :c1:S WFr mkF% t:::• :.oEwanyl. i&:•i't>; lt'a ivfs „ teto;,:pi: t`.at G'UC! :iu. 5400 fat- s:.L'+::x`ei OaroE't twad' ett.:i•KL' C. � .•:cwiionl rapW eAa.-4vm =4% r 2m AhTm A.rie:-d;,* Cvp.'a. c:ar. e:+S :nrt.i afiic i_ses'3cs -a ]oeuer rate of ret.= N04i.Tu.2iva'.tZti<.tiEITtY.•:1S:ji'.:'�:'�.`:7i;ir.iIYa-;i�i'c'S.'JF'li�Q1Y Tact: H=e C.:tu'rzcsp'n r:T:l� ::t« t-C,,tome ;s,;✓:::3t a.^• fouatd tc' be lsafasasorai:.:a ai,:! is it'Ar s:.-r:ext i';1 cP 'alpo:'ia The ao,! ;.=&bkreess a; the raga: t i;ac udu tb ioam ,,% t,y cit. i:'s::;tpsuy afa:r�.mv:.;i Ss invesb=it in i asimfw ;neer IMS, At, t•s-•,n xittwut tW; PA -posed C-%? rate incaa;P: _ Car_tsw,, resew' -s r.36ts :,:•.:.L at r_wass of tb•.ra annvved by the rab.'tAt" feat to aacouil' `.;tl'F:i, �?.'.7'P.3' 'Vl'at4'ii "� s::f t g': bal'S ;3''Sf (I)tha cyapsmy's Qwflung fails to :s :L m- -'iz the rnerksa:[iS' :'r=1f+^race :',::zra; &;4aetr:cx, '� �',at Cotnpzsy L=Eaam.,:ora:w,—,,'.:dtkYJDTk,. JiA.;. "T.'SCiFV u�.'li�:.1:LL3:'�si(1h'L1:.^C4'1t.2A;.1i11tl,. 'y:'ii:.1Y. •aY:it::L.', • AWl 4F Ca.' ^77's 2:Wr'bljiicm.aja. ftn ih t rj v l s. _.:s. ACSC i>'the end direct legal Corm• Uf115' taut?ni.L1:"t3, .'"� n; A'l^{': ani" i 'i '�O'.-•;.j.)aII� $e ke rv':!�7L11t`FbaiaL•.= to tits Cri.y r;:aav,tiit a :'t;a: i•tx: c;, direct ztii: tteazssaty iifgaflon asaactemi mi, aa. arpeal a5 e.:,:.ta u^,it awt and the :tis case Meld at the 8�.:5'iE7$" : �:.s:{.�. t.st.a sryxct! '.,. .;;e. C_i,• >n itir:y.�:,t{a: cine Cornpetep's GA';'t'fnr�est a: li i.�,Frcsryti�v.�;;,,:::...t...'• r,yVi-�;_aarep,.: � . JUL-21-2005 NU'7:::;''u -"AOP TilvP Fpk; Na 21;3032929 P. 04 FROM : FW Mi. _... ._...v ..... 21 2953 12:S6PM P3 J rn C t:lk 4":u'_j ili 8^t':'S J • s. •..; to'11''m tr ,v a pL-4 of file atj's 8Cfn33] .'1:la,-;,? he .1? .i.�.:. �. SEC nO l':. T d- QvAbf. " ;t u;'3 .. dl uti,e imni2 f: ty ham next aha its r�:x;r;, ue {x• iaw' sr:c' �°a:rt:;: s c•) :lir. =.g��;7a+;vide. �fu2'bs"'t T)-ai t. at Lh.x�4g' av» ' r4 Fns deice _rrc L`ut Ito m eeft ;iii IS bbc el> "?:.Y:&ad by law ppd tTha!Prd1a1 uv:sr. �• c# E+e tt: )r_u:;t z .; 'tx¢,..,.:; a of aa,.:i cnee was Sfre as zm;u e1 SHOLIX..m .j .5�•.; Cd ?itii iYC.•1:-,:.. -irvitnft� kid, E tit cm the C:amyax 41;.c Fetix„ 'rx: l:%%- J): M the apr,:epziate deaa<.td "F-mheum r¢ file bits"r i;l dr-.F:l as f..?lc:vs: Richard Rek A•Iaz.jcr.L'sc'?..X!aira:.d>drZK:,Vtua l ^?1., .i�.d-lex:?':,,iaa�.300S.S.laid QfJk%3{:)�:.'k �•,:�31�y r..ff.uai. i�3 4. ..... .. LL'i..f i'A3`x�i% xa ei�rpvcrei vj Ea' °�•� ::::aa=.d1 of sCS.ty of F�a�. Pill, Ten!;f l"h!", t,:?ISO- • 0 T,n'e fn James Johnson 8175775497 p.It • ORDINANCE 05-21 DENYING ATMOS' GRH' REQUEST AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF PONDER, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID -TER DIVISION. WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Md -Tex Division, (the "Company") filed with the Town of ponder ("City's, a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104.301 for an annual gas reliability infiastrw4ure program (GRIP) rate increase for costorner; on dre Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, fnr some cities on its system; and WI -AREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as itpertams to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(b) and 103.001; and WHEREAS. the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Arms' proposed rate increase; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the Town of Ponder to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ("Commission"), said coalition being Imown as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC'), in any appeal of the cities` actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Couunission; and WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratemaldng activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and 1668V210rdinanee 0 James Johnson B175775497 P -1E • WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Compsay, and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Isms Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law, mud WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased per -customer investment in infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substin ial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; mad WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to rewgnim that GUD No. 9400 rates inchrded profit based on T'XU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s orient capital structure, which justifies slower rate of return; and WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in farther over-eaming by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the city taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PONDER, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied m all respects. The defects in the request include, but we not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its per -customer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the Company's GRIP request would result in over-eaming by the Company in the year of implementation; and (i) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory 166MMOrdivanoe 2 is James Johnson 8175775487 P.13 prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. SECTION 2. That the City is authorind to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. SECTION i. That the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proce" we hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submissionto the Company, $tall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is auttmri ed to intervene in any appeal of the city's action fled at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. SECTION 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. SECTION 7. That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's • application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Mager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid - Tex Division, Lincoln Center 11, 18a Floor, 5470 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Terms, 75240. DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council of the Town of Ponder, Texas, on this the jJ" day of k9y, 2005. APPROVED: Terrance J. $ossell, Mayor Pro -Tem ATTEST: Sheri C earman, City Secretary 1668112\0rdv.= 0 11 ORDINANCE No. 2005-118 DENYING ATMOS' GRIP REQUEST AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID•TEX DIVISION. WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, (the 'Company') filed with the City of Roanoke ('City'), a request pursuant to Texas Utilities • Code § 104.301 for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system ; and WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(b) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed rate Increase; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Roanoke to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ('Commission"), said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC"), in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company; and • Ordmanoe PD05-1te Page 1 of 3 0 WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law; and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased per -customer investment in infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, which justifies a lower rate of return; and WHEREAS, the Information reviewed by the ACSC consultants Indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further over-eaming by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and • WHEREAS, in consideration of the city taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and In violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request Include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company Included in its calculation projects unrelated to system Improvement (c) the Company failed to recognize the Increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its per -customer Investment In infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the Company's GRIP request would result in over-eaming by the Company in the year of implementation; and (f) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. SECTION 2. That the City Is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. Ordinance 2D05.118 Page 2 of 3 11 SECTION 3, That the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC In this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the city's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTIONS. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such rases provide. SECTION 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. SECTION 7. That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid - Tex Division, Lincoln Center II, 18° Floor, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240. DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council of the City of Roanoke, Texas, on this the 12° day of July, 2005. • �' 1',AMP q SEAL J APPROVED: """tin.nanm+° Cad E. Glerisch,' ., Mayor . L ATTEST: Kell Edwa , City Secreta APPROVED AS TO FORM: eff re, City Attorney Ordinance 2005-118 Page 3 of 3 • CITY OF ROBINSON ORDINANCE 2005-004 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ROBINSON, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION. WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, (the "Company") filed with the City of Robinson ("City"), a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104.301 for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system ; and WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(b) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed rate increase; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Robinson to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's fling at the Railroad Commission ("Commission's, said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC % in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and 1668\12\Ordinmm WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company; and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law; and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased per -customer investment in infrastructure dining calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company bas publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and • WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, which justifies a lower rate of return; and WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further over -earning by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the city taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROBINSON, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth, (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its per -customer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the • Company's GRIP request would result in over-eaming by the Company in the year of 1668\12\0rdinance implementation; and (f) the Company bas failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. SECTION 2. That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to bire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. SECTION 3. That the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the city's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. SECTION 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the • time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. SECTION 7. That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid - Tex Division, 300 S. St. Paul Street, Suite 8-113 EC, Dallas, Texas, 75201. • DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council of the City of Robinson, Texas, on this the 12th day of July, 2005. EST: iiu //Y� _ a `mch, City Secretary 1668\12\Ordiamw APPRO Bryan Ferguson, Mayor of Robinson File Number: 2005362 City of Rowlett ..ty of RO eft • TEx w sJ File Number: 2005362 City of Rowlett ..ty of RO eft 4009 Main Street Official Co P0Box 99 py Rowlett, TX 75030 Ordinance: 2005-362 www.cl.rowlen.ix.us Enactment Number: ORD -31-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ROWLETT, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR A PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS INCURRED BY THE CITY; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORR, MID-TEX DIVISION. WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp , Mid -Tex Division, (the "Company") filed with the City of Rowlett ("City"), a request for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Companys statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005; and WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(b) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Rowlett to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ("Commission"), said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC"), in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends findings that the Company's proposal is unjustified and unreasonable; and WHEREAS, contrary to statements in the Company's GRIP filing, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information shows that the Company actually decreased investment in infrastructure for calendar year 2003; and CRY or RoMett Page / PnnleC on W7V5 File Number. 2005-362 Enactment Number ORD -31-05 • WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby under counting the revenues it will receive from Its proposed GRIP rate increase; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, which justifies a lower rate of return. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROWLETT, TEXAS: Section 1: That the Company's GRIP rete increase request is found to be unreasonable and is therefore denied in all respects. The unreasonableness of the request includes the following: (a) the Company decreased its investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (b) even without the proposed GRIP rate increase, the Company expects profits well in excess of those approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; (c) the Company's GRIP calculations fail to account for customer growth in the system; and (d) the Company's GRIP filing fails to recognize the markedly different capital structure of the Company from that considered in GUD No. 9400. Section 2: That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and • consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of a rate ordinance and the rate case filed at the Commission. Section 3: That the costs incurred by the City in reviewing the Company's GRIP request shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. Section 4: That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the city's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. Section 5: This Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. Section 6: That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. Section 7: A copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, 300 S. St. Paul Street, Suite 6-113 EC, Dallas, Texas, 75201. At a meeting of the City Council on 6/21/2005, a motion was made by Councilmember Sebastian, seconded by Deputy Mayor Pro Tem Bryan, that this Ordinance be adopted. The motion passed by the following vote: Gbo7RoWed Pa9e 2 Printed on &27M File Number. 2005362 Ena00nent Number. ORD31-05 Ayes: 7 Mayor Johnson, Mayor Pro Tem Alberts, Councilmember Maggiotto, Councilmember Rushing, Deputy Mayor Pro Tem Bryan, Councilmember Sebastian and Councilmember Alsup Approved by • • by by Date 6/21/05 Mayor Date 6/21/05 City Attorney `Le%Y Date 6/21/05 City Secretary CRY o/Rowtrtl Peg. 3 Wined on 827/05 James Johnson 8175775497 p.8 • ORDINANCE NO. 2005-13 ORDINANCE DENYING ATMOS• GRIP REQUEST AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAGINAW, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MIDTEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THIN MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MD -TEX DIVISION. WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Mrd -Tex Division, (the "Company") filed with the City of Saginaw ("City"), a request pursuant to Tesas Utilities Code § 104.301 for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system ; and WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.00 I(b) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed me increase; and WHMEAS, it is reasonable for the City of Saginaw to cooperate with other cities in a welition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the'Rsilroad Commission ("Commission"), said coalition being known es Almos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC"), in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in mtemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility, and 1e6aV210rdiaaao: CI James Johnson 9175775497 p,9 WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company; and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law; and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased per -customer investment in infrastnachne during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails m account for growth in numbers; of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP raze increase; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital stmcnue, which justifies a lower rate of rerum; and WHEREAS. the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that is implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further over -earning by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the city taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAGINAW, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company impropmly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its per -customer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the Company's GRIP request would result in over-eaming by the Company in the year of implementation; and (i) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory 166SU 20rdmma 0 James Johnson 8175775457 P.10 • prerequishes to qualify for a GRIP mte increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP stamina constitutes a constitutional application of the statma SECTION 2. That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission SECTION 3. That the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the city's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTION S. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. SECTION 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which Us Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. SECTION 7. That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's • application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid - Tex Division, Lincoln Center II, le Floor, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240. DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council ofthe City of Saginaw, Texas, on this the Sih day ofJuly, 2005. ••a n. a a• 16691121Ocdiaana 0 APPROVED: Frankie Robbins, Mayor ATTEST: q /(.Lf.9h+ rltttl/i� Nelda Mays, city5 JUL-ZC-NUI rKl ue;w rn KInuD nmr:w PM Mi. 011aumsev r, UJ CIA' 13F SEA000ILLE PACS 02 07/22/2805 10:02 9727873091 ORDINANCE NO. I" AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEAGOVILLE, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP.,;;;TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS IiELIABQ.TIY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRARTAMOF (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN TEUS MUNICIPALITY, AS A P THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DrgrPJBMON SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OI,T"' FX CI S WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP.. r� .SDS CITIES DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SCS PAH�ORTZING ACSC TO [DRE STEERING COMMITTEE ( C); LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NPGO�T THE COMPANY AD DIRECTANY NECESSAR�,OS AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CIIY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PRO�. A RyQUtRF.MFNT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF PASDSED ING Ig ppEN TO '19;E PUBLIC AST ffiREQUNED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE 70 ATMOS ENERGY CORP, MD)-TEx DIVISION. WHEREAS, on or about De=b, 17,2M, Atmos Enema' Corp., Mid -Tex Division. (tbe "Ctmmpm ) JJW with the City of Scagoville (`City"), a:cgttest Pats» ant to Tcm Utilities Code § 104.301 for as annual Sas reliability initxstrmmx'e progm (GRIP) ratio inmedae for The 5 smrewide gas tmlity Sys= to be effective Fdsua 15, 2005, and s,h� oy extendedthst 0&07 date wta Match 4, 2005, for aomc cities on its system; and V;I-IEREAS, the City has exedusive ori0inal juoad'ction to ovdu'ce the Cpmpany's request w it pertains to the S mTntGon &,iiitim locamd within tho City. Pas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(h) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the CM t®oly acted to suspend the effcoii c date of Atmos' Proposed tan iturmw and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Seagoville to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities is opposition to the CM,s Sling nI *c Railroad Comoli%ion ("Commissioa")6 raid coaNtion being kwm Atmos Citim Smertng Commitee (`ACSC"), in any appeal of the cines, actions to the Cam_ .ou; and INTIE$EAS, the Gas Utility Regabdory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to mt,oze is rate proceedings filed m the Raffiroad Commission; and wHFR.F,AS, the Taal Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costa iuc n by the City in rawmahing activities are to be tdmbursed by the regulated v4Tity, sed 0 1658,12`0r� JUL-' Z-CWb M UC:bf M A101A rf KUY tAX NU. U1IJUSLSLO Y. U4 ... .._ _._.. CITY nF GEAGNILLE PUE 83 87/22/2089 18:82 9722873891 r 1 L J WHEREAS, ACSC's rare case uyc»xs incurred in this ars reesoaeLle and should be reimlaascdby the Comp -Y, and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon mnew of the Company's filing and ITOO 1lnditg tiled the Company's proposal " oousc@ation with various coamltants, recorrunwd' GTtIP statrde (fes �� Code ugjusti5ed, umrasonable and is not in conplin= with the 5 104 301) either in feet Orin Inco; and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company is response to ACSC's requests for ud'ormadon indicates that the Cnpamy aaualb' decreased per-costomet investment m irfiastrra= during, oalrmds year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company bas Publicly stated that it will VA, profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400: and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP MP= fails to aocoom for gww01 is runmbms of cusmmem, tLereby underww=g the revenues it will rer:dve from its proposed GRIP tate increase; and WHEREAS, the Compmy's GRIP request fails to reoogmm the[ GUD No. 9400 anus included profit based on TRU Corporffion's capital strumae rather tban Atmos EnergY Corp.'s current capital sn emre, ,hichjustifies a Iowa rein of return; and • WHEREAS, the information rmawed by the ACSC consultants mdiOnos that implementetion of the Compavy's OW request would MwIt in 5mba ovetbemiag by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the city eking action before August 12, Z005, on the cm=Uy pending GRIP request, the Company Las agreed not m ffic env addrhonal GRIP requems before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDADMD By THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Cfl'Y OF SEAGOVILLE, TEXAS! SECTION 1. That Ore Company's GRIP rare increase request is farad to be *Wdfied, unseasonable and in vicladaa of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request hrclude, but are not limited to, the fallowing: (a) the Company hnpmpmly included in is calculation Projects amelated to system its vera tate hesee @) the Coanpmy a the inmaa,ed revenue it ts now system improvement; (c) Ura es anpeny d by he reDCormaiz receiving due to Marren ries approved by 1La Commission at GUD the 9400 cad dm m castnmer grown; (d) dafo:ass¢or s waw by rho Company indicated that the Company actually 2003' (e) approval of the decreased its peo-cusmq=t investmentuldia'°frsahucnae i `Mender your ' in the year of Company's on; request world sny is ailed to Ds the Compmeet the my prereq Bates to and y the Compete has failed to flits pmp mod of implemm�m prerequisites m qualify for a GRIP ran increase, n tbeton of the stsauk- nf tLc GP.TP snatr4e eorsritutes a ranstitvtioml erddieatl 1666azordioaKo 0 re JUL-22-2005 FRI 02:57 PM ATMOS ENERGY FAX NO. 8173032929 P, JE Pelma 84 87/22/2085 10:02 9722673891 CITY CF SEAGDAIF Within the SECTION 2. That the City ibaMrshOnired ve fo®ed to and disci i.Sd cow � Company`s Diem ot, With the Company, make recommendations to the City regscdiaS consuhants, nag ated µwith an appeal of Ibis ordinance trasooable rates and w direct say moessary utiganon associ to tls Commission. SECTION 3. That the costs incurred byACSC is revrewurg the Con"Pany's GRIP rrqlxst and mpresemthtg ACSC in this IM ding are hereby found to be reasonable and uPoo submission to the CmMPmy, shall be Promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorved to intervene in any appeal of the city's action filed or the Commission. and to parocipate in any such appeal as amember of ACSC. SECTION 5. That ibis Ordinance shall become effative itmr d ly from and after Its passage, as the law and ebmter in such cases Provide. SECTION 6. That it is b—by officially found end dolermiaed that the meeting at wWu 11 ibis Ordinance is Passed is open to the public as required by law and thin Public notice of the time, Place sad PurP08e of said meeting was gJven asrequired SEC7i0247. That a copy of this wdiaance, constituting final action on the Contpanps app&anon, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designAcd s' mayll If y. Cap- Nud- TestD vi days 00S. S Peru StrM, S 8-1M 1& 3 6C, Dan,% �o 75201. Tex Division, SECTION 8- Any Person, firm or corporation violating any of t o Provisions of this ordinance or the Pmvisioas of the Code of Ordmences of the City of Seagoville. Texas, as emended hereby, shah be deemed gouty of a Inisirmeanm and, upon maviction is the mt>mcipat cam of the City of Seagoville, Texas, sball be subject to a fine not to exceed the sum of Five Nrmdred (5500.00) dollars for each offense, and each and every day such offense shall ccomw snap be decd to constitute a scpvale offense. SECTION 9. That all provisions of the Ordic5m,Ys of the City of Seagoville is oo Let With the provisions of thus ordinance be, and the seats are hereby, "Pealed, and at! Proaisions of the ordinances of the City of Seagoville not in conflict with the provisions of this Orlin== sball remain in full force and effect SECTION 10. Should any scafmco, paragraph, suhdivRroo, clause, phram or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be urrconstimaOrel, illegal or invelid, the serm9 shall not affect the validity of this ordinance, as a whole, or any part or Provision thereof other then the Put so decided to be invalid, illegal or tmmmtitutional, and shall not affect the validity of the Code of Ordiaannes of the City of Seagoville, Texas. 166xil210rdeaaea is JUL-22-2005 FRI 0258 PN AIT1OS_ENERGY FAS NO. 8173032929 Y. U6 — — — —ex7r cF srscnvnLE PAGE e9 e7/22/28e5 Re:e2 9722873991 • DULY PASSED end APPMved by the City Couaca of the City of S=govill0. Texas, on this the 21" day of 7uly 2005. APP VED: SOROSLUMS, MAYOR ATTEST: ROSA A RIGS, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO f ORM: ROBERT HAGER, CITY AVORNEY 11 1fi68�12`OtdWnce • SLJL-19-2605 12:11 FR0M:9-EFZM 19838914249 TO:912142862131 P.2,5 I ORDINANCE 5315 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHERMAN, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MH16TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MI]-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIES LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF • COSTS; PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION; FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED WAS NOTICED AND IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW. WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid - Tex Division, (the "Company') filed with the City of Sherman ("Cityj, a request pursuant to Testas Utilities Code § 104.301 for an annual gas reliability infiastractwe program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective Febtuary 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system; and WHEREAS, the City bas exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution famlities located within the City, purauaot to Texas Utilities Cod* §§ 102.001(6) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective dates of Atmos' proposed rate increase; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Sherman to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission CCommission'7, said coalition being )mown as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC"), in my appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and • D1mINANCE 5715 Pence 1 d4 SIA -19-2995 12:11 FREMSFERMF44 19936914249 TG:912142062131 P.315 • WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants load regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred. by the City in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and WHEREAS, ACSC's rate cast expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should he reimbursed by the Company; and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (texas Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law; and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company m response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased per -customer investment in infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive • substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undismomiting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, which justifies a lower rate of return; and WHEREAS, the information reviewed by ACSC consultants indicates that implcmantation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further over- taming by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the City taking action before August 17- 20015, on currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreednot to file my additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CTTV OF SHERMAN, TEXAS: • oRMANCS $375 P*ar 2 er 4 JLL-19-EMS 12:12 FFON:SiERNRN 19935914249 T0:912142962131 P.415 P L—A SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unjustified, umessonable, and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its per -customer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the Company's GRIP request would result in over-eaming by the Company in the year of implementation; and (f) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP statute constitutes application of the statute. SECTION 2. That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cilies within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission, • SECTION 3. That the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the City's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as law and charter in such cases provide. SECTION 6. That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within t0 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, Lincoln Center II, 18w Floor, 5420 L13J Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240. SECTION 7. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meetings at which this ordinance was introduced and passed were open to the public and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meetings were given all as required by law. • olmrrurecassis Pq.3.14 JLL-19-2005 12:12 FROM SHE -M 19839914299 70:912142092131 P.515 • INTRODUCED on this the 18th day of July , 2005. ADOPTED on this the 18th day of July . 2005. EFFECTIVE DATE on Ibis the 18th dsy of JULY .2005. CITY OF SHERMAN, TEXAS BY: I YOR ATTEST: BY: • LINDA ASHBY, CITY rRK APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: W CHARLES CTPY ATTORNEY CSRTIFIED COPY- DOCUMENT THIS iS CERTIFIED TO OE A TRUE COPY OF THE PEUMENT RECORD AS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CIl"f CLERK. k"-r OTT CLEM SHER11Al1JIMS mmll�_ ORDINA Cg:5115 Page 4 of 07/N -N05 10:[[ YAx 13P573431u4 Tau GAS-ABILENE4faa1 U!%Ltll'ClYJS !1:[3 NJ 14 r.wu From: • ORDINANCE NO.790 DENYINGATMOS' Mg REQUEST AN ORDINANCE OF TEm CITY OF STAMFORD, TEXAS, DENYING FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROWL434 (GRIP5 IL11E INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF TBE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVIIQG COOPERATION WITH OTSER CITIES WITHIN *THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP, XDTEX DIVISION STEER -M (ACSC);AAUTHORTGING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH TRE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTPRVEI'iTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OP THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQTIRI'�M,?r FOR PROMPT Rli'IM'U ISEM 14T OF COFM nKD]NG THAT TILE MEETING AT WMCR TMS ORDINANCE 6 PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS RL' UnZED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF TffiS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS _ ENERGY CORP, Mlti-TEXDIVISION. WHEREAS, on or about December 17, N04, Atmos Energy Corp-, Mid -Tex Division, ttbu: "Company") filed with the City of Stamford ("Citym), a request Pasvant to Texas Utilities Code 6 104301 for an anneal gas reliability infrasburtme program (GRIP) :ate increase for customers on the Company's stat"wtde gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and mbsegaeody extended that effective date nanl Match4, 2005, for some cities on its system; and WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's T� request Cit ode ffp rtwas2-Oto the amltution' facilities located wittda the City. preauan t to Utitit WHEREAS, the City timely acted to saapeod the effective date of Atmos' proposed rate increase; sad VaU TEAS, it is reasonable for the City of Stamford to cooperate with other cities iu a coabition of cities in opposition to the CompanYs fling at the liaihued Commisa'On ("Coit mmar n'), said coalition being knovm as Atmos Cities Stemimg Committee ("ACSC" h in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local tegut mry authorities the right to intervene in rate prooeeedmgs filed at the Railroad Commission; aad 16ZI2 C SLJL-20-20 08=37 FPo(: i0:wEST REGION PAai:za-- R=134r OT/20/2005 10:22 FAX 13257343IV4 'TAU GAS-ABIIENE UJI-AVLUtct ZG Ye ,l314 rAA-'+av"iea3 From: WHEREAS, ft Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 pmMas&k c rs incurred by [be City In ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed byte ralldgdutifitT, WHEREAS, ACSC's rate reSe erpens� iaetrned in this proceeding ere reasonable and should be ,i mbursed by the Compsny, and WIUMAS, counsel for ACSC, upon mview Of � Pa"Y's Company's open s sal is consdked, with various consultants, re PhOnce finding statute exas tl6litirs Code �jutified, untsrsonable and is not in mmpiimce with the GRIl' (T § 104301) either in fact or in law; end WHMMAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for infmmedon indicates that the CompanY actually decreased per'cnstornez investment in itrfrashmrore dung calendar year 2003; end WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated tbst it will receive substantial profit in 20o5 over that approved by the Commission in GUD Na. 9900; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRP request ihlb tO account for Pnwth in 'Lumbers o= customers, thereby onderco.64 the revenues n NIL receive from its proposed GRP rate mcrtaae; and W11HRE-45. the CamPanY s GRIP rcTx t fails to recognize diet GtM No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital streams mbar than Atmos Energy Corp.'s © current capital structure, wbirh jns5fiea A lower ram of return; and WHEREAS, the inforzration reviewed by the ACSC eoasoltants indicates aul implementation of the Company's ORP request would result in further aver<amiag by the Company ebovethat approved by the Cocuntesionin CUD NO, 9400; and in re 02 ft currently p�m� S,GRP nxNe� on Of tbLe city 1as Company bas g� action nnot to file my additional ORS requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED EY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANFORD, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Thar the Company's GRIP rate in""se r'egueet ie found to ba ngjOldflad, urrwomable and in violation of the GRIP sbunte and is th mfo denied in all respects' The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the fo]owiag (s) the Ceproy improperly calculated its 2003 ram base; (b) the Company i A„rlrvi in its "'Oulstion projects tnrelamd to System tmpmvoment; (o) the Company faded to reco” the inlxrased. revenues it is now receiving due m ineressed rates approved by the Commission ie GUD No. 9400 and clue to customer growth; (d) int'mmahan supplied bYthe Company indicated thou the CompanY actually decreased its perrautOIIw investment in infrastructure in caieader year 2003; (a) Wwvel of the Company's GRP request would result in over-csrning by the CompenY in the year of 1669\1Mdimn:e • z.n ID:wEST REGION ppario 3 R -94a 07/20/2005 10:29 FAX 15257545104 Tau GAS-ASILeNB Ul171Y'd116 �.� eta root Fran: implementnbou; sad (f) the Company has Mid to demoasbmte that it meet the etahAmY praegwutes m quafy for a GRIP rete IMISe m fbat its proposed meUd of implementstIM of the GRIP aphne coastitntes s tonatitu60m41 application of the statnm. SECTION 2. That the City is avtborized to cooperate with nihar Cites within the Comp.ny's Dist ibmliou System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal Counacl and cansrilt®ts, negotiate with the Compsey, metro recou'rumdations to the City regs'dio8 reasonable rates and to direct any nemM litigation associated with m sp?cal of this mdb=w to the Commission. SECTSON 3. That the Costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GF'U request and representing ACSC in this pmrmedmg em hereby toond to be reasonable and, upon submission to ttx Company, shall be p'cunpdy reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to mtervelle in eay aPPeal of the city's acfion filed at the Commission, and to participate m any such cppeal as a member of ACSC, SECTION 5. That tris Ordinance sball become effective immediately from and aflg its passage, ae the law and charter in such cases provide. SECTION 6. That it is hereby oiliciany found and dammmEad that the meetug at which this 0,dinanea is pursed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given ss required. • SECITON 7. That a copy of this miicsnce, eonsdUXting final motion on the Comp an}'5 appticaflon, shall be forwarded to the appropriate desiguffied represcatat" of the Company IN Nsd- Tex D• Iry sum, Lincoln Center II 18 PIoor, 54220 LB' Pree�t sy�DeEas, TTezas, 752440 DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council of the City of Stamford, Texas, m thio the 5th day of July, 2Do5. AP OVED: joEmyccrg, Mayor ST. J e McCrigh4 City Soarciary APPROVED AS TO FO Chane,". 66 i- ey • ]a68`.1210rdavax 3 ,tui-E9-2ees 0e:3e Pax: IDLEST RECTION PPG= -:6a4 R-94% • CITY OF THE COLONY ORDINANCE NO. W--1603 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF THE COLONY, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DMSION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT TIRE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND • PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION. • WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, (the "Company') filed with the City of The Colony ("City'), a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104.301 for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system ; and WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(b) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed rate increase; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of The Colony to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ("Commission', said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC"), in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission, and 1668\12\Ordinance • WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility', and WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company; and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law; and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased per -customer investment in infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and • WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, whichjustifies a lower rate of return; and WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further over-eaming by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the city taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF THE COLONY, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its per -customer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the • Company's GRIP request would result in over -earning by the Company in the year of 1658\l2\Ordinance • implementation; and (f) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. SECTION 2. That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. SECTION 3. That the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the city's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. SECTION 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the Is time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. SECTION 7. That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mi.d- Tex Division, Lincoln Center II, 18's Floor, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240. DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council of the City of The Colony, Texas, on this the 11t8 day of July, 2005. APPR*Z:�, Bob Hager, City 1668\12\Ordinance 0 ORDINANCE 05-10 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CFTY OF WOODWAY, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICD'ALFTY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMfPTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIR LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DHtECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION. • WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos. Energy Corp., Mid -Tex Division, (the "Company'? filed with the City of Woodway ("City'?, a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §.104.301 for an "nual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system ; and W13EREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(6) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed rate increase; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Woodway to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ("Commission's, said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC"), in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City • in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and 1668\12\0rdiaence • WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company; and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law, and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased percustomer investment in infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, which justifies a lower rate of return; and • WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further ova-eaming by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the city taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCII, OF THE CITY OF WOODWAY, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its per -customer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the Company's GRIP request would result in over -earning by the Company in the year of implementation; and (f) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation • of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. 1666112\0rdinance SECTION 2. That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. SECTION 3. That the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the city's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in my such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. SECTION 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. SECTION 7. That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company • within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid- Tex Division, Lincoln Center IL I81h Floor, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240. DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council of the City of Woodway, Texas, on this the 11"' day of July 2005. AFFVED • 1668\12\0rdinance ORDINANCE NO. 2005-33 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABIITTY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN TILS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID -TER DIVISION. WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., bid -Tex Division, �- (the "Company") filed with the City of Wylie ("City'), a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code § 104.301 for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective February 15, 2005, and subsequently extended that effective date until March 4, 2005, for some cities on its system ; and WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(b) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed raze increase; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Wylie to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ("Commission"), said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC"), in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grams local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and Ordinance 2005-2005-33 Dating ATMOS EueW Rare 1=esse (GRIP) WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company; and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code § 104.301) either in fact or in law, and WHEREAS, information provided by the Company in response to ACSC's requests for information indicates that the Company actually decreased per -customer investment in infrastructure during calendar year 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 over that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, which justifies a lower rate of return; and • WHEREAS, the information reviewed by the ACSC consultants indicates that implementation of the Company's GRIP request would result in further over-eaming by the Company above that approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the city taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. The defects in the request include, but are not limited to, the following. (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included in its calculation projects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in GUD No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its per -customer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the Company's GRIP request would result in over -earning by the Company in the year of implementation; and (f) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. Ordinance 2005-2005-33 Denying ATMOS Energy Rate Increase (GRIP) 2 0 -SECTION 2. That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the , Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. SECTION 3. That the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the city's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. SECTION 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required SECTION 7. That a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid - Tex Division, Lincoln Center IL 18" Floor, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240. DULY PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Wylie, Texas, on this the 12th day of July, 2005. Date of Publication in The Wvhe News—July 13, 2005 18 - Ordinance 2005-2005.33 Denying ATMOS Energy Rate lncreaee (GRIP) 3